Skip to main content

Predictors of suboptimal coronary blood flow after primary angioplasty and its implications on short-term outcomes in patients with acute anterior STEMI

Abstract

Background

Suboptimal coronary blood flow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a complex multifactorial phenomenon. Although extensively studied, defined modifiable risk factors and efficient management strategy are lacking. This study aims to determine the potential causes of suboptimal flow and associated impact on 30-day outcomes in patients presenting with anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Methods

We evaluated a total of 1104 consecutive patients admitted to our hospital from January 2016 to December 2018 with the diagnosis of anterior wall STEMI who had primary PCI.

Results

Overall, 245 patients (22.2%) had final post-PCI TIMI flow ≤2 in the LAD (suboptimal flow group) and 859 (77.8%) had final TIMI-3 flow (optimal flow group). The independent predictors of suboptimal flow were thrombus burden grade (Odds ratio (OR) 1.848; p < 0.001), age (OR 1.039 per 1-year increase; p < 0.001), low systolic blood pressure (OR 1.017 per 1 mmHg decrease; p < 0.001), total stent length (OR 1.021 per 1 mm increase; p < 0.001), and baseline TIMI flow ≤1 (OR 1.674; p = 0.018). The 30-day rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and cardiac mortality were significantly higher in patients with TIMI flow ≤2 compared to those with TIMI-3 flow (MACE: adjusted risk ratio [RR] 2.021; P = 0.025, cardiac mortality: adjusted RR 2.931; P = 0.031).

Conclusion

Failure to achieve normal TIMI-3 flow was associated with patient-related (age) and other potentially modifiable risk factors (thrombus burden, admission systolic blood pressure, total stent length, and baseline TIMI flow). The absence of final TIMI-3 flow carried worse short-term clinical outcomes.

Peer Review reports

Background

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains the best option for patients presenting with an acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) [1]. While the success rate in the reopening of the thrombotic occlusion can reach up to 95% [2, 3], failure to restore optimal blood flow in the infarct-related coronary artery (i.e., less than thrombolysis in myocardial infarction [TIMI]-3 flow [4]) has been noted in 5–23% of patients and has been associated with adverse clinical outcomes [3, 5, 6]. Many mechanisms have been hypothesized to explain this phenomenon, including the obstruction of epicardial coronary vessels (residual stenosis, thrombus, or dissection) and the disturbances at the level of coronary microcirculation and vascular endothelium (distal embolization of thrombotic materials and plaque debris, leukocyte infiltration, and reperfusion injury) [7, 8]. However, there is a lack of contemporary data on predictors and impacts of suboptimal TIMI flow; and there is still a lack of effective management strategies. We therefore looked at the predictors of suboptimal TIMI flow in patients undergoing primary PCI as well as its impact on 30-day clinical outcomes. Patients with acute anterior STEMI were included to minimize the impact of the left anterior descending (LAD) artery as a strong anatomical risk factor for the development of suboptimal coronary blood flow [9,10,11].

Methods

Study population

This retrospective observational study was performed in the cardiovascular department of First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University (Xi’an, China) and included all patients presenting with anterior wall STEMI from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018. Included patients were at least 18 years old, presented within 12 h of symptom-onset, and underwent primary PCI. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee and informed written consent was obtained from all patients.

Anterior STEMI was defined as typical ischemic chest pain lasting ≥20 min with electrocardiographic (ECG) changes (ST-segment elevation ≥1 mm in ≥2 contiguous precordial leads other than V2 and V3 or new-onset left bundle branch block) with a rise in cardiac biomarkers peaking more than twice normal values [12]. The diagnosis was confirmed by coronary angiography showing a LAD and/or left main (LM) lesion. Exclusions included patients with acute MI onset > 12 h or unknown onset, post-CABG patients, or patients who received thrombolytic therapy or platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors prior to angiography so as not to affect the vessel patency and TIMI flow.

