Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of C-statistics for Discriminating CHD and CVD Risks Between Models with and Without CAC Density

From: Coronary calcium density in relation to coronary heart disease and cardiovascular disease in adults with diabetes or metabolic syndrome: the Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)

 

DM

(n = 668)

MetS

(n = 1122)

Neither DM/MetS

(n = 2028)

Total

(n = 3818)

CHD

Model 1

0.60†

0.64§

0.63‡

0.63§

Model 2

0.67

0.70†

0.70

0.69*

Model 3

0.67

0.70*

0.70

0.70

Model 4

0.67

0.72

0.70

0.70

CVD

Model 1

0.59‡

0.65†

0.66§

0.66§

Model 2

0.66

0.69

0.70

0.69*

Model 3

0.66

0.69

0.70

0.69

Model 4

0.67

0.70

0.71

0.70

  1. Model 1 (Base model): 10-year ASCVD risk score + race/ethnicity + education + BMI + statin therapy
  2. Model 2: Base model + ln(Agatston)
  3. Model 3: Base model + ln(Volume)
  4. Model 4: Base model + ln(Volume) + CAC Density
  5. Harrell’s c-statistics were compared between model 4 versus model 1, 2 or 3
  6. ASCVD  Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, BMI   Body mass index, CAC  Coronary artery calcium, CHD   Coronary heart disease, CVD  Cardiovascular disease, DM  Diabetes mellitus, MetS , Metabolic syndrome
  7. *p < 0.05, †p < 0.01, ‡p < 0.001, § p < 0.0001