Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Effect of increased left ventricle mass on ischemia assessment in electrocardiographic signals: rabbit isolated heart study

Contributed equally
BMC Cardiovascular DisordersBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:216

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-017-0652-9

Received: 16 February 2017

Accepted: 28 July 2017

Published: 4 August 2017

Abstract

Background

Detailed quantitative analysis of the effect of left ventricle (LV) hypertrophy on myocardial ischemia manifestation in ECG is still missing. The associations between both phenomena can be studied in animal models. In this study, rabbit isolated hearts with spontaneously increased LV mass were used to evaluate the effect of such LV alteration on ischemia detection criteria and performance.

Methods

Electrophysiological effects of increased LV mass were evaluated on sixteen New Zealand rabbit isolated hearts under non-ischemic and ischemic conditions by analysis of various electrogram (EG) parameters. To reveal hearts with increased LV mass, LV weight/heart weight ratio was proposed. Standard paired and unpaired statistical tests and receiver operating characteristics analysis were used to compare data derived from different groups of animals, monitor EG parameters during global ischemia and evaluate their ability to discriminate between unchanged and increased LV as well as non-ischemic and ischemic state.

Results

Successful evaluation of both increased LV mass and ischemia is lead-dependent. Particularly, maximal deviation of QRS and area under QRS associated with anterolateral heart wall respond significantly to even early phase (the 1st-3rd min) of ischemia. Besides ischemia, these parameters reflect increased LV mass as well (with sensitivity reaching approx. 80%). However, the sensitivity of the parameters to both phenomena may lead to misinterpretations, when inappropriate criteria for ischemia detection are selected. Particularly, use of cut-off-based criteria defined from control group for ischemia detection in hearts with increased LV mass may result in dramatic reduction (approx. 15%) of detection specificity due to increased number of false positives. Nevertheless, criteria adjusted to particular experimental group allow achieving ischemia detection sensitivity of 89–100% and specificity of 94–100%, respectively.

Conclusions

It was shown that response of the heart to myocardial ischemia can be successfully evaluated only when taking into account heart-related factors (such as LV mass) and other methodological aspects (such as recording electrodes position, selected EG parameters, cut-off criteria, etc.). Results of this study might be helpful for developing new clinical diagnostic strategies in order to improve myocardial ischemia detection in patients with LV hypertrophy.

Keywords

Myocardial ischemia detectionIncreased left ventricular massElectrogramROC analysisIsolated heartRabbit

Background

Despite the intensive clinical and preclinical research, both morbidity and mortality associated with myocardial ischemia remain high. Diagnosis of myocardial ischemia might be complicated by co-incidence with other diseases, e.g. myocarditis, hypertension or left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. The association between myocardial ischemia and LV hypertrophy has been intensely discussed during the last few decades. Particularly, the studies elucidated such important aspects as mechanisms of development and prevalence of myocardial ischemia in LV hypertrophy patients, specific character of analysis of ECG with ischemia-like patterns recorded in LV hypertrophy patients with and without evidence of myocardial ischemia, and others [13]. Nevertheless, detailed quantitative analysis of effect of LV mass changes on myocardial ischemia manifestation in ECG is still missing. Perhaps the only study, where the need of development of special criteria for ST elevation myocardial infarction in patients with LV hypertrophy was addressed, is study of Armstrong et al. [4]. Significantly different severity of ST elevation was obtained in LV hypertrophy patients (defined by standard voltage ECG criteria) with and without an angiographic culprit lesion. New diagnostic strategy based on standard criteria was proposed to improve specificity of ST elevation myocardial infarction detection (by decrease of false positive diagnoses) without loss of sensitivity.

In cardiovascular research, particular aspects can be successfully studied on animal models, frequently on isolated heart perfused according to Langendorff [5]. Although most of studies have been performed on rat heart [68], rabbit heart is more suitable. It represents optimal compromise between high level of similarity with human (in basic cardiac electrophysiology parameters, including ECG morphology [9], ionic channels distribution, process of repolarization, and calcium handling [10]) typical for big animal models on one side and easy breeding and low cost of small laboratory animals on the other side. Due to above benefits, rabbit is frequently used in ischemia studies [11, 12]. It also represents a suitable model for studying various aspects of LV hypertrophy, since high sensitivity to spontaneous LV hypertrophy (given by significant genetic factor and enhanced response to chronic stress) was previously reported in rabbit [13, 14]. Analogously, in our preliminary work, we reported spontaneous LV mass increase in rabbits [15]. For characterization of LV mass alteration, we introduced the term increased LV mass fraction, since the rabbit hearts did not meet generally accepted criteria of hypertrophy (evident developed structural changes of myocardium together with its electrical remodelling).

This paper presents the comprehensive study, where the effect of increased LV mass fraction on assessment of myocardial ischemia in electrocardiographic signals was addressed for the first time. Particularly, rabbit isolated heart model was used to: a) evaluate suitability of electrogram (EG) parameters for detection of increased LV mass fraction; b) quantify possible effects of increased LV mass fraction on the heart response to ischemia (in terms of onset, magnitude and reversibility of ischemia-induced changes in EG morphology); c) assess an impact of LV mass on efficiency of ischemia detection in EG. Besides the anatomical and electrical characteristics of the heart, the effect of mutual spatial orientation of the heart and electrode system on EG morphology was investigated, too. As a consequence, present work contributes to improving the quality and reliability of ischemia studies on animals and brings new information potentially useful for assessment of increased LV mass and myocardial ischemia.

Methods

Isolated heart preparation

All experiments were carried out with respect to recommendations of the European Community Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and according to the experimental protocol approved by the Committee for Ensuring the Welfare of Experimental Animals, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University.

Sixteen adult New Zealand rabbits (both sexes, weight 2.2–3.45 kg) were included in the study. After premedication (diazepam i.m., 2 mg; heparin i.v., 1000 IU/kg), the rabbits were anaesthetized by mixture of xylazin (i.m., 2 mg/kg) and ketamin (i.m., 60 mg/kg). To prevent ischemia during heart preparation, trachea was cannulated and the animal was artificially ventilated (ventilator for small laboratory animals, World Precision Instruments, USA). Then the chest was opened, heart was rapidly excised and placed into cold (4 °C) Krebs-Henseleit (K-H) solution. The heart was fixed to a Langendorff apparatus and perfused with K-H solution (NaCl, 118 mM; NaHCO3, 24 mM; KCl, 4.2 mM; KH2PO4, 1.2 mM; MgCl2, 1.2 mM; CaCl2, 1.25 mM; glucose, 5.5 mM) aerated by pneumoxyd [16]. The temperature of perfusion solution and the perfusion pressure were maintained at 37 °C and 80 mmHg, respectively.

Electrogram recording and experimental protocol

During the whole experiment, the heart was placed into the bath filled with the K-H solution and three EGs were recorded simultaneously by touch-less method using the orthogonal lead system [17]. It included Ag-AgCl disc electrodes placed in the inner wall of the bath. The signals were amplified by a set of three biological amplifiers DAM50 (World Precision Instruments, USA) and further simultaneously digitized by 16-bit AD converters at a sampling rate of 2000 Hz using a data acquisition multifunction card PCI-6250 (National Instruments, USA).

The experimental protocol consisted of stabilization (25 min long), the rotation of the heart (5 min), global ischemia (induced by cessation of perfusion), and reperfusion (each 10 min long). In stabilization period, the hearts were rotated around their longitudinal axis from 0° to 90° in 10° steps, where 0° was considered as initial heart position in recording system (anterior wall facing forward, see Fig. 1a). EG recorded in each step of rotation included 10–20 QRS complexes. EGs in positions −90° to 0° were subsequently reconstructed using data recorded by lead I and lead II during rotation of the heart within the range 0° to 90° (see Fig. 1b). During ischemia and reperfusion, initial position of horizontal leads was chosen for EGs recording.
Fig. 1

Electrogram recording: a orthogonal system of electrodes on front (left) and top (middle and right) view; b scheme of EG reconstruction in the range from −90° to +90° (black font) using data recorded with two horizontal bipolar leads during the heart rotation from 0° to 90° (grey font); opposite electrodes of the bipolar leads are depicted with grey boxes on top view. LV – left ventricle; L – lead; grey arrow – direction of rotation. Lead III is not shown on top views

Direct assessment of increased LV mass

Before anaesthesia, body weight (BW) of each animal was assessed. Immediately after the isolated heart experiment, the whole heart was weighted (heart weight, HW). Both atria and right ventricle were then separated and LV with septal wall was weighted (LV weight, LVW). Free lateral wall of LV was cut and the wall thickness (LVT) was measured.

To assess spontaneously changed anatomical characteristics of the heart, following indexes were calculated: the heart weight to body weight (HW/BW) ratio, the LV weight to body weight (LVW/BW) ratio and LV weight to heart weight (LVW/HW) ratio. According to the results of retrospective analysis, LVW/HW ratio – representing the LV fraction in the whole heart mass – was the only index suitable for dividing the animals into two groups. The discrimination threshold value of LVW/HW ratio (0.57) was found by analysis of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve [18]. Thus, animals with LVW/HW ratio below or equal threshold were assigned to group L and animals with the ratio above threshold to group H (LVW/HW 0.53 ± 0.03 and 0.61 ± 0.03, respectively; p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test; n = 8 for both groups).

Electrogram parameters calculation

Before EG parameters calculation, the EG segments with artefacts were excluded from the analyses. The low-frequency baseline wander was suppressed using Lynn’s filter with cut-off frequency of 0.5 Hz. After filtering, QRS complexes were automatically detected using wavelet based detector. For representation of particular lead positions (see Fig. 1b), averaged QRS-T were calculated from highly correlated (Spearman’s ρ more than 0.99) subsequent segments. For further processing, the beginnings and the ends of QRS complexes and the end of T wave were detected. Common and newly proposed QRS- and ST-T-related parameters (see Fig. 2) were evaluated in EGs recorded during rotation and during short-term global ischemia and reperfusion in both groups.
Fig. 2

Electrogram parameters calculation: QRSD, QRSA – duration and absolute maximal deviation of QRS, respectively; +AUCQRS, −AUCQRS – area under positive and negative part of QRS, respectively; TA – maximal deviation of T wave; ST20 – level of ST segment 20 ms after QRS offset. Positive and negative parts of QRS also contribute to calculation of area under whole QRS (AUCQRS, not shown) positively and negatively, respectively

Following QRS-related parameters were analysed in each rotation position in stabilization period: QRS duration (QRSD), absolute value of maximal QRS deviation (QRSA), area under whole QRS (AUCQRS, AUC - area under curve; positive and negative parts of QRS contribute to AUC calculation positively and negatively, respectively), and area under positive (+AUCQRS) and negative (−AUCQRS) part of QRS. These parameters were also calculated from EG recorded within the whole ischemia and reperfusion by initially placed lead I and lead II (see above).

Besides abovementioned parameters, level of ST segment at J + 20 ms point (ST20) and maximal deviation of T wave (TA) were calculated. The former was chosen empirically as an alternative to ST60 used in human ECG analysis considering the differences in characteristics (mainly QT and ST-T duration) of human ECG and EG of rabbit isolated heart.

Statistical analysis of data

It was found, that data are not normally distributed (Shapiro-Wilk test). The non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test was then used to test the differences between L and H groups in following data sets: a) EG parameters in different heart positions calculated in stabilization; b) EG parameters calculated from data recorded during ischemia and reperfusion. Additionally, Wilcoxon signed rank test was applied in L and H group separately in order to reveal possible significant changes of the parameters appeared at the end of each minute during ischemia and reperfusion (as compared to stabilization values). Correlation between anatomical characteristics was investigated using Spearman’s correlation coefficient ρ. The ability of different parameters to detect the increased LV mass fraction or/and ischemia-induced EG changes was investigated by ROC analysis. The sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), area under ROC curve (AUCROC), and optimal cut-off point were used to quantify the detection performance. Particularly, AUCROC of 0.5–0.6 and 0.9–1 represents poor and excellent discrimination performance of the parameter, respectively [18]. For all abovementioned tests, p < 0.05 was considered as significant.

Results

Electrophysiological effects of increased LV mass fraction under non-ischemic condition

Courses of averaged QRS complexes calculated for L and H group in various heart positions are shown in Fig. 3. In some positions, morphology of QRS evidently varies among the groups. It corresponds with the results of statistical analysis of QRS-related parameters, where the significant differences between the groups were found in QRSA (in the range of <+0°, +20°>) and in AUCQRS (in the range of <−60°, −30° > and <+10°, +20°>) (see Fig. 4a-b). No significant differences were found in ST-T parameters, including ST20 and T wave polarity (Fig. 4c-d).
Fig. 3

Averaged QRS complexes recorded in hearts with low (L) and high (H) LV mass fraction in the range from −90° to +90° (top). Top views of the heart illustrate the position of bipolar lead during electrogram recording (bottom). LV – left ventricle

Fig. 4

Median values of QRSA (a), AUCQRS (b), ST20 (c), and TA (d) calculated from electrograms recorded in hearts with low (L) and high (H) LV mass fraction in the range from −90° to 90° (* p < 0.05)

Assessment of increased LV mass fraction by EG morphology analysis

Above findings are in accordance with the results of ROC analysis used for evaluation of the ability of different parameters to detect increased LV mass fraction. As seen in Fig. 5a-b, the best diagnostic performance of QRSA and AUCQRS indicated by the highest AUCROC was achieved in the position 0° and −30°, respectively. Corresponding performance indices for QRSA (AUCQRS) were: cut-off point 3.3 mV (−45.3 mV·ms), Se 82% (75%) and Sp 83% (82%). Indices calculated for other parameters were significantly lower within the whole recording range (Fig. 5c-d).
Fig. 5

Receiver operating characteristics curves calculated for QRSA (a), AUCQRS (b), ST20 (c), and TA (d) in the positions −30°, 0°, and 20° (black, green and orange, respectively) for the detection of increased LV mass fraction. AUCROC – area under receiver operating characteristics curve

Electrophysiological effects of ischemia on the hearts with low and high LV mass fraction

Firstly, magnitude and time onsets of ischemia manifestations were evaluated in each group separately. Parameters measured at the end of each minute of ischemia were compared with those from the end of stabilization by paired test. Onsets of significant ischemia-induced changes of different parameters are summarized in Table 1. In all parameters, the increase of the values (with maximal elevation at the end of ischemia) was revealed. Generally, onsets of significant changes in both groups were the same; the earliest prominent changes (already in the 1st minute of ischemia) appeared in QRS parameters, mostly derived from lead II. In case of QRSA and -AUCQRS, the changes were indicated only in lead II. In contrast to QRS parameters, those calculated from ST-T increased significantly only in the second half (the 5th minute or later) of ischemia. In lead I data, ischemia manifestations were generally indicated with 1–2-min delay as compared to lead II. Values of almost all parameters returned to the control level immediately at the beginning of reperfusion. The exceptions were QRSD and ST20 from H group, where ischemia-induced changes disappeared after 3–4 min of perfusion recovery.
Table 1

Onset of significant (p < 0.05) ischemia-induced changes in EG parameters. L, H – hearts with low and high LV mass fraction, respectively; ‘-’ – no significant changes

Parameter

Onset, min

QRSA, AUCQRS, and -AUCQRS (L and H, lead II)

+AUCQRS (L and H, lead I)

1st

QRSD (L and H)

AUCQRS (L and H, lead I)

+AUCQRS (L and H, lead II)

3rd

ST20 and TA (L and H, lead I)

5th

ST20 and TA (H, lead II)

6th

ST20 and TA (L, lead II)

QRSA and -AUCQRS (L and H, lead I)

-

Secondly, the responses of the hearts with unchanged and increased LV mass fraction to myocardial ischemia and reperfusion were compared via comparison (using unpaired test) of parameters measured in both groups during corresponding experimental periods. Significant differences were found in case of QRSD (4th–7th min of ischemia) and AUCQRS and +AUCQRS (5th–10th min of ischemia). In Fig. 6, the distribution of QRSD and AUCQRS in each minute of corresponding experimental period is shown using box plots. It is evident that above differences are due to accentuation of parameters values in H group. No differences were found in values of ST-T parameters during ischemia as well as in all parameters calculated from reperfusion.
Fig. 6

Distribution of QRSD (a) and AUCQRS from lead I (b) in hearts with low (L) and high (H) LV mass fraction during the end of stabilization (ST), ischemia (I) and reperfusion (R) (* p < 0.05). Inside band, top and bottom of boxes indicate median, 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively

Effect of LV mass fraction on myocardial ischemia detection

Above results of paired statistical test are in agreement with those of ROC analysis, which was used to evaluate the overall ability of the parameters to discriminate between non-ischemic and ischemic state. For example, in case of parameters with the earliest response to ischemia (such as QRSA derived from lead II or AUCQRS derived from lead I or lead II in both groups, etc.), AUCROC reaches 0.8 (indicating good discrimination ability) in approx. The 3rd-5th minute of ischemia (see Fig. 7a). For parameters with delayed response to perfusion cessation (e.g. ST20, except for that calculated from lead II in L group), such a good discrimination between non-ischemic and ischemic data can be obtained in approx. The 5th–8th minute of ischemia (see Fig. 7b). In most parameters calculated in both groups, AUCROC increases up to 0.98–1 (perfect discrimination) at the end of ischemia with corresponding Se and Sp of approx. 75% - 90%, even 100% in some cases (similar to abovementioned AUCQRS and ST20, see Fig. 7a-c).
Fig. 7

Area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUCROC) for AUCQRS (a) and ST20 (b) during ischemia; ROC curves for AUCQRS at the end of ischemia (c); distribution of AUCQRS in stabilization (ST) and at the end of ischemia (I) and corresponding discriminating cut-off values (d). L, H, L&H – hearts with low and high LV mass fraction and united group, respectively

The effect of LV mass on criteria and accuracy of myocardial ischemia detection can be illustrated by Se, Sp and cut-off calculated for different experimental groups from corresponding ROC curves. For example, the differences in AUCQRS between groups L and H appearing in approx. The 4th minute of ischemia (see Fig. 6b) are reflected in corresponding courses of AUCROC (L and H in Fig. 7a). Results of ROC curve analysis for lead I AUCQRS calculated at the end of ischemia are summarized in Table 2. As can be seen, the cut-offs used to distinguish between non-ischemic and ischemic data (also depicted with arrows in Fig. 7d) and corresponding Se and Sp (operating points with optimal cut-off value on ROC curves are also depicted with crosses in Fig. 7c) obtained in particular groups are quite different. In particular, the cut-off value in L group is negative, whereas that of H group is positive. Se and Sp in H group reach maximal possible value (100%). Following observations were made from detailed investigation of ROC analysis results.
Table 2

Performance indices of myocardial ischemia detection (the 10th minute of ischemia) using lead I AUCQRS calculated for hearts with low (L) and high (H) LV mass fraction and united group (L&H)

Analysed group

Se, %

Sp, %

Cut-off, mV·ms

Group used for cut-off calculation

L

89

94

−8*

L

H

100

100

39*

H

L&H

94

90

−8*

L&H

L

79

98

39

H

H

100

85

−8

L

L&H

89

99

39

H

Se – sensitivity; Sp – specificity; * – optimal (‘adjusted’) discriminating cut-off derived from ROC curve for corresponding group

Use of L group cut-off (−8 mV·ms) for ischemia detection in the hearts with high LV mass fraction results in prominently decreased Sp (by approx. 15%) as compared to detection based on H group cut-off (39 mV·ms) due to increased number of false positives (see H in Fig. 7d). On the contrary, the cut-off previously calculated from H group data should not be used for ischemia detection in L group because of low Se (only 79%) obtained in this case due to dramatically increased number of false negatives (see L in Fig. 7d).

If data from the hearts with low and high LV mass fraction are analysed together (united group, L&H in Table 2), slightly higher Se (by 5%) and lower Sp (by 4%) are obtained comparing with the indexes calculated for L group using the same cut-off (−8 mV·ms). Decrease of both Se (by 6%) and Sp (by 10%) is indicated in case of united group analysis as compared to evaluation of H group separately using corresponding cut-off (39 mV·ms).

Use of H group cut-off (instead of that calculated from L and H data together) for ischemia detection in united data results in decreasing of Se (by 5%) and increasing of Sp (by 9%) due to increased number of false negatives and decreased number of false positives, respectively (see L&H in Fig. 7d).

Similar tendencies were obtained for +AUCQRS and QRSD.

Discussion

LV mass alteration and its direct assessment

In contrast to the human, where LV mass assessment is generally based on evaluation of LV volume parameters (measured by echocardiographic or magnetic resonance imaging and subsequently normalized to body weight, body surface area, body mass index, or height [1921]), in animal studies, LV mass and other anatomical parameters (e.g. LVW/BW ratio [2224]) can be measured directly. Slight LV mass changes cannot be detected using LVW/BW ratio. Therefore, more sensitive index − the LVW/HW ratio representing the mass fraction of LV in the whole heart mass − was used in this study for evaluation. According to statistical analysis, the LVW/HW ratio is the only index affected with slight increase of LV mass. Normalization of LVW by HW instead of BW seems to be reasonable because of high correlation (Spearman’s ρ) between HW and BW (0.72, p < 0.05), LVW and BW (0.86, p < 0.05) and LVW and HW (0.92, p < 0.01).

Increased LV mass fraction in group H was accompanied by insignificant but clearly visible increase of collagen content (evaluated by Masson trichrome staining) together with decreased tolerance of such myocardium to ischemic insult, as was previously reported [15]. Considering absence of infectious disease (all rabbits used in our study were purchased from certified supplier – Velaz Ltd., Czech Republic – with all appropriate health clarity declarations) and stress insults (animals were handled according to the European Community Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals) and according to previously reported predisposition of the rabbits to spontaneous LV hypertrophy [13, 14], we hypothesize that abovementioned observations are early signs of spontaneously developing LV alteration.

Reliability of EG recording in various heart positions

One of the factors influencing the quality and characteristics of ECG is the mutual orientation of electrode system and the heart which can be affected with the subject’s body position or electrode placement during recording procedure. Clinically significant ST segment deviation and changes of QRS complexes (polarity and relative size of Q, R and S) in standard ECG recorded at right and left-side lying position (comparing with supine) in both healthy and subjects with cardiac disease were reported [25]. The dramatic worsening of detection of ischemia and LV hypertrophy caused by variation in the positioning of chest electrodes was reported as well [26].

In the present study, longitudinal rotation of the heart placed in the bath filled with K-H solution was performed in stabilization in order to obtain EGs from different sites of LV. In both animal groups, no significant “pseudo-ischemic” alterations (such as deviation of ST segment, change of polarity or increase of T wave amplitude, and widening of QRS complex) were found in EGs, including those from initial position of horizontal leads, which is suitable for monitoring the changes in EG morphology caused by global ischemia [27]. Small alterations in ST20 in boundary LV area of H group data (Fig. 4c) were negligible in comparison with ischemia-induced ST deviation observed in both groups (at least 2 mV at the middle of ischemia). Thus, detection of increased LV mass fraction or ischemia in this data should not be affected with the heart orientation.

Ability of EG parameters to detect increased LV mass fraction

It is known that anatomical changes of the heart such as LV hypertrophy produce the changes in ECG morphology including increased amplitude and QRS complex prolongation, QRS patterns associated with the defects of intraventricular conduction and the left axis deviation [1, 28, 29]. Despite relatively low sensitivity of ECG-based LV hypertrophy detection (in the range of 40–60%), electrocardiography is still frequently used for LV hypertrophy screening due to its low cost, easy performance and wide availability [30, 31]. Many electrocardiographic indexes have been proposed for diagnosis of LV hypertrophy in human. Most of them are based on the so-called QRS voltage criteria mainly utilizing S and R peak amplitudes in the decision procedure [1, 31]. Thus, diagnostic performance of these indexes particularly depends on the precision of QRS complexes delineation. However, in clinical as well as experimental data, the detailed delineation of QRS is challenging task, especially in case of EG recorded under variable conditions [32].

This study reports that even slight change of LV size (manifested in neither LVW/BW ratio nor significantly changed structure of myocardium such as in case of developed LV hypertrophy) can be accurately detected using easily calculated EG parameters (without the need of complete delineation of all parts of QRS complex). As in human [1], one of such parameters is QRSA. Nevertheless, AUCQRS seems to be the most sensitive to the changes in electrical activity caused by LV mass fraction increase (see Fig. 5). This is probably due to the method of parameter calculation, where all peaks within the whole QRS complex are taken into account including their polarity. As a result, minor changes in QRS morphology cause significant change of AUCQRS value (compare graphs in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4b). It allows to detect increased LV mass fraction with relatively high Se and Sp (both approx. 82%, see Fig. 5b). However, it should be stressed that higher success of presented approach as compared to clinical diagnostics based on routine ECG is most likely due to experimental, detailed type of analysed data (EG from isolated heart with no effects of neurohumoral regulation and muscle activity, well conductive K-H solution in a space between the heart surface and electrodes instead of conduction inhomogeneity such as in torso, carefully selected electrodes positions, and fixed distance between the heart surface and electrodes to reduce the inter-subject variability). Thus, method for LV hypertrophy assessment in experimental model cannot be easily applied to human data. On the other side, there are certain similarities in observations from both types of data. For example, above finding regarding diagnostic capacity of AUCQRS is in a good agreement with the results of study on ECG recorded in healthy subjects and patients with LV hypertrophy, where significant improvement of diagnostic accuracy was achieved by using voltage-duration product and true time-voltage QRS area instead of common QRS voltages and duration [33]. It should be also noted that areas with high accuracy of increased LV mass fraction detection in rabbit isolated heart electrogram (<−60°,-30° > and <0°, 20°>) correspond roughly with areas usually used for LV hypertrophy detection in human ECG (precordial leads V1, V2, V5, and V6 [1]).

Electrocardiographic detection of myocardial ischemia with respect to LV mass fraction

According to ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF, the earliest ischemia-induced changes in human are reflected in ECG on T wave and ST segment and the changes in QRS complex are generally associated with severe myocardial ischemia (eventually myocardial infarction) [34]. These changes are linked to the region of myocardial ischemia and, thus, can be used to its localizing. In the present study, the model of global myocardial ischemia was used. Although the regional ischemia is in the centre of interest in clinical practice, global ischemia is preferred in studies on rabbit hearts due to its simplicity and high reproducibility regardless of inter-subject differences in anatomy of coronary system and presence of collateral flow [11, 35]. In contrast to the regional ischemia in human, the earliest ischemia-induced changes in the rabbit model are associated with electrical activity during ventricular depolarisation. In both experimental groups, it is mainly reflected in the values of QRS-related parameters extracted from EG recorded with lead oriented approximately through the anterolateral wall of LV (lead II at initial position in Fig. 1). Some data from this area, however, seem to be sensitive to LV mass increase, too (Fig. 4a-b and Fig. 5a-b). If electrophysiological effects of LV mass increase on investigated phenomena (such as developed myocardial ischemia, etc.) are not desired, only parameters resistant to such effects (such as +AUCQRS and -AUCQRS) should be included in the study. Other possible approach is use of data recorded from boundary LV areas (near the initial position of lead I in Fig. 1), where no significant effect of LV mass on the parameters were found (see Fig. 4 for various parameters in stabilization and Fig. 7b for ST20 in ischemia). However, ischemia-induced changes in such case can be revealed with some time delay compared to previous one (see Table 1). Thus, appropriate parameters and/or recording area should be carefully chosen depending on the study goal.

It is worth mentioning, that even recording with leads ‘insensitive’ to LV mass fraction increase in stabilization period does not ensure that EG alterations indicated in ischemia are associated merely with this pathological condition. It is because the influence of LV anatomical change on the heart electrical activity may become apparent during ischemia. This may be explained by certain electrical dissynchrony based on subtle metabolic changes in hearts from H group. Escalation of electric inhomogeneity could be attributed to aggravation of impaired oxygen supply in the heart with slightly increased LV mass by acute ischemic insult. In case of myocardial hypertrophy, impaired supply of oxygen results from increased cardiomyocyte dimensions, perivascular infiltration of coronary arteries, altered secretion of endothelial derived factors, etc. [36, 37]. Inadequate supply of oxygen in such hearts was revealed by ischemic insult only and led to accentuating manifestation of ischemia. Such mechanism might be responsible for significant difference in QRSD and AUCQRS parameters between L and H groups revealed in the middle of ischemia (Fig. 6), though only insignificant structural changes of the myocardium in group H were reported [15].

As mentioned above, this phenomenon may have an impact on ischemia assessment, where the detection accuracy depends directly on discriminating cut-off. Use of unsuitable cut-off (e.g. if its value is calculated from the group different than that being analysed) obviously results in increase of false positive or false negative detections and, consequently, in decrease of Sp or Se (or both) (see Table 2 and Fig. 7d). Reduced quality of ischemia detection is particularly expected, if no attention is paid to LV mass and data derived from L and H groups are analysed together. It results in underestimation of the detection performance as compared to that obtained in L and H group, when the cut-offs ‘adjusted’ to corresponding groups are used. In some cases, adjusted cut-offs provide perfect results with Se and Sp of 100% (H in Table 2). Thus, the cut-off value should be carefully set with regard to the type of analysed data. It is generally in agreement with the studies, where increase of false positive detections due to neglecting of various patient-related factors (e.g. gender, age, LV hypertrophy, etc.) affecting ECG morphology at rest was revealed and adaptation (arising) of ST-segment cut-off was suggested to improve ischemia detection accuracy [34, 38]. Analysis of anatomical peculiarities of the heart may help to reduce number of incorrect detections and avoid confusions in results interpretation.

Conclusions

In this study, it was shown that coincidence of LV mass alteration and myocardial ischemia leads to accentuation of some patterns in ECG, as compared to manifestations of ischemia with any other concomitant pathology. Since this phenomenon is reflected in values of ECG parameters, cut-off based criteria for ischemia detection must be chosen with a caution taking into account anatomical characteristics of LV. Neglecting this aspect may lead to dramatic decrease of ischemia detection accuracy.

Despite experimental character of this study, some methodological aspects and issues addressed (e.g. regarding selection of appropriate ECG parameters and recording electrodes position, method for quantitative evaluation of the effect of altered LV on ischemia detection criteria and detection performance, etc.) can be considered relevant for clinical practice due to similarities in characteristics of rabbit and human heart. Particularly, results of this study might be helpful for improvement of myocardial ischemia detection in patients with LV hypertrophy.

Abbreviations

AUCROC: 

Area under ROC curve

BW: 

Body weight

EG: 

Electrogram

HW: 

Heart weight

LV: 

Left ventricle

LVT: 

LV thickness

LVW: 

LV weight

ROC: 

Receiver operating characteristics

Se: 

Sensitivity

Sp: 

Specificity

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Funding

This work was supported by the grant project of the Czech Science Foundation GAP102/12/2034 and by the project no. LQ1605 from the National Program of Sustainability II (MEYS CR). This work was also written at Masaryk university as part of the projects “Kardiovaskulární systém očima molekulární fyziologie” number MUNI/A/1355/2016 and “Příspěvek biochemických metodik ke studiu molekulární podstaty vybraných patologických stavů a onemocnění” number MUNI/A/1205/2016 with the support of the Specific University Research Grant, as provided by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic in the year 2017.

Authors’ contributions

All authors participated in the design of the study, analysis of the data, interpretation of the results, and review of the manuscript. VO, MN and MR designed the experimental protocol. VO, TS and MN supplied animals. MR, VO, TS, OJ, and JH conducted the experiments. MR, OJ and JH contributed to data processing. MR and JK performed data analysis. MR, VO, TS and MN wrote the manuscript. MH and HP contributed to critical reading of the manuscript and reviewed the literature. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All experiments were carried out with respect to recommendations of the European Community Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and according to the experimental protocol approved by the Committee for Ensuring the Welfare of Experimental Animals, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology
(2)
Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University
(3)
Institute of Anatomy, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague
(4)
Institute of Physiology, Czech Academy of Sciences
(5)
International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne’s University Hospital Brno
(6)
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University

References

  1. Hancock EW, Deal BJ, Mirvis DM, Okin P, Kligfield P, Gettes LS, et al. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram. Part V: electrocardiogram changes associated with cardiac chamber hypertrophy. JACC. 2009;53:992–1002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Otterstad JE. Ischaemia and left ventricular hypertrophy. Eur Heart J. 1993;14:2–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Zehender M, Faber T, Koscheck U, Meinertz T, Just H. Ventricular tachyarrhythmias, myocardial ischemia, and sudden cardiac death in patients with hypertensive heart disease. Clin Cardiol. 1995;18:377–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Armstrong EJ, Kulkarni AR, Prashant DB, Hofmayer KS, MacGregor JS, Stein JC, Kinlay S, Ganz P, McCabe JM. Electrocardiographic criteria for ST-elevation myocardial infarction in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol. 2012;110:977–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Olejnickova V, Novakova M, Provaznik I. Isolated heart models: cardiovascular system studies and technological advances. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2015;53:669–78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Boutros A, Wang J. Ischaemic preconditioning, adenosine and bethanechol protect spontaneously hypertensive isolated rat hearts. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1995;275:1148–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fantinelli JC, Pérez Núnez IA, González Arbeláez LF, Schinella GR, Mosca SM. Participation of mitochondrial permeability transition pore in the effects of ischemic preconditioning in hypertrophied hearts: role of NO and mitoK ATP. Int J Cardiol. 2013;166:173–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kohya T, Kimura S, Meyrburq RJ, Bassett AL. Susceptibility of hypertrophied rat hearts to ventricular fibrillation during acute ischemia. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1988;20:159–68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kaese S, Frommeyer G, Verheule S, van Loon G, Gehrmann J, Breithardt G, et al. The ECG in cardiovascular-relevant animal models of electrophysiology. Herzschrittmachertherapie Elektrophysiol. 2013;2:84–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Bers DM. Cardiac Na/Ca exchange function in rabbit, mouse and man: what’s the difference? J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2002;34:369–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bell RM, Mocanu MM, Yellon DM. Retrograde heart perfusion: the Langendorff technique of isolated heart perfusion. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2011;50:940–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kang C, Brennan JA, Kuzmiak-Glancy S, Garrott KE, Kay MW, Efimov IR. Technical advances in studying cardiac electrophysiology – role of rabbit models. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2016;121:97–109.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Chitty J. Cardiovascular disease in rabbits. Companion Animal. 2015;20:74–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Weber HW, Van der Walt JJ. Cardiomyopathy in crowded rabbits: a preliminary report. S Afr Med J. 1973;47:1591–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hlaváčová M, Olejníčková V, Ronzhina M, Stračina T, Janoušek O, Nováková M, et al. Tolerance of isolated rabbit hearts to short ischemic periods is affected by increased LV mass fraction. In press Accepted by Physiol Res.Google Scholar
  16. Kolářová J, Fialová K, Janoušek O, Nováková M, Provazník I. Experimental methods for simultaneous measurement of action potentials and electrograms in isolated heart. Physiol Res. 2010;59:S71–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kolářová J, Nováková M, Ronzhina M, Janoušek O, Veselý P, Olejníčková V, et al. Isolated rabbit hearts – databases of EGs and MAP signals. Comput Cardiol. 2013:551–4.Google Scholar
  18. Fawcett T. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recogn Lett. 2006;27:861–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Armstrong AC, Gidding S, Gjesdal O, Wu C, Bluemke DA, Lima JAC. LV mass assessed by echocardiography and CMR, cardiovascular outcomes, and medical practice. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2012;5:837–48.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Foppa M, Duncan BB, Rohde LEP. Echocardiography-based left ventricular mass estimation. How should we define hypertrophy? Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2005;3:17.Google Scholar
  21. Lorell BH, Carabello BA. Left ventricular hypertrophy. Pathogenesis, detection, and prognosis. Circulation. 2000;102:470–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. McIntosh MA, Hicks MN, Kane KA, Rankin AC, Cobbe SM. A characterized model of left ventricular hypertrophy in the rabbit. Cardioscience. 1994;5:95–100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Wolk R, Sneddon KP, Dempster J, Kane KA, Cobbe SM, Hicks MN. Regional electrophysiological effects of left ventricular hypertrophy in isolated rabbit hearts under normal and ischaemic conditions. Cardiovasc Res. 2000;48:120–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhao Z, Chen L, Xiao Y-B, Hao J, Tang C-Z, Zheng D-Z. A rabbit model to study regression of ventricular hypertrophy. Heart Lung Circ. 2013;22:373–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Adams MG, Drew BJ. Body position effects on the ECG. J Electrocardiol. 1997;30:285–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Schijvenaars BJA, Kors JA, Herpen G, Kornreich F, Bemmel JH. Effect of electrode positioning on ECG interpretation by computer. J Eectrocardiol. 1997;30:247–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Ronzhina M, Olejníčková V, Janoušek O, Kolářová J, Nováková M, Provazník I. Effects of heart orientation on isolated hearts electrograms. Comput Cardiol. 2013:543–6.Google Scholar
  28. Bacharova L, Szathmary V, Kovalcik M, Mateasik A. Effect of changes in left ventricular anatomy and conduction velocity on the QRS voltage and morphology in left ventricular hypertrophy: a model study. J Electrocardiol. 2010;43:200–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Estes EH, Jacksin KP. The electrogram in left ventricular hypertrophy: past and future. J Electrocardiol. 2009;42:589–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Budhwani N, Patel S, Dwyer EM. Electrocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy: the effect of left ventricular wall thickness, size, and mass on the specific criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy. Am Heart J. 2005;149:709–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Schillaci G, Battista F, Pucci G. A review of the role of electrocardiography in the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension. J Electrocardiol. 2012;45:617–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hejč J, Vítek M, Ronzhina M, Nováková M, Kolářová J. A wavelet-based ECG delineation method: adaptation to an experimental electrograms with manifested global ischemia. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2015;6:364–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Okin PM, Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Pickering TG, Borer JS, Kligfield P. Time-voltage QRS area of the 12-lead electrocardiogram: detection of left ventricular hypertrophy. Hypertension. 1998;31:937–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. JACC. 2012;60:1581–98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Podesser B, Wollenek G, Seitelberger R, Siegel H, Wolner E, Firbas W, Tschabitscher M. Epicardial branches of the coronary arteries and their distribution in the rabbit heart: the rabbit heart as a model of regional ischemia. Anat Rec. 1997;247:521–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Camici PG, Olivotto I, Rimoldi OE. The coronary circulation and blood flow in left ventricular hypertrophy. JMMC. 2012;52:857–64.Google Scholar
  37. Nadruz W. Myocardial remodeling in hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 2015;29:1–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Surawicz B, Tavel M. Stress test. In: Surawicz B, Knilans TK, editors. Chou’s electrocardiography in clinical practice. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2008. p. 221–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement