Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Trends in electrocardiographic abnormalities and risk of cardiovascular mortality in Lithuania, 1986–2015

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders201919:30

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-019-1009-3

©  The Author(s). 2019

  • Received: 18 June 2018
  • Accepted: 23 January 2019
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to assess the trends in the prevalence of electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities from 1986 to 2015 and impact of ECG abnormalities on risk of death from cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in the Lithuanian population aged 40–64 years.

Methods

Data from four surveys carried out in Kaunas city and five randomly selected municipalities of Lithuania were analysed. A resting ECG was recorded and CVD risk factors were measured in each survey. ECG abnormalities were evaluated using Minnesota Code (MC). Trends in age-standardized prevalence of ECG abnormalities were estimated for both sexes. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for coronary heart disease (CHD) and CVD mortality. Net reclassification index (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement and other indices were used for evaluation of improvement in the prediction of CVD and CHD mortality risk after addition of ECG abnormalities variable to Cox models.

Results

From1986 to 2008, the decrease in the prevalence of Q-QS MC was observed in both genders. The prevalence of high R waves increased in men, while the prevalence of ST segment and T wave abnormalities as well as arrhythmias decreased in women. Ischemic changes and possible MI were associated with a 2.5-fold and 4.4-fold higher risk of death from CVD in men and 1.51-fold and 2.56-fold higher mortality risk from CVD in women as compared to individuals with marginal or no ECG abnormalities. The addition of ECG abnormalities to traditional CVD risk factors improved Cox regression models performance. According to NRI, 18.6% of men were correctly reclassified in CVD mortality prediction model and 25.2% of men - in CHD mortality prediction model.

Conclusions

the decreasing trends in the prevalence of ischemia on ECG in women and increasing trends in the prevalence of left VH in men were observed. ECG abnormalities were associated with higher risk of CVD mortality. The addition of ECG abnormalities to the prediction models modestly improved the prediction of CVD mortality beyond traditional CVD risk factors. The use of ECG as routine screening to identify high risk individuals for more intensive preventive interventions warrants further research.

Keywords

  • Mortality
  • Electrocardiographic abnormalities
  • Risk factors
  • Trends
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Middle-aged population

Background

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the main cause of death accounting for about one third of all deaths among both genders globally [1]. Deaths rates from CVD in Lithuania, a country of Eastern Europe, are significantly higher than in Northern, Southern and Western Europe countries [2]. In 2014, age-standardized mortality rate from CVD was 303.3 per 100,000 Lithuanian men aged 25–64 years as compared to 96.8 per 100,000 men in European Union countries. In women of the same age group, the difference in CVD mortality rate between Lithuania and EU was also high (75.0 and 32.1 per 100,000 women, respectively) [3].

The electrocardiography (ECG) is a routine, accessible, inexpensive, and non-invasive tool for diagnosis of CVD. Previous studies have reported that abnormalities on resting ECG have been independently associated with increased CVD risk [4–8]. However, the usefulness of ECG in screening of asymptomatic adults is still debatable because clinical implications of ECG abnormalities are unclear in low risk individuals [9]. Current evidence is insufficient to assess the benefits of ECG as screening tool in a population with high cardiovascular risk. Epidemiological studies carried out in Lithuanian adult population showed high prevalence of traditional CVD risk factors and ECG abnormalities [10, 11]. Considering this situation, incorporation of ECG abnormalities in CVD risk prediction might be useful in Lithuanian population. To date, few studies have analysed the improvement of CVD risk prediction adding ECG abnormalities to traditional CVD risk factors [12, 13].

Therefore, the aim of the present study was to estimate the trends in the prevalence of ECG abnormalities from 1986 to 2015 and the impact of ECG abnormalities on risk of death from CVD in the Lithuanian population aged 40–64 years.

Methods

Study sample

Four cross-sectional surveys of random samples representing the Lithuanian population aged 40–64 years were performed in 1986–1987, 1992–1993, 1999–2002, and 2006–2008. The surveys were carried out in Kaunas city and five municipalities of Lithuania from the northern, southern, eastern, western, and central regions of the country (Joniskis, Kaisiadorys, Kretinga, Kupiskis, and Varena). For each survey, an independent random sample, stratified by age and sex, was drawn from the Kaunas population register and from the lists of the individuals registered at the primary health care centres of municipalities. The selected individuals were invited to health examination sending them the invitation letters by mail. The response rates in the five cross-sectional surveys were 70.2, 69.6%, 58.6, 62.4, and 58.1% respectively. Participants with missing or inadequate ECG data (1.2%, similar numbers in all surveys) were excluded. Respondents with clinically diagnosed documented acute myocardial infarction (MI) were also excluded from analysis (the proportion of excluded respondents was 7.5% (8.5, 6.0, 7.1, 6.5, and 7.0% in the respective surveys). In total, data of 11,904 individuals (5427 men and 6477 women) were analysed.

All four studies were approved by the Lithuanian Regional Bioethics Committee. All participants signed informed consent form. Data of individual participants were not reported.

Measurements

The measurements were taken in outpatient departments by the team consisting of trained doctors and nurses. In each survey, the measurements were performed using the same methodology. BP was measured twice from the right brachial artery with a standard mercury sphygmomanometer in the sitting position after 5 min of rest. Arterial hypertension (AH) was defined as systolic BP ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg, or BP < 140/90 mmHg taking antihypertensive medication for the last two weeks before medical examination.

Weight and height were measured with a stadiometer and a calibrated medical scale, without shoes and wearing light indoor clothing. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as the ratio of weight (in kilograms) divided by the square of height (in meters) (kg/m2). A BMI within 18.5–24.99 kg/m2 was classified as normal weight, while a BMI within 25.0–29.99 kg/m2 was considered as overweight and participants with BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m2 were classified as obese.

Fasting (at least 12 h) venous blood specimens were taken to determine lipid levels that were measured in blood serum by conventional enzymatic method in the certified laboratories. Dyslipidemias were defined as: high total cholesterol level – higher than or equal to 5.0 mmol/L; high low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level – higher than or equal to 3.0 mmol/L; low high density (HDL) cholesterol level – lower than 1.0 mmol/L for men and lower than 1.2 mmol/L for women, elevated triglycerides level – higher than or equal to 1.7 mmol/L.

Participants were classified as regular smokers (smoked at least one cigarette per day) and others.

A resting electrocardiogram was recorded in the 12 standard leads, with the calibration of 10 mm per 1 mV and paper speed of 25 mm per second. ECG records were read by 2 independent experienced coders (trained cardiologists) using the 1982 edition of the Minnesota Code (MC) [14]. Discrepancies between two coders were resolved by a senior coder (experienced cardiologist). The ECG findings were classified into 6 large groups [15]: 1) Q-QS waves – MC 1.1–1.3; 2) major ST segment and T wave changes – MC 4.1–4.3 or MC 5.1–5.3; 3) high R waves – MC 3.1 or MC 3.3; 4) left axis deviation – MC 2.1; 5) arrhythmias – MC 8.1–8.6 or MC 8.9 or MC 6.1–6.2 or MC 6.4 or MC 6.8; 6) blocks – MC 7.1 or MC 7.2 or MC 7.4. For further analysis, clinically meaningful combinations of ECG abnormalities were considered: 1) definite MI – MC 1.1 or MC (1.2 + 5.1 or 5.2); 2) possible MI - MC 1.3 + MC 5.1 or MC 5.2; or MC 1.2 alone; 3) left ventricular hypertrophy (VH) – MC 3.1 or 3.3 + any MC 4.1–4.3 or 5.1–5.3; 4) ischemia – MC 1.3 or MC 4.1–4.3 or MC 5.1–5.3; 5) marginal or no ECG abnormalities – all other codes. The five categories were hierarchically produced from the most to the least severe.

Follow up data of the individuals from Kaunas surveys were used for analysis of associations between ECG abnormalities and CHD or CVD mortality risk (n = 6090). Deaths were identified from the regional mortality register. Causes of death were coded by versions 9 and 10 of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD): CVD mortality included codes 390–458 of ICD-9 and I00-I99 of ICD-10; deaths from CHD included codes 410–414 of ICD-9 and I20-I25 of ICD-10. During period of 1986–2015, there were 1058 death cases from any cause, 503 deaths from CVD and 311 deaths from CHD.

Statistical analysis

The statistical software package IBM SPSS Statistics 20 and the R statistical software were used for data analysis separately for men and women. We applied data weighting adjustment technique to match the age distribution of the Lithuanian population aged 40–64 years in 2008. The differences in age-adjusted means of variables between the surveys and between men and women were assessed using ANOVA analysis with Bonferroni multiple comparison test. A chi-squared test and z test with Bonferroni corrections were used for assessing the differences in categorical variables. P < 0.05 values were considered statistically significant.

Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated by the multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression for CVD and CHD mortality. First of all, HRs were calculated for five categories of clinically meaningful combinations of ECG abnormalities with adjustment for study number and CVD risk factors, such as age, AH, smoking, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and BMI. Later, the predictive ability of Cox regression Model 1, which included only above mentioned CVD risk factors, was compared with predictive ability of the Model 2 extended by ECG abnormalities. ECG abnormalities were categorized into two groups – 1) absent or marginal ECG abnormalities and 2) any of clinically meaningful ECG abnormality. The additional predictive value of the models was determined using log-likelihood ratio (likelihood ratio test - LRT). Lower P values indicated larger difference between predictive quality of the models. The incremental prognostic impact of the new predictor (ECG abnormality) was estimated with Harrel’s C statistic, integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and the net reclassification improvement index (NRI) [16, 17]. Harrel’s C statistic is an established measure of model discrimination for binary outcomes and is assessed by calculating the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve. IDI is a relatively independent of risk thresholds and categories measure of the ability of the extended model to improve average sensitivity without compromising average specificity. NRI was calculated to determine the extent to which incorporation of additional variable into the prediction models improve the reclassification of individuals. IDI and NRI were calculated at 10 years of follow-up.

Results

Age-standardized prevalence of ECG abnormalities among Lithuanian men and women aged 40–64 years is presented in Table 1. The prevalence of Q-QS codes significantly decreased from 4.1% in 1986–1987 to 2.1% in 2006–2008 in men and from 3.2 to 2.1% in women. In men, the prevalence of left axis deviation and high R waves showed a significant increase between the first and last survey, while no significant trends in those abnormalities were found in women. A significant decrease in the prevalence of ST segment and T wave abnormalities and arrhythmias in women was observed from 1986 to 1987 to 2006–2008.
Table 1

Age-standardized prevalence of ECG abnormalities in Lithuanian population aged 40–64 years

Prevalence of ECG abnormalities

Study years

P from chi squared

1986–1987

1992–1993

1999–2002

2006–2008

Men (n)

1496

926

1119

1886

 

 Q - QS codes, %

4.1

3.8*

2.5*

2.1a

0.002

 Left axis deviation, %

4.3*

5.5*

3.3

5.2*

0.048

 ST-T codes, %

6.3*

3.8a, *

5.0*

5.1

0.057

 High R waves, %

6.3*

5.8*

9.0a, b, *

9.5a, b, *

< 0.001

 Arrhythmia, %

5.3

5.9

4.7*

4.4*

0.295

 Blocks, %

1.4

1.4*

1.8*

1.8*

0.729

 Definite myocardial infarction, %

1.2*

1.0*

0.8*

0.5*

< 0.001

 Possible myocardial infarction, %

1.2

1.1

0.7

0.7*

 

 Left ventricular hypertrophy, %

3.1

4.0*

6.3 a, *

5.8 a, *

 

 Ischemia, %

5.9*

4.0*

4.0*

4.7

 

 Marginal abnormalities or absent, %

88.6*

89.8

88.1

88.3*

 

Women (n)

1609

1114

1415

2339

 

 Q - QS codes, %

3.2

1.8

1.1a

2.1

< 0.001

 Left axis deviation, %

2.8

2.8

2.2

2.7

0.696

 ST-T codes, %

12.9

7.7a

9.1a

5.9a, c

< 0.001

 High R waves, %

4.2

2.7

3.7

3.5

0.233

 Arrhythmia, %

4.8

4.2

2.6a

3.1a

0.004

 Blocks, %

0.7

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.869

 Definite myocardial infarction, %

0.4

0.0

0.2

0.2

< 0.001

 Possible myocardial infarction, %

1.4

0.6

0.4a

1.4c

 

 Left ventricular hypertrophy, %

2.6

1.7

2.1

2.2

 

 Ischemia, %

12.3

8.2a

8.4a

5.9a, c

 

 Marginal abnormalities or absent, %

83.2

89.5a

88.9a

90.3a

 

ap < 0.05 compared to 1986–1987, Bonferroni test. bp < 0.05 compared to 1992–1993, Bonferroni test. cp < 0.05 compared to 1999–2002, Bonferroni test. *p < 0.05 compared men to women

ECG: electrocardiogram

Bold typeface of P values indicates significance

In the majority of the surveys, the prevalence of ST segment and T wave abnormalities was significantly higher in women than men, while the prevalence of other ECG abnormalities was higher in men compared to women (Table 1).

Analysis of clinically meaningful ECG abnormalities showed that the prevalence of left VH in men increased from 3.1% in 1986–1987 to 5.8% in 2006–2008, whereas the prevalence of ischemia in women decreased from 12.3 to 5.9% during the same period.

Age-standardized mean levels and the prevalence of main risk factors among men and women were analysed using the pooled data from all surveys (Tables 2 and 3). The men with definite MI were older than men with marginal or absent ECG abnormalities. They had higher mean total and LDL cholesterol levels and lower level of systolic BP as compared to men with left VH. In men with ischemia, mean levels of systolic and diastolic BP, BMI and triglycerides were higher than in men with marginal or absent ECG abnormalities.
Table 2

Age-standardized mean values and prevalence of risk factors in men by ECG abnormality group

ECG abnormalities

Mean values and prevalence

Definite MI

Possible MI

Left VH

Ischemia

Marginal or absent

P from Anova

 

n = 45

n = 51

n = 263

n = 258

n = 4810

 

Age, years, mean (SD)

54.7 (6.49)

53.9 (6.25)

51.3a (7.44)

54.2c (6.88)

51.1a,b,d (6.87)

< 0.001

Systolic BP, mmHg, mean (SD)

142.9 (25.7)

152.1 (32.)

153.2a(25.4)

154.7 a (24.5)

142.7b,c,d (20.9)

< 0.001

Diastolic BP, mmHg, mean (SD)

91.3 (13.0)

94.7 (21.4)

97.4 (13.0)

96.6 (14.0)

91.3c,d (12.4)

< 0.001

BMI, kg/m2, mean (SD)

27.6 (4.82)

29.0 (4.43)

27.2 (4.04)

29.2 c (4.78)

27.6d (4.56)

< 0.001

Total cholesterol, mmol/L, mean (SD)

6.29 (1.21)

6.12 (1.31)

5.73a (1.16)

6.03 (1.23)

5.88 (1.20)

0.007

LDL cholesterol, mmol/L, mean (SD)

4.27 (1.16)

4.00 (1.08)

3.63a (1.13)

3.92 (1.11)

3.81 (1.17)

0.006

HDL cholesterol, mmol/L, mean (SD)

1.26 (0.27)

1.17 (0.33)

1.39b (0.39)

1.27 c (0.45)

1.35 (0.43)

0.001

Triglycerides, mmol/L, mean, (SD)

1.37 (0.58)

2.04a (1.73)

1.63 (0.93)

1.83 (1.12)

1.62d (1.02)

0.001

      

P from χ2

Arterial hypertension, %

63.3

82.4

80.5

83.3a

64.7c,d

< 0.001

Regular smoking, %

35.6

25.5

37.8

41.1

39.7

0.274

Total cholesterol > 5.0 mmol/L, %

86.0

87.2

71.5

79.3

76.9

0.045

LDL cholesterol > 3.0 mmol/L, %

88.6

86.0

66.9

82.7c

75.4c

< 0.001

HDL cholesterol < 1.0 mmol/L, %

16.7

32.6

11.1b

29.1c

19.5c, d

< 0.001

Triglycerides > 1.7 mmol/L, %

26.2

48.9

37.4

44.6

34.1d

0.002

Normal weight, BMI < 25.0 kg/m2, %

29.5

13.7

29.0

19.4

29.2d

< 0.001

Overweight, BMI 25.0–29.9 kg/m2,%

50.0

47.1

48.5

42.2

44.7

 

