Skip to main content

Del Nido versus HTK cardioplegia for myocardial protection during adult complex valve surgery: a retrospective study

Abstract

Background

Histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) and del Nido (DN) cardioplegia are intracellular-type and extracellular-type solution respectively, both can provide a long period of myocardial protection with single-dose infusion, but studies comparing the two are rare for adult cardiac surgery. This study aims to evaluate whether DN is suitable for cardioplegia in complex and high-risk valve surgery with long-term cardiac ischemia when compared with HTK.

Methods

The perioperative records of adult patients infused with DN/HTK as a cardioplegic solution who underwent complex valve surgery with an expected myocardial ischaemic duration longer than 90 min between Oct 2018 and Oct 2019 were analysed retrospectively.

Results

Of the 160 patients who received DN/HTK and underwent complex valve surgery, we propensity matched 73 pairs. Both groups achieved satisfactory cardiac arrest effects, and no significant difference was found in their cTnI and CK-MB levels within 12 to 72 h postoperatively. The DN group had a higher rate of return to spontaneous rhythm (0.88 v 0.52, P < 0.001), a lower frequency of postoperative severe arrythmias (12% v 26%, P = 0.036), a higher postoperative stroke volume (65 v 59 ml, P = 0.011) and a higher cardiac output (6.0 v 4.9 L/min, P = 0.007) as evaluated by echocardiography, fewer transfusions and shorter ICU stays (both P < 0.05). The two groups had similar inotrope usage and similar incidences of low cardiac output, morbidities and mortality. Subgroup analysis showed that when the aortic clamping time was greater than 120 min, the advantages of DN were weakened.

Conclusions

DN can be safely applied to complex valve surgery, and it has a similar myocardial protection effect as HTK. Further prospective studies are required to verify these retrospective findings.

Trial registration retrospectively registered.

Peer Review reports

Background

Single-dose cardioplegia during complex, minimally invasive or redo cardiac operations is attractive to surgeons since it avoids interruption of the ongoing procedure and decreases the aortic clamping time [1]. Several studies have found beneficial effects of a longer cardiac ischaemia time with the use of single-dose cardioplegic infusion, such as with histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) or del Nido (DN) solution [2,3,4], but both types are often compared with conventional blood cardioplegia (20–30 min interval). DN solution offers 60 to 90 min of arrest before redosing is required [4, 5], and HTK (Custodiol®) may offer even longer protection (more than 2 h) [6].

Both HTK and DN cardioplegia have been applied in adult cardiac surgery for many years, but few studies have directly compared the two therapies. One possible reason is that HTK is an intracellular-type cardioplegia (all crystalloid), while DN is an extracellular-type cardioplegia mixed with blood (crystalloid: blood = 4:1). The formula, induction dose, and reperfusion interval of the two are different. In our literature review, we could only find two published papers that directly compared DN and HTK. One treated paediatric patients undergoing surgical correction for tetralogy of Fallot [7], and the other enrolled adult low-risk patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery [8]. The two studies demonstrated better outcomes in the DN group for some clinical endpoints. However, the myocardial protective effect of DN for high-risk adult patients or during complex procedures requiring a long arrest is uncertain.We began to use DN cardioplegia in adult complex valve surgery in September 2018 in our hospital. To evaluate the safety, efficacy and myocardial protection effect of DN cardioplegia in adult complex valve surgery, we retrospectively compared this solution with the classic HTK solution.

Methods

Patients

The medical records of consecutive adult patients who underwent valve surgery at Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from Oct 2018 to Oct 2019 were analysed retrospectively. The ethics review board of our hospital approved the study (ID:2018081047), and the requirement for informed consent was waived because of the retrospective design. Patients who were older than 16 years and who underwent complex valve surgery were included. “Complex valve surgery” meant elective multiple valve surgery plus at least one of the following procedures: aortic vessel/coronary artery bypass graft/maze/congenital heart defect/cardiac tumour or redo/mini-multiple valve surgery. These procedures have an expected cardiopulmonary bypass duration of more than 150 min and an aortic clamping time of more than 90 min, and require multiple infusions of conventional potassic blood cardioplegia. Conventional potassic blood cardioplegia was our center's strategy for routine single procedures, while HTK or DN for multiple procedures. The following patients were excluded from the analysis: those with incomplete records in electronic medical records, those who were not managed using HTK or DN cardioplegia, those who were managed using two kinds of cardioplegia.

Cardioplegia

The formula, final ion concentration and method of application are listed in Table 1. According to the different types of cardioplegia used during the operation, patients were divided into two groups: the DN and HTK groups. When DN/HTK solution was infused, at least one check was performed to ensure that there was no incomplete clamping/cardioplegia solution leakage. If residual electrical activity (an electrocardiogram showed no interference but instead showed waves of cardiac activity during cross-clamping) occurred and continued (not intermittently) for more than 3 min, reperfusion was necessary. The reperfusion dosing for residual activity was 200–300 ml or until no electrical activity was present.

Table 1 The formula, ions concentration when used, application methods and prices of two kinds of cardioplegia solutions: DN versus HTK

Perioperative data

All patients were cared for by the same team of anaesthesiologists, surgeons, perfusionists, and intensivists. The details of the anaesthesia, surgical procedure, and cardiopulmonary bypass itself were reported previously [9]. Postoperatively, all patients were transported to the intensive care unit (ICU) while intubated and ventilated. The demographic characteristics, cardiac comorbidity, type of surgery along with intraoperative variables, duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation (MV), length of ICU stay, postoperative hospital stay, and short-term outcomes (postoperative inotropic administration, perioperative blood transfusion, postoperative morbidity and mortality) were recorded. Inotropic administration was defined as the dosage of either dopamine (Dop), epinephrine (E) or norepinephrine (NE), for at least 1 h during the first 24 postoperative hours, and were recorded as grade (Additional file 2: instruction 1). Allogeneic transfusions were performed according to the ‘Granducato algorithm’ [10]: haemoglobin < 7 g/dl, intraoperative evidence of end-organ ischaemia, life-threatening bleeding, and viscoelastic tests for bleeding management. Postoperative morbidity included cardiac (low cardiac output, postoperative severe arrhythmia) and non-cardiac [postoperative multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), postoperative central nervous system (CNS) injury, postoperative lung injury, postoperative acute kidney injury, postoperative acute liver injury, postoperative stress ulcer] morbidity. Postoperative low cardiac output [11] refers to the need for a high dose of inotropics (Dop > 15 μg kg−1 min−1/E > 0.1 μg kg−1 min−1/NE > 0.1 μg kg−1 min−1) to maintain a systolic blood pressure greater than 90 mmHg or the need for mechanical circulation support [extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP)] after the operation. Severe arrythmia refers to total atrioventricular block, sudden cardiac arrest and ventricular fibrillation. CNS injury [12] refers to new onset cerebral haemorrhage, cerebral infarction, paraplegia, hemiplegia, acute mental disorder or hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (temporary or permanent). Lung injury [13] refers to respiratory failure, new-onset pulmonary embolism/oedema/pneumonia/massive pleural effusion, or hypoxemia exceeding 24 h. Acute kidney injury [14] refers to new-onset renal failure requiring renal replacement or basline creatinine elevated by more than 50%. Acute liver injury [15] refers to new-onset hepatic failure or total bilirubin > 51 μmol/L. Stress ulcer refers to new-onset gastrointestinal haemorrhage or melena. Thirty-day mortality (including patients who died 30 days after the operation but who were not discharged) was recorded. Perioperative laboratory tests [cardiac troponin I (cTnI), creatine kinase myocardial isoenzyme (CK-MB), serum aspartate transaminase (AST)] and some echocardiography data were also recorded.

Outcomes

The primary outcome was the highest serum cTnI level within postoperative 12 h. Secondary outcomes contained inotropes, incidency of return to spontaneous rhythm after removing aortic clamping forceps, postoperative severe arrythmias, and low cardiac output. Furthermore, stroke volume(SV) and ejection fraction (EF) assessed using echocardiography after surgery, peak value of CK-MB and AST levels on postoperative days 1, 2 and 3 were also included. Tertiary outcomes were the aortic clamping time, echocardiography of atrioventricular size data after surgery, and postoperative clinical outcomes including the MV time, ICU time, transfusions, post-hospital days, in-hospital morbidities, and 30-day mortality.

Statistical analyses

Categorical variables are summarized as frequencies and percentages, while continuous variables are expressed as the mean ± SD when the data were normally distributed and as the interquartile range (IQR) [P50(P25,P75)] when the data were non-normally distributed. To generate two evenly matched cohorts of patients who received DN or HTK, we propensity score matched patients by using the following pre- and intraoperative variables according to univariate logistic regression and the guidance of statistical experts: sex, age, weight, preoperative cTnI, preoperative EF, preoperative SV, preoperative NYHA grade 3–4, preoperative arrhythmia, EuroSCORE II, preoperative lung diseases, preoperative cardiac infarction, diabetes, combination with aortic surgery, combination with a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) operation,preoperative serum creatinine, and CPB time. Of the 76 patients who received DN, we matched 73 DN patients with 73 who received HTK patients who underwent complex valve surgery during the same time period. The remaining patients had no suitable propensity scores. The matching tolerance was 0.15, and the propensity scores ranged from 0.12779 to 0.86060. Discrimination and calibration of propensity scores were assessed with the Hosmer–Lemeshow test and C-statistics. After matching, the most of standard mean differences (SMDs) became smaller(see the SMDs in Additional file 2: instruction 2). The chi-square test was used for categorical variables, Mann–Whitney U test was used for continuous variables when the data were non-normally distributed, and t-test was used when data were normally distributed. Perioperative laboratory tests of myocardial injury markers were compared using analysis of variance of repeated measurement data. Before subgroup analysis, the comparability of pre-operative and some intra-operative variables within each subgroup had been proved by Mann–Whitney U test or chi-square test (see Additional file 2: instruction 3). The trial was designed to investigate the potential superiority of DN in terms of decreasing postoperative cardiac injury. According to the previous studies [11, 16], we inputed the mean intervention group and the control group value of cTnI with 7.3 and 8.3 respectively. The standard deviation is 10.8, with difference 4 is clinical significant. The sample calculator outputed that 58 patients per group would be sufficient with a power of 0.8 and an alpha risk of 0.05. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant, and p < 0.15 was considered to be included in the matching model. Missing data within 10% were filled with multiple imputations. Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS 23.0 (SPSS Software, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY,USA).

Results

During the study period, 785 patients underwent valvular operation and 146 were matched and analyzed (Fig. 1). The demographic characteristics and preoperative conditions of matched patients were listed in Table 2. All patients were Chinese local residents, the median age was 56 (range 16–77) years, the percentage of male patients exceeded 60% (90/146), and more than half of the patients (77/146) had a small body size (≤ 60 kg, weight range 32–115 kg). As shown in Table 2, most patients had comorbidities impairing recovery in addition to multiple valvular diseases, but there were no significant differences between the two groups.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart diagram

Table 2 Preoperative characteristics of matched patients undergone complex valve surgery

Overall evaluation

The two kinds of cardioplegic solutions both achieved satisfactory cardiac arrest effects. Residual electrical activity occurred in the HTK group(the DN group didn’t) sometimes but non-continued, so reperfusion was not needed. DN was cheaper than HTK but inconvenient (DN was improvisated by doctors and drug-error probability may happen, HTK was a commericial product and can be used anytime). As shown in Table 3, the DN group had a shorter reinfusion interval (50 vs. 83 min, P < 0.001) and a higher number of infusions than the HTK group (2 vs. 1, P < 0.001). The total cardioplegic volume was lower in the DN group than in the HTK group (1265 vs. 1900 ml, P < 0.001). The two groups had similar procedures, cardiopulmonary bypass times and aortic clamping times.

