Skip to main content

Gender differences in presentation, management, and outcomes among Egyptian patients with acute coronary syndrome: a single-centre registry

Abstract

Background

Despite a significant rise in cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), data are scarce regarding the quality of care provided, particularly for women.

Methods

This is a prospective observational, cross-sectional study. Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients presented to the Cardiology Department at Tanta University, Egypt, between September 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023, were enrolled. The study assessed gender disparities by comparing men and women regarding presentation, management, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) occurrence during hospitalization and 30 days after discharge.

Results

A total of 400 ACS patients were included, with 29.5% being women. Women were comparatively older (59 ± 9 years vs. 55 ± 13 years), with a significantly higher prevalence of hypertension (70.3% vs. 47.5%) and diabetes (55% vs. 36.8%). Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (Non-STEMI) was more common in women (35.29% vs. 21%). Dyspnea was expressed by 34.4% of women (vs. 21.35% of men). Women were hospitalized later (9.29 h vs. 6.74 h). In-hospital outcomes were poorer for women with worse NYHA classes III and IV. Additionally, the odds ratio (OR) for in-hospital cardiac mortality was 0.303 (95% CI 0.103–0.893) for women compared to men. However, a one-month follow-up for MACE post-hospital discharge did not indicate significant gender differences.

Conclusions

The current study suggests that women with ACS in Egypt exhibit a higher risk profile for CVD compared to men and tend to present later with atypical symptoms. Women additionally experience poorer in-hospital MACE and higher cardiac mortality. Therefore, increasing awareness about ACS syndrome and eliminating obstacles that delay hospital admission are imperative.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the primary cause of mortality among women globally, taking the lives of approximately 6 million individuals annually. Notably, women admitted to hospitals with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) often experience inferior outcomes compared to men [1, 2].

Studies, particularly from high-income countries (HICs), have revealed disparities in the treatment of ACS between men and women. Women are less likely to receive guideline-recommended pharmacotherapy and undergo invasive procedures like angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) [3, 4]. Additionally, an increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes was observed for women with ACS undergoing an early invasive strategy and coronary revascularization compared with men [5].

Despite a significant rise in the prevalence of cardiovascular disease-related mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) [6] ; data are scarce regarding the quality of care provided for women [7], and only a few reports are available from specific regions, especially Africa [8]. According to the World Bank classification, Egypt falls within the lower-middle income category [9]. Although CVD accounted for 46.2% of the overall mortality in Egypt in 2017, studies evaluating gender differences in ACS in Egypt are limited [10].

This study aimed to identify gender disparities in the presentation, management patterns, and outcomes of ACS patients in Egypt. Such research is crucial for clinicians, cardiologists, and global health experts to improve awareness and guidelines about women’s heart health in Egypt and other LMICs.

Methods

Sample size

The sample size was determined using EPI Info (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA), version 7 [11]. Previous studies by Ibrahim et al. [12] and Mansour et al. [13] estimated the prevalence of ACS in Egypt to be approximately 8.3%. While using a 5% margin of error, a 99.9% confidence level, and a response distribution of 80%, the minimum representative sample size was initially estimated to be 330 patients. Still, this investigation increased the sample by 20% to accommodate any potential loss during the follow-up after hospital discharge. As a result, four hundred patients were enrolled.

Study design

The present study is a prospective cross-sectional observational study conducted at the cardiovascular department of Tanta University Hospital, Gharbia Governorate, Egypt, between September 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023. The study was approved by the ethical committee at the Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Egypt, (Clinical Trial Number: 36264PR395/10/23).

Inclusion criteria

The study included male and female patients aged > 18 who consecutively presented with ACS. ACS has been defined according to the guidelines established by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) [14] and includes two distinct presentations: ST-segment elevation ACS (STEMI), characterized by acute chest pain with persistent ST-segment elevation lasting for more than 20 min, and Non-ST-segment elevation ACS (Non-STEMI). The latter refers to patients experiencing acute chest pain without ST-segment elevation on electrocardiogram (ECG) but exhibiting ECG changes such as transient ST segment elevation, persistent or transient ST segment depression, T wave inversion, flat T wave, pseudonormalization of T waves, or a normal ECG with positive troponin enzyme levels.

Exclusion criteria

Patients who refused to give informed consent, those with insufficient medical records, patients who skipped follow-up appointments, and patients with severe morbidity affecting survival, such as cancer, were excluded.

Data collection

It included a comprehensive history-taking process focused on age, smoking status, and family history, as well as a thorough evaluation of the complaint and presenting symptoms, including onset and duration.

Specific attention was placed on established risk factors, including dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension. Dyslipidaemia is defined as having a history of lipid-lowering therapy or low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol > 70 mg/dl [15]. Hypertension is described as having a history of hypertension or systolic or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg [16]. Diabetes (type 1 or 2) is a history of diabetes or fasting plasma glucose > 126 mg/dl.

Diagnostic procedures

A well-standardized 12-lead resting ECG was performed with particular emphasis on heart rate, cardiac rhythm, conduction abnormalities, ST segment deviation, and T-wave changes. Laboratory investigations comprised troponin I, complete blood counts, HbA1c, serum creatinine, and lipid profiles.

Bedside echocardiograms were performed following the American Society of Echocardiography recommendations [17] for assessing ejection fraction (EF) and resting wall motion abnormalities, mechanical complications, substantial valvular lesions, and other aberrant findings. Furthermore, the echocardiography was repeated on the discharge day morning.

Treatment and follow-up

Medications, management strategies, and in-hospital courses were recorded. Coronary angiography and intervention were conducted for STEMI and high-risk non-STEMI patients following ESC guidelines [18]. Patients were cautiously observed for contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) and significant bleeding. The latter is defined according to the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator Criteria for Occluded Coronary Arteries [19].

Furthermore, this trial monitored every patient for 30 days post-hospital discharge, where follow-up visits were arranged once every two weeks at the outpatient clinic.

Study outcomes

The primary outcomes are in-hospital and 30-day post-discharge cardiac mortality and other major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) events, including reinfarction, heart failure (NHYA III/IV), cerebral stroke, and any unplanned readmission for heart failure and/or reinfarction. Cardiovascular mortality was used to calculate the composite of MACE per patient when accompanied by other MACE events.

Data analysis

A descriptive analysis was performed using means and standard deviations for parametric tests and means and medians for non-parametric tests. The chi-square test was employed to assess the differences between groups based on categorical variables. At the same time, the unpaired t-test was used for continuous variables when the Komolgorov-Smirnov normality test confirmed a normal distribution and a significance level of p < 0.05 was established. The Mann-Whitney U test was applied for non-normally distributed data.

  • The incidence rates of clinical outcomes were based on gender. The OR and confidence intervals (CI) were reported.

  • Multivariate logistic regression identified potential predictors for MACE, considering p < 0.05 as significant.

  • Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests assessed 30-day MACE survival differences between men and women.

  • Statistical analyses were performed online using DATAtab: Online Statistics Calculator, provided by DATAtab e.U. Graz, Austria. URL: https://datatab.net [20].

Results

Baseline characteristics (table 1)

Table 1 Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of ACS patients

A total of 65 patients (49 men and 16 women) were excluded from the study because they had not completed their post-hospital discharge follow-up at our clinic, and therefore their 30-day outcomes were missed. Finally, this study enrolled 400 patients diagnosed with ACS. Women constituted 29.5% of the cohort. Men exhibited a higher prevalence of STEMI than women (79% vs. 64%; p = 0.003), whereas non-STEMI was more common among women (35.2% vs. 21%; p = 0.003). Women were older (59 ± 9 years vs. 55 ± 13 years, p = 0.001). The most represented age group for both genders was between 56 and 65 (see Supplementary Fig. 1, Additional File 1).

There was a statistically significant difference in marital status, with a notable percentage of widows among women (17.6% vs. 6.0%; p = < 0.001). Additionally, most women were unemployed (76.2% vs. 45.3%, p = < 0.001). In contrast to women, the prevalence of current smoking was notably higher among men (62.28% vs. 15.97%, p < 0.001).

Regarding clinical risk factors, the prevalence of hypertension was more significant among women (71.5% vs. 47.1%; p < 0.001), and the percentage of diabetic women was higher compared to men (54.6% vs. 37%, p = 0.001). Previous myocardial infarction (MI) was more common in men (15.25% vs. 7.69%, p = 0.041). Men have had previous PCI in a similar percentage to women (14,54% vs. 12.8%; p = 0.653).

Presentation (table 2)

Table 2 Clinical presentation and ECG findings between the two groups:

Anginal pain was the most common presenting symptom expressed by approximately 96% of the total patients, followed by dyspnea, which was more common in women (34.45% vs. 21.35% in men, p = 0.006). Palpitation was associated with ECG evidence of arrhythmias, especially atrial fibrillation, in 13 cases, while three actual syncope cases were encountered because of complete heart block (CHB).

Women exhibited a significantly higher heart rate than men (87.5 ± 27.6 vs. 81.1 ± 16.5, p = 0.023). Most patients (97.5%) were classified as Killip Class I and II, with 1.5% in Class III and 1% in Class IV, displaying no statistically significant difference. However, in STEMI subgroup analysis, more women presented in Killip classes III and IV than men (4.2% vs. 0.35%, p = 0.006).

The two groups had no statistically significant difference regarding laboratory results, including total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, on-admission creatinine, on-admission RBG, on-admission troponin, and glycated haemoglobin (see Supplementary Table 1, Additional File 2).

In-hospital management/pharmacotherapy

Male patients received higher prescription rates for aspirin, ticagrelor, ACEIs, and statins compared to females. Over 70% of patients were given beta-blockers, and over 78% were given angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEI/ARBs) (see Supplementary Table 2, Additional File 3).

In-hospital management/coronary intervention (table 3)

Table 3 Coronary angiography and its findings among the enrolled men and women:

The time between symptom onset and hospital admission was longer for women (mean = 9.29 h, median = 10.9 vs. 6.74 h, median = 6.9, p = 0.001). Additionally, in the STEMI subgroup undergoing primary PCI (pPCI), door-to-balloon time was longer in women compared to men (mean = 116 min, median = 75 min vs. mean = 115.5 min, median = 45 min, p = 0.01) (see Supplementary Fig. 2, Additional File 4).

An early invasive strategy was employed in 85% of all ACS patients. No gender variation was noted regarding reperfusion strategy, intervention access, culprit vessel, coronary anatomy complexity, number of stents, or procedural complications (see Supplementary Table 2, Additional File 3).

MI with no obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA) was more prevalent in women (6 cases vs. 2 cases, p = 0.003). Streptokinase was administered as thrombolytic therapy to 48 STEMI patients. Additionally, in 4.91% of cases, an urgent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) was recommended, and temporary pacemaker implantation was performed in four cases with CHB.

In-hospital outcomes (table 4)

Table 4 In-hospital course, MACE and 30-day outcomes between the two groups:

The duration of hospital stay revealed no significant difference (3.01 ± 0.62 days for men vs. 3.11 ± 0.9 for women; p = 0.278). Likewise, there were no statistically significant differences between the two genders as regards discharge EF%, post-PCI CIN, rate of blood transfusion, access site major bleeding, or cerebral stroke occurrence.

However, the in-hospital outcomes were poorer in women with higher NYHA classes III and IV rates. The OR for in-hospital cardiac mortality was 0.303 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.103–0.893) for women vs. men. Conversely, the OR for the composite of in-hospital MACE was higher in women at 2.45 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33–4.53) compared to men.

