Skip to main content
Download PDF

Current progress of fluoroquinolones-increased risk of aortic aneurysm and dissection

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders volume 21, Article number: 470 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Aortic aneurysm (AA) and aortic dissection (AD) are major life-threatening diseases around the world. AA is a localized or diffuse dilation of the aorta, while AD is the separation of the layers creating a false lumen within the aortic wall. Fluoroquinolones (FQ) remain one of the most important kind of antibiotics and have a wider clinical use and broad antibacterial spectrum. FQ were also reported to treat infected AA. The most common adverse events (AEs) of FQ are mild and reversible, like headaches, diarrhea and nausea. Due to FQ-related serious AEs, such as tendonitis and tendon rupture, chondrotoxicity, or retinal detachment, QT-prolongation and dysglycemia, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a black box warning for FQ for systemic use in 2016 and updated warnings for FQ several times since then. Of note, in December 2018, FDA issued several “black box warnings” against FQ with the latest safety announcement warning about an increased risk of ruptures in the aorta blood vessel in certain patients. Recently, many studies have indicated an association between FQ and an increase risk of AA and AD. However, the exact mechanism of FQ-induced AA/AD remains unclear. This review aims to highlight the latest research progress of the alarming association between FQ and AA/AD. Moreover, molecular mechanisms of FQ in increasing risk of AA and AD are explored. Hopefully, this review can provide novel insights into FQ-increased the risk of AA/AD and a starting place for stewardship interventions.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Aortic aneurysm (AA) and aortic dissection (AD) are major life-threatening diseases worldwide. Large AA diameters are associated with increased risk of aneurysm rupture—AD, which is the most devastating complication of aortic diseases. AA is a localized or diffuse dilation of the aorta resulting in at lease a 50% increase in the aortic diameter, while AD is the separation of the layers creating a false lumen within the aortic wall [1]. Population-based studies reported an annual incidence of AA of 3–13.7/100,000 population, and AD of 3–20/100,000 population [2,3,4]. Notably, for the elderly population, the annual incidence of AA is much higher at 130/100,000 population [5]. Over the past decades, it is suggested that the rate of mortality from AA and AD has risen ranging from 1.2 to 24.8 fold in many developed countries, such as the United States, Britain and Japan [6, 7]. Accordingly to some researches, aortic aneurysm and dissection (AAD) is associated with the weakness of the aortic wall due to congenital defects, prolonged hypertension, or chronic inflammation [1]. In addition, other risk factors including smoking, old age, male sex (men have a fourfold increased risk compared to women) and family history of aortic disease are also implicated in AAD [8].

Fluoroquinolones (FQ) are the most widely used prescribed antibiotics in the world. In the United States alone, about 30 million outpatient prescribed with FQ per year [9]. FQ shows activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, and are widely used to treat skin, urinary tract, bone, soft tissue, pulmonary infections and so on. Of note, FQ are also used to treat infected AA [8, 10]. It is reported that some adverse events (AEs) associated with FQ include tendonitis and tendon rupture, chondrotoxicity, peripheral neuropathy or retinal detachment, QT-prolongation and dysglycemia [8, 11]. The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a black box warning for FQ for systemic use in 2016 and updated warnings for FQ several times since then [8]. Recently, many studies have indicated an association between FQ and an increased risk of AAD [1, 4, 9, 12].

In light of the escalating concerns, the latest research progress of the alarming association between FQ and AAD are summarized. Moreover, molecular mechanisms of FQ in increasing risk of AAD are explored. Hopefully, this review can provide novel insights into FQ-induced the risk of AAD and a starting place for stewardship interventions.

Fluoroquinolones (FQ)

To our knowledge, FQ remain one of the most important kind of antibiotics used at present around the world. FQ have a wider clinical use and broad antibacterial spectrum against Gram-positive, Gram-negative, aerobic and anaerobic organisms [13]. Additionally, FQ were reported to exert activity on Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which may shorten the duration of treatment and reduce the emergence of bacterial resistance [14]. Besides their typical antibacterial activity, FQ also exhibited diverse atypical biological profiles, like anti-Alzheimer activities [15], anti-tumor [16], anti-malarial [17] and anti-tubercular [18].

Based on their spectrum of activity and their pharmacokinetic profile, FQ are classified into 5 categories. First generation FQ include nalidixic acid, oxolinic acid, pipemidic acid and rosoxacin, which have activity against Gram-negative bacteria [19]. However, they have limited clinical uses because of their short serum half-lives and are only used in Gram-negative bacteria-induced urinary tract infections (UTI) [19]. Second generation FQ contain ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, enoxacin, pefloxacin, lomefloxacin, nadifloxacin, rufloxacin, and ofloxacin, which have a much wider activity against Gram-negative bacteria including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and good activity against Gram-positive bacteria. Furthermore, they have longer serum half-lives. They are commonly used in tissue-based diseases, like complicated bladder infections, UTI, sexually transmitted diseases, specific types of pneumonia, pyelonephritis and skin infections [19]. Third generation FQ contain levofloxacin, pazufloxacin, temafloxacin, tosufloxacin, sparfloxacin, grepafloxacin, and balofloxacin, which have a much wider activity against Gram-negative bacteria including P. aeruginosa, and good activity against Gram-positive bacteria and anaerobes [20]. Moreover, they have longer serum half-lives. Fourth generation FQ include prulifloxacin, trovafloxacin, alatrofloxacin, delafloxacin, clinafloxacin, besifloxacin, sitafloxacin, finafloxacin, gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, and moxifloxacin, which have a much wider activity against Gram-positive bacteria, especially Streptococcus pneumoniae and Enterobacteriaceae, good activity against atypical bacteria, and variable activity against anaerobes [21]. In addition, they have longer serum half-lives. Of note, they are considered to act at both DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV and slow down process of bacterial resistance [20]. Fifth generation FQ include levonadifloxacin, nemonoxacin (non-fluorinated quinolone antibiotic), and zabofloxacin, which are undergoing clinical trials. It is suggested that they have higher potency against Gram-positive bacteria with better MIC values and Gram-negative bacteria. Zabofloxacin is considered to be effective in reproductive tract infections and UTI [22].

The most common AEs of FQ are mild and reversible, like headaches, diarrhea and nausea. However, we should pay more attention to FQ-related serious AEs, such as tendinitis and tendon rupture, hepatic toxicity, Clostridium difficile infections, prolonged QT interval, torsades de pointes, phototoxicity, dysglycemia, acute renal failure and seizures [23, 24]. A systematic review, meta-analysis and network meta-analysis conducted by Matok et al. [25] revealed that there was a significant association between FQ exposure and an increased risk of arrhythmia (85% increase) and cardiovascular mortality (71% increase). Specifically, moxifloxacin was considered to be ranked with the highest probability for arrhythmia and cardiovascular mortality [25]. Of note, in December 2018, FDA issued several “black box warnings” against FQ with the latest safety announcement warning about an increased risk of ruptures in the aorta blood vessel in certain patients.

AAD

According to anatomical location, AA can be classified into thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). TAA exhibits much stronger hereditary and occurs commonly at younger ages with no obvious correlation with gender [26]. For example, some of these familial TAA patients harbor established monogenic forms of disease, like Marfan or Loeys-Dietz syndromes. However, it is reported that up to 20% of individuals with thoracic disease do not have a syndrome but do have related family members with disease (Familial Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm and Dissection or FTAAD) [27]. The risk factors associated with AAA include increasing age, male sex and lifestyle-related risk factors, like smoking, hypertension and hypercholesterolemia, which share many risk factors with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease [28]. Additionally, inherited factors are also involved in the progression of AAA [29].

Numerous studies have highlighted the critical roles of smooth muscle function and extracellular matrix (ECM) (collagen and elastic fibers) in structural integrity of the arterial wall. Collagen and elastic fibers play important roles in the mechanical properties of the vessel wall. At the pathological level, TAA is characterized by medial degeneration, including elastic fibers fragmentation and loss of elastic tissue, vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) loss, defects in collagen microarchitecture, proteoglycan deposition and a less remarkable inflammatory cells infiltration. Moreover, three important pathological marks are displayed in the progression of AAA: ECM degradation, VSMCs loss and infiltration of macrophages, neutrophils, mast cells and T/B lymphocytes. The imbalance between the production of active martix metalloproteins (MMPs) and their inhibitors (tissue inhibitor of MMPs, TIMPs) would cause the action active of MMPs to mediate ECM degration, which is implicated in the pathogensis of AA. According to the research, the expression of MMP-1, -9, -12, and -14 and MMP-2 were the most notably in the aortic wall of TAA, while MMP-1, -2, -3, -9, -12, and -13 were increased in AAA [30]. What is more, several studies described MMP-9 for TAA and MMP-3 for AAA as potentially important factors [30]. VSMCs in TAAD changed the phenotype from contractile to synthetic, and enriched with the expression of elastin- and collagen-degrading MMPs at the site of dissection [31]. In addition, lysyl oxidase (LOX) is a copper-dependent amine oxidase that catalyzes the formation of cross-linking in collagen fibers and elastic lamellae [27]. β-Aminopropionitrile (BAPN)-treated animals have been widely used as a model of AAD. As a lathyrogen, BAPN could irreversibly suppress the LOX, thus inhibiting the cross-linking of collagen fibers and elastic lamellae. Lee et al. [32] demonstrated that a missense mutation in LOX would cause AAD in humans.

FQ-increased the risk of AAD

Recently, lots of laboratory-based studies and clinical studies have raised concern that FQ use could increase the incidence of AAD. Some recent systematic meta-analyses confirmed that there was a strong statistical association between FQ and AAD [12, 33,34,35,36,37,38]. By comparing with or without FQ exposure in 1 million general population in Taiwan, Lee et al. [1] found an increased risk in AAD with FQ use (rate ratio [RR] = 2.43; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.83–3.22). In the case-crossover study based on a large population-based database, Lee et al. [4] investigated twofold increase the risk of AAD after FQ exposure. In a self-controlled case series analysis, it is revealed that FQ should be used to serious infectious without appropriated alternatives because of its serious cardiovascular adverse events [39].

In a Canadian study, comparing with nonusers, Daneman et al. [40] suggested that FQ induced a similar increased risk of AA or AD. Otherwise, comparing with amoxicillin users, results in a Swedish study revealed that FQ increased a higher risk of AA but not AD [9]. Additionally, The latest study demonstrated that oral FQ were associated with increased incidence of aneurysm formation in United States adults (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.20; 95% CI 1.17–1.24) [41]. A meta-analysis revealed that the risk increase for FQ-induced AA alone was significant (adjusted RR = 2.23; 95% CI 2.01–2.45; I2 = 0%). However, the risk increase for FQ-induced AD alone was not significant (adjusted RR = 1.88; 95% CI 0.11–3.65; I2 = 74%) [33].

Duration of FQ use and the incidence of AAD

As depicted in Table 1, susceptible period analysis further revealed that current FQ use within 60 days was associated with the highest risk of AAD [1, 4, 9, 12, 33, 40]. Lee et al. [4] observed that there was an increased risk of AAD with prolonged FQ use (OR = 2.41 for 3- to 14-day exposure; OR = 2.83 for > 14-day exposure; 95% CI 1.83–3.2). More specifically, FQ use within 60 days was associated with the highest risk of AAD.

Table 1 Duration of FQ use and the incidence of AAD
Full size table

Howard et al. [42] found higher risk of AAD was associated with FQ exposure for longer than 14 days (OR = 2.83, 95% CI 1.06–7.57). What is more, Pasternak et al. [9] observed that there was no increased risk of AAD with FQ exposure for more than 60 days (61–120 days) (HR = 0.67; 95% CI 0.40–1.11). However, recent results indicated that FQ were associated with increased 90-day incidence of AAA (HR = 1.31; 95% CI 1.25–1.37), iliac artery aneurysm (HR = 1.60; 95% CI 1.33–1.91), and other AAA (HR = 1.58; 95% CI 1.39–1.79) [41]. Of note, the investigator suggested that FQ should be used with caution in adults, not just in high-risk individuals [41].

Types and dosage forms of FQ use and the incidence of AAD

As shown in Table 2, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin are the most commonly prescribed FQ class of antibiotics, which are identified by the FDA and the EMA as being strongly associated with AAD [43]. In an recent study, Dolladille et al. identified 103 FQ-related AAD reports and a total of 264,917 FQ-related reports. They observed that all FQ (OR = 1.57; 95% CI 1.12–2.09), ciprofloxacin (OR = 2.89; 95% CI 2.24–3.74), levofloxacin (OR = 2.89; 95% CI 2.24–3.74) and moxifloxacin (OR = 3.22; 95% CI 2.21–4.71) increased the incidence of AAD [44]. Otherwise, there was no significant association of ofloxacin with the risk of AAD (OR = 0.79; 95% CI 0.33–1.91) [44].

Table 2 Types of FQ use and the incidence of AAD
Full size table

By assessing three FQ (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin)-related AAD from data (2004–2016) mining of the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), Sun et al. [45] indicated that they were associated with AA and only levofloxacin was associated with AD. Moreover, the incidence of AA was much higher than AD [45]. A case/non-case study using Vigibase® (2009–2015) observed the highest risk of AAD with levofloxacin [8]. With the Vigibase® between 1972 and 2017, François Montastruc et al. found that only levofloxacin increased the incidence of AAD (OR = 3.25, 95% CI 1.83–4.23) [46]. Additionally, no case of AAD was reported with enoxacin, fleroxacin, gemifloxacin, grepafloxacin, lomefloxacin, norfloxacin, pazufloxacin, pefloxacin, prulifloxacin, rufloxacin, sparfloxacin, temafloxacin, trovafloxacin [46]. In a mouse model of AAD, ciprofloxacin increased the incidence of AAD (38 of 48 [79%]; P = 0.001; χ2 = 10.9), severe AAD (32 of 48 [67%]; P < 0.001; χ2 = 15.7), and rupture and premature death (7 of 48 [15%]; P = 0.01; χ2 = 6.0) [47].

Data from FDA adverse event reporting system confirmed that oral FQ was more likely to induce AAD than intravenous administration [45]. In addition, compared with intravenous administration of FQ, oral FQ were more likely to be implicated in the increased risk of AAD [8]. In the case-crossover study based on a large population-based database, Lee et al. [4] found that oral FQ increased the risk of AAD (RR = 2.28; 95% CI 1.67–3.13). Consistent with this findings, a nationwide historical cohort study in Sweden (2006–2013) also demonstrated that oral FQ were associated with a 66% increased rate of AAD [9]. Lee et al. [1] conducted a nested case–control analysis of 1477 case patients and 147,700 matched control cases from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) from among 1 million individuals longitudinally (2000.1–2011.11), the risk of AAD was increased in patients using oral FQ. Compared with amoxicillin-clavulanate, azithromycin, cephalexin, clindamycin, and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, oral FQ can increase 90-day incidence of AAA (HR = 1.31; 95% CI 1.25–1.37), iliac artery aneurysm (HR = 1.60; 95% CI 1.33–1.91), and other AAA (HR = 1.58; 95% CI 1.39–1.79) [41]. A recent study confirmed that ciprofloxacin significantly increased the incidence of AAD (79%) in mice [47].

Users of FQ and incidence of AAD

As depicted in Table 3, nationwide cohort study of adults with pneumonia or UTI results found that an increased relative rate of AA/AD associated with FQ within the pneumonia but not within the UTI [48]. Of note, FQ had an increased risk in AA/AD comparing to azithromycin (HR = 2.57; 95% CI 1.36–4.86; incidence, 0.03% for FQ vs 0.01% for azithromycin) but no increased rate comparing to combined trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole (HR = 0.99; 95% CI 0.62–1.57; incidence, < 0.01% in both UTI groups). A recent reported revealed that FQ in patients with AD or AA had a higher risk of all-cause death (adjusted HR = 1.61; 95% CI 1.50–1.73), aortic death (adjusted HR = 1.80; 95% CI 1.50–2.15), and later aortic surgery [49].

Table 3 Users of FQ and incidence of AAD
Full size table

By analyzing the hospital admissions data containing information on 22 million adult hospitalizations in the United States from the Advisory Board billing and administrative database (2009–2015), researchers demonstrated that 18% of the 437,045 patients with AD were exposed to FQ and 19% of 27,876 AAD patients received FQ before the aortic repair. In addition, of the 1872 patients with Marfan syndrome, 14% received FQ during a hospital admission [8]. What’s more, Guzzardi et al. [50] suggested that patients with alpha-1 antitrypsin (A1AT) deficiency and longstanding FQ use (26 months) may have a higher risk of AAD.

Daneman et al. [40] observed a two- to threefold increase risk of AA in a larger longitudinal cohort study consisting of more than 1.7 million older adults turning 65 years in Ontario (HR = 2.72; 95% CI 2.53–2.93; adjusted HR = 2.24; 95% CI 2.02–2.49). Pasternak et al. [9] also described about twofold increase in AAD in 2.3 million elderly patients ( aged 50 years or older) with FQ use comparing to amoxicillin use (HR = 1.66; 95% CI 1.12–2.46). Lee et al. [1] found that the risk increase of AAD was more substantial in patients older than 70 years (RR = 1.72; 95% CI 1.37–2.16) than in patients 70 years or younger (RR = 1.46; 95% CI 0.98–2.18). And, it was more substantial in female patients (RR = 1.83; 95% CI 1.27–2.64) than in male patients (RR = 1.61; 95% CI 1.28–2.03) [1]. A meta-analysis revealed that FQ-increased the risk of AAD was higher in females compared to males (RR = 1.87; 95% CI 1.24–2.51; I2 = 0% versus RR = 1.58; 95% CI 1.25–1.92; I2 = 0%, respectively). What is more, it was higher in older patients compared to younger patients (RR = 1.72; 95% CI 1.3–2.07; I2 = 0% versus RR = 1.47; 95% CI 0.91–2.04; I2 = 0%, respectively) [33]. Otherwise, in a mouse model of AAD, they observed an increased risk of AAD in different aortic segments and no difference between male and female mice [47]. The latest study demonstrated that oral FQ were associated with increased incidence of aneurysm formation in United States adults (HR = 1.20; 95% CI 1.17–1.24) [41]. More specifically, adults aged 35 years or older had an increased risk in AA (18–34 years: HR = 0.99; 95% CI 0.83–1.18; 35–49 years: HR = 1.18; 95% CI 1.09–1.28; 50–64 years: HR = 1.24; 95% CI 1.19–1.28; P = 0.04) [41].

Of course, there are different points of view in some studies. Relative to combined amoxicillin-clavulanate or combined ampicillin-sulbactam (OR = 1.01; 95% CI 0.82–1.24) or with extended-spectrum cephalosporins (OR = 0.88; 95% CI 0.70–1.11) among patients with indicated infections, Dong et al. [51] observed that FQ didn’t increase the risk of AAD in a nested case–control study. A case-time-control study was performed with French National Insurance databases covering > 60 million inhabitants. Comparing with amoxicillin (OR = 0.97; 95% CI 0.61–1.53), there was no an excess of risk of intracranial aneurysm or dissection with FQ exposure (OR = 0.92; 95% CI 0.46–1.86) [52].

Genetic predisposition and FQ-induced increased risk of AAD

According to some finds, there are multiple genetic syndromes associated with aortic aneurysmal disease, such as Marfan syndrome (FBN1), Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (COL5A1, COL5A2, COL3A1), Loeys-Dietz syndrome (TGFBR1, TGFBR2), FTAAD (TGFBR2, MYH1, ACTA2), and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (PDK1, PKD2) [53]. Genetic studies explored that ciprofloxacin-associated neuropsychiatric toxicities may related to one specific CYP450 gene in patients [54]. Of note, Guzzardi et al. [50] suggested that patients with alpha-1 antitrypsin (A1AT) deficiency and longstanding FQ use (26 months) may have a higher risk of AAD. However, there are a few reports about genetic predisposition and FQ-induced increased risk of AAD.

Mechanisms of FQ-induced AAD

The exact mechanism of FQ-induced AAD remains unclear. Some hypothesized biological mechanisms have been proposed, as depicted in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Mechanisms of FQ-induced AAD. FQ induces ECM remodeling via promoting MMP activation and inhibiting TIMP-1/2, P4H, Lysyl hydroxylase and LOX. FQ decreases cell proliferation and increases cell apoptosis through promoting mitochondrial dysfunction, ROS production, activation of STING. Patients with A1AT deficiency may associated with FQ-induced AAD. FQ fluoroquinolones, MMP martix metalloprotein, TIMP tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinase, P4H prolyl 4-hydroxylase, LOX lysyl oxidase, ROS reactive oxygen species, STING stimulator of interferon genes, A1AT alpha-1 antitrypsin, ECM extracellular matrix, AAD aortic aneurysm and dissection

Full size image

FQ may interfere with ECM integrity in the aortas. Dysregulation of ECM homeostasis disrupted ECM integrity and impaired biomechanical strength, which finally triggered progressive aortic weakening, dissection, or rupture [55]. According to some studies, enzymatic degradation of ECM by MMPs and vascular remodeling constituted the most prominent characters of AA [56]. However, TIMPs may inhibit the development of AA. Evidence confirmed that FQ reduced collagen production in tenocytes [57] and fibroblasts [58]. Plenty of researches showed that ciprofloxacin (the most commonly used FQ) suppressed TIMP-1 expression but enhanced MMP expression in the cornea [59], in tendon cells and tissues [57, 60], and in fibroblasts [61], which finally promoted MMP activation and tissue destruction.

It was suggested that ciprofloxacin greatly up-regulated MMP activity more than twofold in cultured human aortic smooth muscle cells (HASMCs) [62]. Human aortic fibroblasts exposed to FQ showed an increased capacity for ECM dysregulation by reducing the expression of collagen and endogenous protease inhibitors protein. They further demonstrated collagen degradation and decreased TIMPs activity in human aortic fibroblasts cultured with 2 days FQ [63]. A recent study confirmed that ciprofloxacin significantly increased the incidence of AAD (79%) in mice [47]. Specifically, in the mouse model of AAD that ciprofloxacin exposure reduced the expression of LOX, an critical enzyme in the assembly and stabilization of elastic fibers and collagen. Meantime, ciprofloxacin us enhanced MMP expression and activity as well as elastic fiber fragmentation in the aortas. Furthermore, in cultured smooth muscle cells, ciprofloxacin markedly down-regulated LOX levels and activity while up-regulated MMP levels.

Myofibroblasts have an abundant cell population in the aortic wall adventitia and have a capacity for structural arterial ECM remodeling. Another recent study found that FQ exposure induced an imbalance of ECM regulatory processes and enhance the capacity of human aortic myofibroblasts for ECM remodeling [64]. In addition, ciprofloxacin greatly reduced TIMP1 and TIMP2 expression while induced MMP9 to TIMP2 ration and collagen-1 expression in cultured human aortic myofibroblasts [64].

To our knowledge, FQ is considered to be powerful iron chelators. Prolyl 4-hydroxylase (P4H) and lysyl hydroxylase are iron-dependent enzymes, which play central roles in the post-translational modification of collagen. These enzymes promote collagen maturation through hydroxylation of proline and lysine residues to induce collagen cross-linking, which is essential for the tensile strength of collagen fibers. Badal et al. [65] demonstrated that FQ (norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, enrofloxacin)-meidated iron chelation suppressed collagen maturation by inhibiting P4H and lysyl hydroxylase. FQ also exerted chelating properties against some other ions, including magnesium [66, 67] and calcium [67], which finally influenced collagen synthesis.

In addition, the effect of FQ on the inhibition of cell proliferation and induction of cell apoptosis may lead to aortic destruction. Evidence showed that FQ inhibited cell proliferation in various cells, including tenocytes [68], osteoblasts [69] and chondrocytes [70], and induced cell apoptosis in various cells, like tenocytes [57] and lens epithelial cells [71]. A recent study found that ciprofloxacin induced aortic cell injury in the aortas in a mouse model of AAD [47]. Furthermore, ciprofloxacin suppressed cell proliferation and promoted cell death in cultured HASMCs [47]. Mechanically, as a DNA topoisomerase inhibitor, ciprofloxacin induced nuclear and mitochondrial DNA damage and the the release of DNA, which finally promoted mitochondrial dysfunction, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, activation of STING (stimulator of interferon genes, the cytosolic DNA sensor) and cell death [47]. However, in cultured human aortic myofibroblasts, ciprofloxacin exerted no significant effects on cell apoptosis, necrosis and metabolic viability [64].

Conclusion and future prospects

According to the studies, exposure to FQ is substantially associated with the increase risk of AAD. Given the global burden of AAD and the growing FQ use around the world, well-designed studies in populations, especially high-risk populations, should be conducted. It is worthy to launch animal studies to clarify the pathophysiological mechanism of this association. What is more, it would be especially important to illustrate how FQ interact with the aortas. Better and direct understanding of the exact mechanism of FQ—induced AAD is imperative and essential. The last, but not the least, clinicians should carefully consider and balance the risks of AAD associated with FQ exposure against their established benefits.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

AA:

Aortic aneurysm

AD:

Aortic dissection

FQ:

Fluoroquinolone

AEs:

Adverse events

FDA:

Food and Drug Administration

TAA:

Thoracic aortic aneurysm

AAA:

Abdominal aortic aneurysm

FTAAD:

Familial Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm and Dissection

ECM:

Extracellular matrix

VSMCs:

Vascular smooth muscle cells

MMPs:

Martix metalloproteins

BAPN:

β-Aminopropionitrile

FAERS:

Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System

HASMCs:

Human aortic smooth muscle cells

References

  1. Lee CC, Lee MT, Chen YS, Lee SH, Chen SC, Chang SC. Risk of aortic dissection and aortic aneurysm in patients taking oral fluoroquinolone. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(11):1839–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Howard DP, Banerjee A, Fairhead JF, Perkins J, Silver LE, Rothwell PM. Population-based study of incidence and outcome of acute aortic dissection and premorbid risk factor control: 10-year results from the Oxford Vascular Study. Circulation. 2013;127(20):2031–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang SW, Huang YB, Huang JW, Chiu CC, Lai WT, Chen CY. Epidemiology, clinical features, and prescribing patterns of aortic aneurysm in Asian population from 2005 to 2011. Medicine. 2015;94(41):e1716.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee CC, Lee MG, Hsieh R, Porta L, Lee WC, Lee SH, Chang SS. Oral fluoroquinolone and the risk of aortic dissection. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(12):1369–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Howard DP, Banerjee A, Fairhead JF, Handa A, Silver LE, Rothwell PM. Population-based study of incidence of acute abdominal aortic aneurysms with projected impact of screening strategy. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4(8):e001926.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sampson UK, Norman PE, Fowkes FG, Aboyans V, Yanna S, Harrell FE Jr, Forouzanfar MH, Naghavi M, Denenberg JO, McDermott MM, Criqui MH, Mensah GA, Ezzati M, Murray C. Global and regional burden of aortic dissection and aneurysms: mortality trends in 21 world regions, 1990 to 2010. Glob Heart. 2014;9(1):171-80e10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sidloff D, Choke E, Stather P, Bown M, Thompson J, Sayers R. Mortality from thoracic aortic diseases and associations with cardiovascular risk factors. Circulation. 2014;130(25):2287–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Frankel WC, Trautner BW, Spiegelman A, Grigoryan L, LeMaire SA. Patients at risk for aortic rupture often exposed to fluoroquinolones during hospitalization. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63(2):e01712-18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Pasternak B, Inghammar M, Svanstrom H. Fluoroquinolone use and risk of aortic aneurysm and dissection: nationwide cohort study. BMJ. 2018;360:k678.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Linder JA, Huang ES, Steinman MA, Gonzales R, Stafford RS. Fluoroquinolone prescribing in the United States: 1995 to 2002. Am J Med. 2005;118(3):259–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jackson MA, Schutze GE. The use of systemic and topical fluoroquinolones. Pediatrics. 2016;138(5):e1034–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yu X, Jiang DS, Wang J, Wang R, Chen T, Wang K, Cao S, Wei X. Fluoroquinolone use and the risk of collagen-associated adverse events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug Saf. 2019;42:1025–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ezelarab HAA, Abbas SH, Hassan HA, Abuo-Rahma GEA. Recent updates of fluoroquinolones as antibacterial agents. Arch Pharm. 2018;351(9):e1800141.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Drobac PC, del Castillo H, Sweetland A, Anca G, Joseph JK, Furin J, Shin S. Treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis during pregnancy: long-term follow-up of 6 children with intrauterine exposure to second-line agents. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2005;40(11):1689–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pudlo M, Luzet V, Ismaili L, Tomassoli I, Iutzeler A, Refouvelet B. Quinolone-benzylpiperidine derivatives as novel acetylcholinesterase inhibitor and antioxidant hybrids for Alzheimer disease. Bioorg Med Chem. 2014;22(8):2496–507.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Abdel-Aziz M, Park SE, Abuo-Rahma Gel D, Sayed MA, Kwon Y. Novel N-4-piperazinyl-ciprofloxacin-chalcone hybrids: synthesis, physicochemical properties, anticancer and topoisomerase I and II inhibitory activity. Eur J Med Chem. 2013;69:427–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Li J, Li S, Bai C, Liu H, Gramatica P. Structural requirements of 3-carboxyl-4(1H)-quinolones as potential antimalarials from 2D and 3D QSAR analysis. J Mol Graph Model. 2013;44:266–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shandil RK, Jayaram R, Kaur P, Gaonkar S, Suresh BL, Mahesh BN, Jayashree R, Nandi V, Bharath S, Balasubramanian V. Moxifloxacin, ofloxacin, sparfloxacin, and ciprofloxacin against Mycobacterium tuberculosis: evaluation of in vitro and pharmacodynamic indices that best predict in vivo efficacy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51(2):576–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Koba M, Baczek T, Macur K, Bober L, Frackowiak T, Bucinski A, Rystok-Grabska D, Stasiak J, Koba K. Factor analysis of microbiological activity data and structural parameters of antibacterial quinolones. J Mol Model. 2010;16(2):327–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang GF, Zhang S, Pan B, Liu X, Feng LS. 4-Quinolone derivatives and their activities against Gram positive pathogens. Eur J Med Chem. 2018;1(143):710–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lan NT, Lien HT, le Tung B, Borgdorff MW, Kremer K, van Soolingen D. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing genotype and risk for treatment failure and relapse, Vietnam. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9(12):1633–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang GF, Liu X, Zhang S, Pan B, Liu ML. Ciprofloxacin derivatives and their antibacterial activities. Eur J Med Chem. 2018;25(146):599–612.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu HH. Safety profile of the fluoroquinolones: focus on levofloxacin. Drug Saf. 2010;33(5):353–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kuula LSM, Viljemaa KM, Backman JT, Blom M. Fluoroquinolone-related adverse events resulting in health service use and costs: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(4):e0216029.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Gorelik E, Masarwa R, Perlman A, Rotshild V, Abbasi M, Muszkat M, Matok I. Fluoroquinolones and cardiovascular risk: a systematic review, meta-analysis and network meta-analysis. Drug Saf. 2019;42(4):529–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Olsson C, Granath F, Stahle E. Family history, comorbidity and risk of thoracic aortic disease: a population-based case-control study. Heart. 2013;99(14):1030–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lin CJ, Lin CY, Stitziel NO. Genetics of the extracellular matrix in aortic aneurysmal diseases. Matrix Biol J Int Soc Matrix Biol. 2018;71–72:128–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Forsdahl SH, Singh K, Solberg S, Jacobsen BK. Risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysms: a 7-year prospective study: the Tromso Study, 1994–2001. Circulation. 2009;119(16):2202–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Larsson E, Granath F, Swedenborg J, Hultgren R. A population-based case-control study of the familial risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49(1):47–50 (discussion 1).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang Q, Ding Y, Song P, Zhu H, Okon I, Ding YN, Chen HZ, Liu DP, Zou MH. Tryptophan-derived 3-hydroxyanthranilic acid contributes to angiotensin II-induced abdominal aortic aneurysm formation in mice in vivo. Circulation. 2017;136(23):2271–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ishii T, Asuwa N. Collagen and elastin degradation by matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinase in aortic dissection. Hum Pathol. 2000;31(6):640–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee VS, Halabi CM, Hoffman EP, Carmichael N, Leshchiner I, Lian CG, Bierhals AJ, Vuzman D, Mecham RP, Frank NY, Stitziel NO. Loss of function mutation in LOX causes thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113(31):8759–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Rawla P, Helou MLE, Vellipuram AR. Fluoroquinolones and the risk of aortic aneurysm or aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Hematol Agents Med Chem. 2019;17:3–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Singh S, Nautiyal A. Aortic dissection and aortic aneurysms associated with fluoroquinolones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2017;130(12):1449–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Noman AT, Qazi AH, Alqasrawi M, Ayinde H, Tleyjeh IM, Lindower P, Bin Abdulhak AA. Fluoroquinolones and the risk of aortopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2019;1(274):299–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Vouga Ribeiro N, Gouveia Melo R, Guerra NC, Nobre Â, Fernandes RM, Pedro LM, Costa J, Pinto FJ, Caldeira D. Fluoroquinolones are associated with increased risk of aortic aneurysm or dissection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020.

  37. Dai XC, Yang XX, Ma L, Tang GM, Pan YY, Hu HL. Relationship between fluoroquinolones and the risk of aortic diseases: a meta-analysis of observational studies. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020;201(1):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wee I, Chin B, Syn N, et al. The association between fluoroquinolones and aortic dissection and aortic aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Aspinall SL, Sylvain NP, Zhao X, Zhang R, Dong D, Echevarria K, Glassman PA, Goetz MB, Miller DR, Cunningham FE. Serious cardiovascular adverse events with fluoroquinolones versus other antibiotics: a self-controlled case series analysis. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2020;86(6):e00664.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Daneman N, Lu H, Redelmeier DA. Fluoroquinolones and collagen associated severe adverse events: a longitudinal cohort study. BMJ Open. 2015;5(11):e010077.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Newton ER, Akerman AW, Strassle PD, Kibbe MR. Association of fluoroquinolone use with short-term risk of development of aortic aneurysm. JAMA Surg. 2021;156:264–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Howard DP, Banerjee A, Fairhead JF, et al. Age-specific incidence, risk factors and outcome of acute abdominal aortic aneurysms in a defined population. Br J Surg. 2015;102(8):907–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Bennett AC, Bennett CL, Witherspoon BJ, et al. An evaluation of reports of ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin-association neuropsychiatric toxicities, long-term disability, and aortic aneurysms/dissections disseminated by the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2019;18(11):1055–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Dolladille C, Chrétien B, Sassier M, et al. Fluoroquinolone and aortic dissection: is it a class effect? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(3):382–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Meng L, Huang J, Jia Y, Huang H, Qiu F, Sun S. Assessing fluoroquinolone-associated aortic aneurysm and dissection: data mining of the public version of the FDA adverse event reporting system. Int J Clin Pract. 2019;73(5):e13331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Sommet A, Bénévent J, Rousseau V, et al. What fluoroquinolones have the highest risk of aortic aneurysm? A case/non-case study in vigiBase®. Soc Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(4):502–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. LeMaire SA, Zhang L, Luo W, Ren P, Azares AR, Wang Y, Zhang C, Coselli JS, Shen YH. Effect of ciprofloxacin on susceptibility to aortic dissection and rupture in mice. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(9):e181804.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Gopalakrishnan C, Bykov K, Fischer MA, Connolly JG, Gagne JJ, Fralick M. Association of fluoroquinolones with the risk of aortic aneurysm or aortic dissection. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180:1596–605.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Chen SW, Chan YH, Chien-Chia Wu V, et al. Effects of fluoroquinolones on outcomes of patients with aortic dissection or aneurysm. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77(15):1875–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Guzzardi DG, Hassanabad AF, Bromley AB, et al. Fluoroquinolone-associated type A aortic dissection in alpha-1 anti-trypsin deficiency. Ann Thorac Sur. 2020;110(6):e489–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Dong YH, Chang CH, Wang JL, et al. Association of infections and use of fluoroquinolones with the risk of aortic aneurysm or aortic dissection. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(12):1587–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Maumus-Robert S, Debette S, Bérard X, et al. Risk of intracranial aneurysm and dissection and fluoroquinolone use: a case-time-control study. Stroke. 2020;51(3):994–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Cury M, Zeidan F, Lobato AC, et al. Aortic disease in the young: genetic aneurysm syndromes, connective tissue disorders, and familial aortic aneurysms and dissections. Int J Vasc Med. 2013;2013:267215.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Bennett A, Qureshi ZP, Bennett CL. A novel genetic marker has been identified in patients with fluoroquinolone-associated neuropyschiatric toxicity: preliminary findings. Federal Pract. 2017;S30.

  55. Hoefer IE, den Adel B, Daemen MJ. Biomechanical factors as triggers of vascular growth. Cardiovasc Res. 2013;99(2):276–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Hadi T, Boytard L, Silvestro M, Alebrahim D, Jacob S, Feinstein J, Barone K, Spiro W, Hutchison S, Simon R, Rateri D, Pinet F, Fenyo D, Adelman M, Moore KJ, Eltzschig HK, Daugherty A, Ramkhelawon B. Macrophage-derived netrin-1 promotes abdominal aortic aneurysm formation by activating MMP3 in vascular smooth muscle cells. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):5022.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Sendzik J, Shakibaei M, Schafer-Korting M, Lode H, Stahlmann R. Synergistic effects of dexamethasone and quinolones on human-derived tendon cells. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010;35(4):366–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Orobello NC, Dirain CO, Schultz G, Milne-Davies BA, Ng MR, Antonelli PJ. Ciprofloxacin decreases collagen in mouse tympanic membrane fibroblasts. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Off J Am Acad Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;155(1):127–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Sharma C, Velpandian T, Baskar Singh S, Ranjan Biswas N, Bihari Vajpayee R, Ghose S. Effect of fluoroquinolones on the expression of matrix metalloproteinase in debrided cornea of rats. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2011;21(1):6–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Tsai WC, Hsu CC, Chen CP, Chang HN, Wong AM, Lin MS, Pang JH. Ciprofloxacin up-regulates tendon cells to express matrix metalloproteinase-2 with degradation of type I collagen. J Orthop Res Off Publ Orthop Res Soc. 2011;29(1):67–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Bujor AM, Haines P, Padilla C, Christmann RB, Junie M, Sampaio-Barros PD, Lafyatis R, Trojanowska M. Ciprofloxacin has antifibrotic effects in scleroderma fibroblasts via downregulation of Dnmt1 and upregulation of Fli1. Int J Mol Med. 2012;30(6):1473–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Wang D, Jahangir A, Tajik JK. Ciprofloxacin enhances matrix metalloproteinases activity in human ASMCs. J Patient-Centered Res Rev. 2014;1:58–9.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Guzzardi D, Teng G, Svystonyuk D. Fluoroquinolone induces human aortic fibroblast mediated extracellular matrix dysregulation. Can J Cardiol. 2017;33:38–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Guzzardi DG, Teng G, Kang S, Geeraert PJ, Pattar SS, Svystonyuk DA, Belke DD, Fedak PWM. Induction of human aortic myofibroblast-mediated extracellular matrix dysregulation: a potential mechanism of fluoroquinolone-associated aortopathy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;157(1):109-19e2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Badal S, Her YF, Maher LJ 3rd. Nonantibiotic effects of fluoroquinolones in mammalian cells. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(36):22287–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Shakibaei M, Pfister K, Schwabe R, Vormann J, Stahlmann R. Ultrastructure of Achilles tendons of rats treated with ofloxacin and fed a normal or magnesium-deficient diet. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44(2):261–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Stahlmann R, Kuhner S, Shakibaei M, Flores J, Vormann J, van Sickle DC. Effects of magnesium deficiency on joint cartilage in immature beagle dogs: immunohistochemistry, electron microscopy, and mineral concentrations. Arch Toxicol. 2000;73(10–11):573–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Tsai WC, Hsu CC, Chen HC, Hsu YH, Lin MS, Wu CW, Pang JH. Ciprofloxacin-mediated inhibition of tenocyte migration and down-regulation of focal adhesion kinase phosphorylation. Eur J Pharmacol. 2009;607(1–3):23–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Li P, Cheng NN, Chen BY, Wang YM. In vivo and in vitro chondrotoxicity of ciprofloxacin in juvenile rats. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2004;25(10):1262–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Williams RJ 3rd, Attia E, Wickiewicz TL, Hannafin JA. The effect of ciprofloxacin on tendon, paratenon, and capsular fibroblast metabolism. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28(3):364–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Zhao B, Chignell CF, Rammal M, Smith F, Hamilton MG, Andley UP, Roberts JE. Detection and prevention of ocular phototoxicity of ciprofloxacin and other fluoroquinolone antibiotics. Photochem Photobiol. 2010;86(4):798–805.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2020CFB720), Hubei Province health and family planning scientific research project (WJ2019F085) and Xiangyang Science and Technology Planning project (2020YL34, 2020YL35).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang, 441000, Hubei, China

    Cui Jun

  2. Department of Pharmacy, Featured Preparations of Vitiligo Xiangyang Key Laboratory, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang, 441000, Hubei, China

    Bian Fang

Authors
  1. Cui Jun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bian Fang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CJ was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. BF was a supervisor in the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bian Fang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflict of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jun, C., Fang, B. Current progress of fluoroquinolones-increased risk of aortic aneurysm and dissection. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 21, 470 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02258-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02258-1

Keywords

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2261

Contact us