Skip to main content

Higher fatty liver index is associated with increased risk of new onset heart failure in healthy adults: a nationwide population-based study in Korea



Heart failure (HF) is relatively common cardiovascular disease with high mortality and morbidity. Although it is associated with many cardiovascular risk factors, the association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), the most common chronic liver disease, and HF has not been evaluated in a large-scale cohort study. Thus, we evaluated the ability of the fatty liver Index (FLI), a surrogate marker of NAFLD, to predict the development of HF in healthy individuals.


We analyzed the association between the FLI and new-onset HF with multivariate Cox proportional-hazards models in 308,578 healthy persons without comorbidities who underwent the National Health check-ups in the republic of Korea from 2009 to 2014.


A total of 2532 subjects (0.8%) were newly diagnosed with HF during the study period (a median of 5.4 years). We categorized our subjects into quartile groups according to FLI (Q1, 0–4.9; Q2, 5.0–12.5; Q3, 12.6–31.0; and Q4, > 31.0). The cumulative incidence of HF was significantly higher in the highest FLI group than in the lowest FLI group (Q1, 307 [0.4%] and Q4, 890 [1.2%]; P < 0.001). Adjusted hazard ratio (HRs) indicated that the highest FLI group was independently associated with an increased risk for HF (HR between Q4 and Q1, 2.709; 95% confidence interval = 2.380–3.085; P < 0.001). FLI was significantly associated with an increased risk of new-onset HF regardless of their baseline characteristics.


Higher FLI was independently associated with increased risk of HF in a healthy Korean population.

Peer Review reports


Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common form of chronic liver disease. Its estimated prevalence is about 15–30% in general population [1]. The prevalence of NAFLD has been increasing along with the increase of obesity, insulin resistance and non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, and metabolic syndrome [2]. NAFLD can be found in about 60–70% among obese or diabetic population [1]. There are many studies showing associations between NAFLD and established cardiovascular risk factors including abdominal obesity, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance and high blood pressure [3]. These cardiovascular risk factors are also components of metabolic syndrome. Thus, NAFLD is regarded as the hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome. Moreover, cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death in patients with NAFLD, besides extrahepatic malignancies and liver-related complications [4, 5].

Heart failure (HF) is one of major cardiovascular diseases with higher morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs around the world [6, 7]. The prevalence of HF is approximately 1–2% of the adult population in developed countries and its prevalence is rising among aged people (≥10% among people > 70 years of age) [6, 8]. HF and NAFLD often coexist because they share the same risk factors and a similar pathophysiological processes [9, 10]. HF may cause liver disease, and liver disease may leads to HF in the absence of other cardiovascular risk factors [10].

Although there are several studies with small sample size showing the co-existence of HF and NAFLD [11, 12], they showed the simple association in several cross-sectional studies. We analyzed a large cohort consisting of a healthy Korean adult population without known traditional cardiovascular risk factors and co-morbidities to identify the association of NAFLD and new onset HF.


Data sources

We analyzed National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort 2.0 (NHIS-NSC 2.0) data set. The Korean government has an obligatory public health insurance program, National Insurance Health Service (NIHS), including more than 97% of Korean people are affiliated. Total population (n = 48,222,537) were classified into 2142 classes according to their age, sex, area, eligibility status, and income level. Then, Korean government randomly selected 2.1% of them from each stratum (n = 1,021,208) from 2006 and made NHIS-NSC 2.0. It also included retrospective and prospective follow-up data which was collected from 2002 to 2015 [13]. Because the NHIS covers about 97% of the total population of Korea, the NHIS-NSC 2.0 cohort is expected to represent the entire Korean population.

The cohort includes 4 datasets: the dataset of the sociodemographic information; the dataset of medical claims including information on the diagnosis based on the 10th revision of the International Classification of Disease (ICD-10) codes, admission, and treatment; the dataset of the National Health Screening of the cohort members; and the dataset of the medical institutions. The Korean government recommends the entire Korean adults to take the National Health check-up biennially including questionnaires on medical history and health-related behaviors including smoking status and alcohol consumption, chest X-ray, physical examinations and blood tests. About 72.1% of eligible population had National Health screening programs according to the 2013 NHIS statistics [13]. The cohort also includes mortality data from the death registration database of the Statistics Korea, a central government organization for statistics.

The NHIS-NSC 2.0 is open to any researchers if the NHIS review committee approves study protocol. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea (IRB No. 2019–10-053). Our IRB waived the requirement for informed consent.