30-day outcomes (table 4)

A one-month duration of follow-up did not exhibit a significant difference between men and women regarding unplanned readmission for heart failure, reinfarction, stroke, or cardiac mortality, with no statistically significant findings observed between genders (P = 0.47, 0.189, 0.62, and 0.291, respectively). The log-rank test indicated no disparity between genders in the time distribution until MACE events occurred (p = 0.66) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

An extendedrank test the log-rank test exhibits no significant statistical difference between men and women regarding 30-day MACE events, P value = 0.66

A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to identify potential in-hospital and 30-day MACE predictors. The results revealed that older age, female gender, renal impairment, atrial fibrillation, and impaired EF < 40% are potential independent predictors with respective P-values of (0.046, 0.015, 0.004, 0.002, and < 0.001) (Table 5).

Table 5 Univariate and multivariate regression analysis for predictors of all MACE events (both in hospital and 30-day):

Discussion

The current study aimed to elucidate gender-based disparities in the presentation, management, and outcome of ACS patients in Egypt. This may serve as a model for similar LMICs lacking such data to improve healthcare quality, particularly for women.

Key findings revealed delayed hospital admissions among women after the onset of ACS, mainly because of atypical symptoms. In addition, women received less administration of the potent antiplatelet medication ticagrelor before pPCI, as well as a longer door-to-balloon time.

Women had worse in-hospital outcomes, particularly in terms of heart failure and cardiac mortality. However, short-term 30-day survival against MACE was similar in both genders.

Multivariate regression analysis identified female gender, older age, renal impairment, atrial fibrillation, and ejection EF < 40% as potential predictors for MACE.

Women constituted 29.5% of the total patients in this study, a proportion higher than previously reported in studies discussing ACS in Egypt and nearby Gulf region countries (21% in Egypt vs. 19% in the Gulf region vs. 32% globally), aligning closely with proportions observed in extensive studies conducted in developed countries worldwide [21].

The mean age for ACS patients in this study is 56 years, lower than that reported in developed countries but comparable to figures from third-world nations. This trend may be attributed to the pandemic of diabetes mellitus and smoking in Egypt, potentially associated with metabolic syndrome [22]. Additionally, the clinical profile observed in this study bears similarities to previous findings in Egypt [22]. Consistent with current results, research conducted in HICs and LMICs indicated that women with ACS are typically older than men and have a higher burden of comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes mellitus [3, 23,24,25,26].

Atypical symptoms, more common among women, often go unrecognized as cardiac, leading to delays in management due to socioeconomic factors, literacy levels, and a lack of medical insurance. This delay results in a longer duration from the onset of symptoms to hospital admission, consistent with findings from Sobhy et al. [22], who detected the time elapsed between symptom onset and the initial medical encounter to vary between 30 and 720 min in Egypt. Another study noted that women with ACS tend to report for medical attention later, after symptom onset [4].

Male patients are more frequently prescribed aspirin, ticagrelor, ACEI, and statins compared to females. Jneid et al. [27] observed decreased rates of aspirin administration within the initial 24-hour period among female patients because of non-typical symptoms, leading to delayed recognition of heart attacks in women [28, 29]. It is worth mentioning that female patients with atherosclerotic CVD in a United States study exhibit lower levels of engagement with healthcare providers and underutilization of secondary prevention medications compared to male patients [30].

Among the STEMI subgroup of women who underwent primary PCI (pPCI), door-to-balloon time was longer. This finding matches the studies that revealed that women with STEMI experience primary PCI with longer door-to-balloon delays than males [31].

However, this investigation recorded longer door-to-balloon times than Butala et al. [31], which was 68.91 ± 23.25 min. This may result from different methodologies where Butala et al. collected data from five Egyptian hospitals in Cairo and Alexandria, including two university-affiliated public hospitals, one public hospital affiliated with the Ministry of Health, one private hospital, and one university-affiliated hospital. This confirms the importance of evaluating regional differences, even within the same country.

Regarding revascularization-related interventions, and in contrast to Jneid et al., who noted lower utilization of revascularization procedures among women [27], this research observed no gender differences in the administration of the diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, including primary PCI, consistent with previous results from the Egyptian CardioRisk study [32]. Additionally, all stents used for PCI were drug-eluting stents (DES), in contrast to earlier reports by Sobhy et al. [22], where DES was utilized in only 19.3% of patients and bare metal stents (BMS) in 80.7%.

The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 3.5%, comparable to rates reported in numerous industrialized countries [22]. The in-hospital mortality rate was 2.9%, according to Sobhy et al. [22], and 4.7% in a Greek study [33].

Regarding gender disparities in the prevalence of adverse clinical outcomes, particularly in-hospital cardiac mortality, previous studies have demonstrated conflicting results [4, 34]. While some registries in China [35], Thailand [36], and Malaysia [37] have illustrated no difference in in-hospital mortality, this trial detected poorer in-hospital outcomes for women with worse NYHA classes III and IV and higher rates of in-hospital cardiac mortality.

The higher incidence of in-hospital MACE in women may be attributed to clinical differences. Women with ACS are older at admission, have a greater variety of atypical symptoms and a more significant number of comorbidities, experience delayed admission, are less likely to receive ticagrelor, and have longer door-to-balloon time.

The present findings are partially consistent with previous research by Butala et al., which reported that women in Egypt have a higher incidence of in-hospital mortality. However, unlike the current results, Butala et al. observed a higher 30-day MACE in women [31]. A Middle East and Gulf region study demonstrated higher in-hospital mortality rates in women [37].

A follow-up period of one month did not reveal a statistically significant difference between males and females in terms of unplanned readmissions for heart failure, reinfarction, stroke, and cardiac mortality. The slightly diminished left ventricular EF at discharge (49.56 ± 8.2) and the low rates of unplanned readmissions within 30 days for heart failure and for reinfarction serve as indicators of the effectiveness of the implemented revascularization interventions.

Study limitations

  1. 1.

    The results are derived from a single center.

  2. 2.

    Individuals who passed away before their hospitalization were not included.

  3. 3.

    No data were collected regarding socioeconomic status, income, or level of education, which could potentially account for the disparities observed in treatment and outcomes.

  4. 4.

    Certain physicians might have faced cultural barriers when confronted with sensitive topics like smoking disclosure among female patients.

  5. 5.

    The study lacked information regarding the duration of each cardiovascular risk factor.

Conclusions

The current study suggests that women with ACS in Egypt exhibit a higher risk profile for CVD compared to men and tend to present later with atypical symptoms. Women additionally experience poorer in-hospital MACE and higher cardiac mortality. Therefore, increasing awareness about ACS syndrome and eliminating obstacles that delay hospital admission are imperative.

Data availability

The data supporting the conclusions of this study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

ACS:

Acute coronary syndrome

HICs:

High-income countries

PCI:

Percutaneous coronary intervention

pPCI:

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention

AMI:

Acute myocardial infarction

LMICs:

Low- and middle-income countries

STEMI:

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Non-STEMI:

Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

ECG:

Electrocardiogram

EF:

Ejection fraction

ESC:

European Society of Cardiology

MACE:

Major adverse cardiovascular events

MINOCA:

Myocardial infarction with no obstructive coronary artery disease

CABG:

Coronary artery bypass graft

CVD:

Cardiovascular disease

CCU:

Coronary care unit

DES:

Drug-eluting stents

MI:

Myocardial infarction

References

  1. Hochman JS, Tamis JE, Thompson TD, Weaver WD, White HD, Van de Werf F, et al. Sex, clinical presentation, and outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:226–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berger JS, Elliott L, Gallup D, Roe M, Granger CB, Armstrong PW, et al. Sex differences in mortality following acute coronary syndromes. JAMA. 2009;302:874–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Blomkalns AL, Chen AY, Hochman JS, Peterson ED, Trynosky K, Diercks DB, et al. Gender disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:832–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Walli-Attaei M, Joseph P, Rosengren A, Chow CK, Rangarajan S, Lear SA, et al. Variations between women and men in risk factors, treatments, cardiovascular disease incidence, and death in 27 high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries (PURE): a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;396:97–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Udell JA, Koh M, Qiu F, Austin PC, Wijeysundera HC, Bagai A, et al. Outcomes of women and men with Acute Coronary syndrome treated with and without percutaneous coronary revascularization. J Am Heart Association. 2017;6(1):e004319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Abegunde DO, Mathers CD, Adam T, Ortegon M, Strong K. (2007). The burden and costs of chronic diseases in low-income and middle-income countries. The Lancet. 2007;370(9603):1929–38.

  7. Cader FA, Banerjee S, Gulati M. Sex differences in Acute Coronary syndromes: A Global Perspective. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022;9:239.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Yao H, Ekou A, Niamkey T, Gan SH, Kouamé I, Afassinou Y et al. Acute Coronary syndromes in Sub-saharan Africa: a 10-Year systematic review. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11:e021107.

  9. World Bank Group. (2011) Country and Lending groups. Available: http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-classifications/country-and-lending-groups# Lower_middle_income. Accessibility verified September 14, 2011.

  10. Egypt data | World Health Organization. https://data.who.int/countries/818. Accessed 6 Oct 2023.

  11. Dean AG, Arner TG, Sunki GG, Friedman R, Lantinga M, Sangam S, et al. Epi Info, a database and statistics program for public health professionals. Atlanta, GA, USA: CDC; 2011. p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibrahim MM, Rizk H, Appel LJ, Aroussy WE, Helmy S, Sharaf Y, et al. Hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control in Egypt: results from the Egyptian National Hypertension Project (NHP). Hypertension. 1995;26:886–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mansour H, Reda A, Mena M, Ghaleb R, Elkersh A. Pattern of risk factors and management strategies in patients with acute coronary syndrome, in different age groups and sex categories. Atherosclerosis Supplements. 2017;C:e7–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, Barbato E, Berry C, Chieffo A et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes: developed by the task force on the management of acute coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2023:ehad191.

  15. Reiner Ž, Catapano AL, De Backer G, Graham I, Taskinen M-R, Wiklund O, et al. ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: the Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). Eur Heart J. 2011;32:1769–818.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mancia G, Rosei EA, Azizi M, Burnier M, Clement DL, Coca A, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Hypertension (ESH). Eur Heart J. 2018;39(33):3021–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, et al. Recommendations for Cardiac Chamber quantification by Echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16:233–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Members ATF, Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, Badano LP, Lundqvist CB, Wallentin L, et al. ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the Task Force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2012;33(20):2569–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kikkert WJ, van Vis GN, Baan MM, Koch J. The Prognostic Value of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC)-Defined bleeding complications in ST-Segment Elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:1866–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. DATAtab Team (2024). DATAtab: Online Statistics Calculator. DATAtab e.U. Graz, Austria. https://datatab.net.

  21. Mahajan K, Negi PC, Merwaha R, Mahajan N, Chauhan V, Asotra S. Gender differences in the management of acute coronary syndrome patients: one year results from HPIAR (HP-India ACS Registry). Int J Cardiol. 2017;248:1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sobhy M, Sadaka M, Okasha N, Saleh A, Ismail H, El Seteiha M et al. Stent for Life Initiative placed at the forefront in Egypt 2011. Eurointervention: Journal of Europcr in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2012;8:P108–15.

