Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Passive tobacco exposure may impair symptomatic improvement in patients with chronic angina undergoing enhanced external counterpulsation

  • Stilianos Efstratiadis1,
  • Elizabeth D Kennard2,
  • Sheryl F Kelsey2,
  • Andrew D Michaels1Email author and
  • the International EECP Patient Registry-2 Investigators
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders20088:23

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-8-23

Received: 03 August 2007

Accepted: 17 September 2008

Published: 17 September 2008

Abstract

Background

The adverse effects of tobacco abuse on cardiovascular outcomes are well-known. However, the impact of passive smoke exposure on angina status and therapeutic response is less well-established. We examined the impact of second-hand smoke (SHS) exposure on symptomatic improvement in patients with chronic ischemic coronary disease undergoing enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP).

Methods

This observational study included 1,026 non-smokers (108 exposed and 918 not-exposed to SHS) from the Second International EECP Patient Registry. We also assessed angina response in 363 current smokers. Patient demographics, symptomatic improvement and quality of life assessment were determined by self-report prior and after EECP treatment.

Results

Non-smoking SHS subjects had a lower prevalence of prior revascularization (85% vs 90%), and had an increased prevalence of stroke (13% vs 7%) and prior smoking (72% vs 61%; all p < 0.05) compared to non-smokers without SHS exposure. Despite comparable degrees of coronary disease, baseline angina class, medical regimens and side effects during EECP, fewer SHS non-smokers completed a full 35-hour treatment course (77% vs 85%, p = 0.020) compared to non-smokers without SHS. Compared to non-smokers without SHS, non-smoking SHS subjects had less angina relief after EECP (angina class decreased ≥ 1 class: 68% vs 79%; p = 0.0082), both higher than that achieved in current smokers (66%). By multivariable logistic regression, SHS exposure was an independent predictor of failure to symptomatic improvement after EECP among non-smokers (OR 1.81, 95% confidence intervals 1.16–2.83).

Conclusion

Non-smokers with SHS exposure had an attenuated improvement in anginal symptoms compared to those without SHS following EECP.

Background

Epidemiological evidence has unequivocally confirmed that active smoking is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and the leading cause of preventable death [1, 2]. The impact of passive smoking on the cardiovascular system was recognized nearly two decades ago, when evidence of the harmful effects of second-hand smoke (SHS) began to emerge [3, 4]. In the past decade, clinical data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) studies demonstrated that both active and passive smoking were associated with accelerated atherosclerosis progression [5]. Steenland et al reported that the risk of death due to cardiovascular disease (CVD) increases by 30% in non-smokers who live together with smokers [6]. Another study suggested that in the United States more than 50,000 deaths annually from ischemic heart disease are associated with SHS [7]. Epidemiological data suggest a non-linear dose-response relationship between the intensity of exposure to SHS and the risk of ischemic heart disease [8, 9]. The excess risk of developing CVD amounts to 80% in active smokers at the age of 65, but it may also be as high as 30% in passive smokers [10]. Using measurements of the serum concentration of cotinine, a biomarker of smoke exposure, in a large prospective population study, Whincup et al recently concluded that the risk of coronary heart disease related to passive smoke exposure has probably been underestimated in earlier reports and might, in fact, be very close to the risk reported for active smokers [11].

Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) is a non-invasive treatment for chronic, refractory angina that involves the sequential inflation of three sets of lower-extremity cuffs during diastole, leading to increased venous return and cardiac output, systolic unloading, and augmentation of the coronary artery perfusion pressure. EECP has been shown to be effective in treating patients with chronic ischemic coronary artery disease using various measures, including improved functional class [12], reduced anginal symptoms [13], improved quality-of-life indices [14, 15], improved stress cardionuclide perfusion [16, 17], increased exercise time [18, 19], and increased time to ST-segment depression [20]. Treatment with EECP has also been demonstrated to increase nitric oxide levels and decrease malondialdehyde, a marker of lipid peroxidation, as well as to decrease endothelin-1 levels. Moreover, the benefit of EECP has been shown to be sustained at 3- and 5-years after treatment by radionuclide stress testing and quality-of-life measures [21, 22].

There have been several emerging predictors of a lower likehood of benefit from EECP treatment including the presence of diabetes mellitus, prior surgical coronary revascularization and heart failure [23]. Moreover, non-smoking patients undergoing EECP treatment had clearly improved symptom reduction compared to current smokers [23]. We examined the impact of second-hand smoke (SHS) exposure on angina status in patients with refractory angina undergoing EECP treatment.

