Skip to main content

Evaluation of the right atrial phasic functions in patients with anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography study

Abstract

Background

Evidence suggests that changes in left ventricular systolic and diastolic functions may affect right atrial (RA) phasic functions. We aimed to evaluate RA phasic functions in the presence of anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (ASTEMI) as an acute event and to compare the findings with those in a control group.

Methods

We recruited 92 consecutive ASTEMI patients without accompanying significant stenosis in the proximal and middle parts of the right coronary artery and 31 control subjects, matched for age, sex, diabetes, and hypertension. RA phasic functions were evaluated concerning their longitudinal 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography-derived markers. The ASTEMI group was followed up for all-cause mortality or reinfarction.

Results

In the ASTEMI group, RA strain was reduced during the reservoir (33.2% ± 4.3% vs 30.5% ± 8.1%; P = 0.021) and conduit (16% [12–18%] vs 14% [9–17%]; P = 0.048) phases. The other longitudinal 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography-derived markers of RA phasic functions were not different between the 2 groups. RA strain and strain rate during the contraction phase were predictive of all-cause mortality or reinfarction (hazard ratio = 0.80; P = 0.024 and hazard ratio = 0.39; P = 0.026, respectively).

Conclusions

Based on 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography, in the ASTEMI group, compared with the control group, RA reservoir and conduit functions were reduced, while RA contraction function was preserved. RA contraction function was predictive of all-cause mortality or reinfarction during the follow-up period.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The right atrium (RA) is the first cardiac chamber to receive blood from the peripheral arteries. The phasic functions of the RA modulate the function of the right ventricle (RV) through the storage of blood in the ventricular systole (RA reservoir function), the conveyance of blood to the ventricle during the early diastole (RA conduit function), and the delivery of the blood left in the RA by late diastolic contractions (RA contraction function) [1]. Consequently, in the long term, RA phasic functions may affect left ventricular (LV) function and cardiac output. On the other hand, the diastolic impairment of the LV can result in the diastolic impairment of the RV [2]. Additionally, RA pressure is correlated with LV diastolic pressure [3]. Hence, in the presence of LV diastolic dysfunction, the RA is exposed to increased RV diastolic pressure, which may affect RA phasic functions [4]. It is reasonable that in the backward route, acute changes in LV function induced by myocardial infarction (MI) may affect RA phasic functions. The phasic functions of the RA are independently associated with major adverse cardiac events in patients with acute MI [5]. RA phasic functions are impaired in the presence of inferior MI and RVMI compared with the presence of inferior MI in the absence of RVMI; nonetheless, the effects of anterior LVMI have yet to be clarified [6, 7].

In the recent decade, 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography (2DSTE) has been used by researchers to assess RA phasic functions extensively. Indeed, 2DSTE has become one of the main methods to evaluate RA phasic functions, with investigators having reached a consensus regarding how to measure RA phasic functions in terms of deformation markers [8, 9]. This method is capable of demonstrating the effects of hypertension, diabetes, autoimmune diseases, and RVMI on the phasic functions of the RA [6, 10,11,12]. Further, longitudinal 2DSTE-derived deformation indices are associated with RA-related hemodynamic measurements [13]. Other advantages of 2DSTE are its reproducibility and feasibility in the evaluation of RA phasic functions [14, 15]. In addition, longitudinal 2DSTE-derived deformation markers are correlated with cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking-derived deformation markers [16].

The RA works in interaction with the RV, and its phasic functions are to some extent but not completely dependent on RV function as is the case in the relationship between left atrial (LA) function and LV function [17, 18]. All cardiac chambers are interconnected, and structural or hemodynamic changes in 1 chamber may impact the other chambers such as the effects of LV remodeling on RA phasic functions [6, 19].

In this study, hypothesizing that anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (ASTEMI) could affect RA phasic functions, we aimed to evaluate the phasic functions of the RA as assessed by 2DSTE in the presence of ASTEMI (the culprit lesion in the left anterior descending artery) and to compare the findings with those in a control group.

Methods

Study population

Between September 2019 and February 2021, we recruited patients with ASTEMI who had undergone successful primary percutaneous coronary interventions and were in the sinus rhythm. The fourth universal definition of MI was considered for the diagnosis of ASTEMI [20]. The exclusion criteria were composed of a history of atrial fibrillation, the presence of 50% or more than 50% stenosis in the proximal and middle parts of the right coronary artery, a history of uncontrolled thyroid diseases, autoimmune diseases, previous percutaneous coronary interventions, cardiac surgeries, pacemaker implantation, bundle branch blocks, any degree of valvular stenosis, moderate or more-than-moderate valvular regurgitation, a history of cardiomyopathies, a previous MI, liver diseases, creatinine levels exceeding 1.5 mg/dL, hemodynamic instability in first 3 days after hospital admission, and a neglected MI. Ultimately, 92 patients with ASTEMI were included in our study. The patients’ drug history at admission was taken, and venous samples for laboratory examinations were drawn on the first morning after admission. The patients were treated in keeping with the latest validated recommendations [21,22,23].

The clinical endpoint was considered to be a composite of reinfarction or all-cause mortality that presented as major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The patients were followed up after index ASTEMI up to the end of January 2022 by telephone calls or outpatient visits, and medical documents were evaluated for the confirmation of reinfarction or death.

The control group, selected from a pool of subjects who had undergone elective coronary angiography between July and February 2019, consisted of 31 subjects who were matched with the case group in terms of age, sex, hypertension, and diabetes. The inclusion criteria for the control group were the absence of significant coronary artery stenosis (50% or > 50%) and the sinus rhythm. The exclusion criteria were the same as those for the ASTEMI group. Laboratory examinations for the control group were performed between pre-admission days 0 and 10.

Hypertension was defined as the consumption of antihypertensive drugs or a history of blood pressure exceeding 140/90 mm Hg in 2 separate measurements. Diabetes was defined as the use of antidiabetic agents or insulin or HbA1c levels exceeding 6.4% or fasting blood glucose levels exceeding 126 mg/dL in 2 isolated samples.

The study protocol was approved by our institutional review board, and written consent was obtained from the participants.

Standard echocardiography

Echocardiography was performed during the first 72 h after hospital admission for the patients with ASTEMI and on the discharge day for the control group. The echocardiographic examinations were performed while the patients were in the left lateral decubitus position and monitored by 1-lead electrocardiography. A commercial setting (Philips, Affinity 70C, Andover, MA, USA), with an S5-1 probe, was applied. All the echocardiographic evaluations were done by a single cardiologist highly specialized in echocardiography. LV volume at end-systole and end-diastole was measured in apical 4- and 2-chamber views, and LV ejection fraction was calculated according to the modified Simpson method. Mid-ventricular RV diameter at end-diastole, RV end-diastolic and end-systolic areas and fractional area change in the RV-focused 4-chamber view, and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion with the M-mode in the standard apical 4-chamber view were obtained. The tricuspid flow was obtained by pulsed-wave Doppler from the modified apical 4-chamber view, and peak early diastolic and late diastolic flows (E and A, respectively) and the deceleration time of the E wave were measured. The peak pressure gradient of the tricuspid regurgitant flow, if obtainable, was measured. By pulsed-wave tissue Doppler imaging, the systolic, early diastolic, and late diastolic waves of the lateral tricuspid were recorded, and the peak of these waves was measured. We followed the recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography for standard echocardiography measurement [24, 25].

2DSTE

Three consecutive cardiac cycles at end-expiration from the apical RV-focused 4-chamber view were obtained by the same cardiologist for 2DSTE at a rate of 47 ± 5 frames per second. The 2DSTE evaluations were done using QLAB 13 with the aCMQ package. At end-diastole, via the 3-click method, the medial and lateral tricuspid annuli and the mid-roof of the RA were defined. Thereafter, the endocardial and epicardial layers of the RA were traced automatically by the software, and the RA was divided into 6 equal segments. If required, appropriate adjustments were made with respect to the traced line for the endocardial and epicardial borders of the RA. Subsequently, by the selection of the “Compute” button, global strain and strain rate curves were visualized while the peak R was considered the 0 level. The strain curve has a peak in the systole, a plateau in the early diastole, and a nadir in the late diastole. The difference between the systolic peak and the late diastolic nadir was considered RA strain during the reservoir phase (RASr), the difference between the systolic peak and the early diastole was considered RA strain during the conduit phase (RAScd), and the difference between the early diastolic peak and the late diastolic nadir was considered RA strain during the contraction phase (RASct). The strain rate curve has 1 positive systolic peak (pRASRr, a marker of the reservoir function), 1 negative early diastolic peak (pRASRcd, a marker of the conduit function), and 1 late diastolic negative peak (pRASRct, a marker of the contraction function). The same method was applied for 2DSTE on the RV, and the 3-click points were the medial and lateral tricuspid annuli in the RV and its apex. The systolic strain curve of the RV has 1 systolic peak as a marker of the systolic function. The strain rate of the RV has 1 negative systolic peak as a marker of the systolic function and 2 positive peaks in early and late diastole as the indices of the diastolic function in the early and late diastole, respectively (Fig. 1). These deformation indices were measured for 3 segments of the RV free wall, and their average was considered the global value. The aforementioned deformation indices for the RA and the RV were measured in 3 cardiac cycles, and their mean was presented. We followed the recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography in this field [9].

Fig. 1
figure 1

The image depicts 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography of the right atrium in the modified apical 4-chamber view. A strain curves, B strain rate curves. pRASRcd, peak right atrial longitudinal strain rate during the conduit phase; pRASRct peak right atrial longitudinal strain rate during the contraction phase, pRASRr peak right atrial longitudinal strain rate during the reservoir phase, RAScd right atrial longitudinal strain during the conduit phase, RASct right atrial longitudinal strain during the contraction phase, RASr right atrial longitudinal strain during the reservoir phase

The aCMQ package depicted changes in the RA volume during the cardiac cycle, enabling the measurement of maximal RA volume, minimal RA volume, and pre–P-wave RA volume. The difference between maximal and minimal RA volumes was considered the total emptying volume (TEV), the difference between maximal and pre–P-wave volumes was considered the passive emptying volume (PEV), and the difference between pre–P-wave and the minimal RA volumes was considered the active emptying volume (AEV). The volumetric parameters of RA phasic functions were calculated as follows:

Reservoir function:

  • RA total emptying fraction = 100 × TEV/maximal RA volume

  • Expansion index = 100 × TEV/minimal RA volume

Conduit function:

  • Passive emptying fraction = 100 × PEV/maximal RA volume

  • Passive emptying percent of total emptying = 100 × PEV/TEV

Contraction function:

  • Active emptying fraction = 100 × AEV/pre-P RA volume

  • Booster active emptying percent of total emptying = 100 × AEV/TEV

Twenty-seven subjects (22%) were randomly selected for intra-and interobserver variability analysis. The first cardiologist and another cardiologist, who was also highly qualified in 2DSTE, independently measured the deformation markers of RA phasic functions 3 months after the study was completed.

Statistical analysis

Categorical data were shown as frequencies and percentages and compared using the χ2 or Fisher exact test, whichever one was appropriate. Continuous data were demonstrated as the mean and the standard deviation if they were normally distributed and as the median and the interquartile range if they were not normally distributed. The continuous data were compared using the t test if they were normally distributed and otherwise compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. Inter-and intraobserver variabilities were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Univariate Cox linear regression was applied to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) for the 2DSTE-derived indices of RA phasic functions. The statistical analyses were performed with IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 24 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp).

Results

The study population’s demographic characteristics, as well as clinical and laboratory data, are presented in Table 1 in brief and Additional file 1: Table S1 in detail. The mean heart rate was higher in the ASTEMI group (P < 0.001), as were the mean levels of fasting blood sugar and low-density lipoprotein (P = 0.014 and P < 0.001, respectively). The patients in the ASTEMI group smoked more cigarettes (P = 0.006) and consumed fewer beta-blockers (P < 0.001), statins (P ≤ 0.001), and aspirin (P < 0.001) at admission according to their drug history than the control subjects. In the ASTEMI group, significant stenosis in the left anterior descending artery was detected in all the patients, in the left circumflex artery in 15 (16%), in the distal portion of the right coronary artery in 9 (10%), and in the left main in 2 (2%). Seventy patients with ASTEMI (76%) had single-vessel disease, 19 (21%) had double-vessel disease, and 3 (3%) had triple-vessel disease. The time interval between symptom presentation and echocardiography was 26.75 (21.0–38.0) hours, the time interval between admission and echocardiography was 21.25 (15.0–31.5) hours, and the time interval between revascularization and echocardiography was 20.25 (14.0–30.75) hours.

Table 1 Demographic, clinical, and biochemical characteristics of the study groups

The standard echocardiography data are presented in Table 2 in brief and Additional file 1: Table S2 in detail. LV ejection fraction was reduced in the ASTEMI group by comparison with the control group (49% ± 9% vs 59% ± 6%; P < 0.001). LV end-systolic volume index was increased in the ASTEMI group (P < 0.001). In the patients with ASTEMI, RV end-diastolic and systolic areas were decreased (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively) and RV fractional area change was increased (P = 0.001). In the ASTEMI group, the deceleration time of the E wave and the e′/a′ ratio were decreased (P = 0.021 and P = 0.024, respectively), and a′ was increased (P < 0.001). Maximal, minimal, and pre-P RA volume indices were lower in the patients with ASTEMI than in the control group (P < 0.05). However, the volumetric parameters of RA phasic functions were not different between the 2 study groups.

Table 2 Standard echocardiography data of the study groups

The longitudinal 2D-STE-derived markers of RV and RA phasic functions are demonstrated in Table 3. In the patients with ASTEMI, there was a decline in RASr (33.2% ± 4.3% vs 30.5% ± 8.1%; P = 0.021) and RAScd (16% [12–18%] vs 14% [9–17%]; P = 0.048). The RV free wall late diastolic strain rate was increased in the ASTEMI group by comparison with the control group (2.2 ± 0.3 s−1 vs 2.6 ± 0.6 s−1; P < 0.001). The other 2D-STE-derived markers of RV and RA phasic functions were not different between the 2 study groups.

Table 3 Two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography data of the right atrium and the right ventricle of the study groups

The intra- and interobserver variability evaluation of the longitudinal deformation markers of the RA and the RV showed a good agreement (Additional file 1: Table S3).

There was no case of completely missed follow-ups. The follow-up duration was 16 months (95% CI 14–18 mon) with a minimum of 6 months. Four patients suffered MI, and 2 cases expired. There were no cases of stroke or hospitalization because of heart failure. The univariate Cox linear regression analysis demonstrated that RA contraction function indices were predictors of MACE occurrence (RASct: HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.67–0.97; P = 0.024 and pRASRct: HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.17–0.89; P = 0.026). The other 2DSTE-derived indices were not predictors of the occurrence of MACE (Additional file 1: Table S4).

Discussion

In this study, we drew upon 2DSTE to evaluate RA phasic functions in patients with ASTEMI and compared the findings with those in a control group. We found that in the ASTEMI group, the reservoir and conduit functions of the RA were impaired, and maximal, minimal, and pre-P RA volume indices were reduced. In addition, RA contraction function was predictive of MACE occurrence during the follow-up period.

To our knowledge, our investigation is the first study to evaluate RA phasic functions in patients with ASTEMI. Nourian et al. [6] demonstrated that RA reservoir and conduit functions were impaired in patients with inferior MI and RVMI compared with patients with inferior MI as evaluated by 2DSTE and concluded that impairments in RA functions preceded impairments in RV function. Kanar et al. [7], in similar groups of patients, found that RA conduit function as assessed by real-time 3D echocardiography was impaired in patients with inferior MI and RVMI in comparison with patients with inferior MI but without RVMI. While their findings are similar to our findings, our study population had ASTEMI but not RVMI. Nevertheless, since some parts of the RV are supplied by the left anterior descending artery, it cannot be assumed that the RV is not damaged by ASTEMI [25].

In a study, researchers utilized color-coded tissue Doppler imaging in patients with ASTEMI and demonstrated a decline in RV systolic function [26]. They, however, failed to define the time of echocardiography after ASTEMI, and they used an echocardiography modality that was not only dependent on the ultrasound beam angle but also associated with low spatial resolution, high noise, and interobserver variability [27]. Still, it seems that echocardiography was not capable of detecting this damage to the RV in all patients with ASTEMI [28, 29]. Similar to Nourian et al., we found that RA reservoir and conduit functions were impaired in patients with ASTEMI, while we detected no significant impairment in RV function in the same phase.

In a previous study, an evaluation of LA phasic functions in patients with STEMI revealed impairments in all the functions [30]. The difference between LA and RA phasic functions in the presence of STEMI may be correlated with the difference in the pressure of the ventricle that is in interaction with the LA or the RA and the amount of damage induced by MI.

In patients with ASTEMI, the stroke volume is acutely reduced, which may lead to lower return flow to the RA [31, 32]. The lower return of blood in each cardiac cycle to the RA results in less available blood for storage during the reservoir phase and less stretching of RA myocardium. This hypothesis is supported by our finding regarding a reduced maximal RA volume index in patients with ASTEMI. These changes in the reservoir phase are followed by decreased conduit function and preserved contraction function for adaptation. The pre-P RA volume index is representative of the status of RA myocardium at precontraction. The decreased RV end-diastolic and systolic areas were in alignment with these changes. In other words, the lower return of blood to the RV and the concomitant activation of the neurohormonal axis for the compensation of the reduced cardiac output may explain the changes demonstrated in RV size and function.

According to the Frank–Starling law, the length of the myocardial fiber at precontraction is positively correlated with the amount of contraction. Further, an increased heart rate exerts a detrimental effect on myocardial contraction [33]. In patients with ASTEMI, by comparison with a control group, while RA myocardial length is reduced and heart rate is increased, contraction function is preserved, implying that the reduced myocardial length and the increased heart rate are compensated for by other factors that potentiate myocardial contraction. These factors may include changes in the sympathetic system, the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone axis, and inflammatory mediators [31, 34].

With the occurrence of acute MI, the biochemical milieu where RA myocardial fibers function changes. Such alterations lead to changes in inflammatory and neurohormonal mediators, which may affect RA phasic functions [31, 34]. Hence, the phasic functions of the RA, regardless of the volume of blood that the chamber receives, may change. Moreover, the reduced reservoir and conduit functions and the preserved contraction function imply decreased delivery of blood to the RV and ultimately to the LA and the LV. Although these changes can be regarded as an adaptation mechanism in the presence of increased filling pressure and may prevent the occurrence of pulmonary edema, in some cases, they may lead to the deterioration of LV output.

In most patients with ASTEMI, RA pressure is elevated [35]. RA phasic functions are negatively correlated with RA pressure; accordingly, increased RA pressure may result in RA phasic dysfunction through a hypothesized mechanism: impairment in the circulatory blood flow system of the RA [36]. However, increased RA pressure may be considered a marker of RV diastolic dysfunction [37].

The RA and the RV function in interaction with each other, as do the LA and the LV; thus, RA phasic changes may denote changes that occur in the RV [38]. Accordingly, impaired reservoir and conduit functions may reflect systolic and early diastolic RV dysfunction in the presence of ASTEMI.

The patterns of RA phasic functions (reduced reservoir and conduit functions and preserved contraction function) have been observed in other conditions such as increased pulmonary arterial pressure and heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fractions [39, 40]. Nonetheless, it can be hypothesized that the continuation of RA contraction function in the presence of a reduction in the other phasic functions may lead to the exhaustion of the RA and the occurrence of atrial fibrillation [39].

Our findings regarding the prediction of MACE occurrence are not in line with those reported by Schuster et al. [5]. They applied cardiac magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate RA phasic functions and assessed the correlation between RA phasic functions and MACE. Their results demonstrated that RA conduit function was correlated with the occurrence of all-cause mortality, reinfarction, and congestive heart failure. Their sample size was larger than ours; moreover, their study population was heterogeneous and consisted of patients with non-STEMI and STEMI, including patients with RVMI. Notably, their study was a substudy of 2 other studies that utilized different vendors for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and, thus, suffered from selection bias. In contrast, not only did we employ a single vendor for imaging and exclude patients with RVMI, but also we used echocardiography, which is more available than cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and is less costly and time-consuming.

Of all atrial phasic functions, atrial contraction function is the most independent phasic function and depends the least on ventricular function [41]. RA contraction function was preserved early after ASTEMI compared with the control group. Nevertheless, impaired RA contraction function may be a marker of adaptive mechanism failure and reflective of contraction function decompensation when other RA phasic functions are impaired.

Our study results clinically imply the potential role of RA phasic functions in the hemodynamics of patients with STEMI and could help us not only to prevent the deterioration of RA phasic functions but also to potentiate them by considering the hemodynamic status of patients. Further, our results underscore the prognostic role of RA contraction function as evaluated by 2DSTE.

Study limitations

In the present small, single-center study, it was not feasible for us to evaluate RA phasic functions with 3D echocardiography, 3DSTE, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; we, therefore, assessed the phasic functions of the RA in the longitudinal direction. Another weakness of note is our use of software not originally designed for the evaluation of deformations in the RA.

Conclusions

In our patients with ASTEMI, in comparison with a control group, the reservoir and conduit functions of the RA were reduced, while its contraction function was preserved based on 2DSTE. Additionally, no systolic and early diastolic RV dysfunction was detected, whereas there was an increase in the late diastolic RV function. In addition, RA contraction function was predictive of all-cause mortality or reinfarction.

Availability of data and materials

The data sets analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Tadic M. The right atrium, a forgotten cardiac chamber: an updated review of multimodality imaging. J Clin Ultrasound. 2015;43:335–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pasipoularides A. Right and left ventricular diastolic pressure-volume relations: a comprehensive review. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2013;6:239–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Dokainish H, et al. Mean right atrial pressure for estimation of left ventricular filling pressure in patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction: invasive and noninvasive validation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018;31:799–806.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vakilian F, Tavallaie A, Alimi H, et al. Right atrial strain in the assessment of right heart mechanics in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;29:135–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schuster A, Backhaus SJ, Stiermaier T, et al. Impact of right atrial physiology on heart failure and adverse events after myocardial infarction. J Clin Med. 2020;9:210.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Nourian S, Hosseinsabet A, Jalali A, et al. Evaluation of right atrial function by two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography in patients with right ventricular myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;33:47–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kanar BG, Sunbul M, Sahin AA, et al. Evaluation of right atrial volumes and functions by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography in patients after acute inferior myocardial infarction. Echocardiography. 2018;35:1806–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Saha SK, Kiotsekoglou A, Gopal AS, et al. Biatrial and right ventricular deformation imaging: implications of the recent EACVI consensus document in the clinics and beyond. Echocardiography. 2019;36:1910–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Badano LP, Kolias TJ, Muraru D, et al. Standardization of left atrial, right ventricular, and right atrial deformation imaging using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: a consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;19:591–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tadic M, Ilic S, Cuspidi C, et al. Left and right atrial phasic function and deformation in untreated patients with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;31:65–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sun L, Wang Y, Dong Y, et al. Assessment of right atrium function in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus with different pulmonary artery systolic pressures by 2-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography. J Ultrasound Med. 2018;37:2345–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tadic M, Cuspidi C, Pencic B, et al. The association between heart rate variability and biatrial phasic function in arterial hypertension. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2014;8:699–708.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Leng S, Dong Y, Wu Y, et al. Impaired cardiovascular magnetic resonance-derived rapid semiautomated right atrial longitudinal strain is associated with decompensated hemodynamics in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12:e008582.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sareban M, Perz T, Macholz F, et al. Reliability of echocardiographic speckle-tracking derived bi-atrial strain assessment under different hemodynamic conditions. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;33:1685–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Brand A, Bathe M, Hübscher A, et al. Normative reference data, determinants, and clinical implications of right atrial reservoir function in women assessed by 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography. Echocardiography. 2018;35:1542–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Truong VT, Palmer C, Young M, et al. Right atrial deformation using cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking compared with two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in healthy volunteers. Sci Rep. 2020;10:5237.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Tello K, Dalmer A, Vanderpool R, et al. Right ventricular function correlates of right atrial strain in pulmonary hypertension: a combined cardiac magnetic resonance and conductance catheter study. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2020;318:H156–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Thomas L, Muraru D, Popescu BA, et al. Evaluation of left atrial size and function: relevance for clinical practice. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020;33:934–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tadic M, Cuspidi C, Kocijancic V, et al. Does left ventricular geometric patterns impact right atrial phasic function? Findings from the hypertensive population. Echocardiography. 2016;33:1186–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2018;138:e618–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2018;39:119–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2015 ACC/AHA/SCAI focused update on primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: an update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention and the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Circulation. 2016;133:1135–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians and Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;82:E1-27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28:1-39.e14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J, et al. Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23:685–713.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sonmez O, Kayrak M, Altunbas G, et al. Right ventricular involvement in anterior myocardial infarction: a tissue Doppler-derived strain and strain rate study. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013;68:1225–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tschöpe C, Kasner M. Can speckle-tracking imaging improve the reliability of echocardiographic parameters for outcome evaluation in clinical trials? Eur Heart J. 2014;35:605–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Abdeltawab AA, Elmahmoudy AM, Elnammas W, et al. Assessment of right ventricular function after successful revascularization for acute anterior myocardial infarction without right ventricular infarction by echocardiography. J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2019;31:261–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Konishi K, Dohi K, Tanimura M, et al. Quantifying longitudinal right ventricular dysfunction in patients with old myocardial infarction by using speckle-tracking strain echocardiography. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2013;11:23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Davarpasand T, Hosseinsabet A, Omidi F, et al. Interaction effect of diabetes and acute myocardial infarction on the left atrial function as evaluated by 2-D speckle-tracking echocardiography. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020;46:1490–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gabriel-Costa D. The pathophysiology of myocardial infarction-induced heart failure. Pathophysiology. 2018;25:277–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Goins AE, Rayson R, Yeung M, et al. The use of hemodynamics to predict mortality in patients undergoing primary PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2018;16:551–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Voigt JU, Cvijic M. 2- and 3-dimensional myocardial strain in cardiac health and disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12:1849–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mouton AJ, Rivera OJ, Lindsey ML. Myocardial infarction remodeling that progresses to heart failure: a signaling misunderstanding. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2018;315:H71–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Bergstra A, Svilaas T, van Veldhuisen DJ, et al. Haemodynamic patterns in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: incidence and correlates of elevated filling pressures. Neth Heart J. 2007;15:95–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Meng X, Li Y, Li H, et al. Right atrial function in patients with pulmonary hypertension: a study with two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography. Int J Cardiol. 2018;255:200–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kang MK. Right atrial strain as a surrogate marker for right ventricular function in patients with heart failure. J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;29:144–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Ramkumar S, Yang H, Wang Y, et al. Association of the active and passive components of left atrial deformation with left ventricular function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017;30:659–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Querejeta Roca G, Campbell P, Claggett B, et al. Right atrial function in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:e003521 (discussion e003521).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jain S, Kuriakose D, Edelstein I, et al. Right atrial phasic function in heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12:1460–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Thomas L, Marwick TH, Popescu BA, et al. Left atrial structure and function, and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:1961–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception: A.H. Work design: A.H., M.E., R.M. Data acquisition: A.H., M.E., R.M. Analysis: A.H. Interpretation of data: A.H., M.E., R.M. Drafting of the manuscript: A.H., M.E., R.M. Substantive revision of the manuscript: A.H., M.E., R.M. Approved submitted version: A.H., M.E., R.M. All the authors agree both to be personally accountable for their own contributions and to ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work, even ones in which the author was not personally involved, are appropriately investigated and resolved and the resolution is documented in the literature. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Hosseinsabet.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The research proposal was approved by Research Ethics Committees of School of Medicine-Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR.TUMS.MEDICINE.REC.1399.834) in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments and written informed consent was obtained from the whole study population.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Demographic, clinical, and biochemical characteristics of the study groups. Table S2. Standard echocardiography data of the study groups. Table S3. Intra- and interobserver variabilities for 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography-derived indices of the right atrial myocardial function. Table S4. Two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography data of the right atrium in anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients with and without major adverse cardiovascular events.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eisvand, M., Mohseni-Badalabadi, R. & Hosseinsabet, A. Evaluation of the right atrial phasic functions in patients with anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 22, 102 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02546-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02546-4

Keywords