Skip to main content
Download PDF

Next-generation sequencing using microfluidic PCR enrichment for molecular autopsy

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders volume 19, Article number: 174 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

We aimed to determine the mutation yield and clinical applicability of “molecular autopsy” following sudden arrhythmic death syndrome (SADS) by validating and utilizing low-cost high-throughput technologies: Fluidigm Access Array PCR-enrichment with Illumina HiSeq 2000 next generation sequencing (NGS).

Methods

We validated and optimized the NGS platform with a subset of 46 patients by comparison with Sanger sequencing of coding exons of major arrhythmia risk-genes (KCNQ1, KCNH2, SCN5A, KCNE1, KCNE2, RYR2). A combined large multi-ethnic international SADS cohort was sequenced utilizing the NGS platform to determine overall molecular yield; rare variants identified by NGS were subsequently reconfirmed by Sanger sequencing.

Results

The NGS platform demonstrated 100% sensitivity for pathogenic variants as well as 87.20% sensitivity and 99.99% specificity for all substitutions (optimization subset, n = 46). The positive predictive value (PPV) for NGS for rare substitutions was 16.0% (27 confirmed rare variants of 169 positive NGS calls in 151 additional cases). The overall molecular yield in 197 multi-ethnic SADS cases (mean age 22.6 ± 14.4 years, 68% male) was 5.1% (95% confidence interval 2.0–8.1%), representing 10 cases carrying pathogenic or likely pathogenic risk-mutations.

Conclusions

Molecular autopsy with Fluidigm Access Array and Illumina HiSeq NGS utilizing a selected panel of LQTS/BrS and CPVT risk-genes offers moderate diagnostic yield, albeit requiring confirmatory Sanger-sequencing of mutational variants.

Peer Review reports

Background

Premature unexpected and unexplained sudden cardiac deaths (SCD) with normal autopsy and toxicology are referred to as sudden arrhythmic death syndrome (SADS) [1, 2], which affects between 0.24 and 0.81 per 100,000 young adults per year in Europe [3]. Contemporaneous epidemiological studies of young SCD (under age 35 years) identify SADS as the commonest certifiable cause in western populations, constituting up to 40% in some series [3,4,5], although the estimated incidence of SADS is dependent on study design and autopsy protocol [6]. Inherited cardiac ion channel disease, such as the long QT syndrome (LQTS) and Brugada syndrome (BrS) can be identified in up to half of the families of SADS cases [1, 7]. This diagnostic yield of cardiological evaluation, while clinically important in identifying surviving family at risk is limited by incomplete penetrance [7]. Genetic mutation analysis on post-mortem DNA, known as the molecular autopsy, has the potential to identify disease-associated (pathogenic) mutations responsible for SADS, regardless of expressivity; this approach is recommended if provided with appropriate genetic counseling for blood relatives [6, 8].

A yield of 19–26% mutations in LQTS, BrS and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) risk-genes has been established by 2 large molecular autopsy SADS series from USA [9, 10]; population-based Australasian studies identified yields of up to 27% using exome-based methodology which included analysis of less common arrhythmia and cardiomyopathy-risk genes [4, 11]. Use of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue for DNA extraction and limited candidate gene panels have reduced yields in other series [3].

Despite a class IIa recommendation [2, 12], molecular autopsy is infrequently utilized, with monetary cost given as one of the main reasons for failing to do so [13]. Next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies may offer inexpensive methods to overcome financial limitations. Multiplexed PCR-based candidate gene enrichment seen in the Access Array (Fluidigm Corporation, San Francisco) may be appropriate for the moderate genetic target size recommended for molecular autopsy following SADS [14]. This can be coupled with NGS by the HiSeq 2000 (Illumina Inc., San Diego) to provide a low-cost high-throughput candidate gene NGS platform.

We aimed to quantify the diagnostic yield of molecular autopsy identified by this NGS (Fluidigm/Illumina) platform in major candidate risk-genes implicated in LQTS, BrS and CPVT in a cohort of international and multi-ethnic SADS cases. The NGS platform was validated on a population-based Caucasian subset of British SADS cases. We evaluated our NGS platform’s future clinical utility for investigation of SADS.

Methods

Study setting

We included cases from two cohorts (British Optimization Cohort and International Cohort) which fulfilled the definition of SADS: SCD aged 1–64 years; no ante-mortem cardiac history; last seen alive and well within 24 h of being found dead; no identified cause of death on toxicological analysis and comprehensive coronial and cardiac autopsy [1, 7, 15]. Demographic characteristics, symptoms, medical and family history of SADS cases were ascertained by direct contact with next of kin where consent was given, and from coroners’ and pathologists’ reports.

