- Research article
- Open Access
Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention on re-hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders volume 14, Article number: 21 (2014)
The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains uncertain. The objective of this study was to examine the association between duration of dual antiplatelet therapy and re-hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in ACS patients who underwent PCI.
We identified 975 newly diagnosed ACS patients who underwent PCI between July, 2007 and June, 2009, at a medical center in Taiwan. Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the association between duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (9 months, 12 months and 15 months) and risks of re-hospitalization for ACS.
At a mean follow-up of 2.3 years, we found that use of clopidogrel for ≥ 12 months was associated with a decreased risk of re-hospitalization for ACS (adjusted HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.36-0.95; p = 0.03). However, use of clopidogrel for ≥ 15 months was not associated with a decreased risk of re-hospitalization for ACS (adjusted HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.29-1.13; p = 0.11). Similar results were found in patients who implanted drug-eluting stents (DES), for whom at least 12 months of clopidogrel therapy is especially critical.
The benefit of ≥ 12 months of clopidogrel use in reducing the risk of re-hospitalization for ACS was significant among ACS patients who underwent PCI and was especially critical for those who implanted DES.
The clinical benefits of clopidogrel in combination with aspirin in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have been well demonstrated [1–4]. However, the optimal treatment duration of dual antiplatelet therapy following PCI remains uncertain. Findings from the PCI subpopulation of the Clopidogrel in Unstable Angina to Prevent Recurrent Events (PCI-CURE)  trial suggested that 3-12 months duration of clopidogrel treatment after PCI significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke. Nevertheless, other studies showed no benefits from continuing clopidogrel beyond 6 months . The 2011 guideline issued by the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA), however, has advocated an at least 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy following PCI and an extended duration of treatment to at least 15 months and possibly indefinitely for patients who received drug-eluting stents (DES) . The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines for the management of ACS in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) also suggest a 12-months of dual antiplatelet therapy for these patients [7, 8].
Several issues have been raised regarding the latest guidelines . First, the extended duration of 15 months was suggested mainly due to the concern of late stent thrombosis associated with DES. Although a slight increase in the risk of DES thrombosis after the first year has been noted [9, 10], there is no report to support the effectiveness of a 15-months clopidogrel therapy. Secondly, prolonged clopidogrel therapy could be costly and associated with risks for major bleeding . Thirdly, the recommendation of 12-months or even15-months of dual antiplatelet therapy may not be generalizable to the non-US ACS population, due to regional and health insurance plan limitations. The conflict between the reimbursement policy and latest clinical guidelines may further reflect urgent needs for more evidence on the minimal necessary duration of dual antiplatelet therapy for ACS patients.
The objective of this study was to examine the association between duration of dual antiplatelet therapy and re-hospitalization for ACS in ACS patients who underwent PCI. Specifically, we evaluated the clinical benefit of at least 15-months of dual antiplatelet therapy among the DES population.
Patients included in this retrospective cohort study were those who hospitalized for a newly-diagnosed ACS (International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Diagnosis (ICD-9) CM codes: 410.xx, 411.xx, and 414.xx) and who underwent PCI between July 1, 2007 and June 30, 2009 at a 2000-bed, university-affiliated, medical centre in Taiwan. Eligible patients were those with no documented ACS-related diagnoses or procedures before the index ACS hospitalization. Patients who underwent both PCI and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), who received fibrinolytic agents during the index ACS hospitalization, who received clopidogrel less than 7 days after discharge, who lost to follow-up or for whom follow-up data were not available were excluded.
Baseline data were obtained from the hospital computerized medical system and confirmed by reviewing patients’ medical records. For each patient, data during the index ACS hospitalization were collected, including demographic characteristics, family history, smoking history, body mass index, biochemistry tests (including serum creatinine, total cholesterol, triglyceride, fasting blood glucose, hemoglobin A1c), comorbidities, left ventricular ejection fraction, angiographic findings including extent of coronary artery stenosis, stent type, diameter, length, and site of stent deployment. Additional data collected were concomitant medications used during the follow-up.
All clopidogrel prescriptions were obtained from the hospital electronic pharmacy prescription database. The numbers of refills, doses, and pills dispensed of each prescription after discharge were identified to calculate the duration of clopidogrel use.
The study endpoint was a re-hospitalization for ACS, which was defined as a subsequent hospitalization with a primary diagnosis of ACS (ICD-9 CM codes: 410.xx, 411.xx, 414.xx, and 996.72) after discharge from the index ACS hospitalization. Medical records were reviewed to further confirm the subsequent ACS hospitalization.