Table 3 Perioperative details of paired patients undergone complex valve surgery

Outcomes

As shown in Fig. 2, Tables 3 and 4, no significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of the peak cTnI,CK-MB or AST levels on postoperative days 1, 2 and 3. There was also no differences for postoperative inotropes, EF, the incidence of low cardiac output, the aortic clamping time, the atrioventricular size on echocardiography, MV time, postoperative hospital days, in-hospital morbidities, or 30-day mortality. However, in the DN group, there were a higher incidence of return to spontaneous rhythm and a lower incidences of postoperative severe arrythmias, more SV and CO after surgery, a shorter ICU time and fewer transfusions.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Perioperative comparison serum levels of myocardial injury markers between the DN group and the HTK group. DN, del Nido; HTK, histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate; cTnI, cardiac troponin I; CK-MB, creatine kinase myocardial isoenzyme; AST, serum aspartate transaminase. (See the Additional file 2: instruction 4, no statistical differences were found)

Table 4 Perioperative results of echocardiography in paired patients undergone complex valve surgery

We performed subgroup analyses according to whether the aortic clamping time was greater than 120 min (Table 5). (The baseline and some intra-operative characteristics of subgroup patients were showed in Additional file 2: instruction 3) There were still no significant differences in cTnI and CK-MB (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). In the subgroup < 120 min, less norepinephrine was used in the DN group. In the subgroup ≥ 120 min, postoperative severe arrhythmia, ICU stay, postoperative SV and CO, and transfusion of plasma and cryoprecipitate were no longer significantly different.

Table 5 Subgroup analysis of two kinds of cardioplegia solution according to whether the aortic clamping time more than 120 min

Discussion

The main contribution of this study was that DN, when compared with HTK, could be safely and effectively applied during adult complex valve surgery with a long period of myocardial protection. DN had some advantages, such as a higher rate of return to spontaneous rhythm after declamping, fewer transfusions, shorter ICU stays, and increased postoperative SV and CO as assessed by echocardiography. However, when the aortic clamping time was longer than 120 min, the advantages of DN were weakened. Two previous studies directly compared DN and HTK for paediatric use and low-risk adults [7, 8], and we expanded the application of DN to longer aortic clamping times in complex and high-risk procedures.

As a type of extracellular cardioplegia, DN facilitates myocardial contractile arrest by providing a high concentration of potassium ions in the extracellular space mixed with blood (crystalloid: blood = 4:1), while HTK is an intracellular-type cardioplegia, and the arrest mechanism involves the balance of intra- and extracellular sodium ions, requiring a longer infusion period (5–7 min, v DN 3–5 min) to reach this balance. Thus, the dosing of DN was less (up to 1000 ml if the weight exceeded 50 kg)[17, 18] than HTK (up to 2000 ml), because the decreased volume and time of perfusion of HTK would result in the development of complications associated with inadequate cardioplegic myocardial protection [19]. Furthermore, the difference in infusion interval time led to a larger number of infusions in the DN group, but it did not affect the aortic clamping time.

The rate of return to spontaneous rhythm in the DN group was higher than that in the HTK group, which was consistent with previous DN cardioplegia versus blood cardioplegia studies [4, 11, 20] (such as modified St. Thomas or Buckberg, blood: crystal = 4:1). The higher rate of return to spontaneous rhythm of DN, which possibly signifies less myocardial ischaemic-reperfusion injury, and the mechanisms are thought to be due to two aspects: the inhibition of calcium influx [21] and the association between the ischaemic myocardium and progressive rewarming during reperfusion [11]. HTK is a pure crystalloid solution with no blood composition; which contains a very low dose of calcium, also contains the Ca2+ blocker magnesium sulphate as in DN. However, HTK does not contain lidocaine (another Ca2+ blocker);perhaps, the co-effect of blocking calcium accumulation in DN (lidocaine and magnesium) is stronger than that in HTK (only magnesium). Similarly, in recent published articles, the use of HTK was associated with increased reperfusion fibrillation [8, 22].

The reasons for the less frequent postoperative severe arrythmias and the shorter ICU stay in the DN group would be multifactorial: electrolyte disturbance, body temperature, postoperative myocardial ischaemia or edema, neuroendocrine hormone, drugs, etc. Although hyponatremia is more common in HTK, postoperative severe arrythmia is rarely reported. When compared with conventional blood cardioplegia, one study showed that more postoperative atrial fibrillation occurred in DN [23] in the high-risk subgroup analysis. In a recent meta-analysis comparing DN and conventional blood cardioplegia undergoing valve or CABG surgery, the use of DN was associated with a shorter ICU stay [24]. We did not collect eletrolyte, body temperature or neuroendocrine data. After adjusting for some perioperative factors (Additional file 2: instruction 5), the cardioplegia type was no longer a significant influencing factor, but postoperative low cardiac output was. In addition, when we performed subgroup analysis (Table 5), the difference in postoperative arrhythmia was no longer significant.

