Skip to main content
Download PDF

Dexmedetomidine ameliorates x-ray-induced myocardial injury via alleviating cardiomyocyte apoptosis and autophagy

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders volume 24, Article number: 323 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Radiotherapy is a primary local treatment for tumors, yet it may lead to complications such as radiation-induced heart disease (RIHD). Currently, there is no standardized approach for preventing RIHD. Dexmedetomidine (Dex) is reported to have cardio-protection effects, while its role in radiation-induced myocardial injury is unknown. In the current study, we aimed to evaluate the radioprotective effect of dexmedetomidine in X-ray radiation-treated mice.

Methods

18 male mice were randomized into 3 groups: control, 16 Gy, and 16 Gy + Dex. The 16 Gy group received a single dose of 16 Gy X-ray radiation. The 16 Gy + Dex group was pretreated with dexmedetomidine (30 µg/kg, intraperitoneal injection) 30 min before X-ray radiation. The control group was treated with saline and did not receive X-ray radiation. Myocardial tissues were collected 16 weeks after X-ray radiation. Hematoxylin-eosin staining was performed for histopathological examination. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling staining was performed to assess the state of apoptotic cells. Immunohistochemistry staining was performed to examine the expression of CD34 molecule and von Willebrand factor. Besides, western blot assay was employed for the detection of apoptosis-related proteins (BCL2 apoptosis regulator and BCL2-associated X) as well as autophagy-related proteins (microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3, beclin 1, and sequestosome 1).

Results

The findings demonstrated that 16 Gy X-ray radiation resulted in significant changes in myocardial tissues, increased myocardial apoptosis, and activated autophagy. Pretreatment with dexmedetomidine significantly protects mice against 16 Gy X-ray radiation-induced myocardial injury by inhibiting apoptosis and autophagy.

Conclusion

In summary, our study confirmed the radioprotective effect of dexmedetomidine in mitigating cardiomyocyte apoptosis and autophagy induced by 16 Gy X-ray radiation.

Peer Review reports

Background

Radiotherapy serves as a crucial adjuvant therapy for patients with cancer, with approximately two-thirds of patients with solid tumors receiving radiotherapy as part of their treatment [1]. However, in addition to targeting tumor cells, radiotherapy has the potential to cause damage to normal tissues or organs [2]. Thoracic radiotherapy-induced damage to myocardium tissue and heart valves is called radiation-induced heart disease (RIDH) [3, 4], with the first documented case of radiotherapy-induced cardiac mortality dating back to 1963 [5]. Recent clinical studies have demonstrated an elevated risk of heart disease-related deaths following radiation therapy [6]. However, up to now, there are still no clear treatment options to prevent or avoid the development of RIHD [7]. Therefore, the prevention and management of RIHD have become urgent clinical problems.

Oxidative stress is the main mechanism in RIHD [4]. Previous studies have demonstrated that reactive oxygen species generated after radiation lead to inflammatory responses, apoptosis, and autophagy [8,9,10]. Among these processes, autophagy serves as an internal waste reduction and recycling system within cells, playing a crucial role in maintaining cell homeostasis and adapting to physiological stress [11]. Due to the different cell types and environments, autophagy shows different functions: protective autophagy and autophagic cell death. On the one hand, autophagy protects tumor cells against radiation-induced cell injury, on the other hand, autophagy induces cell death to improve the radiosensitivity of tumor cells [12]. In myocardial injury, activated autophagy plays a critical role by promoting myocardial injury during ischemia/reperfusion (I/R)-induced myocardial injury [13]. In sepsis-induced myocardial injury, activated autophagy can lead to the induction of inflammation and tissue apoptosis [14]. However, the role of autophagy in radiation-induced myocardial injury has not been reported yet.

Dexmedetomidine (Dex), a highly selective alpha 2-adrenergic receptor agonist, is a widely used agent in clinical anesthesia [15]. Increasing evidence suggests that Dex has protective effects on organ damage caused by radiotherapy. For example, Dex decreases tubular epithelial apoptosis to show a protective effect in X-ray-induced testicular damage [16]. In X-ray radiation-induced parotid damage, Dex acts as a promising antioxidant agent [17]. In addition, the protective effects of Dex are also seen in myocardial injury [18,19,20]. Dex has also been found to be a regulator of autophagy. Through inhibiting autophagy, Dex showed neuroprotective effects in neurological injuries [21]. While Yu et al. found that Dex enhanced autophagy to alleviate the inflammatory responses in liver injury [22]. Therefore, we hypothesized that Dex may play a protective role in radiation-induced myocardial injury, and whether this protective effect is associated with Dex-mediated autophagy needs more studies.

In order to verify our hypothesis, we established the X-ray radiation-induced myocardial injury model in this study. Through in vivo and in vitro experiments, we aimed to confirm whether Dex plays a role in alleviating X-ray radiation-induced myocardial injury by regulating autophagy.

Methods

Mice and experimental protocol

Eighteen male C57BL/6 mice (8–10 weeks old, 20 ± 2 g) were purchased from Shanghai Model Organisms Center, Inc. (Shanghai, China), allowed to access food and water ad libitum and maintained under a 12 h dark/light cycle at 22 °C to 25 °C. These mice were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 6 for each group): control, 16 Gy, and 16 Gy + Dex. Mice in the control group did not receive X-ray radiation or intraperitoneal injection of Dex. Mice in the 16 Gy group were exposed to 6 MV X-ray beam energy with 16 Gy dose (radiation area: the chest includes the heart region; radiation field: 10.6 mm × 15 mm) once on the first day as previously described [23]. Mice in 16 Gy + Dex were given Dex (30 µg/kg, intraperitoneal injection) 30 min before the 16 Gy X-ray radiation (the dose of Dex is referred from previous studies [24, 25]). Besides, mice in the control and 16 Gy group were given saline in a volume equivalent to that given to mice in the 16 Gy + Dex group.

Sixteen weeks later, the mice were anesthetized and sacrificed by cervical dislocation. Their hearts were isolated and fixed in a 10% formaldehyde solution for 24 h. Subsequently, the samples were sectioned to obtain 1.5 mm thick myocardial tissue using a rotary microtome (RM 2016, Leica Biosystems, Germany). After being fixed in 10% formaldehyde solution for 12 h, the sections were embedded in paraffin for hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) staining, immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining, and western blot analysis. All procedures in this study were approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhejiang Cancer Hospital and conducted according to standard institutional guidelines.

HE staining

For histopathological examination, HE staining was used. Briefly, 5 μm thick sections of paraffin-embedded heart tissues were prepared and stained with Mayer’s Hematoxylin (Sigma, St. Louis, USA) for 5 min followed by counterstaining with Eosin for 5 min (Sigma). Subsequently, the sections were dehydrated, sealed, and observed under a microscope (BX53, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

IHC staining

For immunohistochemistry, 4 μm sections of paraffin-embedded heart tissues were deparaffinized, rehydrated, and subjected to antigen retrieval. Subsequently, the sections were incubated with bovine serum albumin, followed by overnight incubation at 4 °C with antibodies against CD34 molecule (CD34, 1:100, ab81289, Abcam, Cambridge, USA) and von Willebrand factor (vWF, 1: 100, ab287962, Abcam). After further washing steps, the sections underwent incubation with a secondary antibody (Abcam) and diaminobenzidine reagent (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark), followed by counterstaining with hematoxylin. Finally, the sections were observed under a microscope (BX53, Olympus). Images were randomly obtained from five fields for each sample. The quantitative analysis was performed by calculating the ratios of integrated optical density to the positive area in Image J2 software (Version 2.14.0/1.54f).

TUNEL staining

To identify myocardial apoptosis, a TUNEL assay was performed. The apoptotic cardiomyocytes were labeled using the colorimetric TUNEL system (Promega, Madison, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The positively stained cells were counted in five randomly selected fields in a blinded manner under microscope.

Cell cultures and treatment

Mouse cardiomyocyte HL-1 was obtained from Procell (Wuhan, China) and maintained in minimum essential medium (MEM, containing non-essential amino acids, Procell) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Procell) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Procell) at 37 °C with 5% CO2.

To simulate X-ray radiation-induced myocardial injury, HL-1 cells were exposed to a single dose of 16 Gy X-ray. To verify the radioprotective of Dex in vitro, 5µM Dex was added to the culture medium before radiation. After 48 h, the cells were collected for subsequent experiments.

Cell viability assay

The cell viability was analyzed using a cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay kit (MedChemExpress, Monmouth Junction, USA). Briefly, cells were seeded in a 96-well plate (10, 000 cells/well) and subjected to different treatments. After 48 h, 10µL CCK-8 solution was added to each well. Following a 2-hour incubation, cell absorbance was detected at 450 nm with a microplate reader (Multiskan MK3, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA).

Flow cytometry

The cell apoptosis was analyzed using an Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) apoptosis detection kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Briefly, cells were incubated with Annexin V-FITC binding buffer and propidium iodide solution. After 20 min, cell apoptosis was detected using flow cytometry (CytoFLEX, Beckman Coulter, Miami, USA).

Western blot analysis

The proteins were extracted from tissues and cells using RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Then, equal amounts of proteins were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes, and separately incubated with the following primary antibodies: BCL2 apoptosis regulator (Bcl-2, AF6139, 1:1000, Affinity, USA), BCL2-associated X (Bax, AF0120, 1:1000, Affinity), microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3, AF5402, 1:1000, Affinity), beclin 1 (Beclin-1, AF5128, 1:1000, Affinity), sequestosome 1 (p62, AF5384, 1:1000, Affinity), and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH, ab9485, 1:1000, Abcam). The membranes were washed and incubated with the corresponding secondary antibody (goat anti-rabbit IgG horseradish peroxidase, S0001, 1:5000, Affinity) for 2 h at 37 °C. Finally, proteins were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (Millipore, USA). Relative protein levels were quantified by densitometry using Image J2 software.

Statistical analysis

Each experiment was repeated at least three times and data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed in GraphPad software (version 9.5). The post hoc power was calculated with the G*Power (version 3.1.9.2). Normality was assessed using Shapiro-Wilk tests and equal variances were assessed using the Brown-Forsythe test. Differences among the three groups were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance with Tukey’s post hoc test. The significance level was set at 0.05.

Results

Effects of dexmedetomidine on myocardial pathological injuries of x-ray-induced myocardial injury mice

We first observe the histopathological changes by HE staining. As shown in Fig. 1, in the control group, there was no exudation or hyperemia edema in the myocardial tissues. The muscle fibers displayed a normal arrangement and a distinct structure. In the 16 Gy group, the myocardial tissue demonstrated widened myocardial space, disordered muscle fiber arrangement, indistinct transverse stripes, and fibrin exudation. The morphology of myocardial tissues in 16 Gy + Dex group was close to that of the control group, suggesting that Dex pretreatment could alleviate the tissue deterioration. We also noted that 16 Gy X-ray radiation caused the thickening of the epicardium, which was mitigated by Dex pretreatment (arrows in Fig. 1). These findings suggested that Dex could alleviate the 16 Gy X-ray radiation-induced myocardial injury in mice.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Representative images of Hematoxylin-Eosin staining results. HE staining of the epicardium and myocardial tissues of mice at 16 weeks after radiation. Upper: epicardial thickness in each group (red arrows); Lower: histological changes in each group. After 16 Gy X-ray radiation, the epicardial thickness increased and the myocardial tissue showed extensive fibrous thickening. Dex pretreatment restored epicardial thickness and myocardium structure. n = 6 for each group. Dex: dexmedetomidine. Scale bar: 50 μm

Full size image

Effects of dexmedetomidine on vascular endothelial cells injury of x-ray-induced myocardial injury mice

To further investigate the microvasculature damage, the expression of CD34 and vWF was evaluated by IHC staining. CD34 and vWF are endothelial markers and could reflect endothelial cell damage [26,27,28]. Analysis of the IHC staining results showed higher expression of CD34 and vWF in the 16 Gy group compared to the control group, suggesting that 16 Gy X-ray radiation could induce vascular endothelial cell injury. However, Dex pretreatment significantly attenuated the 16 Gy X-ray radiation-induced upregulation of CD34 and vWF in myocardial tissues (Fig. 2A-B). These findings suggested that Dex exerts a protective effect on X-ray-induced vascular endothelial cell injury.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Representative images of immunofluorescence staining results. Immunohistochemistry staining for CD34 molecule (CD34) and von Willebrand factor (vWF) in myocardial tissues and quantification of CD34 (A) and vWF (B) expression levels in myocardial tissues. The expression of CD34 and vWF is increased when the microvascular structure is damaged, which can be used as biomarkers for endothelial cell injury. n = 6 for each group. Dex: dexmedetomidine; IOD: integrated optical density. Scale bar: 50 μm. Data were represented as mean ± standard deviation, ** P < 0.01 vs. control group, ## P < 0.01 vs. 16 Gy group. For CD34 quantification analysis, effect size = 4.23, power = 1; For vWF quantification analysis, effect size = 2.57, power = 1

Full size image

Effects of dexmedetomidine on myocardial apoptosis of x-ray-induced myocardial injury mice

Next, we detected the protective effect of Dex on myocardial apoptosis. TUNEL staining results showed an upregulation of TUNEL-positive cells in myocardial tissues following exposure to 16 Gy X-ray, indicating heightened myocardial apoptosis. However, mice pretreated with Dex in the 16 Gy + Dex group exhibited a reduction in TUNEL-positive cells compared to those in the 16 Gy group (Fig. 3A). Western blot results further confirmed the effects of Dex on cell apoptosis. The expression of pro-apoptosis protein Bax was upregulated by 16 Gy X-ray treatment, and Dex pretreatment suppressed the Bax expression. Oppositely, the expression of anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 was downregulated by 16 Gy X-ray treatment, and Dex pretreatment promoted the Bax expression (Fig. 3B). These results indicated that dexmedetomidine exerts radioprotective effects through attenuation of cell apoptosis.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effects of dexmedetomidine on regulating myocardial apoptosis. (A) Representative images and quantitative analysis of TUNEL staining results. The TUNEL-positive cells were shown by red arrows. ** P < 0.01 vs. control group, ## P < 0.01 vs. 16 Gy group; effect size = 10.81, power = 1.00. (B) Western blot analysis and densitometry quantification of the protein expression of BCL2 apoptosis regulator (Bcl-2) and BCL2-associated X (Bax). ** P < 0.01 vs. control group, ## P < 0.01 vs. 16 Gy group. For Bcl-2 quantification analysis, effect size = 2.57, power = 1; for Bax quantification analysis, effect size = 5.99, power = 1. n = 6 for each group. Dex: dexmedetomidine. Scale bar: 50 μm. Data were represented as mean ± standard deviation

Full size image

Effects of dexmedetomidine on autophagy in x-ray-induced myocardial injury mice

As previously reported, autophagy is crucially involved in the protective effect of Dex [29]. In this study, we detected the expression of autophagy-related proteins LC3, Beclin-1, and p62 through western blot assay. Compared with the control group, our results showed that exposure to 16 Gy X-ray radiation promoted the Beclin-1 expression and increased the LC3 II/I ratio, while concurrently downregulating p62 expression. Dex pretreatment inhibited the Beclin-1 expression and reduced the LC3 II/I ratio, while promoting the p62 expression (Fig. 4). These results indicated that the radioprotective effects of dexmedetomidine were partially due to autophagy inhibition.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Western blot analysis and densitometry quantification of the protein expression of Beclin-1, LC3, and p62. Representative western blot and the quantitative analysis of the autophagy-related proteins beclin 1 (Beclin-1), microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3), and sequestosome 1 (p62). ** P < 0.01 vs. control group, ## P < 0.01 vs. 16 Gy group. For Beclin-1 quantification analysis, effect size = 8.68, power = 1; for LC3 quantification analysis, effect size = 5.01, power = 1; for p62 quantification analysis, effect size = 5.35, power = 1. n = 6 for each group n = 6 for each group. Dex: dexmedetomidine. Data were represented as mean ± standard deviation

Full size image

Effects of dexmedetomidine on cell viability, apoptosis, and autophagy in x-ray-treated cardiomyocyte

We then verified the radioprotective effects of Dex in vitro. The cell viability was detected through a CCK-8 assay. As shown in Fig. 5A, cell viability was reduced in the 16 Gy group compared to the control group. However, pretreatment with Dex reversed the radiation-induced suppression of cell viability caused by 16 Gy X-ray. Conversely, treatment with 16 Gy X-rays led to an increase in the rate of cell apoptosis, which was mitigated by Dex pretreatment (Fig. 5B). Western blot analysis revealed upregulation of Beclin-1 expression and LC3 II/I ratio, as well as downregulation of p62 expression in the 16 Gy group compared to the control group. Notably, Dex pretreatment decreased Beclin-1 expression and LC3 II/I ratio, while promoting p62 expression (Fig. 5C). These findings confirmed that the radioprotective effects of dexmedetomidine were through regulating apoptosis and autophagy in vitro.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effects of dexmedetomidine in X-ray-treated cardiomyocytes. (A) CCK-8 assay was applied to detect cell viability. ** P < 0.01 vs. control group, ## P < 0.01 vs. 16 Gy group; effect size = 8.03, power = 1 (B) Flow cytometry was used to detect cell apoptosis. ** P < 0.01 vs. control group, ## P < 0.01 vs. 16 Gy group; effect size = 10.87, power = 1 (C) Western blot analysis and densitometry quantification of the protein expression of beclin 1 (Beclin-1), microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3), and sequestosome 1 (p62). ** P < 0.01 vs. control group, ## P < 0.01 vs. 16 Gy group. For Beclin-1 quantification analysis, effect size = 6.68, power = 1; for LC3 quantification analysis, effect size = 8.89, power = 1; for p62 quantification analysis, effect size = 9.97, power = 1. Dex: dexmedetomidine. Data were represented as mean ± standard deviation

Full size image

Discussion

This study was conducted to investigate the role of Dex in X-ray radiation-induced myocardial injury. Through animal and cell experiments, we found that Dex pretreatment suppressed cardiomyocyte apoptosis and ameliorated the X-ray radiation-induced myocardial injury. Furthermore, we found that the radioprotective role of Dex was related to the inhibition of autophagy.

In recent years, radiotherapy has emerged as a crucial modality for cancer treatment. However, exposure of the chest to radiation can lead to damage in vascular endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes, and this damage is related to the radiation type and dose [30]. Clinical studies revealed that 1–4 Gy radiation promotes the development of cardiovascular diseases and inflammation, 4–8 Gy radiation increases the possibility of myocardial infarction, and > 8 Gy radiation causes myocardial fibrosis [31,32,33,34]. In an animal study, it was found that cardiac radiation exposure (10–20 Gy) resulted in cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, and myocardial fibrosis [35]. Consistent with previous studies, our results showed that 16 Gy X-ray radiation resulted in the thickening of the epicardium and disorder of myocardial fiber arrangement. In addition, we performed the IHC staining to detect the CD34 and vWF expression in myocardial tissues. CD34 is an adhesion molecule belonging to the cadherin family. It can be selectively expressed on the surface of hematopoietic stem cells and acts as a major molecule involved in many pathophysiological processes such as intercellular signaling, immune response, inflammation, and coagulation [36]. vWF is produced and secreted by vascular megakaryocytes and endothelial cells and is involved in hemostasis [37]. In cases of endothelial cell injury, there is an elevation in plasma vWF levels [38]. Furthermore, with progressive vascular leakage leading to microvascular structural damage, the expressions of CD34 and vWF are upregulated as indicators of endothelial cell damage [26,27,28]. Herein, we found that both CD34 and vWF expression were upregulated by 16 Gy X-ray radiation, suggesting the occurrence of vascular endothelial cell injury.

The heart is an organ with high oxygen consumption, and cardiomyocytes contain a large number of mitochondria [35]. In the process of radiation-induced damage, mitochondria are particularly susceptible [39]. A previous study revealed that radiation-induced mitochondria damage could induce cell apoptosis, which is an important pathological mechanism in radiation-induced tissue damage [40, 41]. Here, through TUNEL staining, we confirmed that 16 Gy X-ray radiation facilitated cardiomyocyte apoptosis. Besides, mitochondrial damage is related to changes in levels of Bax and Bcl-2 [42]. Bax and Bcl-2 are two important genes in regulating apoptosis. The ratio between Bax/Bcl-2 proteins was a key factor in promoting apoptosis [43]. In this study, we found that 16 Gy X-ray radiation promoted Bax expression while inhibiting Bcl-2 expression, which was consistent with the previous research [44].

Besides promoting apoptosis, mitochondrial damage may also lead to autophagy activation [4]. The function of autophagy in myocardial injury has been controversial. Chen et al. found that autophagy is activated in myocardial I/R injury [45]. Xing et al. found that autophagy is blocked in myocardial I/R injury, and autophagy restoring rescues heart function [46]. The reason for this contradiction may be the two sides of autophagy. Under normal circumstances, autophagy can degrade damaged organelles and harmful proteins to recover nutrients and generate energy, thus promoting cell and tissue survival. However, with the increase of the stimulation intensity or time, the level of basal autophagy will gradually increase to form excessive autophagy, which leads to impaired cell function and autophagic death [47]. In this study, under 16 Gy X-ray radiation, Beclin-1 expression and LC3 II/I ratio increased, while the p62 expression decreased. These results suggested that autophagy was active in 16 Gy X-ray radiation-induced myocardial injury.

Dex is currently used for its excellent sedation and analgesia with minimal cardiovascular effects [48]. Previous research has clarified the important role of Dex in myocardial injury. Through reducing ferroptosis, Dex alleviates sepsis‑induced myocardial cellular injury [49]. Another study presented that Dex pretreatment attenuates myocardial I/R injury by relieving endoplasmic reticulum stress [50]. Wu et al. found that Dex protects against myocardial I/R injury via ameliorating oxidative stress and cell apoptosis [51]. However, no previous studies have examined the effectiveness of Dex in protecting radiation-induced myocardial injury, which this study demonstrates. By pretreatment with Dex, the myocardial injury and apoptosis induced by 16 Gy X-ray were attenuated. Furthermore, we found that the protective effect of Dex on X-ray radiation-induced myocardial injury was through inhibiting autophagy. As Dex has been extensively used in clinical practice [52], our data may extend the possibility of using Dex for radiation-induced myocardial injury.

Some limitations of the current study should be admitted. First, only 6 mice were used in each group because of insufficient expenditure. The small sample size reduced the statistical power of the study results. To overcome this limitation, the post hoc power of the results was calculated and was high. Second, we did not test other treatment doses or duration of Dex. Whether Dex pretreatment displays a dose- or time-dependent effect deserves further clarification. Third, our study did not include a molecular mechanism investigation. Li et al. found that dexmedetomidine activates the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/protein kinase B/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway to attenuate autophagy in cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury [53]. Another study reported that dexmedetomidine decreases reactive oxygen species production and nuclear factor kappa-B proteins to inhibit the activation of autophagy in traumatic brain injury [54]. These results provide possible molecular mechanisms for the inhibition of autophagy by dexmedetomidine in radiation-induced myocardial injury, which will be investigated in further studies.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated that dexmedetomidine protected against 16 Gy X-ray radiation-induced myocardial injury by inhibiting apoptosis and autophagy. Our results may provide a new approach to the prevention of radiation-induced heart disease.

