Skip to main content
Download PDF

Serum angiopoietin-1 concentration does not distinguish patients with ischaemic stroke from those presenting to hospital with ischaemic stroke mimics

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders volume 22, Article number: 462 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

A previous study found that circulating angiopoietin-1 (angpt-1) concentrations were significantly lower in patients who had a recent ischaemic stroke compared to healthy controls. The primary aim of this study was to assess whether serum angpt-1 could be used as a diagnostic test of ischemic stroke in patients presenting to hospital as an emergency. Exploratory analyses investigated the association of proteins functionally related to angpt-1 (angpt-2, Tie-2, matrix metalloproteinase-9 and vascular endothelial growth factors A, C and D) with ischaemic stroke diagnosis.

Methods

Patients presenting to Townsville University Hospital for emergency assessment of stroke-like symptoms were consecutively recruited and provided a blood sample. After assessment by a consultant neurologist, patients were grouped into those who did, or did not have ischaemic stroke. The potential for serum angpt-1 to diagnose ischaemic stroke was assessed using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. Cross-sectional analyses appraised inter-group differences in the serum concentration of other proteins.

Results

One-hundred and twenty-six patients presenting to Townsville University Hospital for emergency assessment of stroke-like symptoms were recruited (median time from symptom onset to hospital presentation: 2.6 (inter-quartile range: 1.2–4.6) hours). Serum angpt-1 had poor ability to diagnose ischaemic stroke in analyses using the whole cohort, or in sensitivity analyses (area under the ROC curve 0.51 (95% CI: 0.41–0.62) and 0.52 (95% CI: 0.39–0.64), respectively). No associations of serum angpt-1 concentration with ischaemic stroke severity, symptom duration or aetiology were observed. Serum concentrations of the other assessed proteins did not differ between patient groups.

Conclusions

Serum angpt-1 concentration is unlikely to be useful for emergency diagnosis of ischaemic stroke.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Global Burden of Disease data reveals that approximately 12 million incident stroke events occurred in 2019, ~ 60% of which were ischaemic [1]. Chemical thrombolysis using recombinant tissue plasminogen activator is used to treat ischaemic stroke but has a limited window of efficacy and is associated with a significant risk of bleeding complications [2,3,4]. Current guidelines recommend that ischaemic stroke diagnosis be confirmed through brain imaging and specialist assessment prior to instigating treatment [5] however this introduces geographical inequities in access to care [3, 6], and risk of misdiagnosis [7, 8], within a time critical window for intervention. In contrast acute myocardial infarction can be rapidly diagnosed and treated using objective serological data to guide clinical decision making [9, 10]. The discovery of similarly effective blood markers to diagnose ischaemic stroke has potential to streamline current management processes and improve patient outcome [8, 11, 12].

Animal studies suggest that the expression of the protein angiopoietin-1 (angpt-1) alters following an ischemic stroke, and that upregulating angpt-1 reduces the severity of cerebral infarction [4, 13]. A case–control study (336 cases and 321 healthy controls) also reported that median plasma angpt-1 concentration was threefold lower in patients who had a recent ischemic stroke than controls, indicating strong diagnostic potential (area under receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.95 (95% CI 0.93, 0.96)) [14]. To be clinically useful, an effective diagnostic blood test would need to differentiate between ischaemic stroke and other conditions presenting with similar symptoms. It is therefore vital to examine the ability for blood angpt-1 concentration to distinguish patients experiencing ischaemic stroke from those with other acute health problems mimicking stroke. The primary aim of this study was to assess whether serum angpt-1 concentrations could be valuable as a diagnostic test of ischemic stroke in consecutively recruited patients presenting as an emergency to hospital with a possible diagnosis of stroke. Exploratory analyses assessed the difference in serum concentrations of proteins functionally related to angpt-1 between patients with or without ischaemic stroke to identify whether they had additional biomarker potential.

Materials and methods

Patients

The current study consecutively recruited participants presenting to the Townsville University Hospital, Queensland, Australia, for investigation of stroke-like symptoms from 2017–2020. This study was conducted with approval from the Human Research Ethics Committees at James Cook University and the Townsville University Hospital, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. For inclusion, patients had to be aged > 18 years and present to hospital within 24 h of symptom onset. Written informed consent was collected from all patients, or via a responsible 3rd party if the patient was unable to provide consent in person. Patients consented via a third party were contacted and re-enrolled if they later regained the ability to consent in person. The study is reported in line with the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic accuracy studies (STARD) recommendations (2015) [15].

Outcome assessment

All diagnosis were made by a consultant neurologist (RW) blinded to the biomarker results. The primary outcome was ischaemic stroke diagnosis, based upon a clear clinical presentation and congruent brain imaging evidence of cerebral infarction (either computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging conducted as part of standard care), in line with current guidelines [5]. Estimations of ischaemic stroke severity at presentation reported by attending neurologists during standard care were extracted from patient charts. Heterogeneity in the choice of stroke severity assessment tool was observed. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Severity Score (NIHSS) was the most consistently applied tool (used in approximately three quarters of recruited participants) and was therefore employed in the current study. Numbers of patients for whom this detail is missing are reported (Fig. 1). Ischaemic stroke aetiology was categorised according to the Trial of ORG 10,172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) criteria [16] based on imaging and clinical findings for all recruited participants. Primary haemorrhagic stroke was diagnosed based on the presence of a hyper-dense area on cerebral CT [5]. Transient ischaemic attack was diagnosed based on stroke-like symptoms which resolved within 24 h of onset and no evidence of cerebral infarction on radiological imaging [5]. Stroke mimics were defined as a non-vascular condition presenting with acute or subacute stroke-like neurological deficits without brain infarction.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Patient flow for the current study; a Based on 44 observations (73.3% of group); b Based on 55 observations (91.7% of group); c Based on 57 observations (86.4% of group); d Based on 7 observations (77.8% of group); e Based on 25 observations (96.2% of group); f Based on 25 observations (80.6% of group). ESUS: Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source

Full size image

Clinical risk factors and medications

Characteristics collected for each participant included sex, age, history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus coronary heart disease (CHD) and prescribed medications as previously described [17, 18]. Hypertension and diabetes were defined by a history of diagnosis or treatment for these conditions. CHD status was defined by a history of angina, myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization. Details of medications prescribed at the time of presentation were recorded.

Blood samples & analysis

Peripheral blood samples were collected from all participants at recruitment as part of standard care and serum was processed by the Townsville University Hospital Pathology Department (Pathology Queensland) prior to storing at − 80 °C for later analysis. Serum angpt-1, matrix-metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) and Tie-2 concentrations were measured using commercially available ELISAs according to manufacturer’s directions (DANG 10, DMP900 and DTE200, respectively, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, USA). Serum angiopoietin-2 (angpt-2), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A, -C and -D concentrations were measured using the MilliPLEX MAP Human Angiogenesis/Growth Factor Magnetic Bead Panel—Cancer Multiplex Assay kit (HAGP1MAG-12 K, Merck, Australia), using the MagPIX platform, and analyses were conducted by a researcher blinded to patient diagnosis. Samples in which the assessed biomarker fell outside of the detectable limits of the test were excluded from analysis (detailed in Supplement 1). Biomarker analysis was conducted independently of patient care and had no potential to influence clinical outcome.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were non-normally distributed (Shapiro–Wilk test) and are presented as median and inter-quartile range. Some variables (e.g. NIHSS score and time from symptom onset to hospital presentation) were not available for all patients and were not imputed owing to their non-random distribution within the population. Inter-group comparisons were performed using the Mann–Whitney U test, or Kruskall-Wallis test. Nominal data are presented as count and percent and were compared between groups using the Chi-squared test. Correlations between continuous variables (including serum protein concentrations) were tested using Spearman’s correlation. For all analyses a p value of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The ability of serum angpt-1 concentration to diagnose ischaemic stroke was assessed using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves (boot-strapped for 2000 iterations). Area under the ROC curve and 95% confidence intervals are reported. The initial analysis included all recruited participants, leading to a sensitivity analysis comparing patients with ischaemic stroke those with stroke mimics.

