Skip to main content

Prevalence of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors in adult patients with haemophilia: a cross-sectional study in a tertiary care hospital clinic in Sri Lanka

Abstract

Background

Management of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with haemophilia is extremely challenging. Therefore, knowing the prevalence of CVD and risk factors in this population is imperative.

Methods

All consented patients ≥ 18 years of age attending the haemophilia clinic at a tertiary care centre were recruited to the study. Data were collected using a pretested, investigator administered questionnaire. Seated blood pressure, anthropometric measurements and blood samples were obtained using standard techniques. Lipid profile and fasting plasma glucose were estimated. Prevalence of risk factors for CVD was compared with those of age matched males in the general population. P values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Of the total 109 participants, 92 (84.4%) had haemophilia A. The median age of the study group was 36 years. Three (2.8%) had at least one cardiovascular disease. There were 10 (9.2%), 30 (27.5%), 13 (11.9%) and 4 (3.7%) participants with diabetes, hypertension, current smoking and obesity (Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2) respectively. 32 (29.4%) and 37 (33.9%) participants had waist circumference ≥ 90 cm and waist hip ratio ≥ 0.9 respectively. 38 (34.9%) had total cholesterol ≥ 200 mg/dl, 43 (39.5%) had low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol ≥ 130 mg/dl, 25 (22.9%) had triglycerides (TG) ≥ 150 mg/dl and 58 (53.2%) had High density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol < 40 mg/dl. Diabetes was significantly associated with factor levels below 5% (p = 0.038). BMI, waist circumference and dyslipidaemia in the study were significantly higher compared to the general population.

Conclusion

The study signifies an increased prevalence of risk factors for CVD among patients with haemophilia and the need for preventive measures.

Peer Review reports

Background

Haemophilia is a rare X linked recessive inherited bleeding disorder. [1]. Factor levels < 1%, 1–5% and > 5% are considered severe, moderate and mild respectively [2]. Over the past few decades, treatment of haemophilia has seen major advances thus the quality of life as well as the life expectancy of patients have increased [3,4,5,6]. With more patients living up to an older age, emergence of age-related comorbidities such as CVD in them have raised a concern [6]. As the treatment modalities for CVD are based on blood thinning and antiplatelet effects, management of this group of patients has proved to be quite challenging due to their inherent bleeding tendency [7].

Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia, smoking and obesity are well known modifiable risk factors for CVD. Abdominal obesity in particular, is evidenced to exacerbate other risk factors and promote CVD [8]. Existing data suggest that the prevalence of these risk factors in patients with haemophilia is variable when compared with the general population [9,10,11,12,13].

Although traditionally it was believed that patients with haemophilia have a low risk for arterial thromboses due to their intrinsic hypocoagulable state, recent research data looking at the prevalence of CVD have shown mixed results [9, 11,12,13]. Several studies have demonstrated an increased risk of CVD and its risk factors in patients with haemophilia compared to the general population [9, 10].

In Sri Lanka, comprehensive care for patients with haemophilia has improved greatly over the years in keeping with the global trends. This study was performed with the aim of obtaining, prevalence data for CVD and risk factors among adult haemophilia patients since it is a timely need. Also, we aimed to compare the prevalence data with the existing data of the general population of the same gender, to find out whether there are any significant variations that might be resulting from the background coagulopathy.

Materials and methods

This descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out in the largest haemophilia center in Sri Lanka after obtaining ethical approval for the study from the Ethics Review Committee, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka (FERCAP accredited). All the patients ≥ 18 years of age attending the hemophilia clinic and consented were recruited to the study. Patients with uncertain factor levels and carrier women were excluded from the study. Socio-demographic data (age, race, religion, current employment and monthly family income), data on CVD events (coronary artery disease, non haemorrhagic stroke and transient ischaemic attack) and risk factors (diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia and smoking status) were collected using a pre-tested, interviewer administered questionnaire and clinical records.

Height, waist and hip circumferences were measured to the nearest centimeter according to standard methods. Weight was measured into the nearest gram using standard methods [14, 15]. The BMI was calculated as the body weight in kilograms divided by the height in meters squared. The waist hip ratio was obtained by dividing waist circumference by hip circumference. After relaxing for 5–10 min, seated blood pressure (BP) was measured using a validated mercury sphygmomanometer using standard technique [16]. BP was measured twice with a gap of five minutes and averaged.

Venous blood samples were collected for fasting plasma glucose and lipid profile using standard techniques after an overnight fast of 12 h from the patients who were not diagnosed of having diabetes or dyslipidaemia respectively [17]. Samples were analyzed using a fully automated analyzer (Abbott architect c8000 biochemistry). The assay methods have been validated and appropriate quality control measures were applied to ensure reliability of results.

Participants were considered to have hypertension if they had been previously diagnosed (verified through previous medical records and anti-hypertensive prescriptions) or if the average of two resting seated BP readings, separated by 5 min were ≥ 140/90 mmHg [18]. Patients were considered to have diabetes if they had been previously diagnosed (verified through previous medical records, laboratory reports and prescriptions) or by having a fasting venous plasma glucose ≥ 126 mg/dl (World Health Organization and American Diabetes Association criteria) [19, 20]. Lipid profiles were categorized as normal and high according to National Cholesterol Education Programme/Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP/ATP III) criteria [21].

The data were analyzed with SPSS 20 software. Prevalence of CVD and risk factors were determined by calculating the proportions and were compared with that of the general population. The significance of the differences between proportions (%) and means were tested using χ2-test and Student’s t-test, z test for proportions respectively. P values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

The total number of participants was 109 and the mean age of the study group was 37.7 ± SD 12.8 years. Majority (76.1%, n = 83) of the participants were employed and of 73.5% the monthly family income was > 10 000 LKR (50 USD) (Table 1).

Table 1 Frequency distribution of the selected socio-demographic characteristics of the participants (N = 109)

Majority of the participants (84.4%, n = 92) had hemophilia A, and 51.4% (n = 56) had factor levels < 1%. Most of the participants (57.8%, n = 63) were on prophylaxis, while inhibitors had never been detected in 57.8% (n = 63) participants (Table 2).

Table 2 Characteristics related to hemophilia (N = 109)

The prevalence of at least one diagnosed CVD among the participants was 2.8% (n = 3) (Table 3).

Table 3 Prevalence of cardiovascular diseases among the participants (N = 109)

Majority (53.2%) had HDL cholesterol < 40 mg/dl as a risk factor for CVD. The prevalence of risk factors in the study group is given in Table 4.

Table 4 Prevalence of selected risk factors for cardiovascular diseases among the participants (N = 109)

Prevalence of selected risk factors for CVD in the study group show significantly higher BMI, waist circumference and dyslipidaemia (p < 0.00001) compared to the age matched males (Table 5).

Table 5 Comparison of the prevalence of selected risk factors for cardiovascular diseases in the study with the general population

Of all the CVD risk factors, only diabetes was significantly associated with the severity of haemophilia (Table 6).

Table 6 Association between severity of haemophilia and risk factors for cardiovascular diseases

Discussion

In this study, the prevalence of CVD and its risk factors in patients with haemophilia aged 18 and above in the largest treatment centre of Sri Lanka was assessed and compared with available data for the general population. Both haemophilia A and B patients were included in the study irrespective of their factor levels, inhibitor status or whether on prophylaxis. Majority of the participants (N = 94, 86.2%) in the study group were below 50 years of age. This reflects inclusion of younger patients in the prophylaxis program. In keeping with global statistics, majority (84%) of participants were having haemophilia A. Higher proportion (85.3%, n = 93) of the participants had either severe or moderate haemophilia.

Even though it is hypothesized that the severe form of haemophilia is protective against thrombotic events, existing literature has conflicting evidence on this [9,10,11,12,13]. Knowing prevalence of CVD and its risk factors among patients with haemophilia would enable implementing timely preventive measures.

In our study, there were three patients (2.8%) with coronary heart disease and one patient with non haemorrhagic stroke. The participants with TIA and stroke also had coronary events in the past. Studies conducted to assess the prevalence of cardiovascular diseases in adult general population in Sri Lanka show prevalence of coronary heart disease in 16/1000 and prevalence of stroke and risk factors for stroke in /1000 although these are not directly comparable to the current study [24, 25].

Comparison of CVD risk factors of the study population with the data stated for males (n = 1758) in Sri Lanka diabetes and cardiovascular study (SLDCS) carried out in healthy participants who were aged ≥ 18 years shows that, dyslipidaemia, BMI and waist circumference were significantly higher among patients with haemophilia, than normal healthy adults [23]. According to SLDCS, prevalence of dyslipidaemia in Sri Lanka exceeds most of the regional and non-Asian countries. Further, it states that “Sri Lankans have a unique pattern of dyslipidaemia with lower HDL cholesterol, higher triglycerides and higher LDL cholesterol”. In our study, the prevalence of high LDL, TG and low HDL were 39.5%, 22.9% and 53.2% respectively, in keeping with the pattern described in the SLDCS.

In the retrospective study carried out by Ming Y. Lim et al. in 58 haemophilia patients attending the Mayo Comprehensive Haemophilia Clinic during 2006–2009 period, the prevalence of CVD risk factors was analyzed and compared with the existing data for the general population. They have found a higher prevalence of hypertension and a lower prevalence of current smoking and obesity. Diabetes in the sample was similar in prevalence to the general population statistics while they could not assess the prevalence of dyslipidaemia due to missing data [26].

In a large US study (J. Pocoski et al. 2013), when compared to age-matched males in the general population, 2506 patients with haemophilia were found to have a significantly higher prevalence of coronary artery disease (10.7% vs 5.8%, P < 0.001), hypertension (22.6% vs 15.5%, P < 0.001) and hyperlipidaemia (15.9% vs 11.9%, P = 0.001). Also, they found that cardiovascular comorbidities in patients with haemophilia occurred at an earlier age than the general population. However, their study did not assess the prevalence of other CVD risk factors like obesity, diabetes, family history and smoking status and they have included only patients with haemophilia A. They have hypothesized that similar to other chronic inflammatory disorders, incidence of CVD might have increased in patients with haemophilia as they have chronically inflamed joints as a result of recurrent joint bleeds [10].

In a second retrospective database analysis, Pocoski J et al. were able to confirm the previous study findings of increased cardiovascular comorbidities in patients with haemophilia A in the US [27].

Significantly increased prevalence of obesity, increased waist circumference and dyslipidemia in the current study might have resulted from limited mobility and lack of proper physical exercise due to the fear of bleeding. Interestingly, the smoking habits were significantly lower in the study population compared to normal healthy adult males in Sri Lanka [23].

The significant association of diabetes mellitus observed in participants with severe haemophilia in the current study urge further studies to ascertain underlying causative factors. An increased prevalence of hypertension in patients with haemophilia was not evident in this study even though it was shown in several studies [10, 26, 28, 29].

The main limitation in this study is the lack of a control group. In addition, although the prevalence of CVD in patients with haemophilia was calculated, it could not be compared with the healthy adult population of the country due to lack of a matched control group. Very low number of patients with actual CVD has made analysis of associations with factor levels and inhibitor status invalid. Also, there is a possibility of missing patients with actual CVD but no documentation, as we have considered only those with a clearly documented history of CVD as positive.

Conclusions and recommendations

The prevalence of diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia, increased BMI, waist circumference and cardiovascular events were substantially high among patients with haemophilia. This stresses the need for screening and active measures to control these risk factors to prevent cardiovascular events in patients with haemophilia. Further research using larger sample size and active control groups are recommended to validate these findings.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

BMI:

Body mass index

BP:

Blood pressure

CABG:

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

CVD:

Cardiovascular disease

HDL:

High Density Lipoprotein

FERCAP:

Forum for Ethical Review Committees in the Asian and Western Pacific Region

LDL:

Low Density Lipoprotein

LKR:

Sri Lankan Rupees

NCEP/ATP III:

National Cholesterol Education Programme/Adult Treatment Panel III

NHSL:

National Hospital of Sri Lanka

SLDCS:

Sri Lanka diabetes and cardiovascular study

TG:

Triglycerides

TIA:

Transient Ischaemic Attack

USD:

United States Dollar

References

  1. Srivastava A, Santagostino E, Dougall A, et al. WFH guidelines for the management of hemophilia. Haemophilia. 2020;26:1–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. White GC II, Rosendaal F, Aledort LM, et al. Definitions in hemophilia: recommendation of the Scientific Subcommittee on Factor VIII and Factor IX of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Thromb Haemost. 2001;85(3):560.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ling G, Nathwani AC, Tuddenham EG. Recent advances in developing specific therapies for haemophilia. Br J Haematol. 2018;181(2):161–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pasi KJ, Rangarajan S, Mitchell N, et al. Multiyear follow-up of AAV5-hFVIII-SQ gene therapy for hemophilia A. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(1):29–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Franchini M, Mannucci PM. The history of hemophilia. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2014;40:571–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shapiro S, Makris M. Haemophilia and ageing. Br J Haematol. 2019;184(5):712–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cayla G, Morange PE, Chambost H, et al. Management of cardiovascular disease in haemophilia. Thromb Res. 2013;132(1):8–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ôunpuu S, et al. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case–control study. Lancet. 2004;364(9438):937–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sharathkumar AA, Soucie JM, Trawinski B, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events among patients with haemophilia: experience of a single haemophilia treatment centre in the United States (US). Haemophilia. 2011;17(4):597–604.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pocoski J, Ma A, Kessler CM, et al. Cardiovascular comorbidities are increased in U.S. patients with haemophilia A: a retrospective database analysis. Haemophilia. 2014;20:472–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sood SL, Cheng D, Ragni M, et al. A cross-sectional analysis of cardiovascular disease in the hemophilia population. Blood Adv. 2018;2(11):1325–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Biere-Rafi S, Baarslag MA, Peters M, et al. Cardiovascular risk assessment in haemophilia patients. Thromb Haemost. 2011;105(02):274–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rizwan I, Minuk L, Jackson S, et al. Cardiovascular disease prevalence and relevance in haemophilia: a scoping review. Haemophilia. 2015;21(3):e156–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jelliffe DB. The assessment of the nutritional status of the community (with special reference to field surveys in developing regions of the world). Monogr Ser World Health Organ. 1966;53:3–271.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. World Health Organization. Waist circumference and waist-hip ratio: report of a WHO expert consultation, Geneva, 8–11 December 2008.

  16. Smith L. New AHA recommendations for blood pressure measurement. Am Fam Phys. 2005;72(7):1391.

    Google Scholar 

  17. World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on drawing blood: best practices in phlebotomy. World Health Organization; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. Seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42(6):1206–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. WHO. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Report of a WHO Consultation. Part 1. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Document number WHO/NCD/NCS/99.2. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1999.

  20. American Diabetes Association. Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:1183–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation. 2005;112:2735–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. World Health Organization Expert Consultation. Appropriate Body Mass Index (BMI) for Asian populations and its implication for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004;363:157–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Katulanda P, Dissanayake HA, De Silva SN, et al. Prevalence, patterns, and associations of dyslipidemia among Sri Lankan adults—Sri Lanka Diabetes and Cardiovascular Study in 2005–2006. J Clin Lipidol. 2018;12(2):447–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mendis S, Ekanayake EM. Prevalence of coronary heart disease and cardiovascular risk factors in middle aged males in a defined population in central Sri Lanka. Int J Cardiol. 1994;46(2):135–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chang T, Gajasinghe S, Arambepola C. Prevalence of stroke and its risk factors in urban Sri Lanka: population-based study. Stroke. 2015;46(10):2965–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lim MY, Pruthi RK. Cardiovascular disease risk factors: prevalence and management in adult hemophilia patients. Blood Coag Fibrinol. 2011;22(5):402–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Humphries TJ, Ma A, Kessler CM, et al. A second retrospective database analysis confirms prior findings of apparent increased cardiovascular comorbidities in hemophilia A in the United States. Am J Hematol. 2016;91(5):E298–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Barnes RF, Cramer TJ, Sait AS, et al. The hypertension of hemophilia is not explained by the usual cardiovascular risk factors: results of a cohort study. Int J Hypertens. 2016;2016:2014201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Barnes RF, Cramer TJ, Hughes TH, et al. The hypertension of hemophilia is associated with vascular remodeling in the joint. Microcirculation. 2017;24(7):e12387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study is funded by an investigator-initiated unconditional financial grant from Aj medichem International, Sri Lanka.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TV, CW and VR designed the study. TV and GK collected data. CHR did the statistical analysis. TV, CW and CHR wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thamudika Vithanage.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical clearance for this study was obtained by the Ethical Review Committee, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka (FERCAP accredited) (Ref. number – EC – 19 - 001) and was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed written consent was taken from all the volunteer participants of the study.

Consent for publication

Informed written consent for publication without direct personal identification details (such as name and address) was obtained from all the participants.

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vithanage, T., Ratnamalala, V., Wickramaratne, C. et al. Prevalence of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors in adult patients with haemophilia: a cross-sectional study in a tertiary care hospital clinic in Sri Lanka. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 22, 343 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02789-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02789-1

Keywords

  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Haemophilia
  • Prevalence
  • Risk factors
  • Hypertension