Skip to main content

Association of body mass index with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction among ambulatory individuals with diabetes mellitus in rural Uganda: a cross-sectional study

Abstract

Background

Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) is a recognized complication of diabetes mellitus that precedes and is a risk factor for heart failure. We aimed to determine the prevalence of LVDD and its association with body mass index in ambulatory adults with diabetes mellitus in rural Uganda.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study, over 5 months, to enroll 195 ambulatory Ugandan adults living with diabetes mellitus for at least five years at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital. We collected demographic, and clinical data and measured body mass index (BMI). Echocardiography was performed to determine LVDD by assessing the mitral inflow ventricular filling velocities (E/A and E/è ratios), tricuspid regurgitant jet peak velocity, and left atrium maximum volume index. We used logistic regression to estimate the odds ratio for the association of LVDD with BMI and evaluated the variation of associations by age and hypertension status.

Results

Of the 195 participants, 141 (72.31%) were female, the mean age was 62 [standard deviation, 11.50] years, and the median duration of diabetes diagnosis was 10 [interquartile range, 7, 15] years. Eighty-six percent (n = 168) had LVDD with the majority (n = 127, 65.1%) of participants in the grade 1 category of LVDD. In the adjusted model, the odds of LVDD for each 1 kg/m2 increase in BMI was 1.11 [95% confidence interval 1.00, 1.25, p = 0.04]. The adjusted odds of LVDD among individuals aged ≥ 50 years with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 was 13.82 times the odds of LVDD in individuals aged < 50 years with BMI < 25 kg/m2.

Conclusion

LVDD is prevalent and positively associated with BMI among ambulatory Ugandan adults living with diabetes mellitus for at least five years. The association was higher for older overweight/obese than younger individuals with normal weight. Future studies should focus on the effect of weight loss on LVDD as a possible target for the prevention of heart failure.

Peer Review reports

Background

Despite advances in preventive and therapeutic care, individuals with diabetes mellitus (diabetes) have up to an eightfold risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared to individuals without diabetes [1]. The overall risk of congestive heart failure is as high as 23%, which is three times the overall risk of congestive heart failure among individuals without diabetes [2]. Moreover, at least two-thirds of overall mortality in people with diabetes is due to CVD [1]. The morbidity and mortality due to diabetes are worse in Africa where diabetes and CVD often go undiagnosed until disease complications are evident [3, 4].

Aside from atherosclerotic and coronary diseases, several pathways including left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) play a key role in the pathogenesis of heart failure and contribute to the heightened mortality [1, 5, 6]. LVDD per se is associated with an increased risk of subclinical atherosclerosis and ischemic heart disease [7]. In individuals with diabetes, the etiology of LVDD is often multifactorial with chronic hyperglycemia, overweight/obesity, and hypertension as the main contributing factors that eventually lead to morphological and physiological changes in the heart muscle [5, 8]. These factors synergistically worsen LVDD, and coronary blood flow thereby exacerbating ischemic heart disease and subsequently leading to overt heart failure [6, 9].

Body mass index (BMI) is a modifiable risk factor that could be a potentially interventional target to improve left ventricular diastolic function in individuals with diabetes. Interestingly, obese individuals with diabetes have repeated left ventricular myocardial damage possibly from complex pathophysiological interactions of obese-induced adipokines, leptin, and insulin [10] resulting in higher LVDD in obese individuals with diabetes compared to normal-weight individuals with diabetes. Also, obesity per se increases the risk of type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension which are known risk factors for LVDD [8, 11].

Despite the increase in the burden of overweight/obesity and diabetes in developing countries [12, 13], little is known about the association of overweight/obesity with the LVDD in individuals living with diabetes. Filling this knowledge gap could highlight the burden of LVDD in this high-risk population and identify groups with the highest-burden in whom targeted interventions are of maximum public health benefit.

Although echocardiographic screening for individuals with diabetes enables early detection of LVDD before overt heart failure sets in, in poor-resource settings screening echocardiography is either not available or affordable to those who need it. This represents a missed opportunity for optimization of treatment to prevent/delay disease progression and early diagnosis of heart failure [14]. In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalence of LVDD and its association with BMI among ambulatory adults with diabetes in Uganda.

Methods

Study design and setting

This was a single-center cross-sectional study of ambulatory adult individuals with diabetes at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital (MRRH), the largest (more than 1500 active individuals) referral hospital in south-western Uganda.

Participants’ recruitment and eligibility criteria

Between November 2017 and March 2018, we enrolled a consecutive sample of ambulatory individuals aged 18 years or greater with a self-reported history of diabetes and taking medications for glycemic control for 5 years or more. We excluded individuals with 1) a documented medical history of heart failure, valvular heart disease, arrhythmia, or thyroid disorders, and 2) a history of hazardous intake of alcohol (based on the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test). All individuals were consecutively identified and enrolled by a research assistant as they were logging in during their routine clinic visits. All consents used in this study were translated into the local language and informed written consent was obtained from all respondents.

Data collection

We used a standardized quantitative questionnaire to collect data including participants’ age, occupational status, educational level, smoking habit, symptoms, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status, duration of diabetes, and history of hypertension.

Blood pressure

Blood pressure was measured following standardized procedures using automatic blood pressure monitors (Omron Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) with cuff sizes appropriate to individual participants. The participant was seated in a chair and allowed to rest for 5 min before three measurements were performed at 3-min intervals. We used the average of the second and third measurements to determine the blood pressure of each participant [15].

Body mass index

We measured weight and height using a weighing scale with a stadiometer (ADE Germany GmbH & Co. KG, Hamburg, Germany). Height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm and weight was measured to the nearest kilogram. The plausible ranges for the anthropometric measurements were set as 100 to 200 cm for height, and 30 to 150 kg for weight. Values outside of these ranges were set to missing. We used height and weight to calculate BMI as weight (in kilograms) divided by the square of height (in meters), and categorized BMI as underweight (< 18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25 to 29.9 kg/m2), or obese (> 30 kg/m2) [16].

Laboratory-based measurements

We collected blood specimens and measured glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (Siemens DCA Vantage™ analyzer, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Ltd, Frimley, Camberley, UK), low-density lipoproteins (LDL) (Humastar200™, Human Diagnostics Worldwide, Wiesbaden, Germany) and estimated urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) using the (Humastar200™, Human Diagnostics Worldwide, Wiesbaden, Germany). Laboratory tests were performed at the MRRH laboratory which has standardized internal quality control protocols and participates in external quality control programs by the National Health Laboratory Service.

Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction

F.C.A, a trained physician echocardiographer performed echocardiography (Philips HD7 XE Diagnostic ultrasound system, China) according to the recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of cardiovascular imaging 2016 guidelines for the evaluation of LVDD [17]. We classed LVDD as (i) grade 1 if a mitral inflow E/A ratio ≤ 0.8 with peak E velocity ≤ 50 cm/second [or E/A ≤ 0.8 and peak E > 50 cm/second or E/A > 0.8 and < 2 in addition to either tricuspid regurgitation (TR) jet peak velocity > 2.8 m/second, average E/è > 14 (or lateral E/è ratio > 13 or septal E/è > 15) or left atrium (LA) maximum volume index > 34 ml/m2]; (ii) grade 2 if E/A ratio > 0.8 and < 2 (or ≤ 0.8 and peak E velocity > 50 cm/second) with at least two of the following parameters present, TR jet peak velocity > 2.8 m/second, average E/è > 14, or LA maximum volume index > 34 ml/m2; and (iii) grade 3 if E/A ratio ≥ 2 [17].

Statistical analysis

After excluding poor quality echocardiographic imagines, we summarized normally distributed continuous variables by means (standard deviations) and the skewed continuous variables by medians (interquartile range). Categorical variables were grouped by frequencies and percentages. The prevalence of LVDD was determined as the proportion of those with LVDD in the overall study sample and further categorized by LVDD grades.

We used logistic regression to determine the odds ratio for the association between LVDD and BMI adjusted for confounding by a priori known factors including age (< 50 vs ≥ 50) years, sex (male vs female), hypertension (yes or no), HIV status (HIV-infected or HIV-uninfected), smoking (smoker or never), duration of diabetes (continuous) in years, HbA1c% (continuous), and LDL (continuous) mmol/L. In addition, we evaluated the variation of association of LVDD and BMI (< 25 vs ≥ 25 kg/m2) across; 1) age (< 50 vs ≥ 50) years and 2) hypertension (yes vs no) in the log odds (multiplicative) scale. All statistical analysis was conducted using Stata 13 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas, USA).

Results

Overall, 998 individuals with diabetes were screened for eligibility. Of these, 782 had diabetes for less than five years, five had atrial fibrillation, four had a hazardous intake of alcohol, and one with history of hyperthyroidism. In addition, nine declined to consent, and two had poor echocardiographic windows. Of the 195 included in the analysis, the mean age was 62 [standard deviation (SD), 11.50] years and 141 (72.31%) were females. The median duration of diabetes was 10 [interquartile range (IQR) 7, 15] years with a median (IQR) HbA1c of 9.1% (7.7, 10.9). One hundred forty-six (74.87%) had a history of hypertension, median (IQR) blood pressure was 145 (128, 158) mmHg for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and 81 (75, 89) mmHg for diastolic pressure, 70 (36.08%) were overweight (BMI, 25–29.9 kg/m2) and 60 (30.93%) were obese (BMI, ≥ 30 kg/m2) (Table 1).

Table 1 Baseline socio-demographic and clinical characteristics

The prevalence of LVDD was found at 86.15% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80, 0.90]. Overall, 127 (65.13%) had grade 1 diastolic dysfunction (Table 1). In the fully adjusted model, we found that each 1 kg/m2 increase in BMI was associated with a 1.119 [95% CI 1.00, 1.24, p = 0.041] odds of LVDD (Table 2). In addition, we found that participants who were doubly exposed to BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 and aged ≥ 50 years had 13.82 times higher odds of LVDD than those with BMI < 25 kg/m2 and aged < 50 years (Fig. 1A). The association was higher for those with obesity/overweight and hypertension compared to individuals with normal blood pressure and normal weight (Fig. 1B).

Table 2 Factors associated with increased odds of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, n = 195
Fig. 1
figure 1

Variation of the association of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) and body mass index (BMI) across age (A) and hypertension status (B)

Discussion

In this study, the prevalence of LVDD was very high among ambulatory adults with diabetes in rural Uganda and highest among those older with overweight/obesity than those younger with normal weight; and among those overweight/obese with hypertension than those with normal weight and blood pressure.

In the current study, the prevalence of LVDD was higher than reported by prior studies. Muddu et al. reported the prevalence of LVDD as 55% in ambulatory adults with diabetes in Kampala, Uganda [18] while in Egypt [19] the prevalence of LVDD in individuals with diabetes was 61%. Both studies recruited newly diagnosed individuals with diabetes whereas the current study enrolled individuals with at least 5 years of living with diabetes. The heterogeneity could be because individuals with a longer duration of diabetes have prolonged hyperglycemia, prevalent hypertension, overweight/obesity, and dyslipidemia amongst other comorbid conditions which are known to cause LVDD [5, 8, 20]. In contrast, a study from Nigeria reported a 79% prevalence of LVDD [21], which is slightly lower than the findings of the current study. The study sample in the current study was on average 12 years older than the sample in the Nigerian study which in part explains the higher prevalence of LVDD since older age is associated with physiological delay in relaxation of the heart muscle causing diastolic dysfunction [22, 23].

Also, a study from Iraq reported a 62% prevalence of LVDD in asymptomatic adults with diabetes in an urban hospital [24]. While in another study from India, a 54% prevalence of LVDD among asymptomatic individuals with at least 5 years of type 2 diabetes was reported [9]. Both studies had younger populations compared to those in the current study. And in the latter study, individuals with hypertension were excluded. Another large population-based cross-sectional study from Australia reported a 34.7% prevalence of LVDD in a study population with a mean age of 69 years. Despite some similarities, the current study was hospital-based where individuals with the complicated forms of the disease are more likely to present and be enrolled than in the community-based studies [25]. Moreover, in Europe, a study done by Jorgensen and colleagues found a 19% prevalence of LVDD among individuals with type 2 diabetes receiving care in the specialized diabetic centers of an urban hospital [26], which is a much lower prevalence than in the current study. The difference could be explained by the fact that the European study population was recruited from highly specialized centers for diabetic care with proper management, multidisciplinary care, and follow-up, hence fewer diabetic-related cardiac complications [27].

Like the current study, previous studies reported increases in BMI to be associated with LVDD [19, 26, 28, 29]. Overweight and obesity are associated with increased plasma membrane content of fatty acids transporters such as plasma membrane-associated fatty acid-binding protein and fatty acid translocase which increases fatty acids uptake and utilization leading to cardiac steatosis [30] which induces overproduction of reactive oxygen species and ceramide causing myocardial damage [5, 31]. In addition, impairment of myocardial contractility can occur due to activation of adenosine triphosphate-dependent potassium channels leading to shortening of the action potential [5, 8, 32]. This myocardial damage is linked to the high release of cytokines from the cardiac adipocytes, enhanced by high insulin and leptin levels [10]. These provide a great opportunity to study weight reduction interventions and the use of lipid-lowering agents in individuals with diabetes who are overweight and have LVDD. Nevertheless, Muddu et al. found no association between overweight/obesity and diabetic cardiomyopathy [18]. Taken together, hypertension and increasing age among individuals with diabetes and obesity are independently associated with LVDD [33, 34]. Overweight/obesity also directly increases the risk of type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension which are primary risk factors for LVDD [8, 11].

Prior studies in Africa, Asia, and Europe similarly found advanced age was associated with LVDD [9, 18, 24, 26, 28]. This consistency could be explained by the physiological delay in relaxation of the left ventricle wall which occurs with increasing age hence abnormal diastolic function [22, 23]. However, Hassan et al., in a study in Egypt reported a null association between age and LVDD [19]. This contradicts the current study and could partially be explained by their exclusion of individuals older than 60 years and/or those with hypertension [19].

Unsurprisingly, hypertension was found to modify the association between BMI and LVDD in the current study. Several studies have reported hypertension as one of the major causes of left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction [28, 35,36,37]. Hypertension directly triggers the remodeling of cardiac walls through increases in the cardiac afterload and indirectly through the heightened activity of the renin-angiotensin system [38]. Individuals with diabetes and hypertension have higher left ventricular filling pressures which result in synergistic disastrous effects on cardiac myocytes than with either condition alone [39]. On contrary, Muddu and his colleagues didn’t find any association between hypertension and LVDD in their study [18]. Jain et al. described the associations of hypertension with LVDD to be amplified by diabetes and BMI of 30–35 kg/m2 [34].

Our study has several strengths. Though echocardiography has excellent sensitivity and specificity for the assessment of LVDD [40], it is invaluable in identifying additional findings associated with LVDD such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, primary valvular heart disease, and non-group 2 pulmonary hypertension, cardiac amyloidosis, pericardial disease, and high-output failure. However, this does not exclude LVDD misclassification. In addition, we used a rigorous and standard BMI measurement protocol. However, our results should be interpreted with the limitation of potential unmeasured confounding.

Conclusion

In this study, LVDD is prevalent and positively associated with BMI among ambulatory Ugandan adults living with diabetes mellitus for at least five years. The association was higher for older overweight/obese than younger individuals with normal weight. Future studies should focus on the effect of weight loss on LVDD as a possible target for the prevention of heart failure.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used during this study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AOR:

Adjusted odds ratio

BMI:

Body mass index

CI:

Confidence interval

CVD:

Cardiovascular disease

HbA1c:

Glycated hemoglobin

IQR:

Interquartile range

LA:

Left atrium

LDL:

Low-density lipoproteins

LVDD:

Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction

MRRH:

Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital

MUREC:

Mbarara University of Science and Technology Research and Ethics Committee

SD:

Standard deviation

SBP:

Systolic blood pressure

TR:

Tricuspid regurgitations

UACR:

Urine albumin to creatinine ratio

OR:

Odds ratio

References

  1. Martín-Timón I, et al. Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease: Have all risk factors the same strength? World J Diabet. 2014;5(4):444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou L, et al. Prevalence, incidence and risk factors of chronic heart failure in type 2 diabetic population: a systematic review. Curr Diabet Rev. 2009;5(3):171–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Aminde LN, Dzudie A, Kengne AP. Prevalent diabetes mellitus in patients with heart failure and disease determinants in sub-Saharan Africans having diabetes with heart failure: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6(2):e010097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mbanya J, Ramiaya K. Disease and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa, diabetes mellitus (online) 2006. Access 6 March 2012. 1752.

  5. Battiprolu PK, et al. Diabetic cardiomyopathy: mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Drug Discov Today Dis Mech. 2010;7(2):e135–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kasznicki J, Drzewoski J. State of the art paper heart failure in the diabetic population–pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Arch Med Sci. 2014;10(3):546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jamiel A, et al. Correlation between diastolic dysfunction and coronary artery disease on coronary computed tomography angiography. Heart Views. 2016;17(1):13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pappachan JM, et al. Diabetic cardiomyopathy: pathophysiology, diagnostic evaluation, and management. World J Diabet. 2013;4(5):177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Patil VC, et al. Diastolic dysfunction in asymptomatic type 2 diabetes mellitus with normal systolic function. J Cardiovasc Dis Res. 2011;2(4):213–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Suto M, et al. Impact of overweight on left ventricular function in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017;16(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eckel RH, et al. Obesity and type 2 diabetes: what can be unified and what needs to be individualized? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(6):1654–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Namusisi O, et al. Risk factors for non-communicable diseases in rural Uganda: a pilot surveillance project among diabetes patients at a referral hospital clinic. Pan Afr Med J. 2011;10:66.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Damian DJ, et al. Prevalence of overweight and obesity among type 2 diabetic patients attending diabetes clinics in northern Tanzania. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Voulgari C, et al. Diabetic cardiomyopathy: from the pathophysiology of the cardiac myocytes to current diagnosis and management strategies. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2010;6:883.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chobanian AV, et al. Seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42(6):1206–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bailey KV, Ferro-Luzzi A. Use of body mass index of adults in assessing individual and community nutritional status. Bull World Health Organ. 1995;73(5):673.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Nagueh SF, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2016;17(12):1321–60.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Muddu M, Mutebi E, Mondo C. Prevalence, types and factors associated with echocardiographic abnormalities among newly diagnosed diabetic patients at Mulago Hospital. Afr Health Sci. 2016;16(1):183–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hassan Ayman K, et al. Correlation between left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and dyslipidemia in asymptomatic patients with new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus. Egypt J Intern Med. 2021;33(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Landsberg L, Molitch M. Diabetes and hypertension: pathogenesis, prevention and treatment. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2004;26(7–8):621–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dodiyi-Manuel ST, et al. Left ventricular dysfunction in normotensive type II diabetic patients in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2013;9:529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Salmasi A-M, et al. Age-associated changes in left ventricular diastolic function are related to increasing left ventricular mass. Am J Hypertens. 2003;16(6):473–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pyszko J, et al. Effects of age on left ventricular diastolic function. Cor et Vasa. 2018;6:66.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ashour K. Early detection of diastolic dysfunction in diabetic patients (single center cross sectional study). J Heart Cardiovasc Res. 2018;2(1):114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Abhayaratna WP, et al. Characteristics of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in the community: an echocardiographic survey. Heart. 2006;92(9):1259–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Jørgensen PG, et al. Abnormal echocardiography in patients with type 2 diabetes and relation to symptoms and clinical characteristics. Diabet Vasc Dis Res. 2016;13(5):321–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Powell W, P., et al. New approaches to providing individualized diabetes care in the 21st century. Curr Diabet Rev. 2015;11(4):222–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Srivastava PM, et al. Prevalence and predictors of cardiac hypertrophy and dysfunction in patients with Type 2 diabetes. Clin Sci. 2008;114(4):313–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wai B, et al. Prevalence, predictors, and evolution of echocardiographically defined cardiac abnormalities in adults with type 1 diabetes: an observational cohort study. J Diabet Complic. 2014;28(1):22–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nyman K, et al. Cardiac steatosis and left ventricular function in men with metabolic syndrome. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013;15(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Park T-S, et al. Ceramide is a cardiotoxin in lipotoxic cardiomyopathy* s⃞. J Lipid Res. 2008;49(10):2101–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Liu GX, et al. Long-chain acyl-coenzyme A esters and fatty acids directly link metabolism to KATP channels in the heart. Circ Res. 2001;88(9):918–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Çil H, et al. Impact of body mass index on left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. Echocardiography. 2012;29(6):647–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Jain A, et al. Left ventricular diastolic function in hypertension and role of plasma glucose and insulin: comparison with diabetic heart. Circulation. 1996;93(7):1396–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Palmiero P, et al. Left ventricular diastolic function in hypertension: methodological considerations and clinical implications. J Clin Med Res. 2015;7(3):137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ike SO, Ikeh VO. The prevalence of diastolic dysfunction in adult hypertensive Nigerians. Ghana Med J. 2006;40(2):55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ratnaparkhe V, Bhangale A. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in primary hypertension and its relation with leisure time physical activity. J Assoc Phys India. 2015;63(7):20–4.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Georgiopoulou VV, et al. Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hypertensive heart disease. Cardiol Clin. 2010;28(4):675–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Russo C, et al. Effect of diabetes and hypertension on left ventricular diastolic function in a high-risk population without evidence of heart disease. Eur J Heart Fail. 2010;12(5):454–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Dal Canto E, et al. Diagnostic value of echocardiographic markers for diastolic dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Heart Fail Rev. 2020;66:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the study participants and all those who contributed to this work.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BAEL: conceptualized the study, edited the protocol, collected the data, analyzed the data, interpreted the results, and wrote and edited the manuscript. EN: edited protocol and contributed to the manuscript. FCA: edited protocol, did the echocardiography, and contributed to the manuscript. AAA: edited protocol and contributed to the manuscript. GM: edited protocol and contributed to the manuscript. CKM: edited protocol and contributed to the manuscript. SO: supervised, edited the protocol, analyzed the data, interpreted the results, and contributed to the manuscript. CM: supervised, edited the protocol, and contributed to the manuscript. AM: supervised, edited the protocol, and contributed to the manuscript. Co-authors SO, CM, and AM contributed equally to this research and manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boniface Amanee Elias Lumori.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Research and Ethics Committee of Mbarara University of Science and Technology (MUREC 1/7). All consents were translated into the local language and the study methods were carried out following the relevant guidelines and regulations. All individuals gave signed informed consent or provided a thumbprint in the presence of a witness for those unable to write.

Consent for publication

All co-authors reviewed and approved the manuscript for publication.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lumori, B.A.E., Nuwagira, E., Abeya, F.C. et al. Association of body mass index with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction among ambulatory individuals with diabetes mellitus in rural Uganda: a cross-sectional study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 22, 279 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02718-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02718-2

Keywords