Skip to main content
Download PDF

Platelet-to-hemoglobin ratio as a valuable predictor of long-term all-cause mortality in coronary artery disease patients with congestive heart failure

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders volume 21, Article number: 618 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The platelet-to-hemoglobin ratio (PHR) has emerged as a prognostic biomarker in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients after PCI but not clear in CAD complicated with congestive heart failure (CHF). Hence, we aimed to assess the association between PHR and long-term all-cause mortality among CAD patients with CHF.

Methods

Based on the registry at Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital in China, we analyzed data of 2599 hospitalized patients who underwent coronary angiography (CAG) and were diagnosed with CAD complicated by CHF from January 2007 to December 2018. Low PHR was defined as ˂ 1.69 (group 1) and high PHR as ≥ 1.69 (group 2). Prognosis analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier method. To assess the association between PHR and long-term all-cause mortality, a Cox-regression model was fitted.

Results

During a median follow-up of 5.2 (3.1–7.8) years, a total of 985 (37.9%) patients died. On the Kaplan–Meier analysis, patients in high PHR group had a worse prognosis than those in low PHR group (log-rank, p = 0.0011). After adjustment for confounders, high PHR was correlated with an increased risk of long-term all-cause mortality in CAD patients complicated with CHF. (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13–1.52, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Elevated PHR is correlated with an increased risk of long-term all-cause mortality in CAD patients with CHF. These results indicate that PHR may be a useful prognostic biomarker for this population. Meanwhile, it is necessary to take effective preventive measures to regulate both hemoglobin levels and platelet counts in this population.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. CAD complicated by heart failure especially carries considerable morbidity and poor prognosis [1]. Those facts indicate that it is necessary to quest useful and simple indicators to evaluate the prognosis of CAD patients complicated with congestive heart failure (CHF) for effective and timely intervention strategies.

A growing body of literature has illustrated the prognostic utility of various complete blood counts in predicting adverse outcomes in cardiovascular disease [2, 3]. High circulating platelet counts have been reported to be associated with poor outcomes in cardiovascular disease [4,5,6], the mechanism of which may be inflammatory response [7, 8] and platelet activation [9]. In contrast, low hemoglobin levels were considered as poor prognostic factors of cardiovascular disease [10, 11], owing to worsening myocardial ischemia [12], neurohormonal activation, increased cardiac output [13, 14] and adverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling [14, 15].

Platelet-to-hemoglobin ratio has emerged as a novel and readily available prognostic parameter in cardiovascular disease. Zheng et al. [16] reported that PHR was an independent predictor of adverse outcomes in CAD patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and was considered as a stronger predictor than platelet counts or hemoglobin levels alone. However, the association of PHR with all-cause mortality in CAD patients with congestive heart failure is not clear. In this context, we aimed to investigate the relationship between PHR and long-term all-cause mortality of CAD patients with CHF.

Population and methods

Data sources and study population

This is an observational cohort, single-center and retrospective study. The data we used in this study was based on the electronic clinical management records system of the Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04407936). We collected data on all-cause mortality through the Guangdong Provincial Public Security and then matched to the electronic clinical management system of the Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital records. The baseline data included demographic characteristics, medical history, laboratory test results and medication use. We included patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) and with a final diagnosis of CAD complicated by CHF in accordance with the 10th Revision Codes of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10; I20.xx–I25.xx, I50.00001, and I91.40001, Additional file 1: Table S1) from January 2007 to December 2018. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary angiography (CAG) was performed in accordance with authoritative clinical practice guidelines [17, 18]. All blood samples were collected in the early morning after overnight fasting. We excluded patients who lacked platelet counts, hemoglobin levels and follow-up information. Finally, 2599 patients were enrolled in this analysis (Fig. 1). The study population was dichotomized based on the PHR on admission according to the median. We defined PHR ˂ 1.69 as low PHR (group 1), PHR ≥ 1.69 as high PHR (group 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Patients flow diagram

Full size image

Clinical definition

CHF was defined as New York Heart Association (NYHA) class > 2 or Killip class > 1 [19]. Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was defined as having a medical history of an ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) or Non-STEMI cardiac events. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. eGFR was calculated according to the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. Hypertension (HT) and diabetes mellitus (DM) were defined following the 10th Revision Codes of the International Classification of Diseases.

Study endpoints and clinical follow-up

Long-term all-cause mortality was the primary endpoint of this study which was defined as any death recorded from the date of enrollment to the date of the last follow-up visit. Follow-up time and data on long-term all-cause mortality were obtained from the Guangdong Provincial Public Security and then matched to the electronic Clinical Management System of the Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital records.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics on baseline variables are presented as the mean (standard deviation [SD]), median (interquartile range [IQR]), or number and percentage as appropriate. Differences in baseline characteristics between groups were analyzed by Student’s t-test when appropriate. The categorical data was analyzed by Pearson chi-squared tests. Restricted cubic splines were used to investigate the associations of PHR with long-term all-cause death. Survival times were plotted using Kaplan–Meier survival curves, the log-rank test was used to compare differences in survival.

The usefulness of PHR for independently predicting long-term all-cause mortality among CAD patients with CHF was analyzed by the Cox regression models. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. Those related to mortality on the basis of clinical experience were further controlled using multivariable Cox regression in 3 different models. Model 1 was unadjusted, model 2 was adjusted for age and gender, model 3 included model 2 variables, medical history (CKD, HT, AMI, Stroke, DM, pre-acute myocardial infarction and PCI) and drugs information (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blockers, aspirin, β-blockers, clopidogrel and statins). We conducted a sensitivity analysis with categorization to quartiles groups (group 1 (0.02–1.34), group 2 (1.34–1.69), group 3 (1.69–2.15), group 4 (2.15–9.32)) in order to evaluate the trend of the association and whether there is a gradual, stepwise association. Subgroup analysis was performed among 8 prespecified subgroups (age ≥ 75 or age < 75, male or female, non-CKD or CKD, non-PCI or PCI) to assess the association of PHR with long-term all-cause mortality among CAD patients with CHF.

All P values were calculated with two-sided tests. A threshold of p-value < 0.05 was set to represent statistical significance. All data analyses were performed by R software (version 4.0.3; R Core Team, Vienna, Austria).

Results

Clinical characteristics

A total of 2599 patients were included in the study. The baseline clinical characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1. Among the whole study population, the mean age was 66.3 ± 10.9 years, and 660 (25.4%) were female. A total of 1857 (71.5%) patients underwent PCI treatment, 1290 (49.7%) patients were diagnosed as AMI, 1117 (43.0%) patients were identified as having CKD, 921 (35.5%) patients had DM. Patients in high PHR group were more likely to be female (31.3%) which were positively associated with the prevalence of AMI, DM, HT, CKD and negatively associated with admission ALB, eGFR, HGB levels. There was significantly higher use of statins, clopidogrel, aspirin and calcium channel blockers in the high PHR group. More details of the baseline characteristics of patients enrolled are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study groups
Full size table

Primary outcomes

During a median follow-up of 5.2 (3.1–7.8) years, a total of 985 (37.9%) patients died (p = 0.001; Fig. 2). Restricted cubic splines showed that HR for the primary endpoint was positively associated with PHR, but the relationship between them was nonlinear (Fig. 3). As determined by Kaplan–Meier analysis, the high PHR group had a higher incidence of long-term all-cause mortality, the statistically significant differences between KM curves were measured by the log-rank test (log-rank, p = 0.0011; Fig. 4).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Bar chart for long-term all-cause mortality of PHR

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Restricted cubic spline curve for the PHR hazard ratio

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Kaplan–Meier curves for long-term all-cause mortality of PHR

Full size image

The relationship between high PHR and long-term all-cause mortality was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models. Our results demonstrated that high PHR was associated with a higher risk of all-cause death than low PHR even after full adjustment for major confounders. (model 1: HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.09–1.40, p < 0.0001; model 2: HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.11–1.43, p < 0.0001; model 3: HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.13–1.52, p < 0.0001; Table 2). Increasing over 30% higher risk among CAD with CHF in the highest quartile compared to the lowest (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.11–1.66; Table 3). At the same time, a gradual, stepwise association was observed (P for trend < 0.05). In a subgroup analysis, the Cox regression analysis revealed that high PHR had a consistently higher relative risk of mortality among age < 75, male, non-CKD and PCI subgroups (Fig. 5).

Table 2 Cox proportional hazards model for the association between PHR and long-term all-cause mortality
Full size table
Table 3 Sensitivity analysis for relationship of PHR and long-term all-cause mortality with categorization to quartiles groups
Full size table
Fig. 5
figure 5

Forest plots of hazard ratios for the primary endpoint in different subgroups

Full size image

Discussion

This study demonstrated the association of PHR with all-cause mortality among CAD patients with CHF. Our study showed that long-term all-cause mortality of this population was approximately 40% in a median follow-up of 5.2 years and high PHR increased long-term all-cause mortality by 31% after adjusting major confounders among those patients.

CAD is often complicated by heart failure, which leads to a worse prognosis [20, 21]. Some scholars found that about 20–30% of long-term all-cause mortality in a median follow-up of ~ 2 years [22, 23], which were lower than our data. It suggested that more information about endpoints may be attained during a longer follow-up time. CAD is a common reason for HF development [24]. Either AMI or chronic ischemia leads to LV remodeling, ischemic mitral regurgitation and LV dysfunction [25, 26]. In acute heart failure syndromes, the high LV diastolic pressure and low systemic blood pressure often result in subendocardial ischemia and lead to worse outcomes [27]. CAD patients complicated by LV dysfunction carry a high risk for sudden cardiac death because of recurrent myocardial injury or the abrupt onset of ventricular arrhythmias [28, 29]. Thus, physicians need some simple indicators to evaluate the outcomes among CAD patients complicated with CHF.

The predictive value of other blood parameters, such as lymphocytes, monocytes and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, for clinical outcomes has been demonstrated in the field of cardiovascular disease [30]. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been reported to be useful markers to predict poor prognosis in CAD patients [2, 31]. It is acknowledged that CAD patients with CHF are at high risk for adverse outcomes. Recently, platelet-to-hemoglobin ratio has emerged as a novel prognostic predictor for cardiovascular disease. Zheng et al. [16] showed that PHR was an independent prognostic marker for CAD patients after PCI with better prognostic value than absolute platelet counts or hemoglobin levels. Nevertheless, evidence of the prognostic value of PHR for CAD patients with CHF is lacking. As a complement, our study indicated that PHR was significantly associated with poor outcomes among CAD patients with CHF.

The role of PHR in the deterioration of CAD with CHF remains unclear. On one hand, persistent inflammation is a hallmark of coronary artery disease and congestive heart failure [7, 8]. The release of various mediators during a proinflammatory state results in megakaryocyte proliferation and increased platelet counts in circulation [9, 32, 33], which may indicate elevated platelet activation and a prothrombotic state [34, 35]. These processes may cause thrombosis-related complications in CHF patients [4, 5]. In terms of CAD, activated platelets play a vital role in the development and progression of atherosclerosis [36], the instability of atherosclerotic plaques and thrombus formation in the case of vascular endothelium injury and plaque rupture [32, 37, 38]. On the other hand, low hemoglobin levels indicate decreased oxygen-carrying capacity, which may worsen the myocardial ischemic injury [12]. Subsequent tissue hypoxia may result in the activation of sympathetic nervous system and renin–angiotensin–aldosterone systems, which eventually result in elevated cardiac output [13, 14]. These changes may chronically lead to adverse LV remodelling [14, 15] and a vicious cycle of HF progression [25].

In addition, there is a potential mechanistic association between reduced hemoglobin and elevated platelet count. Firstly, anemia can increase whole blood aggregometry, artifactually promoting platelet aggregation. Then, the low hemoglobin often coexists with inflammation. Inflammatory biomarkers, such as fibrinogen, von Willebrand factor, and inflammatory cytokines may directly increase platelet reactivity. Moreover, due to the anemic milieu, bone marrow become hyperactivity and release more platelets subsequently [39].

Complete blood count is performed routinely upon admission and frequently repeated during hospitalization in all CAD patients. PHR is an easily calculated, readily available and reproducible biomarker with no further cost for the patient or healthcare system. CAD complicated by CHF carries considerable morbidity and poor prognosis. It is necessary to take some measures to improve the prognosis of this population, such as secondary prevention of CAD and appropriate management of congestive heart failure. As to high PHR patients, controlling the progression of inflammatory response, the administration of antiplatelet or anticoagulant medications and supplement of erythrotropin analogs or iron for improvement of anemia are essential and beneficial to postpone ventricular remodeling and improve prognosis.

Limitations

This study examined the significance of PHR on long-term all-cause death among CAD patients with CHF. There are several limitations of this study. First, information about cause-specific death was not available in this study, which restricted our ability to examine the significance of PHR with cause-specific death, such as cardiovascular disease mortality. Second, only on admission baseline platelet counts and hemoglobin levels were contained in our study. Therefore, we could not know the variation trends of platelet counts and hemoglobin levels during hospitalization and the effects of such changes. Third, although we have adjusted for many confounders in the analysis, there could be some residual confounding due to unmeasured factors. Fourth, in this study, we did not exclude patients with chronic liver disease, chronic lung disease…, which may influence hemoglobin and platelet levels.

Conclusions

High PHR is a novel, independent predictor of long-term all-cause mortality in CAD patients with CHF. It is helpful for risk stratification in CAD patients complicated by CHF to identify high-risk patients for further targeted intervention. However, prospective multi-center cohort studies are required to provide high-level of evidence and validate our findings.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

PHR:

Platelet-to-hemoglobin ratio

CAD:

Coronary artery disease

CHF:

Congestive heart failure

CAG:

Coronary angiography

PCI:

Percutaneous coronary intervention

LV:

Left ventricular

NYHA:

New York Heart Association

CKD:

Chronic kidney disease

eGFR:

Estimated glomerular filtration rate

MDRD:

Modification of diet in renal disease

AMI:

Acute myocardial infarction

STEMI:

ST-elevated myocardial infarction

DM:

Diabetes mellitus

HT:

Hypertension

References

  1. Gheorghiade M, Sopko G, De Luca L, Velazquez EJ, Parker JD, Binkley PF, Sadowski Z, Golba KS, Prior DL, Rouleau JL, et al. Navigating the crossroads of coronary artery disease and heart failure. Circulation. 2006;114(11):1202–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shah N, Parikh V, Patel N, Patel N, Badheka A, Deshmukh A, Rathod A, Lafferty J. Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio significantly improves the Framingham risk score in prediction of coronary heart disease mortality: insights from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey-III. Int J Cardiol. 2014;171(3):390–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ye GL, Chen Q, Chen X, Liu YY, Yin TT, Meng QH, Liu YC, Wei HQ, Zhou QH. The prognostic role of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with acute heart failure: a cohort study. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):10639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chung I, Lip GY. Platelets and heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(22):2623–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mehta J, Mehta P. Platelet function studies in heart disease. VI. Enhanced platelet aggregate formation activity in congestive heart failure: inhibition by sodium nitroprusside. Circulation. 1979;60(3):497–503.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Iijima R, Ndrepepa G, Mehilli J, Bruskina O, Schulz S, Schömig A, Kastrati A. Relationship between platelet count and 30-day clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions. Pooled analysis of four ISAR trials. Thromb Haemostasis. 2007;98(4):852–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ross R. Atherosclerosis—an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(2):115–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Torre-Amione G, Kapadia S, Benedict C, Oral H, Young JB, Mann DL. Proinflammatory cytokine levels in patients with depressed left ventricular ejection fraction: a report from the studies of left ventricular dysfunction (SOLVD). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27(5):1201–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Klinger MH, Jelkmann W. Role of blood platelets in infection and inflammation. J Interf Cytokine Res. 2002;22(9):913–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ezekowitz JA, McAlister FA, Armstrong PW. Anemia is common in heart failure and is associated with poor outcomes: insights from a cohort of 12 065 patients with new-onset heart failure. Circulation. 2003;107(2):223–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Reinecke H, Trey T, Wellmann J, Heidrich J, Fobker M, Wichter T, Walter M, Breithardt G, Schaefer RM. Haemoglobin-related mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. Eur Heart J. 2003;24(23):2142–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Most AS, Ruocco NA Jr, Gewirtz H. Effect of a reduction in blood viscosity on maximal myocardial oxygen delivery distal to a moderate coronary stenosis. Circulation. 1986;74(5):1085–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Anand IS, Chandrashekhar Y, Ferrari R, Poole-Wilson PA, Harris PC. Pathogenesis of oedema in chronic severe anaemia: studies of body water and sodium, renal function, haemodynamic variables, and plasma hormones. Br Heart J. 1993;70(4):357–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pereira AA, Sarnak MJ. Anemia as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Kidney Int Suppl. 2003;87:S32-39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Anand I, McMurray JJ, Whitmore J, Warren M, Pham A, McCamish MA, Burton PB. Anemia and its relationship to clinical outcome in heart failure. Circulation. 2004;110(2):149–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zheng YY, Wu TT, Chen Y, Hou XG, Yang Y, Zhang JY, Ma YT, Xie X. Platelet-to-hemoglobin ratio as a novel predictor of long-term adverse outcomes in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: a retrospective cohort study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020;27(19):2216–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jneid H, Anderson JL, Wright RS, Adams CD, Bridges CR, Casey DE Jr, Ettinger SM, Fesmire FM, Ganiats TG, Lincoff AM, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA focused update of the guideline for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2007 guideline and replacing the 2011 focused update): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2012;126(7):875–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek B, Chambers CE, Ellis SG, Guyton RA, Hollenberg SM, et al. 2015 ACC/AHA/SCAI focused update on primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: an update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary Intervention and the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(10):1235–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mehran R, Aymong ED, Nikolsky E, Lasic Z, Iakovou I, Fahy M, Mintz GS, Lansky AJ, Moses JW, Stone GW, et al. A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: development and initial validation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(7):1393–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Felker GM, Shaw LK, O’Connor CM. A standardized definition of ischemic cardiomyopathy for use in clinical research. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(2):210–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Purek L, Laule-Kilian K, Christ A, Klima T, Pfisterer ME, Perruchoud AP, Mueller C. Coronary artery disease and outcome in acute congestive heart failure. Heart (Br Cardiac Soc). 2006;92(5):598–602.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mentz RJ, Allen BD, Kwasny MJ, Konstam MA, Udelson JE, Ambrosy AP, Fought AJ, Vaduganathan M, O’Connor CM, Zannad F, et al. Influence of documented history of coronary artery disease on outcomes in patients admitted for worsening heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in the EVEREST trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2013;15(1):61–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zannad F, Anker SD, Byra WM, Cleland JGF, Fu M, Gheorghiade M, Lam CSP, Mehra MR, Neaton JD, Nessel CC, et al. Rivaroxaban in patients with heart failure, sinus rhythm, and coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(14):1332–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey DE Jr, Drazner MH, Fonarow GC, Geraci SA, Horwich T, Januzzi JL, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2013;128(16):1810–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sutton MG, Sharpe N. Left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction: pathophysiology and therapy. Circulation. 2000;101(25):2981–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Levine RA, Schwammenthal E. Ischemic mitral regurgitation on the threshold of a solution: from paradoxes to unifying concepts. Circulation. 2005;112(5):745–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Flaherty JD, Bax JJ, De Luca L, Rossi JS, Davidson CJ, Filippatos G, Liu PP, Konstam MA, Greenberg B, Mehra MR, et al. Acute heart failure syndromes in patients with coronary artery disease early assessment and treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(3):254–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pfeffer MA, McMurray JJ, Velazquez EJ, Rouleau JL, Køber L, Maggioni AP, Solomon SD, Swedberg K, Van de Werf F, White H, et al. Valsartan, captopril, or both in myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, or both. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(20):1893–906.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Koplan BA, Stevenson WG. Ventricular tachycardia and sudden cardiac death. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84(3):289–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Oylumlu M, Oylumlu M, Arik B, Demir M, Ozbek M, Arslan B, Acun B, Polat N, Akil MA, Bilik MZ. Monocyte to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lymphocyte to monocyte ratios are predictors of in-hospital and long-term mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75(5):e13973.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Qiu Z, Jiang Y, Jiang X, Yang R, Wu Y, Xu Y, Cheng X. Relationship between platelet to lymphocyte ratio and stable coronary artery disease: meta-analysis of observational studies. Angiology. 2020;71(10):909–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kurtul A, Murat SN, Yarlioglues M, Duran M, Ergun G, Acikgoz SK, Demircelik MB, Cetin M, Akyel A, Kasapkara HA, et al. Association of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio with severity and complexity of coronary artery disease in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol. 2014;114(7):972–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Alexandrakis MG, Passam FH, Moschandrea IA, Christophoridou AV, Pappa CA, Coulocheri SA, Kyriakou DS. Levels of serum cytokines and acute phase proteins in patients with essential and cancer-related thrombocytosis. Am J Clin Oncol. 2003;26(2):135–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Gary T, Pichler M, Belaj K, Hafner F, Gerger A, Froehlich H, Eller P, Rief P, Hackl G, Pilger E, et al. Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio: a novel marker for critical limb ischemia in peripheral arterial occlusive disease patients. PLOS ONE. 2013;8(7):e67688.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ozcan Cetin EH, Cetin MS, Aras D, Topaloglu S, Temizhan A, Kisacik HL, Aydogdu S. Platelet to lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic marker of in-hospital and long-term major adverse cardiovascular events in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Angiology. 2016;67(4):336–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tsiara S, Elisaf M, Jagroop IA, Mikhailidis DP. Platelets as predictors of vascular risk: is there a practical index of platelet activity? Clin Appl Thromb/Hemost. 2003;9(3):177–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Furman MI, Benoit SE, Barnard MR, Valeri CR, Borbone ML, Becker RC, Hechtman HB, Michelson AD. Increased platelet reactivity and circulating monocyte-platelet aggregates in patients with stable coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31(2):352–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Jennings LK. Mechanisms of platelet activation: need for new strategies to protect against platelet-mediated atherothrombosis. Thromb Haemost. 2009;102(2):248–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Giustino G, Kirtane AJ, Baber U, Généreux P, Witzenbichler B, Neumann FJ, Weisz G, Maehara A, Rinaldi MJ, Metzger C, et al. Impact of anemia on platelet reactivity and ischemic and bleeding risk: from the assessment of dual antiplatelet therapy with drug-eluting stents study. Am J Cardiol. 2016;117(12):1877–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to Dr. Yong Liu (Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital) for helping with the study design.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from Beijing Lisheng Cardiovascular Health Foundation and Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital Foundation (LHJJ20141751, DFJH201919) and National Science Foundation of China (81670339, 81970311), Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Provincial Science and Technology Department (2018J01405, 2019J01617). The work was not funded by any industry sponsors.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Kunming Bao, Haozhang Huang and Guoyong Huang contributed equally to this study

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiology, Longyan First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Longyan, 364000, China

    Kunming Bao, Guoyong Huang, Junjie Wang, Ying Liao, Yuxiong Pan, Weihua Chen, Jin Lu, Yanfang Yang, Kaihong Chen & Liling Chen

  2. Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, China

    Zhidong Huang & Shiqun Chen

  3. The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China

    Haozhang Huang

Authors
  1. Kunming Bao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Haozhang Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Guoyong Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Junjie Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ying Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yuxiong Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Weihua Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jin Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yanfang Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Zhidong Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Shiqun Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Kaihong Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Liling Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

KB, HH and GH performed the scientific literature search, and contributed to the figures and the writing of the manuscript. All authors participated in the data analysis and reviewed the manuscript. KC, LC and SC conceived and designed the study and wrote the manuscript. YL, JW, WC, YP, JL, YY and ZH helped in revising the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Each author contributed important intellectual content during manuscript drafting or revision and accepts accountability for the overall work by ensuring that questions pertaining to the accuracy or integrity of any portion of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shiqun Chen, Kaihong Chen or Liling Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All protocols of this study were approved by the institutional Ethics Research Committee of Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital (No. GDREC2019555H). The study was performed according to the declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent for this study was also waived by the Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital Ethics Committee.

Consent for publication

Consent for publication is not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1

. The ICD-10 codes information of diagnosis

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bao, K., Huang, H., Huang, G. et al. Platelet-to-hemoglobin ratio as a valuable predictor of long-term all-cause mortality in coronary artery disease patients with congestive heart failure. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 21, 618 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02423-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02423-6

Keywords

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2261

Contact us