Methods

The study group consisted of 1,026 non-smoking and 363 current smoking patients treated with EECP for refractory angina enrolled in the Second International EECP Patient Registry (IEPR-II). All patients signed informed written consent prior to entry into the Registry, and the Registry was approved by each center's institutional review board. The primary analyses were performed comparing the non-smokers without SHS exposure (n = 918) and non-smokers with SHS exposure (n = 108). The IEPR-II enrolled consecutive patients treated with EECP for chronic angina in 73 US centers between 2002 and 2004. Briefly, the IEPR-II collected patient demographics, medical history, and coronary artery disease status before and after initiation of EECP therapy. Data were collected prospectively on anginal status according to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification (CCSC), anti-anginal medication use, quality of life and adverse clinical events. The present analysis includes patients who were enrolled from sites reporting ≥ 85% clinical follow-up. Since the IEPR aimed to collect data on as broad a range of patients as possible, the criteria for entry were only that the patient gave informed consent and had at least one hour of EECP treatment for chronic angina. The patients were interviewed by telephone 6 months after the last EECP treatment session, and yearly thereafter in order to record anginal status, quality of life, and adverse cardiac events [24]. Non-smoking is defined as no current tobacco smoking, by self-report. SHS exposure was defined as any exposure to a smoker living in the subject's household.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as percentages for categorical variables or as mean values and standard deviations for continuous variables. Percentages and means are for patients with that data item recorded. Data were missing for fewer than 3% of each variable collected. Comparison of continuous variables between groups was analyzed by Wilcoxon rank tests and for categorical variables by chi-square, Fisher's exact test or Mantel-Henzel tests, as appropriate. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine independent predictors of failure to achieve reduction in angina. All baseline variables associated with the outcome with a p-value of < 0.2 were entered into the preliminary model. A backward selection procedure was used to determine independent, statistically significant predictors. Two-tailed p-values < 0.05 were defined as significant.

Results

Of the 1,026 non-smoking patients who underwent EECP treatment for angina, 108 (10.5%) reported current SHS exposure. Demographic and clinical characteristics, such as the prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, prior myocardial infarction, heart failure, and anginal class, were similar among the two groups of non-smokers (Table 1). There was a slight trend toward more women in the SHS group (47%) compared to the non-SHS non-smokers (26%; p = 0.74). The SHS subjects had a lower mean age (66 ± 13 vs 68 ± 11 years, p = 0.033), with a lower proportion of patients older than 65 years old (53% vs 63%; p = 0.039). SHS subjects had a higher percentage of previous smoking and prior stroke, but had less reported hyperlipidemia. There was no difference in baseline angina severity between those with and without SHS exposure (Table 2).
Table 1

Baseline Demographics and Clinical Characteristics of Non-Smokers Undergoing Enhanced External Counterpulsation

Variables

No SHS Exposure (n = 918)

SHS Exposure (n = 108)

p-value

Age (years ± SD)

68.1 ± 10.7

66.1 ± 11.7

0.033

Male (%)

73.6

65.7

0.081

Hypertension (%)

81.4

83.2

0.66

Hyperlipidemia (%)

93.3

87.6

0.035

Diabetes mellitus (%)

43.6

40.7

0.57

Carotid artery disease (%)

24.9

24.3

0.90

Stroke (%)

6.8

13.2

0.018

Prior smoking (%)

61.0

72.4

0.023

Values are expressed as mean ± SD or percentage

Table 2

Baseline Coronary Disease Factors and Revascularization Status of Non-Smokers Undergoing Enhanced External Counterpulsation

Variables

No SHS Exposure (n = 918)

SHS Exposure (n = 108)

p-value

Interval since CAD diagnosis (yrs)

11.5 ± 8.7

10.9 ± 8.2

0.69

Prior myocardial infarction (%)

69.9

74.8

0.30

Heart failure (%)

24.5

26.4

0.66

Ischemic cardiomyopathy (%)

35.2

41.1

0.23

Left ventricular ejection fraction (%)

47.3 ± 14.4

45.4 ± 14.7

0.25

Prior PCI or CABG (%)

90.4

85.2

0.091

Angina episodes/week

11.8 ± 15.5

13.0 ± 14.2

0.50

Angina class

  

0.16

   I

2.6

1.9

 

   II

5.1

0.9

 

   III

68.3

70.4

 

   IV

24.0

26.9

 

Values are expressed as mean ± SD or percentage

More patients without SHS exposure finished the recommended course of at least 35 hours of treatment (85.4% vs. 76.9%, p = 0.020). The rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft surgery [CABG], percutaneous coronary intervention, death) during the course of EECP therapy was 5.6% for the SHS group, compared to 2.8% for the non-SHS group (p = 0.12). However, there was a higher incidence of unstable angina during EECP in the SHS group (8.3%) compared to the non-SHS non-smoker group (2.6%; p = 0.0014). Other adverse events occurring during the EECP treatment period occurred at a similar rate (Table 3).
Table 3

Clinical Outcomes after Enhanced External Counterpulsation of Non-Smokers Undergoing Enhanced External Counterpulsation

Variables

No SHS Exposure (n = 918)

SHS Exposure (n = 108)

p-value

Death (%)

0.4

1.9

0.12

Myocardial infarction (%)

1.4

1.9

0.67

Unstable angina (%)

2.6

8.3

0.0014

Heart failure exacerbation (%)

1.4

2.8

0.28

Coronary bypass surgery (%)

0.3

0.0

0.55

Percutaneous coronary intervention (%)

1.1

1.9

0.37

MACE (Death/MI/CABG/PCI) (%)

2.8

5.6

0.12

Anginal status (%)

  

0.044

   No angina

16.3

17.9

 

   Class I

24.2

16.0

 

   Class II

37.0

31.1

 

   Class III

17.3

23.6

 

   Class IV

5.3

11.3

 

Angina decreased ≥ 1 class

79.2

67.9

0.0082

Values are expressed as mean ± SD or percentage

Table 4

List of IEPR-2 investigators

Site Name

Location

Investigator Name

Coordinator Name

Advanced Heart Care

Paris, TX, United States

Jeffrey R. Gladden, MD

Diane James

Associates in Cardiovascular Medicine

Westerville, OH, United States

Andrew P. Klaus, MD

Brett Elliott, BS

Avera McKennan Hospital – Cardiovascular/Stress

Sioux Falls, SD, United States

Kevin Vaska, MD

Carol Scholten, RN

Borgess Health & Fitness Center

Kalamazoo, MI, United States

Alice Williams, DO

Julie Johnson

Cardiology Consultants Ltd.

Belleville, IL, United States

Atal S. Shar, MD

Donna Mann, RN

Cardiology Consultants PC

Albany, GA, United States

Steven C. Wolinsky, DO

Kimberly Bryan, LPN

Cardiovascular Research Institute, Inc.

Columbus, OH, United States

Bruce Fleishman, MD

Karen Manzo, RN

Cardiovascular Specialists

Sandwich, MA, United States

Bruce Levy, MD

Mary Cassidy

Central Arkansas Cardiology

N. Little Rock, AR, United States

Charles Caldwell, MD

Carrie Limberg, LPN

Central Baptist Hospital

Lexington, KY, United States

Pam Gage, RN

Nanette Abrams, RN

Christ Hospital and Medical Center

Oak Lawn, IL, United States

Marc Silver, MD

Carol Pisano, RN

Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Cleveland, OH, United States

Stephen Ellis, MD

Jeanette Mitchell, RN

Consultants in Cardiovascular Disease

Erie, PA, United States

William L. Mecca, MD

Monica Chase

Creighton University Cardiac Center

Omaha, NE, United States

Paul Biddle, MD

Megan McCarthy

ECP Heart center

Las Vegas, NV, United States

Blaine Purcell, MD

Ambar Faridi

Edgardo Bermudez, MD

Ponce, PR, United States

Edgardo Bermudez, MD

Arlene Rivera

EECP Center of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, PA, United States

Thomas Pinto, MD

Louanne Tempich, LPN

EECP of Nassau

Valley Stream, NY, United States

Edward T. Davison, MD

Mary Getz, RN

Elliot Hospital

Manchester, NH, United States

Robert Lavery, MD, FACC

Diane Carrier, RN

Granite Medical Group

Quincy, MA, United States

Alan Berrick, MD

Barbara Brangiforte, LPN

Griffin Hospital

Derby, CT, United States

Kenneth V. Schwartz, MD

Judy Grenon, RN

Heart Centers of America, LLC

Portland, OR, United States

Ronald Schutz, MD

Ardys Hawkins, RN

Hennepin County Medical Center

Minneapolis, MN, United States

Brad Bart, MD

Melissa Borell

Indiana Heart Associates, PC

Indianapolis, IN, United States

Don Zipperman, MD

Shawna Toombs, EMT

Jackson Purchase Medical Center

Mayfield, KY, United States

Tyrone Daniels, MD

Regina Williams, RRT

JFK Medical Center

Atlantis, FL, United States

Norman Erenrich, MD

Angelica Patten, RN

Knoxville Cardiovascular Group

Knoxville, TN, United States

Stuart Bresee, MD

Teresa Boling

Long Island Heart Associates

Mineola, NY, United States

Steven Zeldis, MD

Robert J. Mullan

Mayo Clinic, St. Mary's Hospital

Rochester, MN, United States

Gregory Barsness, MD

Linda Tesmer, RN

Medical Institute of New Jersey

Cedar Knolls, NJ, United States

Leonard Moss, MD

Ellen Pateman, RN

Medicor Cardiology

Bridgewater, NJ, United States

Kenneth Sternberge, MD

Luz Vanegas, LPN

Mercy Hospital Medical Center

Des Moines, IA, United States

William J. Wickemeyer, MD

Donna Gideon

Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation

Minneapolis, MN, United States

Timothy Henry, MD

Terri Streufert, RN

Missouri Heart Center

Columbia, MO, United States

James Elliott, MD

Jeanette Quick, RN

Moffitt Heart & Vascular Group

Wormleysburg, PA, United States

Jeffrey Mandak, MD

Anita Todd, RN

North Suburban Cardiology Group, Ltd.

Arlington Heights, IL, United States

Edward Pinsel, M.D.

Laura Clemens, RN

Northwest Ohio Cardiology Consultants

Toledo, OH, United States

Todd L. Monroe, MD

Diane Philip, RN

Oregon Cardiology

Eugene, OR, United States

Jay Chappell, MD

Christi Flood

Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center

Camden, NJ, United States

Jan R. Weber, M.D.

Cheryl Marks, RN

Scripps Center for Integrative Medicine

La Jolla, CA, United States

Erminia Guarneri, M.D.

Eva Stuart, RN

Shady Grove Adventist Hospital Cardiac Rehab

Rockville, MD, United States

Dennis Friedman, MD

Gail Driskill, RN

St. Lukes Hospital

Cedar Rapids, IA, United States

Michael Chandra, MD

Deb O'Neil, RN

Staten Island Heart

Staten Island, NY, United States

James Lafferty, MD

Laura Ferrara, RN, CRN

Stony Brook University Hospital

Stony Brook, NY, United States

William E. Lawson, MD

Denise D'Ambrosia, FNPC

Susquehanna Cardiology Associates

Williamsport, PA, United States

Donald Nardone, MD

Gwen Hill, RN

The Angina Center of Evansville

Evansville, IN, United States

Ralph Millsaps, MD

Joseph Winterman, RN

The Heart Care Group, PC

Allentown, PA, United States

James A. Pantano, MD

Ruth Ann Gerchufsky

The Heart Group

Evansville, IN, United States

Jerry Becker, MD

Lori Hunt, RN

University of Pittsburgh Medical

Center Pittsburgh, PA, United States

Ozlem Soran, MD

Renee Litrun, CVT

University of Virginia

Charlottesville, VA, United States

George Beller, MD

Ellen Longmoore, CNMT

Wake Heart Associates

Raleigh, NC, United States

R. Lee Jobe, MD

Sharon Knight, RRT

Wichita EECP Heart Center

Wichita, KS, United States

Roger Evans, MD

Linda Rae Hillier, RN

William Beaumont Hospital

Royal Oak, MI, United States

Peter McCullough, MD

Liberty Van Eik

Wisconsin Heart

Madison, WI, United States

John Moses, MD

Ramona Van

York Hospital Cardiac Rehab.

York, PA, United States

Kevin McCullum, MD

Cindy Yingling, RN

Cardiology Consultants Ltd.

Belleville, IL, United States

Atal S. Shar, MD

Donna Mann, RN.

After completion of EECP therapy, angina decreased by ≥ 1 class in 68% of the SHS non-smoker group, compared to 79% of the non-SHS non-smoker group (p = 0.0082) both higher than the 66% angina reduction achieved by the current smoking group (Figure 1). Eleven percent of the SHS non-smoker group remained in class IV angina after EECP, compared to only 5% in the non-SHS non-smoker group (p = 0.014). Medical therapy, including beta-blocker, calcium channel blocker, angiotension-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin receptor blocker, antiplatelet, diuretic and hypolipidemic medications, remained similar after EECP in both non-smoking groups.
Figure 1

Change in angina class from pre- to post-enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) treatment for non-smokers without (n = 918) and with (n = 108) second-hand smoke exposure (SHS), and current smokers (n = 363).

A multivariable logistic regression model showed the only independent significant predictors of failure to achieve angina reduction were: SHS exposure (odds ratio 1.81, 95% confidence interval 1.16–2.83), age ≤ 55 years (odds ratio 2.10, 95% CI 1.41–3.13), and mild angina (CCSC I/II) pre-EECP (odds ratio 2.70, 95% CI 1.64 – 4.46).

Discussion

In this large cohort of patients with refractory angina undergoing EECP, SHS exposure was an independent predictor of failure to achieve a reduction in angina class after treatment among non-smokers. Only 68% of those non-smoking subjects with SHS had a reduction in angina class, compared to 79% of the non-smokers without SHS exposure. This low level of angina reduction is comparable to that achieved among current cigarette smokers (66%). Moreover, the SHS group had a higher rate of adverse unstable angina cardiac events during the course of EECP compared to non-smokers without SHS exposure.

Prior clinical studies observed impaired endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation, the earliest sign of endothelial dysfunction, in smokers [2527]. Passive smokers, defined as those with SHS exposure, exhibited abnormal endothelium-dependent vasodilatation to a similar extent as that seen with current smokers [28]. Sumida et al found that passive smoking changes acetylcholine-induced coronary artery relaxation into vasoconstriction [29]. In another study, coronary flow reserve, although higher in non-smokers than in active smokers under control conditions, was similar in the two groups after a 30-minute exposure to SHS [30]. These findings indicate that the relatively low doses of toxins inhaled by passive smoking are sufficient to elicit a strong acute response. It is noteworthy that the effects of SHS are acute and substantial, nearly as large compared to chronic active smoking (averaging between 80% and 90%) [31].

The agents and pathways responsible for these functional changes of endothelial function have not yet been completely elucidated, but they may be related, at least in part, to the inactivation of nitric oxide (NO) [17]. Animal studies have suggested that passive smoking reduces the activity of endothelial NO synthase [possibly due to the action of carbon monoxide (CO)] [32] and the endothelial arginine content [33]. In accordance with these results, it was shown that L-arginine supplementation prevented endothelial dysfunction induced by SHS in rabbits [32] and reduced the infarct size in SHS-exposed rats [34].

EECP has been shown to increase c-GMP production, which promotes vascular smooth muscle tone and improves arterial function [35]. EECP also progressively increased plasma nitric oxide levels in patients who received 1-hour daily treatments over 6 weeks by 62% compared to baseline improving endothelial function [36]. Therefore, passive smoking could attenuate the vascular effects of EECP by preventing the release of nitric oxide induced by the shear forces generated by EECP.

A limitation of this analysis was the assessment of SHS exposure. By defining SHS exposure as only house-hold exposure, we may have underestimated the proportion of subjects with occupational SHS. However, the vast majority of patients undergoing EECP have severe angina, and are not employed outside the home. Self-reporting of the SHS status may be a limitation. There may be other unmeasured confounding variables, such as obesity, poor diet, and physical inactivity, which may be associated with SHS. Our database was not able to capture these potential confounding variables. The IEPR-2 Registry was designed as a cohort study of patients undergoing EECP and provides a rich data set for exploration. As with many analyses of the Registry data, the SHS hypothesis was not pre-specified; this should be kept in mind in the interpretation of the findings.

Conclusion

In conclusion, SHS may reduce the anti-anginal effects of EECP among non-smokers. This reduced success rate of EECP in SHS non-smokers is comparable to that seen in current cigarette smokers. These findings are consistent with studies showing that SHS exposure reduces nitric oxide production, which is an important mechanism for the clinical benefit seen with EECP.

Abbreviations

ARIC: 

Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities

CABG: 

Coronary artery bypass graft surgery

CCSC: 

Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification

CO: 

Carbon Monoxide

CVD: 

Cardiovascular disease

EECP: 

Enhanced external counterpulsation

IEPR-II: 

Second International EECP Patient Registry

MACE: 

Major adverse cardiovascular events

NO: 

Nitric oxide

SHS: 

second-hand smoke

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The IEPR-2 investigators include:

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Utah
(2)
Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh

References

  1. Glantz SA, Parmley WW: Passive smoking and heart disease. Mechanisms and risk. JAMA. 1995, 273: 1047-1053. 10.1001/jama.273.13.1047.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Prevention. ENfSP: Smoke Free Workplaces: Improving the health and the wellbeing of people at work. 2001, Brussels: European Network for Smoking PreventionGoogle Scholar
  3. 1986 Surgeon General's report: the health consequences of involuntary smoking. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1986, 35: 769-770.Google Scholar
  4. Taylor BV, Oudit GY, Kalman PG, Liu P: Clinical and pathophysiological effects of active and passive smoking on the cardiovascular system. Can J Cardiol. 1998, 14: 1129-1139.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Howard G, Wagenknecht LE, Burke GL, Diez-Roux A, Evans GW, McGovern P, Nieto FJ, Tell GS: Cigarette smoking and progression of atherosclerosis: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. JAMA. 1998, 279: 119-124. 10.1001/jama.279.2.119.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Steenland K: Passive smoking and the risk of heart disease. JAMA. 1992, 267: 94-99. 10.1001/jama.267.1.94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Wells AJ: Passive smoking as a cause of heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994, 24: 546-554.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Barnoya J, Glantz SA: Secondhand smoke: the evidence of danger keeps growing. Am J Med. 2004, 116: 201-202. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.11.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Howard GTM: Why is environmental tobacco smoke more strongly associated with coronary heart disease than expected? A review of potential biases and experimental data. Environ Heath Perspect. 1999, 107: 853-858. 10.2307/3434565.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Report of the Scientific Committee on Tobacco and Health: Secondhand smoke: review of evidence since 1998: update of evidence of health effects of secondhand smoke. 2004, London: The Stationery OfficeGoogle Scholar
  11. Whincup PH, Gilg JA, Emberson JR, Jarvis MJ, Feyerabend C, Bryant A, Walker M, Cook DG: Passive smoking and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: prospective study with cotinine measurement. Bmj. 2004, 329: 200-205. 10.1136/bmj.38146.427188.55.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Lawson WE, Hui JC, Lang G: Treatment benefit in the enhanced external counterpulsation consortium. Cardiology. 2000, 94: 31-35. 10.1159/000007043.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fitzgerald CP, Lawson WE, Hui JC, Kennard ED, IEPR Investigators: Enhanced external counterpulsation as initial revascularization treatment for angina refractory to medical therapy. Cardiology. 2003, 100: 129-135. 10.1159/000073930.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Arora RR, Chou TM, Jain D, Fleishman B, Crawford L, McKiernan T, Nesto R, Ferrans CE, Keller S: Effects of enhanced external counterpulsation on health-related quality of life continue 12 months after treatment: a substudy of the Multicenter Study of Enhanced External Counterpulsation. J Investig Med. 2002, 50: 25-32. 10.2310/6650.2002.33514.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fricchione GL, Jaghab K, Lawson W, Hui JC, Jandorf L, Zheng ZS, Cohn PF, Soroff H: Psychosocial effects of enhanced external counterpulsation in the angina patient. Psychosomatics. 1995, 36: 494-497.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lawson WE, Hui JC, Soroff HS, Zheng ZS, Kayden DS, Sasvary D, Atkins H, Cohn PF: Efficacy of enhanced external counterpulsation in the treatment of angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 1992, 70: 859-862. 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90727-G.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Masuda D, Nohara R, Hirai T, Kataoka K, Chen LG, Hosokawa R, Inubushi M, Tadamura E, Fujita M, Sasayama S: Enhanced external counterpulsation improved myocardial perfusion and coronary flow reserve in patients with chronic stable angina; evaluation by (13)N-ammonia positron emission tomography. Eur Heart J. 2001, 22: 1451-1458. 10.1053/euhj.2000.2545.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lawson WE, Hui JC, Guo T, Burger L, Cohn PF: Prior revascularization increases the effectiveness of enhanced external counterpulsation. Clin Cardiol. 1998, 21: 841-844.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lawson WE, Hui JC, Zheng ZS, Burgen L, Jiang L, Lillis O, Oster Z, Soroff H, Cohn P: Improved exercise tolerance following enhanced external counterpulsation: cardiac or peripheral effect?. Cardiology. 1996, 87: 271-275.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Arora RR, Chou TM, Jain D, Fleishman B, Crawford L, McKiernan T, Nesto RW: The multicenter study of enhanced external counterpulsation (MUST-EECP): effect of EECP on exercise-induced myocardial ischemia and anginal episodes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999, 33: 1833-1840. 10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00140-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lawson WE, Hui JC, Cohn PF: Long-term prognosis of patients with angina treated with enhanced external counterpulsation: five-year follow-up study. Clin Cardiol. 2000, 23: 254-258.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lawson WE, Hui JC, Zheng ZS, Oster Z, Katz JP, Diggs P, Burger L, Cohn CD, Soroff HS, Cohn PF: Three-year sustained benefit from enhanced external counterpulsation in chronic angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 1995, 75: 840-841. 10.1016/S0002-9149(99)80427-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lawson WE, Kennard ED, Hui JC, Kennard ED, IEPR Investigators: Analysis of baseline factors associated with reduction in chest pain in patients with angina pectoris treated by enhanced external counterpulsation. Am J Cardiol. 2003, 92: 439-44. 10.1016/S0002-9149(03)00662-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Barsness G, Feldman AM, Holmes DR, Holubkov R, Kelsey SF, Kennard ED, International EECP Patient Registry Investigators: The International EECP Patient Registry (IEPR): design, methods, baseline characteristics, and acute results. Clin Cardiol. 2001, 24: 435-442.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Georgakopoulos D, Bull C, Thomas O, Robinson J, Deanfield JE: Cigarette smoking is associated with dose-related and potentially reversible impairment of endothelium-dependent dilation in healthy young adults. Circulation. 1993, 88: 2149-2155.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Heitzer T, Ylä-Herttuala S, Luoma J, Kurz S, Münzel T, Just H, Olschewski M, Drexler H: Cigarette smoking potentiates endothelial dysfunction of forearm resistance vessels in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Role of oxidized LDL. Circulation. 1996, 93: 1346-1353.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Zeiher AM, Schachinger V, Minners J: Long-term cigarette smoking impairs endothelium-dependent coronary arterial vasodilator function. Circulation. 1995, 92: 1094-1100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Celermajer DS, Adams MR, Clarkson P, Robinson J, McCredie R, Donald A, Deanfield JE: Passive smoking and impaired endothelium-dependent arterial dilatation in healthy young adults. N Engl J Med. 1996, 334: 150-154. 10.1056/NEJM199601183340303.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Sumida H, Watanabe H, Kugiyama K, Ohgushi M, Matsumura T, Yasue H: Does passive smoking impair endothelium-dependent coronary artery dilation in women?. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998, 31: 811-815. 10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00010-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Otsuka R, Watanabe H, Hirata K, Tokai K, Muro T, Yoshiyama M, Takeuchi K, Yoshikawa J: Acute effects of passive smoking on the coronary circulation in healthy young adults. JAMA. 2001, 286: 436-441. 10.1001/jama.286.4.436.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Barnoya J, Glantz SA: Cardiovascular effects of secondhand smoke: nearly as large as smoking. Circulation. 2005, 111: 2684-2698. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.492215.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnson FK, Johnson RA: Carbon monoxide promotes endothelium-dependent constriction of isolated gracilis muscle arterioles. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2003, 285: R536-541.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hutchison SJ, Sievers RE, Zhu BQ, Sun YP, Stewart DJ, Parmley WW, Chatterjee K: Secondhand tobacco smoke impairs rabbit pulmonary artery endothelium-dependent relaxation. Chest. 2001, 120: 2004-2012. 10.1378/chest.120.6.2004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhu B, Sun Y, Sievers RE, Shuman JL, Glantz SA, Chatterjee K, Parmley WW, Wolfe CL: L-arginine decreases infarct size in rats exposed to environmental tobacco smoke. Am Heart J. 1996, 132: 91-100. 10.1016/S0002-8703(96)90395-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Levenson J, Pernollet MG, Iliou MC, Devynck MA, Simon A: Cyclic GMP release by acute enhanced external counterpulsation. Am J Hypertens. 2006, 19: 867-872. 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2006.01.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Akhtar M, Wu GF, Du ZM, Zheng ZS, Michaels AD: Effect of external counterpulsation on plasma nitric oxide and endothelin-1 levels. Am J Cardiol. 2006, 98: 28-30. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.01.053.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2261/8/23/prepub

Copyright

© Efstratiadis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement