Skip to main content

A novel nomogram to predict perioperative acute kidney injury following isolated coronary artery bypass grafting surgery with impaired left ventricular ejection fraction

Abstract

Background and objective

Heart failure (HF) is a global health issue, and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) is one of the most effective surgical treatments for HF with coronary artery disease. Unfortunately, the incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) is high in HF patients following CABG, and there are few tools to predict AKI after CABG surgery for such patients. The aim of this study is to establish a nomogram to predict the incidence of AKI after CABG in patients with impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

Methods

From 2012 to 2017, Clinical information of 1208 consecutive patients who had LVEF< 50% and underwent isolated CABG was collected to establish a derivation cohort. A novel nomogram was developed using the logistic regression model to predict postoperative AKI among these patients. According to the same inclusion criteria and the same period, we extracted the data of patients from 6 other large cardiac centers in China (n = 540) from the China Heart Failure Surgery Registry (China-HFSR) database for external validation of the new model. The nomogram was compared with 3 other available models predicting renal failure after cardiac surgery in terms of calibration, discrimination and net benefit.

Results

In the derivation cohort (n = 1208), 90 (7.45%) patients were diagnosed with postoperative AKI. The nomogram included 7 independent risk factors: female, increased preoperative creatinine(> 2 mg/dL), LVEF< 35%, previous myocardial infarction (MI), hypertension, cardiopulmonary bypass(CPB) used and perioperative blood transfusion. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.738, higher than the other 3 models. By comparing calibration curves and decision curve analyses (DCA) with other models, the novel nomogram showed better calibration and greater net benefit. Among the 540 patients in the validation cohort, 104 (19.3%) had postoperative AKI, and the novel nomogram performed better with respect to calibration, discrimination and net benefit.

Conclusions

The novel nomogram is a reliable model to predict postoperative AKI following isolated CABG for patients with impaired LVEF.

Peer Review reports

Background

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most common cause of heart failure (HF) [1]. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery is invariably recommended for CAD related HF [2]. Impaired LVEF is supposed as a precursor of HF and indicates a poorer prognosis of HF. Additionally, due to difficulty of the surgery and complexity of the perioperative management, some severe complications of CABG in patients with lower LVEF are concerned [3]. Among these complications, acute kidney injury (AKI) has a higher incidence of 12–48% [4,5,6]. Consequently, cardiac dysfunction combined with AKI, also known as postoperative multi-organ dysfunction, is assuredly closely associated with mortality or decreased quality of life [7]. Recently, a number of predictive scoring models for AKI have been established. Some of them are extensively utilized, for instance, Cleveland score [8], Mehta score [9] and Simplified Renal Index (SRI) score [10]. However, these models were designed primarily for all cardiac procedures and were based on old clinical data which was collected decades ago, mainly from western populations. As a result, these models might theoretically present poor performance among patients with impaired LVEF. It is of great clinical importance to establish a risk assessment model for such patients. As a reliable and simplified scoring system, the nomogram predictive model could accurately predict postoperative complications, so as to help in risk control, aiming at reducing the morbidity and mortality. We performed the study to identify independent risk factors for postoperative AKI and develop a nomogram backed by external validation for better clinical evaluation.

Method

From January 2012 to December 2017, all patients (n = 1208) who had an impaired LVEF value (LVEF< 50%, measured by echocardiogram) and underwent a isolated CABG procedure at Fuwai Hospital were enrolled as the derivation cohort. Except for those who were allergic to contrast media or had a relative high SCr(> 2 mg/dL) with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 30–45 ml/min/1.73m2, a contrast-enhanced computerized tomography (CT) scan for aorta was routinely conducted before surgery to screen concomitant aortic anomalies needing surgical correction in the derivation cohort. Detailed information of demographics and perioperative risk factors was collected (Table 1). Based on the KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline [11] for Acute Kidney Injury, AKI was defined as any of the following: increase in serum creatinine (SCr) ≥0.3 mg/dL within 48 h or increase in SCr ≥1.5 times baseline in 7 days or urine volume < 0.5 mL/kg/hour for 6 h.

Table 1 Demographics and risk factors of derivation and validation cohorts

In the derivation cohort (n = 1208), all the possible risk factors were screened by univariate analyses and a logistic regression was performed to select the independent risk factors as predictors. Subsequently, we constructed a nomogram model (Fig. 1) which could predict the probability of postoperative AKI for each individual. By assigning a risk score for each predictor based on its regression coefficient, the nomogram could provide a probability corresponding to the sum of all predictors’ risk scores. The calibration plot was drawn to evaluate the calibration of the model. The AUC and DCA were used to evaluate the discrimination and clinical net benefit of the model. The calibration, discrimination and clinical net benefit of the novel model were compared with the other three prediction models (Cleveland score, Mehta score and SRI score).

