Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control, in male South Asian immigrants in the United Arab Emirates: a cross-sectional study

  • Syed M Shah1Email author,
  • Tom Loney1,
  • Mohamud Sheek-Hussein1,
  • Mohamed El Sadig1,
  • Salma Al Dhaheri2,
  • Iffat El Barazi1,
  • Layla Al Marzouqi3,
  • Tar-Ching Aw1 and
  • Raghib Ali1
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders201515:30

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-015-0024-2

Received: 1 December 2014

Accepted: 20 April 2015

Published: 7 May 2015

Abstract

Background

South Asian males constitute the largest proportion of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) population. Minimal data is available on the prevalence of hypertension among South Asian immigrants in the UAE. We determined the prevalence, associated factors, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension among male South Asian immigrants from India, Pakistan and Bangladesh residing in the UAE.

Methods

We recruited a representative sample (n = 1375; 76.4 % participation rate) of South Asian adult (≥18 years) immigrant males, including Indian (n = 433), Pakistani (n = 383) and Bangladeshi (n = 559) nationalities in Al Ain, UAE (January-June 2012). Blood pressure, height, body mass, waist and hip circumference data were obtained using standard protocols. Information related to socio-demographics, lifestyle factors, history of diagnosis and treatment of hypertension was collected through a pilot-tested adapted version of the STEPS instrument, developed by the World Health Organization for the measurement of non-communicable disease risk factors at the country level .

Results

Mean age of participants was 34.0 years (95 % confidence interval (CI): 33.4, 34.5 years) and the overall prevalence of hypertension was 30.5 % (95 % CI 28.0, 32.8). In this study, 62 % of study participants had never had their blood pressure measured. Over three quarters (76 %) of the sample classified as hypertensive were not aware of their condition. Less than half (48.5 %) of the sample that were aware of their hypertension reported using antihypertensive medication and only 8.3 % had their hypertension under control (<140/90 mmHg). Hypertensive participants were more likely to be overweight (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.43; 95 % CI 1.01, 2.01); obese (AOR = 2.49; 95 % CI: 1.51, 4.10); have central obesity (AOR = 2.01; 95 % CI 1.37, 2.92); have a family history of hypertension (AOR = 1.51; 95 % CI 1.05, 2.17); and were less likely to walk 30 minutes daily (AOR = 1.79; 95 % CI 1.24, 2.60).

Conclusions

The prevalence of hypertension in a representative sample of young male South Asian immigrants living in the UAE was relatively high. However, the awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension within this population were very low. Strategies are urgently needed to improve the awareness and control of hypertension in this large population of migrant workers in the UAE.

Keywords

Blood Pressure Epidemiology Ethnic Variations Hypertension Non-Communicable Disease South Asians Transients And Migrants United Arab Emirates

Background

High blood pressure, followed by elevated blood glucose, obesity, and abnormal plasma lipids levels are the major modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular mortality in both developed and developing countries [1]. Globally, approximately 17 million deaths a year are associated with cardiovascular diseases and complications related to hypertension account for over 50 % (≈9.4 million) of these deaths [2]. In adults, an increase of 20 mm Hg in usual systolic blood pressure (SBP) or 10 mmHg in usual diastolic blood pressure (DBP) is associated with more than a twofold increase in stroke death rates and a twofold increase in the mortality rates from ischemic heart disease and other cardiovascular causes [3]. In addition, a significant proportion of adults with hypertension have found to be unaware of their hypertension [4]. Indeed, studies have shown that the morbidity and mortality associated with hypertension can be significantly reduced by increasing awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension [5].

Previous studies have shown that South Asian populations (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Nepal) contribute the highest proportion of the burden of cardiovascular diseases compared with any other region globally [6]. In addition, risk factors for myocardial infarction, hypertension and type 2 diabetes are developed at a lower age in South Asians than in other ethnic groups [7, 8]. Moreover, South Asian migrants living in other countries had higher death rates from coronary heart disease at relatively younger ages compared to the local population [9, 10].

The United Arab Emirates (UAE) has experienced significant economic, industrial, and population growth, for the last few years. Expatriates account for 80 percent of the UAE population and about two-thirds of the immigrant population are South Asian migrant workers from India, Pakistan and Bangladesh [11]. The majority of South Asian immigrants are unskilled males with low literacy levels, working in low salary jobs, separated from their families in their home country, and living in large labour camps (shared accommodation). Consequently, many of these male South Asian workers suffer from stress, anxiety and depression [12]. Additionally, studies of migrant populations in economically developed countries showed that exposure to environmental factors and a transition in lifestyle may place immigrants at a higher risk for developing metabolic risk factors (e.g. hypertension) for cardiovascular diseases [13, 14]. These studies provide evidence to support the notion of a Healthy Migrant Effect seen in Western countries where upon arrival, immigrants are healthier than the native population; however, their health status declines as the duration of their stay increases. Currently, there is a lack of information on the status of risk factors for cardiovascular diseases including hypertension in the South Asian population living in the UAE. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of hypertension, its correlates and the level of awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension among male immigrants from India, Pakistan and Bangladesh residing in the UAE.

Methods

Study Design

This study employed a cross-sectional design. Ethical approval was obtained from both the Al Ain Medical District Human Research Ethics Committee, and the Abu Dhabi Ambulatory Healthcare Services Research Committee. Informed written consent was taken from participants.

Setting

All expatriate workers seeking employment in the UAE are required by federal law to undergo a communicable disease screening test (i.e. tuberculosis by chest X-ray and human immunodeficiency virus by serology), at a government visa screening centre before receiving a residency visa. Expatriates are required to undergo a repeat screening test to renew their visa after three years. Study participants were recruited from the only Disease Prevention and Screening Centre in the city of Al Ain (eastern region of Abu Dhabi, UAE) between January and June 2012.

Participants and Study Size

In the year 2012, a total of 181231 male immigrants visited the Disease Prevention and Screening Centre (DPSC) in the city of Al Ain to obtain or renew a visa [15]. The sample size of this study was based on the need to explore differences among subgroups. A difference of 1/3 standard deviation in continuous measures such as blood pressure will usually include all levels of public health interest. For a significance level of 5 % and a power of 80 % we would need 144 per group in a two-equal group comparison. We estimated a sample size of 1800 to be adequate to address the primary research question and the majority of the other research questions. We did not include females as they constitute less than 15 % of South Asian immigrants who visit the DPSC to obtain or renew an existing residency visa. Our sampling frame included a list of male expatriate workers from India, Pakistan and Bangladesh who enrolled for medical examination at the only DPSC visa screening centre in Al Ain. In this study we invited every third migrant worker from India, Pakistan and Bangladesh who visited the DPSC in Al Ain for the screening examination to obtain a new or renew an existing visa between January and June 2012 to participate in the study. Of the 1800 eligible participants, 1375 (76.4 %) participated in the study. A substantial number (23.6 %) of eligible migrant workers did not participate due to time constraints as their number was called to complete other visa related medical tests.

Measurements and Definitions

The study consent forms and questionnaires were written in both Urdu and Bengali. The questionnaire was initially developed in English, and then forward translated to Urdu and Bengali. The questionnaire was then pretested in a pilot study and finalized after necessary amendments. The questionnaire comprised an adapted version of the “STEPS Methodology”, developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) for the measurement and surveillance of non-communicable disease (NCD) risk factors at the country level [16]. Due to the low literacy rates among the South Asian expatriate population in the UAE, all questionnaires were conducted in Urdu or Bengali and interview-led by a native Urdu or Bengali speaking research assistant trained to administer the questionnaire. The questionnaire interview collected information including demographic characteristics, modifiable lifestyle risk factors including tobacco use, alcohol consumption, physical activity, family and personal disease history, home country residence setting (rural, urban, semi-urban), occupation, monthly salary in UAE dirhams (AED; AED 1.00 ≈ USD 3.65) , years lived in the UAE, current type of accommodation, history of current and past cigarette smoking and tobacco chewing, and history of exposure to second-hand tobacco. We classified monthly earning into bottom quartile (AED <900 per month), second quartile (AED 900 to <1200), third quartile (AED 1200 to 2000), and top quartile (AED >2000).

Subjects were classified as current smokers if they answered yes to the question, “do you smoke cigarettes daily”. Former smokers were defined as having smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their lifetime. Ever smokers included current and former smokers. The variable relating to alcohol was based on the question, “did you drink any alcohol during the last 12 months?” The variables used for the analysis were smoking, use of smokeless tobacco, and alcohol consumption during the last year. Information on physical activity was obtained using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-short version) [17].

All the research staff members successfully completed a training program that familiarized them with the study objectives, design and methodology. We followed the 1999 World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension guidelines to measure blood pressure (BP) [18]. Resting brachial BP was measured using a calibrated automated device (Omron HEM-705cp) in sitting position using the right upper arm and an appropriate sized cuff after a period of five minutes rest. The average of the two measures taken was used for analyses. Hypertension was defined as a mean systolic ≥ BP 140, a mean diastolic BP ≥90 or current hypertension treatment with prescription medication (an affirmative response to the question to the following sequence of questions: “Has a doctor ever told you that you had high blood pressure?”; “Because of your high blood pressure, have ever been told to take prescribed medicine?”; and “Are you now taking prescribed medicine for the last two days?” Awareness of hypertension was defined by participant self-report of any previous hypertension diagnosis by a health care professional. Treatment of hypertension was defined as taking antihypertensive drugs within the last two days prior to the interview. Hypertension was considered as controlled among those on treatment if the average BP was ≤140/90 mmHg.

Body mass was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg using a calibrated electronic scale with a mounted stadiometer that was used to measure height to the nearest 0.1 cm (SECA Hamburg, Germany). Body mass and height measurements were completed with the participant wearing light clothing without shoes and standing motionless. Waist and hip circumference were measured using a flexible, non-stretch nylon tape measure (SECA Hamburg, Germany) while subjects were lightly clothed. Waist circumference was measured midway between the lower rib margin and the top of the iliac crest, in centimeters (cm) to the nearest 0.1 cm. Hip circumference was measured at the point of maximal protrusion of the gluteal muscles to the nearest 0.1 cm. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as body mass in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. World Health Organization cut-offs were used to classify overweight (25.0-29.9 kg/m [2]) and obese (≥30.0 kg/m [2]) adults [19]. We used a waist-to-hip ratio (WHR; waist in cm/hip circumference in cm) ≥0.90 to define central obesity in our male population [20]. The WHO world reference population was used in calculating age-standardized hypertension prevalence rates [21]. In addition, we collected a non-fasting venous blood sample to measure glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels in a random sub-sample (n = 99) of the study population. The WHO cut-off of HbA1c ≥ 6.5 % was used to indicate the presence of diabetes mellitus in the sub-sample.

Statistical Analysis

Data were entered on a computer with the Microsoft Access software and then imported into Stata version 11.0 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX) for analysis. Percentages, means and their 95 % confidence intervals were calculated for descriptive purposes. Chi-squared test were conducted for categorical variables and analyses of variance were conducted for continuous variables. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association of socio-demographic, lifestyle and other factors with the odds of hypertension and hypertension awareness. Due to the small sample size we could not conduct multivariable analysis for treatment and control. Two-tailed p-values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. We included monthly income, education, occupation, residence, smoking and alcohol status as potential confounding variables in our final multivariable model (Table 3).

Results

Out of 1800 eligible males, 1375 (76.4 %) participated, from India (n = 433), Pakistan (n = 383) and Bangladesh (n = 559). The mean age of study population was 34.0 years (95 % confidence interval (CI): 33.4, 34.5). Table 1a and b show the general characteristics of the study population. Compared to Indian and Pakistani immigrant workers, Bangladeshis were younger and a higher proportion (60.4 %) earned less than AED 1000 per month compared to Indians (20.6 %) and Pakistanis (32.3 %). Bangladeshis and Pakistanis were less educated than Indians (only 13.5 % had college or university level education compared to 31.7 %, respectively). Over two-thirds of the study participants (68.0 %, 95 % CI 66.1, 71.1) were from a rural/village background in their home countries and the majority (70.0 %) of the immigrants were married with an average of three children. More than half (52.2 %) shared accommodation with non-relatives and the remaining participants reported either residing with their sponsor (13.4 %), in single accommodation (11.1 %), in labor camps (12.2 %) or with family members (11.1 %). The majority (55.1 %) of participants had been living in UAE for more than six years. The most common occupational categories of the immigrants included driver (23.1 %), laborer (17.1 %), agriculture worker (17.1 %), construction worker (12.5 %) and sales man (5.7 %).
Table 1

Characteristics of the South Asian Immigrants in Abu Dhabi, UAE 2012

Characteristics

India (n = 433)

Pakistan (n = 383)

Bangladesh (n = 559)

p

a

    

Age-years (mean)

36.3 (35.3, 37.2)

34.8 (33.7, 35.9)

31.7 (31.0, 32.5)

0.000

Age group-years (%)

    

18-35 (years)

50.0 (48.7, 51.3)

59.6 (54.4, 64.7)

71.1 (66.3, 75.7)

0.000

36-45 (years)

28.1 (23.5, 32.7)

20.5 (16.4, 24.9)

20.8 (16.7, 25.1)

 

46+ (years)

21.9 (17.8, 26.3)

19.9 (15.8, 24.2)

8.1 (5.1, 11.1)

 

Education (%)

    

None

3.1 (1.6, 5.0)

23.9 (19.6, 28.4)

12.9 (10.2, 15.9)

0.000

Primary or middle

23.3 (19.2, 27.6)

31.4 (26.7, 36.2)

46.0 (41.7, 50.2)

 

Secondary or high school

36.9 (32.2, 41.7)

28.3 (23.7, 33.1)

27.6 (23.8, 31.5)

 

College or university

36.7 (31.7, 41.5)

16.4 (12.7, 20.4)

13.5 (6.6, 22.3)

 

Income – AED (%)

    

Bottom quartile

13.5 (10.4, 16.8)

17.2 (7.7, 21.2)

44.2 (13.6, 48.3)

0.000

Second quartile

19.8 (16.2, 23.7)

21.1 (8.6, 25.4)

22.0 (8.9, 25.5)

 

Third quartile

39.5 (34.9, 44.1)

28.2 (10.2, 32.8)

21.5 (8.8, 25.0)

 

Top quartile

27.2 (23.2, 31.5)

33.4 (11.4, 38.2)

12.3 (6.4, 15.2)

 

Immigrated from a rural village (%)

64.3 (59.3, 69.1)

56.7 (51.3, 61.9)

83.2 (79.7, 86.3)

 

Married (%)

78.5 (74.1, 82.5)

75.3 (70.5, 79.7)

60.1 (55.7, 64.3)

 

Do not live with immediate family (%)

88.6 (85.0, 91.6)

88.4 (84.7, 91.6)

81.0 (77.4, 84.3)

 

Type of accommodation (%)

    

Shared with non-relatives

51.4 (46.4, 56.3)

41.1 (36.1, 46.2)

58.6 (54.5, 62.8)

0.000

Shared with family

10.5 (7.6, 13.7)

15.0 (11.8, 19.3)

7.8 (5.6, 10.2)

 

Single accommodation

13.3 (10.1, 16.8)

11.1 (8.1, 14.5)

8.9 (6.6, 11.5)

 

Live with sponsor

13.3 (10.1, 16.8)

16.7 (13.0, 20.7)

12.2 (9.5, 15.1)

 

Live in a labor camp

11.5 (8.5, 14.8)

16.1 (12.5, 20.1)

12.4 (9.7, 15.3)

 

Years in UAE (%)

    

Up to 1 year

11.2 (8.1, 14.6)

10.5 (7.4, 14.1)

10.3 (7.6, 13.3)

0.000

2 to 5 years

31.3 (26.6, 36.2)

30.5 (25.5, 35.7)

38.6 (34.1, 43.2)

 

6 to 10 years

21.2 (17.1, 25.6)

17.1 (13.1, 21.4)

23.1 (19.3, 27.1)

 

>10 years

36.3 (31.4, 41.3)

41.9 (36.5, 47.4)

28.0 (23.9, 32.2)

 

b

    

Occupation (%)

    

Driver

21.5 (17.5, 25.7)

33.9 (29.1, 38.8)

19.2 (16.0, 22.7)

0.000

Laborer

14.1 (10.8, 17.2)

12.8 (9.5,16.4)

20.3 (17.0, 23.8)

 

Construction worker

12.6 (9.5, 16.1)

8.3 (5.7, 11.4)

13.1 (10.4, 16.1)

 

Agriculture worker

8.2 (5.6,11.1)

25.0 (20.7, 29.6)

20.5 (17.2, 24.1)

 

Salesman

12.6 (9.5, 16.1)

3.1 (1.6, 5.1)

3.3 (2.2, 5.4)

 

Professional, office worker

10.8 (7.9, 14.1)

6.7 (4.4, 9.5)

3.6 (2.2, 5.4)

 

Business shop keeper

5.4 (3.4, 7.8)

4.2 (2.4, 6.5)

4.0 (2.5, 5.8)

 

Hospitality worker (cook, waiter)

8.2 (5.7, 11.1)

0.8 (0.5, 11.0)

6.5 (4.6, 8.8)

 

Tailor

3.6 (1.9, 5.7)

1.9 (0.7, 3.5)

6.8 (4.8, 9.1)

 

Other

3.1 (1.6, 5.0)

3.3 (1.7, 5.4)

2.7 (1.5, 4.3)

 

Family history of hypertension (%)

14.8 (11.4, 18.8)

15.0 (11.5, 19.1)

23.2 (19.6, 27.1)

0.001

Family history of diabetes (%)

15.9 (12.4, 19.9)

8.1 (5.5, 11.4)

8.9 (6.6. 11.7)

0.000

Body mass index – kg/m [2] (mean)

31.5 (21.1, 41.9)

26.6 (25.1, 27.9)

26.2 (24.2, 28.2)

0.000

Waist-to-hip ratio (mean)

0.93 (0.92, 0.94)

0.93 (0.92, 0.94)

0.92 (0.90, 0.93)

0.033

Waist circumference – cm (mean)

89.5 (88.5, 90.5)

92.9 (90.8, 93.5)

85.6 (84.7, 86.6)

0.000

Smoking (%)

34.3 (29.6, 39.3)

35.8 (30.1, 41.0)

49.1 (44.7, 53.4)

0.000

Smokeless tobacco (%)

5.2 (3.1, 7.9)

11.1 (8.0, 14.9)

15.6 (12.6, 19.1)

0.000

Exposure to second hand tobacco (%)

40.7 (35.8, 45.8)

49.7 (44.4, 55.0)

46.7 (42.4, 51.1)

0.000

Drinking alcohol – ever (%)

20.1 (16.1, 24.4)

3.1 (1.6, 5.5)

7.8 (5.6, 10.4)

0.000

Walk 7 days a week (%)

81.1 (76.7, 84.9)

85.9 (81.9, 89.4)

77.2 (73.3, 80.8)

0.006

Reported vigorous physical activity (%)

17.1 (13.5, 20.6)

18.8 (14.8, 22.7)

18.6 (15.4, 21.8)

0.774

Reported moderate physical activity (%)

20.5 (16.7, 24.4)

18.9 (14.8, 22.7)

37.0 (33.1, 41.0)

0.000

BP measurement – never (%)

57.3 (51.9, 62.4)

62.7 (57.2, 67.9)

68.8 (64.0, 73.2)

0.004

Hypertension (%)

34.5 (30.1, 39.1)

28.2 (23.6, 32.7)

28.8 (25.0, 32.6)

0.073

Physician diagnosed diabetes (%)

10.8 (7.9, 13.8)

6.5 (4.0, 9.0)

6.8 (4.7, 8.9)

0.030

HbA1c ≥ 6.5 %

11.6 (1.6, 21.6)

4.3 (−0.4, 13.4)

9.1 (1.2, 19.4)

0.618

Systolic Blood Pressure – mmHg (mean)

132.6 (130.9, 134.4)

129.2 (127.4, 131.0)

129.1 (127.7, 130.5)

0.003

Diastolic Blood Pressure – mmHg (mean)

79.6 (78.4, 80.8)

75.9 (74.7, 77.2)

76.7 (75.6, 77.7)

0.000

On average, Indians had a higher BMI (31.5 kg/m [2]) compared to Pakistanis (26.6 kg/m [2]) and Bangladeshis (26.2 kg/m [2]). Bangladeshis reported a higher rate of smoking (49.1 %) compared to their Indian (34.3 %) and Pakistani (35.8 %) counterparts. In this study, over half of participants (61.6 % 95 % CI 58.8, 64.4 %), had never had their blood pressure measured and nearly a third of all South Asian males had hypertension (n = 419; 30.5 %; 95 % CI 28.0, 32.9). The overall age-standardized prevalence of hypertension was 34.2 % (95 % CI 31.7, 36.5). The crude prevalence of hypertension varied by the nationality, 34.6 % (95 % CI 30.2, 39.3) in Indians, 28.2 % (95 % CI 23.7, 32.9) in Pakistanis, and 28.8 % (95 % CI 25.1, 32.7) in Bangladeshi immigrants. The age-standardized prevalence of hypertension was 35.7 % (95 % CI 31.2, 40.3) in Indians, 31.3 % (95 % CI 24.8, 38.2) in Pakistanis, and 33.9 % (30.0, 37.8) in Bangladeshi participants.

Only a quarter of participants (n = 99; 23.6 %) classified as hypertensive were aware of their condition and the prevalence of hypertension awareness varied by nationality. The prevalence of awareness was 22.0 % (95 % CI 15.6, 29.4) among Indians, 28.3 % (95 % CI 19.9, 37.8) among Pakistanis and 23.1 % (95 % CI 16.7, 30.4) among Bangladeshis. Of those aware of hypertension, 48 (48.5 %) reported use of antihypertensive drugs in the past two days and only 4 (8.3 %) had their hypertension under control (<140/90 mmHg).

Table 2 show the prevalence of hypertension and awareness and the factors correlated with hypertension prevalence and awareness. The prevalence of hypertension was higher in Indians compared to Pakistani and Bangladeshi immigrants. Hypertension prevalence was lower among those with no formal schooling compared to their literate counters parts. Prevalence of hypertension also varied by occupational category and the lowest prevalence (23.3 %) was noted among agricultural workers and the highest prevalence (40.0 %) among those who were shop keepers or salesmen. The prevalence was lower in people who came from rural villages and was higher among those who had been in UAE for more than 10 years. The prevalence was higher among those who were married, overweight or obese, or had central obesity or did not walk for at least 30 minutes a day. Similarly, hypertensive participants were more likely to be aware of their condition if their age was greater than 35 years, had a higher monthly salary, worked as a hospitality worker, had been in UAE for more than five years, were married, overweight and obese, or had a central obesity.
Table 2

Prevalence and crude odds ratios (COR) of factors associated with hypertension prevalence and awareness, in South Asian Immigrants, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 2012 (n = 1,375)

  

Hypertension

  

Awareness

  

Characteristics

All

n (%)

COR (95 % CI)

P

n (%)

COR (95 % CI)

P

Nationality

       

India

433

150 (34.6)

1.0

 

33 (22.0)

1.0

 

Pakistan

383

108 (28.2)

0.74 (0.55, 0.99)

0.049

30 (28.3)

1.35 (0.76, 2.39)

0.250

Bangladesh

559

161 (28.8)

0.76 (0.58, 0.99)

0.049

36 (23.1)

1.02 (0.60, 1.76)

0.822

Age group

       

18-35 years

810

179 (22.1)

1.0

 

19 (10.9)

1.0

1.000

36-45 years

307

115 (37.5)

2.11 (1.58, 2.81)

0.000

26 (23.2)

2.45 (1.28, 4.68)

0.007

46+ years

200

111 (55.5)

4.39 (3.18, 6.08)

0.000

51 (46.8)

7.13 (3.88, 13.08)

0.000

Monthly income

      

Bottom quartile

371

94 (25.3)

1.0

 

13 (13.9)

1.0

 

Second quartile

290

89 (30.7)

1.30 (0.92, 1.83)

0.13

21 (12.1)

1.96 (0.91, 4.210

0.085

Third quartile

399

132 (33.1)

1.46 (1.06, 1.99)

0.02

33 (25.8)

2.13 (1.05, 4.33)

0.035

Top quartile

315

104 (33.0)

1.45 (1.04, 2.02)

0.03

32 (30.8)

2.73 (1.33, 5.61)

0.006

Education

       

No formal schooling

173

35 (20.2)

0.61 (0.36, 1.01

0.06

5 (14.3)

0.68 (0.20, 2.33)

0.548

Primary or middle

473

149 (31.5)

1.09 (0.72, 1.66)

0.653

40 (27.4)

1.15 (0.66, 3.65)

0.310

Secondary or high school

586

192 (32.7)

1.16 (0.77, 1.74)

0.459

46 (24.5)

1.33 (0.57, 3.09

0.499

College or university

139

41 (29.5)

1.0

 

8 (19.5)

1.0

 

Occupation

       

Driver

317

94 (29.6)

1.38 (0.94, 2.04)

0.097

29 (30.8)

2.97 (1.30, 6.79)

0.010

Laborer

234

71 (30.3)

1.43 (0.95, 2.16)

0.086

9 (13.0)

1.0

 

Construction worker

172

64 (37.2)

1.95 (1.26, 3.00

0.002

11 (17.7)

1.43 (0.55, 3.74)

0.457

Agriculture worker

236

55 (23.3)

1.0

1.0

11 (21.1)

1.79 (0.68, 4.70)

0.238

Salesman

79

26 (32.9)

1.61 (0.92, 2.82)

0.092

9 (34.6)

3.52 (1.21, 10.28)

0.021

Professional, office worker

95

29 (30.5)

1.44 (0.85, 2.45)

0.173

7 (23.3)

2.02 (0.67, 6.08)

0.207

Business/shop keeper

60

24 (40.0)

2.19 (1.21, 3.99)

0.010

7 (29.2)

2.74 (0.89, 8.45)

0.079

Hospitality worker

71

19 (26.8)

1.20 (0.65, 2.20)

0.551

8 (42.1)

4.85 (1.54, 15.29)

0.007

Tailor

70

24 (34.3)

1.72 (0.96, 3.06)

0.067

4 (16.7)

1.33 (0.37, 4.80)

0.660

Other

40

12 (30.0)

1.41 (0.67, 2.96)

0.363

4 (36.4)

3.80 (0.92, 15.67)

0.064

Type of accommodation

      

Shared with non-relatives

717

232 (32.4)

1.75 (1.17, 2.62)

0.006

55 (23.9)

1.52 (0.59, 3.84)

0.378

Shared with family

152

44 (28.9)

1.49 (0.89, 2.48)

0.122

14 (31.8)

2.25 (0.76, 6.67)

0.141

Single accommodation

153

60 (39.2)

2.36 (1.44, 3.86)

0.001

16 (28.1)

1.89 (0.66, 5.40)

0.237

Live with sponsor

184

46 (25.0)

1.22 (0.74, 2.01)

0.429

8 (17.8)

1.04 (0.32, 3.35)

0.941

Live in a labor camp

168

36 (21.3)

1.0

 

6 (17.1)

1.0

 

Home country setting

       

Rural

932

269 (28.9)

1.0

 

59 (22.3)

1.0

 

Urban or semi-urban

426

149 (34.9)

1.32 (1.01, 1.69)

0.02

40 (27.4)

1.32 (0.82, 2.09)

0.245

Length of stay in UAE

      

1 to 5 years

547

137 (25.1)

1.0

 

9 (6.7)

1.0

 

6 to 10 years

257

78 (30.8)

1.32 (0.94, 1.81)

0.11

19 (25.3)

4.75 (2.02, 11.15)

0.000

>10 years

414

178 (43.0)

2.26 (1.71, 2.96)

0.000

71 (40.1)

9.38 (4.47, 19.65)

0.000

Marital status

       

Single

412

83 (20.1)

1.0

 

5 (6.3)

1.0

 

Married

963

336 (34.9)

2.12 (1.61, 2.79)

0.000

94 (28.2)

1.82 (2.28, 14.85)

0.000

Body mass index – kg/m [2]

      

<25.0

758

170 (22.4)

1.0

 

28 (16.8)

1.0

 

25.0 - 29.9

486

182 (37.4)

2.07 (1.61, 2.66)

0.000

46 (25.7)

1.72 (1.01, 2.91)

0.044

≥30.0

129

66 (51.2)

3.62 (2.46, 5.32)

0.000

24 (36.9)

2.91 (1.52, 5.55)

0.001

Waist-to-hip ratio

       

<0.90 cm

503

84 (16.7)

1.0

 

8 (9.8)

1.0

 

≥0.90 cm

872

335 (38.4)

3.11 (2.37, 4.08)

0.000

91 (27.6)

3.52 (1.63, 7.59)

0.001

Waist circumference – cm

      

Waist < 94

925

234 (25.3)

1.0

 

40 (17.4)

1.0

 

Waist ≥ 94

450

185 (44.1)

2.06 (1.62, 2.62)

0.000

59 (32.4)

2.28 (1.44, 3.61)

0.000

Smoking ever

       

Never

827

254 (30.7)

1.0

 

50 (20.0)

1.0

 

Ever

548

165 (30.1)

0.97 (0.76, 1.22)

0.81

49 (30.2)

1.73 (1.09, 2.73)

0.081

Smokeless tobacco

      
 

1162

346 (29.8)

1.0

 

83 (24.5)

1.0

 

Ever

150

53 (35.3)

1.29 (0.90, 1.84)

0.17

12 (23.1)

0.92 (0.46, 1.85)

0.826

Drinking alcohol

       

Never

1119

302 (26.9)

1.0

 

82 (27.4)

1.0

 

Ever

130

45 (34.6)

1.43 (0.97, 2.10)

0.07

10 (22.2)

0.75 (0.35, 1.59)

0.670

Walk for at least 30 minutes daily

       

Yes

1018

267 (26.2)

1.0

 

65 (25.0)

1.0

 

No

314

134 (42.7)

2.09 (1.61, 2.72)

0.002

33 (24.8)

0.99 (0.61, 1.60)

0.463

Family history of hypertension

       

No

887

223 (25.1)

1.0

 

52 (23.5)

1.0

 

Yes

249

91 (36.5)

1.71 (1.27, 2.31)

0.000

38 (43.2)

2.47 (1.46, 4.17)

0.001

Known diabetic

       

No

1261

358 (28.4)

1.0

 

66 (18.7)

1.0

 

Yes

114

61 (53.5)

2.90 (1.97, 4.28)

0.000

33 (55.0)

5.29 (2.98, 9.41)

0.000

Table 3

Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) of factors correlated with hypertension prevalence, awareness, in South Asian Immigrants Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 2012 (n = 1,375)

 

Hypertension

 

Awareness

 

Characteristics

AOR (95 % CI)

p

AOR (95 % CI)

p

Nationality

    

India

1.0

 

1.0

 

Pakistan

1.17 (0.74, 1.86)

0.496

2.40 (0.89, 6.49)

0.084

Bangladesh

0.98 (0.64, 1.50)

0.930

1.65 (0.62, 4.31)

0.310

Age group

    

18-35 years

1.0

 

1.0

 

36-45 years

1.82 (1.17, 2.85)

0.008

1.25 (0.43, 3.61)

0.675

46+ years

4.76 (2.78, 8.13)

<0.001

4.31 (1.32, 14.05)

0.015

Monthly income – AED

1.00 (0.99, 1.01

0.873

  

Education

    

No formal schooling

0.65 (0.26, 1.59)

0.593

0.52 (0.06, 4.55)

0.554

Primary or middle

1.22 (0.58, 2.56)

0.825

1.52 (0.32, 7.30)

0.596

Secondary or high school

1.27 (0.64, 2.49)

0.482

1.82 (0.43, 7.57)

0.408

College or university

1.0

 

1.0

 

Occupation

    

Driver

0.84 (0.49, 1.44)

0.670

2.54 (0.62, 10.45)

0.197

Laborer

1.03 (0.57, 1.88)

0.918

1.0

 

Construction worker

1.19 (0.60, 2.37)

0.616

1.46 (0.31, 6.96)

0.634

Agriculture worker

1.0

 

0.81 (0.17, 3.81)

0.790

Salesman

1.89 (0.88, 4.04)

0.099

3.01 (0.64, 14.16)

0.162

Professional, office worker

1.28 (0.55, 3.01)

0.562

0.94 (0.14, 6.21)

0.952

Business/shop keeper

1.02 (0.40, 2.57)

0.968

1.21 (0.20, 7.29)

0.831

Hospitality worker

0.88 (0.38, 2.04)

0.766

5.99 (0.81, 44.08)

0.079

Tailor

0.55 (0.19, 1.64)

0.286

0.61 (0.04, 8.77)

0.717

Other

0.94 (0.33, 2.64)

0.903

2.11 (0.22, 19.78)

0.513

Type of accommodation

   

Shared with non-relatives

1.22 (0.71, 2.11)

0.469

2.54 (0.62, 10.45)

0.197

Shared with family

0.92 (0.43, 1.96)

0.837

1.19 (0.21, 6.68)

0.846

Single accommodation

1.32 (0.66, 2.64)

0.433

1.78 (0.36, 8.86)

0.477

Live with sponsor

1.16 (0.59, 2.27)

0.670

0.77 (0.14, 4.02)

0.754

Live in a labor camp

1.0

 

1.0

 

Length of stay in UAE

    

1 to 5 years

1.0

 

1.0

 

6 to 10 years

0.97 (0.61, 1.53)

0.890

5.47 (1.65, 18.23)

0.006

>10 years

1.04 (0.65, 1.67)

0.865

4.35 (1.32, 14.39)

0.016

Body mass index – kg/m [2]

   

<25.0

1.0

 

1.0

 

25.0-29.9

1.51 (1.04, 2.19)

0.030

1.22 (0.53, 2.84)

0.629

≥30.0

2.39 (1.38, 4.16)

0.002

1.23 (0.42, 3.62)

0.703

Waist-to-hip ratio

    

<0.90 cm

1.0

 

1.0

 

≥0.90 cm

1.78 (1.18, 2.69)

0.006

3.01 (0.96, 9.64)

0.058

Smoking ever

    

Never

1.0

   

Ever

0.90 (0.64, 1.27)

0.560

0.94 (0.46, 1.94)

0.880

Drinking alcohol

    

Never

1.0

 

1.0

 

Ever

1.49 (0.89, 2.48)

0.123

0.90 (0.32, 2.54)

0.847

Walk for at least 30 minutes daily

    

Yes

1.0

 

1.0

 

No

1.72 (1.15, 2.58)

0.008

1.22 (0.97, 5.08)

0.059

Family history of hypertension

    

No

1.0

 

1.0

 

Yes

1.56 (1.05, 2.32)

0.029

4.91 (2.09, 11.55)

<0.001

Known diabetic

    

No

1.0

 

1.0

 

Yes

1.23 (0.72, 2.08)

0.443

5.76 (2.21, 15.00)

<0.001

Table 3 shows the factors correlated with prevalence and awareness of hypertension, after adjusting for the potential confounders including age, income, education, occupation, residency, cigarette smoking and alcohol use. Independent risk factors for hypertension included increase in age over 35 years, overweight and obesity, central obesity, lower levels of physical activity, and family history of hypertension. However, the difference in prevalence of hypertension was not statistically significant across occupational categories. We did not find a statistically significant increase in the prevalence of hypertension among immigrants as the duration of their stay increased. We noted that the awareness increased with increase in the duration of residency for more than five years in the UAE, having a family history of hypertension, and if the participant had been diagnosed with diabetes (Table 3).

Discussion

The prevalence of hypertension in our sample of young South Asian adult immigrant males was higher than published estimates in home countries: India (34.6 % versus 22.8 %) [22], Pakistan (28.2 % versus 18.0 %) [23] and Bangladesh (28.8 % versus 11.3 %) [24]. The overall prevalence of hypertension in the study population (30.5 %) was also higher than the native Emirati population (14.0 %) and in Arab immigrants (21.9 %) during same the study year [25]. The prevalence of hypertension among study participants aged 46 years and older was particularly high (55.5 %) compared to a recent study that reported sex-specific and age-specific prevalence of hypertension in representative population samples from all over the world [26]. In this study Kearney and colleagues reported lower age-specific prevalence rates of hypertension for men aged 40–49 years and 50–59 years from India (24.8 % and 32.6 %), Egypt and Turkey (26.1 % and 37.2 %), Sub Saharan Africa (38.5 % and 48.1 %), and an aggregated rate for USA, Canada and Japan (32.6 % and 44.8 %) grouped as established market economies. Our study findings fill an important gap in the literature pertaining to migrant worker health; namely, local estimates of chronic disease risk factors (viz. hypertension) among immigrant populations residing in the UAE. Prevalence statistics are vital for researchers, practitioners, and policy makers that are interested in surveillance, screening and developing cost-effective interventions for this at-risk population.

Our findings are in agreement with other studies [27] reporting that among the three nationalities Indians had the highest mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure and prevalence rates of hypertension, followed by Pakistanis and then Bangladeshis. In the present study, both overall obesity (indexed by BMI) and central obesity were strongly associated with an increased prevalence of hypertension. After adjustment of confounding variables, the study showed a significant relationship between hypertension and advancing age, lower levels of physical activity, obesity, central obesity, and family history of hypertension. These findings are in agreement with several other studies [2830]. Alarmingly, 76 % of participants classified as hypertensive were not aware of their condition and 62 % of study participants had never had their blood pressure examined. The lack of awareness in the study population compares with home-country populations in India (46.7 %) [31], Pakistan (70.0 %) [23] and Bangladesh (62.0 %) [32]. A clinic-based study in Al Ain showed that under-diagnosis of hypertension among non-Emiratis was much more common than UAE nationals [33]. In our study treatment and control of hypertension was very low. This underscores the urgent need for strategies to reduce inadequate control of hypertension. A high proportion (68 %) of participants had a rural background and studies have shown that people with rural background and low socioeconomic status have limited access to medical care resulting in poor control of blood pressure [34, 35].

Our findings suggest that the assessment of common risk factors for NCDs such as body mass and blood pressure measurement should be considered for inclusion in the battery of tests required as part of the medical examination at the time of applying or renewing visas for immigrants in the UAE. In this study, there was a high prevalence of hypertension awareness among those who had a family history of hypertension, those who were diabetic, and those who had lived in UAE for five or more. Previous research has shown that familial history of high blood pressure in a first-degree relative increases the likelihood by about twofold that an individual will have high blood pressure [36]. The high rate of awareness among diabetics is probably because they receive more frequent contact with primary health care providers [37]. Although a basic health insurance system has been developed for the working population in the UAE, a significant proportion of the study population, particularly those who have been in UAE for less than five years remained unaware of their hypertension status. In this study, of those aware of their hypertension, less than half reported use of antihypertensive drugs in the past two days and of these only 8.3 % had their hypertension controlled to 140/90 mm Hg or below. Treatment and control of hypertension is crucial for reducing cardiovascular death rates as the study population is already prone to developing coronary heart disease at a younger age (<40 in men) [38] and have a 3- to 5-fold increase in the risk for myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death compared with other ethnic groups [39, 40]. As such, there should be more emphasis on improving the provision of primary health care services to South Asians living in the UAE coupled with educational campaigns to encourage people to check their BP more regularly, particularly if they have familial history of hypertension and/or diabetes.

Limitations of the study

There a number of study limitations that needs to be acknowledged. Firstly, the cross sectional design does not permit a causal relationship between risk factors and hypertension. Secondly, we recruited the sample in the only visa screening centre in the city of Al Ain (Abu Dhabi Emirate). However, we would not expect the socioeconomic and lifestyle characteristics of the study population to differ from South Asian male immigrants living in other Emirates of the UAE. Due to funding limitation we did not measure lipid levels and only measured HbA1c levels in a small sub-sample (n = 99) of study population. We have included current medication as taking medicine in the last two days instead of daily. Other studies have similarly included those taking medications less than daily [41]. Nonetheless; this is the first population-based study to report the prevalence of hypertension among a representative sample of South Asian male immigrants living in the UAE.

Conclusions

Our study revealed a high prevalence of hypertension among a relatively young South Asian male immigrant population living in the UAE. Based on the findings of our study, we would like to recommend that blood pressure, height and body mass measurements should be included in the medical screening tests at the time of obtaining or renewing a residency visa for expatriates living in the UAE. Population-based public health interventions targeting the maintenance of a healthy body size (both total and central adiposity), coupled with regular assessment of blood pressure in South Asian male immigrants are urgently required. Future initiatives need to consider the sociocultural, religious, ethnic, and educational diversity of this population in the design, development, and implementation of campaigns, interventions, and strategies.

Abbreviations

AED: 

Emirati Dirham

AOR: 

Adjusted Odds Ratio

BMI: 

Body Mass Index

BP: 

Blood Pressure

CI: 

Confidence Interval

DBP: 

Diastolic Blood Pressure

DPSC: 

Disease Prevention and Screening Centre

HbA1c: 

Glycated haemoglobin

IPAQ: 

International Physical Activity Questionnaire

NCD: 

Non-communicable Chronic Diseases

SBP: 

Systolic Blood Pressure

UAE: 

United Arab Emirates

USA: 

United States of America

USD: 

United States Dollar

WHO: 

World Health Organization

WC: 

Waist circumference

WHR: 

Waist-to-Hip Ratio

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank the participants for their great contribution to the study. This study was supported by Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences United Arab Emirates Individual Faculty Grant (No NP09-30) titled “Chronic Diseases Prevention in Immigrants: Putting Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors on Surveillance Screen”. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University
(2)
Ambulatory Health Services. SEHA
(3)
Dubai Health Authority

References

  1. Narayan KMV, Ali MK, Koplan JP. Global health: global non-communicable diseases where worlds meet. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1196–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factors clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2224–60.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Lewington S, Clark R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R. Prospective Studies Collaboration. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet. 2002;360(93490):1903–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WF, Green LA, Izzo Jr JL, et al. The seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289(19):2560–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ostchega Y, Yoon SS, Hughes J, Louis T. Hypertension awareness, treatment and control- continued disparities in adults: United States, 2005–2006. NCHS Data Brief. 2008;3:1–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Reddy KS. Cardiovascular diseases in non-Western countries. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2438–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Joshi P, Islam S, Pais P, Reddy S, Dorairaj P, Kazmi K, et al. Risk factors for early myocardial infarction in South Asian compared with individuals in other countries. JAMA. 2007;297:286–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hodge AM, Dowse GK, Collins VR, Alberti KG, Gareeboo H, Tuomilehto J, et al. Abdominal fat distribution and insulin levels only partially explain adverse cardiovascular risk profile in Asian Indians. J Cardiovasc Risk. 1996;3:263–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Yusuf S, Reddy S, Ounpuu S, Anand S. Global burden of cardiovascular disease, part II: variation in cardiovascular diseases by specific ethnic groups and geographic regions and prevention strategies. Circulation. 2011;104:2855–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. McKeigue PM, Marmot MG. Mortality from coronary heart disease in Asian communities in London. BMJ. 1988;297(6653):903.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. United Arab Emirates Ministry of Economy. Preliminary results of population, housing, and establishment Census 2005, United Arab Emirates 2006. http://www.cscc.unc.edu/uaee/public/UNLICOMMUAE2005CensusResults07282008.pdf. Accessed June 30, 2014.
  12. Al-Maskari F, Shah SM, Al-Sharhan R, Al-Haj E, Al-Kaabi K, Khonji D, et al. Prevalence of depression and suicidal behaviors among male migrant workers in United Arab Emirates. J Immigr Minor Health. 2011;13(6):1027–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ursua RA, Islam NS, Aguilar DE, Wyatt LC, Tendon SD, Abesamis-Mendoza N, et al. Predictors of hypertension among Filipino immigrants in the Northeast US. J Community Health. 2013;38(5):847–55.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Roberson TL, Kato H, Gordon T, Kayan A, Rhoads GG, Land CE, et al. Epidemiologic studies of coronary heart disease and stroke in Japanese men living in Japan.Hawaii and California. Coronary heart disease risk factors in Japan and Haawai. Am J Cardiol. 1977;39(2):244–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Abu Dhabi Health Services Company Statistical Summary Report for Application Summary by Nationalities, Professions and Gender, From January 1 to December 31, 2012. Al Ain, Abu Dhabi: Disease Prevention and Screening Centre, Preventive Medicine Department. Available at https://www.haad.ae/haad/tabid/1516/Default.aspx Accessed May 2015.
  16. World Health Organization. Chronic diseases and health promotion: STEPwise approach to surveillance. Available at http://www.who.int/chp/steps/en/. Accessed May 2015.
  17. International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Guidelines for data processing and analysis of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)-short and long forms. Available at: http://www.institutferran.org/documentos/scoring_short_ipaq_april04.pdf. Accessed August , 2014
  18. 1999 World Health Organization International Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension. Guidelines Subcommittee. J Hypertens. 1999;17:151–83.Google Scholar
  19. Obesity WHO. Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic: Report of a WHO Consultation. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000.Google Scholar
  20. World Health Organization Waist Circumference and Waist-Hip Ratio: Report of a WHO Expert Consultation, Geneva 8–13 December 2008. Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44583/1/9789241501491_eng.pdf. Accessed May, 2015.
  21. Ahmad OB, Boschi-Pinto C, Lopez AD, Murray CJL, Lozano R, et al. Age standardization of rates: a new WHO standard. 2013. Available at: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/paper31.pdf. Accessed May 2015.Google Scholar
  22. Reddy KS, Probhakaran D, Chaturvedi V, Jeemon P, Thankappan KR. Methods for establishing a surveillance system for chronic diseases in Indian Industrial population. Bull World Health Organ. 2006;84(6):461–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Jafar TH, Levey AS, Jafary FH, White F, Gul A. Ethnic subgroup differences in hypertension in Pakistan. J Hypertens. 2003;21:905–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Zaman MM, Rouf MA. Prevalence of hypertension in a Bangladeshi adult population. J Human Hypertension. 1999;13:547–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Shah SM, Hashim J, Chandra S, Loney T, Blair A, AW TC. Awareness, medication use and control of blood pressure in an immigrant population of United Arab Emirates. 1st Arab World Conference on Public Health, April 4 to 6, 2013, Dubai, UAE available at http://www.wfpha.org/tl_files/images/Newsletter/2012. (Page 52), Accessed May 2015.
  26. Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, Muntner P, Whelton PK, et al. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet. 2005;365:217–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Agyemang C, Bhopal RS. Is the blood pressure of South Asian adults in the UK higher or lower than that in European whtite adults? A review of cross-sectional data. J Hum Hypertens. 2002;16(11):739–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpus S, Dans T, Ayesum A, et al. INTERHEART Study Investigators. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case–control study. Lancet. 2004;364:937–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Khan FS, Lotia-Farrukh I, Khan AJ, Siddiqui ST, Sajun SZ, Malik AA, et al. The burden of non-communicable disease in transition communities in an Asian megacity: baseline findings from a cohort study in Karachi, Pakistan. PLoS One. 2013;8(2), e56008. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056008.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Foulds HJ, Bredin SS, Warburton DE. The relationship between hypertension and obesity across different ethnicities. J Hypertens. 2012;30(2):359–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Chaturvedi S, Pant M, Neelum, Yadav G. Hypertension in Delhi: prevalence, awareness, treatment and control. Trop Doct. 2007;37:142–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kumar S, Khan S. Blood pressure awareness among general population: a rural West Bengal experience with logistic regression. Natl Med Res. 2012;2(1):55–8.Google Scholar
  33. Abdulle AM, Nagelkerke NJ, Abouchacra S, Pathan JY, Adem A. Under-treatment and under diagnosis of hypertension: a serious problem in the United Arab Emirates. BMC Cardiovasc Dis. 2006;6:24. doi:10.1186/1471-2261-6-24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Dong GH, Sun ZQ, Zhang XZ, Li JJ, Zheng LQ, Li J, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in rural Liaonning province. Indian J Med Res. 2008;128(2):122–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ahluwalia JS, McNagny SE, Rask KJ. Correlates of controlled hypertension in indigent inner-city hypertensive patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:7–14.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Burke W, Motulsky AG. The genetic basis of common diseases. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992. p. 170–91.Google Scholar
  37. McDonald M, Hertz RP, Unger AN, Lustik MB. Prevalence, awareness, and management of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes among United States adults aged 65 and older. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009;64:256–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Enas EA, Garg A, Davidson MA, Nair VM, Huet BA. Coronary heart disease and its risk factors in first-generation immigrant Asian Indians to the United States of America. Indian Heart J. 1996;48:343–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Mckeigue PM, Miller GJ, Maromot MG. Coronary heart disease in South Asians overseas: a review. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42:597–609.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Harding S. Mortality of migrants from the Indian subcontinent to England and Wales: effect of duration of residence. Epidemiology. 2003;14:287–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Ikeda N, Sapienza D, Guerrero R, Aekplakorn W, Naghavi N, Mokdad AH, et al. Control of hypertension with medication: a comparative analysis of national surveys in 20 countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2014;92(1):10–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Shah et al. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.