All analyses were performed using RStudio (Version 3.5.5) using the “car”, “dplyr”, “knitr”, “ggplot2″, “pROC”, “ggpubr”, “magrittr”, “tibble”, “ggsignif”,”ggsci” and”rlang” packages.

Sample size calculation

The study was powered to assess the ability of serum angpt-1 concentration to diagnose ischaemic stroke as a primary outcome. Our previous case–control study reported that circulating angpt-1 had high potential to distinguish patients with acute ischaemic stroke from healthy controls evidenced by an area under the ROC curve of 0.946 (95% CI: 0.923–0.963) [14]. The current study utilized consecutively recruited participants suspected of suffering ischaemic stroke, and it was hypothesized that mechanisms underpinning neurological symptoms in the non-stroke patients may influence circulating angpt-1 concentrations. Accordingly, the current study was powered to test the ability of serum angpt-1 concentration to diagnose stroke with a conservative area under the ROC curve of at least 0.800, corresponding to ‘good’ clinical performance [19]. Assuming a 1:1 ischaemic:non-ischaemic stroke ratio and a 2-tailed alpha of 0.05, power calculations suggested that a minimum of 17 participants per group were needed to detect this with 90% power.

Results

Patient characteristics

A total of 126 participants were included in this study, 60 of whom were diagnosed with ischaemic strokes (Table 1, Fig. 1). Ischaemic strokes within the cohort predominantly arose due to cardioembolism or small vessel occlusion, accounting for 31.7% and 30.0% of ischaemic stroke presentations, respectively (Fig. 1). Median (inter-quartile range) NIHSS score was 3 (1–5) in 44 individuals in whom this was assessed. None of the ischaemic stroke patients had received thrombolysis prior to blood collection. Sixty-six patients who did not receive an ischaemic stroke diagnosis were also included in this study. Of these, 9 patients were diagnosed with primary haemorrhagic stroke, 26 were diagnosed with transient ischaemic attacks, and 31 were diagnosed with ischaemic stroke mimics (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table 2). The majority of participants in the stroke mimic group were diagnosed with functional neurological disorders, migraines and/or syncope or peripheral vertigo (collectively accounting for 71% of presentations; Fig. 1).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients included in this study
Full size table

Patients diagnosed with ischaemic stroke were significantly more likely to have had a prior stroke than those who received a non-ischaemic stroke diagnosis. No other differences in cardiovascular risk factors or prescribed medications were observed between the groups. Median time from symptom onset to hospital presentation for the cohort was 2.6 (inter-quartile range: 1.2–4.6) hours and did not differ between the groups.

Primary outcome assessment: the association of serum angpt-1 with ischaemic stroke diagnosis

Serum angpt-1 was detected in 119 (94.4%) of the 126 participants recruited to the study (n = 56 and 63 for participants who did or did not suffer ischaemic stroke, respectively; Supplement 1). ROC analysis revealed that serum angpt-1 concentration had poor ability to detect patients with ischaemic stroke in comparisons utilising the whole cohort, or in sub-analysis including patients with ischaemic stroke or stroke mimics (data from 56 participants with, and 30 without ischaemic stroke Fig. 2A and Supplement 1). Cross-sectional comparisons demonstrated no difference in serum angpt-1 concentrations between groups of patients who did or did not have ischaemic stroke (Fig. 2B and C), or between those suffering ischaemic strokes of different aetiology as determined by TOAST classification (Fig. 2D). No relationship between serum angpt-1 concentration and time from symptom onset to hospital presentation (Fig. 2E), or stroke severity as assessed by the NIHSS scale (Fig. 2F) was observed.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The association of serum angpt-1 with ischaemic stroke diagnosis. A ROC curve assessing the potential for serum angpt-1 to identify patients with ischaemic stroke when compared to the whole cohort (red line), or stroke mimics (black line). Serum concentrations of angpt-1 for patients according to stroke presence (B), specific presentation (C) or stroke sub-type according to TOAST criteria (D). Spearman correlations of serum angpt-1 concentration and time from symptom onset to presentation (E); and stroke severity as assessed by NIHSS score (F). ESUS: Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source

Full size image

Exploratory analyses: the association of serum concentrations of angiogenic proteins with ischaemic stroke

Correlation analyses demonstrated significant positive associations between several of the assessed proteins (Supplement 3). Cross-sectional analyses revealed no difference in serum angpt-2, Tie-2, MMP-9 or VEGF-A, -C and –D concentrations between groups of participants who did or did not have an ischaemic stroke (Fig. 3). None of the assessed serum proteins showed significant correlations with the time between symptom onset and presentation to hospital (Supplement 4). A statistically significant correlation of serum VEGF-A concentration, with NIHSS score was observed (Spearman’s rho: 0.367; p = 0.014; Supplement 4). Serum concentrations of the other assessed proteins were not significantly correlated with stroke severity. Cross sectional comparisons suggested significant differences in the serum concentrations of VEGF-D between presenting groups (i.e. ischaemic stroke, TIA, haemorrhagic stroke and stroke mimics), and serum angpt-2 across TOAST categories (Supplements 5 and 6). A trend suggesting potential differences in serum VEGF-D concentration across TOAST categories was observed but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.055, Supplement 6). Serum concentrations of the other assessed proteins did not differ according to presentation or ischaemic stroke aetiology (Supplement 6).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Comparisons of serum angiopoietin-2 (A), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (B), Tie-2 (C), VEGF-A (D), VEGF-C (E) and VEGF-D (F) between groups of patients who did and did not have ischaemic stroke

Full size image

Discussion

Findings of the current study suggest that serum angpt-1 concentrations did not differ between groups of patients who did and did not have an ischaemic stroke and has poor diagnostic potential. This contrasts with findings of our previous study which reported high potential for plasma angpt-1 concentration to diagnose ischaemic stroke [14]. This difference in findings is likely reflective of the very different design of the two studies. The previous study adopted a case–control design to compare groups of patients who had an ischaemic stroke with healthy controls, whereas the current investigation consecutively recruited participants presenting for emergency assessment of stroke-like symptoms. Approximately 40% of the non-stroke patients (~ 20% of whole cohort) were diagnosed with transient ischaemic attack which may also be associated with changes in blood biomarkers. Also previous investigations have reported significant differences in the circulating concentrations of some of the investigated proteins between groups of healthy controls and individuals with health problems mimicking stroke (e.g [20]). It is also important to note that protein analysis in the current study was conducted on serum samples, compared to plasma samples in the previous report [14]. This was necessary as platelet-free plasma required by available assays could not be obtained from the current cohort. Nonetheless, previous studies have reported significant differences in serum angpt-1 concentrations between comparator groups demonstrating that serum is a suitable medium for investigating angpt-1 expression [21,22,23].

The other proteins assessed in the current study were selected due to their known involvement in angiogenesis which is tightly regulated under normal physiological circumstances, but is activated in response to ischaemic injury (Fig. 4 and references [24,25,26,27,28] for detailed reviews). In brief, hypoxia inducible transcription factor activation following ischaemic stroke rapidly induces the production and secretion of pro-angiogenic chemokines including VEGF from neurons, astrocytes and microglia within the ischaemic tissue [28, 29]. VEGF stimulates the differentiation of a vascular endothelial cell into a tip cell (Fig. 4A) which guides the migration of a vascular stalk towards areas of high VEGF concentration (Fig. 1B), facilitated by the release of basement-membrane degrading proteases such as MMP-9 [29]. Nascent blood vessels produced in response to VEGF are immature and highly permeable. The angpt-Tie-2 axis is the master regulator of vascular integrity [24] and available evidence suggests that processes mediated through this pathway are important in post stroke recovery. Angpt-1 is an obligate ligand for the Tie-2 receptor which is abundantly expressed throughout the vascular endothelium. Angpt-1 forms tetramers which bind to the Tie-2 receptor and exerts stabilising effects on the developing blood vessel through several mechanisms. Firstly, angpt-1/Tie-2 signalling exerts anti-inflammatory effects, and promotes endothelial cell survival, migration and proliferation (Fig. 4C and [28] for detailed review). Angpt-1/Tie-2 receptor signalling also improves the contact between adjacent endothelial cells, surrounding vascular smooth muscle cells and the basement membrane [4]. Translocation of the Tie-2 receptor to the endothelial cell boundaries also enables neighbouring cells to bind the same angpt-1 tetramer in trans, which contributes to the formation of tight junctions (Fig. 4C) [4, 28]. Angpt-1/Tie-2 signalling has also been suggested to confer neuro-protective effects [28, 30,31,32]. Observations of significantly smaller cerebral infarctions, and reduced blood–brain-barrier permeability in rodents receiving interventions to increase endogenous angpt-1 [4, 32], and better functional outcomes for patients with higher circulating angpt-1 concentrations at presentation [14], suggest that angpt-1 mediated processes are beneficial in post-stroke recovery. Angpt-2 is secreted from vascular endothelial cells in response to focal inflammation and hypoxia and competes with angpt-1 for the Tie-2 receptor [24, 27] to inhibit, or weakly stimulate Tie-2 signalling in a context-dependent manner. Elucidating of the role of angpt-2 in ischaemic stroke recovery is therefore complicated, and previous studies utilising rodent models have provided contradictory evidence of the effect of angpt-2 over expression on vascular permeability [28].

Fig. 4
figure 4

Overview of angiogenesis and rationale for biomarker selection in the current study. A Ischaemic insult results in the secretion of VEGF from hypoxic cells (shown in dark red). VEGF signaling stimulates the transformation of a resting vascular endothelial cell into a tip cell. B The tip cell guides the migration of a vascular stalk towards the area of high VEGF concentration, facilitated by the secretion of basement-degrading enzymes such as MMP-9. C Ligation of endothelial cell-expressed Tie-2 by angpt-1 exerts anti-apoptotic, anti-inflammatory and pro-migratory effects, and promotes tight junction formation between neighbouring cells to reduce vascular permeability. D Angpt-2 competes for the Tie-2 receptor to antagonise angpt-1 mediated processes

Full size image

Whilst much work has been performed to understand the role of the assessed proteins in the response to ischaemia, comparatively few studies have investigated the association of these proteins with ischaemic stroke diagnosis. Meta-analyses of independent genomic studies support an association of polymorphisms of the VEGF [33] and MMP-9 [34,35,36,37,38] genes with increased risk of stroke. In contrast, a recent meta-analysis of case–control studies suggests no difference in total serum VEGF concentrations between groups of patients diagnosed with a stroke and healthy controls [39]. Data from the current study identified a significant difference in serum VEGF-D concentration when comparing between specific participant presenting groups (i.e. ischaemic stroke, TIA, haemorrhagic stroke or stroke mimics), however this was not upheld in primary comparisons which grouped patients based on a positive or negative ischaemic stroke diagnosis. It is therefore possible that individual VEGF isoforms may be more closely associated with specific presentations than total VEGF, and that this association may have been lost in the current study upon grouping patients according to ischaemic stroke presence or absence. Further appropriately powered studies are needed to directly assess this. Associations of blood-borne MMP-9 concentration with poor stroke outcomes have been reported across independent studies, and high circulating MMP-9 concentrations have been associated with increased risk of haemorrhagic transformation following ischaemic stroke [40, 41]; however, the association of MMP-9 with incident stroke has been less widely explored [12]. Two small studies have independently reported that circulating angpt-2 concentrations are significantly higher in patients who have experienced an ischaemic stroke, than healthy controls [42, 43], although this is contradicted by findings of the current study.

Findings of this study must be considered in line with its strengths and weaknesses. A major strength of this study was the recruitment of a clinically relevant patient population. Also, the median time from symptom onset to hospital presentation for this cohort (2.6 h) was within the 4.5 h therapeutic window for thrombolysis. Thus, the current study reflects the clinical challenge whereby an effective diagnostic must be able to discriminate patients with ischaemic stroke from a high background of non-related conditions, immediately after the event. Evidence suggests that expression of the assessed proteins increases in the peri-infarct region within hours to days of an ischaemic stroke [28]. It is therefore possible that inter-group differences in the serum protein concentrations may have been observed if patients were followed and repeatedly sampled, however, this is not suggestive of strong diagnostic potential and does not reflect clinical need. It is also important to consider that clinical notes did not include NIHSS score for all participants, and brain imaging data to estimate cerebral infarction volume was not available, thereby complicating in-depth investigation of the relationship between serum biomarker concentration and ischaemic stroke severity. Available data, however, suggest no correlation between serum angpt-1 concentration and NIHSS score. Ischaemic stroke aetiology in the current cohort was heterogeneous and we were under-powered to directly assess the relationship of circulating biomarkers with specific TOAST sub-classes, however, sample size calculations based on previous findings suggest that the study was well powered to assess the primary outcome [14]. Information on the duration of symptoms for patients diagnosed with transient ischaemic attack was also not available, meaning that potentially heterogeneous patients were grouped together. Finally, it is important to note that the study recruited participants from a single centre and further investigation in larger, independent cohorts including patients with strokes of varying severity and aetiology are therefore warranted to determine the generalisability of study findings.

In conclusion, the current study utilised serum samples collected from a clinically relevant patient cohort to demonstrate that angpt-1 has poor potential to diagnose acute ischaemic stroke. No association between ischaemic stroke diagnosis and serum concentrations of the other assessed proteins was observed.

Availability of data and materials

The Queensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease (QRCPVD) will oversee any materials sharing processes. Requests for data should be addressed to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20:795–820

  2. Wardlaw JM, Murray V, Berge E, del Zoppo GJ. Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014:Cd000213.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, et al. 2018 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018;49:e46–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Moxon JV, Trollope AF, Dewdney B, de Hollander C, Nastasi DR, Maguire JM, et al. The effect of angiopoietin-1 upregulation on the outcome of acute ischaemic stroke in rodent models: A meta-analysis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2019;39:2343–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Stroke Foundation. Clinical guidelines for stroke management. https://informme.org.au/en/Guidelines/Clinical-Guidelines-for-Stroke-Management. Accessed May 2021

  6. Sharobeam A, Jones B, Walton-Sonda D, Lueck CJ. Factors delaying intravenous thrombolytic therapy in acute ischaemic stroke: A systematic review of the literature. J Neurol. 2021;268:2723–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Campbell BCV, Donnan GA, Mitchell PJ, Davis SM. Endovascular thrombectomy for stroke: Current best practice and future goals. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2016;1:16–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Dias A, Silva I, Pinto IM, Maia LF. Timely and blood-based multiplex molecular profiling of acute stroke. Life. 2021;11(8):816.

  9. Chew DP, Scott IA, Cullen L, French JK, Briffa TG, Tideman PA, et al. National heart foundation of Australia & cardiac society of Australia and New Zealand: Australian clinical guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes 2016. Heart Lung Circ. 2016;25:895–951.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chaulin A. Clinical and diagnostic value of highly sensitive cardiac troponins in arterial hypertension. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2021;17:431–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Dewdney B, Trollope A, Moxon J, Thomas Manapurathe D, Biros E, Golledge J. Circulating micrornas as biomarkers for acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;27:522–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Baez SC, García Del Barco D, Hardy-Sosa A, Guillen Nieto G, Bringas-Vega ML, Llibre-Guerra JJ, et al. Scalable bio marker combinations for early stroke diagnosis: A systematic review. Frontiers Neurol. 2021;12:638693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sun J, Yu L, Huang S, Lai X, Milner R, Li L. Vascular expression of angiopoietin1, α5β1 integrin and tight junction proteins is tightly regulated during vascular remodeling in the post-ischemic brain. Neuroscience. 2017;362:248–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Golledge J, Clancy P, Maguire J, Lincz L, Koblar S, McEvoy M, et al. Plasma angiopoietin-1 is lower after ischemic stroke and associated with major disability but not stroke incidence. Stroke. 2014;45:1064–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig L, et al. Stard 2015: An updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ. 2015;351: h5527.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Adams HP Jr, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, et al. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. Toast. Trial of org 10172 in acute stroke treatment. Stroke. 1993;24:35–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Moxon JV, Jones RE, Wong G, Weir JM, Mellett NA, Kingwell BA, et al. Baseline serum phosphatidylcholine plasmalogen concentrations are inversely associated with incident myocardial infarction in patients with mixed peripheral artery disease presentations. Atherosclerosis. 2017;263:301–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Moxon JV, Liu D, Wong G, Weir JM, Behl-Gilhotra R, Bradshaw B, et al. Comparison of the serum lipidome in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm and peripheral artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2014;7:71–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Xia J, Broadhurst DI, Wilson M, Wishart DS. Translational biomarker discovery in clinical metabolomics: An introductory tutorial. Metabolomics. 2013;9:280–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Michalak S, Kalinowska-Lyszczarz A, Wegrzyn D, Thielemann A, Osztynowicz K, Kozubski W. The levels of circulating proangiogenic factors in migraineurs. Neuromolecular Med. 2017;19:510–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Xie H, Wang H, Wu Q, Peng J, Huang H, Wang Y, et al. Endothelin-1/endothelin receptor type a-angiopoietins/tie-2 pathway in regulating the cross talk between glomerular endothelial cells and podocytes in trichloroethylene-induced renal immune injury. J Inflamm Res. 2021;14:761–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kinnen A, Klaschik S, Neumann C, Egger EK, Mustea A, Soehle M, et al. Gene expression in the angiopoietin/tie axis is altered in peripheral tissue of ovarian cancer patients: A prospective observational study. Life Sci. 2021;274:119345.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Enomoto N, Suzuki S, Hozumi H, Karayama M, Suzuki Y, Furuhashi K, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of serum angiopoietin-1 and -2 concentrations in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Sci Rep. 2021;11:15502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Moss A. The angiopoietin: Tie 2 interaction: A potential target for future therapies in human vascular disease. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2013;24:579–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Saharinen P, Eklund L, Alitalo K. Therapeutic targeting of the angiopoietin-tie pathway. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16:635–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Eklund L, Saharinen P. Angiopoietin signaling in the vasculature. Exp Cell Res. 2013;319:1271–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Eklund L, Kangas J, Saharinen P. Angiopoietin-tie signalling in the cardiovascular and lymphatic systems. Clin Sci. 2017;131:87–103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kunze R, Marti HH. Angioneurins - key regulators of blood-brain barrier integrity during hypoxic and ischemic brain injury. Prog Neurobiol. 2019;178:101611.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rodriguez D, Watts D, Gaete D, Sormendi S, Wielockx B. Hypoxia pathway proteins and their impact on the blood vasculature. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(17):9191.

  30. Meng Z, Li M, He Q, Jiang S, Zhang X, Xiao J, et al. Ectopic expression of human angiopoietin-1 promotes functional recovery and neurogenesis after focal cerebral ischemia. Neuroscience. 2014;267:135–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Shin HY, Lee YJ, Kim HJ, Park CK, Kim JH, Wang KC, et al. Protective role of comp-ang1 in ischemic rat brain. J Neurosci Res. 2010;88:1052–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Venkat P, Ning R, Zacharek A, Culmone L, Liang L, Landschoot-Ward J, et al. Treatment with an angiopoietin-1 mimetic peptide promotes neurological recovery after stroke in diabetic rats. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2021;27:48–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Xu B, Zhan R, Mai H, Wu Z, Zhu P, Liang Y, et al. The association between vascular endothelial growth factor gene polymorphisms and stroke: A prisma-compliant meta-analysis. Medicine. 2019;98:e14696.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. He T, Wang J, Wang XL, Deng WS, Sun P. Association between the matrix metalloproteinase-9 rs3918242 polymorphism and ischemic stroke susceptibility: A meta-analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;26:1136–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Misra S, Talwar P, Kumar A, Kumar P, Sagar R, Vibha D, et al. Association between matrix metalloproteinase family gene polymorphisms and risk of ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 29 studies. Gene. 2018;672:180–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang B, Wang Y, Zhao L. Mmp-9 gene rs3918242 polymorphism increases risk of stroke: A meta-analysis. J Cell Biochem. 2018;119:9801–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wu G, Cai H, Li G, Meng S, Huang J, Xu H, et al. Influence of the matrix metalloproteinase 9 geners3918242 polymorphism on development of ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2020;133:e31–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Jiang Y, Liu H, Wang Y, Shi X, Shao Y, Xu Z. Meta-analysis of matrix metalloproteinase (mmp)-9 c1562t polymorphism and susceptibility to ischemic stroke in the chinese population. J Int Med Res. 2020;48:300060520926427.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Seidkhani-Nahal A, Khosravi A, Mirzaei A, Basati G, Abbasi M, Noori-Zadeh A. Serum vascular endothelial growth factor (vegf) levels in ischemic stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies. Neurological. 2021;42:1811–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Krishnamoorthy S, Singh G, Jose KJ, Soman B, Foerch C, Kimberly WT, et al. Biomarkers in the prediction of hemorrhagic transformation in acute stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022;51(2):253–47.

  41. Wang L, Wei C, Deng L, Wang Z, Song M, Xiong Y, et al. The accuracy of serum matrix metalloproteinase-9 for predicting hemorrhagic transformation after acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;27:1653–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Alrafiah A, Alofi E, Almohaya Y, Hamami A, Qadah T, Almaghrabi S, et al. Angiogenesis biomarkers in ischemic stroke patients. J Inflamm Res. 2021;14:4893–900.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Gurnik S, Devraj K, Macas J, Yamaji M, Starke J, Scholz A, et al. Angiopoietin-2-induced blood-brain barrier compromise and increased stroke size are rescued by ve-ptp-dependent restoration of tie2 signaling. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131:753–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Jonathan Golledge holds a Practitioner Fellowship from the National Health and Medical Research Council (1117061) and a Senior Clinical Research Fellowship from the Queensland Government.

Funding

This work was supported by an Advance Queensland Mid-Career Fellowship held by Joseph Moxon and a donation from the Donald and Joan Wilson Foundation, Australia. The funders played no role in study design, or collection, analysis, interpretation and reporting of data.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Joseph V. Moxon and Ann-Katrin Kraeuter contributed equally to the work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Queensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease, College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia

    Joseph V. Moxon, Ann-Katrin Kraeuter, James Phie, Georgina Anderson, Glenys Standley, Cindy Sealey & Jonathan Golledge

  2. Centre for Molecular Therapeutics, Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia

    Joseph V. Moxon, Ann-Katrin Kraeuter & James Phie

  3. Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, , Northumbria University, PsychologyNewcastle Upon Tyne, UK

    Ann-Katrin Kraeuter

  4. Brain, Performance and Nutrition Research Centre, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK

    Ann-Katrin Kraeuter

  5. NUTRAN, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK

    Ann-Katrin Kraeuter

  6. Department of Neurology, Townsville University Hospital, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia

    Sheryl Juliano & Richard P. White

  7. Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Townsville University Hospital, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia

    Jonathan Golledge

Authors
  1. Joseph V. Moxon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ann-Katrin Kraeuter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. James Phie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sheryl Juliano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Georgina Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Glenys Standley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Cindy Sealey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Richard P. White
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jonathan Golledge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Study design: JVM, RPW, JG; Patient recruitment and clinical diagnosis: SJ, GS, CS, GA, RPW, JG; Laboratory analysis: AKK, JP; Statistical analysis: JVM; Manuscript drafting: JVM, AKK; Funding: JVM, JG; Critical review of manuscript and final approval: All authors. JVM and JG are guarantors for this work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Golledge.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study has ethical clearance from the Townsville Hospital and Health Services Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/12/QTHS/202). All participants provided written informed consent as detailed in the materials and methods.

Consent for publication

N/A.

Competing interests

None of the authors have relevant interests to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplement 1.

Number of patients in whom serum protein markers were detected. Supplement 2. Demographics of included participants according to presentation. Supplement 3. Correlation matrix showing relationship between all assessed serum proteins. Supplement 4. Correlation matrix showing relationship between the serum proteins with pre-hospital symptom duration and NIHSS score. Supplement 5. Graphs showing expression of assessed proteins for all participants according to presentation groups. Supplement 6. Graphs showing expression of assessed proteins for participants with ischaemic stroke according to stroke aetiology (TOAST criteria).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moxon, J.V., Kraeuter, AK., Phie, J. et al. Serum angiopoietin-1 concentration does not distinguish patients with ischaemic stroke from those presenting to hospital with ischaemic stroke mimics. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 22, 462 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02918-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02918-w

Keywords

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2261

Contact us