Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

High levels of serum β2-microglobulin predict severity of coronary artery disease

†Contributed equally
BMC Cardiovascular DisordersBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:71

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-017-0502-9

©  The Author(s). 2017

  • Received: 2 July 2016
  • Accepted: 14 February 2017
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

The identification of new risk factors for coronary artery disease (CAD) is increasingly sought in an effort to tackle this threatening disease. β2-microglobulin (B2M) is reported to associate with peripheral arterial disease and adverse cardiovascular outcomes. However, the association between B2M and cardiovascular disease remains under-researched. This study evaluated the effects of B2M on CAD without renal dysfunction.

Methods

One thousand seven hundred sixty-two subjects (403 non-CAD subjects and 1,359 CAD subjects) were investigated. Fasting samples were collected to determine B2M level. The Gensini and SYNTAX scores were used to assess the severity of CAD.

Results

CAD subjects were significantly higher in serum B2M level comparing with non-CAD subjects (1.25 ± 0.46 vs 1.14 ± 0.28 mg/L, p < 0.001). Serum B2M level was a risk factor of CAD after adjusting potential confounders (Odds Ratio (OR) = 2.363, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.467–3.906, p = 0.001). Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) showed B2M level moderately predicted diagnosis of CAD (the area under the ROC curve (AUC) = 0.608, 95% CI: 0.577–0.639, p < 0.001). Furthermore, serum B2M level was positively associated with Gensini score system, SYNTAX score system and the number of disease vessels (NDV ≥ 2).

Conclusions

The significant association between serum B2M and CAD suggests that B2M could be a biomarker for CAD.

Keywords

  • β2-Microglobulin
  • Severity
  • Coronary artery disease

Background

Coronary artery disease (CAD) has remained the first death burden globally between 2000 and 2012. It was responsible for over 7.4 million deaths in 2012. Although, both genders of all ages may develop CAD, males and the elderly are more vulnerable to death causing by CAD [1, 2]. Quality of life was also remarkably reduced in CAD patients. Nearly a third patients had angina attacks at least once per week [3]. Therefore, there is imperative focus to identify new CAD risk factors. Several biomarkers, such as C-reactive protein [4, 5], natriuretic peptides [6, 7] and sensitive cardiac troponins [8, 9] have been used to predict risk of CAD.

β2-microglobulin (B2M), a low molecular-weight protein (~11,800 Da), is a component of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules on all nucleated cells [10]. Due to the rapid, simple, reliable, and inexpensive measurement of B2M, it is commonly used by clinicians to evaluate conditions such as: dialysis-related amyloidosis [11], human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease [12], myeloma [13], leukemia [14], and collagen disease [15]. B2M has been correlated to inflammatory diseases [16] and is also an estimator of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) [17].

Recent studies have shown that circulating B2M is elevated in accordance with the acuteness of disease in peripheral arterial disease (PAD) patients [18–20]. High levels of serum B2M was also associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with CAD [21, 22]. Aysegul Zumrutdal has reported B2M was positively correlated with the carotid intima-media thickness (C-IMT) in haemodialysis patients [23]. However, there is no confirming evidence of the relationship between serum B2M and the severity of CAD. In this study, we examined the relationship between the concentrations of serum B2M and severity of CAD.

Methods

Study population

Two thousand two-hundred consecutive subjects admitted to a university hospital with the suspected or already documented of CAD (included acute coronary syndrome and stable angina), who underwent selective coronary angiography (CAG) between June 2011 and July 2012, participated as the candidates for study. A self-administered questionnaire was conducted (covering items on demographic, disease history, cigarette and alcohol consumption (defined as one or more alcoholic drink per week)). Diabetes mellitus history was defined as a fasting plasma glucose level > 126 mg/dL, or 2-h post-load blood sugar > 200 mg/dL, or glycated hemoglobin (A1c) ≥ 6.5%, or using anti-diabetic drugs. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥90 mmHg or taking anti-hypertensive medications.

A total of 390 subjects were excluded where blood samples were not measured, or a questionnaire was not completed. 1,810 subjects with serum β2-microglobulin and creatinine levels were selected as candidates for further study. Among them, 48 subjects with creatinine levels of ≥ 115 umol/L were removed to exclude the subjects with possibility of renal dysfunction. Finally, 1,762 subjects were included in this study, with 403 non-CAD subjects (referred to those with normal coronary angiography or vessel stenosis <50%), and 1,359 CAD subjects (those with positive coronary artery angiography and vessel stenosis ≥ 50%). This observational study complied with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by Clinical Research Ethical Committee of Hebei Medical University. All informed consents were signed by participants before conducting.

Laboratory analysis

In all cases, blood samples were drawn following a minimum 12 h overnight fast. All the tests were performed using standard biochemical techniques to determine the following parameters: β2-microglobulin (B2M, mg/L), triglyceride (mmol/L), total cholesterol (mmol/L), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-cholesterol, mmol/L), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-cholesterol, mmol/L), apolipoprotein-A (g/L), apolipoprotein-B (g/L), fasting blood glucose (mmol/L), creatinine (umol/L), blood urea nitrogen (BUN, mmol/L), and uric acid (UA, umol/L).

Coronary angiography

Two experienced interventional cardiologists (M.D. and M.G.K.) measured quantitative coronary angiography using the standard Judkins approach. Both had no knowledge of subjects’ clinical information. Two or more clinicians cross-checked the CAG reports and determined the degree of coronary stenosis according to the American Heart Association standards [24]. Coronary stenosis was determined to be significant at ≥50%. Left anterior descending arteries, left circumflex arteries, and right coronary arteries were measured to determine the number and range of stenotic coronary arteries (SCA) (0 to 3-vessel disease (VD)). 2-VD was independently recorded when coronary stenosis was found in the left main trunk. Stenotic arteries was counted using the scoring systems, Gensini [25] and SYNTAX [26], to determine the extent of CAD.

Statistical analysis

All subjects were categorized into 4 groups according to B2M quartile ranges. Data was presented as the mean ± SD (standard deviation) for scaled measurements or percentages for categorized values. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed for testing continuous data. Kruskal-Wallis test was used for not normally distributed outcomes. Categorical comparison was tested through Chi-square test. Pearson correlations and Spearman correlations were performed to determine statistically significant factors into multiple regression model. Biologically relevant factors were also selected into multiple regression model to exam the association between B2M and CAD as well as B2M and Gensini score or SYNTAX score. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to assess the prediction accuracy of CAD by B2M. Statistically significance was set as P < 0.05. All the statistical analyses were conducted by Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software (version 12 for Windows, SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Characteristics of the study subjects

One thousand seven hundred sixty-two subjects were eligible for the study (403 non-CAD subjects and 1,359 CAD subjects). CAD subjects were elder than non-CAD subject (58.60 ± 9.59 vs 55.65 ± 9.68, p < 0.001). More males were observed in the CAD subjects (70.6% vs 47.8%, p < 0.001). The prevalence of smoking, drinking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in CAD subjects was higher than non-CAD subjects (Table 1). CAD subjects also had a higher value of creatinine concentrations, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), uric acid (UA), triglyceride, apolipoprotein-A and apolipoprotein-B. B2M levels were significantly lower in non-CAD subjects (1.14 ± 0.28 vs 1.25 ± 0.46 mg/L, p < 0.001; Fig. 1a).
Table 1

Clinical and biochemical characteristics of the study subjects

 

Non-CAD (n = 403)

CAD (n = 1,359)

p-value

Age (years)

55.65 ± 9.68

58.60 ± 9.59

<0.001

Gender (male, %)

47.8

70.6

<0.001

Smoking (%)

18.9

39.4

<0.001

Drinking (%)

15.9

25.8

<0.001

Hypertension (%)

47.8

63.5

<0.001

Diabetes (%)

9.2

19.4

<0.001

AMI (%)

1.2

7.6

<0.001

HF (%)

0.5

0.7

0.992

SBP

131.54 ± 18.56

133.44 ± 21.22

0.108

DBP

81.29 ± 12.08

81.15 ± 20.89

0.378

HR (bpm)

68.04 ± 14.68

70.49 ± 13.08

0.008

Creatinine (umol/L)

66.58 ± 15.25

71.2 ± 15.3

<0.001

BUN (mmol/L)

5.25 ± 4.2

6.38 ± 18.96

<0.001

UA (umol/L)

285.44 ± 137.57

306.84 ± 179.28

<0.001

Glu

7.44 ± 31.96

6.48 ± 18.86

<0.001

TG (mmol/L)

1.6 ± 1.01

2 ± 5.19

0.002

TC (mmol/L)

4.36 ± 1.83

4.67 ± 11.29

0.424

HDL-C (mmol/L)

1.49 ± 5.22

1.09 ± 0.45

0.000

LDL-C (mmol/L)

2.58 ± 0.77

2.95 ± 9.76

0.055

Apo-A (g/L)

1.37 ± 0.27

1.3 ± 0.71

<0.001

Apo-B (g/L)

0.88 ± 0.25

1.15 ± 4.9

<0.001

B2M (mg/L)

1.14 ± 0.28

1.25 ± 0.46

<0.001

Gensini score

0.5 ± 1.69

39.34 ± 34.66

<0.001

CAD coronary artery disease, AMI acute myocardial infarction, HF heart failure, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, HR heart rate, BUN blood urea nitrogen, UA uric acid, Glu blood glucose, TG Triglycerides, TC total cholesterol, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, Apo-A Apolipoprotein A, Apo-B Apolipoprotein B, B2M β2-microglobulin. Data are means ± SD

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

B2M levels between patients with CAD (n = 1,359) and those without CAD (n = 403). a Comparison of serum B2M levels in non-CAD vs CAD. b Comparison of serum B2M levels according to the number of stenotic coronary arteries (NVD = 0, 1, 2, and 3)

All 1,762 subjects were also categorized into 4 groups based on B2M quartile ranges (Additional file 1: Figure S1): 1st quartile (<1.00 mg/L), 2nd quartile (1.00-1.17 mg/L), 3rd quartile (1.18-1.35 mg/L), and 4th quartile (>1.35 mg/L). To eliminate the possibility of renal dysfunction, subjects only in the normal range of creatinine were included (Additional file 2: Figure S2). As shown in Table 2, we compared the main baseline demographic, clinical and angiographic characteristics between the four quartiles. There was an increasing in B2M level with aging (p < 0.001). Significant measurements were also included drinking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, myocardial infarction, baseline apolipoprotein-A, HDL-C, creatinine, uric acid (UA) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (Table 2).
Table 2

Baseline clinical and angiographic features based on quartiles of B2M

Characteristics

Quartile 1

Quartile 2

Quartile 3

Quartile 4

p-value

≤1.00 (mg/L) n = 472

1.00–1.17(mg/L) n = 443

1.18–1.35(mg/L) n = 431

>1.35(mg/L) n = 416

Baseline clinical features

 Age (years)

53.85 ± 9.44

56.49 ± 9.12

60.38 ± 8.53

61.58 ± 9.55

<0.001

 Gender (male, %)

63.0

68.7

65.8

63.9

0.285

 Smoker (%)

33.3

38.3

34.9

32.0

0.242

 Drinker (%)

25.5

28.0

21.7

18.3

0.005

 Hypertension (%)

52.9

59.0

61.3

67.7

<0.001

 Diabetes (%)

15.2

16.0

15.5

22.1

0.022

 AMI (%)

3.6

5.9

8.5

6.9

0.018

 HF (%)

0.4

0.5

0.9

0.7

0.751

Baseline blood features

 TG (mmol/L)

1.86 ± 1.33

2.01 ± 5.09

2.12 ± 7.51

1.64 ± 1.03

0.228

 TC (mmol/L)

4.39 ± 0.99

4.42 ± 1.01

4.39 ± 1.88

5.26 ± 20.39

0.044

 HDL-C (mmol/L)

1.14 ± 0.49

1.38 ± 4.98

1.1 ± 0.33

1.09 ± 0.58

0.000

 LDL-C (mmol/L)

2.65 ± 0.82

2.74 ± 0.92

2.62 ± 0.85

3.49 ± 17.6

0.295

 Apo-A (g/L)

1.31 ± 0.29

1.41 ± 1.15

1.27 ± 0.26

1.25 ± 0.38

<0.001

 Apo-B (g/L)

1.25 ± 6.59

1.19 ± 5.19

0.94 ± 0.4

0.94 ± 0.36

0.730

 Creatinine (umol/L)

64.13 ± 13.68

68.48 ± 13.12

71.36 ± 15.56

77.4 ± 16.13

<0.001

 BUN (mmol/L)

5.78 ± 14.45

5.15 ± 1.26

6.89 ± 19.98

6.74 ± 23.13

<0.001

 UA (umol/L)

272.97 ± 76.96

299.38 ± 88.34

300.06 ± 120.89

338.75 ± 301.73

<0.001

Angiographic features

 CAD (%)

68.1

75.7

79.1

86.1

<0.001

 Severe CADa (%)

29.4

46.5

52.2

82.2

<0.001

 Number of stenotic arteries

   

<0.001

  0 (%)

37.2

27.1

22.3

21.7

 

  1 (%)

26.6

28.0

25.6

21.3

 

  2 (%)

22.1

25.2

26.2

24.5

 

  3 (%)

14.1

19.8

25.9

32.6

 

Gensini score

24.94 ± 31.95

28.31 ± 34.42

30.02 ± 32.54

39.5 ± 37.73

<0.001

aSevere CAD defined as the patients with number of stenotic arteries ≥2. Data are means ± SD

CAD coronary artery disease, AMI acute myocardial infarction, HF heart failure, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP, diastolic blood pressure, HR heart rate, BUN blood urea nitrogen, UA uric acid, TG Triglycerides, TC total cholesterol, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, Apo-A Apolipoprotein A, Apo-B Apolipoprotein B, B2M β2-microglobulin

Relationship between serum B2M and prevalence of CAD

In univariate analysis, age, gender, smoking, drinking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and AMI were statistically associated with CAD. Further, clinical predictors (heart failure, hypertension and heart rate (HR)) and biochemical risk factors (creatinine, BUN, UA, TG, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, apolipoprotein-A, apolipoprotein-B, and B2M) were involved into multiple logistic regression model. After adjusted all the confounders, B2M (odds ratio, OR = 2.363, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.467–3.906, p = 0.001), gender (OR = 2.247, CI: 1.668–3.041, p < 0.001), age (OR = 1.035, CI: 1.021–1.050, p < 0.001), smoking (OR = 1.865, CI: 1.336–2.62, p < 0.001), hypertension (OR = 1.382, CI: 1.074–1.792, p = 0.014), diabetes (OR = 2.278, CI: 1.532–3.541, p < 0.001), AMI (OR = 6.224, CI: 2.272–25.708, p = 0.02) and HDL-C (OR = 0.626, CI: 0.479–0.806, p < 0.001) were predictors of CAD (Table 3).
Table 3

Multiple stepwise regression analysis showing variables independently associated with CAD

 

Odds Ratio (OR)

95% CI

p-value

B2M

2.363

1.467–3.906

0.001

Gender

2.247

1.668–3.041

<0.001

Age

1.035

1.021–1.050

<0.001

Smoking

1.865

1.336–2.620

<0.001

Hypertension

1.382

1.074–1.792

0.014

Diabetes

2.278

1.523–3.514

<0.001

AMI

6.224

2.272–25.708

0.002

HDL-C

0.626

0.479–0.806

<0.001

CAD coronary artery disease, B2M β2-microglobulin, AMI acute myocardial infarction, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol

The correlation of B2M levels and prevalence of CAD was further confirmed in all four quartiles of B2M levels (CAD prevalence in B2M quartiles: 68.1% vs 75.7% vs 79.1% vs 86.1%, OR (95%CI) =1.432 (1.288–1.602), p < 0.001, Fig. 2a, Table 2). The positive trend was also observed with increased number of stenotic arteries (p < 0.001, Table 2, Additional file 3: Figure S3).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Bar graphs show the prevalence of CAD (a) and severe CAD (b) according to B2M quartiles

The ability of correctly diagnosing CAD and non-CAD subject according to B2M was assessed using the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. B2M showed a moderate predictive ability for CAD according to the area under the ROC curve (AUC = 0.608,95% CI: 0.577–0.639, p = 0.001) (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

ROC curve analyses for predictive values of B2M in detecting CAD

Relationship between serum B2M and clinical or biochemical parameters

B2M was positively correlated with age (Pearson Correlation Coefficient (rp) rp = 0.207, p < 0.001), SBP (rp = 0.073, p = 0.004), creatinine (rp = 0.203, p < 0.001) and UA (rp = 0.113, p < 0.001) (Table 4). In multiple regression, age (standardized β = 0.197, p < 0.001), SBP (standardized β = 0.057, p = 0.020), creatinine (standardized β = 0.179, p < 0.001), and UA (standardized β = 0.095, p < 0.001) were still associated with B2M.
Table 4

Correlation of serum B2M with clinical and biochemical parameters

Variables

r

p-value

Age

0.207

<0.001

SBP

0.073

0.004

DBP

0.005

0.833

HR

0.021

0.407

Creatinine

0.203

0.000

BUN

0.029

0.262

UA

0.113

0.000

Glu

0.004

0.877

TG

−0.014

0.572

TC

0.033

0.195

HDL-C

−0.016

0.519

LDL-C

0.010

0.683

Apo-A

−0.037

0.149

Apo-B

−0.008

0.749

SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, HR heart rate, BUN blood urea nitrogen, UA uric acid, Glu blood glucose, TG Triglycerides, TC total cholesterol, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, Apo-A Apolipoprotein A, Apo-B Apolipoprotein B

Relationship between serum B2M and severity of CAD

B2M was positively correlated with Gensini score (Spearman Correlation Coefficient (rs) rs = 0.169, p < 0.001; Fig. 4a). We further assessed the relationship by a multiple stepwise regression model adjusting age, gender, smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and AMI. After adjustment, serum B2M was still significantly associated with the Gensini score (β = 0.078, 95% CI: 0.029–0.127, p = 0.002; Table 5).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Correlation between B2M and the severity of CAD evaluated by either (a) Gensini or (b) SYNTAX score

Table 5

Multiple stepwise regression analysis showing variables independently associated with Gensini score

Variables

Coefficients (β)

95% CI

p-value

B2M

0.078

0.029–0.127

0.0019

Gender

0.132

0.077–0.188

<0.001

Age

0.107

0.058–0.157

<0.001

Smoking

0.070

0.015–0.126

0.0125

Hypertension

0.052

0.004–0.101

0.0333

AMI

0.124

0.076–0.172

<0.001

Diabetes

0.105

0.057–0.153

<0.001

B2M β2-microglobulin, AMI acute myocardial infarction

We also performed the analysis in SYNTAX score. B2M was correlated with SYNTAX score (rs = 0.239, p < 0.001, Fig. 4b). In multiple stepwise regression, SYNTAX score was increased 0.077 as B2M level increased 1 mg/L (β = 0.077, 95% CI: 0.029–0.126, p = 0.002; Table 6).
Table 6

Multiple stepwise regression analysis showing variables independently associated with Syntax score

Variables

Coefficients (β)

95% CI

p-value

B2M

0.077

0.029–0.126

0.0018

Gender

0.160

0.105–0.215

<0.001

Age

0.154

0.104–0.203

<0.001

Smoking

0.049

−0.006–0.103

0.0802

Hypertension

0.062

0.014–0.109

0.0114

AMI

0.149

0.101–0.196

<0.001

Diabetes

0.109

0.061–0.156

<0.001

B2M β2-microglobulin, AMI acute myocardial infarction

Proportion of severe CAD was increased with higher B2M levels (29.4% vs 46.5% vs 52.2% vs 82.2%, p < 0.001, Fig. 2b, Table 2). B2M increased with the number of stenotic vessels with the lowest level in NVD of 0 (1.14 ± 0.28, 1.22 ± 0.61, 1.24 ± 0.32, 1.29 ± 0.39 mg/L in NVD of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively (Fig. 1b)).

Discussion

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is associated with a high rate of mortality. Scientists and researchers have attempted to reduce the burden by identifying the relationship between biomarkers and CAD. In recent years, several biomarkers - C-reactive protein [4, 5], natriuretic peptides [6, 7] and sensitive cardiac troponins [8, 9] - have been used to estimate the risk of CAD. Some researchers have also investigated the relationship between coagulation factors (such as Fibrinogen, Thrombin, and Tissue Factor), development of atherosclerosis and thrombotic complication [27, 28], so as to optimize the treatment of CAD patients.

This is the first study to reveal the effects of B2M plasmatic level in the extent of coronary atherosclerosis in a large consecutive Chinese population. Our study demonstrated the B2M was not only associated with CAD prevalence, but also positively correlated with severity of CAD. One study has reported the correlation between B2M and carotid atherosclerosis severity in renal failure patients [23]. However, biased study population and limited the sample size constrained the conclusion to extend to other population.

The protein B2M is a non-glycosylated polypeptide consisted of 99 amino acids, and it can interact with and stabilize the tertiary structure of the MHC I α-chain [29]. B2M is not directly attached to cell membranes, due to its non-covalently association with the α-chain. After released inside the cell or detached from cell surfaces, B2M is then largely removed via glomerular filtration. It is this process that allows the glomerular filtration rate to be estimated [30]. In comparison to healthy subjects (serum B2M <2ug/mL, and urinary excretion <400ug/24 h [29]), patients on dialysis have greatly elevated B2M levels which contribute to amyloid deposition and cardiovascular dysfunction [31]. Autoimmune, neoplastic, and infectious diseases, such as multiple myeloma, lymphoma, and Sjogren’s syndrome have also reported to associate with increased plasma levels of B2M [32–34].

Although the mechanism for the association between B2M levels and CAD remains to be clarified, the relationship between B2M and alterations in vascular structures, immunity and inflammation disorders, suggests B2M may contribute to vascular inflammation [35, 36]. Atherosclerotic syndromes are also predominantly associated with an inflammatory response [37, 38], which leads the relationship between B2M and CAD. Furthermore, studies have shown that B2M concentrations were significant non-renal predictors of cardiovascular outcomes, renal outcomes, and mortality [39–43].

Researchers have provided association between B2M and CAD risk factors [22, 35], and left atrial size [44]. Liu YS found a positive relationship of B2M to serum levels of creatinine and a negative relationship to creatinine clearance rate [44]. To further build on these studies, we divided the participants into four quartiles according to the serum B2M levels, as well as the number of SCA (0 to 3-VD). We observed the B2M level was remarkably associated with the prevalence of severe CAD (29.4% for B2M ≤1 mg/L, while 82.2% for B2M >1.35 mg/L). Another important observation was that the B2M level was positively correlated with creatinine, especially in the subjects with severe CAD. Liu YS also found a linear trend between uric acid and B2M, indicating a potential link between the kidney and the heart [44].

There were some limitations in this study. First, we did not have a control group for the CAD or suspected diagnosis of CAD. Although the participants with number of SCA of 0 were treated as control group (non-CAD), all subjects in our study were consecutive at least with the suspected diagnosis of CAD. Therefore, the control group participants may be with a high risk for CAD. Second, this is an observational study, the follow up outcomes of B2M levels on cardiovascular was unavailable.

Our study reveals a strong association between level of serum B2M and CAD (both prevalence and severity) in subjects without renal dysfunction. These findings provide support to the potential of B2M as a biomarker for CAD. Further studies are need to ensure the potential benefits of B2M level for CAD in clinical routine.

Conclusions

The significant association between serum B2M and CAD suggests that B2M could be a biomarker for CAD.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Our appreciation for the participants of this research and colleagues who assisted throughout the study. In particular, we thank Dr. Lei Zheng for statistics assistance.

Funding

This work was generously supported by grants from the Science and technology project of Hebei Province (Grant No. 15277715D to Ling You) and grants from the key project of medical science research in Hebei Province in 2015 (Grant No. 20150208 to Ling You).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article.

Authors’ contributions

L.Y. participated in the design, performed the experiment, collected the data, performed statistical analyses and drafted the manuscript. X.H. participated in the design, performed statistical analyses and helped to draft the manuscript. W.C. and R.X. participated in the design, performed statistical analyses. H.H., G.G., J.Z., H.Z. and X.Y. performed the experiment and collected the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by Clinical Research Ethical Committee of Hebei Medical University. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Cardiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 215 Heping West Rd, Xinhua, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050000, People’s Republic of China
(2)
Laboratory of Metabolism, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 37 Convent Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA

References

  1. Hemingway H, McCallum A, Shipley M, Manderbacka K, Martikainen P, Keskimaki I. Incidence and prognostic implications of stable angina pectoris among women and men. JAMA. 2006;295(12):1404–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Finegold JA, Asaria P, Francis DP. Mortality from ischaemic heart disease by country, region, and age: statistics from World Health Organisation and United Nations. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(2):934–45.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Beltrame JF, Weekes AJ, Morgan C, Tavella R, Spertus JA. The prevalence of weekly angina among patients with chronic stable angina in primary care practices: The Coronary Artery Disease in General Practice (CADENCE) Study. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(16):1491–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Haverkate F, Thompson SG, Pyke SD, Gallimore JR, Pepys MB. Production of C-reactive protein and risk of coronary events in stable and unstable angina. European Concerted Action on Thrombosis and Disabilities Angina Pectoris Study Group. Lancet. 1997;349(9050):462–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dibra A, Mehilli J, Braun S, Hadamitzky M, Baum H, Dirschinger J, Schuhlen H, Schomig A, Kastrati A. Association between C-reactive protein levels and subsequent cardiac events among patients with stable angina treated with coronary artery stenting. Am J Med. 2003;114(9):715–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kragelund C, Gronning B, Kober L, Hildebrandt P, Steffensen R. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and long-term mortality in stable coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(7):666–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ndrepepa G, Braun S, Niemoller K, Mehilli J, von Beckerath N, von Beckerath O, Vogt W, Schomig A, Kastrati A. Prognostic value of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in patients with chronic stable angina. Circulation. 2005;112(14):2102–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Omland T, de Lemos JA, Sabatine MS, Christophi CA, Rice MM, Jablonski KA, Tjora S, Domanski MJ, Gersh BJ, Rouleau JL, et al. A sensitive cardiac troponin T assay in stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(26):2538–47.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Ndrepepa G, Braun S, Mehilli J, Birkmeier KA, Byrne RA, Ott I, Hosl K, Schulz S, Fusaro M, Pache J, et al. Prognostic value of sensitive troponin T in patients with stable and unstable angina and undetectable conventional troponin. Am Heart J. 2011;161(1):68–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gussow D, Rein R, Ginjaar I, Hochstenbach F, Seemann G, Kottman A, Ploegh HL. The human beta 2-microglobulin gene. Primary structure and definition of the transcriptional unit. J Immunol. 1987;139(9):3132–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Winchester JF, Salsberg JA, Levin NW. Beta-2 microglobulin in ESRD: an in-depth review. Adv Ren Replace Ther. 2003;10(4):279–309.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ullum H, Lepri AC, Katzenstein TL, Phillips AN, Skinhoj P, Gerstoft J, Pedersen BK. Prognostic value of single measurements of beta-2-microglobulin, immunoglobulin A in HIV disease after controlling for CD4 lymphocyte counts and plasma HIV RNA levels. Scand J Infect Dis. 2000;32(4):371–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Diem H, Fateh-Moghadam A, Lamerz R. Prognostic factors in multiple myeloma: role of beta 2-microglobulin and thymidine kinase. Clin Investig. 1993;71(11):918–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Sadamori N, Mine M, Hakariya S, Ichiba M, Kawachi T, Itoyama T, Nakamura H, Tomonaga M, Hayashi K. Clinical significance of beta 2-microglobulin in serum of adult T cell leukemia. Leukemia. 1995;9(4):594–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Castro J, Jimenez-Alonso J, Sabio JM, Rivera-Civico F, Martin-Armada M, Rodriguez MA, Jaimez L, Castillo MJ, Sanchez-Roman J. Salivary and serum beta2-microglobulin and gamma-glutamyl-transferase in patients with primary Sjogren syndrome and Sjogren syndrome secondary to systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Chim Acta. 2003;334(1–2):225–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bethea M, Forman DT. Beta 2-microglobulin: its significance and clinical usefulness. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 1990;20(3):163–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Jovanovic D, Krstivojevic P, Obradovic I, Durdevic V, Dukanovic L. Serum cystatin C and beta2-microglobulin as markers of glomerular filtration rate. Ren Fail. 2003;25(1):123–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Wilson AM, Kimura E, Harada RK, Nair N, Narasimhan B, Meng XY, Zhang F, Beck KR, Olin JW, Fung ET, et al. Beta2-microglobulin as a biomarker in peripheral arterial disease: proteomic profiling and clinical studies. Circulation. 2007;116(12):1396–403.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fung ET, Wilson AM, Zhang F, Harris N, Edwards KA, Olin JW, Cooke JP. A biomarker panel for peripheral arterial disease. Vasc Med. 2008;13(3):217–24.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Cooke JP, Wilson AM. Biomarkers of peripheral arterial disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(19):2017–23.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Nead KT, Zhou MJ, Caceres RD, Sharp SJ, Wehner MR, Olin JW, Cooke JP, Leeper NJ. Usefulness of the addition of beta-2-microglobulin, cystatin C and C-reactive protein to an established risk factors model to improve mortality risk prediction in patients undergoing coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol. 2013;111(6):851–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Prentice RL, Paczesny S, Aragaki A, Amon LM, Chen L, Pitteri SJ, McIntosh M, Wang P, Buson Busald T, Hsia J, et al. Novel proteins associated with risk for coronary heart disease or stroke among postmenopausal women identified by in-depth plasma proteome profiling. Genome Med. 2010;2(7):48.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Zumrutdal A, Sezer S, Demircan S, Seydaoglu G, Ozdemir FN, Haberal M. Cardiac troponin I and beta 2 microglobulin as risk factors for early-onset atherosclerosis in patients on haemodialysis. Nephrology. 2005;10(5):453–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS, McGoon DC, Murphy ML, Roe BB. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1975;51(4 Suppl):5–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Gensini GG. A more meaningful scoring system for determining the severity of coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 1983;51(3):606.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Garg S, Sarno G, Serruys PW, Rodriguez AE, Bolognese L, Anselmi M, De Cesare N, Colangelo S, Moreno R, Gambetti S, et al. Prediction of 1-year clinical outcomes using the SYNTAX score in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a substudy of the STRATEGY (Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Abciximab and Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction) and MULTISTRATEGY (Multicenter Evaluation of Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban Versus Abciximab With Sirolimus-Eluting Stent or Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Study) trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4(1):66–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Campo G, Pavasini R, Pollina A, Tebaldi M, Ferrari R. Coagulation factors and recurrence of ischemic and bleeding adverse events in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Thromb Res. 2013;132(2):151–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Campo G, Valgimigli M, Ferraresi P, Malagutti P, Baroni M, Arcozzi C, Gemmati D, Percoco G, Parrinello G, Ferrari R, et al. Tissue factor and coagulation factor VII levels during acute myocardial infarction: association with genotype and adverse events. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26(12):2800–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Braciale TJ. Antigen processing for presentation by MHC class I molecules. Curr Opin Immunol. 1992;4(1):59–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Acchiardo S, Kraus Jr AP, Jennings BR. Beta 2-microglobulin levels in patients with renal insufficiency. Am J Kidney Dis. 1989;13(1):70–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Takayama F, Miyazaki S, Morita T, Hirasawa Y, Niwa T. Dialysis-related amyloidosis of the heart in long-term hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int Suppl. 2001;78:S172–176.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Alexanian R, Barlogie B, Fritsche H. Beta 2 microglobulin in multiple myeloma. Am J Hematol. 1985;20(4):345–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Cooper EH, Plesner T. Beta-2-microglobulin review: its relevance in clinical oncology. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1980;8(4):323–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Michalski JP, Daniels TE, Talal N, Grey HM. Beta2 microglobulin and lymphocytic infiltration in Sjogren’s syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1975;293(24):1228–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Saijo Y, Utsugi M, Yoshioka E, Horikawa N, Sato T, Gong Y, Kishi R. Relationship of beta2-microglobulin to arterial stiffness in Japanese subjects. Hypertens Res. 2005;28(6):505–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Tzoulaki I, Murray GD, Lee AJ, Rumley A, Lowe GD, Fowkes FG. C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and soluble adhesion molecules as predictors of progressive peripheral atherosclerosis in the general population: Edinburgh Artery Study. Circulation. 2005;112(7):976–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Libby P. Inflammation in atherosclerosis. Nature. 2002;420(6917):868–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Libby P, Ridker PM, Maseri A. Inflammation and atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2002;105(9):1135–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Astor BC, Shafi T, Hoogeveen RC, Matsushita K, Ballantyne CM, Inker LA, Coresh J. Novel markers of kidney function as predictors of ESRD, cardiovascular disease, and mortality in the general population. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;59(5):653–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Astor BC, Shaikh S, Chaudhry M. Associations of endogenous markers of kidney function with outcomes: more and less than glomerular filtration rate. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2013;22(3):331–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kals J, Zagura M, Serg M, Kampus P, Zilmer K, Unt E, Lieberg J, Eha J, Peetsalu A, Zilmer M. beta2-microglobulin, a novel biomarker of peripheral arterial disease, independently predicts aortic stiffness in these patients. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2011;71(4):257–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Amighi J, Hoke M, Mlekusch W, Schlager O, Exner M, Haumer M, Pernicka E, Koppensteiner R, Minar E, Rumpold H, et al. Beta 2 microglobulin and the risk for cardiovascular events in patients with asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis. Stroke. 2011;42(7):1826–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Shinkai S, Chaves PH, Fujiwara Y, Watanabe S, Shibata H, Yoshida H, Suzuki T. Beta2-microglobulin for risk stratification of total mortality in the elderly population: comparison with cystatin C and C-reactive protein. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(2):200–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Liu YS, Wang X, Jiang WD, Huang ZW, Wang YM, Hao L, Xing JL, Wang L, Liu XX, Lounsbury P, et al. Circulating levels of beta2-microglobulin and cystatin C are associated with left atrial size: additional link between the kidney and the heart. Clin Nephrol. 2013;80(3):168–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2261

Contact us