Echocardiography is the most commonly used noninvasive method for the assessment of cardiac function. Postoperatively, the SV and CO were better in the DN group (see Table 4). Subgroup analysis showed that when the aortic clamping time was longer than 120 min, the differences were no longer significant(Table 5). It was deemed inadequate to predict and monitor myocardial damage by the echocardiographic evaluation of SV/CO because an increase in SV/CO represents a real increase in cardiac function or an increase in extracellular fluid volume. Blood volume increased by 40%, and SV/CO increases by 30% [25]. On the other hand, the presence of artefacts from the mechanical aortic valve made it challenging to measure the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) velocity and diameter correctly, which could lead to deviation of the SV/CO measurement [26]. [In our cases, the ratios of the aortic mechanical valve were 31.5% (DN:23/73) vs.27.4% (HTK:20/73), with no significant difference].

Interestingly, the units of erythrocyte administered were similar, but fewer units of platelets,plasma and cryoprecipitate were administered in the DN group. One reason that the cardioplegia type may not influence erythrocyte transfusion may be intraoperative ultrafiltration (all of the patients). We examined some factors affecting platelet transfusions that we did not pay attention to in this study, such as age over 70 years, clopidogrel administration within 7 days before the operation [27], and application of autologous platelet pheresis [28], and no significant difference was found between the two groups (Additional file 2: instruction 6). When the aortic clamping time was longer than 120 min, the transfusion-saving effect of DN was weakened (Table 5), suggesting that additional reinfusions of DN resulted in a higher total cardioplegic volume, dilution and edema as a result of more transfusions [29, 30].

The limitations of our study were its retrospective nature, the limited sample size, the single-centre and single race study, and procedures with CABG or maze could influence the outcome of cTnI. In addition, we did not consider the different temperature of the heart between the two groups or measure the myocardial temperature. On the other hand, we did not calculate the myocardial mass or fluid overload would cause volume bias of cardioplegia and fluid to some extent. Furthermore, more than half of the patients had a small body size, and ultrafiltration used to reduce blood dilution by cardioplegia fluid might make the conclusion of this article not applicable to most patients in Europe and America. The limited sample size was too small to evaluate for adverse morbidity and mortality. We deemed a prospective randomized controlled trial would more better, but the supply of HTK solution from abroad during the COVID-19 epidemic period is very difficult for us. However, we tried our best to provide a comprehensive evaluation of postoperative cardiac function, such as myocardial injury markers, inotropic usage, the rate of return to spontaneous rhythm, echocardiography, incidence of postoperative low cardiac output and severe arrythmias, resource utilization, and heart-related morbidity and mortality. We used Table 6 to summarize advantages and disadvantages of each other. DN was inconvenient (improvisation by doctors when needed) but has an attractive lower cost (shortened ICU stay, fewer transfusions and no expensive drugs in the formula). In developing countries such as China, the labour cost is low, and HTK depends on whole cold-chain transportation or import from abroad, which increase its price. Therefore, we believe that DN is very suitable for underdeveloped regions as long as it is not inferior to HTK.

Table 6 Application analysis of two kinds of cardioplegia solution

Conclusion

DN can be safely applied to complex valve surgery, and it has a similar myocardial protection effect as HTK. Additional prospective randomised controlled trials comparing the myocardial protective effects of DN and HTK cardioplegia for complex valve surgery are required to verify these retrospective findings.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

DN:

Del Nido

HTK:

Histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate

CABG:

Coronary artery bypass graft

MV:

Mechanical ventilation

ICU:

Intensive care unit

Dop:

Dopamine

NE:

Norepinephrine

E:

Epinephrine

ECMO:

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

IABP:

Intra-aortic balloon pump

AKI:

Acute kidney injury

ALI:

Acute liver injury

MODS:

Multiple organ dysfuntion syndrome

CNS:

Central nervous system

NYHA:

The New York Heart Association

CO:

Cardiac output

EF:

Ejection fraction

SV:

Stroke volume

LV:

Left ventricle

RV:

Right ventricle

LA:

Left atrium

RA:

Right atrium

FS:

Fraction shortening

HR:

Heart rate

References

  1. 1.

