Skip to main content

Study rationale and design of a study of EMPAgliflozin’s effects in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and Coronary ARtery disease: the EMPA-CARD randomized controlled trial



Recent trials have revealed that sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2-i) are effective against hyperglycemia and also reduce micro- and macro-vascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Most of the beneficial cardiovascular effects have been investigated in patients with heart failure and coronary artery disease (CAD). Yet, few human studies have been conducted to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying these clinically beneficial effects in patients with CAD. Accordingly, the EMPA-CARD trial was designed to focus on the molecular effects of empagliflozin in patients with T2DM and CAD.


In this multicenter, triple-blind randomized controlled trial, patients with documented known T2DM and CAD will be recruited. They will be randomized on a 1:1 ratio and assigned into two groups of empagliflozin 10 mg/daily and placebo. The primary endpoint is the effect of empagliflozin on changes of plasma interleukin 6 (IL-6) after 26 weeks of treatment. The secondary endpoints will consist of changes in other inflammatory biomarkers (Interleukin 1-beta and high-sensitive C-reactive protein), markers of oxidative stress, platelet function, and glycemic status.


The EMPA-CARD trial mainly tests the hypothesis that SGLT2 inhibition by empagliflozin may improve inflammatory status measured as reduction in inflammatory biomarkers in patients with T2DM and CAD. The results will provide information about the underlying mechanisms of SGLT2 inhibition that mediate the beneficial effects of this medication on clinical outcomes.

Trial registration

Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials., Identifier: IRCT20190412043247N2. Registration Date: 6/13/2020. Registration timing: prospective.

Peer Review reports


Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic disease that is characterized by high blood glucose levels due to the inability to produce adequate amounts of insulin and/or resistance to the hormone’s actions [1]. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a complex metabolic condition and, as the most common type of diabetes, it affects some 37% of the population in western and middle-eastern societies leading to long-term complications [2]. The major complications of this disease fall into two general categories of microvascular and macrovascular involvements, which can consequently lead to cardiovascular, neurological, ophthalmological, and renal damage [3]. Cardiovascular complications are the leading cause of death in the affected population. Atherosclerosis develops more rapidly in these patients and increases the incidence of a heart attack two to three times [4]. The management methods require multi-faceted strategies, including regular physical activity, proper diet, and medications to control hyperglycemia, hypertension, inflammation, and dyslipedemia [5, 6]. Among various medications available to treat diabetes, one of the newest ones is sodium-glucose co-transport 2 inhibitors (SGLT2-i) including empagliflozin, dapagliflozin, and canagliflozin. Empagliflozin is a selective inhibitor of the SGLT2 co-transporter expressed in the proximal tubule of nephrons. Inhibition of SGLT2 reduces hyperglycemia by decreasing glucose reabsorption in the kidneys leading to increased urinary glucose excretion, reductions in blood glucose and HbA1C [7]. The EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial and its sub-studies revealed the additional beneficial effects of this medication versus standard treatment protocols in patients with T2DM and heart failure. These effects include a reduction in Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE), blood pressure, urinary albumin exertion, and improvements in lipid profile and vascular resistance [8, 9]. Some hypotheses have been advanced to explain the beneficial cardiovascular effects of this agent including hemodynamic changes due to decreased plasma volume following glycosuria-induced diuresis, changes in heart fuel consumption, improvements in overall metabolism by a reduction of inflammation, and direct effects on the cardiac tissue; however, the underlying mechanisms remain obscure [10, 11]. Many factors contribute to the physiopathology of cardiovascular complications in patients with T2DM including an increase in pro-inflammatory factors, imbalance in oxidative stress and a hyper-coagulation state with abnormal platelet function [12]. In this regard, animal models and in-vitro studies have been performed to evaluate the effects of empagliflozin on inflammatory state and platelet function. The results showed a reduction in oxidative stress, pro-inflammatory phenotype, and glucotoxicity, but platelet function remained unchanged [13, 14]. To date, few human model randomized trial has been performed to evaluate the inflammation and platelet dysfunction hypothesis in T2DM patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Hence, the main objective of this parallel group, triple-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial is to test the hypothesis that empagliflozin improves the inflammatory state in T2DM patients with documented known CAD.

Methods and experimental design

Study design and Intervention

EMPA-CARD is a multicenter triple-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial designed to evaluate the effect of treatment with empagliflozin (10 mg tablet once daily) versus placebo for 26 weeks, in addition to standard care, in patients with T2DM and coronary artery disease.

Study objectives

The primary objective of the EMPA-CARD trial is to evaluate the effect of empagliflozin on the inflammatory state in patients with T2DM and coronary artery disease after 26 weeks of treatment (Fig. 1). Other objectives which will be investigated as the trial’s sub-studies are shown in Table 1.

Fig. 1

Pathways contributing to the development of micro- and macro-vascular complications in patients with T2DM and insulin resistance (only coronary artery disease, retinopathy and nephropathy are illustrated). Red boxes Indicate where the trial’s primary objective (potential molecular effects of empagliflozin on inflammatory state) will be assessed. The concept was derived from the studies of Bugger et al. and Oguntibeju et al. [15, 16]. IL-6 interleukin 6, IL-1 interleukin 1, ROS reactive oxygen species, CRP C-reactive protein, GBM glomerular basement membrane, LDL low density lipoprotein, WBC white blood cell, PDGF platelet derived growth factor, TGF-β transforming growth factor beta

Table 1 Trial objectives and measurement methods (measured at time = 0 and after 26 weeks of treatment)

Ethics considerations

The EMPA-CARD trial is conducting in accordance with the principles of the declaration of Helsinki and all subsequent revisions. The study was approved by the ethics committee of Zanjan university of Medical Sciences. All patients are provided with written informed consent by the investigators prior to the recruitment. Moreover, the study protocol was prospectively registered on the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (, Identifier: IRCT20190412043247N2).

Trial population and eligibility assessment

Our goal is to randomize 100 participants from registries of 4 clinical centers (i.e., Mousavi hospital (coronary angiography registry), Vali-e-Asr hospital, and two cardiology clinics of Zanjan University of Medical Sciences) in Zanjan, Iran. The pooled population of the clinics is 8000 patients, whose records were extracted from registries at the pre-recruitment phase. Patients aged between 45 and 75 years old with T2DM and known coronary artery disease (established by coronary angiography) who are on background standard anti-ischemic and anti-diabetic therapy with an HbA1C between 6.5 and 9.5% were eligible for inclusion. The type and dose of background anti-diabetic medications should be constant for at least 3 months prior to recruitment. Patients’ left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) must be higher than 40%. Moreover, they must not be receiving anti-oxidant, anticoagulant, or antiplatelet medications or supplements (except for aspirin at 80 mg/d) for at least 3 months prior to recruitment. Detailed information for inclusion and exclusion criteria is provided in Table 2.

Table 2 List of inclusion and exclusion criteria for randomization

Randomization and follow-up

The randomization method employed in this study is stratified randomization. During the screening process, eligible patients are stratified by gender (male and female), age (45–54, 55–64, and 65–75 years old), and HbA1c (6.5–7.9% and 8–9.5%) and assigned into one of the two arms of the study (A or B). The randomization sequence is created using Winpepi software (version 11.6). The allocation sequence was concealed using the sealed envelopes mechanism. All participants will be followed up by phone calls every 4 weeks for assuring the proper medication usage, and for premature discontinuation or development of any adverse events. At the end of weeks 2, 12, and 26, patients are instructed to attend clinic visits for complete checkup and physical examination. Patients are also advised to return all used and unused medications at the end of week 26. The study’s follow-up and procedures are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3 SPIRIT flow diagram


Empagliflozin and placebo tablets with the same color, shape, and package with the different code combination numbers are used for groups A and B. After enrollment, a code is assigned to each patient and will be used until the end of this study. Patients, researchers and healthcare providers who gather information and assess the outcomes and analyze the data of the study are blinded to the assigned treatment (empagliflozin or placebo) such that all patients will be evaluated under the unique assigned code and the treatment groups of A or B. In case of a need for un-blinding, the research council of Zanjan University of Medical Sciences will be notified by the chief investigator to discuss the terms of un-blinding. The un-blinded treatment list is held by the Zanjan University Medical Documentation Council which generated the allocation sequence and is not involved in the study. If the un-blinding is approved by the research council, the Documentation Council will be notified and ultimately the patient will be sent to an external clinical visit for further assessment and follow-up; meanwhile the chief investigator and research council will remain blinded.


To assess the outcomes of the study and sub-studies, patients undergo blood sampling, electrocardiography (ECG), and 2D trans-thoracic echocardiography (Table 3).

Primary outcome

The primary outcome of this study is the changes in plasma interleukin 6 levels after 26 weeks of the treatment between the two study arms.

Secondary outcomes for the primary objective

The secondary outcomes for testing the hypothesis of the study’s primary objective are categorized into 4 divisions including (1) Changes in additional plasma inflammatory biomarker levels (high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and plasma interleukin 1-beta (IL-1b)); (2) Changes in oxidative stress status (lymphocytic reactive oxygen species levels (ROS), plasma levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), carbonyl level, total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC), reduced glutathione level (GSHr), catalase enzyme (CAT) activity, and superoxide dismutase enzyme (SOD) activity); (3) Changes in platelet function (CD62-P expression on the platelet surface); and 4) Changes in glycemic status (Fasting Blood Glucose (FBS), HbA1C, and Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)).

Additional secondary outcomes

The additional secondary outcomes will be considered for the EMPA-CARD sub-studies including (1) Changes in cardiac biomarkers (Serum high-sensitive troponin I (hs-Troponin-I), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels); (2) Changes in Echocardiographic parameters (left ventricular systolic and diastolic function and right ventricular function); (3) Changes in hematopoietic status and renal function (blood hematocrit, hemoglobin, and serum erythropoietin, and urine microalbuminuria levels); (4) Changes in lipid profile (serum total cholesterol, Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglyceride levels); and (5) Changes in electrocardiographic parameters (PR interval duration, QRS complex duration, QT interval duration, ST-segment deviation, and T wave alternans).

All the above secondary outcomes will be assessed as the changes from baseline to week 26 of treatment in each study arm. Measurements of the biomarkers will be performed in the biotechnology laboratory of the Zanjan University of Medical Sciences and the Mousavi Hospital’s laboratory. The detailed information about the mentioned outcomes is presented in Table 4.

Table 4 The detailed descriptions of selected outcomes


For the measurements and analysis of some outcomes, a biobank is established in which the separated plasma/serum and urine samples are allocated in separate micro-tubes and stored in an ultra-low temperature freezer with the patient’s dedicated code. Based on the regulations of the local data protection agency, after the measurements, all the remaining samples will be anonymized and the biobank will be discontinued. All patients are informed in the consent form about the establishment of the biobank.

Study monitoring

Monitoring the study and data source verification is the responsibility of the Research Council of Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Iran which is independent from the study sponsors and any potential competing interests. All the forms used in this study, including the consent form, trial procedure manual, trial violation form, adverse events form, and outcomes’ related checklists, were evaluated and validated by a team of clinical trial monitors and the above Council. Recruitment visits are conducted under direct observation of the team. Human subject de-identification is an issue which is considered as local/regional and national requirements among all presentations and publications. To fulfill that requirement, appropriate measurements such as encoding or deletion are enforced. All of the study investigators are informed to follow the trial procedure manual. Also, any deviation from the protocol by any investigator will be recorded into the trial violation form designed by the Ethics Committee of the Zanjan University of Medical Sciences. All of the study forms are in the Persian language.