Study protocol

Medical history, risk factors, physical examination, assessment of vital signs and Killip class, emergency and post-procedural ECG, echocardiography, and full laboratory investigations were obtained together with the related catheterization and PCI data. Information on the clinical outcomes was obtained from outpatient visits, emergency records, or telephone interviews.

Prior to the procedure, 300 mg chewable aspirin were given to the patients along with the recommended dose of ticagrelor or clopidogrel and a weight-adjusted bolus dose of heparin (100 units/kg). Other medications were managed according to the prudence of the doctor in charge and within the scope of local clinical approaches. The radial artery was routinely used in almost all cases. Primary PCI was done according to standard techniques [13]. Implantation of a stent(s) to cover the culprit lesion was routinely implied unless the infarct-related artery (IRA) was heavily calcified or the reference luminal diameter was < 2.5 mm; in these situations, a balloon percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) strategy was used. Second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) were used in all cases with routine pre-dilation and post-dilation optimization. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT) were utilized, if needed, in selected cases.

Two experienced interventional cardiologists evaluated each angiogram with emphasis on (1) the grade of the thrombus burden, (2) the total length of stents used to cover the target lesion, (3) the lesion location (proximal, mid, or distal), (4) the presence of calcification, and (5) the TIMI flow before and after the procedure. Final TIMI blood flow in the LAD artery was determined by two experienced cardiologists as follows: TIMI 0 flow (no perfusion) was the absence of antegrade flow distal to the point of occlusion; TIMI 1 flow (penetration without perfusion) was faint and incomplete perfusion of contrast medium around the thrombus; TIMI 2 flow (partial perfusion) was complete, but delayed perfusion of the distal coronary bed; and TIMI 3 flow (complete perfusion) was an antegrade flow to the entire distal bed at a normal rate [4]. The diagnosis of suboptimal flow was further validated by the corrected TIMI frame count (CTFC) using the LAD artery standard landmark (the most distal branch nearest the apex, commonly referred as the whale’s tail) and a cut-off value of ≤27 frames (quantitative TIMI 3 flow), with patients having CTFC > 27 categorized as having suboptimal flow [14]. Suboptimal TIMI flow was TIMI ≤2 flow and/or CTFC > 27 after finishing the procedure, in the absence of dissection, residual stenosis, or spasm [6, 14]. Thrombus burden was categorized into 4 grades according to Siano et al.: Grade 0, no thrombus; Grade 1–3, small thrombus burden; and Grade 4, large thrombus burden [15]. Total ischemic time was the time from symptom-onset to first balloon inflation.

Patients were subclassified according to the total length of the implanted stent(s) into 3 groups: (short, < 29 mm; medium, 29–50 mm; and long, > 50 mm) and examined for the relation between increasing total stent length and the occurrence of suboptimal flow and cardiac mortality.

Clinical outcomes

In this study, we compared the effect of the final TIMI flow on the short-term (30-day) clinical outcomes, including differences in cardiovascular mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, defined as cardiac death, reinfarction, ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization, or ischemic stroke) and post-catheterization reassessment of general and cardiac status, examining for the development of pump failure, cardiogenic shock, mechanical complication, or malignant arrhythmias between the two study groups. A 12-lead ECG was recorded 45–60 min after the procedure and compared with the admission ECG. The arithmetic sum of ST-segment elevation measured at the J point was calculated from leads V1-V6 (± I, aVL). ST-segment resolution (STR) was classified as complete STR (regression ≥70%) or incomplete STR (unaltered or worsened ST elevation or regression < 70%) [16]. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed within 24 h after primary PCI; the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and volumes were estimated. The size of infarction was assessed depending on the measure of the peak serum creatine kinase (CK) value, which was obtained from 3 to 5 serial measurements taken routinely within the first 3 days of admission.

Cardiovascular mortality was defined as any death related to a proximate cardiac cause including arrhythmia, myocardial ischemia and infarction, pump failure, or cardiac arrest. Reinfarction was defined as repeated clinical symptoms or development of new ECG changes associated with a new rise of cardiac troponin (cTn) values >99th percentile upper reference limit (URL) in patients with normal baseline values or an increase of cTn values > 20% of the baseline value when above the 99th percentile URL [12]. Ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR) was defined as repeated revascularization with PCI or coronary artery bypass surgery of the infarct-related artery driven by symptoms or objective evidence of ischemia [13].

Statistical analysis

Statistical data were presented as means and standard deviations or medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) as appropriate. Categorical data were presented as numbers and percentages. Comparisons between groups (optimal vs. suboptimal flow) were made using the independent t-test or the Mann Whitney U-test for normally and non-normally distributed continuous variables, respectively. Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. A stepwise multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the clinical and angiographic predictors of suboptimal TIMI flow. Variables that showed a marginal association with suboptimal flow on univariable testing (P ≤ 0.20) were entered in the multivariable logistic regression model. The variables considered in the model were: age, sex, weight, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, smoking, presenting features (heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, Killip class, and cardiac arrest), total ischemic time, ticagrelor use, lab findings (serum creatinine, triglycerides, HDL and LDL cholesterol, hemoglobin, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and hemoglobinA1c levels), angiographic findings (LM involvement, LAD lesion location, multivessel disease, thrombus burden grade, calcification, baseline TIMI 0/1), number of stents used, total stent length, and mean stent diameter. In the final regression model, only variables with a significant association with suboptimal flow (P < 0.05) were included. Odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to identify the predictive strength of each variable. Propensity score (PS) matching was applied to identify a cohort of patients with comparable baseline clinical and angiographic features. A propensity score was first estimated for each patient by non-parsimonious multiple logistic regression analysis that included all variables listed in Tables 1 and 2. The matching was then carried out with the use of the single nearest-neighbor matching without replacement, whereby the maximum allowed difference for a match was set at 0.05. This yielded two comparable groups with 214 patients in each group. The PS balance was assessed by comparing the standardized mean differences for the propensity score and the other covariates between the two groups before and after matching. For the measured covariates, an absolute standardized difference < 0.1 indicated a negligible difference between the groups. Analyses in the PS-matched cohort were then performed using a paired t-test or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for normally and non-normally distributed continuous variables, respectively; and categorical variables were compared using the McNemar’s or Bowker’s test of symmetry, as appropriate. Risk ratio (RR) and accompanying 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to determine the probabilities of 30-days adverse clinical outcomes. Finally, the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to define the best cut-off values for the total stent length consistent with both suboptimal flow and 30-day mortality. All P-values were two-sided. P-values ≤0.05 were considered as statistically significant. Data management and statistical analysis were done using SPSS vs.21. (IBM, Armonk, New York, the United States).

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of the overall population
Table 2 Angiographic data and primary PCI procedure of the overall population

Results

Clinical characteristics

As shown in (Fig. 1), a total of 1104 anterior STEMI patients were enrolled in this study; 245 (22.2%) had final TIMI flow ≤2 after primary PCI (suboptimal group) and 859 (77.8%) patients had final TIMI flow grade 3 (optimal group). The clinical features, risk factors, and laboratory data have been shown in Table 1. Compared to patients with post-PCI TIMI-3 flow, patients with final suboptimal TIMI flow tended to be older with lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure, higher Killip class at admission, and higher prevalence of cardiac arrest in the emergency department. Additionally, female sex, less smoking, higher baseline serum creatinine, and lower hemoglobin levels were significantly associated with the occurrence of suboptimal post-PCI TIMI flow. On the other hand, there were no significant differences in the total ischemic time or other risk factors between the two study groups.

Fig. 1
figure1

Flowchart of the present study population STEMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft

Angiographic data and primary PCI procedure

As shown in Tables 2 and 3, patients in the suboptimal group had low (≤1) initial TIMI flow, high TIMI thrombus burden grade after wiring, greater need for implantation of ≥1 stent, and longer mean implanted stent length. The glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist tirofiban and thrombus aspiration were used more often in patients with post-PCI TIMI ≤2 flow. The need for hemodynamic support and/or intravenous (IV) infusion of noradrenaline occurred more frequently in the suboptimal group. Intracoronary (IC) arteriolar vasodilators were used in all cases with TIMI ≤2 flow, whether transient or permanent, but were significantly utilized in the suboptimal group. Additionally, there was a non-significant trend in patients with suboptimal TIMI flow to have a proximal LAD or LM lesion location and a larger stent diameter. Conversely, there were no statistical differences in the number of diseased vessels, lesion calcification, or access site selection between the two groups.

Table 3 Cath-lab medications and post-procedural clinical parameters

Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics of the PS-matched population

After performing PS matching, a total of 214 matched patient pairs were created. In the matched cohort, there were no significant differences in baseline clinical or angiographic characteristics (data are presented in Tables 4 and 5). However, IC sodium nitroprusside and IV infusion of noradrenaline were used more frequently in the suboptimal group (Table 3).

Table 4 Clinical characteristics of the propensity-matched population
Table 5 Angiographic data and primary PCI procedure of the propensity-matched population

Independent predictors of suboptimal flow

Multivariable stepwise logistic regression analysis identified thrombus burden grade (OR 1.848; 95% CI 1.532–2.229, p < 0.001), older patient age (OR 1.039 per 1-year increase; 95% CI 1.026–1.052, p < 0.001), lower systolic blood pressure (OR 1.017 per 1 mmHg decrease; 95% CI 1.009–1.025, p < 0.001), increased total stent length (OR 1.021 per 1 mm increase; 95% CI 1.011–1.032, p < 0.001), and baseline TIMI flow ≤1 (OR 1.674; 95% CI 1.094–2.562, p = 0.018) as independent predictors of suboptimal flow after primary PCI in patients with anterior STEMI (Table 6).

Table 6 Multivariable logistic regression analysis of predictors of suboptimal flow after primary PCI

30-day clinical outcomes

The suboptimal group had higher peak CK value, worse LVEF after PCI, lower rates of complete ST-segment resolution, and more prolonged hospital stay than the optimal group (Table 3).

The 30-day clinical outcomes of the total population have been shown in Table 7. Patients with final TIMI flow ≤2 had more 30-day MACE (13.9% vs. 6.1%; unadjusted RR 2.416, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.522–3.833, p < 0.001), cardiac death (7.3% vs. 2.2%; unadjusted RR 3.506, 95% CI 1.810–6.790, p < 0.001), and a higher 30-day incidence of myocardial infarction (7.3% vs. 3.5%; unadjusted RR 2.118, 95% CI 1.163–3.856, p = 0.014) and need for repeat revascularization (6.1% vs. 3.3%; unadjusted RR 1.936, 95% CI 1.017–3.685, p = 0.044). In sub-group analysis, it was observed that patients with longer total implanted stent length had significantly higher rates of both final suboptimal flow (P < 0.001) and 30-day cardiac mortality (P = 0.021), (Fig. 2).

Table 7 30-day clinical outcomes
Fig. 2
figure2

Relationship of total deployed stent(s) length with rates of final suboptimal flow and 30-day cardiac mortality

In the PS-matched cohort, the overall findings were similar. Patients in the suboptimal group had higher peak CK value and worse LVEF post-PCI (Table 3). Cumulative rates of 30-day MACE occurred in 13.6% of anterior STEMI patients with suboptimal TIMI flow vs 6.5% of patients with final TIMI flow 3 (adjusted RR 2.021, 95% CI 1.097–3.535, P = 0.025). Cardiac mortality was higher in STEMI patients with suboptimal TIMI flow (7.0% vs. 2.3%, adjusted RR 2.931, 95% CI 1.073–7.442, P = 0.031). However, there were no significant differences in myocardial infarction (P = 0.108), TVR (P = 0.115), ST-segment resolution (P = 0.108), or total hospital stay (P = 0.864) between the two groups (Tables 3 and 7).

