Skip to main content

The effect of preconditioning with high-intensity training on tissue levels of G-CSF, its receptor and C-kit after an acute myocardial infarction in male rats

Abstract

Background

Exercise training is known as a practical way to increase cardioprotection against stress, and it seems that stem cell recruitment is one of its mechanisms. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of preconditioning with High-intensity interval training (HIIT) on tissue levels of G-CSF, its receptor and C-Kit following acute myocardial infarction in male rats.

Methods

Twenty Male Wistar rats were randomly divided into 4 groups of control, MI, HIIT, and HIIT+MI. Training groups performed 2 weeks of high intensity interval training in 4 sections. The first section consisted training in 3 days and 2 sessions in each day (4 × 2 min with 35–40 m/min and 3 × 2 min with 25–30 m/min between high intervals. The second part included 2 days of training (4 × 2 min with 40 to 45 m/min and 3 × 2 min with 28 to 32 m /min). The third part was performed in 3 days with one more repetition. The fourth section consisted 2 days of training and with one more repetition compared to section 3. For induction of myocardial infarction, subcutaneous injection of isoprenaline was used. CK, total CK, LDH, and troponin T were measured in serum and G-CSF, G-CSFR and C-Kit proteins were measured by the Western Blot method in the heart tissue.

Results

The results of this study showed that enzymes of CK, total CK, LDH, troponin T had a significant increase in both MI and HIIT+MI groups compared to the other two groups (P < 0.001) and these indices in the MI group were significantly higher than the HIIT+MI group. Also, the results demonstrated that G-CSF, G-CSFR and C-Kit protein expression in the heart tissue significantly increased after MI. As well as, 2 weeks of HIIT training significantly increased G-CSF and C-kit in the training group compared to the control group, but the training caused that these proteins does not increase in HIIT+MI group as much as MI group.

Conclusions

Along with other protective pathways, high intensity interval training can increase cardioprotection and decrease heart injuries through the increase in G-CSF, G-CSFR and C-kit level.

Peer Review reports

Background

The heart proper function depends on the delivery of blood and oxygen by the coronary arteries. However, some factors, such as arteriosclerosis or the formation of clots in these vessels lead to an abnormal blood supply and ischemia of the heart muscle, resulting in substantial injury to this sensitive tissue. The mechanisms responsible for ischemic injury are not fully understood. However, numerous studies have shown that several factors, including the reduction of Adenosine triphosphate (ATP), production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), accumulation of hydrogen ions, the production of reactive nitrogen species (RNS), increase of intracellular calcium, calpain activity, and leukocyte activity are involved in cardiac injury [1,2,3,4].

Recent studies have shown that increase of stem cell recruitment factors (such as Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), Stromal cell-derived factor (SDF), Stem cell factor (SCF), and FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (Flt3)), as well as increased stem cells, acts as a protective mechanism of the heart against infarction and improves the function of the left ventricle [5,6,7]. The results show that stem cells are as a novel method to treat heart disease [5,6,7].

Further studies have shown that G-CSF, SDF, SCF, and Flt3 lead to recruitment of stem cells from bone marrow to injured tissue such as the heart. G-CSF is a 25 kDa glycoprotein cytokine that is released from endothelial, macrophages, some of the immune cells (monocytes), and also most of the injured tissues of the body, including the heart, kidneys, pancreas, and even the skeletal muscle [8]. The main function of G-CSF is regulation of proliferation, division and growth of neutrophils and granulocytes in the bone marrow [9]. It seems that after acute myocardial infarction, G-CSF and other factors be able to mobilize stem cells of bone marrow and injured tissue, and regenerate the heart tissue and produce new myocytes [10].

Under normal conditions, the levels of G-CSF and stem cells in the body are negligible [11], but it has been shown that the concentration of these factors changes in various physiological (exercise induced-hypoxia and climbing altitude) and pathological conditions (coronary artery diseases, myocardial infarction, neuroinflammation in traumatic brain injury, …) [12]. De Lisio et al. (2012) reported that 8-weeks continuous endurance training increases stem cell proliferation, which attributed to the acute increase in G-CSF [13]. Baker et al. (2011) showed an increase in G-CSF of skeletal muscle after 10 weeks of endurance training and suggested that this increase is associated with increased serum cytokines [14]. Krüger et al. (2015) reported that one session of resistance training increases the level of G-CSF, which lead to the recruitment of stem cells to damaged skeletal muscle [15].

