Skip to main content

Comparison of transthoracic echocardiography with computed tomography in evaluation of pulmonary veins



Transesophageal echocardiography may be used to assess pulmonary veins for atrial fibrillation ablation. No study focused on the role of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in evaluating the diameter and anatomy of pulmonary veins.


Among 142 atrial fibrillation patients (57.7% men; mean age, 60.5) hospitalised for catheter ablation, we assessed pulmonary veins and compared the measurements by TTE with cardiac computed tomography (CT) before ablation. Among 17 patients who had follow-up examinations, the second measurements were also studied.


TTE identified and determined the diameters of 140 (98.6%) right and 140 (98.6%) left superior PVs, and 136 (95.7%) right and 135 (95.1%) left inferior PVs. A separate middle PV ostia was identified in 14 out of the 22 patients (63.6%) for the right side and in 2 out of 4 (50.0%) for the left side. The PV diameters before ablation assessed by CT vs. TTE were 17.96 vs. 18.07 mm for right superior, 15.92 vs. 15.51 mm for right inferior, 18.54 vs. 18.42 mm for left superior, and 15.56 vs. 15.45 mm for left inferior vein. The paired differences between the assessments of CT and TTE were not significant (P ≥ 0.31) except for the right inferior vein with a CT-minus-TTE difference of 0.41 mm (P = 0.018). The follow-up PV diameters by both CT (P ≥ 0.069) and TTE (P ≥ 0.093) were not different from baseline measurements in the 17 patients who had follow-up measurements.


With a better understanding of PV anatomy in TTE imaging, assessing PV diameters by non-invasive TTE is feasible. However, the clear identification of anatomic variation might still be challenging.

Peer Review reports


Atrial fibrillation is one of the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice and associated with increased risk of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity [1, 2], mainly caused by atrial thrombus [3, 4] and irregular tachycardia. Electrical isolation of pulmonary vein (PV) with transcatheter radiofrequency ablation is increasingly applied to treat atrial fibrillation and had a success rate of keeping sinus rhythm ranging from 62 to 90% and reducing cardiovascular morbidity [5, 6]. Accurate assessment on anatomy and variation of the left atrium and PVs is critical to a successful ablation procedure. On the other hand, severe PV stenosis is a major complication after transcatheter ablation, but is commonly ignored [7]. Because of superior spatial resolution and no limitation of acoustic windows, imaging by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance has been widely applied in assessing PV stenosis after ablation [8]. However, cumulative radiation exposure [9], application of nephrotoxic iodine contrast agents during CT scan, claustrophobia during magnetic resonance imaging and the high costs cannot be ignored. Transesophageal echocardiography is an alternative method [10, 11], but still has limitations of the potential risk of oesophageal injury and difficulty for patient tolerance. The non-invasive transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is routinely performed before and after ablation and might be used to visualise the PVs diameters [12, 13]. The aim of this study was to compare TTE with CT in evaluating anatomy and diameters of PVs before and after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.


Study population

Between February 2012 and August 2012, 142 patients had a history of paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation and underwent CT and TTE before atrial fibrillation ablation were enrolled in this study. Patients were excluded if they were younger than 18 years old, or they had hyperthyroidism, congenital heart disease, renal impairment, left atrial appendage thrombus, moderate or severe mitral stenosis or regurgitation, cardiothoracic surgery within 6 months, history of infection within 1 month, or contraindications to oesophageal intubation. All patients underwent clinical examinations, TTE, transesophageal echocardiography, and cardiac CT within 48 h before the ablation procedure. Seventeen of them with recurrent atrial fibrillation had a repeated TTE and cardiac CT at 12 months during the rehospitalisation for a second catheter ablation. The Ethics Committee of Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China, approved the study. All patients gave informed consent.


TTE and transesophageal echocardiography were performed using a Philips iE33 machine (Philips Medical Systems, Eindhoven, Nederland) with a transthoracic (S5–1) and multi-plane transesophageal (S7–2) echocardiographic probes, respectively. TTE included the standard views for measuring left atrium and left ventricular volume and left ventricular ejection fraction using Simpson’s biplane method according to the current guideline [14], and the specific images for assessing pulmonary veins [12, 13]. Colourful and pulsed-wave Doppler imaging was applied as an assistant to localise the PVs. Multiple planes of each view by slight adjustments of the probe were employed to confirm the assessment according to our experience and published methods [12, 13]. In summary, right PVs can be visualised and measured in apical 4-chamber or 5-chamber views or an angle between these two classical views. The inferior right PV is generally perpendicularly jointed to the posterior wall of left atrium, while the superior right PV positions higher and drains into the left atrium (LA) commonly with a tilting angle to the LA posterior-medial wall (Fig. 1). In the parasternal short-axis aortic view, the left superior PV adjoins to the LA appendage angulated to the lateral LA wall. Its inferior counterpart adjoins to descending aorta perpendicular to the posterior wall (Fig. 1). The other views including parasternal long-axis, apical 2-chamber, suprasternal and subcostal were applied to confirm the assessment. In some cases, the extra PV ostia visualised between the superior and inferior veins is identified as the middle PV. For ruling out thrombus in the left atrium or left atrial appendage for the ablation procedure, we routinely performed transesophageal echocardiography after TTE under conscious sedation and oral lidocaine.

Fig. 1

Transthoracic echocardiographic views (a and d) to detect and measure right superior (RSPV, [b]) and inferior (RIPV, [c]) and left superior (LSPV, [e]) and inferior (LIPV, [f]) pulmonary veins. The RSPV and RIPV can be visualised in apical 4-chamber or 5-chamber or between these two classical views (a). The LSPV adjoins to the left atrial appendage and the LIPV to descending aorta in the adjusted parasternal short-axis aortic view (d). Right and left ventricles (RV and LV) and atria (RA and LA), aorta (AO) and pulmonary artery (PA) are marked as references in the views. The diagrams in panels (a and d) were drawn by W-Y.Y. and the echocardiographic images in Panels (b, c, e and f) were recorded by Q-Q.D.

Echocardiographic values were average of three consecutive measurements over 2-s digital loops for patients with atrial fibrillation rhythm and three-beat loops for patients in normal sinus rhythm. The PV diameters were determined at the site of around 5 mm from ostia during left ventricular end-systole. All echocardiographic images were obtained and offline analysed by 2 experienced cardiologists (Y-P.S. and Q-Q.D.) who were blind to the results of cardiac CT. In a subset of 30 patients, the agreements assessed as intraclass coefficient correlation for the four-PV measurements between the two echocardiographers ranged from 0.84 to 0.91 (P < 0.001). The Kappa statistics assessing the intra-observer agreement for detecting any PV variation among these 30 patients was 0.53 (95% CI, 0.08–0.97; P = 0.001).

Computed tomography

We conducted CT scans by using a GE Lightspeed 64 scanner (General Electric Healthcare China, Beijing, China) without heart beat-lowering medication. According to a routine protocol for imaging the PVs, the tube voltage and current were set as 120 kV and 100 mA with a temporal resolution in the range of 185 to 210 ms and a slice thickness of 1.5 mm keeping a 1-mm overlap. Field of view was set to 40 cm. An amount of 100 to 120 mL contrast material (Lopamiro®370 mg I/ml, Shanghai Bracco Sine Pharmaceutical Corp Ltd) was injected via ulnar vein approach at a flow rate of 3.0 to 3.5 mL/s. All raw data of axial imaging were automatically transferred to post-processing workstation (GE Advantage workstation 4.3). By using the multiplanar reconstruction technique, we aimed to assess the maximum diameter in the root of each PV. A cardiologist (G.C.1) who was experienced in cardiac radiology and blinded to the echocardiography results reviewed the post-processed images and measured the maximal diameter of elliptical PVs at the site of around 5 mm from ostia.

Other measurements and catheter procedures

Medical records were reviewed to obtain the medical history and diagnosis of disease and the laboratory results of serum glucose and creatinine. The detailed ablation protocol was previously published [15, 16]. The ablation technique involves radiofrequency isolation of the PV antrum through a transseptal route guided by CARTO mapping (Biosense Webster, Los Angeles, USA). In some proper cases, the superior vena cava and/or coronary sinus were additionally ablated. All procedures were performed by experienced electrophysiologists (S.-W.L., G.C.2 and S.-W.C.) under heparin anticoagulation according to current guideline [17].

Statistical analysis

For statistical analysis, we used SAS software version 9.4 (Cary, North California, USA). All categorical variables were summarised as proportions and continuous variables as mean ± SD, except for the duration of atrial fibrillation, which was reported as geometric means and interquartile range. The duration of atrial fibrillation needed a logarithmic transformation for normal distribution. Paired Student’s t-test and z-test were used for comparisons of continuous variables if proper. Fisher’s exact test was applied for comparisons of categorical variables. The Kappa statistic was used to assess the agreement between TTE and CT in detecting PV anatomic variation. To assess the agreement between CT and TTE measurements of PV diameters, intra-class coefficient correlation and limits of agreement by Bland-Altman approach were computed. Finally, Bland-Altman plotted the PV diameter differences over averaged values of CT and TTE measurements per each individual. Significance was a two-tailed α-level of 0.05 or less.


Characteristics of participants

Table 1 lists the characteristics of the subjects with (n = 17) and without (n = 125) a follow-up examination. All 142 patients aged 60.5 ± 10.1 years underwent TTE and cardiac CT on the same day before PV ablation. Among them, 82 (57.7%) were men and 5 (3.5%) had previous ischemic stroke. The duration of atrial fibrillation was 31.8 months (interquartile range, 12–84). Gender, smoking status, history of hypertension, diabetes, heart failure and age, body mass index and estimated glomerular filtration rate and duration of atrial fibrillation were not different (P ≥ 0.084) between the patients with and without a follow-up examination. Compared with those 125 subjects who did not have the second examination, 17 participants with the follow-up assessment at 12 months (347–372 days) had an increased heart rate (92.5 vs. 81.7 beats/min, P = 0.044) and a higher prevalence of persistent atrial fibrillation (64.7% vs. 24.0%, P = 0.0012) before the first ablation.

Table 1 Characteristics of the participants at first imaging examination

Compared with those 125 subjects did not have a second ablation (Table 2), the 17 patients went through a repeated ablation procedure had larger left atrial diameter (46.2 vs. 41.6), left ventricular end-diastolic (51.2 vs. 48.8) and systolic (34.1 vs. 32.0) dimensions at baseline (P ≤ 0.048). Among these 17 patients, the second measurements of left atrial diameter (42.3 vs. 46.2) and left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (49.4 vs. 51.2) significantly decreased (P ≤ 0.041). The changes of left ventricular end-systolic dimension and ejection fraction did not reach significance (P ≥ 0.29).

Table 2 Comparisons of conventional echocardiographic left atrial and ventricular measurements

Anatomic variations

Among 142 patients, 618 PVs (331 right plus 287 left) were detected during a cardiac CT scan. Twenty-two patients had one (n = 20, 14.1%) or two (n = 2, 1.4%) right middle PVs. Three patients had two (n = 2, 1.4%) or three (n = 1, 0.7%) separate ostia of right superior PV to left atrium. For the right inferior PV, 2 (1.4%) patients had two ostia, 2 (1.4%) patients had three, and 1 (0.7%) patient had four. Left middle PV were observed in 4 patients (2.8%), and the common left PV with joined left superior and inferior PVs to antrum was found in 1 (0.7%) patient. There were 4 patients who had more than 3 right PVs.

No matter with or without additional variations, 140 (98.6%) of right and 140 (98.6%) of left superior PVs, 136 (95.7%) right and 135 (95.1%) left inferior PVs were identified, evaluated and measured for the diameter by TTE. The rest superior or inferior PVs were not visualised because of insufficient acoustic windows or variations in 10 patients. As a variation, the separate middle PV ostia was identified by TTE in 14 out of the 22 patients (63.6%) for the right side and in 2 out of 4 (50.0%) for the left side. Other anatomic variants cannot be clearly identified by using TTE. The Kappa statistic assessing the agreement between TTE and CT in detecting any PV variation was 0.47 (95% CI, 0.29–0.65; P < 0.001).

PV diameter measured by CT vs. TTE at baseline and follow-up

On cardiac CT, PVs and their ostia were generally elliptical in morphology. No matter measured by CT or TTE (Table 3), the superior PVs were bigger than their inferior counterparts (P < 0.001). As showed in Tables 3 and 4, the PV diameters before ablation assessed by CT vs. TTE were 17.96 vs. 18.07 mm for the right superior, 15.92 vs. 15.51 mm for the right inferior, 18.54 vs. 18.42 mm for the left superior, and 15.56 vs. 15.45 mm for the left inferior vein. The paired differences between CT and TTE assessments were not significant (P ≥ 0.31) except for the right inferior vein with a CT-minus-TTE difference of 0.41 mm (P = 0.018). The sensitivity analysis in 109 patients without PV anatomic variant was confirmatory (Table 5). The intraclass coefficient correlation (≥ 0.82) and limits of agreement by Bland-Altman method showed a good agreement between CT and TTE measurements (Fig. 2). However, the paired difference of the individual subjects (Fig. 2) ranged − 7.9 to 4.8 mm for right superior, − 7.8 to 5.0 mm for right inferior, − 4.6 to 6.5 mm for left superior, and − 5.3 to 4.7 mm for left inferior PVs.

Table 3 Comparison of ostial diameters of the superior vs. inferior pulmonary veins by CT and TTE at baseline
Table 4 Measurements of the ostial diameter of pulmonary veins by CT and TTE
Table 5 Baseline measurements of the ostial diameter of pulmonary veins by CT and TTE in 109 patients without anatomic aberrance
Fig. 2

Bland-Altman plots illustrating the diameter differences (CT–TTE) of right superior (a), right inferior (b), left superior (c) and left inferior (d) pulmonary veins (PV) assessed by computed tomography (CT) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). ICC refers to intraclass coefficient correlation. The 95% limits of agreement are presented as ±1.96 SD

During the follow-up (Table 4), the diameters determined by CT vs. TTE were 19.81 vs. 19.21 for right superior (P = 0.0046), 16.76 vs. 15.37 for right inferior (P = 0.0044), 19.75 vs. 19.54 for left superior (P = 0.45), and 15.14 vs. 14.89 for left inferior vein (P = 0.15). Compared with baseline data, the follow-up PV diameters by either CT (P ≥ 0.062) or TTE (P ≥ 0.093) were not different.


The current study is the first observational study to compare the TTE with cardiac CT in assessing of PV anatomic variation and diameters. The key finding was that TTE identified 96.8% PVs and produced comparable measurements of PV diameters to cardiac CT scan before and after PV ablation with a limitation to illustrate the detailed information about PV anatomic variations. The low Kappa statistic assessing the agreement between TTE and CT in detecting PV variation was mainly driven by the 10 middle left or right PVs (7.0%) or other rare variations that were not identified by TTE. In the majority of the patients, with or without variations, 96.8% of overall PVs can be detected and evaluated by TTE. As illustrated in Fig. 3, an experienced echocardiographer can obtain optimal TTE images for assessing PVs in about 4 min per patient after 35 cases of performance. Our study showed that TTE can be used to evaluate PVs before ablation, and can be considered as a potential routine follow-up approach for detecting PV stenosis after ablation.

Fig. 3

Learning curve of obtaining transthoracic echocardiographic images of pulmonary veins (PV). The X axis refers to the first 50 consecutive study patients who had been imaged by one of the echocardiographer (Q-Q.D.). The Y axis presents the average time spent on obtaining the optimal views to measure PVs per five cases

Cardiac CT scan, with a high spatial resolution and no limitation of acoustic windows, is the golden standard tool in assessing PV diameters, morphology and anatomy. The cardiac CT is routinely applied before ablation for atrial fibrillation [17] and can provide accurate diagnosis of the pulmonary vein stenosis [8]. However, cumulative radiation exposure [9] and application of nephrotoxic iodine contrast agents limit the routine use of cardiac CT examination for assessing pulmonary vein stenosis after ablation. As an highly recommended examination during the pre-ablation period to rule out the presence of thrombus in the left atrium and its appendage [17], transesophageal echocardiography can effectively visualise PV diameters, anatomy and the dynamic evaluation of blood flow characteristics in PVs, and therefore provides very important information to identify PV stenosis [10, 11]. Recently, the Role of Transesophageal Echocardiograph Compared to Computed Tomography in Evaluation of Pulmonary Vein Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation (ROTEA) study focused on the comparison of the diameter assessment by transesophageal echocardiography with cardiac CT [11]. Among 43 patients with a mean age of 56 years, To and the coworkers reported that transesophageal echocardiography identified 98% of PVs with obtained adequate Doppler measurement in the pre-ablation study [11]. However, in the studies [18, 19] of 3D transesophageal echocardiography-guided ablation, the feasibility of assessing PV ostia by emerging 3D transesophageal echocardiography was still not confirmatory. In addition, the invasive nature, low tolerance in some patients and risk of oesophageal injury preclude its use as a routine examination after ablation [20]. As far as we know, there was no study compared PV assessment by TTE with cardiac CT scan, invasive angiography or magnetic resonance imaging.

Given the fact that PVs locate far from the probe in the TTE echo window, and the subjective opinion described in the literature and textbooks, the role of TTE on assessing PV anatomy and diameter was usually misunderstood [12, 13]. Conventionally, only right superior or inferior PV is commonly analysed to determine PV flow velocity, mainly for assistant diagnosis of left ventricular diastolic function and mitral regurgitation. By using cardiac catheterisation angiography as a reference, Huang et al. [12] studied 20 adult patients with atrial septal defect hospitalised for interventional closure and described the detail methods to visualise the four PVs. Recently, Gölbaşı and colleagues reported their experience of visualisation of four PVs by using TTE [13]. Based on our experience and these published methods [12, 13], we studied for the first time the role of TTE on analysing PV anatomy and diameter, compared with cardiac CT angiography. In the current study, superior PVs were general bigger in size than its inferior counterparts and 96.8% PVs were visualised and measured by TTE. The PV diameters measured by TTE at baseline and during follow-up were comparable to the CT measurements in the cross-sectional analyses. However, the clear identification of anatomic variation, including existing middle PV and separate ostia of superior and inferior PVs to left atrium might still be challenging in some cases. By using the aforementioned approaches and according to drainage angulation and adjoined anatomic structures, in the majority of the patients, it was not difficult to distinguish between superior and inferior PVs or to identify the superior or inferior PVs even when its counterpart at the same side was not detected. Moreover, confirmatory results of the sensitivity analysis by excluding the patients with any anatomic aberrance detected by cardiac CT imaging indicated that the main findings of the current study were not likely driven by mis-distinguishing the superior, middle or inferior PVs.

The severe PV stenosis (diameter reduction ≥75%) has been considered as a major complication after ablation treatment for atrial fibrillation with life-threatening prognosis if not identified and treated properly [17]. However, in terms of the unspecific clinical manifestation, no guideline-based consensus on the routine follow-up screening of PV stenosis since lack of non-invasive examination methods [17], PV stenosis is usually misdiagnosed. In a previous study, PV diameters significantly decreased after ablation by 0.20 and 0.22 cm similarly as measured by CT and transesophageal echocardiography, respectively, although transesophageal echocardiography underestimated PV ostial diameters for 0.16 to 0.43 cm (p < 0.001) compared with CT except for right superior PV (P = 0.284) [11]. However, in the present study, in 17 cases who had both CT scan and TTE during follow-up, the longitudinal analyses found that there were no changes in PV diameters by both CT (P ≥ 0.069) and TTE (P ≥ 0.093) imaging. Indeed, the ablation was mainly performed in pulmonary antra, not inside pulmonary veins, the PV stenosis decreased from 42% [21] two decades ago to less than 1% around 2010 [22]. However, the rate of severe PV stenosis during 12-month follow-up increased again to 3.1% when the new technology of cyroablation was applied [23]. A non-invasive approach to screen PV stenosis after ablation is still in high demand for daily clinical practice. Although the current follow-up analysis only included 17 patients, the baseline comparison with CT scan can also be reasonably extrapolated for the follow-up examination. Of course, a large prospective study focusing on the follow-up changes of PV diameters by TTE will be warranted.

Our studies should be interpreted with limitations. First, a small number of patients had a follow-up examination. However, the clinical characteristics of those patients were similar to those without a follow-up study, except for the heart rate and proportions of persistent and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Second, our follow-up comparison only included patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation. Recovery of sinus rhythm after ablation may change the haemodynamics and drainage of left atrium and PV to enhance flow volume and velocity [24, 25]. Third, the angulation of PV flow to ultrasonic beam especially when analysing left PVs, precluded the study of PV flow velocity as commonly conducted in transesophageal studies. Finally, the current study only included data from a single centre. The replication from other studies is needed to confirm our findings.


TTE was able to identify 96.8% PVs and yielded the comparable measurements of PV diameters to cardiac CT scan before and after PV ablation. As a non-invasive approach compared with CT and TEE, no x-ray exposure and less time-consuming, transthoracic echocardiography is potentially a routine tool for assisting in PVs evaluation before ablation and for screening stenosis of pulmonary veins after ablation when CT or TEE is not generally indicated. However, caution should be taken to check the PV anatomic variation. On the other hand, larger prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.





Computed tomography


Left atrium


Left inferior


Left superior


Left ventricle


Pulmonary artery


Pulmonary vein


Right atrium


Right inferior


Right superior


Right ventricle


Transthoracic echocardiography


  1. 1.

    Benjamin EJ, Wolf PA, D'Agostino RB, et al. Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death: the Framingham heart study. Circulation. 1998;98:946–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Stewart S, Hart CL, Hole DJ, et al. A population-based study of the long-term risks associated with atrial fibrillation: 20-year follow-up of the Renfrew/Paisley study. Am J Med. 2002;113:359–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Al-Saady NM, Obel OA, Camm AJ. Left atrial appendage: structure, function, and role in thromboembolism. Heart. 1999;82:547–54.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Leithauser B, Park JW. Cardioembolic stroke in atrial fibrillation-rationale for preventive closure of the left atrial appendage. Korean Circ J. 2009;39:443–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Piccini JP, Lopes RD, Kong MH, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009;2:626–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Tzou WS, Marchlinski FE, Zado ES, et al. Long-term outcome after successful catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010;3:237–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Rostamian A, Narayan SM, Thomson L, et al. The incidence, diagnosis, and management of pulmonary vein stenosis as a complication of atrial fibrillation ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014;40:63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Tse HF, Reek S, Timmermans C, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation using transvenous catheter cryoablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation without risk of pulmonary vein stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:752–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA. 2007;298:317–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Stavrakis S, Madden G, Pokharel D, et al. Transesophageal echocardiographic assessment of pulmonary veins and left atrium in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation. Echocardiography. 2011;28:775–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    To AC, Gabriel RS, Park M, et al. Role of transesophageal echocardiography compared to computed tomography in evaluation of pulmonary vein ablation for atrial fibrillation (ROTEA study). J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011;24:1046–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Huang X, Huang Y, Huang T, et al. Individual pulmonary vein imaging by transthoracic echocardiography: an inadequate traditional interpretation. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2008;9:655–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Gölbaşi Z, Cagli K, Özeke Ö, et al. How to image individual pulmonary veins with transthoracic echocardiography. Anatol J Cardiol. 2017;18:304–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's guidelines and standards committee and the chamber quantification writing group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005;18:1440–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Zhou G, Chen S, Chen G, et al. Procedural arrhythmia termination and long-term single-procedure clinical outcome in patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24:1092–100.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Zhao LQ, Zhang GB, Wen ZJ, et al. Common variants predict recurrence after nonfamilial atrial fibrillation ablation in Chinese Han population. Int J Cardiol. 2017;227:360–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:e275–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ottaviano L, Chierchia GB, Bregasi A, et al. Cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation guided by real-time three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography: a feasibility study. Europace. 2013;15:944–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Acena M, Regoli F, Faletra FF, et al. 3D real-time TEE during pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:737–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Hahn RT, Abraham T, Adams MS, et al. Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transesophageal echocardiographic examination: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26:921–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Chen SA, Hsieh MH, Tai CT, et al. Initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating from the pulmonary veins: electrophysiological characteristics, pharmacological responses, and effects of radiofrequency ablation. Circulation. 1999;100:1879–86.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Cappato R, Calkins H, Chen SA, et al. Updated worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010;3:32–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Packer DL, Kowal RC, Wheelan KR, et al. Cryoballoon ablation of pulmonary veins for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: first results of the North American Arctic Front (STOP AF) pivotal trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1713–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ren JF, Marchlinski FE, Callans DJ, et al. Intracardiac Doppler echocardiographic quantification of pulmonary vein flow velocity: an effective technique for monitoring pulmonary vein ostia narrowing during focal atrial fibrillation ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002;13:1076–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ren WD, Visentin P, Nicolosi GL, et al. Effect of atrial fibrillation on pulmonary venous flow patterns: transoesophageal pulsed Doppler echocardiographic study. Eur Heart J. 1993;14:1320–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors gratefully acknowledge all colleagues in the departments of cardiology, echocardiography and radiation medical imaging centre of our hospital for helping the data collection.



Author information




FW and W-YY coordinated the study. Q-QD and W-YY did the analyses. Q-QD, Y-PS and QZ performed echocardiography. Q-QD and QZ did the offline analyses of the echocardiographic images. GC2, S-WC and S-WL performed catheter ablation, screened and enrolled the subjects, and Q-QD and G-QZ collected the clinical information. GC1 analysed the computed tomographic images. QZ collected the laboratory examination information. Q-QD, W-YY and FW wrote the first draft and revised the manuscript. All authors commented on successive drafts of the manuscript and approved the final version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wen-Yi Yang or Fang Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Ethics Committee of Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China, approved the study. All patients gave written consent for the study as well as for procedures of transthoracic echocardiography, computed tomography and pulmonary vein radiofrequency isolation.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dong, Q., Yang, W., Sun, Y. et al. Comparison of transthoracic echocardiography with computed tomography in evaluation of pulmonary veins. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 19, 315 (2019).

Download citation


  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Catheter ablation
  • Transthoracic echocardiography
  • Computed tomography
  • Pulmonary vein