Study cohorts

British SADS optimization cohort

Consecutive unexpected Caucasian SCD cases requiring coronial autopsy (n = 115) were referred by coroners over 12 months, as part of a previously reported national study (1998 to 1999) [15]. Expert panel confirmed SADS in 56 cases; 46 (82.1%) cases had suitable DNA for inclusion extracted from frozen blood. Whole-genome amplification of DNA with commercial kits was utilized prior to sequencing. Conventional mutation detection with Sanger sequencing and NGS with Fluidigm/Illumina were performed in parallel to optimize the NGS platform on this cohort.

International SADS cohort

Unrelated SADS cases (n = 174) where frozen blood and/or tissue was available were included; no cases with DNA extracted from neonatal blood spot were included. Suitable DNA was extracted from 151 (86.8%) included cases. This multi-ethnic international cohort was recruited from: population-based coronial series (Cardiac Inherited Disease Registry, Auckland, New Zealand 2000–2009 [11, 16], n = 63; SCD Registry, Denmark 2000–2006 [5], n = 26); consecutive referrals for autopsy (Royal Brompton Hospital, London 2007–2011, n = 19; Sheffield Children’s Hospital 1985–2001, n = 19); and consecutive referrals for familial cardiac evaluation (St George’s or Lewisham Hospitals, London 2009–2011, n = 28; Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam 1995–2011 [17], n = 19). Eleven previously published cases from the New Zealand cohort were diagnosed with LQTS on the basis of variants in LQTS risk-genes following molecular autopsy with Sanger sequencing [11, 16]. Nine of these cases were not included in the analysis (including RYR2 mutation analysis), while two were included as positive controls. This cohort underwent NGS with the Fluidigm/Illumina platform as described below; indels and structural variants were not evaluated.

Genetic mutation analysis

The arrhythmia panel consisted of coding exons and intron/exon boundaries of risk-genes for development of LQTS, BrS and CPVT [18,19,20]: KCNQ1, KCNH2, SCN5A, KCNE1, KCNE2 and RYR2.

Conventional mutation detection with sanger sequencing

Sequence-specific oligonucleotide primers amplified all LQTS and BrS risk-genes (KCNQ1, KCNH2, SCN5A, KCNE1, KCNE2) targets before direct sequencing (ABI3730 sequencer, Life Technologies, California). For the CPVT risk-gene RYR2, we individually screened 37 prioritized exons (7–9, 13–16, 43–50, 82–84, 87–105) with single strand conformational analysis (SSCA); amplicons demonstrating abnormal conformation were subsequently sequenced selectively with an ABI3730 sequencer (Life Technologies).

Next generation sequencing with Fluidigm / Illumina

Custom-designed primer pairs to target all candidate gene exons and splice-sites (including RYR2) were designed and optimized for the Fluidigm Access Array [21]. Manufacturer’s protocols (Fluidigm 48.480) were followed to amplify genomic DNA in up to 10-plex PCR reaction wells; subsequently, barcode indexes and sequencing adaptors were added by further PCR. Pooled amplicons were harvested and diluted to prepare unidirectional libraries for 150 base-pair (bp) paired-end sequencing on Illumina HiSeq 2000. Illumina NGS reads were trimmed for base Phred quality control (mean quality in a 30 bp sliding window > 20 and 3′ base quality ≥6) and aligned with BWA (v0.6.1-r112-master) on hg19 human genome reference sequence. Variant-calling was performed using GATK v1.5 (Genome Analysis Toolkit, Broad Institute, Cambridge, USA) [22] without downsampling or removal of PCR duplicates; variants with quality/depth < 5 or depth < 30 were filtered. Identified rare missense exonic or splice-site substitutions were confirmed by conventional PCR amplification and ABI3730 sequencing.

Analysis of rare genetic variation

Variants were considered rare if non-synonymous or affecting splice sites (±5 bp intron/exon boundary) and demonstrated allele frequency < 0.5% in the ExAC [23] and GO-ESP multiethnic exome databases [24], as identified from the ExAC Browser [25] and The Exome Variant Server [24] respectively. Variants were named according to HGVS recommendations; correct naming was confirmed by use of Mutalyzer [26, 27]. All rare variants were submitted to the in silico predictions servers: PolyPhen [28], SIFT, [29, 30] MutationTaster [31, 32] and MutationAssessor [33] for interpretation. Additionally, classifications were extracted from ClinVar [34]. Conservation was assessed by BLAST and CLUSTAL OMEGA. Finally, rare variants were classified as “pathogenic”, “likely pathogenic”, “benign”, “likely benign” or “uncertain significance” in line with current American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) guidelines [35]; rare variants were considered disease-associated mutations if classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic.

Optimization of NGS

NGS (Fluidigm / Illumina) was compared to the “gold-standard” of conventional PCR and Sanger sequencing, based on LQTS and BrS risk-gene (KCNQ1, KCNH2, SCN5A, KCNE1, KCNE2) common and rare variation identified in the British SADS Optimization Cohort. This represents the entirety of the population-based UK series of SADS cases. RYR2 data was not included due to SSCA use and incomplete exon coverage.

Statistics

Data are expressed as means and standard deviation. Normal approximation interval provides 95% confidence interval CI for yield. Comparison of proportions and means are made with Fisher’s exact and t-test respectively, with p < 0.05 considered significant.

Results

A total of 197 SADS cases (mean age 22.6 ± 14.4 years, 68% male) were analyzed by combining the British and International cohorts (Fig. 1). There was no difference in proportion of exertional deaths between gender groups or age cohort (p = 0.07 and p = 1.00 respectively; Fig. 2). Twenty-six different rare variants were identified in 29 cases (Table 1). Two individuals were double heterozygotes, while one rare variant was identified in six unrelated individuals (see Ethnic Variant Analysis below). Detailed variant assessment for ACMG classification of pathogenicity is provided as Additional file 1. A summary of demographic characteristics of carriers of disease-associated mutations is given in Fig. 3.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Age Distribution of SADS Cases. Histograms demonstrating bimodal age (years) distribution of all SADS cases included, plotted by gender ([a] Male and [b] Female). Mean ages indicated by vertical dotted gold lines

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Circumstances of Death amongst SADS Cases. Pie charts demonstrating activity and circumstances at time of death plotted by [a] gender and [b] age group (children are aged under 18 years)

Full size image
Table 1 Rare Variants identified in SADS Cases
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Mutation Carriers amongst SADS cases. Bar charts demonstrating pathogenic and likely pathogenic mutation carriers plotted by [a] gender and [b] age group (children are aged under 18 years). Abbreviations: BrS = Brugada syndrome; CPVT = catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia; LQTS = long QT syndrome

Full size image

British SADS optimization cohort

Mean age of the 46 SADS cases was 32.9 ± 14.4 years, comprising 59% males and 28 (61%) non-exertional deaths. Five (11%) families received a clinical diagnosis of genetic disease, as previously reported [1, 15]. Four rare exonic missense variants were identified in four cases; two were disease-associated mutations (variants C and V in Table 1). None of the five cases whose families were diagnosed with inherited heart disease were found to carry any rare variants in the genes sequenced [1, 15]. Clinical diagnostic yield of a disease-related mutation was identified in 4.3% (n = 2/46; 95% CI 0.0–10.2%).

Performance of NGS platform

All samples in the Optimization Cohort had greater than 95% coverage at depth of 10x of the 27049 bp target (KCNQ1, KCNH2, SCN5A, KCNE1, KCNE2, total 171 amplicons). Mean depth was 3382 reads. Sensitivity for any base change (synonymous or non-synonymous substitution or splice-site variant) for the regions that could be assessed was 87.20% (39 unique variants identified by Sanger sequencing within the target); five amplicons failed amplification. Specificity was 99.99%. Importantly, NGS demonstrated 100% sensitivity for the rare missense variants (n = 4). The International Cohort identified the PPV for correctly identifying any rare variation by NGS was 16.0% (27 true positive confirmed by Sanger sequencing of 169 positive calls by NGS platform).

Ethnic variants

Six New Zealand cases carried the splice-site variant of uncertain significance c.10231-4 T > C (rs117180147) in RYR2 (NM_001035.2), with five being of Maori ancestry. This variant has no effect on essential splice donor or acceptor bases and is present rarely in East Asians (1.28%), but not seen in Caucasians [24, 36]. No Maori control data was available for comparison.

Disease-associated mutations

Ten rare variants were pathogenic or likely pathogenic and therefore considered disease-associated (Table 1). The majority of these were missense mutations (n = 9), with 1 truncation. This represents 10 SADS cases (5.1%); no disease-associated mutations were seen in more than 1 SADS case. A greater prevalence of mutations amongst female cases was seen with respect to LQTS/BrS risk-mutations (p = 0.03), though no significant difference was seen when considering all risk-genes (including RYR2, p = 0.73). No difference in mutation carrier status was seen between adults and children (p = 0.33).

Pathogenicity of LQTS/BrS risk-mutations

Fifteen rare variants were identified in LQTS/BrS risk-genes, with three disease-associated. Two were reported as previously associated with disease: KCNH2 (NM_000238.3) N-terminus variant p.G71R associated with LQTS type 2 [37]; SCN5A (NM_198056.2) variant p.T220I located in the first transmembrane domain (a region associated with high probability of pathogenicity) [18] which demonstrates in-vitro sodium channel dysfunction [38] and co-segregation with dilated cardiomyopathy and heart block [39]. A novel truncation p.W323* was detected in KCNQ1 and predicted to cause nonsense-mediated decay [40]. Neither rare variant in KCNE1 and KCNE2 were likely to be pathogenic by ACMG criteria.

