Insight into the epidemiology of infective endocarditis in Portugal: a contemporary nationwide study from 2010 to 2018
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders volume 21, Article number: 138 (2021)
Nationwide hospital admissions data series have contributed to a reliable assessment of the changing epidemiology of infective endocarditis, even though conclusions are not uniform. We sought to use a recent populational series to describe the temporal trends on the incidence of infective endocarditis, its clinical characteristics and outcome results, in Portugal.
A nationwide retrospective temporal trend study on the incidence and clinical characterization of patients hospitalized with infective endocarditis, between 2010 and 2018.
7574 patients were hospitalized with infective endocarditis from 2010 to 2018 in Portuguese public hospitals. The average length of hospitalization was 29.3 ± 28.7 days, predominantly men (56.9%), and 47.1% had between 60 and 79 years old. The most frequent infectious agents involved were Staphylococcus (16.4%) and Streptococcus (13.6%). During hospitalization, 12.4% of patients underwent heart valve surgery and 20% of the total cohort died. After a 1-year post-discharge follow-up, 13.2% of the total initial cohort had had heart valve surgery and 21.2% in total died. The annual incidence of infective endocarditis was 8.31 per 100,000 habitants, being higher in men (9.96 per 100,000 in males versus 6.82 in females, p < 0.001) and increased with age, peaking at patients 80 years old or older (40.62 per 100,000). In-hospital mortality rate significantly increased during the analyzed period, the strongest independent predictors being ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, sepsis, and acute renal failure. Younger age and cardiac surgery had a protective effect towards a fatal outcome.
In Portugal, between 2010 and 2018, the incidence of infective endocarditis presented a general growth trend with a deceleration in the most recent years. Also, a significant rate of in-hospital complications, a mildly lower than expected stable surgical rate and a still high and growing mortality rate were noted.
Infective endocarditis (IE) is an old and rare disease, with an annual incidence in populational studies of 4 to 10 cases per 100,000 per habitants . Indeed, all IE cases culminate in hospitalization at some point. And despite decades of improvement in the medical and surgical field, a persistent substantial rate of complications and mortality is shown in IE. In fact, worldwide, the intrahospital mortality rate varies among different countries, varying between 8 and 40% . Several factors may contribute to this variation such as the country surveyed, the duration of the research, the analyzed time, variations in the population studied, considered IE case definition and organization of the health systems.
A shift in the epidemiology of endocarditis has been noted in the most recent literature [3,4,5], with older and more complex patients, Staphylococcus aureus as an important and emerging agent, a growing susceptible adult population of patients with congenital heart disease or intracardiac prosthesis or devices and chronic renal failure on dialysis. The diagnostic criteria changed in 2000  with the evolution of transesophageal echocardiography and microbiology and in 2015  with the inclusion of new imaging diagnostic techniques such as 18F-FDG PET/CT. Timing of surgery and antibiotic prophylaxis continue to be challenging issues in daily practice.
Little information is known about Portugal’s temporal trends regarding IE incidence and clinical results. The main source of evidence regarding the IE situation in Portugal arises from single-center hospital surveys [8,9,10,11,12] and conclude that it predominantly occurs in older male patients, with a predominance of Staphylococcus and Streptococcus species and an apparently high rate of intrahospital complications. Nevertheless, several questions remain unanswered regarding epidemiological and outcome results in patients hospitalized with IE in Portugal.
Using populational-based data we aimed to understand the incidence of IE in Portugal, describe its clinical, microbiological, complications and outcome results, and analyze its evolution between 2010 and 2018.
Study design and data source
A nationwide retrospective temporal trend study on the incidence of IE was performed.
Data were obtained from the Central Administration of the Health System of the Portuguese Ministry of Health (Administração Central Sistemas Saúde—ACSS-). This system contains administrative and clinical data of all admissions and discharges to National Health System hospitals, which covers almost the whole population of Portugal. Until 2014, it only included Portugal Mainland public hospitals. From 2015 onwards, it included the Madeira and Azores public hospital data. Hospitalizations in private hospital centers are not included.
The hospital discharge report contains clinical information (sex, age, geographical region, hospital institution, date of admission and discharge, length of hospitalization, disposition—home, unknown, another acute hospital center, palliative care institution, outpatient clinics, discharge against medical advice, deceased), a clinical diagnosis list (a primary diagnosis and up to nineteen secondary diagnoses) and procedures (up to twenty). It is completed by the medical team that was responsible for the patient during hospitalization. Hospital discharge report coding, using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) is then performed by specially trained medical staff, based on the medical report and other clinical documents available on the patient’s file.