In order to explore the association between clopidogrel duration and re-hospitalization for ACS, we compared the study endpoint in patients who received clopidogrel for a certain duration after discharging from the index hospitalization (categorized as “continuous users”) with those who did not (categorized as “discontinuous users”). Three predefined time points were used in our study: 9 months, 12 months and 15 months of clopidogrel use. For example, in the “9-months analysis”, patients who were event-free at 9 months were categorized into continuous users (received clopidogrel for ≥ 9 months) and discontinuous users (received clopidogrel for < 9 months). On categorization, a window of 30 days was allowed for potential time lag between 2 prescriptions. Similar algorithm were applied to the 12- and 15- months time points.
Descriptive analyses of the differences between “continuous users” and “discontinuous users” were conducted using χ2 and F values for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables.
Unadjusted event rates were compared between the continuous and discontinuous clopidogrel users. Cox proportional-hazard models were performed to estimate the association between duration of clopidogrel use and the risk of re-hospitalization for ACS. Patients who died during the follow-up were censored. The univariate relations between baseline variables with ACS re-hospitalization were first performed. We then performed multivariable Cox regression models adjusted for variables with a significance level of p-value < 0.15 identified in the univariate analyses. Stepwise selections were further used to determine variables to retain in the models. The variable denoting duration of clopidogrel use was retained in the model irrespective of its statistical significance. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated based on the stepwise selection. We performed similar analyses in patients who implanted DES during the index hospitalization. All analyses were performed using the SAS statistical software, version 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina). This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of National Taiwan University Hospital (200911017R).
Of the 2,641 patients newly hospitalized for ACS between July 1, 2007 and June 30, 2009, we identified 1,382 patients who underwent PCI. After applying the exclusion criteria, we identified 975 patients as our initial study cohort (Figure 1).
The 9-months analysis
The 9-months analysis included 744 patients who were event-free at 9 months after the index hospitalization. Patients in the continuous and discontinuous groups were well balanced in terms of most baseline characteristics (Tables 1 and 2). At a mean follow-up of 815 days (27 months), the cumulative rates of ACS re-hospitalization were 14.6% and 20.9% for continuous and discontinuous clopidogrel users, respectively (Table 3). The clinical benefit of use of clopidogrel for ≥ 9 months in reducing hazards of ACS re-hospitalization was non-statistically significant (adjusted HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.48-1.00; p = 0.05) (Table 3).
The 12-months analysis
At 12 months after the index hospitalization, 45% (317/699) of patients were identified as continuous clopidogrel users. Compared to discontinuous clopidogrel users, continuous clopidogrel users were more likely to have a non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and DES implantation at index hospitalization. Continuous clopidogrel users had higher prevalence of hypertension, multi-vessel disease, right coronary artery (RCA) stenosis, longer stent length, and smaller stent diameter as well (Table 2).
Patients who received clopidogrel ≥ 12 months had a lower crude incidence rate of re-hospitalization for ACS (9.2%) compared to discontinuous group (13.9%). The clinical benefit of clopidogrel therapy ≥ 12 months after a mean follow-up of 2.2 years were statistically significant in the multivariable Cox regression models (risk for ACS re-hospitalization; adjusted HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.36-0.95; p = 0.03) (Table 3).
The 15-months analysis
At 15 months after the index hospitalization, only 25% (164/653) of patients continued their clopidogrel use for more than 15 months. Compared to discontinuous users, patients received ≥ 15 months of clopidogrel therapy were older, had higher prevalence of multi-vessel disease and multiple stents, longer stent length, and were more likely to have a DES implantation during index hospitalization. Also, continuous users were more likely to have ostial lesion or left main (LM) artery stenosis. A 15-months of clopidogrel therapy was not associated with a significant reduction in ACS re-hospitalization (adjusted HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.29-1.13; p = 0.11) (Table 3).
Among patients who underwent at least one DES implantation, the risk of ACS re-hospitalization between patients who received ≥ 9 (N = 369) and <9 months of clopidogrel (N = 185) were not statistically different (adjusted HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.44-1.06; p = 0.09). In contrast, those who received clopidogrel for ≥ 12 months (N = 271), compared with those who discontinued within 12 months (N = 252), had a significantly lower risk of ACS re-hospitalization (adjusted HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.29-0.92; p = 0.02). However, the aforementioned clinical benefit was lost when clopidogrel therapy was extended for more than 15 months (N = 140) (adjusted HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.37-1.56; p = 0.45) (Table 4).
Other risk factors of ACS re-hospitalization
Other factors associated with ACS re-hospitalization in our multivariable Cox proportional models included multi-vessel disease (adjusted HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.12-2.80; p = 0.02), minimum of stent diameter < 2.5 mm (adjusted HR 3.19, 95% CI 1.29-7.88; p = 0.01), use of NSAID (adjusted HR 5.88, 95% CI 1.82-18.99; p = 0.003), and uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (adjusted HR 1.88, 95% CI 1.09-3.23; p = 0.02).
The main finding of this study is that there is significant benefit associated with ≥ 12 months of clopidogrel therapy in reducing the risk of ACS re-hospitalization among patients who underwent PCI for ACS. Our study provides further insights into clinical benefits of clopidogrel use beyond 12 months in this patient population. Nevertheless, clopidogrel therapy ≥ 15 months is not associated with significant clinical benefit in terms of reducing ACS re-hospitalization. Similar results are found in the DES population.
Our findings extend the current knowledge about the duration of clopidogrel use in a “real-world” ACS population. Conflicting data on the clinical benefits of continuous use of dual antiplatelet therapy between 6 months to 12 months have been reported in prior studies [12–15]. Kimura and his colleague  showed that continuous use of clopidogrel ≧ 6 months was not associated with a statistically significant higher risk of MI or death compared with continuous use of clopidogrel < 6 months (< 6 months 4.1% vs. ≧ 6 months 4.0%, p = 0.99). Park et al.  also found that the hazard ratios of stent thrombosis (HR 1.38; 95% CI 0.17-11.21; p = 0.77) and death or MI (HR 1.16; 95% CI 0.56-2.42; p = 0.69) were comparable among patients continuing and not continuing clopidogrel at 12 months. In contrast, the Clopidogrel for the Reduction of Events During Observation (CREDO) trial  suggested that at 1 year, long-term clopidogrel use was associated with a 26.9% relative reduction in the combined risk of death, MI, or stroke (95% CI 3.9%-44.4%; p = 0.02). Furthermore, an observational study done by Eisenstein et al.  found that discontinued clopidogrel before 12 months was associated with a higher risk of MI or death (4.5% vs. 0%) in the DES but not in the BMS group.
Along with several recent observational studies [16–18], our findings support the latest ACC /AHA guideline  that a at least 12-months of dual antiplatelet therapy following PCI would be beneficial to ACS patients. We found that, at a mean follow-up of approximately 2 years, 9 months of clopidogrel therapy only provided a marginal benefit in reducing the risk of ACS re-hospitalization (adjusted HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.48-1.00; p = 0.05) while 12 months of clopidogrel use was associated with a 40% reduction of the risk of ACS re-hospitalization (adjusted HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.36-0.95; p = 0.03). The 12 months of clopidogrel use is especially critical to the DES population. Among DES patients, we found a larger reduction in the hazard of ACS re-hospitalization (adjusted HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.29-0.92; p = 0.02) for patients received at least 12 months of clopidogrel but not 9 months of clopidogrel use.
Our study, however, does not support an extend duration of clopidogrel use to at least 15 months for patients who receive DES by the ACC /AHA guideline . Our data shows that DES patients who received clopidogrel for at least 15 months was not associated with a decreased hazard of ACS re-hospitalization (adjusted HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.37-1.56; p = 0.45). To date, our study may be the first one to provide empirical evidence regarding the clinical benefit of extended clopidogrel to 15 months in ACS patients underwent PCI (especially DES). Given the increased bleeding risk and inherent economic burden with prolonged antiplatelet therapy [11, 14], the most clinical and economic efficient strategy is to assure a 12 months of clopidogrel to all ACS patients who undergo PCI until we have more evidence.
There are inherent limitations with our retrospective observational study design. As with any non-randomized design, significant differences in comorbidities between patients who continued clopidogrel or not could have affected hazard estimations of ACS re-hospitalization. However, our patients in the continuous and discontinuous groups were well balanced in terms of most baseline characteristics, including prevalence of peripheral vascular diseases. In addition, our hospital-based setting also allowed us to adjust for a wide range of potential cardiovascular risk factors, including very detailed procedural characteristics and information on other concomitant medications (such as ACEI/ARBs, lipid-lowering agents, and NSAID). Second, because of its retrospective nature, we do not know the reasons for clopidogrel discontinuation. Thirdly, our findings may not be generalizable to non-Asian populations. Previous study has indicated that the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 poor metabolizers may exhibit less antiplatelet activity when they were exposed to the same clopidogrel regimen than other healthy volunteers. The variation of prevalence of CYP2C19 poor metabolizers in different populations (3-6% of Europeans and Africans, and 13-23% of Asians) thus need to be taken into account when interpreting our findings . Fourthly, we did not report risk of bleeding according to the duration of clopidogrel as it was not the main focus of our study. Fifthly, we did not include newer antiplatelet agents such as prasugrel and ticagrelor in our study as both of them were not reimbursed by Taiwan’s NHI program during our study period (prasugrel: currently not available; ticagrelor (available since July, 2013)).
Despite these limitations, this study has several significant methodological strengths. First, the medication utilization data were based both on the hospital electronic pharmacy prescription database and medical charts. Previous observational studies, however, relied on pharmacy claims [17, 20] and seldom captured clopidogrel use paid out-of-pocket. Furthermore, because aspirin prescriptions are covered by the NHI program, patients seldom obtain aspirin over the counter. This allows us to capture the “dual” antiplatelet therapy in our study cohort. For example, at 9 months of follow-up, approximately 87% of the discontinuous users and 80% of the continuous users concomitantly used aspirin. Another methodological strength with the hospital-based data source is that we could include very detailed procedural characteristics in our model to provide better estimations of hazards of ACS re-hospitalization.
Our study provides new evidence on the minimal necessary clopidogrel use in an ACS population. Together, our study and findings of recently published studies support the latest clinical guideline that a 12-months of clopidogrel therapy conveys an important clinical benefit after PCI (especially DES). Further studies are required to evaluate the clinical benefits of clopidogrel use up to 15 months or more.
Acute coronary syndrome
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Coronary artery bypass graft
ST-elevation myocardial infarction
Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction.
Budaj A, Yusuf S, Mehta SR, Fox KA, Tognoni G, Zhao F, Chrolavicius S, Hunt D, Keltai M, Franzosi MG, Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent Events (CURE) Trial Investigators: Benefit of clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation in various risk groups. Circulation. 2002, 106 (13): 1622-1626. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000029926.71825.E2.
Pfisterer M, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Buser PT, Rickenbacher P, Hunziker P, Mueller C, Jeger R, Bader F, Osswald S, Kaiser C, BASKET-LATE Investigators: Late clinical events after clopidogrel discontinuation may limit the benefit of drug-eluting stents: an observational study of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006, 48 (12): 2584-2591. 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.026.
Mehta SR, Yusuf S, Peters RJ, Bertrand ME, Lewis BS, Natarajan MK, Malmberg K, Rupprecht H, Zhao F, Chrolavicius S, Copland I, Fox KA, Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent Events trial (CURE) Investigators: Effects of pretreatment with clopidogrel and aspirin followed by long-term therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the PCI-CURE study. Lancet. 2001, 358 (9281): 527-533. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05701-4.
Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR, Chrolavicius S, Tognoni G, Fox KK: Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med. 2001, 345 (7): 494-502.
Airoldi F, Colombo A, Morici N, Latib A, Cosgrave J, Buellesfeld L, Bonizzoni E, Carlino M, Gerckens U, Godino C, Melzi G, Michev I, Montorfano M, Sangiorgi GM, Qasim A, Chieffo A, Briguori C, Grube E: Incidence and predictors of drug-eluting stent thrombosis during and after discontinuation of thienopyridine treatment. Circulation. 2007, 116 (7): 745-754. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.686048.
Wright RS, Anderson JL, Adams CD, Bridges CR, Casey DE, Ettinger SM, Fesmire FM, Ganiats TG, Jneid H, Lincoff AM, Peterson ED, Philippides GJ, Theroux P, Wenger NK, Zidar JP, Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, Bridges CR, Califf RM, Casey DE, Chavey WE, Fesmire FM, Hochman JS, Levin TN, Lincoff AM, Peterson ED, Theroux P, Wenger NK, Zidar JP, American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: 2011 ACCF/AHA focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines developed in collaboration with the American Academy of Family Physicians, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011, 57 (19): e215-e367. 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.011.
Taylor J: 2012 ESC Guidelines on acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). Eur Heart J. 2012, 33 (20): 2501-2502.
Hamm CW, Bassand JP, Agewall S, Bax J, Boersma E, Bueno H, Caso P, Dudek D, Gielen S, Huber K, Ohman M, Petrie MC, Sonntag F, Uva MS, Storey RF, Wijns W, Zahger D, ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines: ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2011, 32 (23): 2999-3054.
Camenzind E, Steg PG, Wijns W: Stent thrombosis late after implantation of first-generation drug-eluting stents: a cause for concern. Circulation. 2007, 115 (11): 1440-1455. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.666800. discussion 55
Lagerqvist B, James SK, Stenestrand U, Lindback J, Nilsson T, Wallentin L: Long-term outcomes with drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in Sweden. N Engl J Med. 2007, 356 (10): 1009-1019. 10.1056/NEJMoa067722.
Bhatt DL, Fox KA, Hacke W, Berger PB, Black HR, Boden WE, Cacoub P, Cohen EA, Creager MA, Easton JD, Flather MD, Haffner SM, Hamm CW, Hankey GJ, Johnston SC, Mak KH, Mas JL, Montalescot G, Pearson TA, Steg PG, Steinhubl SR, Weber MA, Brennan DM, Fabry-Ribaudo L, Booth J, Topol EJ, CHARISMA Investigators: Clopidogrel and aspirin versus aspirin alone for the prevention of atherothrombotic events. N Engl J Med. 2006, 354 (16): 1706-1717. 10.1056/NEJMoa060989.
Kimura T, Morimoto T, Nakagawa Y, Tamura T, Kadota K, Yasumoto H, Nishikawa H, Hiasa Y, Muramatsu T, Meguro T, Inoue N, Honda H, Hayashi Y, Miyazaki S, Oshima S, Honda T, Shiode N, Namura M, Sone T, Nobuyoshi M, Kita T, Mitsudo K, j-Cypher Registry Investigators: Antiplatelet therapy and stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Circulation. 2009, 119 (7): 987-995. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.808311.
Park DW, Yun SC, Lee SW, Kim YH, Lee CW, Hong MK, Cheong SS, Kim JJ, Park SW, Park SJ: Stent thrombosis, clinical events, and influence of prolonged clopidogrel use after placement of drug-eluting stent data from an observational cohort study of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008, 1 (5): 494-503. 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.06.011.
Steinhubl SR, Berger PB, Mann JT, Fry ET, DeLago A, Wilmer C, Topol EJ, CREDO Investigators. Clopidogrel for the Reduction of Events During Observation: Early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002, 288 (19): 2411-2420. 10.1001/jama.288.19.2411.
Eisenstein EL, Anstrom KJ, Kong DF, Shaw LK, Tuttle RH, Mark DB, Kramer JM, Harrington RA, Matchar DB, Kandzari DE, Peterson ED, Schulman KA, Califf RM: Clopidogrel use and long-term clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation. JAMA. 2007, 297 (2): 159-168. 10.1001/jama.297.2.joc60179.
Banerjee S, Varghese C, Samuel J, Weideman RA, Little BB, Kelly KC, Rao SV, Reilly RF, Brilakis ES: Comparison of the impact of short (<1 year) and long-term (> or =1 year) clopidogrel use following percutaneous coronary intervention on mortality. Am J Cardiol. 2008, 102 (9): 1159-1162. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.06.058.
Ernst FR, Johnston S, Curkendall S, Mozaffari E, Stemkowski S: Effect of early clopidogrel discontinuation on rehospitalization in acute coronary syndrome: results from two distinct patient populations. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2011, 68 (11): 1015-1024. 10.2146/ajhp100455.
Wiederkehr D, Ogbonnaya A, Casciano R, Makenbaeva D, Mozaffari E, Corbelli J: Clinical impact of early clopidogrel discontinuation following acute myocardial infarction hospitalization or stent implantation: analysis in a nationally representative managed-care population. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009, 25 (9): 2327-2334. 10.1185/03007990903156087.
Yusuf I, Djojosubroto MW, Ikawati R, Lum K, Kaneko A, Marzuki S: Ethnic and geographical distributions of CYP2C19 alleles in the populations of Southeast Asia. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2003, 531: 37-46. 10.1007/978-1-4615-0059-9_3.
Wiederkehr D, Berenson K, Casciano R, Stern L, Makenbaeva D, Mozaffari E, Lamerato L, Corbelli J: Clinical impact of early clopidogrel discontinuation following acute myocardial infarction hospitalization or stent implantation: analysis in a single integrated health network. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009, 25 (9): 2317-2325. 10.1185/03007990903156061.
The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2261/14/21/prepub
This study was partially sponsored by the research grant (DOH099-FDA-41005) from the Food and Drug Administration, Taiwan.
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
HFY, LCM, GCS, and CSC were responsible for development of the study concept and design, and for the preparation of the manuscript. CSC contributed to the data acquisition and statistical analysis. HWWY contributed to the revision of the manuscript. All authors participated in the analysis and interpretation of the data, read and approved the manuscript for submission.
Authors’ original submitted files for images
Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, S., Hsiao, F., Lee, C. et al. Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention on re-hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 14, 21 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-14-21
- Acute coronary syndrome (ACS)
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
- Dual antiplatelet therapy
- Drug eluting stent (DES)