    Siddiqi S, Blackstone EH, Bakaeen FG. Bretschneider and del Nido solutions: are they safe for coronary artery bypass grafting? If so, how should we use them? J Card Surg. 2018;33(5):229–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Pieri M, Belletti A, Monaco F, Pisano A, Musu M, Dalessandro V, et al. Outcome of cardiac surgery in patients with low preoperative ejection fraction. BMC Anesthesiol. 2016;16(1):97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gorjipour F, Dehaki MG, Totonchi Z, Hajimiresmaiel SJ, Azarfarin R, Pazoki-toroudi H, et al. Inflammatory cytokine response and cardiac troponin I changes in cardiopulmonary bypass using two cardioplegia solutions; del Nido and modified St. Thomas’: a randomized controlled trial. Perfusion. 2017;32(5):394–402.

  4. 4.

    Luo H, Qi X, Shi H, Zhao H, Liu C, Chen H, et al. Single-dose del Nido cardioplegia used in adult minimally invasive valve surgery. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(6):2373–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Nakao M, Morita K, Shinohara G, Kunihara T. Excellent restoration of left ventricular compliance after prolonged del Nido single-dose cardioplegia in an in vivo piglet model. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;32(3):475–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Vivacqua A, Robinson J, Abbas AE, Altshuler JM, Shannon FL, Podolsky RH, et al. Single-dose cardioplegia protects myocardium as well as traditional repetitive dosing: a noninferiority randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;159(5):1857-1863.e1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Talwar S, Chatterjee S, Sreenivas V, Makhija N, Kapoor PM, Choudhary SK, et al. Comparison of del Nido and histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate cardioplegia solutions in pediatric patients undergoing open heart surgery: a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;157(3):1182-1192.e1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lee C, Kwon Y, Park SJ, Lee JW, Kim JB. Comparison of del Nido and histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate cardioplegic solutions in minimally invasive cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;S0022522320333407.

  9. 9.

    Hu Q, Luo W, Huang L, Huang R, Chen R, Gao Y. Multiorgan protection of remote ischemic perconditioning in valve replacement surgery. J Surg Res. 2016;200(1):13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Scolletta S, Simioni P, Campagnolo V, Celiento M, Fontanari P, Guadagnucci A, et al. Patient blood management in cardiac surgery: the “Granducato algorithm.” Int J Cardiol. 2019;289:37–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Sanetra K, Gerber W, Shrestha R, Domaradzki W, Krzych Ł, Zembala M, et al. The del Nido versus cold blood cardioplegia in aortic valve replacement: a randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;159(6):2275–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Gatti G, Benussi B, Currò P, Forti G, Rauber E, Minati A, et al. The risk of neurological dysfunctions after deep hypothermic circulatory arrest with retrograde cerebral perfusion. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;26(12):3009–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Su I-L, Wu VC-C, Chou A-H, Yang C-H, Chu P-H, Liu K-S, et al. Risk factor analysis of postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome after type A aortic dissection repair surgery: Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(29):e16303.

  14. 14.

    Duan L, Hu G-H, Jiang M, et al. Clinical characteristics and prognostic analysis of children with congenital heart disease complicated by postoperative acute kidney injury. Chin J Contemp Pediatr. 2017;19(11):1196–202.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Duan L, Hu G, Jiang M, Zhang C. Postoperative abnormal liver function in children with heart surgery. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2018;43(9):1007–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Niven D, Berthiaume LR, Fick L. Matched case-control studies: a review of reported statistical methodology. Clin Epidemiol. 2012;4:99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Matte GS, del Nido PJ. History and use of del Nido cardioplegia solution at Boston Children’s Hospital. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2012;44(3):98–103.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Gorgy A, Shore-Lesserson L. Del Nido cardioplegia should be used in all adults undergoing cardiac surgery: con. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019;33(6):1791–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Zhidkov IL, Belianko IE, Sitnichenko NV, Paliulina MV, Laptiĭ AV. Effect of perfusion volume of the Custodiol solution on the efficiency of cardioplegia in experiment. Anesteziol Reanimatol. 2008;5:42–7.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Guajardo Salinas GE, Nutt R, Rodriguez-Araujo G. Del Nido cardioplegia in low risk adults undergoing first time coronary artery bypass surgery. Perfusion. 2017;32(1):68–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ad N, Holmes SD, Massimiano PS, Rongione AJ, Fornaresio LM, Fitzgerald D. The use of del Nido cardioplegia in adult cardiac surgery: a prospective randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155(3):1011–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Gambardella I, Gaudino MFL, Antoniou GA, Rahouma M, Worku B, Tranbaugh RF, et al. Single- versus multidose cardioplegia in adult cardiac surgery patients: a meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;160(5):1195-1202.e12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Timek TA, Beute T, Robinson JA, Zalizadeh D, Mater R, Parker JL, et al. Del Nido cardioplegia in isolated adult coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;160(6):1479-1485.e5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Li Y, Lin H, Zhao Y, Li Z, Liu D, Wu X, et al. Del Nido cardioplegia for myocardial protection in adult cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ASAIO J. 2018;64(3):360–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Silva PL, Cruz FF, Fujisaki LC, Oliveira GP, Samary CS, Ornellas DS, et al. Hypervolemia induces and potentiates lung damage after recruitment maneuver in a model of sepsis-induced acute lung injury. Crit Care. 2010;14(3):R114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Koh TW, Gandhi S. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiographic assessment of acute prosthetic aortic valve regurgitation after mitral valve replacement: value of the deep transgastric long-axis view. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002;15(12):1538–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Flint AWJ, Bailey M, Reid CM, Smith JA, Tran L, Wood EM, et al. Preoperative identification of cardiac surgery patients at risk of receiving a platelet transfusion: the Australian Cardiac Surgery Platelet Transfusion (ACSePT) risk prediction tool. Transfusion (Paris). 2020;5(6):1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Bai S-J, Zeng B, Zhang L, Huang Z. Autologous platelet-rich plasmapheresis in cardiovascular surgery: a narrative review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019;1–8.

  29. 29.

    Yerebakan H, Sorabella RA, Najjar M, Castillero E, Mongero L, Beck J, et al. Del Nido Cardioplegia can be safely administered in high-risk coronary artery bypass grafting surgery after acute myocardial infarction: a propensity matched comparison. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-014-0141-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kim WK, Kim HR, Kim JB, Jung S-H, Choo SJ, Chung CH, et al. del Nido cardioplegia in adult cardiac surgery: beyond single-valve surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018;27(1):81–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(82100365), Fuqing Talent Training Plan(2019), and the Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Department (2018JJ6126,2021JJ31059). The study sponsors had no involvement in the study design,the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, the writing of the report, or the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LD collected, analyzed, interpreted the data and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. EW and GHH designed the study and supplied the Funding, reviewed and edited the manuscript. CLZ and LJH edited the figures and tables. YYD guided the statistical analysis. All authors read, reviewed and approved the final manuscript, and ensured that this is the case.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lian Duan or E. Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Medical ethics committee of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University (ID:2018081047). All methods of the study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and Chinese law. As the study was retrospective and used existing, routinely collected data, informed consent was waived with the consent of the Medical ethics committee of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1

. Subgroup analysis of myocardial injury markers between the DN group and the HTK group according to whether the aortic clamping time was greater than 120 min.

Additional file 2:

Supplementary instructions 1–6: 1. Inotropic grade; 2. SMDs before and after matching; 3. Pre-operative and some intra-operative characteristics of Subgroup patients; 4. Analysis of variance of repeated measurement data; 5. Adjusting some factors affecting postoperative severe arrhythmia; 6. Factors affecting platelet transfusion and adjusting these factors.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duan, L., Hu, Gh., Wang, E. et al. Del Nido versus HTK cardioplegia for myocardial protection during adult complex valve surgery: a retrospective study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 21, 604 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02411-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02411-w

Keywords

  • Single-dose cardioplegia
  • Return to spontaneous rhythm
  • ICU stay
  • Economic
  • Myocardial protection