Data availability

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

RIHD:

radiation-induced heart disease

Dex:

dexmedetomidine

I/R:

ischemia/reperfusion

HE:

hematoxylin-eosin

TUNEL:

terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling

IHC:

immunohistochemistry

RM:

rotary microtome

CD34:

CD34 molecule

vWF:

von Willebrand factor

MEM:

minimum essential medium

FBS:

fetal bovine serum

CCK-8:

cell counting kit-8

FITC:

fluorescein isothiocyanate

Bcl-2:

BCL2 apoptosis regulator

Bax:

BCL2-associated X

LC3:

light chain 3

Beclin-1:

beclin 1

References

  1. Ruckert M, Flohr AS, Hecht M, Gaipl US. Radiotherapy and the immune system: more than just immune suppression. Stem Cells. 2021;39(9):1155–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Banfill K, Giuliani M, Aznar M, Franks K, McWilliam A, Schmitt M, Sun F, Vozenin MC. Faivre Finn C, committee IART: Cardiac Toxicity of thoracic radiotherapy: existing evidence and future directions. J Thorac Oncol. 2021;16(2):216–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Heidenreich PA, Kapoor JR. Radiation induced heart disease: systemic disorders in heart disease. Heart. 2009;95(3):252–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ping Z, Peng Y, Lang H, Xinyong C, Zhiyi Z, Xiaocheng W, Hong Z, Liang S. Oxidative Stress in Radiation-Induced Cardiotoxicity. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2020, 2020:3579143.