Study population

We included population over 20 years of age having National Health check-ups at least one time from 2009 to 2014. We regarded the data from the first check-up as the index data, and the year of the index check-up as the index year. We included all subjects with age ≥ 20 years old and excluded all subjects having pre-specified exclusion criteria. We excluded all patients previously diagnosed with HF. To assess the effect of FLI on the new-onset HF, other exclusion criteria included comorbid conditions that can affect the onset of HF including hypertension, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, cerebrovascular disease, ischemic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, valvular heart disease, chronic kidney disease, and chronic pulmonary disease. We excluded subjects with prescribed medications including oral hypoglycemic, antihypertensive, or lipid-lowering agents within 1 year before the index check-up, subjects with increased blood pressure level above the criteria of hypertension, and elevated fasting blood glucose ≥126 mg/dL at the index check-up. We also excluded factors that can affect FLI including liver disease, and autoimmune disease before the index year. Finally, those with missing data in the index check-up were also excluded.

Definition of HF

The primary outcome of this study was HF incidence according to FLI, and the incidence of HF was defined as the first occurrence during at least 2 different days of hospital visits, at HF admission, or death with a diagnosis of HF. We assessed each diagnosis based on the data from questionnaires, and the 1-year claim data before the index year. When we used the claims data, we defined each diagnosis as the first occurrence during at least two different days of hospital visits (outpatient) or on the first admission, as likely a diagnosis of HF. The presence of HF was defined as those with “HF” according to the ICD-10 disease code in the claim dataset. HF patients who were assigned the following ICD-10 disease codes were considered as: “hypertensive heart disease with HF” (I10.0), “hypertensive heart disease with hypertensive kidney disease with HF” (I13.0),“hypertensive heart disease with hypertensive kidney disease with HF and kidney failure” (I13.2), “ischemic cardiomyopathy” (I25.5), “dilated cardiomyopathy” (I42.0), “cardiomyopathy, unspecified” (I42.9), “cardiomyopathy in diseases classified elsewhere” (I43), “HF” (I50) including “congestive HF” (I50.0), “left ventricular failure” (I50.1), and “HF, unspecified” (I50.9).

Definition/ascertainment of covariates

We calculated body mass index (BMI) with dividing weight (kg) by height (m)-squared. Population with a BMI of ≥25 kg/m2 was regarded as obesity according to the World Health Organization guideline for the Asian population [14]. Smoking status was classified into 3 categories: non-smoker, ex-smoker, and current smoker. Alcohol consumption was evaluated with using standardized self-reporting questionnaires. The questionnaires about alcohol consumption were composed of the questions asking the number of days a week alcohol is consumed, and the amount of alcohol consumed on each drinking day. The amount of alcohol consumption was calculated by multiplying them. The questionnaires about physical activity were composed of the questions asking the number of days a week 30 min of light exercise, 30 min of moderate exercise, and 20 min of vigorous exercise are performed, respectively. Light exercise was assumed to be 2 METs, moderate 3 METs, and vigorous 6 METs, which were multiplied by 20, 30, and 30 min and the respective number of days a week, and summed.

Considering the nation-wide scale of this study, laboratory test cannot be performed in a central facility. Instead, blood samples were analyzed in a number of different institutions which were qualified by an external quality assessment service, annually conducted by Korean Association of External Quality Assessment Service. Data were censored at the time of HF occurrence, disqualification of the NHIS (death or immigration), or the end of the study (December 31th, 2015).

Calculation fatty liver index

We used a well validated, surrogate marker, FLI to identify patients with NAFLD [13]. FLI was calculated with 4 variables (triglycerides [TG], BMI, gamma-glutamyl transferase [GGT], and waist circumference [WC]) with following equation:

$$ \mathrm{FLI}=\left({\mathrm{e}}^{0.953\times \log }{{{{}_{\mathrm{e}}}^{\left(\mathrm{TG}\right)+0.139\times BMI+0.718\times \log}}_{\mathrm{e}}}^{\left(\mathrm{GGT}\right)+0.053\times \mathrm{WC}\hbox{-} 15.745}\right)/\left(1+{\mathrm{e}}^{0.953\times \log }{{{{}_{\mathrm{e}}}^{\left(\mathrm{TG}\right)+0.139\times \mathrm{BMI}+0.718\times \log}}_{\mathrm{e}}}^{\left(\mathrm{GGT}\right)+0.053\times \mathrm{WC}\hbox{-} 15.745}\right)\times 100 $$

The original study showed that the FLI more than 60 as the cutoff for the diagnosis of fatty liver with positive likelihood ratio of 4.3 in general population [15]. Although the FLI is simple to calculate, and easy to screen fatty liver disease, there has been insufficient evidence regarding the diagnosis of fatty liver disease with FLI in Asians because of lower BMI and WC than other ethnic population [16]. Thus, we categorized our study group into quartiles according to their FLI and used quartile group in the statistical analysis.

Statistical analysis

We used continuous variables as mean ± standard deviation and categorical parameters as number with percentage. We performed all statistical analysis with using R software version 3.3.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; Chi-square test and one-way analysis of variance test were used to evaluate statistical differences among the FLI quartiles. The calculation of cumulative event rates according to the FLI quartiles was done with Kaplan-Meier method and compared with a log-rank test. Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for HF incidence were estimated with Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. In the multivariate analysis, we adjusted age and sex in the model 1, and clinical characteristics associated with new onset HF of borderline statistical significance (P < 0.100) along with age and sex in the model 2. We excluded several confounding factors such as hypertension and diabetes because they have significant associations with NAFLD. The inclusion of NAFLD along with these risk factors in the multivariate model might have introduced multicollinearity into the model. We checked the multicollinearity issue by checking the variance inflation factor (VIF) in all models (Supplementary Table 1). Because the VIF levels in the models were less than 10, there was no multicollinearity issue in the models. P values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.


Baseline characteristics of the participants

We analyzed 308,578 subjects after the exclusion of 248,306 subjects who having the pre-specified exclusion criteria. The number of the subjects matching each exclusion criteria was presented in the Fig. 1. We divided our study population into 4 groups according to their FLI quartile values; first quartile (Q1), 0–4.9; second quartile (Q2), 5.0–12.5; third quartile (Q3), 12.6–31.0; and fourth quartile (Q4), > 31.0. The comparison of baseline clinical characteristics and laboratory findings according to the FLI quartiles was summarized in the Table 1. The subjects with higher FLI had a trend to higher age and higher incidence of male. BMI, waist circumference, blood pressures, the amount of alcohol consumption and the proportion of current smoker tended to increase from Q1 to Q4. Fasting glucose, total cholesterol, triglyceride and LDL cholesterol levels were increasing along with the increase of FLI quartiles.

Fig. 1

Overview of the study population

Table 1 Baseline characteristics and laboratory findings

Association between FLI and the incidence of HF

The total follow-up duration of this study cohort was median 5.4 years (interquartile range, 4.1–6.3), 2532 subjects (0.8%) had new onset HF. Table 2 shows the result of univariate analysis of new onset HF. Male gender, older age, higher BMI, higher total cholesterol, TG, and lower HDL cholesterol were associate significantly with new onset HF. Cumulative incidences of new onset HF according to the FLI quartiles were presented in the Fig. 2. The incidence of HF was significantly higher in the subjects with higher FLIs, compared to those with lower FLIs (Q1, 307 [0.4%]; Q2, 543 [0.7%]; Q3, 792 [1.0%]; and Q4, 890 [1.2%], P < 0.001 by the Log-rank test). In multivariate models which were adjusted for age and sex in the model 1 and for clinical characteristics with borderline statistical significance along with age and sex in the model 2, the association between FLI quartile and HF incidence remained statistically significant in each model in the time-dependent Cox proportional hazard analsysis (Table 3). When we used various cutoff-points were tried to categorize the study population, which were suggested by the previous studies (0 ≤ FLI < 30, 30 ≤ FLI < 60, and FLI ≥ 60, by Bedogni et al. [15]; 0 ≤ FLI < 25, 25 ≤ FLI < 35, and FLI ≥ 35 for male, 0 ≤ FLI < 10, 10 ≤ FLI < 20, and FLI ≥ 20 for female, by Yang et al. [17]). Regardless of the cutoff-points used, the highest FLI group had the highest risk for new onset HF (Supplementary Table 2).

Table 2 Univariable analysis of new-onset heart failure
Fig. 2

Cumulative incidence of new onset heart failure according to their quartiles. Statistical significance was determined using the log-rank test

Table 3 Association between fatty liver index and new-onset heart failure

Subgroup analysis

Adjusted HRs according to subgroups summarized in the Fig. 3. FLI was a significant determinant of new onset HF in all subgroups evaluated (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3

Forest plots of hazard ratios for new onset heart failure stratified by various clinical characteristics. CI = confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio


In this study, we showed higher FLI, a well validated index of NAFLD, was associated with increased risk of new onset HF in healthy Korean adult population. In this study, we adopted multivariate models to control several confounding factors such as hypertension and diabetes, which are well-known risk factors for HF. We evaluated more direct associations between NAFLD and HF after exclusion of hypertension and diabetes form the multivariate models. This association was found in most of the subgroups.

The association between fatty liver and HF has been observed in several studies [11, 12], and mildly elevated serum GGT levels in the absence of excessive alcohol consumption were long-term, independent predictors of incident HF in some large population-based studies [18,19,20]. Zhang et al. reported 37 had NAFLD defined by ultrasonography in 102 patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (36.3%) [12]. In the Framingham study, higher GGT level, even within the normal range, had a 1.71-fold risk of HF (95% CI = 1.21–2.41) compared with participants with GGT concentrations less than the median [18]. Also, GGT improved the risk reclassification modestly (net reclassification index, 5.7%; P = 0.01) in the HF prediction [18]. In a prospective cohort study performed in Finland including 18,353 men and 19,726 women who were 25–74 years of age, moderate to high concentrations of serum GGT (from the 50th to the 90th percentiles) were significantly associated with incident HF, and the predictive power was stronger in participants aged < 60 years [20].

The presence of NAFLD was associated with higher BMI and left ventricular (LV) mass index, and had more severe LV fibrosis [12]. Other studies showed that patients with NAFLD had increased LV wall thickness and varying degrees of subclinical LV systolic or diastolic dysfunction [21, 22]. Increased LV wall thickness and fibrosis is a marker of LV diastolic dysfunction regardless of their symptoms. Jung et al. showed mild and moderate to severe NAFLD group had the higher risk of having abnormal LV relaxation compared with normal controls [21]. They showed increased odds ratios for abnormal LV relaxation [mild group: 1.29 (95% confidence interval: 1.15–1.46), moderate to severe group: 1.95 (95% confidence interval: 1.61–2.35)] and increased relative wall thickness (> 0.42) [mild group: 1.26 (95% confidence interval: 1.05–1.52), moderate to severe group: 1.46 (95% confidence interval: 1.08–1.95)] in their cohort having 20,821 Korean adults received health check-ups. The proposed mechanism of increased LV wall thickness include insulin resistance [23], increased renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) [24], and endothelial dysfunction and inflammation [11]. Insulin resistance may contribute to the development of LV hypertrophy and HF through increased renal sodium retention and activation of the sympathetic nervous system [25, 26]. Increased sympathetic nervous system can also increase hepatic fibrosis [27]. Mediators of RAAS, especially angiotensin II and aldosterone, play important roles in the development of hypertension and HF. Also, angiotensin II can be expressed by activated human hepatic stellate cells [24], and activated local RAAS increase hepatic injury and induce fibrosis through angiotensin II-mediated stimulation of fibroblast proliferation and increased release of inflammatory cytokines [28]. Endothelial dysfunction, as a component of inflammation, can increase arterial stiffness and LV afterload through increased vascular tone, sympathetic overactivity, and sodium retention [29]. Inflammation can promote coronary atherosclerosis and increase risk for cardiomyopathy and conduction abnormalities [11]. Inflammatory mediators also affect the progression of fatty liver disease via impaired fatty acid oxidation, increased oxidative stress, and local inflammation [30].

The presence of NAFLD was associated with poor prognosis of chronic HF [31] and acute HF [32]. Although mechanisms of the association between NAFLD and poor clinical outcomes of HF remains unclear, there are several proposed explanations including increased coronary atherosclerosis, enhancing LV hypertrophy and dysfunction, and increased aortic valve calcification [33,34,35]. Because liver plays an important role in the regulation of antioxidant and anti-inflammation systems [36], hepatic dysfunction can increase chronic inflammation and oxidative tissue injury in patient with HF [37] and the impaired antioxidant and antiinflammation roles of liver may further deteriorate the prognosis of HF patients [38].


Our study has several limitations. First, we analyzed only claims data and National Health Screening data without echocardiographic or chemical data. Moreover, we estimated new onset HF by using the NHIS-NSC 2.0 database, which is based on ICD-10 disease code, and the accuracy of HF diagnosis was not validated in this study. If we use echocardiographic data and serum biomarker including B-type natriuretic peptide or N terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide, the diagnosis of HF would be accurate. Further studies should be needed to validate HF patients with health insurance data using either hospital-based medical records. Second, we demonstrated the simple relationship between increased FLI and increased new-onset HF and cannot show other contributable factors in the development of HF because this study is an observational study. Third, we excluded about 45% of the participants in the cohort. This could affect the representativeness and generalizability of our findings. Finally, this study population included only Koreans. Thus, caution should be needed in the generalization of this data to other ethnic populations.


Our findings demonstrated that higher FLI was independently associated with increased risk for HF in healthy Korean population.

Clinical perspectives

Because control of metabolic syndrome and prevention of HF are important in the reduction of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, the identification of increased HF risk may have important public health implications. Further studies are needed to document the effect of management of NAFLD not only on the risk of new onset HF, but also on the reduction of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the National Health Insurance Service of Korea but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of the National Health Insurance Service of Korea.



Body mass index


Fatty liver index


Confidence interval


Gamma-glutamyl transferase


Heart failure


Hazard ratios


International classification of disease


Left ventricle


Metabolic equivalent of task


Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease


National Health Insurance Service


National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort


Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system




Variance inflation factor


Waist circumference


  1. 1.

    Targher G, Day CP, Bonora E. Risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1341–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    McPherson S, Hardy T, Henderson E, Burt AD, Day CP, Anstee QM. Evidence of NAFLD progression from steatosis to fibrosing-steatohepatitis using paired biopsies: implications for prognosis and clinical management. J Hepatol. 2015;62:1148–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Angulo P. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1221–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ekstedt M, Hagstrom H, Nasr P, Fredrikson M, Stal P, Kechagias S, et al. Fibrosis stage is the strongest predictor for disease-specific mortality in NAFLD after up to 33 years of follow-up. Hepatology. 2015;61:1547–54.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Angulo P, Kleiner DE, Dam-Larsen S, Adams LA, Bjornsson ES, Charatcharoenwitthaya P, et al. Liver fibrosis, but no other histologic features, is associated with long-term outcomes of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2015;149:389–97 e10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, et al. 2016 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) developed with the special contribution of the heart failure association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2129–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Lee JH, Kim MS, Kim EJ, Park DG, Cho HJ, Yoo BS, et al. KSHF guidelines for the Management of Acute Heart Failure: part I. definition, epidemiology and diagnosis of acute heart failure. Korean Circ J. 2019;49:1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lee JH, Lim NK, Cho MC, Park HY. Epidemiology of heart failure in Korea: present and future. Korean Circ J. 2016;46:658–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Moller S, Bernardi M. Interactions of the heart and the liver. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:2804–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Xanthopoulos A, Starling RC, Kitai T, Triposkiadis F. Heart failure and liver disease: Cardiohepatic interactions. JACC Heart Fail. 2019;7:87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Anstee QM, Mantovani A, Tilg H, Targher G. Risk of cardiomyopathy and cardiac arrhythmias in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;15:425–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Zhang Z, Wang P, Guo F, Liu X, Luo T, Guan Y, et al. Chronic heart failure in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: prevalence, clinical features, and relevance. J Int Med Res. 2018;46:3959–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lee J, Lee JS, Park SH, Shin SA, Kim K. Cohort profile: the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC). South Korea Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46:e15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Consultation WHOE. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004;363:157–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Bedogni G, Bellentani S, Miglioli L, Masutti F, Passalacqua M, Castiglione A, et al. The fatty liver index: a simple and accurate predictor of hepatic steatosis in the general population. BMC Gastroenterol. 2006;6:33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, Donato KA, Eckel RH, Franklin BA, et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute scientific statement. Circulation. 2005;112:2735–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Yang BL, Wu WC, Fang KC, Wang YC, Huo TI, Huang YH, et al. External validation of fatty liver index for identifying ultrasonographic fatty liver in a large-scale cross-sectional study in Taiwan. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0120443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Dhingra R, Gona P, Wang TJ, Fox CS, D'Agostino RB Sr, Vasan RS. Serum gamma-glutamyl transferase and risk of heart failure in the community. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30:1855–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Wannamethee SG, Whincup PH, Shaper AG, Lennon L, Sattar N. Gamma-glutamyltransferase, hepatic enzymes, and risk of incident heart failure in older men. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012;32:830–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wang Y, Tuomilehto J, Jousilahti P, Salomaa V, Li B, Antikainen R, et al. Serum gamma-glutamyltransferase and the risk of heart failure in men and women in Finland. Heart. 2013;99:163–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Jung JY, Park SK, Ryoo JH, Oh CM, Kang JG, Lee JH, et al. Effect of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease on left ventricular diastolic function and geometry in the Korean general population. Hepatol Res. 2017;47:522–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Trovato FM, Martines GF, Catalano D, Musumeci G, Pirri C, Trovato GM. Echocardiography and NAFLD (non-alcoholic fatty liver disease). Int J Cardiol. 2016;221:275–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Saad MF, Rewers M, Selby J, Howard G, Jinagouda S, Fahmi S, et al. Insulin resistance and hypertension: the insulin resistance atherosclerosis study. Hypertension. 2004;43:1324–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Bataller R, Sancho-Bru P, Gines P, Lora JM, Al-Garawi A, Sole M, et al. Activated human hepatic stellate cells express the renin-angiotensin system and synthesize angiotensin II. Gastroenterology. 2003;125:117–25.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Reaven GM, Hoffman BB. A role for insulin in the aetiology and course of hypertension? Lancet. 1987;2:435–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Soleimani M. Insulin resistance and hypertension: new insights. Kidney Int. 2015;87:497–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Sigala B, McKee C, Soeda J, Pazienza V, Morgan M, Lin CI, et al. Sympathetic nervous system catecholamines and neuropeptide Y neurotransmitters are upregulated in human NAFLD and modulate the fibrogenic function of hepatic stellate cells. PLoS One. 2013;8:e72928.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Warner FJ, Lubel JS, McCaughan GW, Angus PW. Liver fibrosis: a balance of ACEs? Clin Sci (Lond). 2007;113:109–18.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Brandes RP. Endothelial dysfunction and hypertension. Hypertension. 2014;64:924–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Browning JD, Horton JD. Molecular mediators of hepatic steatosis and liver injury. J Clin Invest. 2004;114:147–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Takahashi T, Watanabe T, Shishido T, Watanabe K, Sugai T, Toshima T, et al. The impact of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score on cardiac prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure. Heart Vessel. 2018;33:733–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Valbusa F, Agnoletti D, Scala L, Grillo C, Arduini P, Bonapace S, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and increased risk of all-cause mortality in elderly patients admitted for acute heart failure. Int J Cardiol. 2018;265:162–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Targher G, Byrne CD, Lonardo A, Zoppini G, Barbui C. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and risk of incident cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis. J Hepatol. 2016;65:589–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    VanWagner LB, Wilcox JE, Colangelo LA, Lloyd-Jones DM, Carr JJ, Lima JA, et al. Association of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with subclinical myocardial remodeling and dysfunction: a population-based study. Hepatology. 2015;62:773–83.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Mantovani A, Pernigo M, Bergamini C, Bonapace S, Lipari P, Valbusa F, et al. Heart valve calcification in patients with type 2 diabetes and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Metabolism. 2015;64:879–87.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Valentova M, von Haehling S, Doehner W, Murin J, Anker SD, Sandek A. Liver dysfunction and its nutritional implications in heart failure. Nutrition. 2013;29:370–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Sawyer DB. Oxidative stress in heart failure: what are we missing? Am J Med Sci. 2011;342:120–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Niebauer J, Volk HD, Kemp M, Dominguez M, Schumann RR, Rauchhaus M, et al. Endotoxin and immune activation in chronic heart failure: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 1999;353:1838–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by research fund of Chungnam National University. It contributed to the statistical analysis.

Author information




All of the authors participated in the conception of the study. RJH and PJH: study conception and design, acquisition of data, interpretation of data, drafting of manuscript, and critical revision; LHB: acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data; and YYH, KMS, KYG, PGM, LJH, and SIW: interpretation of data, and critical revision. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae-Hyeong Park.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Institutional Review Board of Chungnam National University Hosptial approved this study protocol (IRB No. 2019–10-053). Our IRB waived the requirement for informed consent because of the retrospective nature of this national cohort and there was no risk of the exposure of personal information of the participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Jae-Hyeong Park serves on the editorial boards as an associated editor of the BMC Cardiovascular Disorders. The other authors have nothing to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1

Supplementary Table 1. Variance inflation factor (VIF) in all models.

Additional file 2

Supplementary Table 2 Association between fatty liver index and new-onset heart failure.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roh, J., Park, J., Lee, H. et al. Higher fatty liver index is associated with increased risk of new onset heart failure in healthy adults: a nationwide population-based study in Korea. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 20, 204 (2020).

Download citation


  • Fatty liver index
  • Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
  • Heart failure
  • Healthy people programs