Skip to main content
Download PDF

Association of blood lipids with coronary artery plaque among Saudi patients referred to computed tomography

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders volume 22, Article number: 249 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Blood lipids are strong risk factors for the progression of atherosclerotic plaques. However, data on gender-specific associations are limited.

Objectives

To examine gender-specific associations of coronary plaque with blood lipids among a large sample of Saudi patients without CAD.

Methods

Retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted among adult patients referred to (64 multidetector spiral) computed tomography (CT) for standard indications at the Prince Sultan Cardiac Centre (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) between July 2007 and December 2017. Those with pre-existing CAD were excluded. Plaques were determined based on quantification of coronary calcium and Coronary CT angiography.

Results

A total 2421 patients (1498 males and 923 females) were included. The prevalence of any plaque was 36.6% with higher burden in males than females (41.3% versus 28.9%, p < 0.001). Approximately 78.9% of all plaques were calcified. Blood lipids (mmol/L) were 4.75 ± 1.14 for total cholesterol, 2.90 ± 0.96 for LDL cholesterol, 1.20 ± 0.36 for HDL cholesterol, and 1.64 ± 1.09 for triglycerides. Males had significantly higher triglycerides and lower HDL cholesterol compared with females. In adjusted models in males and all patients, soft and/or calcified plaques were significantly associated with lower HDL cholesterol and higher triglycerides. In females, the only significant association was between soft plaques and higher triglycerides.

Conclusions

Middle-aged patients without clinical CAD in Saudi Arabia have a high burden of plaques, specially calcified ones. The findings may impact the use of lipid lowering mediations, by underscoring the importance of assessing the risk of CAD in patients without clinical CAD even in case of lack of coronary calcification.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by build‑up of fatty plaques in the walls of arteries, eventually leading to their narrowing [1]. Rupture of coronary atherosclerotic plaque can lead to thrombosis with subsequent coronary artery disease (CAD) events and mortality [2, 3]. Globally, CAD is the leading cause of death in all countries, irrespective of their income groups [4]. Similarly, in Saudi Arabia, CAD is the leading cause of deaths with approximately 114 deaths per 100,1000 population annually [5]. This represents approximately 17% of all hospital deaths [6]. Additionally, cardiovascular disease is the major cause of disability among Saudi adults as measured by disability-adjusted life-years [7].

Hyperlipidemia particularly high levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol is one of the leading risk factors of CAD and stroke [8, 9]. Over the last decades, the prevalence and burden of hyperlipidemia is increasing, specially in developing countries, due to widespread adoption of unhealthy lifestyle and increased prevalence of diabetes and obesity [10, 11]. The pattern in Middle Eastern countries is peculiar and largely manifested as low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and high levels of triglycerides [9, 10]. On the other hand, the use of statins specially in developed countries significantly reduced the average plasma cholesterol levels and hyperlipidemia-associated mortality [9, 12].

The prevalence of hyperlipidemia in Saudi Arabia has been estimated between 20 and 50% in the general population [13,14,15]. However, gender-specific levels of blood lipids among patients suspected of atherosclerosis but without history of CAD has not been comprehensively examined. Additionally, the data on the prevalence of plaques and their association with blood lipids are limited [16]. The objective of the current study was to examine gender-specific associations of blood lipids with coronary plaque among in a large sample of Saudi patients without clinical CAD.

Methods

Setting

The current study was conducted at Prince Sultan Cardiac Center (PSCC). The PSCC is 200-bed specialized cardiac center located in Riyadh that provides a major portion of the diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac services in Saudi Arabia. The PSCC has several departments including adult and pediatric cardiology, adult and pediatric cardiac surgery, cardiac anaesthesia, and advanced imaging. The current study was done at the advanced imaging unit under adult cardiology.

Design

It was a retrospective cohort study conducted between July 2007 and December 2017. The study design obtained all required ethical approvals from the ethical committee of PSCC.

Population

The study targeted adult patients (age > 18 years) referred to (64 multidetector spiral) computed tomographic (CT) for standard indications. Those with pre-existing CAD were excluded from the study. Pre-existing CAD was defined as myocardial infarction, angioplasty, stent placement, and coronary artery bypass grafting. Additionally, CT done for aortic assessment, for pericardial assessment and low-quality CT with artifacts were excluded from the study. Finally, those who were missing blood lipid (N = 441) or plaque (n = 20) testing results were excluded, leaving 2421 for analysis. The number of patients is sufficient to detect a gender-specific difference in total cholesterol of 0.15 mmol/L with more than 90% power.

CT scanning protocol

Patients were scanned during a single breath-hold using a 64 (multidetector spiral) CT scanner (Philips Brilliance). A retrospective gating protocol with thickness of 0.5 to 2.5, FOV 220, and the average radiation dose is 6–9 mSv. The scanning protocol was designed to minimize the radiation dose based on BMI. Indications of coronary CT included chest pain in patients with intermediate risk of CAD, impaired left ventricular function in asymptomatic patient, before non-coronary cardiac surgery in patients with intermediate risk of CAD, to rule out coronary anomaly, and in case of arrhythmia with atypical chest pain.

Definitions

Plaques were determined based on quantification of coronary calcium and coronary CT angiography. Classification of plaques as calcified or soft (non-calcified) was based on the presence or lack of coronary calcification (respectively). The later was expressed using Agatston score, which reflects the total area of calcium deposits and the density of the calcium in the entire coronary tree. Therefore, those with coronary stenosis on coronary CT angiography and had above zero coronary calcium score were classified as calcified plaque (Fig. 1A) while those with coronary stenosis on coronary CT angiography and had zero coronary calcium score were classified as soft plaque (Fig. 1B). Patients were classified as no plaques, soft plaques, and calcified plaques. Blood lipids results at the time of the computed tomography were used. The levels defining controlled blood lipids (in mmol/L) were < 5.17 for total cholesterol, ≥ 1.0 for males and ≥ 1.3 in females for HDL cholesterol, and < 1.7 for triglycerides. The levels defining control of LDL cholesterol (in mmol/L) was < 3 in mild SCORE risk, < 2.6 in moderate SCORE risk, < 1.8 in high SCORE risk, and < 1.4 in very high SCORE risk.

Fig. 1
figure 1

A patient with clacified plaque (A). Coronary CT angiography showed proximal LAD calcified lesion in a patient with total coronary calcium score 86 HU. A patient with soft (non-calcified) plaque (B). Coronary CT angiography showed proximal LAD non-cacified lesion in a patient with total coronary calcium score zero

Full size image

Risk stratification

Stratification of the risk of CAD among patients was done using the number of risk factors and the systematic coronary risk evaluation (SCORE) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Risk factors for CAD were defined as history of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, smoking, family history of premature CAD (before the age of 65 years), and obesity (BMI > 30). The SCORE estimating the 10-year risk of developing fatal cardiovascular disease in populations with high cardiovascular disease risk was calculated according to standard methodology [17].

Data collection tool

Study data collection sheet was initiated for patients who underwent coronary CT and meeting the study eligibility criteria. Clinical information including medical history, traditional risk factors, and cardiac comorbidity were then abstracted from the electronic patient chart system.

Statistical analysis

Demographic characteristics, risk stratification, and blood lipids were compared by the plaque and gender groups. Chi-square or Fisher exact tests (as appropriate) were used to detect differences in categorical variables. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Kruskal–Wallis test (as appropriate) were used to detect plaque differences in continuous variables while t-test or Mann–Whitney test (as appropriate) were used to detect gender differences in continuous variables. In case of plaque groups, pairwise differences were calculated using Bonferroni adjustment method for multiple comparisons. Generalized linear regression models was used to detect differences in log-transformed blood lipid levels between plaque and gender groups after adjusting for other CAD risk factors. Log data were transformed back to normal before presentation in Table 4. Plaque-gender interaction terms were included in the models that were not split by gender to test for the significance of interaction between plaque and gender. All P-values were two-tailed. P-value < 0.05 was considered as significant. SPSS software (release 25.0, Armonk, NY: IBM Corp) was used for all statistical analyses.

Results

A total 2421 patients (1498 males and 923 females) were included in the current analysis. As shown in Fig. 2, the prevalence of any plaque was 36.6% and was higher in males than females (41.3% versus 28.9%, p < 0.001). Approximately 78.9% of all plaques were calcified. The prevalence of calcified plaques was 28.9% and was higher in males than females (33.0% versus 22.1%, p < 0.001). The prevalence of soft plaques was 7.7% and was higher in males than females (8.3% versus 6.8%, p = 0.018).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Frequency of coronary plaque by gender

Full size image

Table 1 shows the demographic and clinical characteristics by plaque status. The majority (61.9%) were males. The average age was 50.3 ± 11.5 years and the average body mass index (BMI) was 30.2 ± 5.6. The average systolic blood pressure was 129.2 ± 20.3 mmHg. The most common CAD risk factors included obesity (45.9%), hypertension (39.2%), diabetes (28.6%), hyperlipidemia (17.1%), current smoking (12.3%), and family history of premature cad (8.1%). According to the SCORE, 10-year risk of developing fatal cardiovascular disease was mild (< 1% risk) in 23.0% of the patients, moderate (1 to < 5% risk) in 62.8%, high (5 to < 10% risk) in 11.5%, and very high (≥ 10% risk) in 2.7%. Adding diabetes to the SCORE increased the percentages of high and very high risk to 35.7% and 6.9%, respectively. Calcified and/or soft plaques were significantly associated with older age, male gender, obesity, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, current smoking, renal impairment, higher SCORE, and higher levels of fasting blood glucose, hemoglobin A1c, and serum creatinine.

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients by coronary plaque groups
Full size table

Table 2 shows the crude means and standard deviations of blood lipids by plaque and gender groups. Overall, the levels of blood lipids (mmol/L) were 4.75 ± 1.14 for total cholesterol, 2.90 ± 0.96 for LDL cholesterol, 1.20 ± 0.36 for HDL cholesterol, and 1.64 ± 1.09 for triglycerides. Plaques were significantly associated with all blood lipids. Soft and calcified plaques were significantly associated with higher triglycerides and lower HDL cholesterol, with worse profile in soft than calcified plaques. Additionally, calcified plaques were significantly associated with lower total and LDL cholesterol. Males had significantly higher triglycerides and lower HDL cholesterol compared with females. In males only, the associations between plaques and blood lipids were almost identical to overall associations, with the exception of the association between calcified plaques and higher triglycerides that did not reach statistical significance. In females only, soft plaques were significantly associated with lower HDL cholesterol while calcified plaques were significantly associated with higher triglycerides.

Table 2 Crude means and standard deviations of blood lipids (mmol/L) by coronary plaque and gender groups
Full size table

Table 3 shows the control of blood lipids by plaque and gender groups. The control of blood lipids was 66.9% for total cholesterol, 66.9% for triglycerides, 59.3% for HDL cholesterol, and 29.2% for LDL cholesterol. Males had significantly better control of HDL cholesterol but worse control of LDL cholesterol and triglycerides compared with females. Soft and calcified plaques were significantly associated with lower control of HDL cholesterol in males and all patients. Soft plaques were significantly associated with lower control of triglycerides in all patients only. Calcified plaques were significantly associated with higher control of total cholesterol in males only. Soft and calcified plaques were not significantly associated with control of blood lipids in females.

Table 3 Control of blood lipids by coronary plaque and gender groups
Full size table

Table 4 shows adjusted means and standard errors of blood lipids by plaque and gender groups. Generalized linear regression models adjusted for other potential plaque risk factors (listed in Table 4 notes) showed that males had significantly higher triglycerides and lower HDL/total cholesterol compared with females. In males and all patients, soft and/or calcified plaques were significantly associated with lower HDL cholesterol and higher triglycerides. In females, the only significant association was between soft plaques and higher triglycerides. Plaque-gender interactions were significant in HDL cholesterol and triglycerides models and marginally significant in total cholesterol model.

Table 4 Adjusted* means and standard errors of blood lipids (mmol/L) by coronary plaque and gender groups
Full size table

Discussion

The current study reported gender-specific prevalence of plaques, levels of blood lipids, and their associations among patients without history of CAD in Saudi Arabia. Approximately 37% of the patients in the current study had plaques, with 79% of them had calcified plaques. The current finding confirms the high burden subclinical atherosclerosis among middle-aged patients without clinical CAD [18]. Additionally, it reconfirm the role of coronary CT-angiography as an important screening tool for subclinical atherosclerosis even in case of lack of coronary calcification [3]. As expected, the current data showed higher risk of plaques specially calcified ones in males compared with females [19]. The prevalence of plaques in the current study was probably lower than reported in several international studies [20,21,22,23]. However, the plaques had probably higher percentage of calcification, indicating advanced progression of atherosclerosis in this relatively young age groups [20,21,22,23]. For example, plaques in previous studies were reported in 60% of patients without CAD with mixed levels of CAD risk [21, 22] and 20% in patients without CAD with low CAD risk [23]. In these studies, non-calcified plaques represented between 50 and 75% of all plaques [20,21,22,23]. Comparing the current findings with local studies is challenging due to limited data and different methodology. Nevertheless, soft plaques in Saudi Arabia were found in 6.4% of symptomatic patients with a high clinical suspicion of CAD but without coronary calcification [16].

The levels of blood lipids in the current study were slightly different from global levels [9]. For example, total cholesterol levels were slightly higher than global levels (4.73 versus 4.66 in males and 4.79 vs. 4.75 in females) while HDL cholesterol levels were very similar to the global levels (1.12 vs. 1.12 in males and 1.32 vs. 1.29 in females) [9]. On the other hand, the frequency of hyperlipidemia in the current study was very similar to those reported in the Middle Eastern and Gulf countries (33.1% vs. 32.7% to 36.8%) [10, 11]. Males in the current study had higher triglycerides and lower HDL cholesterol compared with females. This was observed in previous reports in Saudi Arabia, using both national population data [13, 14] and outpatient clinic data [24]. Adjustment for traditional CAD risk factors in the current study attenuated the values of all blood lipids but did not change the gender-specific differences in triglycerides and HDL cholesterol. Males in the current study had better control of HDL cholesterol but worse control of triglycerides compared with females. Interestingly, recent guidelines recommend the use of lipid lowering medications in both males and females according to the patients' risk of CAD, rather than treating to specific lipid levels [25, 26].

Similar to previous studies, coronary plaques in the current study were associated with traditional risk factors of CAD including the SCORE [21, 27, 28]. While the patients in the current study had no history of clinical CAD, they had mixed risk of CAD, which was largely of mild/intermediate degree. The associations between plaques and blood lipids in the current study were stronger in males than females in both univariate and multivariate analysis. For example, males who had lower HDL cholesterol and higher triglycerides than females had stronger independent associations between soft and/or calcified plaques and lower HDL cholesterol and higher triglycerides. The gender-specific differences in the associations of coronary plaque with blood lipids may be related to the sex-hormone associated delayed atherosclerotic pathology including lipid accumulation [29, 30]. HDL cholesterol has been shown to inhibit the progression of atherosclerotic plaques by moving cholesterol from macrophages in the arterial wall of the arteries to the liver [31]. Higher triglycerides and lower HDL cholesterol were recognized as atherogenic index, which is associated with progression of atherosclerotic plaques [32]. Additionally, it is associated with other conditions that promote atherosclerosis such as insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome [32]. It should be noted that most of circulating triglycerides are carried on triglycerides-rich very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL). The later are directly involved in fatty deposition on the arterial wall [33].

The current study is considered the first study in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf region to examine gender-specific associations of plaques and blood lipids. The study examined a large number of patients seen over 10 years in a large referral center. This allowed gender specific presentation of data. Both univariate and multivariate analysis was used to detect independent associations. Nevertheless, few limitations are acknowledged. The cross-sectional design can determine association but not causation. Being a single center experience without follow up data about clinical CAD may limit the generalizability of the findings. However, it should be fine for a similar population without evidence of clinical CAD. As the patients were first seen at the CT, there was lack of information about the use of and adherence with lipid lowering medications. Patient rather than segmental plaque assessment may have overestimated calcified plaques. However, we believe that these limitations have minor impact on the study finding (if any).

In conclusion, middle-aged patients without clinical CAD in Saudi Arabia have a high burden of plaques, specially calcified ones. Plaque-gender interactions were detected in HDL cholesterol and triglycerides. Males who had higher burden of plaques had higher triglycerides and lower HDL cholesterol compared with females. Plaques were associated with lower HDL cholesterol and higher triglycerides, with stronger associations in males than females in both univariate and multivariate analysis. The current findings may impact the use of lipid lowering mediations, by underscoring the importance of assessing the risk of CAD in patients without clinical CAD even in case of lack of coronary calcification.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available as per the Ministry of defense and local guidelines of Prince Sultan Cardiac Centre but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request; Dr Sumaya Al Helali (sumaya_harbi@yahoo.com, 00966530787548).

References

  1. Aziz M, Yadav K. Pathogenesis of atherosclerosis a review. Med Clin Rev. 2016;2(3):1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ambrose JA, Singh M. Pathophysiology of coronary artery disease leading to acute coronary syndromes. F1000Prime Rep 2015, 7:08–08.

  3. Plank F, Friedrich G, Dichtl W, Klauser A, Jaschke W, Franz WM, Feuchtner G. The diagnostic and prognostic value of coronary CT angiography in asymptomatic high-risk patients: a cohort study. Open Heart. 2014;1(1): e000096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nowbar AN, Gitto M, Howard JP, Francis DP, Al-Lamee R. Mortality from ischemic heart disease. Circulation: Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes 2019;12(6):e005375.

  5. World Health Organization: Global Health Estimates: Life expectancy and leading causes of death and disability. Cause-specific mortality, 2000–2019. https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/mortality-and-global-health-estimates/ghe-leading-causes-of-death. Last accessed May 30, 2021; 2020.

  6. Saudi Ministry of Health (MOH): Annual Statistical Book. 1438 H 2017 G. https://www.moh.gov.sa/en/Ministry/Statistics/book/Documents/ANNUAL-STATISTICAL-BOOK-1438H.pdf. Last accessed May 30, 2021; 2017.

  7. Tyrovolas S, El Bcheraoui C, Alghnam SA, Alhabib KF, Almadi MAH, Al-Raddadi RM, Bedi N, El Tantawi M, Krish VS, Memish ZA, et al. The burden of disease in Saudi Arabia 1990–2017: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Planetary Health. 2020;4(5):e195–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Alloubani A, Nimer R, Samara R: Relationship between hyperlipidemia, cardiovascular disease and stroke: a systematic review. Curr Cardiol Rev 2020.

  9. Pirillo A, Casula M, Olmastroni E, Norata GD, Catapano AL. Global epidemiology of dyslipidaemias. Nat Rev Cardiol 2021.

  10. Al Rasadi K, Almahmeed W, AlHabib KF, Abifadel M, Farhan HA, AlSifri S, Jambart S, Zubaid M, Awan Z, Al-Waili K, et al. Dyslipidaemia in the Middle East: current status and a call for action. Atherosclerosis. 2016;252:182–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nouh F, Omar M, Younis M. Risk factors and management of hyperlipidemia (review). Asian J Cardiol Res. 2018;2(1):1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vancheri F, Backlund L, Strender L-E, Godman B, Wettermark B. Time trends in statin utilisation and coronary mortality in Western European countries. BMJ Open. 2016;6(3): e010500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Alkaabba A, Al-Hamdan N, Tahir A, Abdalla A, Hussein G, Saeed A, Hamza MA. Prevalence and correlates of dyslipidemia among adults in Saudi Arabia: results from a National Survey. Open J Endocrine Metabolic Dis. 2012; 2:89.

  14. Al-Nozha MM, Arafah MR, Al-Maatouq MA, Khalil MZ, Khan NB, Al-Marzouki K, Al-Mazrou YY, Abdullah M, Al-Khadra A, Al-Harthi SS. Hyperlipidemia in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2008;29(2):282.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Alzahrani G, Aljehani S, Al-Johani J. Risk factors of dyslipidemia among saudi population, 2017. Egypt J Hosp Med. 2018;71(1):2262–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Al-Muhaidb SM, Aljebreen AMM, AlZamel ZA, Fathala A. Prevalence of noncalcified plaques and coronary artery stenosis in patients with coronary calcium scores of zero. Coronary artery disease 2020.

  17. Conroy R. Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project. Eur Heart J. 2003;24(11):987–1003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gatto L, Prati F. Subclinical atherosclerosis: how and when to treat it? Eur Heart J Suppl 2020; 22(Supplement_E):E87–E90.

  19. Plank F, Beyer C, Friedrich G, Wildauer M, Feuchtner G. Sex differences in coronary artery plaque composition detected by coronary computed tomography: quantitative and qualitative analysis. Neth Heart J. 2019;27(5):272–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rodriguez K, Kwan AC, Lai S, Lima JA, Vigneault D, Sandfort V, Pattanayak P, Ahlman MA, Mallek M, Sibley CT, et al. Coronary plaque burden at coronary CT angiography in asymptomatic men and women. Radiology. 2015;277(1):73–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li M, Sun G, Ding J, Li L, Peng ZH, Jiang XS. Risk factors for non-calcified plaques in asymptomatic population. Acad Radiol. 2012;19(5):548–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tota-Maharaj R, Al-Mallah MH, Nasir K, Qureshi WT, Blumenthal RS, Blaha MJ. Improving the relationship between coronary artery calcium score and coronary plaque burden: addition of regional measures of coronary artery calcium distribution. Atherosclerosis. 2015;238(1):126–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Park GM, Cho YR, Won KB, Yang YJ, Park S, Ann SH, Kim YG, Park EJ, Kim SJ, Lee SG, et al. Triglyceride glucose index is a useful marker for predicting subclinical coronary artery disease in the absence of traditional risk factors. Lipids Health Dis. 2020;19(1):7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Al-Hassan Y, Fabella E, Estrella E, Aatif M. Prevalence and determinants of dyslipidemia: data from a Saudi University Clinic. Open Public Health J. 2018;11:416–24.

  25. Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, Beam C, Birtcher KK, Blumenthal RS, Braun LT, de Ferranti S, Faiella-Tommasino J, Forman DE, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: a Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(24):e285–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, Koskinas KC, Casula M, Badimon L, Chapman MJ, De Backer GG, Delgado V, Ference BA, et al. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(1):111–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu H, Liu J, Huang W, Zhao H, Zhao N, Wang H. Association between multi-site atherosclerotic plaques and systemic arteriosclerosis: results from the BEST study (Beijing Vascular Disease Patients Evaluation Study). Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2020;18(1):30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Toth PP. Subclinical atherosclerosis: what it is, what it means and what we can do about it. Int J Clin Pract. 2008;62(8):1246–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Fairweather D. Sex differences in inflammation during atherosclerosis. Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2015;8(Suppl 3):49–59.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Pérez-López FR, Larrad-Mur L, Kallen A, Chedraui P, Taylor HS. Gender differences in cardiovascular disease: hormonal and biochemical influences. Reprod Sci. 2010;17(6):511–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Adorni MP, Ronda N, Bernini F, Zimetti F. High density lipoprotein cholesterol efflux capacity and atherosclerosis in cardiovascular disease: pathophysiological aspects and pharmacological perspectives. Cells 2021; 10(3).

  32. Azarpazhooh MR, Najafi F, Darbandi M, Kiarasi S, Oduyemi T, Spence JD. Triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio: a clue to metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, and severe atherosclerosis. Lipids; 2021.

  33. Nordestgaard BG. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: new insights from epidemiology, genetics, and biology. Circ Res. 2016;118(4):547–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks for all staff at adult cardiology, Prince Sultan Cardiac Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The material included in this manuscript is original and it has been neither published elsewhere nor submitted for publication simultaneously. All authors of the manuscript have read and agreed to its content and are accountable for all aspects of the accuracy and integrity of the manuscript in accordance with ICMJE criteria.

Funding

The current research received no financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Adult Cardiology Department, Prince Sultan Cardiac Centre, Riyadh, 12233, Saudi Arabia

    Sumaya Al Helali, Muhammad Abid Hanif, Ahmad Al Majed, Nura Alshugair, Abdullah Belfageih, Hamad Al Qahtani & Sameer Al Dulikan

Authors
  1. Sumaya Al Helali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Muhammad Abid Hanif
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ahmad Al Majed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nura Alshugair
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Abdullah Belfageih
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hamad Al Qahtani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sameer Al Dulikan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors have fulfilled the standard criteria for authorship. Sumaya Al Helali, idea and writing the first draft. the manuscript; Muhammad Abid Hanif, idea and critical review of the manuscript; Ahmad AlMajed and Nura Alshugair, collection of CT data and patients’ information, interpretation of finding, and critical review of final version; Abdullah Belfageih, Hamad Al Qahtani, and Sameer Al Dulikan, collection of laboratory data, interpretation of finding, and critical review of final version. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sumaya Al Helali.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study has been approved by the Research and Ethics Committee at Prince Sultan Cardiac Center on 28th July 2020 with approval number R20025. Informed consent of individual patients was waived by the Research and Ethics Committee at Prince Sultan Cardiac Center due to the retrospective nature of the study and the study data represent the routine daily management of patients. The study protocol and all methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors had no known competing financial interest or personal relationship that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. No tables or Figures are taken from other study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al Helali, S., Abid Hanif, M., Al Majed, A. et al. Association of blood lipids with coronary artery plaque among Saudi patients referred to computed tomography. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 22, 249 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02690-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02690-x

Keywords

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2261

Contact us