  5. Rubin E, Camara J, Grayzel DM, Zak FG. Radiation-induced cardiac fibrosis. Am J Med. 1963;34:71–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Laugaard Lorenzen E, Christian Rehammar J, Jensen MB, Ewertz M, Brink C. Radiation-induced risk of ischemic heart disease following breast cancer radiotherapy in Denmark, 1977–2005. Radiother Oncol. 2020;152:103–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sarkozy M, Varga Z, Gaspar R, Szucs G, Kovacs MG, Kovacs ZZA, Dux L, Kahan Z, Csont T. Pathomechanisms and therapeutic opportunities in radiation-induced heart disease: from bench to bedside. Clin Res Cardiol. 2021;110(4):507–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Tapio S. Pathology and biology of radiation-induced cardiac disease. J Radiat Res. 2016;57(5):439–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Taunk NK, Haffty BG, Kostis JB, Goyal S. Radiation-induced heart disease: pathologic abnormalities and putative mechanisms. Front Oncol. 2015;5:39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Slezak J, Kura B, Babal P, Barancik M, Ferko M, Frimmel K, Kalocayova B, Kukreja RC, Lazou A, Mezesova L, et al. Potential markers and metabolic processes involved in the mechanism of radiation-induced heart injury. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2017;95(10):1190–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mizushima N, Komatsu M. Autophagy: renovation of cells and tissues. Cell. 2011;147(4):728–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gao L, Zheng H, Cai Q, Wei L. Autophagy and Tumour Radiotherapy. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1207:375–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen HY, Xiao ZZ, Ling X, Xu RN, Zhu P, Zheng SY. ELAVL1 is transcriptionally activated by FOXC1 and promotes ferroptosis in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury by regulating autophagy. Mol Med. 2021;27(1):14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Li T, Chen Y, Li Y, Yao Z, Liu W. FAM134B-mediated endoplasmic reticulum autophagy protects against sepsis myocardial injury in mice. Aging. 2021;13(10):13535–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Weerink MAS, Struys M, Hannivoort LN, Barends CRM, Absalom AR, Colin P. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of Dexmedetomidine. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017;56(8):893–913.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Dil E, Tumkaya L, Mercantepe T, Rakici S, Yilmaz A, Celik Samanci T, Yazici ZA. Radioprotective effects of dexmedetomidine on x-ray-induced testicular damage. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023;27(2):673–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Safak G, Celiker M, Tumkaya L, Mercantepe T, Rakici S, Cinar S, Yilmaz A, Terzi S, Demir E, Celebi Erdivanli O, et al. Comparison of effects of dexmedetomidine and amifostine against X-ray radiation-induced parotid damage. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2022;61(2):241–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu C, Xu R. Dexmedetomidine protects H9C2 rat cardiomyocytes against hypoxia/reoxygenation injury by regulating the long non-coding RNA colon cancer-associated transcript 1/microRNA-8063/Wnt/beta-catenin axis. Bioengineered. 2022;13(5):13300–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang L, Wang S, Jia T, Sun X, Xing Z, Liu H, Yao J, Chen Y. Dexmedetomidine prevents cardiomyocytes from hypoxia/reoxygenation injury via modulating tetmethylcytosine dioxygenase 1-mediated DNA demethylation of Sirtuin1. Bioengineered. 2022;13(4):9369–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Yu P, Zhang J, Ding Y, Chen D, Sun H, Yuan F, Li S, Li X, Yang P, Fu L, et al. Dexmedetomidine post-conditioning alleviates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats by ferroptosis inhibition via SLC7A11/GPX4 axis activation. Hum Cell. 2022;35(3):836–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hu Y, Zhou H, Zhang H, Sui Y, Zhang Z, Zou Y, Li K, Zhao Y, Xie J, Zhang L. The neuroprotective effect of dexmedetomidine and its mechanism. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:965661.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Yu Q, Zou L, Yuan X, Fang F, Xu F. Dexmedetomidine protects against Septic Liver Injury by enhancing Autophagy through activation of the AMPK/SIRT1 Signaling Pathway. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:658677.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Tianxiao F, Juying Z, Yang J. Establishment of irradiation induced heart injury in C57 mice model and identification of serum marker. Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Anhui. 2015;50(7):922–924925.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jang Y, Yeom MY, Kang ES, Kang JW, Song HK. The antinociceptive effect of dexmedetomidine modulates spleen cell immunity in mice. Int J Med Sci. 2014;11(3):226–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang L, Xiao F, Zhang J, Wang X, Ying J, Wei G, Chen S, Huang X, Yu W, Liu X, et al. Dexmedetomidine mitigated NLRP3-Mediated Neuroinflammation via the ubiquitin-autophagy pathway to improve Perioperative Neurocognitive Disorder in mice. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:646265.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Rakocevic J, Orlic D, Mitrovic-Ajtic O, Tomasevic M, Dobric M, Zlatic N, Milasinovic D, Stankovic G, Ostojic M, Labudovic-Borovic M. Endothelial cell markers from clinician’s perspective. Exp Mol Pathol. 2017;102(2):303–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Seemann I, Gabriels K, Visser NL, Hoving S, te Poele JA, Pol JF, Gijbels MJ, Janssen BJ, van Leeuwen FW, Daemen MJ, et al. Irradiation induced modest changes in murine cardiac function despite progressive structural damage to the myocardium and microvasculature. Radiother Oncol. 2012;103(2):143–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Boerma M, Kruse JJ, van Loenen M, Klein HR, Bart CI, Zurcher C, Wondergem J. Increased deposition of Von Willebrand factor in the rat heart after local ionizing irradiation. Strahlenther Onkol. 2004;180(2):109–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao S, Wu W, Lin X, Shen M, Yang Z, Yu S, Luo Y. Protective effects of dexmedetomidine in vital organ injury: crucial roles of autophagy. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2022;27(1):34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Puukila S, Lemon JA, Lees SJ, Tai TC, Boreham DR, Khaper N. Impact of Ionizing Radiation on the Cardiovascular System: a review. Radiat Res. 2017;188(42):539–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Weintraub NL, Jones WK, Manka D. Understanding radiation-induced vascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(12):1237–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Russell NS, Hoving S, Heeneman S, Hage JJ, Woerdeman LA, de Bree R, Lohuis PJ, Smeele L, Cleutjens J, Valenkamp A, et al. Novel insights into pathological changes in muscular arteries of radiotherapy patients. Radiother Oncol. 2009;92(3):477–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Carr ZA, Land CE, Kleinerman RA, Weinstock RW, Stovall M, Griem ML, Mabuchi K. Coronary heart disease after radiotherapy for peptic ulcer disease. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;61(3):842–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yusuf SW, Sami S, Daher IN. Radiation-induced heart disease: a clinical update. Cardiol Res Pract. 2011;2011:317659.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Saiki H, Moulay G, Guenzel AJ, Liu W, Decklever TD, Classic KL, Pham L, Chen HH, Burnett JC, Russell SJ, et al. Experimental cardiac radiation exposure induces ventricular diastolic dysfunction with preserved ejection fraction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2017;313(2):H392–407.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Radu P, Zurzu M, Paic V, Bratucu M, Garofil D, Tigora A, Georgescu V, Prunoiu V, Pasnicu C, Popa F et al. CD34-Structure, functions and relationship with Cancer Stem cells. Med (Kaunas) 2023, 59(5).

  37. Peyvandi F, Garagiola I, Baronciani L. Role of Von Willebrand factor in the haemostasis. Blood Transfus. 2011;9(Suppl 2):s3–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Muller O, Bartunek J, Hamilos M, Berza CT, Mangiacapra F, Ntalianis A, Vercruysse K, Duby C, Wijns W, De Bruyne B, et al. Von Willebrand factor inhibition improves endothelial function in patients with stable angina. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2013;6(3):364–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Azimzadeh O, Scherthan H, Sarioglu H, Barjaktarovic Z, Conrad M, Vogt A, Calzada-Wack J, Neff F, Aubele M, Buske C, et al. Rapid proteomic remodeling of cardiac tissue caused by total body ionizing radiation. Proteomics. 2011;11(16):3299–311.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Vona R, Gambardella L, Cittadini C, Straface E, Pietraforte D. Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress in Metabolic Syndrome and Associated Diseases. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2019, 2019:8267234.

  41. Johnson S, Shaikh SB, Muneesa F, Rashmi B, Bhandary YP. Radiation induced apoptosis and pulmonary fibrosis: curcumin an effective intervention? Int J Radiat Biol. 2020;96(6):709–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang H, Wei J, Zheng Q, Meng L, Xin Y, Yin X, Jiang X. Radiation-induced heart disease: a review of classification, mechanism and prevention. Int J Biol Sci. 2019;15(10):2128–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Edlich F. BCL-2 proteins and apoptosis: recent insights and unknowns. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;500(1):26–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Sridharan V, Aykin-Burns N, Tripathi P, Krager KJ, Sharma SK, Moros EG, Corry PM, Nowak G, Hauer-Jensen M, Boerma M. Radiation-induced alterations in mitochondria of the rat heart. Radiat Res. 2014;181(3):324–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Huang T, Cai M, Chen C, Ling C, Zhang B, Zheng W, Luo L. LINC01116 boosts the progression of pituitary adenoma via regulating miR-744-5p/HOXB8 pathway. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2021;536:111350.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Xing Y, Sui Z, Liu Y, Wang MM, Wei X, Lu Q, Wang X, Liu N, Lu C, Chen R, et al. Blunting TRPML1 channels protects myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury by restoring impaired cardiomyocyte autophagy. Basic Res Cardiol. 2022;117(1):20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sridhar S, Botbol Y, Macian F, Cuervo AM. Autophagy and disease: always two sides to a problem. J Pathol. 2012;226(2):255–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Keating GM. Dexmedetomidine: a review of its use for Sedation in the Intensive Care setting. Drugs. 2015;75(10):1119–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Wang C, Yuan W, Hu A, Lin J, Xia Z, Yang CF, Li Y, Zhang Z. Dexmedetomidine alleviated sepsis–induced myocardial ferroptosis and septic heart injury. Mol Med Rep. 2020;22(1):175–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Tang C, Hu Y, Gao J, Jiang J, Shi S, Wang J, Geng Q, Liang X, Chai X. Dexmedetomidine pretreatment attenuates myocardial ischemia reperfusion induced acute kidney injury and endoplasmic reticulum stress in human and rat. Life Sci. 2020;257:118004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Wu ZL, Davis JRJ, Zhu Y. Dexmedetomidine Protects against Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury by Ameliorating Oxidative Stress and Cell Apoptosis through the Trx1-Dependent Akt Pathway. Biomed Res Int 2020, 2020:8979270.

  52. Kong H, Li M, Deng CM, Wu YJ, He ST, Mu DL. A comprehensive overview of clinical research on dexmedetomidine in the past 2 decades: a bibliometric analysis. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1043956.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Li J, Wang K, Liu M, He J, Zhang H, Liu H. Dexmedetomidine alleviates cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury via inhibiting autophagy through PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. J Mol Histol. 2023;54(3):173–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Feng X, Ma W, Zhu J, Jiao W, Wang Y. Dexmedetomidine alleviates early brain injury following traumatic brain injury by inhibiting autophagy and neuroinflammation through the ROS/Nrf2 signaling pathway. Mol Med Rep 2021, 24(3).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by Zhejiang Province Medical Science and Technology Project (Grant numbers 2020KY485 and 2021KY089) and Zhejiang Traditional Chinese Medicine Science and Technology Plan (Grant numbers 2023ZL021 and 2023ZL302).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, No. 1 East Banshan Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310022, China

    Runze Zhang, Kangjie Xie, Yanhong Lian, Shufang Hong & Yuntian Zhu

Authors
  1. Runze Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kangjie Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yanhong Lian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shufang Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yuntian Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Study design and data collection were performed by RZZ, KJX, YHL and YTZ. Data analysis was performed by RZZ, KJX and SFH. The first draft of the manuscript was written by RZZ.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuntian Zhu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The design and development of animal experiments involved in this study were conducted according to the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) guidelines and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Zhejiang Cancer Hospital Research Ethics Committee (approval no. zjzlsd-2020-07-017).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, R., Xie, K., Lian, Y. et al. Dexmedetomidine ameliorates x-ray-induced myocardial injury via alleviating cardiomyocyte apoptosis and autophagy. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 24, 323 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-024-03988-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-024-03988-8

Keywords

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2261

Contact us