Skip to main content

Prediction of carotid plaque by blood biochemical indices and related factors based on Fisher discriminant analysis



This study aims to establish the predictive model of carotid plaque formation and carotid plaque location by retrospectively analyzing the clinical data of subjects with carotid plaque formation and normal people, and to provide technical support for screening patients with carotid plaque.


There were 4300 subjects in the ultrasound department of Maanshan People's Hospital collected from December 2013 to December 2018. We used demographic and biochemical data from 3700 subjects to establish predictive models for carotid plaque and its location. The leave-one-out cross-validated classification, 600 external data validation, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were used to verify the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and application value of the model.


There were significant difference of age (F = − 34.049, p < 0.01), hypertension (χ2 = 191.067, p < 0.01), smoking (χ2 = 4.762, p < 0.05) and alcohol (χ2 = 8.306, p < 0.01), Body mass index (F = 15.322, p < 0.01), High-density lipoprotein (HDL) (F = 13.840, p < 0.01), Lipoprotein a (Lp a) (F = 52.074, p < 0.01), Blood Urea Nitrogen (F = 2.679, p < 0.01) among five groups. Prediction models were built: carotid plaque prediction model (Model CP); Prediction model of left carotid plaque only (Model CP Left); Prediction model of right carotid plaque only (Model CP Right). Prediction model of bilateral carotid plaque (Model CP Both). Model CP (Wilks' lambda = 0.597, p < 0.001, accuracy = 78.50%, sensitivity = 78.07%, specificity = 79.07%, AUC = 0.917). Model CP Left (Wilks' lambda = 0.605, p < 0.001, accuracy = 79.00%, sensitivity = 86.17%, specificity = 72.70%, AUC = 0.880). Model CP Right (Wilks' lambda = 0.555, p < 0.001, accuracy = 83.00%, sensitivity = 81.82%, specificity = 84.44%, AUC = 0.880). Model CP Both (Wilks' lambda = 0.651, p < 0.001, accuracy = 82.30%, sensitivity = 89.50%, specificity = 72.70%, AUC = 0.880).


Demographic characteristics and blood biochemical indexes were used to establish the carotid plaque and its location discriminant models based on Fisher discriminant analysis (FDA), which has high application value in community screening.

Peer Review reports


According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, chronic diseases account for major causes of death and health problems: 60 percent (about 35 million) of the world’s population is estimated to die from chronic disease. Currently, cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality around the world [1,2,3]. Carotid plaque in the carotid artery is the most significant risk factor for cardiovascular disease. CVD can be controlled, and earlier treatment and intervention for patients with carotid plaque can effectively reduce the mortality of CVD [4]. However, the clinical diagnosis of carotid plaque is single, expensive, and complex, and can not meet the requirements for the prevention of carotid plaque [5,6,7]. Therefore, appropriate screening tools are integral to the early detection and prevention of major cardiovascular events.

The Fisher discriminant analysis (FDA) is efficient at distinguishing patients from normal people. This field is growing and has the potential to provide useful insights for healthcare systems. FDA was used to predict clinical decisions made by physicians and the outcomes of clinical activity for conditions based on patient features, the model has been applied to predict breast cancer, diabetes 2, and other diseases [8,9,10,11,12]. The establishment of an effective discriminant model has reference significance for early identification of patients with carotid plaque formation in the population, saving social resources for chronic disease prevention and control, and formulating follow-up clinical treatment plans [13,14,15].

However, the diagnostic value of the current prediction model about the carotid plaque is still not high, in view of the advantages of the FDA in constructing the prediction model, in this study, we aimed to establish the predictive models of carotid plaque and the location based on FDA, so as to provide technical support for early screening and intervention.

Research materials and methods

Study subjects

In this study, 3700 subjects underwent carotid artery ultrasound examination in the ultrasound department of Maanshan People's Hospital from 2013 to 2018. A total of 600 subjects underwent carotid artery doppler ultrasound from the physical examination center of Maanshan People's Hospital as external data to evaluate the models. The inclusion criteria were (1) no history of serious cardiovascular disease; (2) no history of tumor; (3) no history of carotid endarterectomy. (4) written informed consent to participate in the study. Exclusion criteria were (1) data missing. (2) history of carotid artery stenting; (3) history of other major diseases. All respondents signed or their family members signed the relevant informed consent.

Questionnaire survey

The questionnaire was developed by radiologists and epidemiologists, reviewed and revised by clinicians and radiologists. The contents of the questionnaire mainly include demographic characteristics (such as age, gender, etc.), history of diseases (such as hypertension, heart disease, diabetes mellitus type 2, etc.), and behavioral characteristics (such as smoking, alcohol, etc.). All investigators were trained uniformly prior to the study, and the survey was conducted in a face-to-face manner between the investigators and participants themselves.


Hypertension was defined as taking antihypertensive drugs or systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mm Hg [16]. Diabetes mellitus was defined as Plasma glucose concentration ≥ 11.1 mmol/L at any time; fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥ 7.0 mmol/L or oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) ≥ 11.1 mmol/L for 2 h [17]. Smoking was defined as Smokers who have smoked continuously or cumulatively for 6 months or more in their life [18]. Alcohol consumption was defined as no less than 50 ml of 56 liquor per day [19].

Body examination

Height measurement required subjects to stand barefooted on the floor of the height meter, with their trunks naturally straight, heads straight, with eyes focused in front, upper limbs drooping naturally, and legs straight. The recorded data on height were accurate to 0.1 cm. Body weight measurement required barefooted subjects to wear shorts and stand naturally in the center of the weight pedal so as to keep their bodies stable. The recorded data were accurate to 0.1 kg. The BMI was calculated by dividing body weight (kg) with the square of the height (m) i.e., m2, to an accuracy of 0.01 kg/m2.

Clinical blood biochemical examination

Fasting venous blood (5 mL) was collected from each subject in the morning, and all samples were analyzed within 24 h. The indicators included triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), glucose (GLU), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), Uric Acid (UA), Apolipoprotein a (APO a), Apolipoprotein b (APO b), creatinine (Cr), cystatin C (CysC) were measured using the Hitachi 7600 automatic biochemical analyzer.

Carotid plaque detection

Patients rest peacefully for 10 min before being examined to keep their heart rate and blood pressure stable. The neck was exposed fully before the examination. 5–13 MHZ linear array probes were used by a professional physician (Aloka-A7 and Aloka-A10, Tokyo; Philips-IU22, Colombia). The internal and external carotid arteries were measured parallel and forward from the left and right common carotid arteries through the bifurcation of the carotid artery. If the patients have plaque, the site, thickness and size of the plaque should also be measured (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

measurement of carotid IMT

Carotid plaque criteria

When the carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) was greater than or equal to 1.5 mm, it was judged as the carotid plaque group, and when the carotid IMT was less than 1.0 mm, it was judged as the normal group [20, 21]. All the participants were divided into five groups according to the location of carotid plaque: CP group (CP in left or right carotid artery), CP left group (CP only in left carotid artery), CP right group (CP only in right carotid artery), CP both group (CP in both sides of carotid artery) and none group (none of CP in carotid artery).

Construction of the discriminant model

Regarding two-class problems, the FDA method identifies a projection vector to maximize between-class scatter matrix while minimizing within-class scatter matrix in the feature space [22, 23].The aim here is to find a linear function equation set.

$${\text{Y}}_{{{\text{CP}}}} = {\text{a}}_{{1}} {\text{X}}_{{1}} + {\text{a}}_{{2}} {\text{X}}_{{2}} + {\text{a}}_{{3}} {\text{X}}_{{3}} + \cdots + {\text{a}}_{{\text{n}}} {\text{X}}_{{\text{n}}} + {\text{C}}$$
$${\text{Y}}_{{{\text{NCP}}}} = {\text{b}}_{{1}} {\text{X}}_{{1}} + {\text{b}}_{{2}} {\text{X}}_{{2}} + {\text{b}}_{{3}} {\text{X}}_{{3}} + \cdots + {\text{b}}_{{\text{n}}} {\text{X}}_{{\text{n}}} + {\text{C}}$$
$${\text{W}}\left( {\text{X}} \right) = {\text{D}}\left( {{\text{X}},{\text{Y}}_{{{\text{CP}}}} } \right) - {\text{D}}\left( {{\text{X}},{\text{Y}}_{{{\text{NCP}}}} } \right)$$

an and bn are standardized coefficients, and C is a constant, which has the following discrimination principles

$${\text{W}}\left( {\text{X}} \right) > 0,{\text{X}} \in {\text{Y}}_{{{\text{CP}}}}$$
$${\text{W}}\left( {\text{X}} \right) < 0,{\text{X}} \in {\text{Y}}_{{{\text{NCP}}}}$$
$${\text{W}}\left( {\text{X}} \right) = 0,{\text{undetermined}}$$

The optimal combination of discriminant variables was screened by the mahalanophanes distance stepwise method.

Statistical analysis

SPSS 18.0 software was used for statistical analysis. continuous data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and categorical variables as percentages. All the continuous data are normalized before fitting the FDA model. The differences between the CP group and the normal group were compared by the F test or chi-square test. The leave-one-out cross-validated classification was applied for the statistical significance of the model construction and the excellence of the model were evaluated by accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. And the models were verified by 600 Physical examination crowd from Maanshan People's Hospital who underwent doppler ultrasound examination. A double-blind trial was used to test the model's ability to distinguish between plaque and healthy people. The FDA score was used to describe the application value of carotid plaque model based on the value of the AUC.


General demographic characteristics and blood biochemical indexes of subjects

Univariate analysis showed that age (F = − 34.049, p < 0.001), gender (χ2 = 9.674, p < 0.022) hypertension (χ2 = 191.067, p < 0.001), smoking (χ2 = 4.762, p < 0.05) and alcohol (χ2 = 8.306, p < 0.001), BMI (F = 15.322, p < 0.001) was significantly different in the five groups. TC (F = 7.420, p < 0.001), TG (F = 7.236, p < 0.001), HDL (F = 13.840, p < 0.01), LDL (F = 5.211, p = 0.011), GLU (F = 12.679, p < 0.05), BUN (F = 12.679, p < 0.001) were significantly different from in the five groups (Table 1).

Table 1 General demographic characteristics and blood biochemical indexes of subjects

Basic information about external data

There were significant difference of hypertension (χ2 = 32.120, p < 0.001), smoking (χ2 = 4.356, p < 0.05) and alcohol (χ2 = 7.332, p < 0.05), creatinine (Cr) (F = 13.365, p < 0.001), Uric Acid (UA) (F = 31.419, p < 0.001), Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) (F = 65.296, p < 0.001) among four groups (Additional file 1: supplementary Table 1).

Collinearity diagnosis of blood biochemical indexes

TG (t = − 4.04, p < 0.001, VIF = 1.636), Lp (a) (t = 10.795, p < 0.001,VIF = 1.073), Cr (t = − 6.32, p < 0.001,VIF = 3.611), Cysc (t = 7.361, p < 0.001, VIF = 3.281), UA (t = 4.129, p < 0.001, VIF = 3.611). VIF is less than 5, and there is no multicollinearity in all blood biochemical indexes, so it can be used in the following discriminant analysis (Additional file 2: supplementary Table 2).

Establishment of Fisher discriminant equation set

In model CP, Wilks' lambda = 0.597, χ2 = 1196.980, p < 0.001. In model CP left group, Wilks' lambda = 0.605, χ2 = 441.594, p < 0.001, In model CP right group, Wilks' lambda = 0.555, χ2 = 479.086, p < 0.001. In model CP Both group, Wilks' lambda = 0.651, χ2 = 1586.68, p < 0.001. According to Wilks' lambda test, the included variables of the four models are statistically significant, and the included variables can help the model carry out correct classification and improve the accuracy of the model (Table 2).

Table 2 Coefficients of model equations

Evaluation of model quality

An important measure of the accuracy of a prediction model is the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve). The AUC of the single continuous variables were all between 0.3 and 0.6 (Fig. 2), which indicated low diagnostic values. The AUC of the FDA scores was higher than the values of single continuous variables. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of the model CP were 86.86%, 88.00%, 80.50%, and 0.917 (95%CI 0.903–0.931) (Additional file 3: supplementary Table 3) respectively. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and AUC of the model CP left were 82.90%, 83.43%, 79.96%, and 0.880 (95%CI 0.878–0.914) (Additional file 4: supplementary Table 4) respectively. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of model CP right were 82.30%, 85.45%, 79.25%, and 0.905 (95%CI 0.888–0.923) (Additional file 5: supplementary Table 5) respectively. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of model CP both were 87.70%, 95.54%, 68.13%, and 0.905 (95%CI 0.888–0.923) (Additional file 6: supplementary Table 6) respectively. In the validation of external data, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the model CP were 78.50%, 78.07%, and 79.07% respectively. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the model CP left were 79.00%, 86.17%, and 72.70% respectively. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the model CP right were 83.00%, 81.82%, and 84.44% respectively. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of the model CP both were 82.30%, 89.50%, and 72.70% respectively (Table 3).

Fig. 2
figure 2

ROC curve was used to evaluate the quality of the model. A Model CP, FDA is better than that of the single continuous variable (BUN, LP a, HDL, BMI, Apo a). B Model CP Left, FDA is better than that of the single continuous variable (UA, BMI, BUN, GLU, LP a, HDL). C Model CP Right, FDA is better than that of the single continuous variable (BMI, BUN, LP a, HDL, LDL).D Model CP Both, FDA is better than that of the single continuous variable (HDL, BMI, GLU, LP a)

Table 3 Evaluation of model quality


Our study has shown that the Fisher discriminant analysis model with carotid artery imaging can be used for predicting the carotid plaque and its location information. Furthermore, the models have excellent accuracy ranging from 78 to 90% in the prediction of carotid plaque and its location. Based on the leave-one-out cross-validation and external data validation, The average accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity was 84.94%, 88.11%, and 76.96%, when the Fisher discriminant analysis models were evaluated.

For the prediction models of cardiovascular disease, the sensitivity of the coronary heart disease prediction model established by Carlo Ricciardi is only 65.4%, which can not fully screen out patients in the crowd. Therefore, the sensitivity was mainly improved, and the sensitivity of the models established was above 80 percent in this study. The higher the sensitivity of a model, the more patients can be screened, and the better the prevention effect at the population level that can be achieved [24, 25]. Based on the population-based screening model, we specifically established the plaque location models to predict the specific location of plaque, to facilitate clinicians and imaging physicians to provide technical support for the prevention and early treatment of carotid plaque in the population.

In our study, in the model, the variables of age, hypertension, BMI, HDL, Lp (a), and BUN were all incorporated into every model building. In the discriminant model, the coefficient of hypertension and HDL was the largest, and the contribution to the discriminant was the highest. This is consistent with the following research, the morbidity of carotid plaque is very high among hypertensive patients [26,27,28]. HDL is a biomarker that has been discovered and has a strong guiding value in the prediction of carotid plaque [29] (Fig. 2).

Different demographic characteristics and blood biochemical indexes were used to construct models for the carotid plaque with presence, on both, the left and right sides. Although there were cross-repeated variables, the contributions of variables to model discrimination were different. Based on the results, the most important factors affecting the incidence of CP were age, hypertension, alcohol, smoking, BMI, HDL, LDL, Lp (a), GLU, BUN, UA, and APO a. However, different from our expected results, the model was not interested in blood biochemical indicators when variables were gradually included in the model, but included a lot of demographic characteristics to help distinguish them. Therefore, factors such as living habits should be noted for carotid plaque. Similarly, previous studies introduced numerous factors affecting the disease and the progress of carotid plaque. These factors were divided into six general groups: environmental factors, daily habits, risk factors, underlying diseases, mental -personality factors, and social factors [28]. Common risk factors associated with CP include hypertension, lifestyle [29], diabetes [30], obesity [31], and smoking [32]. The included variables were consistent with them, indicating the stability and reliability of the study.

In our study, there are some unique variables in the model construction. In the model CP and the model CP left, APO a and UA are unique variables. Firstly, Apolipoprotein A is known to be a protective factor of atherosclerosis, participating in lipid metabolism and preventing atherosclerosis [33]. So apolipoprotein A has a unique discriminant. And on the left side the common carotid artery (CCA) arises directly from the aortic arc, whereas on the right side the CCA originates from the innominate artery [34, 35]. UA can reach the left common carotid artery directly through the aortic arch, so UA has a discriminant effect in the left discriminant model.

There were a few potential weaknesses in the current study. Firstly, the single-site design used only provided a limited generalization of results. Secondly, to further modify and improve the prediction model, diverse statistical methods, such as artificial neural networks, decision trees or logistic regression, are worthy of being performed.


Demographic characteristics and blood biochemical indexes were used, and the carotid plaque screening model was established based on Fisher discriminant analysis. On this basis, we established models to predict the location of plaque. In the models, hypertension and high-density lipoprotein made the highest contribution to the discriminant models and had the greatest influence. More attention should be paid to these two factors in the prevention of carotid plaque. And the screening models has high sensitivity and it is simple to operate in community screening. which can save resources for chronic disease prevention and to provide technical support in screening patients for doctor.

Availability of data and materials

The data of participants are collected by the authors and uploaded to the database, which makes it easier for the authors to use the data in the process of analyzing data and writing manuscripts. This kind of database system can conveniently shield the data irrelevant to the experiment and effectively protect the privacy of participants. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the Maanshan People's Hospital, Maanshan, China. But restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of Maanshan People's Hospital, Maanshan, China. If someone wants to request the data from this study, they can contact Yufeng Wen (corresponding author).



Cardiovascular diseases


Body mass index


Fisher discrimination analysis


Total cholesterol






High-density lipoprotein


Low-density lipoprotein


Blood urea nitrogen


Uric acid

APO a:

Apolipoprotein a

APO b:

Apolipoprotein b


World Health Organization


Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve


Variance inflation factor

ROC curve:

Receiver operator characteristic curve



Lp (a):

Lipoprotein (a)


Cystatin C


Intima-media thickness


  1. Cires-Drouet RS, Mozafarian M, Ali A, Sikdar S, Lal BK. Imaging of high-risk carotid carotid plaques: ultrasound. Semin Vasc Surg. 2017;30(1):44–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Camp G. Cardiovascular disease prevention. Acta Clin Belg. 2014;69(6):407–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cortes-Puch I, Wiley BM, Sun J, et al. Risks of restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategies in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD): a meta-analysis. Transfus Med. 2018;28(5):335–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang YM, Zhang WJ, Chen HY, Yu Y, Wang Y. Value of discriminant analysis for screening of clonorchiasis sinensis. Zhongguo xue xi chong bing fang zhi za zhi Chin J Schistosomiasis Control. 2020;32(2):200–2.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brezinski M, Willard F, Rupnick M. Inadequate Intimal Angiogenesis as a Source of Coronary carotid plaque Instability: Implications for Healing. Circulation. 2019;140(23):1857–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kowara M, Cudnoch-Jedrzejewska A. Pathophysiology of Atherosclerotic carotid plaque Development-Contemporary Experience and New Directions in Research. Int J Mol. Sci. 2021;22(7).

  7. Vergallo R, Crea F. Atherosclerotic carotid plaque Healing. Reply. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(3):294.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Choubey DK, Kumar M, Shukla V, Tripathi S, Dhandhania VK. Comparative analysis of classification methods with PCA and LDA for diabetes. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2020;16(8):833–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Newman H, Milne N, Lewis SB. Neurosurgical anatomy of the internal carotid artery: magnetic resonance imaging study of the sellar region. World Neurosurg. 2020;133:e711–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ni M, Zhou X, Liu J, et al. Prediction of the clinicopathological subtypes of breast cancer using a Fisher discriminant analysis model based on radiomic features of diffusion-weighted MRI. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):1073.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ricciardi C, Valente AS, Edmund K, et al. Linear discriminant analysis and principal component analysis to predict coronary artery disease. Health Inform J. 2020;26(3):2181–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang HQ, Zhu HL, Cho WC, Yip TT, Ngan RK, Law SC. Method of regulatory network that can explore protein regulations for disease classification. Artif Intell Med. 2010;48(2–3):119–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Azofeifa A, Stroup DF, Lyerla R, et al. Evaluating behavioral health surveillance systems. Prevent Chronic Dis. 2018;15:E53.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Battersby M, Kidd MR, Licinio J, et al. Improving cardiovascular health and quality of life in people with severe mental illness: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2018;19(1):366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Reininger BM, Wang J, Fisher-Hoch SP, Boutte A, Vatcheva K, McCormick JB. Non-communicable diseases and preventive health behaviors: a comparison of Hispanics nationally and those living along the US-Mexico border. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chalmers J, MacMahon S, Mancia G, Whitworth J, Beilin L, Hansson L, Neal B, Rodgers A, NiMhurchu C, Clark T. 1999 World Health Organization-International Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of hypertension. Guidelines sub-committee of the World Health Organization. Clin Exp Hypertens. 1999;21(5–6):1009–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Balasubramanyam A. Defining and classifying new subgroups of diabetes. Annu Rev Med. 2021;72:63–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shiffman S, Holt NM. Smoking trajectories of adult never smokers 12 months after first purchase of a JUUL starter kit. Am J Health Behav. 2021;45(3):527–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Delker E, Brown Q, Hasin DS. Alcohol consumption in demographic subpopulations: an epidemiologic overview. Alcohol Res. 2016;38(1):7–15.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Murray CSG, Nahar T, Kalashyan H, Becher H, Nanda NC. Ultrasound assessment of carotid arteries: current concepts, methodologies, diagnostic criteria, and technological advancements. Echocardiography. 2018;35(12):2079–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Touboul PJ, Hennerici MG, Meairs S, et al. Mannheim carotid intima-media thickness and carotid plaque consensus (2004–2006–2011). An update on behalf of the advisory board of the 3rd, 4th and 5th watching the risk symposia, at the 13th, 15th and 20th European Stroke Conferences, Mannheim, Germany, 2004, Brussels, Belgium, 2006, and Hamburg, Germany, 2011. Cerebrovascular diseases. 2012;34(4):290–6.

  22. Diaz-Vico D, Dorronsoro JR. Deep least squares fisher discriminant analysis. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2020;31(8):2752–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang H, Lu X, Hu Z, Zheng W. Fisher discriminant analysis with L1-norm. IEEE Trans Cybern. 2014;44(6):828–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Leeflang MM, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Hooft L, Bossuyt PM. Variation of a test’s sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence. CMAJ. 2013;185(11):E537–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Botvin Moshe C, Haratz S, Ravona-Springer R, et al. Long-term trajectories of BMI predict carotid stiffness and carotid plaque volume in type 2 diabetes older adults: a cohort study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020;19(1):138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kokubo Y, Matsumoto C. Hypertension is a risk factor for several types of heart disease: review of prospective studies. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;956:419–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fuchs FD, Whelton PK. High blood pressure and cardiovascular disease. Hypertension. 2020;75(2):285–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dhingra R, Vasan RS. Age as a risk factor. Med Clin North Am. 2012;96(1):87–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lam BC, Koh GC, Chen C, Wong MT, Fallows SJ. Comparison of body mass index (BMI), body adiposity index (BAI), waist circumference (WC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) as predictors of cardiovascular disease risk factors in an adult population in Singapore. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(4): e0122985.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Forbes CA, Quek RG, Deshpande S, Worthy G, Wolff R, Stirk L, Kleijnen J, Gandra SR, Djedjos S, Wong ND. The relationship between Lp (a) and CVD outcomes: a systematic review. Lipids Health Dis. 2016;15:95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. O’Keefe EL, DiNicolantonio JJ, O’Keefe JH, Lavie CJ. Alcohol and CV Health: Jekyll and Hyde J-Curves. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2018;61(1):68–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kondo T, Nakano Y, Adachi S, Murohara T. Effects of tobacco smoking on cardiovascular disease. Circ J. 2019;83(10):1980–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nicholls SJ, Hsu A, Wolski K, Hu B, Bayturan O, Lavoie A, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-derived measures of coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden and clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(21):2399–407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Murthy VL, Naya M, Foster CR, Gaber M, Hainer J, Klein J, et al. Association between coronary vascular dysfunction and cardiac mortality in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2012;126(15):1858–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Perk J, De Backer G, Gohlke H, Graham I, Reiner Z, Verschuren M, et al. European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & rehabilitation (EACPR); ESC Committee for practice guidelines (CPG). European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (ver 2012). The fifth joint task force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Euro Heart J. 2012;33(13):1635–701.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


First of all, the authors would like to thank all the staff from the Maanshan People's Hospital who were involved in this work. Secondly, the authors would like to thank the study participants for their cooperation.


This work was supported by the Teaching Reform and Quality Improvement Plan of the Department of Education of Anhui Province-Teaching Teacher (Grant Number 2019jxms066); The Teaching Reform and Quality Improvement Plan of the Department of Education of Anhui Province-Teaching Team (Grant Number 2018jxtd153).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



YW designed the research. Jian Hu participated in data collection and analysis and drafted the manuscript. FS, XR, LC, YZ, YF, GT, MJ, HW helped analyze data and manuscript development. YW provided research funding and software support. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yufeng Wen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All protocols are carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Ethical approval was received from the Medical Ethics Committee of Wannan Medical College. This study was based on data from Ultrasonic Department at Maanshan People's Hospital in Anhui, China. This study has obtained the participants written informed consent. The study protocol conforms to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki. Review board of the hospital approved the study and all subjects provided informed consent (The Medical Ethics Committee of Maanshan People's Hospital, No. 2014001).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary Table 1

. Demographic and blood biochemical indicators of external data.

Additional file 2: Supplementary Table 2

. Collinearity diagnosis of blood biochemical indexes.

Additional file 3: Supplementary Table 3

. Coordinates of ROC curve for the single continuous variables and FDA scores to diagnose CP.

Additional file 4: Supplementary Table 4

. Coordinates of ROC curve for the single continuous variables and FDA scores to predict CP Left.

Additional file 5: Supplementary Table 5

. Coordinates of ROC curve for the single continuous variables and FDA scores to predict CP Right.

Additional file 6: Supplementary Table 6

. Coordinates of ROC curve for the single continuous variables and FDA scores to predict CP Both.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, J., Su, F., Ren, X. et al. Prediction of carotid plaque by blood biochemical indices and related factors based on Fisher discriminant analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 22, 371 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: