Skip to main content

Chinese ASCVD risk equations rather than pooled cohort equations are better to identify macro- and microcirculation abnormalities

Abstract

Background

We hypothesized that discriminating the early subclinical organ damage would serve as a great opportunity for prevention against atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), low retinal vascular fractal dimension, and albuminuria are surrogates of subclinical vascular changes.

Methods

The aim of this study was to use Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE) and ASCVD risk equations derived from “Prediction for ASCVD Risk in China project (CHINA-PAR)” to observe the prevalence of macro- and microcirculation abnormalities. A total of 2166 subjects were involved. Characteristics were investigated using questionnaire and physical examinations. We calculated the urine albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR). The baPWV was measured using a fully automatic arteriosclerosis detector. The retinal vascular fractal dimension was measured by a semiautomated computer-based program. The 10-year ASCVD risk was estimated using the PCE and CHINA-PAR model.

Results

The cut-off values for the elevated baPWV were 2.82 and 2.92% in the PCE model and CHINA-PAR model, respectively, with nearly 85% sensitivity and an average specificity of 74%. For low retinal fractal dimension, at the cut-off point of 3.8%, we acquired an acceptable sensitivity of 66.27–68.24% and specificity of 62.57–67.45%. All the C-statistics presented a significant improvement from the PCE model to the CHINA-PAR model (P < 0.05). For all categories—net reclassification improvement (NRI) values were significant and clearly varied (0.329, 0.183, and 0.104, respectively) depending on the cut-off set at 3%.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated that the CHINA-PAR equations rather than PCE could provide better identification of macro- and microcirculation abnormalities. A lower cut-off point for the subclinical vascular changes may be selected in a population from southeast China.

Peer Review reports

Background

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) produces severe health and economic burden in China and globally [1, 2]. There were an estimated 93.8 million cases of CVD overall during 2016 in China, which is more than twice the cases that were reported in 1990 [1]. For better prevention of CVD and individualized therapy, several risk factors have been established. In 2013, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association developed the Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE) to estimate the 10-year risk of developing a first hard atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) event (defined as the first occurrence of nonfatal myocardial infarction, coronary heart disease, death, or stroke) [3]. Due to ethnic differences, estimated risks may be over-estimated in Asian-American populations in the PCE model. A new tool to conduct ASCVD risk prediction called the Prediction for ASCVD Risk in China project (CHINA-PAR) was subsequently developed in 2016 [4]. The CHINA-PAR equations are based on traditional major risk factors with several new variables, validated by 4 Chinese cohorts, and aimed to serve as valuable predictor of ASCVD risk in the general Chinese population. However, studies have shown controversial results with the CHINA-PAR model. It outperformed PCE in ASCVD risk prediction in a rural northern Chinese population [5] but underestimated the risk in Mongolians [6]. Thus, further validation of ASCVD risk predictions in other Chinese populations needs to be performed.

ASCVD has a latency of many years and produces multiple subclinical manifestations during its progression. Therefore, we hypothesized that discriminating the early macro- and microvascular subclinical organ damage would provide a great opportunity to develop preventative interventions. In the macro-circulation, the measurement of arterial stiffness parameters was performed by brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) to predict the risk of future CV events and total mortality, which is recommended by the guidelines for the management of hypertension in Japan [7]. In the microcirculation, low retinal vascular fractal dimension indicates reduced complexity in the branching pattern of the microvasculature, independent of stroke risk factors [8], and albuminuria is associated with retinopathy, stroke, heart failure, and atherosclerosis [9,10,11,12].

Although these methods for early organ damage above are noninvasive, the technical complexity and time consumption may reduce the detection rate. Therefore, we aimed to use the ASCVD risk scores to observe the prevalence of macro- and microcirculation abnormalities in a Chinese population, achieving a more valuable equation by comparing the PCE and CHINA-PAR models.

Methods

Subjects

Our study was based on a cross-sectional study of hypertension conducted from July 2011 to November 2011. A total of 7 coastal villages in Fujian Province were randomly selected in cluster sampling. Voluntary participants aged 30 years or more living in the above selected areas for more than 5 years were enrolled. Subjects without complete data or qualified fundus photographs were excluded. We also excluded subjects previously diagnosed with ASCVD (including myocardial infarction, coronary heart disease and stroke) or with a suspicion of active inflammatory disease. Two thousand one hundred sixty-six subjects were involved finally (Fig. 1). This study was performed according to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Fujian Provincial Hospital. A written informed consent was obtained from all individuals.

Fig. 1
figure1

Flowchart of the study population. ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

Data collection

Questionnaires were administered to collect following variables: age, smoking habits, alcohol consumption, medical history (including hypertension, diabetes, myocardial infarction, cardiomyopathy, congenital heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, congestive heart failure, stroke, acute and chronic inflammatory diseases, malignancy, and hematological disorders), and medications. Participants underwent physical examinations to measure height, weight, waist circumference, hip circumference, and blood pressure. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as the weight (kg)/height2 (m2). Fasting blood samples were collected for laboratory testing including total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and serum creatinine. Urinary creatinine and albumin were measured from the morning urine sample. We calculated estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation [13]. The urine albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) was defined as the ratio of urine albumin to urine creatinine [14]. The subjects who had been diagnosed or already took related medication were defined as hypertensive [15]. Participants with a clear history, or were currently taking anti-diabetic medications, or with an HbA1c ≥6.5% were defined as diabetic [16].

Measurement of baPWV

After resting for more than 10 min, the baPWV was measured using a fully automatic arteriosclerosis detector (Colin VP-1000 device; Colin Medical Technology Company, Komaki, Japan) by two professionals. We selected the right baPWV for analysis. The inter- and intra-observer variability coefficients were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.92–0.93) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98–0.99), respectively.

Retinal fractal dimension

For documentation of non-mydriatic fundus photographs, two ophthalmologists used digital cameras (Topcon NW-8, TOPCON CORPORATION, Tokyo, Japan, and Nikon D90, Tokyo, Japan) centering on the optic disk with a capturing range of 45°. A semiautomated computer-based program (Singapore I Vessel Assessment version 3.0 software, jointly developed by Singapore National University and Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore) was used to measure retinal vascular fractal dimension in the range of 0.5–2 DD from the disc margin. In a random sample of 100 fundus photographs, we found no differences between intra-grader measurements. The intergrader correlation coefficient for Df was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.89–0.90).

Assessment of ASCVD risk

The 10-year ASCVD risk was estimated using the PCE model recommended by the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) [3] and the CHINA-PAR model produced based on a Chinese population [4], respectively. The basic equation is \( 1-{{\mathrm{S}}_{10}}^{{\mathrm{e}}^{\left({\mathrm{IndX}}^{\prime}\mathrm{B}-{\mathrm{MeanX}}^{\prime}\mathrm{B}\right)}} \), in which S10 means baseline survival, lndX’B is calculated by sum of “Coeffcient × Value”, and MeanX’B stands for mean of “Coeffcient × Value” (details showed in Supplemental Table 1). The PCE included gender, age, race, diagnosis of diabetes, smoking, treated hypertension, systolic blood pressure, and lipid profile values (TC and HDL-C) as variables. The CHINA-PAR equations contained the major risk factors adopted in the PCE and additional variables including waist circumference, geographic region (northern vs. southern), urbanization (urban vs. rural), and family history of ASCVD.

Definition of macro- and microcirculation abnormalities

The cut-off value for the normal and increased baPWV was 1400 cm/s [17]. The lowest quartile of the retinal vascular fractal dimension was defined as a low fractal dimension. Albuminuria was defined as UACR ≥30 mg/g [14].

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted using R version 3.5.3 and MedCalc® statistical software, and a P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Normally distributed continuous data are given as means ± SDs, skewed distributed continuous data are reported as median (25th, 75th percentiles), categorical variables are presented as the percentage of patients. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were applied to evaluate macro- and microcirculation abnormalities. Cut-off points were determined according to the Youden index with the best-combined sensitivity and specificity. Prognostic comparisons between models were done using Harrell’s concordance C-statistic. We explored categorical net reclassification improvement (NRI) to evaluate the stratification of effects from the PCE model to the CHINA-PAR model at the cut-off point derived from the ROC.

Results

Table 1 shows characteristics of the study population. A total of 2166 individuals were enrolled in this study, with an average age of 51.91 ± 11.91 years and 37.4% men. The median UACR was 10.17 mg/g (interquartile range 4.13–22.98 mg/g). The mean retinal fractal dimension was 1.37 ± 0.05. The median baPWV for all subjects was 1346 cm/s, with an interquartile range of 1170–1600 cm/s. The prevalence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, and drinking were 23.6, 8.5, 19.1, and 15.7%, respectively.

Table 1 Characteristics of study population

Cut-off values, sensitivity, and specificity with the highest Youden index are shown in Table 2. The cut-off values for the elevated baPWV were 2.82 and 2.92% in the PCE model and the CHINA-PAR model, respectively, with nearly 85% sensitivity and an average specificity of 74%. For the low retinal fractal dimension, at the cut-off point of 3.8%, we achieved an acceptable sensitivity of 66.27–68.24% and specificity of 62.57–67.45%. However, for albuminuria, neither the PCE model nor the CHINA-PAR model would achieve sensitivity higher than 61.14%. In this case, we set a new cut-off point at 3% for the high-risk category (PCE and CHINA-PAR models) for reclassification.

Table 2 Highest Youden index of macro- and microcirculation abnormalities and corresponding cut-off, sensitivity, and specificity

The area under the ROC curve calculated for discriminating elevated baPWV was 0.86 for PCE (95% CI: 0.84–0.87) and 0.88 for CHINA-PAR (95% CI: 0.87–0.90). To distinguish the low fractal dimension, the C-statistics were 0.71 (95% CI: 0.69–0.73) for PCE and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.70–0.74) for CHINA-PAR. The C-statistics to detect albuminuria were 0.59 (95% CI: 0.57–0.61) for PCE and 0.61 (95% CI: 0.59–0.63) for CHINA-PAR. All the C-statistics presented a significant improvement from the PCE model to the CHINA-PAR model (P < 0.05). All categorical-NRI values were significant and varied across groups (0.329, 0.183, and 0.104, respectively) depending on the cut-off set at 3%. (Table 3 and Fig. 2).

Table 3 Comparisons of PCE and CHINA-PAR with a difference in AUC and NRI for prediction of macro- and microcirculation abnormalities
Fig. 2
figure2

Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) for PCE and CHINA-PAR of macro- and microcirculation abnormalities. a ROC of elevated brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV); b ROC of low fractal dimension; c ROC of albuminuria. PCE, pooled cohort equation recommended by the 2013 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association guidelines; CHINA-PAR, equations for 10-year ASCVD risk prediction in Chinese populations

Discussion

To our knowledge, our study is the first to validate the incremental value of CHINA-PAR equations against PCE for discriminating macro- and microcirculation abnormalities.

In this cross-sectional study, we assessed the performance of the PCE and CHINA-PAR models for macro- and microcirculation abnormalities in a southern Chinese rural population.

Our results showed that both models showed acceptable discrimination of elevated baPWV and low retinal vascular fractal dimension. Compared to PCE, CHINA-PAR equations showed a significant improvement in the prevalence stratification of macro- and microcirculation abnormalities represented by elevated baPWV, low retinal vascular fractal dimension, and UACR. After resetting the cut-off for the high-risk group at 3%, the prevalence of the reclassification was significantly better in the CHINA-PAR equations than in the PCE.

Subclinical vascular changes both in macro- and microcirculation would progress in ASCVD.

As a representative marker of macro-circulation, arterial stiffness measured with the baPWV has the ability to predict future CV events and total mortality [7]. Although ageing exerts a strong influence on the baPWV [18], the reference values for the baPWV and Asian evidence showed 1400 cm/s is an appropriate cut-off [17, 19]. From the microcirculation perspective, retinal microvasculopathy may reflect small vessel disease. The lower fractal dimension which reflects a sparser retinal microvascular network is associated with stroke, Alzheimer’s disease, and more diffuse and severe coronary artery disease [20,21,22,23]. As demonstrated, albuminuria is significantly and independently associated with the presence and severity of atherosclerosis [12]. Therefore, we considered elevated baPWV, lower fractal dimension, and albuminuria proxies of macro- and microcirculation abnormalities.

Matthew et al. indicated that the PCE risk score provided a better estimate of racial differences in vascular function and structure than the Framingham risk score did [24]. Few former studies have assessed the association of ASCVD risk by CHINA-PAR equations with subclinical vascular changes. It may help to identify Chinese individuals at earlier time points who could benefit from early commencement or strengthening of medical treatment. The finding in the current study supports that the CHINA-PAR equations provides utility in identifying patients with elevated baPWV and low fractal dimension, in addition to a significantly improved risk assessment of all the macro- and microcirculation abnormalities as compared to PCE.

Since the CHINA-PAR equations were developed in 2016, the validations in real practice mostly focused on the northern population [5, 6]. To date, an approximately 6-fold difference in the total burden of CVD persists among provinces [1]; therefore, geographical strategies are needed to identify ASCVD throughout China in specific provinces. Our study proposed a lower cut-off point at 3% to classify individuals at high-risk for macro- and microcirculation abnormalities. The discrepancy may be attributed to the lowest rates for ASCVD in China being in the Fujian province and their dietary difference with a higher intake of proteins, unsaturated fatty acids, magnesium, zinc, and calcium. Our study also underscored that it is crucial to pay attention to those who belong to the low-risk group but as a result of the reclassification by the adjusted cut-off point, were then reclassified as high-risk, and therefore require more intense therapy.

Strengths of our study include three parameters to indicate subclinical vascular changes. We used the C-statistic and NRI to access and compare the effects of models. Our study also has a few limitations. The cross-sectional nature of the study would not clarify the causal relationship; therefore, a larger cohort in the future is required. A few subjects were not enrolled in the study because of noncompliance, leading to a possible selection bias. The use of a questionnaire is another limitation, which may cause recall bias. In addition, our results may not be generalized to other ethnicities, because the study was only validated in Chinese residents.

Conclusion

Overall, our study demonstrated that the CHINA-PAR equations rather than PCE could provide better identification of macro- and microcirculation abnormalities. A lower cut-off point for subclinical vascular changes may be selected in a population from southeast China.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to the fact that the study is still followed up but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CVD:

Cardiovascular disease

PCE:

Pooled cohort equations

ASCVD:

Atherosclerotic CVD

CHINA-PAR:

Prediction for ASCVD risk in China project

baPWV:

Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity

TC:

Total cholesterol

HDL-C:

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol

LDL-C:

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

HbA1c:

Glycosylated hemoglobin

BMI:

Body mass index

UACR:

Urine albumin to creatinine ratio

eGFR:

The estimated glomerular filtration rate

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

NRI:

Net reclassification improvement

References

  1. 1.

    Shiwei L, Yichong L, Xinying Z, Haidong W, Peng Y, Lijun W, et al. Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases in China, 1990-2016: findings from the 2016 global burden of disease study. JAMA Cardiol. 2019, 4:342–52.

  2. 2.

    Benjamin EJ, Muntner P, Alonso A, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, Carson AP, et al. Heart Disease and stroke statistics—2019 update. Circulation. 2019;139:e56–e528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Goff DC, Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G, Coady S, D’agostino RB, Gibbons R, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force On Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(25 Part B):2935–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Yang X, Li J, Hu D, Chen J, Li Y, Huang J, Liu X, Liu F, Cao J, Shen C. Predicting the 10-year risks of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in Chinese population: the China-PAR project (prediction for ASCVD risk in China). Circulation. 2016;134(19):1430–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Tang X, Zhang D, He L, Wu N, Si Y, Cao Y, et al. Performance of atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk prediction models in a rural northern Chinese population: results from the Fangshan cohort study. Am Heart J. 2019;211:34–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Zeng NM, Zheng XW, Peng H, Jiao Y, Li HM, Zhang MZ, Wang AL, Zhang YH. Validation of the China-PAR equations for cardio-cerebrovascular risk prediction in the inner Mongolian population. Biomed Environ Sci. 2018;31(6):463–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Sugawara J, Tanaka H. Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity: myths, misconceptions, and realities. Pulse (Basel). 2015;3(2):106–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kawasaki R, Che Azemin MZ, Kumar DK, Tan AG, Liew G, Wong TY, Mitchell P, Wang JJ. Fractal dimension of the retinal vasculature and risk of stroke: a nested case-control study. Neurology. 2011;76(20):1766–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Shah SJ, Lam CSP, Svedlund S, Saraste A, Hage C, Tan RS, et al. Prevalence and correlates of coronary microvascular dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: PROMIS-HFpEF. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(37):3439–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Cheng YH, Cheng HS, Tarng DC. More impact of microalbuminuria on retinopathy than moderately reduced GFR among type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(4):803–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Aguilar MI, O’Meara ES, Seliger S, Longstreth WT, Hart RG, Pergola PE, et al. Albuminuria and the risk of incident stroke and stroke types in older adults. Neurology. 2010;75(15):1343–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Furtner M, Kiechl S, Mair A, Seppi K, Weger S, Oberhollenzer F, Poewe W, Willeit J. Urinary albumin excretion is independently associated with carotid and femoral artery atherosclerosis in the general population. Eur Heart J. 2005;26(3):279–87.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF, Feldman HI, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(9):604–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kidney Disease. Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group. KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int Suppl. 2013;3:1–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, et al. Seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42(6):1206–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Sonne DP, Hemmingsen B. Comment on American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical Care in Diabetes—2017. Diabetes care 2017; 40 (Suppl. 1): S1–S135. Diabetes Care 2017;40(7):e92-e93.

  17. 17.

    Yamashina A, Tomiyama H, Arai T, Hirose K, Koji Y, Hirayama Y, Yamamoto Y, Hori S. Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity as a marker of atherosclerotic vascular damage and cardiovascular risk. Hypertens Res. 2003;26(8):615–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ciccone MM, Bilianou E, Balbarini A, Gesualdo M, Ghiadoni L, Metra M, et al. Task force on: 'Early markers of atherosclerosis: influence of age and sex'. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2013;14(10):757–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Reference Values for Arterial Stiffness Collaboration. Determinants of pulse wave velocity in healthy people and in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors: 'establishing normal and reference values'. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(19):2338–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kipli K, Hoque ME, Lim LT, Mahmood MH, Sahari SK, Sapawi R, Rajaee N, Jpseph A. A review on the extraction of quantitative retinal microvascular image feature. Comput Math Methods Med. 2018;2018:1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Cheung CY, Ong YT, Ikram MK, Ong SY, Li X, Hilal S, et al. Microvascular network alterations in the retina of patients with Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer Dement. 2014;10(2):135–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Wang SB, Mitchell P, Liew G, Wong TY, Phan K, Thiagalingam A, Joachim N, Burlutsky G. A spectrum of retinal vasculature measures and coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis. 2018;268:215–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Liew G, Mitchell P, Rochtchina E, Wong TY, Hsu W, Lee ML, Wainwright A, Wang JJ. Fractal analysis of retinal microvasculature and coronary heart disease mortality. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(4):422–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Topel ML, Shen J, Morris AA, Al Mheid I, Sher S, Dunbar SB, et al. Comparisons of the Framingham and pooled cohort equation risk scores for detecting subclinical vascular Disease in blacks versus whites. Am J Cardiol. 2018;121(5):564–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The study was supported by Startup Fund for Scientific Research from Fujian Medical University (grant number: 2016QH122). The funding body had no role in study design, data collection and analysis and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

QW Li analyzed and interpreted the participant data as a major contributor in writing the manuscript. F Lin has been involved in drafting the manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content. ZH Gao was responsible for the fundus photography and analysis of retinal vessel parameters. F Huang have made contributions to the design and execution of the work, and she was in charge of acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data. PL Zhu made substantial contributions to conception and design. He is responsible for the whole study. Each author has participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Feng Huang or Pengli Zhu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was performed according to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Fujian Provincial Hospital. A written informed consent was obtained from all individuals.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Supplemental Table 1

. comparison of CHINA-PAR and PCE models

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Q., Lin, F., Gao, Z. et al. Chinese ASCVD risk equations rather than pooled cohort equations are better to identify macro- and microcirculation abnormalities. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 20, 145 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01425-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • ASCVD
  • Macrocirculation
  • Microcirculation