Pathogenicity of RYR2 risk-mutations

The 10 rare variants in RYR2 (excluding the likely ethnic Maori splicing variant c.10231-4 T > C) lie within 10 different exons (7, 14, 37, 38, 47, 49, 54, 74, 88 and 95). Seven were categorised as disease-associated mutations. Five variants (p.R420Q, p.R2401H, p.G3946S and p.R4608Q) were categorised as disease-causing by HGMD, demonstrated 100% mammalian conservation and were previously reported [20, 41]; two other variants (p.T153I, p.G1750R) fulfilled ACMG criteria for likely pathogenicity based on in-silico predictions and conservation data.

Clinical diagnostic yield

Pathogenic or likely-pathogenic disease-associated mutations in major arrhythmia syndrome risk-genes were identified in 10 of 197 multi-ethnic SADS cases. This represents a diagnostic yield of 5.1% (95% CI 2.0–8.1%).

Discussion

This study reports on utility of a low-cost high-throughput PCR-based next generation sequencing molecular autopsy in a multi-ethnic internationally recruited series of SADS cases.

Diagnostic yield of molecular autopsy in SADS

Our multi-ethnic international cohort data support a clinical diagnostic yield for molecular autopsy of SADS cases of up to 5.1% amongst recognized major ion-channelopathy risk-genes, less than that from similarly-sized US studies [9, 10]. The Australasian population-based series of 113 cases demonstrated a comparable yield of 8.8% pathogenic and probably pathogenic mutations utilising NGS [4]. Our prior report (which overlaps with this study cohort) revealed a clinically relevant yield of 10.6% from the common risk-genes studied here, but differs by its use of hybridization-based NGS [17]. Although Wang et al. [10] report on a multi-ethnic SADS population from New York, our study is multi-centre and international. Hence, it remains unclear whether these differences in yield relate to: our complete use of PCR-based NGS as a primary diagnostic genetic methodology; definitions of pathogenicity; ethnicity differences; or local referral bias.

Potential role of NGS in SADS

NGS has been used for investigation of large SADS cohorts for partial coverage of SCN5A as part of a larger Sanger sequencing study [10], and exome or clinical NGS sequencing in Australasian [4], French [42] and UK [43] series in addition to our previous report [17]. NGS permits use of less DNA and confers greater genetic coverage than conventional technology, which is of particular importance in post-mortem cases where good quality genomic DNA is finite. Moreover, NGS amplification technologies are less labor intensive than Sanger sequencing.

Microfluidic muliplex PCR-based enrichment of candidate genes for NGS (i.e. Fluidigm) offers a balance of throughput and cost-efficiency [21]. Specifically, it offers targeted sequencing which is an order of magnitude cheaper than hybridization capture (e.g. SureSelect, Agilent, Santa Clara, California): approximately $25USD versus $200USD for capture and sequencing.

RYR2 mutation analysis

Our RYR2 yield (3.6%, n = 7/197) represents over half the clinically-relevant molecular yield, and falls within the range of yields from previously reported large series from USA and Australasia: 3.0% (n = 4/133) [10]; 3.5% (n = 4/113) [4]; and 11.6% (n = 20/173) [9]. The complete sequencing of RYR2 with NGS appears to contribute additional yield over limited exon-targeted approaches [9]; 20% (n = 2/10) of our RYR2 rare variants lay outside the 64 sequenced exons described by Tester et al. [9]; 40% (n = 4/10) would have been missed by a 3-tiered exon mutation analysis strategy for CPVT diagnosis [20].

Cardiological evaluation of blood relatives

In our population-based British SADS Optimization Cohort, where limited cardiac investigation of families was performed, mutations were not identified in the five SADS cases whose relatives were diagnosed with clinical disease [1]. Molecular autopsy increased our yield of genetic diagnoses (from 10.9 to 15.2%, n = 5 to 7). This reinforces the complementary approaches of familial cardiac investigation and molecular autopsy following a SADS death [4, 11, 17].

Genetic ancestry and the interpretation of genetic results

The RYR2 splice site variant (c.10231-4 T > C) was present in 5 of the 27 Maori/Polynesian cases. ExAC identifies 1.28% minor allele frequency in East Asians for this variant, and lower frequencies in African and Latino populations. This is plausible as a risk factor for arrhythmic death, similar to that seen with SCN5A-S1103Y in the African-American population [44]. Similarly, SCN5A-R1193Q has in vitro sodium channel dysfunction and associates with channelopathic disease in Europeans [45], yet the variant is common in Maori, and occurs in over 10% of the Han Chinese [46]. With most studies focusing on ethnic Europeans, there is a risk that other groups may be denied the benefits of genetic diagnosis.

Clinical implications of the Fluidigm/Illumina NGS platform

Our PPV of 16% mandates approximately 6 variants to be verified by Sanger sequencing for the detection of one true mutation (i.e. five false positives for every true rare variant), with no additional bioinformatics optimization identified to improve this. We believe missed common variants in amplified regions (>10x coverage) of the Optimization Cohort related to preferential amplification of one allele. These findings compare unfavourably with application of this technology in living individuals [14], and could be explained by increased PCR errors encountered in use of lower quality post-mortem DNA. This was supported by appearance of clustering of false positive results in specific cases, suggestive of a DNA sampling issue; no other specific features of false positives were identified to assist in filtering them out. Notably, preferential amplification of a single allele is a recognized limitation of microfluidic PCR-based amplification due to the number of PCR cycles required.

PCR errors are exacerbated by microfluidic technology due to the greater requirement for amplification. Additionally, PCR duplicates were not removed by bioinformatic processing prior to variant calling; removal of duplicates following PCR-based target selection would serve to reduce depth of coverage uniformly to less than 10x, rendering variant calling even less reliable. Given the low likelihood for identical PCR errors with repetition, false positives may be reduced by performing each amplification (and subsequent NGS) in duplicate and only considering variants to be present when identified in both duplicates. However, this method would serve to double the cost per sample of the Fluidigm/Illumina platform in this context. Additionally, the impact on allele amplification and subsequent sensitivity for rare variant identification of this approach is unknown.

Though the financial advantage is being eroded by declining cost of more precise capture technologies such as hybridization [21], this NGS platform may remain useful as an initial screening strategy until economic costs become comparable. In comparison with limited analysis of non-synonymous rare variants in the same risk-genes, no additional clinically relevant variants were identified by hybridization target selection methodology in the 87 cases which overlapped with our prior report [17].

Study limitations

This study did not analyze small insertions and deletions; such structural rearrangements represent a minority of mutations, making up only 1 in 10 of those with definite LQTS [47, 48]. Copy number variants were not assessed; none were identified in the major risk-genes by Bagnall et al. in their molecular autopsy study [4]. Similarly, we did not address intronic mutations, which are rare in clinical practice, and require large families for co-segregation and in vitro study for confirmation of clinical relevance [49, 50]. GATK v1.5 was used as the updated open-source version available at the time of bioinformatic optimization; we acknowledge that this software has since been improved with respect to variant calling which may further improve the diagnostic precision of the technology.

Clinical data pertaining to surviving blood relatives was not studied systematically; co-segregation did not contribute to novel mutation disease-causing status, which is a significant limitation in the context of forensic post-mortem mutation analysis. Although cardiomyopathy and other arrhythmia syndrome genes were not evaluated, they are likely to contribute less significantly to SADS and pose even greater uncertainty for pathogenicity [4, 17, 43]. The cohort of New Zealand cases was biased by exclusion of a majority (9 of 11) identified LQTS-risk gene variant carriers; these cases did not undergo RYR2 mutation analysis. Nonetheless, only three would be classified pathogenic or likely pathogenic by modern ACMG criteria, resulting in a minimally affected molecular autopsy yield of 6.3% (n = 13/206) if the study cohort was unselected.

Conclusion

The combination of Fluidigm Access Array with Illumina HiSeq NGS to sequence a selected panel of LQTS/BrS and CPVT risk-genes offers a moderate diagnostic yield of 5.1% amongst SADS cases. Although the low PPV mandates confirmation of mutational variants by Sanger-sequencing, molecular autopsy may also still add significant yield to clinical evaluation of blood relatives.

Availability of data and materials

Rare variant data analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files. The raw datasets are not publicly available, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

bp:

Base pairs

BrS:

Brugada syndrome

CI:

Confidence interval

CPVT:

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic acid

LQTS:

Long QT syndrome

NGS:

Next generation sequencing

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

SADS:

Sudden arrhythmic death syndrome

SCD:

Sudden cardiac death

SSCA:

Single strand conformational analysis

References

  1. Behr E, Wood DA, Wright M, Syrris P, Sheppard MN, Casey A, et al. Cardiological assessment of first-degree relatives in sudden arrhythmic death syndrome. Lancet. 2003;362:1457–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Priori SG, Wilde AA, Horie M, Cho Y, Behr ER, Berul C, et al. Executive summary: HRS/EHRA/APHRS expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of patients with inherited primary arrhythmia syndromes. Europace. 2013;15:1389–406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Raju H, Behr ER. Unexplained sudden death, focussing on genetics and family phenotyping. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2013;28:19–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bagnall RD, Weintraub RG, Ingles J, Duflou J, Yeates L, Lam L, et al. A prospective study of sudden cardiac death among children and young adults. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:2441–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Winkel BG, Holst AG, Theilade J, Kristensen IB, Thomsen JL, Ottesen GL, et al. Nationwide study of sudden cardiac death in persons aged 1-35 years. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:983–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Basso C, Aguilera B, Banner J, Cohle S, d’Amati G, de Gouveia RH, et al. Guidelines for autopsy investigation of sudden cardiac death: 2017 update from the Association for European Cardiovascular Pathology. Virchows Arch Int J Pathol. 2017; epub prior to publication.