Discussion

The present study identified certain independent predictors of suboptimal TIMI flow and evaluated short-term outcomes of 1104 anterior STEMI patients treated with primary PCI at a median of 5 h after symptom-onset.

The main features of the study can be summarized as follows:

(1) Despite the constant development of PCI techniques, pharmacotherapeutics and interventional devices in the current era, failure to achieve normal TIMI flow occurred in almost one-quarter of anterior STEMI patients and was associated with patient-specific factors (advanced age and low admission systolic blood pressure) and angiographic/procedural factors (baseline TIMI ≤1flow, heavy thrombus burden, and increased total deployed stent length). (2) The 30-day cardiac mortality and MACE rates were significantly greater in patients with TIMI flow ≤2 versus TIMI-3 flow as well as a lower LVEF; increased total CK (indicating larger infarct size); and more frequent heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and malignant arrhythmias.

This study is unique in that it included only patients with acute anterior STEMI having the LAD as the culprit artery and who were presented within 12 h of symptom-onset. Strong points of this study are the relatively large number of patients and the implementation of modern interventional and therapeutic strategies known to improve the outcomes of STEMI patients, including 2nd generations DES, non-compliant (NC) balloon post-dilation, dual antiplatelet therapy, availability of intracoronary imaging, and minimization of the door-to-balloon time. Previous studies were mainly conducted in the era of bare-metal stents or 1st generations DES and included all STEMI patients (not just anterior STEMI) with a time interval extended up to 24 h [9,10,11, 17]. This may in part explain the relatively high rate of suboptimal flow observed in our study (22.2%) compared with previously published rates (5–23%) [3, 5]. Many studies have illustrated the relationship between larger infarct size and the increased prevalence of suboptimal flow [11, 18]; an IRA lesion in the proximal LAD typically accounts for the largest myocardial infarctions [18].

Clinical and angiographic predictors of suboptimal flow

In our study, older patients and those with lower blood pressure had higher rates of suboptimal flow post-PCI. Older patients have more diffuse atherosclerosis, increased calcification, and more distal microembolization [17]. Besides, earlier studies noted that advanced age, LVEF < 50%, increased heart rate, and lower systolic blood pressure (< 90 mmHg) were predictors of suboptimal TIMI flow and higher in-hospital mortality [19,20,21].

Primary PCI in the setting of a ruptured plaque with thrombus and atherosclerotic debris leads to distal embolization of microthrombi and plaque contents [22]. This distal microembolization results in increased distal resistance, multiple microinfarcts, and more myocardial necrosis leading to a reduction of coronary blood flow [23]. In our study, heavy thrombus burden was a powerful independent predictor of suboptimal coronary blood flow post-primary PCI. Conversely, De Luca et al. noted that suboptimal coronary flow can happen even in acute STEMI with minimal thrombus burden, but with longer reperfusion times. Prolonged ischemia can adversely affect the microvascular circulation leading to the development of suboptimal flow [24]. However, in our study, there was no correlation between total ischemic time and final TIMI flow, inconsistent with some [10, 17,18,19], but not all previously published studies [9, 25].

The mean total stent length in the present study was 36.8 mm, noticeably longer than most previous studies [9, 17]. In addition, we performed routine balloon pre-dilation and NC balloon post-dilation after stent deployment to achieve optimum stent expansion and angiographic results. This increasingly used PCI strategy may also help to explain the higher prevalence of suboptimal flow in our contemporary practice. Longer stents and the use of pre- and post-dilation increase the likelihood of mechanical fragmentation with subsequent dislodgement of thrombus and plaque components [26].

In the present study, baseline TIMI flow ≤1 was associated with a final suboptimal flow. This finding is reinforced by the findings of preceding studies which clarified that early and adequately patent IRA is associated with smaller infarct size and enhanced endogenous lysis of thrombotic material meaning lower thrombotic burden and decreased incidence of coronary spasm, distal microembolization and microvascular disruption which are the main mechanisms for suboptimal TIMI flow [9, 10, 24].

Modifiable risk factors and clinical implications

Our findings together with previously published reports emphasize suboptimal coronary blood flow after primary PCI as a main indicator of adverse outcomes. Therefore, early recognition and control of risk factors and proper management of suboptimal TIMI flow are extremely necessary [27]. In the present study, we identified heavy thrombus burden, low admission systolic blood pressure, use of longer stents, and baseline TIMI flow ≤1 as significant and independent risk factors of developing suboptimal flow.

Properly managed heavy thrombus burden with liberal use of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists, aspiration catheters, distal protection devices or mesh-covered embolic protection stents, especially in the presence of other risk factors such as old age and a long target lesion, may improve distal TIMI flow and outcomes in the high-risk patients [28, 29]. An alternative strategy suggested by Isaaz et al. is to give glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors or low dose thrombolytic therapy and delay stenting if a satisfactory antegrade flow is obtained by pre-dilation alone [30].

Longer stent length has been described to be associated with worse outcomes [31], but little is known about the impact of DES length on suboptimal flow and outcomes in patients with acute STEMI. We categorized patients according to the length of the deployed stent(s) vs suboptimal flow and mortality (Fig. 2). We noted that the rates of suboptimal flow almost doubled (16.0% vs. 31.7%, P < 0.001) and mortality rates tripled (1.9% vs. 5.5%; p = 0.019) in patients with longer (total stent length > 50 mm) stents compared to patients with stent length < 29 mm. This suggests an approach of covering the culprit lesion with the shortest stent possible, avoiding unnecessary balloon dilations, and use direct or deferred stenting if feasible [17].

Patients presenting with hypotension and cardiogenic shock are more likely to experience suboptimal flow. Pharmacological management of suboptimal flow in these cases may be challenging, as most of the agents used to reverse the suboptimal flow are vasodilatory and may cause further hypotension. Adequate management of hypotension with vasopressors, IABP, or other hemodynamic support devices in high-risk patients may help to maintain adequate coronary perfusion pressure and overcome microvascular obstruction to improve distal TIMI flow and primary PCI outcomes [19, 20]. Similarly, restoring patency of the IRA as soon as possible is strongly linked to better outcomes [9, 10]. Despite being the best option to achieve IRA patency, primary PCI may not be readily available in all institutions or all geographical regions; in that case the administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors or thrombolytic therapy may be considered to achieve early patency of the IRA when primary PCI is not available or the transfer time is presumed to be prolonged.

There is currently no effective treatment for suboptimal flow, and it is still safer to try to avoid the development of suboptimal flow than to manage it when it is established. Measures should be implied to increase public awareness of the symptoms of heart attacks and the importance of seeking immediate medical care. In addition, efforts to minimize the door-to-balloon time in conjunction with improvements in adjunctive pharmacotherapeutics and interventional techniques are urgently required to help the prevention of this abnormality.

Study limitations

There are several potential limitations to the current study. First, it is a single-center retrospective study. The results are therefore affected by some confounding factors and possible selection bias. Propensity matching and appropriate statistical adjustments were performed to control this limitation, but the influence of some unmeasured confounders cannot be eliminated completely. Second, patients who received thrombolytic therapy or platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors prior to angiography were excluded. In addition, at the time the study was performed, novel anti-platelets (ticagrelor and prasugrel) were administered to a relatively small number of patients, the use of such therapies could have an impact on thrombotic events and would have decreased the incidence of suboptimal flow. Third, we did not assess myocardial blush. Fourth, we did not evaluate microvascular obstruction using specific diagnostic techniques such as cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, contrast echocardiography, or nuclear imaging. Fifth, we did not perform direct stenting; and we used routine balloon pre- and post-dilatation in almost all cases. Finally, long-term follow up was not available.

Conclusions

Suboptimal TIMI flow is the last barrier before the achievement of successful reperfusion after primary PCI. In the present study, failure to restore normal TIMI-3 flow occurred in 22.2% of patients presenting with anterior STEMI and was associated with patient-related (advanced age) and other potentially modifiable risk factors (thrombus burden grade, admission systolic blood pressure, total stent length, and baseline TIMI flow). Absence of final TIMI-3 flow after primary PCI carried worse short-term outcomes and increased 30-day mortality compared to patients in whom TIMI flow was normalized by primary PCI.

Availability of data and materials

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, the data are available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission from the Hospital.

Abbreviations

PCI:

Percutaneous coronary intervention

STEMI:

ST-elevation myocardial infarction

LAD:

Left anterior descending

LM:

Left main

CTFC:

Corrected TIMI frame count

IRA:

Infarct-related artery

PTCA:

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

DES:

Drug-eluting stents

MACE:

Major adverse cardiovascular events

TVR:

Target vessel revascularization

STR:

ST-segment resolution

URL:

Upper reference limit

LVEF:

Left ventricular ejection fraction

CK:

Creatine kinase

PS:

Propensity score

OR:

Odds ratio

CI:

Confidence interval

RR:

Risk ratio

NC:

Non-compliant

References

  1. 1.

    Guarini G, Huqi A, Morrone D, Capozza P, Todiere G, Marzilli M. Pharmacological approaches to coronary microvascular dysfunction. Pharmacol Ther. 2014;144:283–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2014.06.008.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Gibson CM, Schömig A. Coronary and myocardial angiography: angiographic assessment of both epicardial and myocardial perfusion. Circulation. 2004;109:3096–105. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000134278.50359.CB.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Rezkalla SH, Kloner RA. Coronary no-reflow phenomenon: from the experimental laboratory to the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;72:950–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.21715.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Trial: Phase I Findings. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:932–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198504043121437.

  5. 5.

    Bouleti C, Mewton N, Germain S. The no-reflow phenomenon: state of the art. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;108:661–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acvd.2015.09.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ito H. Etiology and clinical implications of microvascular dysfunction in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Int Heart J. 2014;55:185–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Abbate A, Kontos MC, Biondi-Zoccai GGL. No-reflow: the next challenge in treatment of ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:1795–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehn281.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Schwartz BG, Kloner RA. Coronary no reflow. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2012;52:873–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2011.06.009.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Caixeta A, Lansky AJ, Mehran R, Brener SJ, Claessen B, Geńéreux P, et al. Predictors of suboptimal TIMI flow after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: results from the HORIZONS-AMI trial. EuroIntervention. 2013;9:220–7. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJV9I2A37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Mehta RH, Harjai KJ, Cox D, Stone GW, Brodie B, Boura J, et al. Clinical and angiographic correlates and outcomes of suboptimal coronary flow in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:1739–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2003.07.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ndrepepa G, Tiroch K, Keta D, Fusaro M, Seyfarth M, Pache J, et al. Predictive factors and impact of no reflow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3:27–33. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.896225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). Russian J Cardiol. 2019;24:107–38. https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2019-3-107-138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek B, et al. 2015 ACC/AHA/SCAI focused update on primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarctionAn update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention and the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction a report of the American college of cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines and the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions. Circulation. 2016;133:1135–47. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ding S, Pu J, Qiao ZQ, Shan P, Song W, Du Y, et al. TIMI myocardial perfusion frame count: a new method to assess myocardial perfusion and its predictive value for short-term prognosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;75:722–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.22298.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Sianos G, Papafaklis MI, Serruys PW. Angiographic thrombus burden classification in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiol. 2010;22(SUPPL. B):6B–14B.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ndrepepa G, Alger P, Kufner S, Mehilli J, Schömig A, Kastrati A. ST-segment resolution after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Cardiol J. 2012;19:61–9. https://doi.org/10.5603/CJ.2012.0009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kirma C, Izgi A, Dundar C, Tanalp AC, Oduncu V, Soe MA, et al. Clinical and procedural predictors of no-reflow phenomenon after primary percutaneous coronary interventions - experience at a single center. Circ J. 2008;72:716–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Bouleti C, Mathivet T, Serfaty JM, Vignolles N, Berland E, Monnot C, et al. Angiopoietin-like 4 serum levels on admission for acute myocardial infarction are associated with no-reflow. Int J Cardiol. 2015;187:511–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Parodi G, Valenti R, Carrabba N, Memisha G, Moschi G, Migliorini A, et al. Long-term prognostic implications of nonoptimal primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006;68:50–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.20729.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Park JS, Cha KS, Shin D, Lee DS, Lee HW, Oh JH, et al. Prognostic significance of presenting blood pressure in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Hypertens. 2015;28:797–805. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpu230.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Singh M, Mathew V, Garratt KN, Berger PB, Grill DE, Bell MR, et al. Effect of age on the outcome of angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction among patients treated at the Mayo Clinic. Am J Med. 2000;108:187–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9343(99)00429-5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Jaffe R, Dick A, Strauss BH. Prevention and treatment of microvascular obstruction-related myocardial injury and coronary no-reflow following percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic approach. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3:695–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2010.05.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Heusch G, Skyschally A, Kleinbongard P. Coronary microembolization and microvascular dysfunction. Int J Cardiol. 2018;258:17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.02.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    De Luca G, Suryapranata H, Zijlstra F, Van’t Hof AWJ, Hoorntje JCA, Gosselink ATM, et al. Symptom-onset-to-balloon time and mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:991–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00919-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Cannon CP, Gibson CM, Lambrew CT, Shoultz DA, Levy D, French WJ, et al. Relationship of symptom-onset-to-balloon time and door-to-balloon time with mortality in patients undergoing angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. J Am Med Assoc. 2000;283:2941–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.22.2941.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Bae JH, Kwon TG, Hyun DW, Rihal CS, Lerman A. Predictors of slow flow during primary percutaneous coronary intervention: an intravascular ultrasound-virtual histology study. Heart. 2008;94:1559–64. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2007.135822.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Niccoli G, Burzotta F, Galiuto L, Crea F. Myocardial no-reflow in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:281–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.03.054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Prati F, Capodanno D, Pawlowski T, Ramazzotti V, Albertucci M, La Manna A, et al. Local delivery versus intracoronary infusion of abciximab in patients with acute coronary syndromes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3:928–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2010.05.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Dudek D, Dziewierz A, Brener SJ, Abizaid A, Merkely B, Costa RA, et al. Mesh-covered embolic protection stent implantation in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: final 1-year clinical and angiographic results from the MGUARD for acute ST elevation reperfusion trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:e001484. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001484.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Isaaz K, Robin C, Cerisier A, Lamaud M, Richard L, Da Costa A, et al. A new approach of primary angioplasty for ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction based on minimalist immediate mechanical intervention. Coron Artery Dis. 2006;17:261–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Caputo RP, Goel A, Pencina M, Cohen DJ, Kleiman NS, Yen CH, et al. Impact of drug eluting stent length on outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (from the EVENT registry). Am J Cardiol. 2012;110:350–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.03.031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support of China Scholarship Council (CSC). The authors also would like to thank all the staff members of cardiology department in Xi’an Jiaotong University Hospitals.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC1311505) and the Key Project of Research and Development Plan of Shaanxi Province of China (2017ZDCXL-SF-02-04-01).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KE and NG contributed to the conception and design of the work; KE, HU, SA, and XH contributed to the literature search, data analysis for the work, and drafting the manuscript; NG, GM and ZY critically revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zuyi Yuan or Ning Guo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and was reviewed and approved by the Human Subjects Committee of First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University. Written informed consent was obtained from the participant enrolled in this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elakabawi, K., Huang, X., Shah, S.A. et al. Predictors of suboptimal coronary blood flow after primary angioplasty and its implications on short-term outcomes in patients with acute anterior STEMI. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 20, 391 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01673-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Anterior STEMI
  • Primary PCI
  • TIMI flow
  • Short-term outcomes