Skip to main content
Download PDF

Acute heart failure associated with toxic shock syndrome due to methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus during the postpartum period: case report and systematic literature review

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders volume 22, Article number: 452 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Toxic shock syndrome (TSS) caused by Staphylococcus aureus in the postpartum period is a rare but life-threatening disease. We present a case of acute heart failure as the initial presentation of TSS due to methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and describe its clinical characteristics with a systematic literature review.

Case presentation

A 34-year-old woman, 8 days after a normal vaginal delivery presented to our hospital with dyspnea and fever. She had jugular venous distension, bilateral leg edema, and erythema. Laboratory examinations revealed elevated NT-pro-BNP level of 3,233 pg/mL. Transthoracic echocardiography showed elevated tricuspid regurgitation peak gradient, with decreased respiratory variability of the inferior vena cava diameter and bilateral pleural effusions. The patient was hospitalized with suspicion of congestive heart failure. MSSA positive for toxic shock syndrome exotoxin-1 was detected in the culture of the perineal incision wound, and we diagnosed TSS caused by MSSA. Intravenous diuretics were administered, along with eventual cefazolin plus clindamycin. After 2 weeks of antimicrobial therapy, the patient showed improvement and was discharged. No recurrence was observed at the 24-month follow-up.

Conclusion

This is a rare case report of acute heart failure being the initial manifestation of TSS due to MSSA in the postpartum period. Clinicians should consider TSS as a possibility in postpartum patients with acute heart failure. This systematic review provides insights into its clinical features, treatment regimens, and prognosis of TSS by S. aureus in the postpartum period. TSS requires an appropriate, prompt diagnosis, because delayed treatment can be fatal.

Peer Review reports

Background

Toxic shock syndrome (TSS) is a syndrome caused by toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (TSST-1), an exotoxin produced by Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), which leads to various severe clinical symptoms, such as generalized erythema, hypotension, septic shock, and multiple organ failure [1]. As Todd et al. first reported TSS in 1978, TSS is a rare but life-threatening disease, and it has later been classified into menstruation-related and non-menstruation-related types [2]. Ever since Whitefield et al. reported TSS in the postpartum period in 1981, non-menstrual TSS has been increasingly reported [3]. Although there are diagnostic guidelines published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for TSS, early diagnosis is difficult because of the diversity of its symptoms [4]. Therapeutic intervention is often delayed by misdiagnosis, emphasizing the importance of awareness of this disease among healthcare professionals [5].

Heart failure during the postpartum period is an extremely uncommon manifestation of TSS, as noted in the present case. To clarify the clinical characteristics of TSS caused by S. aureus during the postpartum period, we conducted a systematic literature review to determine the prognosis, complication rate of heart failure, and treatment strategy. Herein, we present the case report of acute heart failure as the initial presentation of TSS due to methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and describe its clinical characteristics in a systematic review of TSS due to S. aureus in the postpartum period.

Case presentation

A 34-year-old woman without significant past medical history presented to our emergency department with acute onset of dyspnea three days prior. Eight days prior to admission, she delivered vaginally at a gestational age of 39 weeks. Her pregnancy progress was fairly good, except she had a huge (goose-egg size) perineal varicose veins on her right side, therefore episiotomy was performed on her left side considering the risk of rupture of varicose. She had no neither present nor past alcohol intake, smoking history, nor was she taking any regular medications. A 12-lead ECG 3 months prior to the delivery showed no abnormal findings. On admission, the patient was in mild distress and had a temperature of 37.1 °C, blood pressure of 123/74 mmHg, heart rate of 121/min, respiratory rate of 30/min, and oxygen saturation of 86% on room air. Physical examination revealed erythema on the face and trunk with bilateral lower leg pitting edema, jugular vein distension, perineal varicose veins, and redness with purulent discharge at the episiotomy site. Laboratory data showed hemoglobin of 9.1 g/dL with the mean corpuscular volume of 82.5 fL, white blood cell count of 16,200/μL (87% neutrophils, 4% lymphocytes, 6% monocytes, and 3% eosinophils), aspartate aminotransferase of 69 U/L, alanine aminotransferase of 64 U/L, lactate dehydrogenase of 304 U/L, C-reactive protein (CRP) of 26.9 mg/dL, creatine kinase-muscle-brain of 14 U/L, cardiac troponin T 0.037 ng/mL, and the N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide of 3,233 pg/mL. Electrolytes and renal function were normal. Other diagnostic workups, including IgM antibodies for Coxsackie virus, echovirus, cytomegalovirus, adenovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, herpes simplex, and varicella-zoster virus, were all negative. A 12 lead ECG clearly demonstrated a normal sinus rhythm. Chest radiography revealed pulmonary venous congestion and Kerley's B-line in both the lungs. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the chest-abdomen-pelvis demonstrated bilateral pleural effusion and conspicuous interstitial thickening, a finding of pulmonary edema, and no signs of intrauterine or perineal abscess (Fig. 1). Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) revealed unremarkable left ventricular size and wall thickness with a normal ejection fraction (62.4%; disk method). The echocardiographic four-chamber image is shown in Video 1, and a dilated inferior vena cava (IVC) of 21.7/18.4 mm (inspiration and expansion during expiration) is shown in Video 2. The findings of each measurement are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. Regarding parameters associated with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, this patient had a septal eʼ < 7 cm/s, a peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity > 2.8 m/s, and a resting tricuspid regurgitation peak gradient (TRPG) of 41 mmHg. The left atrial volume index (LAVI) was 27 ml/m2, and the E/e' (average) was 12.6. These values corresponded to having an intermediate left ventricular diastolic dysfunction [6]. Furthermore, TTE showed no evidence of cardiac vegetations. The patient was admitted to the intensive coronary care unit on suspicion of infection-induced acute heart failure, postpartum cardiomyopathy, or viral myocarditis.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Computed Tomography on arrival at the hospital. A The chest CT (non-contrast) revealed bilateral pleural effusions, interlobular septal thickening in both lungs, and ground glass opacification in both lungs. The findings are consistent with pulmonary edema. B Contrast-enhanced CT showed no contrast defect in the pulmonary artery and only an enlarged uterus due to postpartum. There were no abnormal findings in other organs. CT, Computed Tomography

Full size image
Table 1 Echocardiographic findings at initial admission and after clinical improvement
Full size table
Table 2 Characteristics of patients with toxic shock syndrome due to Staphylococcus aureus during the postpartum period
Full size table

We empirically administered 2 g of intravenous (IV) ceftriaxone every 24 h and metronidazole 500 mg IV every 8 h. We added 2 g of IV ampicillin every 4 h for the possibility of streptococcal toxic shock syndrome (STSS) caused by β-hemolytic streptococci and 600 mg of IV clindamycin every 8 h for its inhibitory effect on toxin synthesis. Percutaneous drainage and washing of the perineal wound were performed daily after admission. In addition, furosemide 20 mg/day was started intravenously, and two units of packed red blood cells were administered. Cultures obtained from the perineum grew only MSSA. Pharyngeal cultures, blood cultures, and urine cultures were negative. Changes in chest X-ray over time during hospitalization are shown in Fig. 2. On the fourth day of admission, chest radiography showed enhanced pulmonary vascular shadows, and respiratory status deteriorated. We performed right heart catheterization to differentiate between worsening heart failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). It revealed a cardiac index of 4.2 L/min/m2, pulmonary artery wedge pressure of a28/v24/24 mmHg, mean pulmonary artery pressure of 36 mmHg, and body vascular resistance of 422.2 dyne-sec/cm−5, findings consistent with high flow heart failure and low peripheral vascular resistance associated with infection, so we introduced a high-flow nasal cannula. The furosemide dose was increased to 80 mg/day. On the eighth day after admission, the patient developed diarrhea with negative Clostridioides difficile culture, toxin, and antigen tests. On the 10th day of admission, TSST-1 was positive and this patient had a fever, rash, desquamation, and hypotension, as well as diarrhea, vaginal hyperemia, and liver dysfunction, so we diagnosed TSS caused by MSSA according to the CDC 2011 Case Definition of Toxic Shock Syndrome (other than Streptococcal) [4]. On the same day, antimicrobial therapy was changed to 2 g of IV cefazolin every 8 h and completed for a total of two weeks of treatment. Laboratory tests showed that CRP peaked at 42 mg/dL on the third day of admission and then gradually decreased, and NT-pro-BNP also declined to 171.1 pg/mL at the time of discharge (Fig. 3). As shown in Table 1, subsequent echocardiographic findings also showed a trend toward improvement in left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, and TRPG decreased to the normal range. Her respiratory condition improved quickly, and the patient’s fingers and face desquamated on the eleventh day. The patient was clinically stable and discharged on hospital day 15, and no recurrence of heart failure or infections was observed during 24 months of follow-up.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Changes in chest radiographs during hospitalization. A Day 1 chest X-ray (Upright position) revealed pulmonary vascular congestion, peribronchial cuffing, fluffy alveolar opacities, and Kerley B lines in both lungs. B Day 5 chest X-ray (Supine position) showed consolidation in both lung fields was markedly widened, and pleural effusion tended to increase, indicating exacerbation of pulmonary edema. The patient's respiratory failure worsened, and a Swan-Ganz catheter was inserted. C Day 10 chest X-ray (Upright position) showed the degree of cardiac enlargement was reduced, the enhancement of pulmonary vascular shadows was lessened, and pleural effusions decreased. D Day 14 chest X-ray (Upright position) showed that consolidation in both lung fields further improved, and the bilateral pleural effusions disappeared

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Clinical course timeline. CRP, C-reactive protein; NT-pro-BNP, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; AMPC, amoxicillin; MNZ, metronidazole; CLDM, clindamycin; CTRX, Ceftriaxone; CFPM, Cefepime; CEZ, cefazolin; NC, Nasal Cannula; IV, intravenous

