Skip to main content
Download PDF

Comparison of bioelectrical body and visceral fat indices with anthropometric measures and optimal cutoffs in relation to hypertension by age and gender among Chinese adults

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders volume 21, Article number: 291 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Few studies have compared bioelectrical body and visceral fat indices with anthropometric measures, or evaluated their optimal cutoffs in relation to hypertension among Asians. We compared the efficiencies of bioelectrical indices (percentage of body fat, PBF; visceral fat area, VFA) with anthropometric measures (body mass index, BMI; waist-hip ratio, WHR) for hypertension and re-evaluated the optimal cutoffs of each index by age and gender.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional survey among 8234 adults for health examination. PBF, VFA, BMI, WHR, and data on hypertension and behaviors were collected. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and areas under curves (AUCs) were used to analyze the efficiencies of the indices for hypertension, optimal cutoffs were estimated using the Youden index.

Results

A total of 8234 individuals aged 21–91 with median age 44 (interquartile range [IQR] 33–56) years were included and 40.56% were men. The overall prevalence of hypertension was 27.47%. The studied indices were all associated with hypertension in all age-specific groups both among men and women except for WHR in 21–29 years old men and PBF in in 21–29 years old women. Among males, there were no statistical differences in powers of four indices for hypertension in all age-specific groups, except for 40–49 years, in which WHR was better than VFA. Among females, no differences were found among the indices in 30–39 and 70–79 years groups, while WHR was the best in 21–29 years group, VFA was better than PBF in 30–39 and 50–59 years groups, BMI was better than PBF and WHR in 60–69 years group. The optimal cutoffs of PBF, VFA, BMI and WHR ranged from 23.9 to 28.7%, 86.4 to 106.9cm2, 23.5 to 27.1 kg/m2, 0.92 to 0.96 across the age categories in males, and 32.8 to 36.3%, 75.9 to 130.9cm2, 21.9 to 26.4 kg/m2, 0.84 to 0.95 across the age categories in females, respectively.

Conclusions

The obesity indices’ efficiencies for hypertension varied by age and gender, and their cutoff values varied across the age categories and gender. Specific indices and cutoffs based on person’s age and gender should be used to identify individuals with hypertension.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Hypertension, with increasingly high prevalence, has imposed a huge burden on the healthcare system globally [1]. Early identification and intervention have been proven to be feasible and cost-effective for hypertension control. Obesity has been demonstrated as a modifiable risk factor for hypertension [2,3,4,5]. Various indices are used to define obesity. BMI, recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) [6], has been proven to be effective for distinguishing persons with hypertension and diabetes [7, 8]. However, BMI can only evaluate systemic obesity because it is not able to differentiate between muscle and fat mass. WHR is one of the markers of abdominal obesity and has demonstrated a stronger ability to identify cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases than BMI [9], indicating that it’s where the body fat accumulates rather than the body fat mass that relates to the above chronic diseases. PBF, which is the percentage of body fat weight relative to total body weight, has been proved more predictive for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risks than BMI [10], but it cannot identify where the body fat stores. VFA measures the fat that stores around some important internal organs, including liver, intestine, and pancreas. Very few studies to date have examined the differences between VFA and the other indices on identifying hypertension.

The associations between each obesity index and hypertension are different due to their different perspectives measuring obesity. Therefore these obesity indices show different screening powers for hypertension [11,12,13,14,15,16]. Gender differences in associations between obesity indices and hypertension were found by some studies [11, 15, 16], though the evidences were equivocal [12,13,14]. Some studies found the efficiencies of obesity indices for identifying hypertension decreasing with age [12]. The associations between each obesity index and hypertension reported from different studies were inconsistent.

The optimal cutoffs of each obesity index for hypertension assessed by studies from different countries were diverse and varied by age and gender. For instance, the optimal cutoffs for BMI for hypertension were 24.1 and 24.9 kg/m2 for males, while 25.4 and 25.0 kg/m2 for females in Malaysia and west-north China, respectively [17, 18]. Similarly, the optimal cutoffs for PBF for hypertension were also found inconsistent, 30.0% and 40.0% were for Mexican men and women, 24.0% and 34.0% were for men and women from Inner Mongolia, China [19, 20]. Furthermore, the optimal cutoffs for VFA for hypertension were 134.6cm2 for men and 91.1cm2 for women in Korea [16], however, a study in China failed to identify an optimal cutoff of VFA for hypertension [21].

Very few studies have compared bioelectrical indices with anthropometric measures in relation to hypertension among Asians and the optimal cutoffs of obesity indices for hypertension by age and gender have rarely been studied. This study aims to compare the efficiency of bioelectrical indices (PBF, VFA) with the most commonly used anthropometric measures (BMI, WHR) in terms of identifying hypertension, and re-evaluated the optimal cutoff values of each obesity index by age and gender in Chinese adults.

Methods

Study design and population

The study included the baseline data of a cohort Study on natural Population in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, a National Key R&D Program of China. The study population were selected by cluster sampling from attendees at two health examination centers in Tianjin from September 2018 to December 2019. Individuals aged 18 years or elder who voluntarily participated in the survey were included in the study. Individuals were excluded if they (1) were with cognitive impairment, hearing impairment, articulate problems, or severe mental illness that cannot complete the survey; (2) were with heart pacemakers implanted; (3) could not stand independently. The research protocol was reviewed and approved by ethical committees from Nankai University and the hospitals in which the study was conducted, and written informed consent was got from each participant.

Data collection

An investigator-administered questionnaire interview was conducted face-to-face to collect information including demographic characteristics (age, sex, ethnicity, marital status, highest education, occupation), self-reported personal and family history of hypertension (yes, no), alcohol and tobacco use history, and physical exercise (consistent, ≥ 3times/week; inconsistent, < 3times/week).

Measurement

Height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm without shoes using a calibrated stadiometer (GL-310, Seoul, Korea). Weight (0.1-kg precision) WHR, PBF, and VFA were measured by multifrequency bioelectric impedance method using the Inbody multifrequency impedance plethysmograph body composition analyzer (Inbody-770, Seoul, Korea). The participant stood barefoot on the foot electrode of the instrument in a fully vertical position with thin and light clothing, shared the weight evenly on both legs, held the hand electrode with both hands, and was prohibited from speaking during measurement. Measurement was completed after the reading was stable.

Blood pressure was measured in a sitting position for the right arm after resting for 5 to10 minutes, using blood pressure monitor (Kenz-AC OSC, Japan). Two readings were taken, 30 s apart, and a third measurement was conducted if the first two reads differed by more than 10 mmHg. The average of the two closest readings (1-mmHg precision) was used. Hypertension was defined using criteria from the 2010 Chinese guidelines for the management of hypertension [22]: systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 90 mmHg or self-reported history of diagnosed hypertension.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and MedCalc (MedCalc Software, Mariakerke, Belgium). The normally distributed continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and compared using t-test, while variables which were not normally distributed were described using median and quartile, and compared using rank-sum test. Categorical data were described as rate and proportion, and compared using Chi-square test. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationships between obesity indices and hypertension. The strength of the correlation was expressed as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Before the analysis, the obesity indices were standardized (original data subtracted the average and then divided by the standard deviation), so the ORs indicated hypertension risk increased by per standard deviation.

ROC curve analysis was used to compare the predictive validity, and AUC was also measured to examine the screening power of each obesity index, and to describe the probability that an index would correctly identify subjects with hypertension. AUC was assessed with 0.5 as no power and 1.0 as perfect power. The optimal cut-off values were measured by the Youden index, which was calculated with the sensitivity and specificity of the indices at various cut-off points. The method suggested by DeLong et al. was used to test whether the differences between AUC values were statistically significant [23]. Two-tailed P-values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

As summarized in Table 1, 8234 individuals aged 21–91 years with median age 44 (IQR 33–56) years, were included and 40.56% were men. The overall prevalence of hypertension was 27.47% and increased with age and decreased with education level. The prevalence of hypertension was higher in men (35.50%) than in women (21.31%). In a current marriage, smoking, alcohol drinking, and family history of hypertension were all positively associated with hypertension. The mean PBF, VFA, BMI and WHR were 29.71 ± 6.71%, 93.21 ± 34.35cm2, 24.12 ± 3.45 kg/m2 and 0.89 ± 0.06 respectively. The age and gender stratified mean PBF, VFA, BMI and WHR were presented in Fig. 1. Compared with women, men were characterized by a higher prevalence of hypertension, smoking, alcohol drinking, regular exercise and having higher BMI and WHR, but lower PBF (all P values < 0.01). No statistical difference of VFA was found between different genders.

Table 1 Hypertension prevalence by characteristics of the participants
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

The age and gender stratified mean PBF, VFA, BMI and WHR

Full size image

Logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between obesity indices and hypertension by gender. Both standardized crude ORs and ORs adjusted by age, marital status, ethnicity, education level, occupation, smoking, alcohol drinking, physical exercise, and family history of hypertension were calculated. For each obesity index, the crude and adjusted ORs for hypertension were significantly higher than the reference level of 1.00 in both men and women, a 1-SD increase of each index was associated with increased risk of hypertension in both genders.

Comparisons of ORs for all obesity indices based on Z-score standardization by gender were also conducted. As shown in Table 2, no significant differences of crude and adjusted ORs were found among all obesity indices both in men and women, and no significant difference of crude and adjusted ORs was found for each obesity index between different genders.

Table 2 Standardized odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of obesity indices for hypertension by gender
Full size table

Table 3 showed the optimal cut-off values, corresponding AUCs, sensitivities, specificities, and Youden indexes of each obesity index for identifying hypertension by gender. WHR and VFA presented greater AUCs than BMI and PBF (P < 0.001) both in men and women, and there was no difference between the identifying power of WHR and VFA in males and females. However, among men, PBF had larger AUC than BMI, whereas they showed no difference among women.

Table 3 Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the obesity indices for identifying subjects with hypertension by gender
Full size table

Table 4 showed the standardized ORs and 95% CIs of the four indices for hypertension by age and gender. The adjusted ORs were calculated with control of potential confounding variables, including age, ethnicity, marital status, education level, occupation, smoking, alcohol drinking, physical exercise and family history of hypertension. Among men, with the exception of adjusted WHR in 21–29 years group, the other indices were significantly correlated with hypertension risk. In women, significant differences were observed between all obesity indices and hypertension, except for PBF in 21–29 years group.

Table 4 Standardized odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of obesity indices for hypertension by age and gender
Full size table

Table 5 showed the optimal cut-off points of each obesity index for hypertension risk, corresponding AUCs, sensitivities, specificities and the Youden indexes by gender and age-specific group. Among males, there were no statistical differences in the screening powers of four indices for hypertension in all age-specific groups, except for 40–49 years, in which WHR was better than VFA (P < 0.01). Among females, no differences were found among the indices in 40–49 and 70–91 years groups, while WHR was the best in 21–29 years group (all P < 0.01), VFA was better than PBF in 30–39 and 50–59 years groups (all P < 0.01), BMI was better than PBF and WHR in 60–69 years group (all P < 0.01). In addition, the optimal cutoffs of each index varied by gender and age. In males, the optimal cutoffs of PBF ranged from 23.9 to 28.7% with the largest in 70–91 years group and the smallest in the 21–29 years group; the optimal cutoffs of VFA ranged from 86.4 to 106.9cm2, with the largest in the 60–69 years group and the smallest in the 50–59 years group; the optimal cutoffs of BMI ranged from 23.5 to 27.1 kg/m2, with the largest in 40–49 years group and the smallest in 21–29 years group; the optimal cutoffs of WHR ranged from 0.92 to 0.96, with the largest in 60–69 years group and the smallest in 30–39 and 40–49 years groups. In females, the optimal cutoffs of PBF ranged from 32.8 to 36.3% with the largest in 50–59 years group and the smallest in the 40–49 years group; the optimal cutoffs of VFA ranged from 75.9 to 130.9cm2, with the largest in the 70–91 years group and the smallest in the 21–29 years group; the optimal cutoffs of BMI ranged from 21.9 to 26.4 kg/m2, with the largest in 50–59 years group and the smallest in 21–29 years group; the optimal cutoffs of WHR ranged from 0.84 to 0.95, with the largest in 60–69 years group and the smallest in 21–29 and 30–39 years groups.

Table 5 Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the obesity indices for hypertension by age and gender
Full size table

As shown in Table 5, the AUCs of all obesity indices tested statistically significant in the logistic regression models were > 0.5 and statistically significant in all age-specific groups except for BMI in 21–29 years old women. Among men, in each age-specific groups, the obesity indices had no statistically significant differences in identifying subjects with hypertension, except for 40–49 group, in which WHR was the best. Among women, WHR had the best efficiency for hypertension in 21–29 years group, followed by VFA, while BMI was not statistically significant; in 30–39 years and 50–59 years groups, VFA was significantly more powerful than PBF; in 60–69 age group, the discrimination power of BMI was higher than both PBF and WHR.

Discussion

The current study found that though the studied obesity indices were all associated with hypertension, their efficiencies to distinguish persons of hypertension and the optimal cutoffs varied by age and gender. The results revealed that we should use different indices and cutoff values for persons with different characteristics to identify individuals with hypertension more accurately. Furthermore, it suggested that people who try to prevent hypertension by controlling their weight should choose the best indices and cutoff values based on their specific age and gender.

Studies have proven that obesity indices are strongly associated with hypertension and can be used to identify the disease [12, 24,25,26,27,28,29]. To date, the results on which index is the best for identifying hypertension are inconsistent. Dutra Maurílio et al. [25] suggested that abdominal fat was more strongly associated with hypertension than BMI in both men and women while Zhou et al. [26] found that waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) had the best efficiency in identifying hypertension in men while BMI was the best in women. These differences might be related to race, but the impact of age could not be ignored. The current study found that there were differences not only in gender but also in age regarding the ability of obesity indexes to identify hypertension. Moreover, the abilities of obesity indices to identify hypertension varied more in women than in men. The gender differences had already been proven by previous studies [24, 26, 27], but very few studies examined the age-specific differences among various obesity indices [25,26,27,28,29]. Age was not only a key risk factor for hypertension but also strongly related to obesity. Both gender and age have impact on the amount and how human body accumulates fat. Therefore, bias might occur if the influence of age was not taken into account when studying the relationship between obesity and hypertension. In addition, we found the optimal cutoff values of the studied indices for hypertension varied by not only gender but also age, the optimal cutoff values in different age-specific groups of the same gender were various. So, it is not advisable to directly judge the cutoff values without age grouping and reassessment of cutoff values for hypertension with age-grouping in other races is necessary. Our study suggested that it is crucial to use the appropriate indices and optimal cutoffs based on the individual’s specific age and gender for hypertension screening and prevention.

Dong et al. found that the AUCs of obesity indices decreased with age among both men and women [24]. Wu et al. suggested that obesity index had a stronger ability to identify hypertension in young people than in middle-aged people [12]. But we found that though the association between obesity indices and hypertension varied by age, there was no linear trend in it. Possible reasons for this result might be related to the complex etiology of hypertension, besides obesity, genetic factors, deterioration of vital organs, changes in vascular structure and function, changes in intestinal flora, and increased salt sensitivity also play important roles in the development of hypertension [30,31,32,33]. The biological mechanisms underlying the age differences of obesity indices in distinguishing persons with hypertension remain to be explored.

We found that among the four indices, VFA had the smallest AUCs in men but relative larger AUCs in women elder than 40 years, indicating that VFA was more powerful in identifying hypertension among women than among men. We speculated that the gender difference might be related to the sexually different structure of the human body. Among Asians, compared with men, women tend to store more fat in the subcutaneous tissues around the waist, hips, and thighs [34], so excess visceral fat may be more predictive of chronic disease in women than in men. In addition, we found that the VFA's advantage in identifying hypertension in women was gradually replaced by BMI with age. The reason for this change might be related to the secretion of free fatty acids and angiotensinogen, and sympathetic nervous system activation [35], which could slowly decrease the influence of visceral fat. Given the superiority of VFA in identifying females with hypertension, the mechanism of visceral fat's influence on female hypertension is worthy of further study.

As an un-invasive method, BIA works well in healthy subjects and in patients with stable water [36]. To control the measurement errors caused by fluid instability of hypertension, we asked each participant if they had chronic kidney disease (CKD) and no participant reported having CKD. In addition, we estimated glomerular filtration rate and found it was > 90 ml/min/1.73m2 for each participant, indicating all participants had normal kidney function. Third, participants were instructed to fast for ≥ 12 h and no strenuous activity before measurement the following morning. The measurement data showed that all participants has normal Extracellular Water (ECW). Though measurement errors caused by fluid instability of the study subjects could not be completely eliminated when performing BIA measurements, changes of body water caused by CKD, exercise, sweating, and drinking were excluded in the study [37].

To our knowledge, the current study was the first to compare BMI, WHR, PBF and VFA in identifying hypertension by gender and age in Asian adults of a broader range of age-specific categories, which helped to find out the age and gender-specific best index. In addition, it was the first to assess the age and gender-specific optimal cutoff values of BMI, WHR, PBF and VFA for hypertension. However, this study also had some limitations. First, designed as a cross-sectional study, it was impossible to evaluate the temporal sequence and causal relationship between obesity and hypertension. The results needed to be further proved by cohort study. Second, due to the lack of relevant information, this study had not adjusted confounding factors including dietary pattern [38] or intake of sodium [39] and potassium [40]. Third, Using BIA as the principle to estimate body fat, the estimation error could not be eliminated and it would vary with the change of body fat level. But compared with Computerized tomography (CT) and Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), BIA is relatively inexpensive, free of radiation, has very limited between observer variations and can be performed easily. Therefore it may be the most applicable method for large-scale studies [41]. Despite the limitations, the findings had public health relevance and may be valuable in developing more accurate and specific public health recommendations and preventative interventions.

Conclusions

Although PBF, VFA, BMI, and WHR were all positively correlated with hypertension, their power of identifying hypertension and the optimal cutoffs varied by age and gender. It should highlight to use age and gender specific indices and cutoff values to distinguish persons with hypertension.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

PBF:

Percentage of body fat

VFA:

Visceral fat area

BMI:

Body mass index

WHR:

Waist-hip ratio

WHtR:

Waist-to-height ratio

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

AUCs:

Areas under curves

WHO:

World Health Organization

SBP:

Systolic blood pressure

DBP:

Diastolic blood pressure

SPSS:

Statistical Package for Social Sciences

SD:

Standard deviation

OR:

Odds ratio

CI:

Confidence interval

References

  1. Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, et al. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet. 2005;365(9455):217–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17741-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Krousel-Wood MA, Muntner P, Islam T, et al. Barriers to and determinants of medication adherence in hypertension management: perspective of the cohort study of medication adherence among older adults. Med Clin North Am. 2009;93(3):753–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2009.02.007.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Mancia G. Introduction to a compendium on hypertension. Circ Res. 2015;116(6):923–4. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.305755.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang Q, Mahapatra T, Huang F, et al. Association between anthropometric measures and indicators for hypertension control among Kazakh–Chinese hypertension patients in Xinjiang, China: results from a cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(1): e170959. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170959.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen SC, Lo TC, Chang JH, et al. Variations in aging, gender, menopause, and obesity and their effects on hypertension in taiwan. Int J Hypertens. 2014;2014: 515297. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/515297.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. UNAIDS. https://www.who.int/topics/obesity/zh/. 2020. https://www.who.int/topics/obesity/zh/

  7. Gupta S, Kapoor S. Optimal cut-off values of anthropometric markers to predict hypertension in North Indian population. J Commun Health. 2012;37(2):441–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-011-9461-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nyamdorj R, Qiao Q, Lam TH, et al. BMI compared with central obesity indicators in relation to diabetes and hypertension in Asians. Obesity. 2008;16(7):1622–35. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2008.73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Myint PK, Kwok CS, Luben RN, et al. Body fat percentage, body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio as predictors of mortality and cardiovascular disease. Heart. 2014;100(20):1613–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305816.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zeng Q, Dong SY, Sun XN, et al. Percent body fat is a better predictor of cardiovascular risk factors than body mass index. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2012;45(7):591–600. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-879x2012007500059.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Jiang J, Deng S, Chen Y, et al. Comparison of visceral and body fat indices and anthropometric measures in relation to untreated hypertension by age and gender among Chinese. Int J Cardiol. 2016;219:204–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu X, Li B, Lin WQ, et al. The association between obesity indices and hypertension: Which index is the most notable indicator of hypertension in different age groups stratified by sex? Clin Exp Hypertens. 2019;41(4):373–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641963.2018.1489546.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Munaretti DB, Barbosa AR, Nunes Marucci MDF, et al. Self-rated hypertension and anthropometric indicators of body fat in elderly. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2011;57(1):25–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Leal Neto JS, Coqueiro RS, Freitas RS, et al. Anthropometric indicators of obesity as screening tools for high blood pressure in the elderly. Int J Nurs Pract. 2013;19(4):360–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gordon B, Shamiss A, Derazne E, et al. Sex differences in the association between body mass index and hypertension—a cross-sectional study in 717 812 adolescents. Pediatr Obes. 2016;11(4):317–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpo.12029.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee A, Kim YJ, Oh SW, et al. Cut-off values for visceral fat area identifying Korean adults at risk for metabolic syndrome. Korean J Fam Med. 2018;39(4):239–46. https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.17.0099.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Cheong KC, Yusoff AF, Ghazali SM, et al. Optimal BMI cut-off values for predicting diabetes, hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia in a multi-ethnic population. Public Health Nutr. 2013;16(3):453–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980012002911.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. He H, Pa L, Pan L, et al. Effect of BMI and its optimal cut-off value in identifying hypertension in Uyghur and Han Chinese: a Biethnic study from the China National Health Survey (CNHS). Int J Hypertens. 2018;2018:1508083. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1508083.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Macias N, Quezada AD, Flores M, et al. Accuracy of body fat percent and adiposity indicators cut off values to detect metabolic risk factors in a sample of Mexican adults. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:341. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-341.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Li Y, Wang H, Wang K, et al. Optimal body fat percentage cut-off values for identifying cardiovascular risk factors in Mongolian and Han adults: a population-based cross-sectional study in Inner Mongolia, China. BMJ Open. 2017;7(4): e14675. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen J, Tian ZQ, Zhang WG, et al. Relationship between visceral adipose tissue and prevalence of metabolic syndrome MS in patients with MS, and hypertension and/or diabetes. Natl Med J China. 2006;86(30):2110–3.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Liu LS. Writing Group of 2010 Chinese guidelines for the management of hypertension. 2010 Chinese guidelines for the management of hypertension. Chin J Hypert. 2011;39(7):579–615.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Delong ER, Delong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44(3):837–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dong Y, Wang Z, Chen Z, et al. Comparison of visceral, body fat indices and anthropometric measures in relation to chronic kidney disease among Chinese adults from a large scale cross-sectional study. BMC Nephrol. 2018;19(1):40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-018-0837-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Dutra MT, Reis D, Martins KG, et al. Comparative evaluation of adiposity indices as predictors of hypertension among Brazilian Adults. Int J Hypertens. 2018;2018:8396570. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8396570.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou Z, Hu D, Chen J. Association between obesity indices and blood pressure or hypertension: which index is the best? Public Health Nutr. 2009;12(8):1061–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980008003601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Deng G, Yin L, Liu W, et al. Associations of anthropometric adiposity indexes with hypertension risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis including PURE-China. Medicine. 2018;97(48): e13262. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013262.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Choi JR, Ahn SV, Kim JY, et al. Comparison of various anthropometric indices for the identification of a predictor of incident hypertension: the ARIRANG study. J Hum Hypertens. 2018;32(4):294–300. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-018-0043-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lin YA, Chen YJ, Tsao YC, et al. Relationship between obesity indices and hypertension among middle-aged and elderly populations in Taiwan: a community-based, cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(10): e31660. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. O’Rourke MF, Hashimoto J. Mechanical factors in arterial aging: a clinical perspective. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.12.050.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Dao HH, Essalihi R, Bouvet C, et al. Evolution and modulation of age-related medial elastocalcinosis: impact on large artery stiffness and isolated systolic hypertension. Cardiovasc Res. 2005;66(2):307–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.01.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kotsis V, Nilsson P, Grassi G, et al. New developments in the pathogenesis of obesity-induced hypertension. J Hypertens. 2015;33(8):1499–508. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000000645.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Acelajado MC, Oparil S. Hypertension in the elderly. Clin Geriatr Med. 2009;25(3):391–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2009.06.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Deng WW, Wang J, Liu MM, et al. Body mass index compared with abdominal obesity indicators in relation to prehypertension and hypertension in adults: the CHPSNE study. Am J Hypertens. 2013;26(1):58–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hps001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hu L, Hu G, Huang X, et al. Different adiposity indices and their associations with hypertension among Chinese population from Jiangxi province. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020;20(1):115. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01388-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Kyle UG, Bosaeus I, De Lorenzo AD, et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis-part II: utilization in clinical practice. Clin Nutr. 2004;23(6):1430–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2004.09.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Demura S, Yamaji S, Goshi F, et al. The influence of transient change of total body water on relative body fats based on three bioelectrical impedance analyses methods. Comparison between before and after exercise with sweat loss, and after drinking. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2002;42(1):38–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Demarco VG, Aroor AR, Sowers JR. The pathophysiology of hypertension in patients with obesity. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014;10(6):364–76. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2014.44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Geraldes V, Laranjo S, Rocha I. Hypothalamic ion channels in hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2018;20(2):14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-018-0814-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ekmekcioglu C, Elmadfa I, Meyer AL, et al. The role of dietary potassium in hypertension and diabetes. J Physiol Biochem. 2016;72(1):93–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13105-015-0449-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Chen Z. The origin of biological anthropology and human composition. Acta Anthropologica Sinica. 2013;32(03):264–73.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was performed in Tianjin First Central Hospital and Tianjin Union Medical Center. We sincerely thank all the study participants and the staff involved in facilitating and running the study.

Funding

This study was funded by the Chinese Key Research & Development Program (Nos. 2016YFC0900600, 2016YFC0900604) from the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Medicine, Nankai University, 94, Weijin Road, Tianjin, 300071, China

    Binbin Zhang, Yaqi Fan, Yuxue Wang, Jiangshan He, Pei Guo & Minying Zhang

  2. Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China

    Li Zhang

  3. Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin, China

    Chunjun Li

  4. Dongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China

    Mianzhi Zhang

Authors
  1. Binbin Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yaqi Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yuxue Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Li Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chunjun Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jiangshan He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Pei Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mianzhi Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Minying Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MZ has designed, supervised and oversaw the study implementation, and takes responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation. BZ conducted the analysis of the data. MZ and BZ have written the manuscript. LZ, CL and MZ organized and managed the field work. YF, YW, JH and PG participated in the investigation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minying Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study strictly followed the Declaration of Helsinki. The study design and data analyses were performed in Nankai University, while questionnaire interview and measurement of obesity indexes were performed in Tianjin First Central Hospital and Tianjin Union Medical Center. Written informed consent was got from each participant. The protocol for the research was reviewed and approved by ethical committees from Nankai University and the hospitals in which the study was conducted.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, B., Fan, Y., Wang, Y. et al. Comparison of bioelectrical body and visceral fat indices with anthropometric measures and optimal cutoffs in relation to hypertension by age and gender among Chinese adults. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 21, 291 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02100-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02100-8

Keywords

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2261

Contact us