Obesity, BMI > 30.0 kg/m2, %

20.5

39.2

22.5

38.4c

26.1d

 

ap < 0.05 compared to definite MI group, Bonferroni test. bp < 0.05 compared to possible MI group, Bonferroni test. cp < 0.05 compared to left VH group, Bonferroni test, dp < 0.05 compared to left VH group, Bonferroni test. BMI body mass index, BP blood pressure, ECG electrocardiogram, HDL high-density lipoproteins, MI myocardial infarction, LDL low-density lipoproteins, SD standard deviation, VH ventricular hypertrophy

Bold typeface of P values indicates significance

Table 3

Age-standardized mean values and prevalence of risk factors in women by ECG abnormality group

ECG abnormalities

Mean values and prevalence

Definite MI

Possible MI

Left VH

Ischemia

Marginal or absent

P from Anova

 

n = 14

n = 69

n = 584

n = 105

n = 5705

 

Age, years, mean (SD)

53.0 (6.40)

51.0 (7.41)

54.3b (6.66)

53.9b (6.62)

50.9c,d (6.91)

< 0.001

Systolic BP, mmHg, mean (SD)

168.9 (38.9)

150.3 (28.2.)

162.5b (27.1)

146.3a,c (25.8)

139.1a,b,c,d (22.8)

< 0.001

Diastolic BP, mmHg, mean (SD)

98.8 (19.0)

91.4 (14.4)

97.0b (13.7)

90.2c (13.0)

87.5a,c,d (12.1)

< 0.001

BMI, kg/m2, mean (SD)

32.3 (6.79)

30.1 (5.14)

31.3 (6.28)

30.2 (5.71)

29.2c,d (5.63)

< 0.001

Total cholesterol, mmol/L, mean (SD)

5.68 (1.08)

5.78 (1.39)

6.14 (1.21)

6.40b (1.47)

5.99d (1.27)

< 0.001

LDL cholesterol, mmol/L, mean (SD)

3.12 (0.99)

3.56 (1.29)

3.95 (1.19)

4.22a,b (1.39)

3.83d (1.21)

< 0.001

HDL cholesterol, mmol/L, mean (SD)

1.66 (1.02)

1.41 (0.39)

1.51 (0.41)

1.47 (0.41)

1.51 (0.41)

0.072

Triglycerides, mmol/L, mean, (SD)

1.49 (0.77)

1.53 (1.00)

1.54 (0.74)

1.60 (0.95)

1.45d (0.77)

0.001

      

P from χ2

Arterial hypertension, %

85.7

68.2

86.2b

65.0c

55.4c,d

< 0.001

Regular smoking, %

21.4

8.7

7.0

5.7

9.1

0.030

Total cholesterol > 5.0 mmol/L, %

76.9

72.1

85.9

85.3

78.6d

0.001

LDL cholesterol > 3.0 mmol/L, %

54.5

70.0

77.3

82.9

74.6d

0.001

HDL cholesterol < 1.0 mmol/L, %

41.7

32.3

21.5

25.2

22.3

0.072

Triglycerides > 1.7 mmol/L, %

25.0

24.2

31.3

34.5

28.5

0.065

Normal weight, BMI < 25.0 kg/m2, %

7.7

17.1

15.6

19.7

24.2

< 0.001

Overweight, BMI 25.0–29.9 kg/m2,%

23.1

30.0

30.0

31.1

36.3

 

Obesity, BMI > 30.0 kg/m2, %

69.2

52.9

52.9

53.9

39.5c,d

 

ap < 0.05 compared to definite MI group, Bonferroni test. bp < 0.05 compared to possible MI group, Bonferroni test. cp < 0.05 compared to left VH group, Bonferroni test, dp < 0.05 compared to left VH group, Bonferroni test. BMI body mass index, BP blood pressure, ECG electrocardiogram, HDL high-density lipoproteins, MI – myocardial infarction, LDL low-density lipoproteins, VH ventricular hypertrophy

Bold typeface of P values indicates significance

The women with definite MI had higher means of systolic and diastolic BP as compared to women with ischemia and marginal or no ECG abnormalities (Table 3). The highest level of LDL cholesterol was observed in women with ischemia. Moreover, those women had higher BMI, total cholesterol and triglycerides than women having marginal or no ECG abnormalities.

Cox regression analysis was used to calculate the independent contribution of clinically meaningful ECG abnormalities to the risk of dying from CVD and CHD when other conventional risk factors had been accounted for (Table 4). Follow up period started from the health examination date and finished on 31st of December, 2015. The mean duration of follow-up was 12.8 + 7.79 years (12.5 + 7.82 years in men and 13.1 + 7.75 years in women). In men, ischemic changes on ECG and possible MI were associated with a 2.5-fold and 4.4-fold higher risk of death from CVD as compared to men with marginal or absent of ECG abnormalities (reference group). Risk of dying from CVD was 1.51-fold higher in women with ischemia and 2.56-fold higher in women with possible MI than in reference group. A similar impact of clinically meaningful ECG abnormalities on CHD mortality was observed in men but not in women (Table 4).
Table 4

Adjusteda hazard ratios of CVD and CHD mortality by group of clinically meaningful electrocardiographic abnormalities and sex

 

CVD mortality

CHD mortality

ECG abnormality

Men n = 281

Women n = 167

Men n = 172

Women n = 96

 

HR (95% CI)

p value

HR (95% CI)

p value

HR (95% CI)

p value

HR (95% CI)

p value

Marginal abnormalities or absent

1.0

–

1.0

–

1.0

–

1.0

–

Ischemia

2.50 (1.67–3.74)

< 0.001

1.51 (1.00–2.27)

0.048

2.00 (1.14–3.51)

0.016

1.67 (0.99–2.82)

0.053

Left VH

1.65 (0.94–2.91)

0.082

1.19 (0.52–2.72)

0.686

1.58 (0.77–3.25)

0.211

1.09 (0.34–3.50)

0.885

Possible MI

4.40 (2.30–8.42)

< 0.001

2.56 (1.03–6.35)

0.042

4.83 (2.21–10.55)

< 0.001

3.04 (0.94–9.86)

0.064

 

(2.30–8.42)

 

(1.03–6.35)

 

(2.21–10.55)

 

(0.94–9.86)

 

Definite MI

1.94 (0.48–7.91)

0.355

3.75 (0.50–27.93)

0.197

2.83 (0.68–11.68)

0.151

6.81 (0.88–52.76)

0.066

a - adjusted for age, education, arterial hypertension, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, body mass index, smoking, and study number. CI confidence interval, CHD coronary heart disease, CVD cardiovascular diseases, ECG electrocardiogram, HR hazard ratio, MI myocardial infarction, VH ventricular hypertrophy. Bold typeface indicates significance

For comparison of predictive ability of Cox regression models, the dichotomized variable (any clinically meaningful ECG abnormality and absent of abnormality) was used. Risk of CVD and CHD mortality was significantly higher in men and women having any clinically meaningful ECG abnormality (Table 5). The addition of ECG abnormalities had some effect on Cox regression models performance. According to the LRT tests, the extension of the Model 1 by mentioned variable significantly improved the performance of model in both genders. A slight increase in Harrell’s C-statistic was observed, once the variable of ECG abnormalities was added to other risk factors in the models for CVD and CHD mortality. In men, the values of IDI were 1.3% (p = 0.007) for CVD mortality and 1.0% (p < 0.001) for CHD mortality, which suggests a modest improvement in discrimination of the Cox regression models when ECG abnormalities were added to the models. In women, the respective values of IDI were lower than in men. Addition of ECG abnormalities to the model adjusted for traditional CVD risk factors resulted in reclassification of 18.6% of men in CVD mortality prediction model and 25.2% of men in CHD mortality prediction model. No net reclassification improvement was observed in women.
Table 5

Comparison of models for prediction of CVD and CHD mortality without and with addition of electrocardiographic abnormalities

ECG

CVD mortality

CHD mortality

abnormalities

Men n = 281

Women n = 167

Men n = 172

Women n = 96

 

Model 1

Model 2

Model 1

Model 2

Model 1

Model 2

Model 1

Model 2

  

HR (95% CI)

 

HR (95% CI)

 

HR (95% CI)

 

HR (95% CI)

No

–

1

–

1

–

1

–

1

Yes

–

2.34 (1.72–3.19)

–

1.56 (1.09–2.24)

–

2.15 (1.44–3.22)

–

1.71 (1.07–2.73)

Harrell‘s C

0.704

0.730

0.803

0.814

0.715

0.745

0.829

0.842

LRT (p-value)

–

24.62 (< 0.001)

–

5.48 (0.019)

–

12.02 (< 0.001)

–

4.79 (0.029)

IDI (p-value)

–

0.013 (0.007)

–

0.004 (0.040)

–

0.010 (< 0.001)

–

0.004 (0.173)

NRI (p-value)

–

0.186 (0.007)

–

0.186 (0.153)

–

0.252 (0.027)

–

0.212 (0.206)

Model 1 – factors included into model: age, education, arterial hypertension, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, body mass index, smoking; Model 2 – variables of Model 1 plus ECG abnormalities

CHD coronary heart disease, CI confidence interval, CVD cardiovascular diseases, HR hazard ratio, IDI integrated discrimination improvement, LRT likelihood ratio test, NRI net reclassification index

Bold typeface indicates significance

Discussion

This study describes the trends in the prevalence of ECG abnormalities and the prognostic impact of these abnormalities on risk of death from CHD and CVD in Lithuania over a period of more than two decades. To our knowledge, our study is the first to describe trends in the prevalence and prognostic impact of ECG abnormalities coded by MC not only in Lithuania but also in all Baltic countries.

Over the study period, we observed a significant increase in the prevalence of left VH in male population. These findings might be explained by the data of our previous studies carried out during the same period showing the increasing trends in the prevalence of AH among middle-aged Lithuanian men [11]. Other investigators demonstrated that effective antihypertensive treatment might result in regression of left VH [18, 19]. In Lithuania, however, the proportion of controlled AH still remains rather low, especially among men, despite some improvement in AH management [20].

During 20 years period, the prevalence of ischemia among women decreased. The observed positive trends might be associated with a significant decrease in the prevalence of dyslipidemias and obesity in Lithuanian women between 1986 and 2006 [11]. The positive changes in lipid levels could be related to the changes in nutrition habits of Lithuanians that were more pronounced in women. Our previous study demonstrated the increase in the use of vegetable oil for cooking and replacement of butter spread with margarine, also the decrease in consumption of high fat milk [21]. Moreover, the National CVD Prevention Programme for high risk individuals was introduced in Lithuania in order to improve the control of CVD risk factors [22]. The reduced prevalence of ischemia on ECG of women was associated with decreasing trends in CVD mortality among Lithuanian women between 1985 and 2013 [11]. In men, the reduction of CVD mortality was observed only from 2008. These changes could be attributed to a combination of long-term increase in income, other socio-economic changes, improvements in health care and dietary changes.

In our study, the prevalence of ECG abnormalities, with exception of ST-T codes, was significantly higher in men than in women. Similar gender differences in the prevalence of major and minor ECG abnormalities were found in the adult population of Reykjavik and in the Hispanic Community Health Study [6, 23]. However, in the Chicago Heart Association Detection Project the prevalence rates of major ECG abnormalities were higher in women than in men, while minor ECG abnormalities were more common in men compared to women [24].

We found lower mean levels of systolic and diastolic BP, some lipids and BMI in men and women with marginal or absent ECG abnormalities as compared to individuals having ECG abnormalities. Our data is in line with the findings from other studies where the prevalence and mean levels of most CVD risk factors were higher in individuals with major and minor ECG abnormalities as compared to those without such abnormalities [25–28]. On the other hand, the prevalence of ECG abnormalities has been found higher in individuals with CVD risk factors [29].

After adjustment for the main CVD risk factors, male participants of our study with ischemia and possible MI based on ECG abnormalities had a significantly higher risk of CVD and CHD mortality as compared to men with marginal or absent ECG abnormalities. In women, the same ECG abnormalities were associated only with higher risk of CVD mortality; moreover, HRs were lower than in men. Our results are similar to those obtained in other population studies that analysed gender differences in prognostic values of ECG abnormalities and showed lower CVD mortality risk in women than in men [24, 30]. However, other authors did not find any gender differences in predicting CVD mortality risk for ECG abnormalities [31–34].

Pathological Q waves in the absence of documented MI are important cardiac abnormalities detected through ECG screening. Those patients do not receive medical treatments that could prevent adverse outcomes, including recurrent MI or CVD death [35]. Cohort studies demonstrated that Q/QS wave abnormalities (silent MI) were associated with increased risk of CHD and all-cause mortality [36–38]. Prognostic values of those ECG abnormalities have been shown to be similar to clinically documented MI.

Nonspecific ST segment and T wave abnormalities were related to CVD and CHD mortality in asymptomatic older and middle-aged persons [32, 39–41]. It was suggested that those ECG abnormalities might indicate subclinical CHD.

Several studies reported that ECG left VH was a predictor of multiple CVD outcomes (sudden cardiac death, MI, congestive heart failure and stroke) [25, 42]. According to results of the LIFE study, regression of ECG left VH during antihypertensive treatment was associated with better CVD outcomes [18]. Contrary to those findings, we did not estimate an association between left VH and mortality from CVD and CHD. Similar results were found in the study conducted in three European countries [15]. Possible explanation could be an adjustment of mortality HRs for AH which is strongly related with left VH.

Our results demonstrated that resting ECG abnormalities significantly improved the prediction of CVD and CHD mortality beyond traditional cardiovascular risk factors. In men, the addition of ECG abnormalities resulted in reclassification of 18.6 and 25.2% of participants when risk of dying from CVD and CHD was assessed. Only few studies analysed the changes in the predictive ability of Cox models after the addition of resting ECG abnormalities [12, 13]. The results of Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study (Health ABC Study) showed that 13.6% participants with minor and major ECG abnormalities were correctly reclassified when ECG abnormalities were added [39]. However, in studies carried out in Netherlands and Norway, inclusion of ECG abnormalities did not improve models performance [13, 43].

Some limitations should be considered when interpreting our findings. Only a single ECG tracing was recorded for each participant during the baseline examination. It is recognized that single ECG record, same as other single biologic measurements, could lead to underestimation of the impact of examined factors on risk due to misclassification [44]. The low prevalence of some ECG abnormalities could be another limitation of our study. A relatively small number of deaths within ECG categories may limit the power to demonstrate the association between ECG abnormalities and mortality risk. Moreover, we have no information about changes in participants’ health behaviours, biologic CVD risk factors, and ECG during observation period. These changes might have impact on risk of mortality from CVD. Finally, the response rates lower than 70% might have resulted in selection bias and potential underestimation of the prevalence of ECG abnormalities, if non-response was associated with a more adverse risk profile. However, it is unlikely that the strength of this association has changed substantially between the surveys. This assumption together with the relatively similar response rates over time minimizes the potential impact of non-response on our estimates of the trends in the prevalence of ECG abnormalities.

The strength of our study includes the large number of participants from middle-aged Lithuanian population and long-term follow up. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the trends in ECG abnormalities and impact of these abnormalities on risk of death from CHD and CVD in Lithuania and other Baltic countries. The standardized ECG procedures and carefully documented registration of death events during follow up were used. Multiple lifestyle and biological CVD risk factors were assessed using uniform collection of data. This allowed to make adjustments for a large number of potential confounding variables in the Cox models.

Conclusions

In 1986–2008, the decreasing trends in the prevalence of ischemia on ECG in women and increasing trends in the prevalence of left VH in men were observed. ECG abnormalities were associated with higher risk of CVD mortality and modestly improved the prediction of CVD mortality beyond traditional CVD risk factors. Given the wide availability, low cost and safety, the ECG might be used to improve CVD risk prediction and to identify the individuals for more intensive preventive interventions. Further studies are needed to ascertain whether ECG should be incorporated in routine screening.

Abbreviations

AH: 

Arterial hypertension

BMI: 

Body mass index

BP: 

Blood pressure

CHD: 

Coronary heart disease

CI: 

Confidence interval

CVD: 

Cardiovascular diseases

ECG: 

Electrocardiographic

HDL: 

High density lipoproteins

HR: 

Hazard ratio

ICD: 

International classification of diseases

IDI: 

Integrated discrimination improvement

LDL: 

Low density lipoproteins

LRT: 

Log-likelihood ratio

MC: 

Minnesota code

MI: 

Myocardial infarction

NRI: 

Net reclassification improvement index

SD: 

Standard deviation

VH: 

Ventricular hypertrophy

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grants from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Availability of data and materials

Information on data used in this study is available through the corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions

AT, JP, MK, DL, IM and RR developed the idea for this manuscript and the data analysis plan. GB and AT conducted literature search and provided summaries of previous research studies. DV and MK conducted the statistical analysis. AT, IM and DL wrote the first draft of the manuscript with consultation, feedback, and editing assistance by JP and RR. All authors have contributed to and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All four studies were approved by the Lithuanian Regional Bioethics Committee. All participants signed written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Cardiology, Academy of Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Sukileliu av. 15, LT-50162 Kaunas, Lithuania
(2)
Faculty of Public Health, Academy of Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
(3)
Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania

References

  1. GBD 2015 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016 8;388(10053):1459–1544.Google Scholar
  2. European Heart Network. European Cardiovascular Disease Statistics 2012. https://www.escardio.org/static_file/Escardio/Press-media/press-releases/2013/EU-cardiovascular-statistics-2012.pdf
  3. Global WHO Mortality database. WHO Mortality Database https://www.who.int/healthinfo/mortality_data/en/
  4. Zhang ZM, Prineas RJ, Eaton CB. Evaluation and comparison of the Minnesota code and Novacode for electrocardiographic Q-ST wave abnormalities for the independent prediction of incident coronary heart disease and total mortality (from the women‘s health initiative). Am J Cardiol. 2010;106:18–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Laukkanen JA, Di Angelantonio E, Khan H, Kurl S, Ronkainen K, Rautaharju P. T-wave inversion, QRS duration, and QRS/T angle as electrocardiographic predictors of the risk for sudden cardiac death. Am J Cardiol. 2014;113(7):1178–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Denes P, Garside DB, Lloyd-Jones D, Gouskova N, Soliman EZ, Ostfeld R, et al. Major and minor electrocardiographic abnormalities and their association with underlying cardiovascular disease and risk factors in Hispanics/Latinos (from the Hispanic community health study/study of Latinos). Am J Cardiol. 2013;112(10):1667–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Walsh JA 3rd, Prineas R, Daviglus ML, Ning H, Liu K, Lewis CE, et al. Prevalence of electrocardiographic abnormalities in a middle-aged, biracial population: Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study. J Electrocardiol. 2010;43(5):385.e1–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Vinyoles E, Soldevila N, Torras J, Olona N, de la Figuera M. Prognostic value of non-specific ST-T changes and left ventricular hypertrophy electrocardiographic criteria in hypertensive patients: 16-year follow-up results from the MINACOR cohort. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2015;15:24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Chou R, Arora B, Tracy D, Fu R, Walker M, Humphrey L. Screening asymptomatic adults with resting or exercise electrocardiography: a review of the evidence for the U.S. preventive services task force. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:375–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Tamosiunas A, Grazuleviciene R, Luksiene D, Dedele A, Reklaitiene R, Baceviciene M, et al. Accessibility and use of urban green spaces, and cardiovascular health: findings from a Kaunas cohort study. Environ Health. 2014;13(1):20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Tamosiunas A, Klumbiene J, Petkeviciene J, Radisauskas R, Vikhireva O, Luksiene D, Virviciute D. Trends in major risk factors and mortality from main non-communicable diseases in Lithuania, 1985-2013. BMC Public Health 2016; 4;16:717.Google Scholar
  12. Auer R, Bauer DC, Marques-Vidal P, Butler J, Min LJ, Cornuz J, et al. Association of major and minor ECG abnormalities with coronary heart disease events. JAMA 2012; 11;307(14):1497–1505.Google Scholar
  13. Groot A, Bots ML, Rutten FH, den Ruijter HM, Numans ME, Vaartjes I. Measurement of ECG abnormalities and cardiovascular risk classification: a cohort study of primary care patients in the Netherlands. Br J Gen Pract. 2015;65(630):e1–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Prineas RJ, Crow RS, Blackburn H. The trends in the prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation, its treatment with anticoagulation and predictors of such treatment in UK primary care.Code manual of electrocardiographic findings. London: John Wright; 1982.Google Scholar
  15. Menotti A, Mulder I, Kromhout D, Nissinen A, Feskens EJ, Giampaoli S. The association of silent electrocardiographic findings with coronary deaths among elderly men in three European countries. The FINE study. Acta Cardiol. 2001;56(1):27–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Pencina MJ, D'Agostino RB Sr, Steyerberg EW. Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers. Stat Med 2011;15;30(1):11–21.Google Scholar
  17. Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996;15:361–87.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Bang CN, Devereux RB, Okin PM. Regression of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy or strain is associated with lower incidence of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients independent of blood pressure reduction - a LIFE review. J Electrocardiol. 2014;47(5):630–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Okin PM, Devereux RB, Jern S, Kjeldsen SE, Julius S, Nieminen MS, et al. Regression of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophyduring antihypertensive treatment and the prediction of major cardiovascular events. JAMA. 2004;292(19):2343–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Reklaitiene R, Tamosiunas A, Virviciute D, Baceviciene M, Luksiene D. Trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension, and the risk of mortality among middle-aged Lithuanian urban population in 1983-2009. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2012;12:68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Kriaucioniene V, Klumbiene J, Petkeviciene J, Sakyte E. Time trends in social differences in nutrition habits of a Lithuanian population: 1994-2010. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:218. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-218.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Order of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Lithuania, No. V-913. https://www.e-tar.lt/portal/en/legalActEditions/TAR.989A59214850
  23. Stefansdottir H, Aspelund T, Gudnason V, Arnar DO. Trends in the incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation in Iceland and future projections. Europace. 2011;13(8):1110–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Liao YL, Liu KA, Dyer A, Schoenberger JA, Shekelle RB, Colette P, et al. J Major and minor electrocardiographic abnormalities and risk of death from coronary heart disease, cardiovascular diseases and all causes in men and women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;12(6):1494–500.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Desai CS, Ning H, Lloyd-Jones DM. Competing cardiovascular outcomes associated with electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Heart. 2012;98(4):330–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Queen SR, Smulevitz B, Rentfro AR, Vatcheva KP, Kim H, McPherson DD, et al. Electrocardiographic abnormalities among Mexican Americans: correlations with diabetes, obesity, and the metabolic syndrome. World J Cardiovasc Dis. 2012;2(2):50–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Badheka AO, Rathod A, Marzouka GR, Patel N, Bokhari SS, Moscucci M, et al. Isolated nonspecific ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities in a cross-sectional United States population and mortality (from NHANES III). Am J Cardiol. 2012;110(4):521–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. O'Neal WT, Shah AJ, Efird JT, Rautaharju PM, Soliman EZ. Subclinical myocardial injury identified by cardiac infarction/injury score and the risk of mortality in men and women free of cardiovascular disease. Am J Cardiol. 2014;114(7):1018–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Lehtonen AO, Puukka P, Varis J, Porthan K, Tikkanen JT, Nieminen MS, et al. Prevalence and prognosis of ECG abnormalities in normotensive and hypertensive individuals. J Hypertens. 2016;34(5):959–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Menotti A, Seccareccia F. Electrocardiographic Minnesota code findings predicting short-term mortality in asymptomatic subjects. The Italian RIFLE pooling project (risk factors and life expectancy). G Ital Cardiol. 1997;27(1):40–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. De Bacquer D, De Backer G, Kornitzer M, Blackburn H. Prognostic value of ECG findings for total, cardiovascular disease, and coronary heart disease death in men and women. Heart. 1998;80(6):570–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Greenland P, Xie X, Liu K, Colangelo L, Liao Y, Daviglus ML, et al. Impact of minor electrocardiographic ST-segment and/or T-wave abnormalities on cardiovascular mortality during long-term follow-up. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91(9):1068–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Rautaharju PM, Ge S, Nelson JC, Marino Larsen EK, Psaty BM, et al. Comparison of mortality risk for electrocardiographic abnormalities in men and women with and without coronary heart disease (from the cardiovascular health study). Am J Cardiol. 2006;97(3):309–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhang ZM, Prineas RJ, Case D, Psaty BM, Suzuki T, Burke GL. Gender differences between the Minnesota code and Novacode electrocardiographic prognostication of coronary heart disease in the cardiovascular health study. Am J Cardiol. 2011;107(6):817–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Pride YB, Piccirillo BJ, Gibson CM. Prevalence, consequences, and implications for clinical trials of unrecognized myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2013;111:914–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Sheifer SE, Gersh BJ, Yanez ND III, Ades PA, Burke GL, Manolio TA. Prevalence, predisposing factors, and prognosis of clinically unrecognized myocardial infarction in the elderly. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:119–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. de Torbal A, Boersma E, Kors JA, van Herpen G, Deckers JW, van der Kuip DA, et al. Incidence of recognized and unrecognized myocardial infarction in men and women aged 55 and older: the Rotterdam study. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:729–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang ZM, Rautaharju PM, Prineas RJ, Rodriguez CJ, Loehr L, Rosamond WD, et al. Race and sex differences in the incidence and prognostic significance of silent myocardial infarction in the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study. Circulation. 2016;133(22):2141–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Kumar A, Lloyd-Jones DM. Clinical significance of minor nonspecific ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities in asymptomatic subjects: a systematic review. Cardiol Rev. 2007;15(3):133–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Sawai T, Imano H, Muraki I, Hayama-Terada M, Shimizu Y, Cui R, et al. Changes in ischaemic ECG abnormalities and subsequent risk of cardiovascular disease. Heart Asia. 2017;9(1):36–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Aro AL, Anttonen O, Tikkanen JT, Junttila MJ, Kerola T, Rissanen HA, et al. Prevalence and prognostic significance of T-wave inversions in right precordial leads of a 12-lead electrocardiogram in the middle-aged subjects. Circulation. 2012;125(21):2572–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Levy D, Salomon M, D'Agostino RB, Belanger AJ, Kannel WB. Prognostic implications of baseline electrocardiographic features and their serial changes in subjects with left ventricular hypertrophy. Circulation. 1994;90:1786–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Øhrn AM, Schirmer H, Njølstad I, Mathiesen EB, Eggen AE, Løchen ML, et al. Electrocardiographic unrecognized myocardial infarction does not improve prediction of cardiovascular events beyond traditional risk factors. The Tromsø study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018;25(1):78–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Daviglus ML, Liao Y, Greenland P, Dyer AR, Liu K, Xie X, et al. Association of nonspecific minor ST-T abnormalities with cardiovascular mortality: the Chicago Western electric study. JAMA. 1999;281(6):530–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2019

Advertisement

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2261

Contact us