  23. Gan SC, Beaver SK, Houck PM, MacLehose RF, Lawson HW, Chan L. Treatment of acute myocardial infarction and 30-day mortality among women and men. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:8–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Poon S, Goodman SG, Yan RT, Bugiardini R, Bierman AS, Eagle KA, et al. Bridging the gender gap: insights from a contemporary analysis of sex-related differences in the treatment and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J. 2012;163:66–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Liakos M, Parikh PB. Gender disparities in Presentation, Management, and outcomes of Acute myocardial infarction. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2018;20:64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dey S, Flather MD, Devlin G, Brieger D, Gurfinkel EP, Steg PG, et al. Sex-related differences in the presentation, treatment and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes: the Global Registry of Acute coronary events. Heart. 2009;95:20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jneid H, Fonarow GC, Cannon CP, Hernandez AF, Palacios IF, Maree AO, et al. Sex differences in Medical Care and Early Death after Acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2008;118:2803–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Meischke H, Larsen MP, Eisenberg MS. Gender differences in reported symptoms for acute myocardial infarction: impact on prehospital delay time interval. Am J Emerg Med. 1998;16:363–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Arslanian-Engoren C, Patel A, Fang J, Armstrong D, Kline-Rogers E, Duvernoy CS, et al. Symptoms of men and women presenting with Acute Coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:1177–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Okunrintemi V, Valero-Elizondo J, Patrick B, Salami J, Tibuakuu M, Ahmad S, et al. Gender differences in patient‐reported outcomes among adults with atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease. J Am Heart Association. 2018;7:e010498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Butala NM, Desai MM, Linnander EL, Wong YR, Mikhail DG, Ott LS, et al. Gender differences in presentation, management, and in-hospital outcomes for patients with AMI in a lower-middle income country: evidence from Egypt. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e25904.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Reda A, Ashraf M, Soliman M, Ragy H, Elkersh A, Abdou W, et al. Gender-related differences in risk factors and treatment strategies in patients with acute coronary syndrome across Egypt: part of the Cardio-Risk Project. Atherosclerosis Supplements. 2018;100:e2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kanakakis I, Stafylas P, Tsigkas G, Nikas D, Synetos A, Avramidis D, et al. Epidemiology, reperfusion management, and outcomes of patients with myocardial infarction in Greece: the ILIAKTIS study. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2022;67:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bucholz EM, Butala NM, Rathore SS, Dreyer RP, Lansky AJ, Krumholz HM. Sex differences in Long-Term Mortality after myocardial infarction: a systematic review. Circulation. 2014;130:757–67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Song XT, Chen YD, Pan WQ, Lü SZ. Gender based differences in patients with acute coronary syndrome: findings from Chinese Registry of Acute coronary events (CRACE). Chin Med J. 2007;120(12):1063–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Srichaiveth B, Ruengsakulrach P, Visudharom K, Sanguanwong S, Tangsubutr W, Insamian P. Impact of gender on treatment and clinical outcomes in acute ST elevation myocardial infarction patients in Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai. 2007;90(Suppl 1):65–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lu HT, Nordin R, Ahmad WAW, Lee CY, Zambahari R, Ismail O, et al. Sex differences in acute coronary syndrome in a multiethnic Asian population: results of the Malaysian National Cardiovascular Disease database—acute coronary syndrome (NCVD-ACS) registry. Global Heart. 2014;9:381–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the residents of the department of Cardiovascular Medicine at Tanta University Hospital, Egypt, who exerted great efforts in data collection.

Funding

This research received no specific grants from public, commercial, or not-for-profit funding agencies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M. E. conducted the study design, performed the statistical analysis, and wrote the manuscript. M. K. and H. S. took responsibility for retrieving and compiling relevant articles and revising the data collection. S. E. participated in patient recruitment and reviewed the quality of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed Elbarbary.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study adhered to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Egypt (Ethical approval code: 36264PR395/10/23). Written informed consent was obtained from study participants, and they were provided with a thorough explanation of the study’s objectives and procedures.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elbarbary, M., Shalaby, H.K., Elshokafy, S.M. et al. Gender differences in presentation, management, and outcomes among Egyptian patients with acute coronary syndrome: a single-centre registry. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 24, 364 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-024-03996-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-024-03996-8

Keywords