Full size image

Discussion and conclusions

TSS is a life-threatening disease; therefore, early diagnosis and appropriate treatment are required. Half of the reported staphylococcal TSS cases are non-menstrual [7, 8]. The causes of non-menstrual related TSS include vaginal and cesarean deliveries, surgical and wound infections [9, 10], post-miscarriage [11], mastitis [12], bacterial laryngotracheitis [13], sinusitis [14], arthritis [15], enteritis [16], and skin lesions [17]. Among them, TSS associated with surgical sites or wounds is more difficult to diagnose, because it may occur in the absence of obvious signs of infection in the wound [18]. In a previous report, identifying the primary source was difficult in approximately 40% of cases, indicating that it is not easy to identify the local findings that cause infection [19]. Current diagnostic criteria for TSS, as published by the CDC, include fever, rash, desquamation, hypotension, and multisystem involvement, including gastrointestinal, muscular, renal, and hepatic involvement [4]. In the current case, fever, rash, desquamation, and hypotension were all present, and, in terms of the multisystem involvement, diarrhea, vaginal hyperemia, and elevated liver enzyme levels were observed. In addition, the identification of S. aureus from the lochia, incisions, and the exclusion of other diseases led to the diagnosis of TSS. However, only the minor redness of the trunk and mild vaginal inflammation were seen at the time of admission, and our patient mainly showed signs of heart failure, indicating the difficulty of recognizing the primary source and the importance of identifying it.

We conducted a systematic review using MeSH terms and made database including authors information, titles, abstracts, and languages by using them. Three researchers independently searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Ichushi-Web from their inception to August 1, 2022, to review and extract relevant cases. The respective search strategies for PubMed, EMBASE, and Ichushi-web are described in Fig. 4; 24 articles were retrieved, two of which describe two cases of postpartum TSS [3, 12, 20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41]. As a result, we found 27 cases of TSS due to S. aureus during the postpartum period. The summary and detailed information on the clinical characteristics of the 27 cases, including our case, are shown in Table 1. The median age of the patients was 28 years. Common symptoms were fever in 100% of patients (27/27 cases), followed by gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal pain) in 74% (20/27 cases), and rash (erythema) in 52% (14/27 cases). The onset of TSS often occurs approximately 8 days after delivery, with a minimum of the same day and a maximum of 28 days. Vaginal delivery accounted for 19 cases, cesarean section accounted for 7 cases, and one case was unknown. The causative organisms were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in 44% (12/27 cases) and MSSA in 48% (13/27 cases) of cases. No data were available for MSSA or MRSA in 2/27 patients (7%). The portal of entry was diverse, with 15/23 cases (65%) of endometritis and perineum, followed by 5/23 cases (22%) of mastitis and 3/23 cases (13%) of surgical site infection (SSI) after cesarean section. As for superantigens, TSST-1 was positive in 11/27 cases (41%), and enterotoxins B and C were positive in 1 case (4%) and 4 cases (15%), respectively. Complications of heart failure were observed in 2 cases, including ours. In our patient, heart failure preceded the onset of TSS, but in the other case, cardiomyopathy or heart failure was observed 9 days after the onset of TSS. The median duration of antimicrobial therapy was 12 days, and no fatalities were reported in any of the cases.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Flow diagram and search strategy for a systematic literature review

Full size image

Heart failure (HF) is a clinical syndrome caused by structural or functional cardiac abnormalities with symptoms or signs supported by objective evidence of elevated natriuretic peptide levels and pulmonary or systemic congestion [42]. In our literature review, we found several cases of respiratory insufficiency due to ARDS [24, 33], but there has been only one case of heart failure [20]. In this case, heart failure appeared approximately ten days after the onset of TSS. The development of congestive heart failure secondary to cardiomyopathy was suspected, which is different from our case, where our patient's initial presentation included acute heart failure and our case differs from the previously reported case in that the left ventricular systolic function was preserved. In any case, clinicians must keep in mind that patients with TSS can present solely with heart failure, which can be improved with appropriate therapeutic intervention.

Regarding TSS with cardiac complications, one report suggests that TSS is associated with reversible cardiomyopathy in rats, suggesting that TSST-1 may directly interfere with cardiac function [43]. In addition, heart failure as a cardiac complication of TSS has been reported in cases of tampon use; myocardial damage, ischemic changes, and multiple subendocardial microinfarcts associated with shock have been considered as possible mechanisms [44]. On the other hand, septic myocardial damage is called septic cardiomyopathy (SICM), reported as reversible myocardial damage by Parker et al. in 1984, but there is no current clear definition [45]. Sepsis is defined as a serious condition where infection causes severe organ damage [46], and SICM, as a sepsis-related manifestation, contributes to circulatory collapse, which, if not adequately treated, can lead to multiple organ dysfunction and increase the mortality rate by two to three-fold [47, 48]. Elevated blood troponin levels have been reported to be a poor prognostic factor in the setting of heart failure, as it is a marker of myocardial damage [49]. SCIM caused by TSS may be due to functional or structural changes in cardiomyocytes and myocardial microcirculatory disturbances caused by excessive cytokines [47, 48]. In our case, the NT-pro-BNP level was markedly elevated, accompanied by high troponin levels and pleural effusion, and physical examination showed edema of the legs and distended jugular veins, suggesting that such myocardial damage was caused by the toxin. In addition, a cardiac index of this case was 4.2 L/min/m2 and it was consistent with high output heart failure. Its causes include anemia, thyrotoxicosis, physiological changes (pregnancy, fever, infection, etc.), and congenital diseases [50], and, in our case, anemia, infection, and post-pregnancy status may have led to high output heart failure. Although the echocardiogram did not show any impairment of cardiac contractility, clinicians should consider the possibility that SCIM may be a possibility nonetheless. As for the other feasible diagnoses that would fit the clinical presentation, viral myocarditis was ruled out via blood tests, and perinatal cardiomyopathy was assumed to be a diagnosis of exclusion in the absence of any other cause of heart failure. In the present case, the left ventricular ejection fraction was preserved at approximately 60%, which is not consistent with peripartum cardiomyopathy, given that left ventricular systolic dysfunction was unremarkable [51,52,53].

It should be noted that hemodynamics during pregnancy and puerperium may be different from those of a normal state. During pregnancy, several physiological adaptations usually take place to satisfy the increased metabolic requirements of the mother and fetus and maintain placental perfusion; these changes revert back to a normal state about 2 weeks after delivery [54]. That is, after delivery, the increased cardiac output of pregnancy drops to 10%, and systemic vascular resistance also increases rapidly and returns to pre-pregnancy levels within 2 weeks [55, 56]. Therefore, in this case, the decrease in peripheral vascular resistance and increase in cardiac output detected by the Swan-Ganz catheter at 2 weeks post-pregnancy cannot be explained by the pregnancy itself.

Regarding the toxins in TSS, detecting superantigens such as TSST-1 has been beneficial [57] and was identified in approximately 40% of cases in this review. Non-menstrual staphylococcal TSS is not associated with all superantigens and is recognized in approximately 50% of cases [58, 59], similar to the one in this report. TSST-1 is known to be a superantigen essential for the pathogenesis of TSS. Superantigens may influence the pathogenesis of cardiovascular and vascular diseases associated with S. aureus infections [57]. Although other enterotoxins A, B, C, D, E, and H have been reported [60, 61], TSST-1 has a higher mucosal penetrating ability than enterotoxins B and C, and the amount of toxins produced by TSST-1 alone is thought to be much higher than that required to cause disease and may cause serious complications [57]. In our review, TSST-1 positivity was 20% (2/10 cases) for MSSA strains and 53% (8/15 cases) for MRSA strains; therefore, TSST-1 positivity tended to be higher in MRSA strains, which is consistent with previous reports [62,63,64]. Thus, toxin positivity may be higher in MRSA strains, but the direct relationship with prognosis is not clear, as all cases in our review successfully recovered. However, it is necessary to consider the limitation that not all case reports have reported toxin results.

In terms of treatment, it is essential to intervene as soon as possible and thoroughly search for the focus of the infection. In this case, although the superficial infection was minimal, we detected purulence on the inside of the perineal incision, and drainage was immediately performed. The tissue infection may be much more widespread than originally thought, and so, even if the local inflammatory findings are mild, it should be considered a potential source of infection [65]. Inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy may even increase mortality in intensive care patients with severe sepsis and septic shock [66, 67]. There are no randomized controlled studies suggesting antimicrobial selection for toxic shock syndrome, and evidence based on case series recommends initiating anti-staphylococcal treatment as empiric therapy [1, 68]. One guideline recommends that the initial antibiotic should include vancomycin, linezolid, daptomycin, telavancin, or ceftaroline for MRSA coverage if the institution has high proportion of MRSA infection or the patient is at high risk for bacterial resistance [69]. Additionally, they recommend the use of one of the following antibiotics if we consider Gram-negative and anaerobic bacteria; (1) piperacillin tazobactam, (2) carbapenem, or (3) ceftriaxone and metronidazole. Clindamycin is also recommended in toxic shock syndrome because limited in vitro data have shown that clindamycin in combination with standard therapy in TSS can be expected to inhibit the production of multiple exotoxins [70, 71]. Various studies have shown that clindamycin is a major protein synthesis inhibitor antibiotic active against S. aureus and reduces the production of bacterial toxins, and combination therapy, including standard treatment, is considered [72]. De-escalation to cloxacillin or nafcillin or cefazolin, and clindamycin is recommended after the causative organism is identified as MSSA [65]. At the present time, there is a lack of clinical studies on the appropriate duration of antimicrobial therapy for TSS due to S. aureus infection. This review shows that the median duration of therapy in all cases was approximately 12 days. This review also indicates that 5 of the 15 cases (33%) with MRSA strains were started on anti-MRSA therapy from the beginning, 9 cases (60%) needed to be changed to anti-MRSA therapy during treatment, and one case (7%) was infected with MRSA but completed treatment with non-anti-MRSA therapy. Although there have not been many reports of TSS due to postpartum MRSA, routine anti-MRSA therapy is not recommended [26]. The possibility of infections in pregnant women during hospitalization after delivery has been reported to be 0.11% [73], and it is essential to consider the risk factors for MRSA infection in each healthcare setting. Therefore, anti-MRSA therapy should be evaluated based on each patient’s risk factors or in cases where MRSA colonization has already been observed in the past [74]. Regarding prognosis, all cases included in our review had a surprisingly good prognosis, suggesting a trend toward a better prognosis compared with the mortality rate in non-menstrual related TSS, which is approximately 20% [75]. However, the number of cases is insufficient for general conclusions, and more cases are expected in the future.

TSS due to MSSA during the postpartum period is not common, but the diversity of symptoms requires appropriate diagnosis and early intervention because of the potential for increased mortality if the diagnosis is delayed. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review of non-menstrual related TSS due to S. aureus during the postpartum and the case report in which the initial presentation was pure heart failure. The strength of this review is that in addition to focusing on heart failure, a complication of TSS, it provides a clinical course and prognosis. This case report also offers new insights into the development of TSS under the guise of heart failure, which is essential for health care professionals who may generally be involved in TSS treatment. The multifaceted perspective provided by obstetrics and gynecology specialists, infectious diseases specialists, as well as cardiologists, from the beginning of hospitalization enabled early therapeutic intervention (appropriate antimicrobial agents, wound drainage, and control of heart failure). This case report teaches us that the clinical course of TSS can include a presentation of sole heart failure and suggests that the possibility of TSS should be kept in mind in cases presenting with heart failure during the postpartum phase.

Availability of data and materials

Detailed information about the case in this report is available from the hospital information system upon request. A search formula for systematic reviews was clearly indicated, and the literature search is available using this search formula. Our Excel file dataset extracted from this search is available from the Corresponding Author upon request.

Abbreviations

TSS:

Toxic shock syndrome

TSST-1:

Toxic shock syndrome toxin-1

MSSA:

Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus

TTE:

Transthoracic echocardiography

CT:

Computed tomography

STSS:

Streptococcal toxic shock syndrome

ARDS:

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

MRSA:

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

HF:

Heart failure

SICM:

Septic cardiomyopathy

References

  1. Davis JP, Chesney PJ, Wand PJ, LaVenture M. Toxic-shock syndrome: epidemiologic features, recurrence, risk factors, and prevention. N Engl J Med. 1980;303:1429–35. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198012183032501.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Todd J, Fishaut M, Kapral F, Welch T. Toxic-shock syndrome associated with phage-group-I Staphylococci. Lancet. 1978;2:1116–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(78)92274-2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Whitfield JW, Valenti WM, Magnussen CR. Toxic shock syndrome in the puerperium. JAMA. 1981;246:1806–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System. Toxic Shock Syndrome (Other Than Streptococcal) (TSS). https://ndc.services.cdc.gov/case-definitions/toxic-shock-syndrome-2011/ Accessed 10 Nov 2021.

  5. Wiesenthal AM, Ressman M, Caston SA, Todd JK. Toxic shock syndrome. I. Clinical exclusion of other syndromes by strict and screening definitions. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;122:847–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114167.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP, Byrd BF 3rd, Dokainish H, Edvardsen T, et al. Recommendations for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function by Echocardiography: An Update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016;29:277–314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Reduced incidence of menstrual toxic-shock syndrome--United States, 1980-1990 Centers for Disease Control (CDC). MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1990;39(25):421–3.

  8. Gaventa S, Reingold AL, Hightower AW, Broome CV, Schwartz B, Hoppe C, Harwell J, Lefkowitz LK, Makintubee S, Cundiff DR, et al. Active surveillance for toxic shock syndrome in the United States, 1986. Rev Infect Dis. 1989;11(Suppl 1):S28-34. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/11.supplement_1.s28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bartlett P, Reingold AL, Graham DR, Dan BB, Selinger DS, Tank GW, Wichterman KA. Toxic shock syndrome associated with surgical wound infections. JAMA. 1982;247:1448–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Morrison VA, Oldfield EC 3rd. Postoperative toxic shock syndrome. Arch Surg. 1983;118:791–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1983.01390070003001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tan LN, Mariappa G, Voon HY, Suharjono H. Septic miscarriage with toxic shock syndrome and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC): The role of surgery, recombinant activated factor VII and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Med J Malaysia. 2017;72:380–1.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Demey HE, Hautekeete ML, Buytaert P, Bossaert LL. Mastitis and toxic shock syndrome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1989;68:87–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016348909087698.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dann EJ, Weinberger M, Gillis S, Parsonnet J, Shapiro M, Moses AE. Bacterial laryngotracheitis associated with toxic shock syndrome in an adult. Clin Infect Dis. 1994;18:437–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/18.3.437.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ferguson MA, Todd JK. Toxic shock syndrome associated with Staphylococcus aureus sinusitis in children. J Infect Dis. 1990;161:953–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/161.5.953.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Paterson MP, Hoffman EB, Roux P. Severe disseminated staphylococcal disease associated with osteitis and septic arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72:94–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/161.5.953.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kotler DP, Sandkovsky U, Schlievert PM, Sordillo EM. Toxic shock-like syndrome associated with staphylococcal enterocolitis in an HIV-infected man. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:e121-123. https://doi.org/10.1086/518286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vuzevski VD, van Joost T, Wagenvoort JH, Dey JJ. Cutaneous pathology in toxic shock syndrome. Int J Dermatol. 1989;28:94–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4362.1989.tb01326.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Grimes J, Carpenter C, Reinker K. Toxic shock syndrome as a complication of orthopaedic surgery. J Pediatr Orthop. 1995;15:666–71. https://doi.org/10.1097/01241398-199509000-00023.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. DeVries AS, Lesher L, Schlievert PM, Rogers T, Villaume LG, Danila R, Lynfield R. Staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome 2000–2006: epidemiology, clinical features, and molecular characteristics. PLoS One. 2011;6:e22997. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022997.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sorrell TC, Packham DR, Helprin G, Munro R, Gibson JS. Staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1981;21:248–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828x.1981.tb00143.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Green SL, LaPeter KS. Evidence for postpartum toxic-shock syndrome in a mother-infant pair. Am J Med. 1982;72:169–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(82)90605-2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bracero L, Bowe E. Postpartum toxic shock syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;143:478–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(82)90093-x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cheek MG, Mashchak AC, Lau BH. Toxic shock syndrome in a postpartum patient. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;142:927–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(16)32544-3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Guerinot GT, Gitomer SD, Sanko SR. Postpartum patients with toxic shock syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 1982;59:43S-46S.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chow AW, Wittmann BK, Bartlett KH, Scheifele DW. Variant postpartum toxic shock syndrome with probable intrapartum transmission to the neonate. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;148:1074–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(84)90448-4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Katoh H, Ogihara T, Iyori S. Postpartum toxic shock syndrome: a report of a case. Jpn J Med. 1988;27:71–3. https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine1962.27.71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kadoya A, Iikuni Y, Hosaka S, Okada J, Kondo H. A SLE case with toxic shock syndrome after delivery. Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 1996;70:1279–83. https://doi.org/10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.70.1279.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. McAdoo GL, Monif GR. Expanding disease spectrum associated with puerperal mastitis. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1997;5:376–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/S1064744997000689.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kisaka Y, Hyodo M, Hayashi S, Nakagawa H, Kinutani M, Fujiwara H, Date K, Mizunoe T, Urabe T. A case of TSS (Toxic Shock Syndrome) caused by MRSA after delivery. Modern Trends Obstet Gynecol. 1997;46:69–74 [Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ohashi R, Suzuki Y, Doi T, Furukawa K. Three cases of postpartum MRSA infection. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;67:275–80 [Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fujiwara Y, Endo S. A case of Toxic Shock Syndrome (TSS) caused by MRSA thought to be caused by mastitis. J Japanese Assoc Infect Dis. 2001;75:898–903 [Japanese].

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Tanaka M, Sasaki Y, Hori K, Miyamoto T, Fukunishi H, Tanaka M. A case of probable toxic shock syndrome detected with MRSA at puerperal period. Skin Res. 2002;1:219–23 [Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  33. Andrews JI, Shamshirsaz AA, Diekema DJ. Nonmenstrual toxic shock syndrome due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:933–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181866468.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Collet C, Petsaris O, Lafforgue N, Poulain P, Gautier P, Michelet C, Donnio PY. Postpartum toxic shock syndrome due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus epidemic in community. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;144:184–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.02.040.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Saito N, Kato N, Abe Y, Watanabe E, Murata J, Shimizu H, Omoe K. Three cases of toxic shock syndrome. Japanese J Clin Dermatol. 2010;64:278–82 [Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ito Y, Morimoto K, Ogawa K, Fukumoto T, Kobayashi N, Asada H, Kasahara K, Onogi T. A case of toxic shock syndrome after vaginal delivery. Skin Res. 2011;10:417–23 [Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  37. Manabe K, Yamasaki O, Noda K, Katayama N, Tada K, Asagoe K. Cytokine profile and T cell receptor analysis in a case of postpartum toxic shock syndrome. J Dermatol. 2017;44:95–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.13446.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Deguchi Y, Horiuchi Y, Shojima K, Iwahashi N, Ikejima M, Ino K, Furukawa K. Postpartum Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Toxic Shock Syndrome Caused by a Perineal Infection. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2018;2018:2670179. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2670179.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Gokaraju S, Mutoro N, Feldman M. Mastitis-a rare cause of toxic shock syndrome. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32:S537. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2670179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Masuko S, Miyamoto T, Kaneko M, Ichihashi S, Nishino Y, Nishijima M. A case of toxic shock syndrome after cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;85:1129–33 [Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  41. Shibata T, Nakago S, Kato H, Tokuda H, Hosono S, Kotsuji F. Difficult maintenance of serum drug concentration in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus toxic shock syndrome during early puerperium. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2022;48:1484–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Bozkurt B, Coats AJ, Tsutsui H, Abdelhamid M, Adamopoulos S, Albert N, Anker SD, Atherton J, Böhm M, Butler J, et al. Universal Definition and Classification of Heart Failure: A Report of the Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, Japanese Heart Failure Society and Writing Committee of the Universal Definition of Heart Failure. J Card Fail. 2021;23:352–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.2115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Olson RD, Stevens DL, Melish ME. Direct effects of purified staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 on myocardial function of isolated rabbit atria. Rev Infect Dis. 1989;11(Suppl 1):S313-315. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/11.supplement_1.s313.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Burns JR, Menapace FJ. Acute reversible cardiomyopathy complicating toxic shock syndrome. Arch Intern Med. 1982;142:1032–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Parker MM, Shelhamer JH, Bacharach SL, Green MV, Natanson C, Frederick TM, Damske BA, Parrillo JE. Profound but reversible myocardial depression in patients with septic shock. Ann Intern Med. 1984;100:483–90. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-100-4-483.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Kakihana Y, Ito T, Nakahara M, Yamaguchi K, Yasuda T. Sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction: pathophysiology and management. J Intensive Care. 2016;4:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-016-0148-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Zanotti-Cavazzoni SL, Hollenberg SM. Cardiac dysfunction in severe sepsis and septic shock. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009;15:392–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283307a4e.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Fernando SM, Rochwerg B, Seely AJE. Clinical implications of the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). CMAJ. 2018;190:E1058-e1059. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.170149.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Mehta NJ, Khan IA, Gupta V, Jani K, Gowda RM, Smith PR. Cardiac troponin I predicts myocardial dysfunction and adverse outcome in septic shock. Int J Cardiol. 2004;95:13–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2003.02.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Reddy YNV, Melenovsky V, Redfield MM, Nishimura RA, Borlaug BA. High-output heart failure: a 15-year experience. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:473–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Bauersachs J, König T, van der Meer P, Petrie MC, Hilfiker-Kleiner D, Mbakwem A, Hamdan R, Jackson AM, Forsyth P, de Boer RA, et al. Pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of peripartum cardiomyopathy: a position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology Study Group on peripartum cardiomyopathy. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019;21:827–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.1493.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Isogai T, Kamiya CA. Worldwide incidence of peripartum cardiomyopathy and overall maternal mortality. Int Heart J. 2019;60:503–11. https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.18-729.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Sliwa K, Hilfiker-Kleiner D, Petrie MC, Mebazaa A, Pieske B, Buchmann E, Regitz-Zagrosek V, Schaufelberger M, Tavazzi L, van Veldhuisen DJ, et al. Current state of knowledge on aetiology, diagnosis, management, and therapy of peripartum cardiomyopathy: a position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on peripartum cardiomyopathy. Eur J Heart Fail. 2010;12:767–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjhf/hfq120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Yucel E, DeFaria YD. Pregnancy in women with congenital heart disease. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2017;19:73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-017-0572-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Robson SC, Hunter S, Moore M, Dunlop W. Haemodynamic changes during the puerperium: a Doppler and M-mode echocardiographic study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987;94:1028–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1987.tb02286.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Hunter S, Robson SC. Adaptation of the maternal heart in pregnancy. Br Heart J. 1992;68:540–3. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.68.12.540.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Spaulding AR, Salgado-Pabón W, Kohler PL, Horswill AR, Leung DY, Schlievert PM. Staphylococcal and streptococcal superantigen exotoxins. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013;26:422–47. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00104-12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Schlievert PM, Tripp TJ, Peterson ML. Reemergence of staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome in Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota, during the 2000–2003 surveillance period. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:2875–6. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.42.6.2875-2876.2004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Schlievert PM, Kim MH. Reporting of toxic shock syndrome Staphylococcus aureus in 1982 to 1990. J Infect Dis. 1991;164:1245–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/164.6.1245.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Garbe PL, Arko RJ, Reingold AL, Graves LM, Hayes PS, Hightower AW, Chandler FW, Broome CV. Staphylococcus aureus isolates from patients with nonmenstrual toxic shock syndrome. Evidence Additional Toxins Jama. 1985;253:2538–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Pinchuk IV, Beswick EJ, Reyes VE. Staphylococcal enterotoxins. Toxins (Basel). 2010;2:2177–97. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins2082177FreePMCarticle.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Kim JS, Kim HS, Song W, Cho HC, Lee KM, Kim EC. Molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates with toxic shock syndrome toxin and staphylococcal enterotoxin C genes. Korean J Lab Med. 2007;27:118–23. https://doi.org/10.3343/kjlm.2007.27.2.118.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Nagao M, Okamoto A, Yamada K, Hasegawa T, Hasegawa Y, Ohta M. Variations in amount of TSST-1 produced by clinical methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates and allelic variation in accessory gene regulator (agr) locus. BMC Microbiol. 2009;9:52. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-9-52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Robert J, Tristan A, Cavalié L, Decousser JW, Bes M, Etienne J, Laurent F. Panton-valentine leukocidin-positive and toxic shock syndrome toxin 1-positive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a French multicenter prospective study in 2008. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:1734–9. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01221-10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Lappin E, Ferguson AJ. Gram-positive toxic shock syndromes. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009;9:281–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70066-0.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. MacArthur RD, Miller M, Albertson T, Panacek E, Johnson D, Teoh L, Barchuk W. Adequacy of early empiric antibiotic treatment and survival in severe sepsis: experience from the MONARCS trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38:284–8. https://doi.org/10.1086/379825.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Garnacho-Montero J, Ortiz-Leyba C, Herrera-Melero I, Aldabó-Pallás T, Cayuela-Dominguez A, Marquez-Vacaro JA, Carbajal-Guerrero J, Garcia-Garmendia JL. Mortality and morbidity attributable to inadequate empirical antimicrobial therapy in patients admitted to the ICU with sepsis: a matched cohort study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008;61:436–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkm460.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Davis JP, Osterholm MT, Helms CM, Vergeront JM, Wintermeyer LA, Forfang JC, et al. Tri-state toxic-shock syndrome study. II. Clinical and laboratory findings. J Infect Dis. 1982;145:441–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Stevens DL, Bisno AL, Chambers HF, Dellinger EP, Goldstein EJC, Gorbach SL, et al. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:147–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Stevens DL, Ma Y, Salmi DB, McIndoo E, Wallace RJ, Bryant AE. Impact of antibiotics on expression of virulence-associated exotoxin genes in methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dis. 2007;195:202–11. https://doi.org/10.1086/510396.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Schlievert PM, Kelly JA. Clindamycin-induced suppression of toxic-shock syndrome–associated exotoxin production. J Infect Dis. 1984;149:471. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/149.3.471.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Campbell AJ, Dotel R, Blyth CC, Davis JS, Tong SYC, Bowen AC. Adjunctive protein synthesis inhibitor antibiotics for toxin suppression in Staphylococcus aureus infections: a systematic appraisal. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019;74:1–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Holm MKA, Winther TN, Kammann S, Rasmusson MS, Brooks L, Westh H, Bartels MD. Prevalence of MRSA nasal carriage among pregnant women in Copenhagen. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0246343. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246343.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Berger S, Kunerl A, Wasmuth S, Tierno P, Wagner K, Brügger J. Menstrual toxic shock syndrome: case report and systematic review of the literature. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19:e313–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30041-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Descloux E, Perpoint T, Ferry T, Lina G, Bes M, Vandenesch F, Mohammedi I, Etienne J. One in five mortality in non-menstrual toxic shock syndrome versus no mortality in menstrual cases in a balanced French series of 55 cases. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008;27:37–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-007-0405-2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None

Authorship statement

All authors meet the ICMJE authorship criteria.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, St. Luke’s International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

    Takahiro Suzuki, Yasufumi Kijima & Nobuyuki Komiyama

  2. Department of Infectious Diseases, St. Luke’s International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

    Takahiro Matsuo, Ryo Hasegawa, Kazuhiro Ishikawa & Nobuyoshi Mori

  3. Department of Integrated Women’s Health, St. Luke’s International Hospital, 9-1 Akashicho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan

    Michiko Yamanaka

  4. St. Luke’s International University Library, Tokyo, Japan

    Fujimi Kawai

Authors
  1. Takahiro Suzuki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Takahiro Matsuo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yasufumi Kijima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ryo Hasegawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kazuhiro Ishikawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Michiko Yamanaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Fujimi Kawai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Nobuyuki Komiyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Nobuyoshi Mori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

T.S. wrote the manuscript draft. T.M. and N.M. supervised the study and edited the manuscript. Y.K., R.H., and M.Y. were the attending physicians for this patient. F.K., R.H., and K.I. participated in the literature review. All authors reviewed the final manuscript and approved its contents.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takahiro Suzuki.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Written consent was obtained from the patient.

Consent for publication

Written consent to publish both the case and the photos was obtained from the patient. Informed consent regarding publication was obtained in writing from the patient after explanation to the patient and patient's family.

Competing interests

The authors have no financial disclosures or conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1. The echocardiographic four-chamber image on admission. The echocardiographic four-chamber image is shown in Video 1. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed unremarkable left ventricular size and wall thickness with a normal ejection fraction. It corresponds to having intermediate left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.

Additional file 2. The echocardiographic image of the inferior vena cava on admission. The dilated inferior vena cava (IVC) is shown in Video 2. The IVC was dilated to 21.7/18.4 mm (dilation on inspiration and expiration), indicating decreased respiratory variability.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suzuki, T., Matsuo, T., Kijima, Y. et al. Acute heart failure associated with toxic shock syndrome due to methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus during the postpartum period: case report and systematic literature review. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 22, 452 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02903-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02903-3

Keywords

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2261

Contact us