Fig. 1
figure1

The novel nomogram score system

We used a data set of 540 patients extracted from the China-HFSR database to externally validate this model. We enrolled patients with impaired LVEFs undergoing isolated CABG during the same period as the derivation cohort. The calibration was evaluated by the calibration plot. AUC and DCA were used to evaluate the discrimination and clinical net benefit.

This study had been approved by institutional review board of Fuwai hospital, Peking union medical college and Chinese academy of medical sciences.

Statistical analysis

All the variables were categorical and presented as frequencies (percentages). For univariate analyses, differences between groups were assessed using chi-square test or Fisher exact test. Factors with P value larger than 0.1 were excluded from the multivariate analysis. A multivariable logistic regression was performed using ‘Enter’ method to construct a nomogram. As mentioned above, calibration was performed using a calibration plot, discrimination was assessed by AUC and DCA was used to evaluate the clinical net benefit. All analyses were performed using the R software, version 3.5, and the SPSS, version 20.0. A two-sided P < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.

Results

The derivation cohort consisted of 1208 patients with a median age of 61 (ranged from 22 to 84) and 174/1208 (14.4%) were female. The validation cohort consisted of 540 patients with a median age of 62 (ranged from 34 to 85) and 83/540 (15.3%) were female. The rate of AKI was 7.5% (90/1208) in the derivation cohort and 19.3% (104/540) in the validation cohort. Demographics and perioperative characteristics of the derivation and validation cohorts were listed in Table 1.

In multivariate analysis, female, SCr > 2 mg/dl, LVEF< 35%, previous MI, hypertension, CPB used and perioperative transfusion were significant predictors for postoperative AKI. All the coefficients and other parameters of the multivariate logistic regression were listed in Table 2. The novel nomogram was developed based on logistic regression (Fig. 1).

Table 2 Coefficents of variables in multivariate logistic regression (the model intercept = −3.9273)

The calibration plots of the novel nomogram and the other three models indicated that the novel nomogram presented better performance in both derivation and validation cohorts (Fig. 2), especially for the patients whose expected AKI probabilities were below 40%.

Fig. 2
figure2

Calibration curves of 4 models in derivation cohort. a The novel nomogram model. b The Cleveland ARF model. c The Mehta model. d The SRI model

The AUCs of the novel nomogram were 0.738 and 0.744 in derivation and validation cohorts. Whereas, in derivation and validation cohorts, the AUCs of Cleveland score were 0.644 and 0.594, 0.595 and 0.529 for Mehta score, 0.596 and 0.634 for SRI score. The ROC curves were presented in Figs. 3 and 4.

Fig. 3
figure3

ROC curves of 4 models in derivation cohort. a The novel nomogram model. b The Cleveland ARF model. c The Mehta model. d The SRI model

Fig. 4
figure4

ROC curves of 4 models in validation cohort. a The novel nomogram model. b The Cleveland ARF model. c The Mehta model. d The SRI model

The DCA curves demonstrated that the novel nomogram also displayed a higher clinical net benefit than the other three models both in derivation and validation cohorts (Figs. 5 and 6).

Fig. 5
figure5

DCA curves of 4 models in derivation cohort

Fig. 6
figure6

DCA curves of 4 models in validation cohort

Discussion

In this multicenter retrospective study, we selected 21 risk factors (Table 1) which were closely associated with prognosis of cardiac surgery and had been incorporated in some outstanding predictive models [3, 12]. We developed and validated a novel nomogram model based on 7 predictors to predict postoperative AKI in isolated CABG patients whose LVEFs were lower than 50%. These 7 significant predictors were female, SCr > 2 mg/dl, LVEF< 35%, previous MI, hypertension, CPB used and perioperative transfusion. Similarly, these 7 selected variables had been proved closely related to renal failure and incorporated in many other famous models [8,9,10]. Unlike the SRI model [10], for the sake of convenience, the novel nomogram included serum creatine (SCr) level instead of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) to exhibit renal function. As we aimed to construct a bedside predictive tool, SCr could be fast accessed and more suitable for bedside use than eGFR though the latter seemed more sensitive. Furthermore, the SCr performed well in our model and was also used in some other robust AKI prediction models [8, 9].

There were some differences between validation and derivation cohorts on demographic and operative risk factors. Given the heterogeneity of different cardiac centers, some predictors, like CPB used which was mostly determined by the operator, varied significantly between derivation and validation cohorts. CPB was used in 648/1208 (53.6%) cases in our center whereas only 70/540 (13%) cases were on-pump CABG in the validation cohort. A Laurie Shroyer et al. [13] conducted a randomized controlled trial (18 centers, n = 2203) which suggested that off-pump CABG led to lower rates of 5-year survival and higher rates of cardiovascular events and repeat CABG. Similarly, Christian H Møller et al. [14] reported a systemic review (86 trials and 10,716 participants) indicating a better long-term survival of on-pump CABG. Although CPB was related to a higher rate of postoperative AKI, it would not alter long-term kidney function compared with off-pump CABG [15]. Therefore, our center preferred an on-pump CABG for its better outcome. Except for CPB used and perioperative transfusion, rates of other predictors incorporated in the novel nomogram did not differ between groups (Table. 2). However, in terms of factors excluded from the model, compared with multi-center data, the baseline data of the patients in our center was characterized by higher incidences of extracardiac arteriopathy, previous cardiac surgery, NYHA III or IV, CCS 4 and non-elective surgery (Table 1). These characteristics indicated greater severity of the primary cardiovascular disease. As while as the multi-center population showed older age, more chronic kidney diseases, more diabetes and PCIs (Table 1). Suggesting that the validation group had more concomitant non-cardiac diseases with milder cardiovascular diseases, and the corresponding incidence of AKI was also higher. The derivation cohort and the validation cohort were retrieved from different populations. The derivation group used single-center data, while the validation group used multi-center data. The difference of baseline data between the derivation and the validation group did not affect the prediction ability of the model itself. Moreover, this model had better predictive performance in the validation group (multi-center and nationwide) than the derivation group with respect to AUC value and clinical net benefit, which further demonstrated the universality of this model.

The rate of AKI was higher in the nationwide multi-center validation cohort (19.3%) than the single-center derivation group (7.5%). The difference might stem from the gaps of therapeutic skills. In spite of this, the novel nomogram performed even better in validation group (AUC = 0.744 versus 0.738 in derivation group) whose AKI rate was significantly higher. The result suggested that the novel nomogram might be more suitable to the population with higher expected AKI rate. The calibration curve (Fig. 2 a) showed that the model might present the most precise prediction when the expected AKI rate was 10–30%.

Although LVEF< 50% and heart failure are two different concepts, they are closely related. We selected cases whose LVEFs were lower than 50% for reasons as follow: 1) Impaired LVEF is a crucial precursor of HF. If a patient without heart failure has a LVEF less than 50%, he or she can easily develop heart failure without timely intervention. 2) LVEF< 50% indicates a poorer prognosis compared with HFpEF (heart failure with preserved LVEF, LVEF≥50%) [16]. 3) The LVEF value measurement is relatively objective and has a good quantitative effect, which could facilitate the selection of patients with higher homogeneity (narrow case-mix) and improve the predictive ability of the derived model. Whereas, the diagnosis of heart failure is based on clinical symptoms and signs, which were usually determined by subjective judgment of clinicians. Patients with impaired EF usually have systolic or diastolic left ventricular dysfunction [16]. Therefore, avoiding AKI should be of greater importance in light of cardiac dysfunction.

Over the past decade, a rapid increasing number of impaired LVEF or heart failure patients have undergone CABG. Chinese CABG Registry [17] and a survey from India [18] have reported that about 10% of all the CABG patients had LVEFs which were less than 50%. AKI affects 12–48% of patients undergoing CABG [6], it contributes to increased mortality and decreased quality of life [19,20,21], especially for those with heart failure or impaired LVEF. Numerous prognostic risk models for AKI requiring renal replacement after cardiac surgery have been introduced into current practices. Unlike other models, we selected AKI (not AKI requiring renal replacement) as our predicting target because of its higher incidence rate and explicit criteria, whereas the dialysis events are rare (1–2%) [22]. Given the more concise and convenient diagnosis of AKI (not renal replacement), earlier prediction and recognition of the mild to moderate AKI seemed profound in postoperative management.

In spite of extensive application of some available predicting models [8,9,10], the benefits of utilizing these risk models might be very limited due to their poor predictive performance in those isolated CABG patients with impaired LVEF as we displayed in our results. Consequently, an accurate and convenient prediction model for AKI after isolated CABG would be invaluable for clinical practices.

The novel nomogram prediction model had demonstrated better predictive performance in calibration, discrimination and net benefit than the other three models. We thought it might be attributed to reasons as followed: (1) Specific for milder AKI. As we mentioned above, milder AKI is more frequent and contributes to several outcomes, making it more valuable for prediction. The other three robust models are for severe AKI requiring dialysis, less suitable for milder AKI. (2) Updated definition of AKI. With the progressive research, the understanding of AKI is also differing from the previous studies. This novel model was according to the latest guidelines for AKI. (3) New data. With the improvement of surgical techniques and perioperative management in recent years, the incidence of surgical complications is gradually reduced. The current widely used models were mostly based on old data of decades ago, which could be outdated. (4) Impaired LVEF. Our model was particularly for isolated CABG patients with impaired LVEF. However, nearly all the existing models were for general cardiac surgery patients, not specific for impaired LVEF. (5) Population heterogeneity. Wessler et al. [23] conducted a research suggesting that clinical prediction models may have variable performance across various databases, especially in many areas of Eastern Europe, Asia, Central America, South America, and Africa where much remains unknown. This is especially important considering the many regional differences in etiology, access to technologies, care systems, and guidelines. Other models were mostly developed on western populations and might be less applicable in Asian or Chinese populations.

Wessler et al. [23] reported a systemic review on 46 different clinical prediction models for cardiac surgery indicating that most models had poorer performance when tested in external validation cohorts and there was a median percentage change in discrimination of − 27.1% (interquartile range, − 49.4%–-5.7%). They thought this was likely the result of differences between the derivation population and the validation population where those models were developed on more highly selected (narrow case-mix) cohorts than they were testing on. Interestingly, in current study, our results demonstrated that the novel nomogram model had improved discrimination (AUC = 7.44 vs 7.38) and higher net benefit (Figs. 5 and 6) in the external validation. We thought the better performance in external validation may be attributable to the less heterogeneity between derivation and validation populations. Concretely, the cases in derivation and validation cohorts were both highly selected with respect to procedure type (isolated CABG without concomitant cardiac or aortic surgical operations), therapeutic era (same period) and technological levels (all the cases were selected from major cardiac centers with similar technological levels in China). In view that the cases of the validation cohort were national-widely recruited from different major cardiac centers and the testing outcome was promising, the novel nomogram model could be more suitable for Chinese or Asian populations than existing available models.

Advantages of this novel model

This novel model only incorporated 7 variables which could be conveniently and noninvasively accessed in daily clinical practice. Therefore, it would be easier to be utilized and worthy for clinical popularizing.

Limitations

Our findings should be interpreted in the context of the study’s limitations. First, our sample size of 1208 patients in derivation cohort and 540 patients in validation cohort was relatively small compared with other robust and widely used models. Second, our derivation cohort was based on a single-center database. Due to some missing data in China-HFSR which was a multi-center database, the model could be hardly derived from the multi-center cohort. Third, for a variety of reasons, data of some patients’ urine tests were not available, therefore factors like proteinuria which was reported related to adverse renal outcomes after CABG [24] failed to be included as potential predictors. Prospective large-scale studies with more detailed data are needed to further verify or update the current results.

Conclusion

The novel nomogram model demonstrated better predictive performance than some widely used models and would be a reliable predictive tool for AKI after isolated CABG.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AKI:

Acute kidney injury

AUC:

Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve

CABG:

Coronary artery bypass graft

CAD:

Coronary artery disease

CCS:

Canadian cardiovascular society

China-HFSR:

China heart failure surgery registry

CPB:

Cardiopulmonary bypass

CT:

Computerized tomography

DCA:

Decision curve analyses

eGFR:

Estimated glomerular filtration rate

HF:

Heart failure

HFpEF:

Heart failure with preserved EF

LVEF:

Left ventricular ejection fraction

MI:

Myocardial infarction

NYHA:

New York heart association

SCr:

Serum creatinine

References

  1. 1.

    Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Masoudi FA, Wilkoff BL. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2013;128(16):E147–239.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    F WSKPA. ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the task force on myocardial revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J. 2014;35(37):78.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Nashef SA, Roques F, Sharples LD, Nilsson J, Smith C, Goldstone AR, Lockowandt U. EuroSCORE II. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;41(4):734–44 discussion 744-735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Hobson CE, Yavas S, Segal MS, Schold JD, Tribble CG, Layon AJ, Bihorac A. Acute kidney injury is associated with increased long-term mortality after cardiothoracic surgery. Circulation. 2009;119(18):2444–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bedside Tool for Predicting the Risk of Postoperative Dialysis in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery. Circulation, 114(21):2208–2216.

  6. 6.

    Oezkur M, Wagner M, Weismann D, Krannich JH, Schimmer C, Riegler C, Rücker V, Leyh R, Heuschmann PU. Chronic hyperglycemia is associated with acute kidney injury in patients undergoing CABG surgery--a cohort study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2015;15:41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Chen SW, Chang CH, Fan PC, Chen YC, Chu PH, Chen TH, Wu VC, Chang SW, Lin PJ, Tsai FC. Comparison of contemporary preoperative risk models at predicting acute kidney injury after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(6):e010176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Thakar CV, Arrigain S, Worley S, Yared JP, Paganini EP. A clinical score to predict acute renal failure after cardiac surgery. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16(1):162–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Mehta RH, Grab JD, O'Brien SM, Bridges CR, Gammie JS, Haan CK, Ferguson TB, Peterson ED. Bedside tool for predicting the risk of postoperative dialysis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Circulation. 2006;114(21):2208–16 quiz 2208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Wijeysundera DN, Karkouti K, Dupuis JY, Rao V, Chan CT, Granton JT, Beattie WS. Derivation and validation of a simplified predictive index for renal replacement therapy after cardiac surgery. JAMA. 2007;297(16):1801–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    None. KDIGO clinical practice guideline, section 2: AKI definition. Kidney Int Suppl. 2012;2(1):19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Shahian DM, O'Brien SM, Filardo G, Ferraris VA, Haan CK, Rich JB, Normand SL, DeLong ER, Shewan CM, Dokholyan RS, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 1--coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88(1 Suppl):S2–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Shroyer AL, Hattler B, Wagner TH, Collins JF, Baltz JH, Quin JA, Almassi GH, Kozora E, Bakaeen F, Cleveland JC Jr, et al. Five-year outcomes after on-pump and off-pump coronary-artery bypass. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(7):623–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Møller CH, Penninga L, Wetterslev J, Steinbrüchel DA, Gluud C. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for ischaemic heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;3(3):Cd007224.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Garg AX, Devereaux PJ, Yusuf S, Cuerden MS, Parikh CR, Coca SG, Walsh M, Novick R, Cook RJ, Jain AR, et al. Kidney function after off-pump or on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Jama. 2014;311(21):2191–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JG, Coats AJ, Falk V, González-Juanatey JR, Harjola VP, Jankowska EA, et al. 2016 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the heart failure association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18(8):891–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Zheng Z, Zhang L, Hu S, Li X, Yuan X, Gao H. Risk factors and in-hospital mortality in Chinese patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: analysis of a large multi-institutional Chinese database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144(2):355–9 359.e351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Varma PK, Kundan S, Ananthanarayanan C, Panicker VT, Pillai VV, Sarma PS, Karunakaran J. Demographic profile, clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting—retrospective analysis of 4,024 patients. Indian J Thor Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;30(4):272–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Parikh CR, Coca SG, Wang Y, Masoudi FA, Krumholz HM. Long-term prognosis of acute kidney injury after acute myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(9):987–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Chen TH, Chang CH, Lin CY, Jenq CC, Chang MY, Tian YC, Hung CC, Fang JT, Yang CW, Wen MS, et al. Acute kidney injury biomarkers for patients in a coronary care unit: a prospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32328.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Lin CY, Tsai FC, Tian YC, Jenq CC, Chen YC, Fang JT, Yang CW. Evaluation of outcome scoring systems for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84(4):1256–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Huen SC, Parikh CR. Predicting acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery: a systematic review. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93(1):337–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wessler BS, Lundquist CM, Koethe B, Park JG, Brown K, Williamson T, Ajlan M, Natto Z, Lutz JS, Paulus JK, et al. Clinical prediction models for Valvular heart disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(20):e011972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Huang TM, Wu VC, Young GH, Lin YF, Shiao CC, Wu PC, Li WY, Yu HY, Hu FC, Lin JW, et al. Preoperative proteinuria predicts adverse renal outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22(1):156–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all China-HFSR investigators and participants for their contributions.

Funding

The source of funding is the 13th Five-year National Science and Technology Major Project of China (2016YFC1300900) which supported the design of the study, and collection, analysis, interpretation of data, and preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LHY analyzed the data and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. THW and CK collected the data. HSS, ZZ and SHS guided the surgery conducting and were in charge of the China-HFRS study. HJF was in charge of the study design and manuscript modification. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianfeng Hou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study had been approved by institutional review board of Fuwai hospital, Peking union medical college and Chinese academy of medical sciences. The written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The permission to access and use the raw data was granted by Prof. Shengshou Hu and from the Fuwai hospital.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1:

Supplemental Appendices.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, H., Hou, J., Tang, H. et al. A novel nomogram to predict perioperative acute kidney injury following isolated coronary artery bypass grafting surgery with impaired left ventricular ejection fraction. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 20, 517 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01799-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • AKI
  • Nomogram
  • Heart failure
  • CABG
  • Prediction model