  7. Behr ER, Dalageorgou C, Christiansen M, Syrris P, Hughes S, Tome Esteban MT, et al. Sudden arrhythmic death syndrome: familial evaluation identifies inheri heart disease in the majority of families. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:1670–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Campuzano O, Allegue C, Partemi S, Iglesias A, Oliva A, Brugada R. Negative autopsy and sudden cardiac death. Int J Legal Med. 2014;128:599–606.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tester DJ, Medeiros-Dtableomingo A, Will ML, Haglund CM, Ackerman MJ. Cardiac channel molecular autopsy: insights from 173 consecutive cases of autopsy-negative sudden unexplained death referred for postmortem genetic testing. Mayo Clin Proc Mayo Clin. 2012;87:524–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang D, Shah KR, Um SY, Eng LS, Zhou B, Lin Y, et al. Cardiac channelopathy testing in 274 ethnically diverse sudden unexplained deaths. Forensic Sci Int. 2014;237:90–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Skinner JR, Crawford J, Smith W, Aitken A, Heaven D, Evans C-A, et al. Prospective, population-based long QT molecular autopsy study of postmortem negative sudden death in 1 to 40 year olds. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:412–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Priori SG, Blomström-Lundqvist C, Mazzanti A, Blom N, Borggrefe M, Camm J, et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: the task force for the Management of Patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). Eur Heart J. 2015;36:2793–867.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Michaud K, Mangin P, Elger BS. Genetic analysis of sudden cardiac death victims: a survey of current forensic autopsy practices. Int J Legal Med. 2011;125:359–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Li X, Buckton AJ, Wilkinson SL, John S, Walsh R, Novotny T, et al. Towards clinical molecular diagnosis of inherited cardiac conditions: a comparison of bench-top genome DNA sequencers. PLoS One. 2013;8:e67744.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Behr ER, Casey A, Sheppard M, Wright M, Bowker TJ, Davies MJ, et al. Sudden arrhythmic death syndrome: a national survey of sudden unexplained cardiac death. Heart. 2007;93:601–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Gladding PA, Evans C-A, Crawford J, Chung SK, Vaughan A, Webster D, et al. Posthumous diagnosis of long QT syndrome from neonatal screening cards. Heart Rhythm. 2010;7:481–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lahrouchi N, Raju H, Lodder EM, Papatheodorou E, Ware JS, Papadakis M, et al. Utility of post-mortem genetic testing in cases of sudden arrhythmic death syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:2134–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kapa S, Tester DJ, Salisbury BA, Harris-Kerr C, Pungliya MS, Alders M, et al. Genetic testing for long-QT syndrome: distinguishing pathogenic mutations from benign variants. Circulation. 2009;120:1752–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Kapplinger JD, Tester DJ, Salisbury BA, Carr JL, Harris-Kerr C, Pollevick GD, et al. Spectrum and prevalence of mutations from the first 2,500 consecutive unrelated patients referred for the FAMILION long QT syndrome genetic test. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6:1297–303.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Medeiros-Domingo A, Bhuiyan ZA, Tester DJ, Hofman N, Bikker H, van Tintelen JP, et al. The RYR2-encoded ryanodine receptor/calcium release channel in patients diagnosed previously with either catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia or genotype negative, exercise-induced long QT syndrome: a comprehensive open reading frame mutational analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:2065–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ware JS, John S, Roberts AM, Buchan R, Gong S, Peters NS, et al. Next generation diagnostics in inherited arrhythmia syndromes : a comparison of two approaches. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2013;6:94–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, et al. The genome analysis toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20:1297–303.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lek M, Karczewski KJ, Minikel EV, Samocha KE, Banks E, Fennell T, et al. Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature. 2016;536:285–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Exome Variant Server [Internet]. The goal of the NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project (ESP) is to discover novel genes and mechanisms contributing to heart, lung and blood disorders by pioneering the application of next-generation sequencing of the protein coding regions of the human genome across diverse, richly-phenotyped populations and to share these datasets and findings with the scientific community to extend and enrich the diagnosis, management and treatment of heart, lung and blood disorders. [cited 2017 Mar 5]. Available from: http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/.

  25. ExAC Browser [Internet]. The data set provided on this website spans 60,706 unrelated individuals sequenced as part of various disease-specific and population genetic studies. [cited 2017 Mar 5]. Available from: http://exac.broadinstitute.org/

  26. Wildeman M, Ophuizen EV, van Ophuizen E, den Dunnen JT, Taschner PEM. Improving sequence variant descriptions in mutation databases and literature using the Mutalyzer sequence variation nomenclature checker. Hum Mutat. 2008;29:6–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. LUMC Mutalyzer 2.0.23 [Internet]. The aim of this program suite is to support checks of sequence variant nomenclature according to the guidelines of the human genome variation society. [cited 2017 Mar 5]. Available from: https://www.mutalyzer.nl/.

  28. PolyPhen-2: prediction of functional effects of human nsSNPs [Internet]. PolyPhen-2 (Polymorphism Phenotyping v) is a tool which predicts possible impact of an amino acid substitution on the structure and function of a human protein using straightforward physical and comparative considerations. [cited 2017 Mar 5]. Available from: http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/

  29. Kumar P, Henikoff S, Ng PC. Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:1073–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. SIFT Home [Internet]. SIFT predicts whether an amino acid substitution affects protein function. SIFT prediction is based on the degree of conservation of amino acid residues in sequence alignments derived from closely related sequences, collected through PSI-BLAST. [cited 2017 Mar 5]. Available from: http://sift.jcvi.org/

  31. Schwarz JM, Cooper DN, Schuelke M, Seelow D. MutationTaster2: mutation prediction for the deep-sequencing age. Nat Methods. 2014;11:361–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. MutationTaster [Internet]. [cited 2017 Mar 5]. Available from: http://www.mutationtaster.org/

  33. MutationAssessor.org /// functional impact of protein mutations [Internet]. This server predicts the functional impact of amino-acid substitutions in proteins, such as mutations discovered in cancer or missense polymorphisms. The functional impact is assessed based on evolutionary conservation of the affected amino acid in protein homologs. The method has been validated on a large set (60k) of disease associated (OMIM) and polymorphic variants. [cited 2017 Mar 5]. Available from: http://mutationassessor.org/r3/

  34. ClinVar [Internet]. ClinVar aggregates information about genomic variation and its relationship to human health. [cited 2017 Mar 5]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/

  35. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 1000 Genomes Project Consortium, Auton A, Brooks LD, Durbin RM, Garrison EP, Kang HM, et al. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature. 2015;526:68–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Napolitano C, Priori SG, Schwartz PJ, Bloise R, Ronchetti E, Nastoli J, et al. Genetic testing in the long QT syndrome: development and validation of an efficient approach to genotyping in clinical practice. JAMA. 2005;294:2975–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Benson DW, Wang DW, Dyment M, Knilans TK, Fish FA, Strieper MJ, et al. Congenital sick sinus syndrome caused by recessive mutations in the cardiac sodium channel gene (SCN5A). J Clin Invest. 2003;112:1019–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Olson TM, Michels VV, Ballew JD, Reyna SP, Karst ML, Herron KJ, et al. Sodium channel mutations and susceptibility to heart failure and atrial fibrillation. JAMA. 2005;293:447–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Schwarz JM, Rödelsperger C, Schuelke M, Seelow D. MutationTaster evaluates disease-causing potential of sequence alterations. Nat Methods. 2010;7:575–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Priori SG, Napolitano C, Memmi M, Colombi B, Drago F, Gasparini M, et al. Clinical and molecular characterization of patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 2002;106:69–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Farrugia A, Keyser C, Hollard C, Raul JS, Muller J, Ludes B. Targeted next generation sequencing application in cardiac channelopathies: analysis of a cohort of autopsy-negative sudden unexplained deaths. Forensic Sci Int. 2015;254:5–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Nunn LM, Lopes LR, Syrris P, Murphy C, Plagnol V, Firman E, et al. Diagnostic yield of molecular autopsy in patients with sudden arrhythmic death syndrome using targeted exome sequencing. Europace. 2016;18:888–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Cheng J, Tester DJ, Tan B-H, Valdivia CR, Kroboth S, Ye B, et al. The common African American polymorphism SCN5A-S1103Y interacts with mutation SCN5A-R680H to increase late Na current. Physiol Genomics. 2011;43:461–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Winkel BG, Yuan L, Olesen MS, Sadjadieh G, Wang Y, Risgaard B, et al. The role of the sodium current complex in a nonreferred nationwide cohort of sudden infant death syndrome. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:1241–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hwang HW, Chen JJ, Lin YJ, Shieh RC, Lee MT, Hung SI, et al. R1193Q of SCN5A, a Brugada and long QT mutation, is a common polymorphism in Han Chinese. J Med Genet. 2005;42:e7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Eddy C-A, MacCormick JM, Chung S-K, Crawford JR, Love DR, Rees MI, et al. Identification of large gene deletions and duplications in KCNQ1 and KCNH2 in patients with long QT syndrome. Heart Rhythm. 2008;5:1275–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Bansal V, Libiger O. A probabilistic method for the detection and genotyping of small indels from population-scale sequence data. Bioinforma Oxf Engl. 2011;27:2047–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Crotti L, Lewandowska MA, Schwartz PJ, Insolia R, Pedrazzini M, Bussani E, et al. A KCNH2 branch point mutation causing aberrant splicing contributes to an explanation of genotype-negative long QT syndrome. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6:212–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhang L, Vincent GM, Baralle M, Baralle FE, Anson BD, Benson DW, et al. An intronic mutation causes long QT syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:1283–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Dutch cases were studied within the framework of CTMM (Center for Translational Molecular Medicine) project COHFAR. The Cardiac Inherited Disease Registry New Zealand is supported by Cure Kids. Cases from New Zealand were studied with the permission of the chief coroner for New Zealand. This research has been conducted using the Danish National Biobank resource, supported by the Novo Nordisk Foundation. The authors would like to thank the Exome Aggregation Consortium and the groups that provided exome variant data for comparison. A full list of contributing groups can be found at http://exac.broadinstitute.org/about.

Funding

The project was funded by British Heart Foundation Fellowship Grant FS/11/71/28918; the funding body had no influence on design of the study, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data or writing the manuscript. We acknowledge additional support from: Cardiac Risk in the Young (ERB, HR, MNS, SS); Netherlands CardioVascular Research Initiative, the Dutch Heart Foundation, Dutch Federation of University Medical Centres, the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development and the Royal Netherlands Academy of Sciences (AAMW, CvdW); Wellcome Trust (JSW).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cardiovascular Sciences Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, SW17 0RE, UK

    Hariharan Raju, Gavin Arno, Sanjay Sharma, Steve Jeffery, Mary N. Sheppard & Elijah R. Behr

  2. Health Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Suite 203, 2 Technology Place, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia

    Hariharan Raju

  3. NIHR Royal Brompton Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK

    James S. Ware, Xinzhong Li & Shibu John

  4. Greenlane Paediatric and Congenital Cardiac Services, Starship Childrens Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand

    Jonathan R. Skinner

  5. Department for Congenital Disorders, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Paula L. Hedley & Michael Christiansen

  6. Diagnostic Genetics, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand

    Donald R. Love

  7. Amsterdam UMC, Heart Centre, and Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

    Christian van der Werf & Arthur A. M. Wilde

  8. Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

    Jacob Tfelt-Hansen & Bo Gregers Winkel

  9. Department of Forensic Medicine, University of Copenhagen, København, Denmark

    Jacob Tfelt-Hansen

  10. Histopathology Department, Sheffield Children’s Hospital, Sheffield, UK

    Marta C. Cohen

  11. School of Science, Engineering and Design, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK

    Xinzhong Li

  12. ERN-GUARD Heart (European Union), Brussels, Belgium

    Jacob Tfelt-Hansen, Bo Gregers Winkel, Arthur A. M. Wilde, Mary N. Sheppard & Elijah R. Behr

  13. Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Michael Christiansen

Authors
  1. Hariharan Raju
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James S. Ware
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jonathan R. Skinner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Paula L. Hedley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gavin Arno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Donald R. Love
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Christian van der Werf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jacob Tfelt-Hansen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Bo Gregers Winkel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Marta C. Cohen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Xinzhong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Shibu John
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Sanjay Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Steve Jeffery
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Arthur A. M. Wilde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Michael Christiansen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Mary N. Sheppard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Elijah R. Behr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HR and ERB conceived the study and were major contributors in writing the manuscript. HR, JSW, JRS, PLH, GA, DRL, CVDW, JTH, BGW, MCC, XL, SJ, SS, SJ, AAMW, MC, MNS and ERB contributed to data collection and initial analysis. HR, JSW, PH, GA and MC performed variant data analysis. HR, JSW, JRS, PLH, GA, DRL, CVDW, JTH, BGW, MCC, XL, SJ, SS, SJ, AAMW, MC, MNS and ERB read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hariharan Raju or Elijah R. Behr.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol conforms to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki as reflected in a priori approval by the Research Ethics Service Wandsworth (Ref 10H/0803/72); written consent was provided by next of kin for participation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

ERB has received independent research grants from Biotronik and St Jude Medical.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional file

Additional file 1:

Tables and References supporting ACMG classification of variants identified. (PDF 811 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raju, H., Ware, J.S., Skinner, J.R. et al. Next-generation sequencing using microfluidic PCR enrichment for molecular autopsy. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 19, 174 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-019-1154-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-019-1154-8

Keywords

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2261

Contact us