Skip to main content
Download PDF

Factor Xa inhibitors versus vitamin K antagonist in morbidly obese patients with venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders volume 23, Article number: 100 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction

Guidelines have endorsed non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), consisting of factor Xa inhibitors (xabans) and direct thrombin inhibitors, as the first line of treatment in venous thromboembolism (VTE) and atrial fibrillation. However, morbidly obese patients were under-represented in landmark trials of NOACs. Therefore, this study aimed to systematically review and perform a meta-analysis of studies on xabans versus vitamin K antagonist (VKA) in this high-risk population with VTE.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane library, and Google Scholar databases were searched to identify studies that compared xabans and VKA in treating morbidly obese patients with VTE. Morbid obesity was defined as body weight ≥ 120 kg or BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2. Outcomes of interest included recurrent VTE, major bleeding, and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB).

Results

Eight studies comprising 30,895 patients were included. A total of 12,755 patients received xabans while 18,140 received VKAs. No significant difference in the odds of recurrent VTE (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.55–1.01) and CRNMB (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.44–1.09) was observed between the xabans group and the VKA group. However, the xabans group was associated with lower odds of major bleeding (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.59–0.83).

Conclusion

Xabans have lower odds of major bleeding but similar odds of recurrent VTE when compared with VKAs in treating VTE in morbidly obese patients. Large registry analyses or future randomized controlled trials will be helpful in confirming these findings.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have revolutionized the anticoagulation therapies which were largely reliant on heparin derived agents and warfarin until 2009 [1]. These newer agents have fewer dietary and drug interactions, less fatal bleeding, and do not need significant monitoring of drug levels [2]. With consistent results across the population in large scale studies, NOACs are recommended as the agent of choice in prominent clinical guidelines in treating venous thromboembolism (VTE) and atrial fibrillation (AF) [3, 4].

The safety and efficacy of NOACs in obesity is poorly understood. Reduced peak levels due to underdosing, shorter half-lives, and increased volume of distribution in those with higher body weight are few of the concerns raised with use of NOACs in obese patients. The prevalence of obesity in the United States was 42.4% (2017–2018) and is predicted to increase to nearly 50% by 2030, with almost one in four adults at risk of severe obesity [5, 6]. With limited representation of obese patients in published studies, International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) did not previously recommend the use of NOACs in patients with body mass index (BMI) > 40 kg/m2 or weight > 120 kg [7]. While the phase III trials of NOACs included subgroup analysis of obese patients, their sample sizes were relatively small and mostly limited to BMI and weight cutoff at > 35 kg/m2 and > 100 kg, respectively [7]. However, with emerging data from largely observational studies, ISTH provided a guideline update suggesting use of standard dose rivaroxaban and apixaban for VTE treatment regardless of obesity [8].

NOACs typically refer to four drugs: one oral direct thrombin inhibitor—dabigatran, and three oral factor Xa inhibitors (xabans)—rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban [9]. Xabans are favored more over direct thrombin inhibitors due better availability, once-daily dosing (rivaroxaban), approval in chronic kidney disease or end-stage renal disease (apixaban), and cost [8, 10,11,12]. The objective of this study is to perform a systematic review and updated meta-analysis examining the effect and safety of xabans in comparison to the traditionally used vitamin K antagonist (VKA) in treating VTE in patients with high BMI or weight.

Methods

Search strategy and inclusion criteria

This systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline [13]. Two independent authors (D.P. and S.A.) searched relevant literatures in PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane library, and Google Scholar published up to January 31, 2022. The following keywords were used for disease: “venous thromboembolism”, “morbid obesity”, “morbidly obese”, “obesity”, and “obese”. To define exposure, the following keywords were used: “oral anticoagulants”, “xabans”, “rivaroxaban”, “apixaban”, “edoxaban”, “vitamin K antagonist”, and “warfarin”. Studies written in English were reviewed to select eligible studies on xabans versus VKA on VTE recurrence, major bleeding, and CRNMB. Additional studies were also manually searched through the references cited in reviews. Randomized clinical trials and cohort studies were included as original articles. For studies with duplicative population, the study with more comprehensive data was selected. The following studies were excluded: studies that did not report outcome in morbidly obese patients, studies that included dabigatran in the case group, studies that did not have those taking VKA in the control group, and review articles. The study protocol has been published online: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/9NK63.

Definition of outcomes

In this study, morbid obesity was defined as BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 or body weight ≥ 120 kg. The cut-off of 120 kg in defining morbid obesity was used in accordance with the ISTH guidelines and many previous studies [8, 14,15,16]. VTE recurrence was defined as new or worsening deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism proven by imaging studies or clinical judgment. Occurrences of bleeding were classified using the criteria set by ISTH. Major bleeding was defined as symptomatic manifestation with fatal bleeding, bleeding in a critical area or organ, hemoglobin drop ≥ 2 g/dL, or blood transfusion ≥ 2 units [17]. Clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) was defined by bleeding requiring medical encounter, care, or intervention, but not meeting the criteria for major bleeding [17].

Assessment of bias

Funnel plot showing the scatter plot of the odds ratio against the standard error in a logarithmic scale was performed to evaluate for publication bias, after which Begg-Mazumdar and Egger tests were applied whose P-value < 0.05 indicates statistically significant publication bias. Other potential biases in the selected studies were evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale, which awards points to 9 different items distributed among categories of case–control selection, comparability, and outcome, and signifies less risk of bias with higher overall scores [18]. Quality of evidence in the integrated outcomes were assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) criteria [19].

Statistical analysis

Integrated odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were generated by applying random effects model based on the DerSimonian-Laird method. The consistent use of random effects model was preplanned given the relatively fewer number of studies and the expected heterogeneity among the trials. To assess the heterogeneity of the studies, Higgins and Thompson’s I2 statistics were calculated. The I2 measure ranges from 0 to 100%, which suggests that less than 50%, 50–74%, and over 75% is considered as low, moderate, and substantial heterogeneity, respectively. Two sensitivity analyses were performed: one excluding studies with high risk of bias, and another excluding studies that used body weight ≥ 120 kg instead of BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 to define morbid obesity. All statistical analyses were conducted using the meta package in R version 4.0.2.

Results

Included studies

Initial search of literature identified 1,102 studies, of which 1,094 were excluded after examining the title, abstract, and full text (Fig. 1). Eight studies were selected in the final analysis: 1 post hoc analysis [14] and 7 retrospective cohort studies [15, 20,21,22,23,24,25]. Two studies originally [20, 21] included patients with BMI > 30 kg/m2, so data from their subgroup analyses of patients with BMI > 40 kg/m2 were used.

Fig. 1
figure 1

PRISMA flow diagram for studies comparing factor Xa inhibitors and vitamin K antagonist. This figure illustrates the search process conducted to identify studies meeting the inclusion criteria in accordance with PRISMA guidelines

Full size image

Risk of bias

Funnel plot analysis of the included studies showed no evidence of publication bias on the effect of xabans compared to VKA (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Other potential biases were evaluated to be low to moderate primarily because of inadequacy of outcomes and compromised comparability (Additional file 1: Table S1). Sa et al. [24] and Cohen et al. [20] had the highest risk of bias. These biases, in addition to moderate imprecision due to paucity of included studies, moderate inconsistencies due to heterogeneities, and moderate indirectness due to suboptimal comparability, led to moderate, instead of high, GRADE ratings (Additional file 1: Table S2). PRISMA checklist can be found in Additional file 1: Table S3.

Characteristics

Main characteristics and demographics of the studies are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. Inclusion and exclusion criteria applied in the studies are shown in Additional file 1: Table S4. A total of 30,895 patients were studied, with 12,755 patients (41.3%) receiving xabans and 18,140 patients (58.7%) receiving VKAs. Three studies [15, 21, 25] solely included patients who received rivaroxaban in the case group, while 3 studies [14, 20, 22] included only those who received apixaban. The remaining 2 studies [23, 24] included different proportions of rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban.

Table 1 Main characteristics of selected studies in the meta-analysis
Full size table
Table 2 Demographics of the studies
Full size table

Outcomes

VTE recurred in 2.4% (308 of 12,755) of patients who took xabans and in 3.1% (590 of 18,140) of those who took VKAs. The difference in VTE recurrences between the 2 groups was not statistically significant (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.55–1.01, p = 0.06) (Fig. 2). The heterogeneity was moderate (I2 = 57%), and the quality of evidence was moderate (Additional file 1: Table S2). Sensitivity analysis excluding studies with high risk of bias yielded similar results (Additional file 1: Figure S2). Additional sensitivity analysis excluding studies that defined morbid obesity as body weight ≥ 120 kg instead of BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 also produced similar results (Additional file 1: Figure S3). Major bleeding occurred in 1.6% (200 of 12,755) of the xaban group and in 2.2% (408 of 18,140) of the VKA group. The odds of major bleeding were lower in the former group (OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.59–0.83, p < 0.01) (Fig. 3). The heterogeneity was minimal (I2 = 0%), and the quality of evidence was moderate. Only four studies reported CRNMB, which occurred in 30.1% (2,444 of 8,121) of patients who received xabans and in 31.8% (4,288 of 13,491) of patients who received VKAs (Fig. 4). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.44–1.09, p = 0.11). The heterogeneity was low (I2 = 44%), and the quality of evidence for CRNMB was also moderate.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Forest plots for the comparative analysis of the odds of recurrent venous thromboembolism in all the selected studies. Forest plots show the odds ratio (blue box) of recurrent venous thromboembolism reported in each study. The size of the blue boxes corresponds to the weight given to the study. Vertical lines represent 95% confidence interval (CI) of each odds ratio. Pooled odds ratio is shown at the bottom bolded line and is represented by a black diamond. Odds ratio over 1 favors vitamin K antagonists whereas that below 1 favors xabans. Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; VKA = vitamin K antagonist; xaban = factor Xa inhibitor

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Forest plots for the comparative analysis of the odds of major bleeding in all the selected studies. Forest plots show the odds ratio (blue box) of major bleeding reported in each study. The size of the blue boxes corresponds to the weight given to the study. Vertical lines represent 95% confidence interval (CI) of each odds ratio. Pooled odds ratio is shown at the bottom bolded line and is represented by a black diamond. Odds ratio over 1 favors vitamin K antagonists whereas that below 1 favors xabans. Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; VKA = vitamin K antagonist; xaban = factor Xa inhibitor

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Forest plots for the comparative analysis of the odds of clinically relevant non-major bleeding in selected studies. Forest plots show the odds ratio (blue box) of clinically relevant non-major bleeding reported in each study. The size of the blue boxes corresponds to the weight given to the study. Vertical lines represent 95% confidence interval of each odds ratio. Pooled odds ratio is shown at the bottom bolded line and is represented by a black diamond. Odds ratio over 1 favors vitamin K antagonists whereas that below 1 favors xabans. Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; VKA = vitamin K antagonist; xaban = factor Xa inhibitor

Full size image

Discussion

We investigated the effectiveness of xabans versus VKAs in morbidly obese patients with VTE. Our results show no statistical difference in recurrent VTE or CRNMB between xabans and VKA, and lower odds of major bleeding in the xabans group. Therefore, our findings suggest that xabans can be used to treat morbidly obese patients with VTE who were previously placed on VKAs that inconveniently required bridging, frequent blood draws for monitoring, and readmissions for sub- and supratherapeutic prothrombin time. While there have been concerns of low efficacy of xabans in obese patients due to fixed-dosage regimen, recent data has been reassuring [26,27,28]. To date, our review is the largest and most up-to-date study on the subject and support the growing evidence of safety and efficacy of xabans in treating morbidly obese patients with VTE.

Comparative analysis of the odds of recurrent VTE yielded substantial heterogeneity with Higgins and Thompson’s I2 statistic of 63%. This can be explained by several factors that include differences in the sample size and varying inclusion and exclusion criteria among the studies (Table 2). For instance, Sa et al. only included a total of 133 patients in both arms with no recurrence of VTE observed in the warfarin group, which generated an outlying odds ratio. On the other hand, Sa et al. [24], Cohen et al. [14, 20], and Costa et al. [21] excluded patients with cancers while others reported no restrictions. Xaban of choice also varied among the studies (Table 1).

Our results are consistent with those of previous studies, including sub-analyses of Einstein-DVT, Einstein-PE, and XALIA trials which found that fixed-dose rivaroxaban had a comparable efficacy and safety profile as that of heparin products or VKAs in patients with high BMI [29, 30]. In 2020, Elshafei et al. performed a meta-analysis evaluating VTE recurrence and major bleeding in 6,575 patients with BMI > 40 kg/m2 treated with either DOACs or warfarin, with results showing non-inferiority of DOACs with regards to VTE recurrence (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.93–1.23) and no difference in the odds of major bleeding (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.54–1.17) [31]. However, they could not rule out publication bias given asymmetry of the funnel plot. Moreover, analysis of VTE recurrence excluded one study that had reported VTE recurrence in rates, and their safety outcome assessing major bleeding excluded one study that had reported only a composite of major bleeding events and CRNMB.

Despite obesity being a risk factor for recurrent VTE, the overall incidence of recurrent VTE in our study was similar to that of prior studies [29, 32, 33]. Spyropoulus et al. [25] reported a much higher VTE recurrence risk of approximately 16% in their study. A likely explanation for this difference is the higher proportion of patients with malignancies and the variable duration of anticoagulation treatment and follow up. One meta-analysis of 11 NOAC trials showed that the risk of thromboembolism was higher in high body weight group compared with non-high body weight group among VTE patients (RR, 1.23; 95% CI 1.00–1.53; p = 0.05) which led to the belief that NOACs may be inappropriate in patients with higher body weight [34]. However, the control group in this study was the non-high body weight population and not high body weight patients on VKA, the conventional first-line oral anticoagulant in the morbidly obese. According to more recent reports and our findings, NOACs may be non-inferior or superior to VKAs when compared head-to-head [29,30,31]. A study of the Dresden NOAC Registry found that obese patients had lower rates of major bleeding compared with normal weight patients, which is consistent with the lower rates of major bleeding conferring superiority to xabans in the morbidly obese patients with VTE in our study [33].

In light of strong evidence from several meta-analyses and large retrospective cohort studies, xabans have emerged as a safe alternative to VKAs in morbidly obese patients. Our study consistently showed that xabans exhibited not only non-inferior efficacy but also lower odds of major bleeding when compared with VKAs to treat VTE in the morbidly obese. Despite fixed dose regimens, there is no clinical data to reflect decreased effectiveness of xabans based on the theoretical risk of reduced peak concentrations, low bioavailability, or shorter half-lives with increasing body weight. Our findings support the use of xabans in treating morbidly obese patients with VTE, consistent with the updated guidelines of ISTH which approve the use of standard-dose rivaroxaban and apixaban in patients with high BMI.

Limitations

Our study contains several limitations. We only had access to published material with no individual patient-level data available. The number of studies included in our study is also relatively small, with most of them being retrospective cohort studies. Because the number of included studies was less than 10, the assessment of publication bias lacks power and may not be accurate. There were differences in the baseline demographics and comorbidities of the cohorts, which may have impacted the recurrence of VTE. Unaccounted confounders may also be present in the studies, as in patients on xabans being more socioeconomically privileged and potentially having higher medication compliance compared to those on VKA, a cheaper, older medication. Details of baseline characteristics and specific indications of anticoagulation were unable to be captured from several studies as outcomes in the morbidly obese were displayed only as subgroup analysis. The inclusion and exclusion criteria also differed according to studies, especially with some studies excluding patients with malignancies while others not specifying such restrictions. These inter-study differences, including but not limited to patient characteristics, indications of anticoagulation, type of xaban, and inclusion/exclusion criteria, likely resulted in low to moderate heterogeneity in integrated outcomes. Further prospective cohorts or randomized clinical trials are required to generate more accurate data on the effectiveness and safety profiles of xabans in treating morbidly obese patients with VTE. Pos-hoc analysis of patient-level data, specific to the morbidly obese population, from all the relevant randomized clinical trials may also be of great benefit.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its Additional file 1. All data used in this study have been retrieved from publicly available published papers, so approval from the institutional review board was not required.

References

  1. Arepally GM, Ortel TL. Changing practice of anticoagulation: will target-specific anticoagulants replace warfarin? Annu Rev Med. 2015;66:241–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Reiffel JA, Weitz JI, Reilly P, Kaminskas E, Sarich T, Sager P, et al. NOAC monitoring, reversal agents, and post-approval safety and effectiveness evaluation: a cardiac safety research consortium think tank. Am Heart J. 2016;177:74–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC Jr, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2014;130(23):2071–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kearon C, Akl EA, Ornelas J, Blaivas A, Jimenez D, Bounameaux H, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest. 2016;149(2):315–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Adult Obesity Facts. June 7, 2021 [cited 2021 August 19]. https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/adult.html

  6. Ward ZJ, Bleich SN, Cradock AL, Barrett JL, Giles CM, Flax C, et al. Projected U.S. state-level prevalence of adult obesity and severe obesity. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(25):2440–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Martin K, Beyer-Westendorf J, Davidson BL, Huisman MV, Sandset PM, Moll S. Use of the direct oral anticoagulants in obese patients: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost. 2016;14(6):1308–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Martin KA, Beyer-Westendorf J, Davidson BL, Huisman MV, Sandset PM, Moll S. Use of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with obesity for treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism: updated communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Control of Anticoagulation. J Thromb Haemost. 2021;19(8):1874–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hinojar R, Jiménez-Natcher JJ, Fernández-Golfín C, Zamorano JL. New oral anticoagulants: a practical guide for physicians. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2015;1(2):134–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Barnes GD, Lucas E, Alexander GC, Goldberger ZD. National trends in ambulatory oral anticoagulant use. Am J Med. 2015;128(12):1300-5.e2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. López-López JA, Sterne JAC, Thom HHZ, Higgins JPT, Hingorani AD, Okoli GN, et al. Oral anticoagulants for prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation: systematic review, network meta-analysis, and cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ. 2017;359: j5058.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Palareti G, Poli D. The challenges and limitations of widespread direct oral anticoagulant treatment: practical suggestions for their best use. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2016;14(2):163–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372: n71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Cohen AT, Pan S, Byon W, Ilyas BS, Taylor T, Lee TC. Efficacy, safety, and exposure of apixaban in patients with high body weight or obesity and venous thromboembolism: insights from AMPLIFY. Adv Ther. 2021;38(6):3003–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Perales IJ, San Agustin K, DeAngelo J, Campbell AM. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin for stroke prevention and venous thromboembolism treatment in extreme obesity and high body weight. Ann Pharmacother. 2020;54(4):344–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Piran S, Traquair H, Chan N, Bhagirath V, Schulman S. Peak plasma concentration of direct oral anticoagulants in obese patients weighing over 120 kilograms: a retrospective study. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2018;2(4):684–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaatz S, Ahmad D, Spyropoulos AC, Schulman S. Definition of clinically relevant non-major bleeding in studies of anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolic disease in non-surgical patients: communication from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost. 2015;13(11):2119–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wells GA, Wells G, Shea B, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. 2014; 2014.

  19. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Woodcock J, Brozek J, Helfand M, et al. GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1303–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cohen A, Sah J, Lee T, Rosenblatt L, Hlavacek P, Emir B, et al. Effectiveness and safety of apixaban vs. warfarin in venous thromboembolism patients with obesity and morbid obesity. J Clin Med. 2021;10(2):200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Costa OS, Beyer-Westendorf J, Ashton V, Milentijevic D, Moore KT, Bunz TJ, et al. Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in obese patients with acute venous thromboembolism: analysis of electronic health record data. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2021;51(2):349–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Crouch A, Ng TH, Kelley D, Knight T, Edwin S, Ascend H, et al. Multi-center retrospective study evaluating the efficacy and safety of apixaban versus warfarin for treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with severe obesity. Pharmacotherapy. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.2655.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kushnir M, Choi Y, Eisenberg R, Rao D, Tolu S, Gao J, et al. Efficacy and safety of direct oral factor Xa inhibitors compared with warfarin in patients with morbid obesity: a single-centre, retrospective analysis of chart data. Lancet Haematol. 2019;6(7):e359–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sa RA, Al-Ani F, Lazo-Langner A, Louzada ML. Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in obese patients with venous thromboembolism. Blood. 2019;134(Supplement_1):3675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Spyropoulos AC, Ashton V, Chen YW, Wu B, Peterson ED. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin treatment among morbidly obese patients with venous thromboembolism: comparative effectiveness, safety, and costs. Thromb Res. 2019;182:159–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bauersachs R, Berkowitz SD, Brenner B, Buller HR, Decousus H, Gallus AS, et al. Oral rivaroxaban for symptomatic venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(26):2499–510.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Büller HR, Décousus H, Grosso MA, Mercuri M, Middeldorp S, Prins MH, et al. Edoxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(15):1406–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Büller HR, Prins MH, Lensin AW, Decousus H, Jacobson BF, Minar E, et al. Oral rivaroxaban for the treatment of symptomatic pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(14):1287–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ageno W, Mantovani LG, Haas S, Kreutz R, Monje D, Schneider J, et al. Safety and effectiveness of oral rivaroxaban versus standard anticoagulation for the treatment of symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis (XALIA): an international, prospective, non-interventional study. Lancet Haematol. 2016;3(1):e12-21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Di Nisio M, Vedovati MC, Riera-Mestre A, Prins MH, Mueller K, Cohen AT, et al. Treatment of venous thromboembolism with rivaroxaban in relation to body weight. A sub-analysis of the EINSTEIN DVT/PE studies. Thromb Haemost. 2016;116(4):739–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Elshafei MN, Mohamed MFH, El-Bardissy A, Ahmed MB, Abdallah I, Elewa H, et al. Comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin in morbidly obese patients with acute venous thromboembolism: systematic review and a meta-analysis. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2021;51(2):388–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Eichinger S, Hron G, Bialonczyk C, Hirschl M, Minar E, Wagner O, et al. Overweight, obesity, and the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(15):1678–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tittl L, Endig S, Marten S, Reitter A, Beyer-Westendorf I, Beyer-Westendorf J. Impact of BMI on clinical outcomes of NOAC therapy in daily care—results of the prospective Dresden NOAC Registry (NCT01588119). Int J Cardiol. 2018;262:85–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Boonyawat K, Caron F, Li A, Chai-Adisaksopha C, Lim W, Iorio A, et al. Association of body weight with efficacy and safety outcomes in phase III randomized controlled trials of direct oral anticoagulants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost. 2017;15(7):1322–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

No funding was received in conducting this study.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Dae Yong Park and Seokyung An have contributed equally to this study.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, John H. Stroger Jr Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL, USA

    Dae Yong Park, Abdul Wahab Arif & Muhammad Khawar Sana

  2. Department of Biomedical Science, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, Korea

    Seokyung An

  3. Division of Cardiology, Cook County Health, Chicago, IL, USA

    Aviral Vij

  4. Division of Cardiology, Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL, USA

    Aviral Vij

Authors
  1. Dae Yong Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Seokyung An
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abdul Wahab Arif
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Muhammad Khawar Sana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Aviral Vij
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

DYP: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, resources, software, visualization, writing original draft, review and editing. SA: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, resources, software, visualization, writing original draft, review and editing. AWA: writing original draft, review and editing. MKS: validation, review and editing. AV: project administration, resources, supervision, validation, review and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aviral Vij.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was exempt from ethics approval as only data from previously published studies were retrieved and synthesized.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

All supplementary tables and figures.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, D.Y., An, S., Arif, A.W. et al. Factor Xa inhibitors versus vitamin K antagonist in morbidly obese patients with venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 23, 100 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03067-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03067-4

Keywords

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2261

Contact us