Several approaches have been identified to achieve cardioprotection against infarction. These strategies include exercise training, ischemic preconditioning, ischemic postconditioning and pharmacological interventions [16]. Regular exposure of the heart to mild IR without cell death during conditions caused by exercise training leads to cardioprotection through the preconditioning process [17, 18]. Also, many studies show cardiovascular, muscular and metabolic adaptations are highly dependent on the intensity of training and the evidence recommended that exercise training intensity is the most critical factor in cardioprotection [19, 20]. The protective role of high-intensity interval training has been accepted during acute injury than other types of training [18]. Since the effect of exercise training on increasing the levels of stem cell recruitment factors has been investigated, and it has also been shown that the levels of stem cells and stem cell recruitment factors increase during acute cardiac injuries, therefore, this research was designed to investigate the protective effect of high-intensity interval training on the axis of the stem cell recruitment factors during cardiac injury.

Methods

Animals and experimental design

In this study, 20 Male Wistar rats with a weight of 224.41 ± 5.1 g (8 weeks old) were purchased from the Pasteur Institute and kept at a temperature of 22 ± 2 °C, relative humidity of 50–55% and a dark-light cycle of 12:12. Animals were randomly divided into 4 groups (5 rats/group) of control, Myocardial infarcted (MI), High-intensity interval training (HIIT), High-intensity interval training+ Myocardial infarcted (HIIT+MI). Forty-eight hours after the last training session, myocardial infarction was induced by 2 times injection of 150 mg/kg isoprenaline solution (24 h interval). One week after induction of infarction, the rats were anesthetized with ketamine (100 mg / kg) and xylazine (10 mg / Kg) and after ensuring from complete and deep anesthesia, the animal’s chest was opened and blood samples were taken from the left ventricle. Finally, the animals under deep anesthesia with ketamine (100 mg / kg) and xylazine (10 mg / Kg) were sacrificed by transcardiac perfusion with PBS followed by 4% paraformaldehyde and then the hearts were removed and frozen rapidly with liquid nitrogen and stored at-80 °C. After the end of the study, the animals were delivered to the animal care center to be destroyed in accordance with the ethical principles of the animal ethics committee of the university of medical sciences.

All methods, including anesthesia and sacrifice procedure were conducted in accordance with the guide for the care and use of laboratory animals, institutes for laboratory animal research, National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No.85–23, revised 1996) and approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of University of Medical Sciences (IR.IUMS.REC1395.28895).

Exercise protocols

In order to familiarize with treadmills, rats in exercise training groups practiced 3 sessions at a speed of 20 m/min for 10 to 15 min (approximately 50% of VO2max) [21, 22]. Then, after 1 day rest, the two-week protocol was performed in the same way as Table 1, which included four sections. The first section consisted 3 days of training, two sessions each day, and each session consisting of 4 × 2 min with the speed of 35–40 m/min (~ 85–85% of vo2max) and 3 × 2 min with slow speeds of 25 to 30 m /min (~ 60–60% vo2max) between two high interval training. The second part included 2 days of training, 4 × 2 min with 40 to 45 m / min (~ 95% -0 to 50% vo2max) and 3 × 2 min slow intervals with 28 to 32 m /min (~ 75% vo2max75). The third part included 3 days of training, including 5 high intervals and 4 slow intervals, and the intensity of this section was similar to the second part. The fourth section consists of 2 days of training, as in the third part, but with 6 high intensity intervals and 5 slow intensity intervals [23].

Table 1 Training protocol

Endurance capacity

In order to ensure the effectiveness of exercise training and measurement of endurance capacity (the highest rate of oxygen consumption attainable during maximal or exhaustive exercise), the maximum exercise performance test was performed at the beginning and the end of the exercise training. The protocol consisted of warm up with intensity of 15 to 25 m/min for 5 min and performance test with the speed and time as shown in Fig. 1 [23]. Exercise performance was determined from a graded exercise test to exhaustion performed at 0% incline, beginning with 10 m/min for 1 min, 11 m/min for 1 min, 12 m/min for 1 min, 13 m/min for 2 min, 15 m/min for 5 min, 17 m/min for 5 min and 20 m/min until exhaustion. Exercise performance was determined by the time to exhaustion. Twice hit with the shock device (electrical stimulus 0.5 mA at the end of the treadmill) at the end of the treadmill in 30 s or reflection of the return and standing upright on the leg were considered as exhaustion [24].

Fig. 1
figure1

The steps of the graded and exhaustion exercise test in order to evaluate of endurance capacity

Induction of myocardial ischemia

For induction of myocardial infarction, subcutaneous injection of Isoprenaline (150 mg/kg) solution in normal salin was performed for two consecutive days (24 h after the first injection, the second injection was performed). The use of this substance in animal models, especially in rats, is one of the common ways to cause infarction [25].

Confirmation of infarction

Blood enzymes creatine kinase (CK), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and troponin T were measured to confirm the injury of the heart tissue. Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining was also used to investigate the necrosis and Mason’s trichrome staining was used to examine the fibrous tissue.

Protein measurement

The G-CSF and G-CSFR (CD114) levels were measured using the Western Blot method. One hundred milligram left ventricular tissue was Lysed and homogenized in the Radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (RIPA buffer) for 30 min, then centrifuged at a temperature of 4 °C at 12,000 rpm for 20 min and the supernatant was separated. Nanodrop evaluation was used to determine the protein concentration. Protein samples were combined equally with a sample buffer (10 ml Tris (PH = 6.8), 12.5 ml Glycerol, 2.5 ml β -mercapto ethanol, 0.01 g Bromo phenol Blue, 25 ml SDS 10%)) and boiled at 100 °C for 7 min. The solution was then exposed to sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-page) 12.5% and the proteins were transferred to the Polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (PVDF membrane). Subsequently, the amounts of these proteins were identified by primary antibodies of G-CSF (England, Biorbyt, orb10702) and G-CSFR (England, Biorbyt, orb13429). Finally, the membrane was incubated with an ECL Western blotting system and exposed to X-ray film. Band density analysis was performed by image j software. Since β-actin is a component of proteins whose expression is constant in the cell [26], the antibody of this protein was used to eliminate the error of loading the equal amounts of protein in the wells.

Statistical analysis

In the present study, the Shapiro-Wilk test was used to determine the normal distribution of data and one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests were used for data analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software. All values were presented as means ± SD and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Serum markers of cellular injury and confirmation of necrosis and fibrous

As shown in Fig. 2, the results of this study showed a significant increase in LDH, CKMB, CK total and troponin-T following 2 weeks of HIIT and infarction (P < 0.001). Tukey’s post hoc test showed that induction of infarction significantly increased these factors in the MI group and HIIT+MI group compared to control and HIIT groups (P < 0.001). Also, the results showed that the exercise training does not increase these cell injury indices in the HIIT+MI group than in the MI group, which indicates the cardioprotection effect of the exercise training. There is also a significant difference in the LDH enzyme between the training group and the control group (p = 0.042).

Fig. 2
figure2

Cell injury markers in experimental groups. Results were presented as means ± SD. a: Blood levels of creatine kinase total (CKtotal ), b: blood levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), c: Blood levels of troponin T (cTI), d: Blood levels of creatine kinase (CK.). * p < 0.001 compared to the control; # p < 0.05 compared to the HIIT, and @ p < 0.001 compared to the HIIT+MI

Mason’s trichrome staining (Fig. 3) and Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining results (Fig. 4) was shown the amount of fibrosis and necrosis in the heart tissue and can confirm the protective effect of exercise training against infarction.

Fig. 3
figure3

The amount of fibrosis in the heart tissue in (a) control group, b HIIT group, c MI group, and (d) HIIT+MI group. The green color represents the amount of tissue fibrosis (× 40 magnification)

Fig. 4
figure4

Necrosis in the heart tissue in (a) control, b HIIT, c MI, and d HIIT+MI groups. Neutrophil accumulation, edema and separation of fibers (Arrows show) (× 40 magnification)

Protein expression

The results of western blot analysis showed that the G-CSF protein had a significant increase after 2 weeks of HIIT and MI (Fig. 5a). Tukey’s post hoc test showed that this protein in the MI group had a significant increase compared to the HIIT (P < 0.001), HIIT+MI (P = 0.042) and control (P < 0.001) groups. Moreover, there was a significant increase in the HIIT (P = 0.019) and HIIT+MI (P < 0.001) groups compared to the control group. Also, there was a significant difference between HIIT+MI and HIIT (P = 0.016).

Fig. 5
figure5

Protein expression in experimental groups (a, b, c, d). a: * p < 0.001 and # p < 0.05 compared to the control group; + p < 0.05 compared to the HIIT+MI. b: * p < 0.001 compared to the control and HIIT groups; # p < 0.01 compared to the control group; + p < 0.05 compared to the HIIT group. c: * p < 0.001 compared to 3 other groups; # p < 0.001compared to 3 other groups. d: Western blot images and comparison of the protein bands of G-CSF, G-CSFR, C-kit with β-actin (as a loading control) between groups. The ratio of these proteins to β-actin expression in experimental groups was shown and described in a, b, c sections

The expression of the G-CSFR was also assessed in four groups using the western blot technique. The result in Fig. 5b shows that the amount of this protein in the MI group has a significant increase compared to the control (P < 0.001) and HIIT (P < 0.001) groups. Also HIIT+MI group has a significant increase compared to the control (P = 0.001) and HIIT (P = 0.004) groups.

The value of C-kit protein in the HIIT and HIIT+MI groups showed a significant increase compared to the control group (P < 0.001). Quantitative results are also seen in Fig. 5c. Also, the C-Kit protein content in the MI group was significantly higher than other groups (P < 0.001).

Endurance capacity

The results of this study showed that 2 weeks of High-intensity interval training significantly increased (P < 0.001) endurance capacity in the two trained groups, which represents the effect of this duration and type of exercise on the endurance capacity in rats. The running distance in the control group was 735 m and the time was 41.5 min at the beginning of the training, which after 2 weeks was 945 m and its time to 48.95 min. Also, the running distance in the MI group changed from 774 m to 976 m and its time changed from 42.75 to 52.85, but the running distance in the training group at the beginning of the training was 760 m and the time was 41.86 min, but after 2 weeks of training, the distance changed to 3400 m and the time to 182.75 min. In the HIIT+MI group, running distance changed from 723 to 3324 m and the time from 40.2 to 170.25 min. These results are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2 Running distance and time spent before and after 2 weeks of HIIT in four research groups

Discussion

Pathological results of the present study showed that injection of isoprenaline causes severe tissue injury to the heart. As shown in Fig. 4, in the MI group, severe pathological changes were created, including edema, neutrophil accumulation, separation of fibers, hemorrhage, and collagen formation in the heart tissue. These findings were similar to the results of Farvin et al. (2010) and Tofighi et al. (2016) studies [27, 28]. LDH, CKMB, CKtotal and troponin-T levels in the MI group increased more than the other three groups, indicating a higher degree of injury in this group. The results of this study were consistent with some studies [29,30,31]. In the present study, it was shown that the level of G-CSF protein and its receptor) G-CSFR) and C-kit in the heart tissue significantly increased in the MI group. Under normal conditions, the amount of stem cells and stem cell mobilizations factors are negligible, but it has been reported that their amounts or activity gets high immediately after ischemia and heart damage, as a body’s inherent protective mechanism [32]. Increasing these factors improves left ventricular function after injury. Possible mechanisms of this event can be attributed to the repair of the heart tissue by the process of vasculogenesis and angiogenesis [33], reduction of cardiac remodeling [34], and triggering of paracrine mechanisms for repairing damaged myocytes and antiapoptotic and antifibrotic signalings [6, 33].

Stem cells and factors requirement of these cells such as G-CSF, SDF, C-kit is one of the signaling pathways of exercise-induced cardiac hypertrophy. The levels of G-CSF and its receptor in various tissues are negligible [8], but the concentration of these factors changes in different physiological conditions, such as ischemia and exercise- induced hypoxia [10, 11]. Baker et al. showed a significant increase in skeletal muscle G-CSF and stem cell after endurance training [14]. The results of Baker et al. study are similar to the present study, which investigated the effect of HIIT on tissue G-CSF concentrations. C-kit in the heart tissue significantly increased in the MI group versus other groups. Increasing the blood level of G-CSF after exercise training was shown in some studies, which can increase the release and mobilization of stem cells from bone marrow and ultimately their migration to the heart, and the differentiation of these cells and increase the physiologic hypertrophy of the heart [35,36,37,38].

Another important effect of exercise training is the increase of the protective ability of various tissues, against probable injuries, such as heart infarction. As the results of this study showed, the level of heart injury indices (LDH، CKMB، CKtotal, troponinT) in the HIIT+IR group was lower than IR group. Also, the level of stem cell recruitment factors that increased during tissue injury, was lower in the HIIT+IR group than the IR group that this also indicates a lower level of injury in the HIIT+IR group. H & E staining results can also confirm the protective effect of exercise training against infarction. The results of this study were similar to some studies, which showed that exercise training increased the tissue protective ability through various mechanisms [29,30,31]. Regular exercise training can increase cardioprotection through anatomical and physiological changes in the coronary arteries, and cellular-molecular mechanisms such as induction of myocardial shock shock (HSPS), increased activity of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), increased endoplasmic endothelial stress (ER), increased levels of ATP-dependent potassium in sarcoloma (sarcoKATP) and mitochondria (mitoKATP), nitric oxide (NO), and increased cardiac antioxidant capacity [39, 40].

The increase in G-CSF induced by physical activity in addition to mobilize stem cell types in different tissues of the body can activate other mechanisms such as inhibition of apoptotic pathways, increased angiogenesis, endothelial regeneration, proliferation and differentiation of the heart cells. The binding of G-CSF to its receptors (G-CSFR) activates the JAK/STAT signaling pathways, Akt and BCL2 and inhibits BAX and caspase-3, and affects the BAX/BCL2 ratio (cell death index), and protects from myocytes by reducing and inhibiting apoptosis [41]. It was reported that the AMI-induced scar tissue area after G-CSF therapy was significantly reduced [42]. Both exercise training and infarction significantly increase the C-kit protein in the heart tissue. The results of this study are similar to the results of the study by Klein et al., which have shown that ischemia in the brain tissue increases the expression of the C-kit [43]. C-kit is a kinase receptor that is required for the proliferation, survival and migration of stem cell types [44] and is recognized as one of the stem cell markers [43]. It has been shown that increasing the expression of the C-kit facilitates the migration of stem cells to the damaged heart tissue by activating the P38 MAPK [45]. It has also been shown that these receptors can protect the heart against various injuries by activating the pathway of Akt and ERK1/2, and even contribute to the repair of the damaged area [46]. Also, a number of studies have reported that changes in the levels of G-CSF and stem cells are not induced as a result of exercise training [21, 22, 47]. The reason for not changing these factors in these studies is probably related to the type and intensity of the exercise training protocols. Because the exercise protocols used in the some of them included self-made and habitual movements [21], some of them were mild walking on treadmill [22] or weightless exercise [10]. Conversely, in researches that show the increase of progenitor cells, has been used high intensity exercise training protocols. Therefore, increasing the level of G-CSF and C-kit in tissues through any physiological agent (exercise, hypoxia,...) can promote cell and tissue growth or protect the tissue against damage.

Conclusions

Regular physical activity can protect the heart against different stresses through various approaches that one of them, which today is paying a lot of attention, is increasing the level of stem cells and stem cell mobilization factors. The results of this study showed that exercise training can reduce cardiac damage caused by acute myocardial infarction and protect the heart by increasing stem cell recruitment factors.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed in the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ATP:

Adenosine triphosphate

CK:

Creatin kinase

Flt3:

FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3

G-CSF:

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor

H&E:

Hematoxylin and eosin staining

HIIT:

High intensity interval training

LDH:

Lactate dehydrogenase

PVDF:

Polyvinylidene difluoride membrane

RIPA:

Radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer

RNS:

Reactive nitrogen species

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

SCF:

Stem cell factor

SDF:

Stromal cell-derived factor

SDS-page:

Sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

References

  1. 1.

    French JP, Quindry JC, Falk DJ, Staib JL, Lee Y, Wang KK, et al. Ischemia-reperfusion-induced calpain activation and SERCA2a degradation are attenuated by exercise training and calpain inhibition. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006;290(1):H128–H36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Hoffman JW Jr, Gilbert TB, Poston RS, Silldorff EP. Myocardial reperfusion injury: etiology, mechanisms, and therapies. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2004;36(4):391–411.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Solaini G, Harris DA. Biochemical dysfunction in heart mitochondria exposed to ischaemia and reperfusion. Biochem J. 2005;390(2):377–94.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Zweier JL, Talukder MH. The role of oxidants and free radicals in reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc Res. 2006;70(2):181–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Harada M, Qin Y, Takano H, Minamino T, Zou Y, Toko H, et al. G-CSF prevents cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction by activating the Jak-Stat pathway in cardiomyocytes. Nat Med. 2005;11(3):305.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Duran JM, Makarewich CA, Sharp TE, Starosta T, Zhu F, Hoffman NE, et al. Bone-derived stem cells repair the heart after myocardial infarction through transdifferentiation and paracrine signaling mechanisms. Circ Res. 2013;113(5):539–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Li N, Wang C, Jia L, Du J. Heart regeneration, stem cells, and cytokines. Regen Med. 2014;2(1):6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Demetri GD, Griffin JD. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and its receptor. Blood. 1991;78(11):2791–808.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Anderlini P, Donato M, Chan KW, Huh Y, Gee A, Lauppe M, et al. Allogeneic blood progenitor cell collection in normal donors after mobilization with filgrastim: the MD Anderson Cancer Center experience. Transfusion. 1999;39(6):555–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Hamamoto M, Tomita S, Nakatani T, Yutani C, Yamashiro S, Sueda T, et al. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor directly enhances proliferation of human troponin I-positive cells derived from idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy through specific receptors. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2004;23(12):1430–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Dawn B, Guo Y, Rezazadeh A, Huang Y, Stein AB, Hunt G, et al. Postinfarct cytokine therapy regenerates cardiac tissue and improves left ventricular function. Circ Res. 2006;98(8):1098–105.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Werner N, Kosiol S, Schiegl T, Ahlers P, Walenta K, Link A, et al. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells and cardiovascular outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(10):999–1007.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    De Lisio M, Parise G. Characterization of the effects of exercise training on hematopoietic stem cell quantity and function. J Appl Physiol. 2012;113(10):1576–84.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Baker J, De Lisio M, Parise G. Endurance exercise training promotes medullary hematopoiesis. FASEB J. 2011;25(12):4348–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Krüger K, Pilat C, Schild M, Lindner N, Frech T, Muders K, et al. Progenitor cell mobilization after exercise is related to systemic levels of G-CSF and muscle damage. Scand J Med Sci Spor. 2015;25(3):e283–e91.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kavazis AN. Exercise preconditioning of the myocardium. Sports Med. 2009;39(11):923–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Frasier CR, Moore RL, Brown DA. Exercise-induced cardiac preconditioning: how exercise protects your achy-breaky heart. J Appl Physiol. 2011;111(3):905–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ramez M, Rajabi H, Ramezani F, Naderi N, Darbandi-Azar A, Nasirinezhad F. The greater effect of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on cardioprotection against ischemia-reperfusion injury through Klotho levels and attenuate of myocardial TRPC6 expression. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019;19(1):118.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Guiraud T, Nigam A, Gremeaux V, Meyer P, Juneau M, Bosquet L. High-intensity interval training in cardiac rehabilitation. Sports Med. 2012;42(7):587–605.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Rognmo Ø, Moholdt T, Bakken H, Hole T, Mølstad P, Myhr NE, et al. Cardiovascular risk of high-versus moderate-intensity aerobic exercise in coronary heart disease patients. Circulation. 2012;112:123117.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Thijssen DH, Vos JB, Verseyden C, Van Zonneveld AJ, Smits P, Sweep FC, et al. Haematopoietic stem cells and endothelial progenitor cells in healthy men: effect of aging and training. Aging Cell. 2006;5(6):495–503.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Wardyn GG, Rennard SI, Brusnahan SK, McGuire TR, Carlson ML, Smith LM, et al. Effects of exercise on hematological parameters, circulating side population cells, and cytokines. Exp Hematol. 2008;36(2):216–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Aboutaleb N, Shamsaei N, Khaksari M, Erfani S, Rajabi H, Nikbakht F. Pre-ischemic exercise reduces apoptosis in hippocampal CA3 cells after cerebral ischemia by modulation of the Bax/Bcl-2 proteins ratio and prevention of caspase-3 activation. J Physiol Sci. 2015;65(5):435–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Judge S, Jang YM, Smith A, Selman C, Phillips T, Speakman JR, et al. Exercise by lifelong voluntary wheel running reduces subsarcolemmal and interfibrillar mitochondrial hydrogen peroxide production in the heart. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2005;289(6):R1564–R72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Patel V, Upaganlawar A, Zalawadia R, Balaraman R. Cardioprotective effect of melatonin against isoproterenol induced myocardial infarction in rats: a biochemical, electrocardiographic and histoarchitectural evaluation. Eur J Pharmacol. 2010;644(1–3):160–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Dolinsky VW, Jones KE, Sidhu RS, Haykowsky M, Czubryt MP, Gordon T, et al. Improvements in skeletal muscle strength and cardiac function induced by resveratrol during exercise training contribute to enhanced exercise performance in rats. J Physiol. 2012;590(11):2783–99.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Farvin K, Surendraraj A, Anandan R. Protective effect of squalene on certain lysosomal hydrolases and free amino acids in isoprenaline-induced myocardial infarction in rats. IJP. 2010;6(2):97–103.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Tofighi A, Ebrahimi Kalan A, Jamali QB. The effect of resveratrol supplementation and aerobic training on cardiac tissue alteration of rats with acute myocardial infarction. Iran J Physiol Pharmacol. 2017;1:211–21.

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Lobo Filho HG, Ferreira NL. Sousa RBd, Carvalho ERd, Lobo PLD, Lobo Filho JG. Experimental model of myocardial infarction induced by isoproterenol in rats. BRAZ J CARDIOV SURG. 2011;26(3):469–76.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Nounou HA, Deif MM, Shalaby MA. Effect of flaxseed supplementation and exercise training on lipid profile, oxidative stress and inflammation in rats with myocardial ischemia. Lipids Health Dis. 2012;11(1):129.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Zaafan MA, Zaki HF, El-Brairy AI, Kenawy SA. Protective effects of atorvastatin and quercetin on isoprenaline-induced myocardial infarction in rats. BULL FAC PHARM CAIRO UNIV. 2013;51(1):35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Goodman JW, Hodgson GS. Evidence for stem cells in the peripheral blood of mice. Blood. 1962;19(6):702–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Beltrami AP, Urbanek K, Kajstura J, Yan S-M, Finato N, Bussani R, et al. Evidence that human cardiac myocytes divide after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(23):1750–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Colter DC, Class R, DiGirolamo CM, Prockop DJ. Rapid expansion of recycling stem cells in cultures of plastic-adherent cells from human bone marrow. PNAS. 2000;97(7):3213–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Sandri M, Adams V, Gielen S, Linke A, Lenk K, Kränkel N, et al. Effects of exercise and ischemia on mobilization and functional activation of blood-derived progenitor cells in patients with ischemic syndromes: results of 3 randomized studies. Circulation. 2005;111(25):3391–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Paulsen G, Benestad HB, Strøm-Gundersen I, MØrkrid L, LappegÅrd KT, Raastad T. Delayed leukocytosis and cytokine response to high-force eccentric exercise. MED SCI SPORT EXER. 2005;37(11):1877–83.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Yamada M, Suzuki K, Kudo S, Totsuka M, Nakaji S, Sugawara K. Raised plasma G-CSF and IL-6 after exercise may play a role in neutrophil mobilization into the circulation. J Appl Physiol. 2002;92(5):1789–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Waring CD, Henning BJ, Smith AJ, Nadal-Ginard B, Torella D, Ellison GM. Cardiac adaptations from 4 weeks of intensity-controlled vigorous exercise are lost after a similar period of detraining. Physiol Rep. 2015;3(2):e12302.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Golbidi S, Laher I. Molecular mechanisms in exercise-induced cardioprotection. Cardiol Res Pract. 2011;2011:15. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/972807.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Quindry JC, Schreiber L, Hosick P, Wrieden J, Irwin JM, Hoyt E. Mitochondrial KATP channel inhibition blunts arrhythmia protection in ischemic exercised hearts. Am J Physiol Heart C. 2010;299(1):H175–H83.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Di Siena S, Gimmelli R, Nori S, Barbagallo F, Campolo F, Dolci S, et al. Activated c-kit receptor in the heart promotes cardiac repair and regeneration after injury. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7(7):e2317.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Orlic D, Kajstura J, Chimenti S, Limana F, Jakoniuk I, Quaini F, et al. Mobilized bone marrow cells repair the infarcted heart, improving function and survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2001;98(18):10344–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Jin K, Mao XO, Sun Y, Xie L, Greenberg DA. Stem cell factor stimulates neurogenesis in vitro and in vivo. J Clin Investig. 2002;110(3):311–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Barrios F, Filipponi D, Campolo F, Gori M, Bramucci F, Pellegrini M, et al. SOHLH1 and SOHLH2 control kit expression during postnatal male germ cell development. J Cell Sci. 2012;125(6):1455–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Balsam LB, Wagers AJ, Christensen JL, Kofidis T, Weissman IL, Robbins RC. Haematopoietic stem cells adopt mature haematopoietic fates in ischaemic myocardium. Nature. 2004;428(6983):668.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Anversa P, Kajstura J, Rota M, Leri A. Regenerating new heart with stem cells. J Clin Investig. 2013;123(1):62–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Bonsignore MR, Morici G, Santoro A, Pagano M, Cascio L, Bonanno A, et al. Circulating hematopoietic progenitor cells in runners. J Appl Physiol. 2002;93(5):1691–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate all those who helped us in this research.

Funding

This work was supported in part by grants from the Iran university of medical sciences (IR.IUMS.REC 1395.28895). The funding bodies were involved in providing primary materials for the data collection and were not involved in data analysis or interpretation and writing the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GHR designed the experiments, collected and analyzed the data; RH contributed in the study design and exercise training; controlled and supervised the stages of the study and revised the manuscript; NF and RF controlled and supervised the stages of the study and revised the manuscript; RM, RF and BM helped to the laboratory tests; RM contributed to the manuscript writing. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript, and agree with the order of presentation of the authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farinaz Nasirinezhad.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was performed according to guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals published by the US National Institutes of Health. All procedures were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR.IUMS.REC1395.28895).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghanimati, R., Rajabi, H., Ramezani, F. et al. The effect of preconditioning with high-intensity training on tissue levels of G-CSF, its receptor and C-kit after an acute myocardial infarction in male rats. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 20, 75 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01380-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Preconditioning
  • High-intensity interval training
  • Cardioprotection
  • Acute myocardial infarction