Until 2016, the 9th Revision Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) was used to code for diagnosis and procedures. From 2016 to the present day, the 10th Revision Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) has been used.
Study population and patients
The study population covered patients from all age groups, from Mainland Portugal until 2014 and from Portugal (mainland and islands Azores and Madeira) from 2015 to 2018.
In this study, we retrospectively identified all cases of incident IE episodes analyzing all hospital episodes of patients with a discharge diagnosis of infective endocarditis (ICD-9-CM codes 421.0, 421.1, 421.9 and 424.9; ICD-10-CM I33.0, I33.9, I38 and I39) between 1st January 2010 and 31st December 2018. Patients admitted in 2009 with a diagnosis of IE were removed (prevalent cases). Day case episodes were also excluded.
IE cases were recognized through the identification of all episodes of hospitalization that contained an IE compatible code as the primary or secondary diagnosis. The use of modified Duke criteria  has been the mainstay for the diagnosis of IE in Portugal, with a gradual integration of the newer imaging modalities since 2015 as per European scientific guidelines indication .To avoid overcounting, we identified the first episode of each patient with an IE compatible code for the analyzed period. From this group of patients, we identified those that were transferred to another acute care hospital (a 7.9% of the total cohort, with zero- or one-day difference between the discharge date and the subsequent admission for IE), guaranteeing combination between subsequent episode to the previous one so that all patients were considered to have a single episode/hospitalization for IE.
All subsequent hospital episodes following one year after the first hospitalization for IE were analyzed to identify hospital readmissions and the performance of cardiac surgery.
For incident IE episodes, clinical information (sex, age, year of discharge length of hospitalization), previous heart history and comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, non-rheumatic valve disease, rheumatic valve disease, arterial hypertension, chronic renal disease, chronic coronary artery disease, cancer, HIV, cardiac devices and heart valve prosthesis, atrial fibrillation, chronic liver disease, chronic obstructive lung disease, use of opioid drugs, congenital heart disease), microorganisms (Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Gram-negative, anaerobes, fungus, Brucella), IE compatible complications (heart failure, embolic stroke, ischemic stroke, transient ischemic accident, septic shock, splenic abscess, acute renal failure, acute coronary syndrome, central nervous system abscess or meningitis), cardiac surgery, and intrahospital death were collected using the ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes—see Additional file 1: Table S1.
For each year, the incidence of IE in Portugal was estimated as the number of new cases per year and was expressed as 100,000 inhabitants/year and was calculated as a nine-year average. Annual mainland Portuguese population until 2014 and total Portuguese population after 2014 (denominator) were obtained from census population (2011) or estimates for intercensal years, at Statistics Portugal [the Portuguese National Instituto of Statistics (INE)] database.
The annual incidence was also assessed for the age group (< 18; 18–39; 40–49; 50–59; 60–79 and ≥ 80 years old) and sex-specific groups.
The size of the population (total, sex and group age-specific) of Portugal was obtained from the information line of the National Institute of Statistics (Instituto Nacional Estatística—INE—www.ine.pt) and corresponds to the estimates of the resident population at the end of the year, for each year of the study. The Portuguese population was 10,562,178 in 2011 (National Census performed in 2011) decreasing to 10,276,617 in 2018 .
Among patients hospitalized with incident IE, the annual rate of in-hospital mortality was found.
From the analysis of subsequent hospital readmissions for up to one year, the rates of total cardiac surgery performed on the cohort, 30 day and 1-year hospital readmission rates and hospital death within one year of initial admission were also obtained.
Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation and categorical variables expressed as frequencies and percentages. The comparison between continuous variables was done through t Student’s test or Mann Whitney test, and the comparison between categorical variables was calculated with the chi-square test or Fisher exact test. Linear by Linear association was performed to test for a linear trend during the analyzed period.
To assess the factors associated with in-hospital surgical intervention and in-hospital mortality, the inferential analysis was performed using multiple logistic regression (a generalized linear model using Poisson distribution and the logit link function). The Stepwise (Forward) method based on the Akaike information criterion minimization was used for the selection of variables included in the model. The adjusted odds ratio, as well as the 95% Confidence interval (CI 95%), were estimated for each variable included in the regression model.
The temporal trend analysis of IE incidence (total, by age-group, and by gender) was performed using Linear Correlation Coefficient, linear and quadratic regression, using the year variable and its square.
All tests were 2-tailed. The level of significance was set to α = 0.05.
The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows version 24 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
Study population demographic, medical background and in-hospital outcomes
7574 patients were admitted with incident IE from 2010 to 2018 in Portugal, with 8172 episodes of hospitalization—see Table 1. The average length of hospitalization was 29.3 ± 28.7 days (minimum 1 and maximum 439 days, median 21 days). The majority were male (56.9%), and nearly half of the cohort had between 60 and 79 years old. A relevant prevalence of diabetes (26.6%), arterial hypertension (37.3%), atrial fibrillation (24.8%) and heart valve disease (30.4%) were noted.
A microorganism was coded in 49.5% of the incident episodes of IE. The most frequent infectious agents involved were Staphylococcus (16.4%) and Streptococcus (13.6%), followed by gram-negative bacteria (11.9%).
During the first hospitalization for IE, 3995 patients (52.7%) had an in-hospital complication. The most frequent IE related complication were heart failure (29.5%), followed by sepsis (12.4%), neurologic events (ischemic stroke affected nearly 10% of the total cohort) and acute renal failure (10.8%)—see Table 2.
During the incident hospitalization for IE, 937 (12.4%) patients received heart valve surgery.
Of the patients with incident IE, 5058 (66.8%) were discharged home, 64 (1%) were transferred to a rehabilitation or palliative care institution and in 939 patients (12.4%) the destination post discharge is unidentified (unknown or discharge against medical advice). One-fifth of the total cohort (1513 patients) died.
During the studied period, a reduction was noted in the rate of younger patients admitted with IE (particularly between 18 and 39 years old); as the opposite, an increase was noted in the older patients (octogenarians). Also, a trend towards an increase in comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, atrial fibrillation, chronic renal failure and cancer was noted—see Table 3. Likewise, the proportion of IE related to cardiac valve prosthesis and intracardiac devices rose. IE caused by Staphylococcus spp. steadily increased overtime whereas Streptococcus spp. presented a mild overall decline. Regarding IE-related complications, there was overall increment overtime, mainly noted with systemic embolism and acute renal failure rates. The in-hospital surgical rate remained stable during the observed period, oscillating between 10.2 and 14.6%—see Fig. 1.
599 patients were readmitted during the first-year post-discharge after an incident episode of IE (9.8% of the total cohort that survived the first hospitalization)—see Table 2. More than half of these patients were readmitted during the first 30 days post-discharge. During the first year follow up 61 more patients had heart valve surgery totalizing 13.2% of the total cohort and 98 patients died (totalizing 21.2% of the total initial cohort).
Incidence rate and temporal trend of IE in Portugal
In Portugal, from 2010 to 2018, the incidence of IE varied between 6.25 cases and 9.35 per 100,000—see Table 4. The average annual incidence was 8.31 per 100,000 inhabitants (95% CI 7.59–9.03).
IE was more frequent in males [9.96 per 100,000 (95% CI 9.14–10.78) versus 6.82 (95% 6.15–7.51) in females, p < 0.001], with an annual ratio male/female varying between 1.3 and 1.6—see Table 4 and Fig. 2.
Using Pearson’s linear correlation coefficient and linear and quadratic regression analysis on the global incidence of IE in Portugal during the nine years, a globally upper trend was noted with a maximum value occurring in 2015 (9.35 per 100,000 inhabitants)—a deceleration was noted afterward.
The same trend was observed regarding sex-specific incidence in males and females and older patients (≥ 40 years old). Regarding younger patients, a declining tendency is noted quite early (from 2011 onwards)—see Fig. 3b.
Prediction factors related to hospital mortality in IE
Logistic regression analysis for in-hospital mortality is summarized in Table 5. All 27 variables stated in the first column were available for analysis for all individuals. Independent prognosticators of in-hospital mortality were the presence of previous cardiac valve disease, cancer, chronic renal or hepatic disease, HIV, Staphylococcus or Gram-negative infection, acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, older age (specifically after 80 years old), ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, sepsis and acute renal failure, the last were the strongest predictors. Younger age (particularly less than 40 years old) was a protective factor regarding fatal outcome. Cardiac surgery also had a protective effect on in-hospital mortality—see Table 5—odds ratio = 0.69 (95% CI 0.55–0.86, p = 0.001).
Our study identified 7574 patients with incident IE hospitalized between 2010 and 2018, in Portugal. Four main extrapolations were obtained from this analysis. First, the annual crude populational incidence of IE in Portugal averaged 8.3 cases per 100,000 habitants (95% CI 7.59–9.03), with a general growing trend. Second, Staphylococcus was the most prevalent infectious agent in this study. Third, the surgical intervention rate was slightly lower than expected but its protective effect towards prognosis was demonstrated. Finally, this recent analysis confirms that despite all efforts to improve its prognosis, a still too high mortality was noted, with a rising trend.
Incidence estimation can only be performed using populational based data. With regards to IE, populational surveys are scarce and with significant variations regarding methodology and results. The reported incidence of IE among different studies is not entirely similar ranging between 3 and 15 cases per 100,000 in population-based studies [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27], with considerable differences noted even in similar countries . Still, the findings in Portugal are consistent with the already described values. Additionally, an upper trend in incident IE was noted between 2010 and 2018. The strength of this observation is probably restricted by the fact that we are analyzing a short period. Nevertheless, this has been observed in several developed countries such as Denmark, Italy, England, Spain, Germany, or the Netherlands in the past two decades. This tendency was not noted, however, in other countries such as France, Australia, Scotland or the United States of America (USA) [16, 20]. Reasons to explain this global upper trend in IE incidence in Portugal are various, although some may be speculative as this study does not allow for a cause-effect analysis. Portugal has experienced a gradual increase in life expectancy of the population , population aging  with a sustained increase in the aging index of the population . This, adding to a growing proportion of patients with comorbidities associated with an increased rate of invasive medical procedures (cardiac and non-cardiac) can partially explain the observed tendency. Of course, the improvement in microbiology, imaging techniques and medical expertise (clinician’s awareness and technical specialization) that are available in the public health system to diagnose IE can also contribute to the observed trend in developed countries.
Regarding microbiology, the data retrieved from discharge notes were scarce (49.5% of the total cohort), probably a result of underreporting—this has been noted in other populational studies such as in Fedeli et al.  or Shah et al. . Infectious agents such as Staphylococcus spp. and Streptococcus spp. were the most prevalent in this analysis, with a mild predominance of the former, which is according to other tertiary hospitals series [18, 29, 32]. In fact, in developed countries Staphylococcus has replaced Streptococcus as the most prevalent infectious agent causing IE in the last decades, mainly justified by an increase in invasive medical procedures in the general population as well as a significant population of IV drug use. Our data does not allow for analysis regarding the source of IE (community versus healthcare-associated). On the other hand, the low percentage of patients with opioid consumption or HIV in our cohort is probably related to underreporting or underdiagnosis at the time of hospitalization. Unpredictably, gram-negative bacteria were the third most frequent cause of IE in our study (11.9%), followed by Enterococcus.
The increasing role of cardiac surgery in IE management is well documented in all scientific guidelines [7, 33]. The surgical rate in other populational studies ranged from 15 to nearly 50%; yet, the most recent populational series that included patients hospitalized after 2010 reported heterogeneous surgical rates of 10.6–13.3% (Toyoda et al. , USA), 3.8–6.3% (Shah et al. , Scotland), 23% (Olmos et al. , Spain) and 46.5% (Cresti et al. , Italy). Our analysis presented marginally lower values of surgical rate (up to 13.2% at one-year follow-up had had valve surgery), which may be a consequence of an older cohort, with significant comorbidities and a high rate of noncardiac complications as has been described individually in Portuguese single-center surveys . Also, a part of the total cohort may have had surgery after discharge from the incident hospitalization and the IE code may have been underreported in the surgical hospitalization report with loss of that data during this evaluation. An important aspect of our analysis was the demonstration of a clear clinical benefit of surgery which was also noted in the ICE registry , in a metanalysis by Head et al.  and in other tertiary referral centers surveys [10, 11, 35, 36]. Still, a general described temporal trend is on stability [18, 20, 32, 37], which is consistent with our data, despite more recent series reporting an increasing tendency in Spain  and the USA .
One-fifth of the cohort died during the index hospitalization. This is in accordance with other already mentioned populational series. Trend analysis revealed an upper tendency consistent with Italian scenario [18, 25] whereas in Denmark , Spain  and the USA  a decrease was registered. Half the cohort presented related complications, being heart failure the most prevalent situation. An increase in the rate of prognostic factors such as older age, comorbidities (cancer or renal chronic disease), infection by Staphylococcus and the presence of IE related in-hospital complications may justify a higher complexity in IE cases that could thus partially explain this higher mortality during the observed period. This once again confirms the malignant nature of this disease—in fact, the multisystemic nature of the presented complications (cardiac, infectious, neurological, renal) is an argument in favor of having a multidisciplinary team of specialists managing this disease in dedicated centers to improve its prognosis at an individual level.
Finally, nearly 10% of the surviving cohort after the first hospitalization with IE were readmitted during the first year. Few studies have analyzed this specific feature. Morita et al.  concluded that nearly 25% of their cohort were readmitted during the first 30 days post-discharge. The fact that most of our patients were discharged home or to rehabilitation or palliative care institutions and that the length of hospital stay was considerably higher in our study (median 21 days in our study versus 10 days at Morita et al. study) may have contributed to this disparity.
The general growing incidence of IE in a contemporary cohort in Portugal, the need for prolonged hospitalization, with a significant rate of complications and mortality highlight that IE should be a clinical and national priority.
Our study has several limitations.
First, our data were obtained from ICD coded information obtained from discharge reports. Regarding the medical information included in the discharge report, its accuracy could not be verified at an individual patient level and therefore incomplete or erroneous information could have been included, which could have contributed to an overestimation of the IE cases. Regarding the ICD coding that was transferred for an administrative dataset, in Portugal, this process is performed by specifically trained physicians and submitted for an external audition for quality assurance. Still, coding errors or misclassifications may have occurred.
Second, as the study was retrospective and based on administrative data, identification of specific clinical and surgical factors or confounders (origin of IE: community versus health care, frailty index, antibiotic coverage, formal clinical indication for surgery, etc.) that could have a role in explaining some of the shifts observed regarding incidence, surgical rate or in-hospital mortality was limited. Also, the underreporting of relevant concomitant diagnoses could have taken place.
Third, the population of Madeira and Azores islands was not included in this analysis between 2010 and 2014 and the information regarding private hospitals was not included in this analysis which may have underestimated the number of real IE cases.
Fourth, we assumed that the infectious agents identified through the ICD coding were the causative agents of IE but this information was not validated individually. Also, half the patients did not have information on the infectious agent either because it was a negative blood culture IE or because it was underreported, and this was unfeasible to ascertain.
Finally, a selection bias for surgical intervention could have been present as high-risk patients with an indication for surgery but refused or that died before surgery were not identified.
Between 2010 and 2018 in Portugal, the incidence of infective endocarditis demonstrated a global increase with a deceleration in more recent years, a significant rate of in-hospital complications, a mildly lower than expected stable surgical rate and a still too high and growing mortality rate.
The need to analyze and eventually improve existing advanced clinical protocols, hospital circuits for these patients, and the specialization of local multidisciplinary clinical teams is warranted. Additionally, optimization of national healthcare organization through the definition of specific national referral centers should be sought. Lastly, a better understanding of epidemiology is crucial in justifying and promoting favorable national health policies. This can be achieved through the implementation of a national registry that can prospectively describe IE´s diagnosis and management, the promotion of patients and physicians´ education/awareness programs, and the active intervention on risk factors that are amenable to be altered.
Availability of data and materials
The data that support the findings of this study are available from ACSS but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and only after ACSS’s permission.
Coronary Artery Disease
Central nervous system
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Human immunodeficiency virus
Iung B. Infective endocarditis. Epidemiology, pathophysiology and histopathology. Presse Medicale. 2019;48:513–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2019.04.009.
Slipczuk L, Codolosa JN, Davila CD, Romero-Corral A, Yun J, Pressman GS, et al. Infective endocarditis epidemiology over five decades: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(12):1–17.
Habib G, Erba PA, Iung B, Donal E, Cosyns B, Laroche C, et al. Clinical presentation, aetiology and outcome of infective endocarditis. Results of the ESC-EORP EURO-ENDO (European infective endocarditis) registry: a prospective cohort study. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(39):3222–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz620.
Cahill TJ, Baddour LM, Habib G, Hoen B, Salaun E, Pettersson GB, et al. Challenges in infective endocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(3):325–44.
Vincent LL, Otto CM. Infective endocarditis: update on epidemiology, outcomes, and management. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2018;20(86):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-018-1043-2.
Li JS, Sexton DJ, Mick N, Nettles R, Fowler VG, Ryan T, et al. Proposed modifications to the duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30:633–8.
Habib G, Lancellotti P, Antunes MJ, Bongiorni MG, Casalta J-P, Del Zotti F, et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(44):3075–128. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv319.
Marques A, Cruz I, Caldeira D, Alegria S, Gomes AC, Broa AL, et al. Risk factors for in-hospital mortality in infective endocarditis. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020;114(1):1–8.
Guiomar N, Vaz-da-Silva M, Mbala D, Sousa-Pinto B, Monteiro JP, Ponce P, et al. Cirurgia cardíaca na endocardite infeciosa e preditores da mortalidade intra-hospitalar. Rev Port Cardiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repc.2019.08.009.
Ferreira JP, Gomes F, Rodrigues P, Abreu MA, Maia JM, Bettencourt P, et al. Left-sided infective endocarditis: analysis of in-hospital and medium-term outcome and predictors of mortality. Rev Port Cardiol. 2013;32(10):777–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repc.2012.11.015.
Ilhão Moreira R, Coutinho Cruz M, Moura Branco L, Galrinho A, Coutinho Miranda L, Fragata J, et al. Infective endocarditis: surgical management and prognostic predictors. Rev Port Cardiol. 2018;37(5):387–94.
Melo L, Duarte J, Roque D, Oliveira I, Faustino A, Caetano J, et al. Endocardite Infecciosa: Casuística do Departamento de Medicina Interna de um Hospital - Resumo. Med Interna (Bucur). 2017;24(1):19–23.
Habib G, Hoen B, Tornos P, Thuny F, Prendergast B, Vilacosta I, et al. Guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of infective endocarditis (new version 2009): the task force on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of infective endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2009;30(19):2369–413. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehp285.
Instituto Nacional de Estatística. Estimativas da População Residente Portugal, NUTSII, NUTS III. Portal do INE. 2009. www.ine.pt, https://www.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=INE&xpgid=ine_publicacoes&PUBLICACOEStipo=ea&PUBLICACOEScoleccao=107818&PUBLICACOEStema=55466&selTab=tab0&xlang=pt
Fonager K, Lindberg J, Thulstrup AM, Pedersen L, Schønheyder HC, Sørensen HT. Incidence and short-term prognosis of infective endocarditis in Denmark, 1980–1997. Scand J Infect Dis. 2003;35(1):27–30.
Tleyjeh IM, Steckelberg JM, Murad HS, Anavekar NS, Ghomrawi HMK, Mirzoyev Z, et al. Temporal trends in infective endocarditis. J Am Med Assoc. 2005;293(24):3022.
Sy RW, Kritharides L, Raymond W, Sy KL. Healthcare exposure and age in infective endocarditis: results of a contemporary population-based profile of 1536 patients in Australia. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(15):1890–7.
Fedeli U, Schievano E, Buonfrate D, Pellizzer G, Spolaore P. Increasing incidence and mortality of infective endocarditis: a population-based study through a record-linkage system. BMC Infect Dis. 2011;11(1:48):1–7.
Selton-Suty C, Celard M, Le MV, Doco-lecompte T, Chirouze C, Selton-suty C, et al. Preeminence of Staphylococcus aureus in infective endocarditis: a 1-year population-based survey. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54:1230–9.
Duval X, Delahaye F, Alla F, Tattevin P, Obadia JF, Le Moing V, et al. Temporal trends in infective endocarditis in the context of prophylaxis guideline modifications three successive population-based surveys. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(22):1968–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.029.
Pant S, Patel NNJ, Patel NNJ, Badheka A, Mehta JL, Deshmukh A, et al. Trends in infective endocarditis incidence, microbiology, and valve replacement in the United States from 2000 to 2011. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(19):2070–6.
Erichsen P, Gislason GH, Bruun NE. The increasing incidence of infective endocarditis in Denmark, 1994–2011. Eur J Intern Med. 2016;35:95–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2016.05.021.
Keller K, Von BRS, Ostad MA, Hobohm L, Munzel T, Konstantinides S, et al. Temporal trends in the prevalence of infective endocarditis in Germany between 2005 and 2014. Am J Cardiol. 2017;119:317–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.09.035.
Toyoda N, Chikwe J, Itagaki S, Gelijns AC, Adams DH, Egorova NN. Trends in infective endocarditis in California and New York State, 1998–2013. J Am Med Assoc. 2017;317(16):1652–60.
Cresti A, Chiavarelli M, Scalese M, Nencioni C, Valentini S, Guerrini F, et al. Epidemiological and mortality trends in infective endocarditis, a 17-year population-based prospective study. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017;7(1):27–35.
Olmos C, Vilacosta I, Fernández-Pérez C, Bernal JL, Ferrera C, García-Arribas D, et al. The evolving nature of infective endocarditis in Spain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(22):2795–804.
Shah ASV, McAllister DA, Gallacher P, Astengo F, Pérez JAR, Hall J, et al. Incidence, microbiology and outcomes in patient hospitalized with infective endocarditis. Circulation. 2020;141:2067–77.
Jensen AD, Bundgaard H, Butt JH, Bruun NE, Voldstedlund M, Torp-Pedersen C, et al. Temporal changes in the incidence of infective endocarditis in Denmark 1997–2017: a nationwide study. Int J Cardiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.10.029.
Instituto Nacional de Estatistica. Tábuas de Mortalidade 2014–2016. Informação à comunicação social. 2017 [cited 2020 May 1]. p. 1–10. https://www.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=INE&xpgid=ine_destaques&DESTAQUESdest_boui=281117307&DESTAQUESmodo=2.
Instituto Nacional de Estatística. Projeções de População Residente 2015–2080. Portal do INE. 2017 [cited 2020 May 5]. p. 1–19. https://www.esquerda.net/sites/default/files/29projpop2015-2080_pt.pdf.
Murdoch DR, Corey GR, Hoen B, et al. Clinical presentation, etiology and outcome of infective endocarditis in the 21st century: the international collaboration on endocarditis-prospective cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2009;169(5):463–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-0691.12166.
Baddour LM, Wilson WR, Bayer AS, Fowler VG, Tleyjeh IM, Rybak MJ, et al. Infective endocarditis in adults: diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, and management of complications: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;132:1435–86.
Head SJ, Mostafa Mokhles M, Osnabrugge RLJ, Bogers AJJC, Pieter KA. Surgery in current therapy for infective endocarditis. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2011;7(1):255–63.
Yun S, Ph D, Song J, Ph D. Early surgery versus conventional treatment for infective endocarditis. New Eng J Med. 2012;366(26):2466–73.
Lalani T, Cabell CH, Benjamin DK, Lasca O, Naber C, Fowler VG, et al. Analysis of the impact of early surgery on in-hospital mortality of native valve endocarditis: use of propensity score and instrumental variable methods to adjust for treatment-selection bias. Circulation. 2010;121(8):1005–13.
Scott CG, Bailey KR, Steckelberg JM. A systematic review of population-based studies of infective endocarditis. Chest. 2007;132(3):1025–35. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.06-2048.
Khan MZ, Munir MB, Khan MU, Khan SU, Benjamin MM, Balla S. Contemporary trends in native valve infective endocarditis in United States (from the National Inpatient Sample Database). Am J Cardiol. 2020;125(11):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.02.035.
Morita Y, Haruna T, Haruna Y, Nakane E, Yamaji Y, Hayashi H, et al. Thirty-day readmission after infective endocarditis: analysis from a nationwide readmission database. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(9):e011598.
The authors would like to thank the Administração Central dos Sistemas de Saúde (ACSS) for providing the clinical data. We would also like to thank Dr. Adriana Belo from the Portuguese Society of Cardiology and Dr. Carolina Sousa for data management support.
This study has not received any public or private funding.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
A cooperation protocol signed on the 5th July 2017 between the School of Medicine of Lisbon and ACSS aimed at the development of academic investigation projects allowed the access to anonymized data that allows the evaluation of performance data of the National Health System. This study was submitted and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Lisbon Academic Centre (reference number 349/19), the need of informed consent was waived and was according to the Declaration of Helsinki.
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes used to identify infective endocarditis cases and associated factors. Table that contains all the ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes used to identify the different diagnosis codes on the database.
About this article
Cite this article
Sousa, C., Nogueira, P. & Pinto, F.J. Insight into the epidemiology of infective endocarditis in Portugal: a contemporary nationwide study from 2010 to 2018. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 21, 138 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-01937-3
- Infective endocarditis
- Temporal trends