Adverse event recording

Any adverse events, related or unrelated, whether reported by the patient or discovered by the investigators during the study follow-up (until week 28) will be recorded in the adverse events form. At the same time, the Research Council of the Zanjan University of Medical Sciences will be notified at the time of the recording. The severity and the importance of the adverse events for further decisions (e.g. discontinuation, unblinding, etc.) will be evaluated by a physician. In case of occurrence of any adverse event, patient/s will be completely followed up by the assigned physician/s and the treatment charges will be fully covered by the trial team. The standard adverse event form is presented in the Additional file 1.

Potential confounding factors

According to the nature of the variables in primary and secondary outcomes, two potential major study confounding factors were predicted: (1) patients’ nutritional status and (2) patients’ physical activity status. To evaluate the impact of these possible confounding factors, the food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and the physical activity questionnaire (FAQ) are used. The forms are filled at the day of recruitment. Also, patients are advised not to change their routine diet or physical activity during the study.

Statistical considerations

Sample size calculations

The sample size was estimated based on the changes in plasma IL-6 level as a primary outcome of treatment. According to a previous study, the SGLT2-i dapagliflozin reduced the mean plasma IL-6 level from 6.6 to 5.8 (pg/mL) with the standard deviation (SD) of 8.9 [17]. The minimal important difference (MID) of the IL-6 level was calculated 4.45 (pg/mL) using 0.5 × SD (the distributional-based method) [18]. With a study power of 80%, an alpha level of 0.05%, and MID of 4.45, the required sample size was calculated to be 41 patients in each arm. Considering a 20% dropout during the study, the sample size was rounded up to 50 participants in each arm. The sample size was calculated using the G-power software (version

Statistical analysis plan

We will use the means ± standard deviations (SD) and frequencies and percentages n (%) to interpret the results. The noninferiority margin and 95% confidence interval (CI) will be estimated for primary outcomes. The noninferiority will be accepted if the upper 95% CI for the relative risk (RR) lies below the margin of noninferiority. An intention-to-treat analysis will be used to examine the effect of missing data. Superiority analysis will be performed at α = 0.05 level. The interaction effects will be examined using graphical and statistical tests. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test will be used to determine the normality of the distribution of continuous quantitative data. Independent T-test will be used (on condition of normal distribution) for statistical analysis of quantitatively continuous variables findings related to primary and secondary outcome including interleukin 6 levels, oxidative stress biomarkers, platelet function, glycemic status, cardiac biomarkers, echocardiographic finding, hematopoietic and renal biomarker, lipid profile and electrocardiographic parameters. The Mann–Whitney U test will be used on the condition of abnormal distribution. Chi-square test will be used to analyze qualitative data such as ST segment deviation and T-wave changes in electrocardiogram. We will consider the probability of 0.05 for the main analysis. We will perform Bayesian analysis of the covariance test to examine the effects of intervention on IL-6. The primary outcome is considered as confirmatory and the secondary outcomes are considered as exploratory. All statistical tests will be carried out in the in Rv.4 environment. The primary data of the FFQ will be evaluated by using the Nutritionist software version 4 (N4).

Current status

At present, the mentioned sites are actively recruiting patients. The pre-recruitment phase (evaluation and extraction of 8000 patients’ medical records from hospitals and clinics registries) was started on November 11, 2019. The patients’ recruitment phase (the first patient who was consented and randomized) was started on June 29, 2020 and until November 9, 2020, 91 patients were randomized. The end date of expected recruitment may be extended due to the COVID-19 pandemic but it is expected that the recruitment phase will ends by the end of January 2021.


The EMPA-CARD randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial seeks to investigate the mechanisms underlying the cardiovascular effects of empagliflozin in patients with T2DM who have proven CAD at the same time.

Most of the recent published clinical trials have focused on the effects of empagliflozin in patients with heart failure in which the superiority of empagliflozin has been reported. The recent meta-analysis with the pooled population of 8474 patients (DAPA-HF and EMPEROR-Reduced population) showed that treatment with an SGLT2-i was associated with a significant reduction in cardiovascular death (pooled hazard ratio of 0.86) and re-hospitalization due to heart failure complications as well as improvements in renal function [19]. However, limited data are available regarding the beneficial effects of empagliflozin in patients with established CAD. The EMPA-HEART Cardiolink-6 trial showed that 6 months of treatment with empagliflozin significantly reduced left ventricular mass index (LVMi) in patients with T2DM and CAD [20]. In this study we are exploring molecular mechanisms and cellular changes that potentially mediate these beneficial effects. Plasma levels of IL-6, a pro-inflammatory cytokine which also has anti-inflammatory properties promotes and regulates inflammatory processes in patients with T2DM, and changes in its level is considered as the primary outcome of this study. The rationale of choosing this biomarker as a leading factor for investigation among other candidates is that IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) appear to have the highest impact on the promotion of CAD in patients with diabetes mellitus [21]. Moreover, the other factors measured in this study are either directly or indirectly affected by IL-6. It has been shown that IL-6 reduces oxidative stress and apoptosis of pancreatic β-cell by promoting autophagy, an adaptive response to cellular stress. Previous human studies have shown that concomitant treatment with empagliflozin and metformin in patients with type 1 diabetes reduced IL-6 up to 1.34 fold and improved anti-oxidative status parameters comprising of total anti-oxidative status (TAS) for up to 1.07 fold and superoxide dismutase (SOD) for up to 1.08 fold. It has also been suggested that the cardio-protective effects of this drug class may be associated with its anti-oxidative effects, including normalizing interferon-γ (IFN-γ), TNF-α and IL-6 levels especially with empagliflozin [22, 23]. In animal studies, diabetic rats which were treated by SGLT2 inhibitor had a lower development of endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, advanced glycation end products/ receptor for advanced glycation end products (AGE/RAGE) signaling and inflammation due to inhibition of the activity of NADPH oxidase and decreased serum levels of the AGE precursor methylglyoxal [24]. In a study by Tahara et al. diabetic rats which were treated by ipragliflozin had significantly lower plasma levels of IL-6, TNF-α, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and CRP [25]. Nevertheless, it seems that the inflammation and fatty acid oxidation, which are also promoted by IL-6, have greater impact on increasing the oxidative stress in patients with T2DM. This could enhance the rate and magnitude of coronary atherosclerosis and subsequent CAD [26, 27].


As EMPA-REG OUTCOME has shown beneficial effects of Empagliflozin in people with established atherosclerosis including CAD, the EMPA-CARD trial is designed to provide a better understanding of the effects of this medication on inflammation (as one of the most important mechanisms of atherosclerosis) in these patients.

Availability of data and materials

The data/information supporting this study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.



Interleukin 6


Interleukin 1


Interleukin 1-beta


C-reactive protein


High sensitive C-reactive protein


Glomerular basement membrane


White blood cell


Platelet derived growth factor


Transforming growth factor beta


Type 2 diabetes mellitus

HbA1c :

Glycated hemoglobin A1c


Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance

hs-Troponin I:

High sensitive troponin I


Brain natriuretic peptide


N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide



LDL cholesterol:

Low density lipoprotein cholesterol

HDL cholesterol:

High density lipoprotein cholesterol


Body mass index


Estimated glomerular filtration rate


New York Heart Association


Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor


Coronary artery bypass graft


Acute coronary syndrome


Transient ischemic attack


Cerebrovascular accident


Percutaneous coronary intervention








Diabetic ketoacidosis






Alkaline phosphatase




Blood urea nitrogen






Prothrombin time


Partial thromboplastin time


Complete blood count


Urine analysis


Urine culture


Reactive oxygen species




Total antioxidant capacity


Reduced glutathione




Superoxide dismutase


Dichlorofluorescin diacetate


Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching


Mean Fluorescent Index


Advanced glycation end products


Receptor for advanced glycation end products


Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1


Thrombin Receptor Activator Peptide-6


  1. 1.

    Jay D, Hitomi H, Griendling KK. Oxidative stress and diabetic cardiovascular complications. Free Radic Biol Med. 2006;40(2):183–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Kharroubi AT, Darwish HM. Diabetes mellitus: the epidemic of the century. World J Diabetes. 2015;6(6):850–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gourgari E, Wilhelm EE, Hassanzadeh H, Aroda VR, Shoulson I. A comprehensive review of the FDA-approved labels of diabetes drugs: Indications, safety, and emerging cardiovascular safety data. J Diabetes Complicat. 2017;31(12):1719–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Low Wang CC, Hess CN, Hiatt WR, Goldfine AB. Clinical update: cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus: atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and heart failure in type 2 diabetes mellitus–mechanisms, management, and clinical considerations. Circulation. 2016;133(24):2459–502.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ley SH, Hamdy O, Mohan V, Hu FB. Prevention and management of type 2 diabetes: dietary components and nutritional strategies. Lancet. 2014;383(9933):1999–2007.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bailey C, Kodack M. Patient adherence to medication requirements for therapy of type 2 diabetes. Int J Clin Pract. 2011;65(3):314–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Hansen HH, Jelsing J, Hansen CF, Hansen G, Vrang N, Mark M, et al. The sodium glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitor empagliflozin preserves β-cell mass and restores glucose homeostasis in the male zucker diabetic fatty rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2014;350(3):657–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, Fitchett D, Bluhmki E, Hantel S, et al. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2117–28.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Cherney DZ, Zinman B, Inzucchi SE, Koitka-Weber A, Mattheus M, von Eynatten M, et al. Effects of empagliflozin on the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio in patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease: an exploratory analysis from the EMPA-REG OUTCOME randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(8):610–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Sattar N, McLaren J, Kristensen SL, Preiss D, McMurray JJ. SGLT2 Inhibition and cardiovascular events: why did EMPA-REG Outcomes surprise and what were the likely mechanisms? Diabetologia. 2016;59(7):1333–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Perrone-Filardi P, Avogaro A, Bonora E, Colivicchi F, Fioretto P, Maggioni AP, et al. Mechanisms linking empagliflozin to cardiovascular and renal protection. Int J Cardiol. 2017;241:450–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Rodriguez-Araujo G, Nakagami H. Pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus. Cardiovasc Endocrinol Metab. 2018;7(1):4–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Oelze M, Kröller-Schön S, Welschof P, Jansen T, Hausding M, Mikhed Y, et al. The sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor empagliflozin improves diabetes-induced vascular dysfunction in the streptozotocin diabetes rat model by interfering with oxidative stress and glucotoxicity. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e112394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Santos-Gallego CG, Zafar M, San Antonio R, Ibanez JAR, Botija MBP, Ishikawa K, et al. The SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin does not exhibit pro thrombotic effects. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(11 Supplement):A1852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Bugger H, Abel ED. Molecular mechanisms of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Diabetologia. 2014;57(4):660–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Yuan T, Yang T, Chen H, Fu D, Hu Y, Wang J, et al. New insights into oxidative stress and inflammation during diabetes mellitus-accelerated atherosclerosis. Redox Biol. 2019;20:247–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Latva-Rasku A, Honka M-J, Kullberg J, Mononen N, Lehtimäki T, Saltevo J, et al. The SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin reduces liver fat but does not affect tissue insulin sensitivity: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with 8-week treatment in type 2 diabetes patients. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(5):931–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    King MT. A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods. Expert Rev Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res. 2011;11(2):171–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Zannad F, Ferreira JP, Pocock SJ, Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, et al. SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a meta-analysis of the EMPEROR-Reduced and DAPA-HF trials. Lancet. 2020;396(10254):819–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Verma S, Mazer CD, Yan AT, Mason T, Garg V, Teoh H, et al. Effect of empagliflozin on left ventricular mass in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease: the EMPA-HEART CardioLink-6 randomized clinical trial. Circulation. 2019;140(21):1693–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Gupta S, Maratha A, Siednienko J, Natarajan A, Gajanayake T, Hoashi S, et al. Analysis of inflammatory cytokine and TLR expression levels in type 2 diabetes with complications. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Tan SA, Tan L. Empagliflozin and canagliflozin attenuate inflammatory cytokines interferon-Λ, tumor necrosis factor-Α, interleukin-6: possible mechanism of decreasing cardiovascular risk in diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(11S):A1830-A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Janic M, Lunder M, Sabovic M, Janez A. Antioxidative effects of empagliflozin and metformin in type 1 diabetes mellitus patients. Am Diabetes Assoc. 2020;69(S1):1148-P.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kusaka H, Koibuchi N, Hasegawa Y, Ogawa H, Kim-Mitsuyama S. Empagliflozin lessened cardiac injury and reduced visceral adipocyte hypertrophy in prediabetic rats with metabolic syndrome. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016;15(1):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Tahara A, Kurosaki E, Yokono M, Yamajuku D, Kihara R, Hayashizaki Y, et al. Effects of SGLT2 selective inhibitor ipragliflozin on hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, hepatic steatosis, oxidative stress, inflammation, and obesity in type 2 diabetic mice. Eur J Pharmacol. 2013;715(1–3):246–55.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Marasco MR, Conteh AM, Reissaus CA, Cupit JE, Appleman EM, Mirmira RG, et al. Interleukin-6 reduces β-cell oxidative stress by linking autophagy with the antioxidant response. Diabetes. 2018;67(8):1576–88.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Qu D, Liu J, Lau CW, Huang Y. IL-6 in diabetes and cardiovascular complications. Br J Pharmacol. 2014;171(15):3595–603.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to express our thanks to Dr. Hossein Chiti, Dr. Ahmad Jalilvand, Mr. Ehsan Janzamin, Ms. Zeinab Darvishian, Dr. Atieh Asgari, and Dr. Homa Taheri for their fruitful consultations and for providing us with resources. We thank Dr. Abidi Pharmaceutical Company® for providing us with the medication and placebo and for sponsoring the study. Last but not least, we thank all the patients and collaborators for their patience and cooperation through the study.

Role of Dr. Adibi Pharmaceutical Company

The company supplied the medication and placebo for the study. The company had no role in the development of the protocol, process of the study, or preparation of this manuscript.


The EMPA-CARD study is funded by Dr. Abidi Pharmaceutical Company® and Zanjan University of Medical Sciences (Grant Number: 1602001000).

Author information




All authors participated in this study have read and approved the content of the manuscript. SEP G: Concepts, Design and study’s main idea, Literature search, Chief investigator and outcome assessor, Manuscript preparation, patients follow up; TR: Design, outcome assessor, literature search, patients follow up, manuscript preparation; HK: Design, literature search, Revision, Concepts; MF: Design, Concepts, Revision; HA: Design, Concepts, Revision, Study coordination, Definition of intellectual content; SAJ: Design, Statistical analysis; FIB: Design, Revision; SAM G: Outcome assessor and patient follow up; MD: Outcome assessor and patient follow up; MJM: Outcome assessor and patient follow up; SH G: statistical analysis, Manuscript editing; SAE G: Design. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hassan Ahangar.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The EMPA-CARD trial is conducting in accordance with the principles of the declaration of Helsinki and all subsequent revisions. The study was approved by the ethics committee of Zanjan university of Medical Sciences. All patients provided with written informed consent prior to the recruitment. Moreover, the study protocol was prospectively registered on the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (, Identifier: IRCT20190412043247N2).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors contributing to the study have nothing relevant to disclose. Only the study authors are responsible for conducting and reporting the final contents of the trial. This study has received a non-financial funding from the Dr. Abidi Pharmaceutical Company.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gohari, S., Reshadmanesh, T., Khodabandehloo, H. et al. Study rationale and design of a study of EMPAgliflozin’s effects in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and Coronary ARtery disease: the EMPA-CARD randomized controlled trial. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 21, 318 (2021).

Download citation


  • SGLT2 inhibitor
  • Empagliflozin
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Coronary artery disease
  • Inflammation
  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus