Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Gender differences of aortic wave reflection and influence of menopause on central blood pressure in patients with arterial hypertension

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders201818:123

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-018-0855-8

Received: 4 February 2018

Accepted: 6 June 2018

Published: 19 June 2018

Abstract

Background

Evidences suggest that central hemodynamics indexes are independent predictors of future cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Multiple factors have been pointed to have potential influence on central aortic function: height, heart rate, left ventricular ejection duration and blood pressure level. Data related to the influence of gender and postmenopausal status on aortic waveform reflection is scarce. We aim to evaluate the impact of gender and menopause on central blood pressure of hypertensive patients.

Methods

In a cross sectional study 122 hypertensive patients (52 men and 70 women) were studied. Hypertension was defined as blood pressure (BP) levels ≥140/90 mmHg or use of antihypertensive drugs. Central arterial pressure, augmentation index (AIx) and augmentation index normalized to 75 bpm (AIx75) were obtained using applanation tonometry. Menopause and postmenopause history were accessed by a direct series of questions. Postmenopause was defined as at least one year since last menstruation. Patients were paired by age, gender and menopausal status, and the data were compared considering gender and menopausal status.

Results

Height and weight were significantly lower in women than in men at the same age. Conversely, AIx (32.7 ± 9.8% vs. 20.1 ± 11.7%, p < 0.01), AIx75 (29.6 ± 6.7% vs. 18.3 ± 9.4%, p < 0.01) and central systolic blood pressure (136 ± 30 vs. 125 ± 23 mmHg, p = 0.03) were higher in women than men. The menopausal women (mean age of menopause = 48 years) had the worst indexes of aortic wave reflection, compared to men at the same age and younger women.

Conclusion

Hypertensive women had both higher reflected aortic pressure waveform and central blood pressure indexes than hypertensive men, and these findings were worsened by the menopausal status.

Keywords

Arterial hypertensionMenopausePulse wave reflectionCentral aortic blood pressureAugmentation indexArterial stiffness

Background

Evidences suggest that central hemodynamics indexes are independent predictors of future cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Central pressures do not exactly correspond to brachial pressures because of pressure pulse amplification from the aorta to the peripheral arteries [1]. Compared to peripheral pressure, central blood pressure has been shown to be a better predictor of cardiovascular disease and holds a prognostic value for both cardiovascular fatal and non fatal events. The augmentation index (AIx) is a variable obtained by analysis of pulse waves acquired by applanation tonometry, and basically reproduces an increase of the pressure waveform resulting from backward reflected wave from periphery to the aorta. It is shown that AIx can predict clinical events independently of peripheral pressures [1]. Multiple factors have potential influence on large arteries functional properties: height [2, 3], heart rate [3], left ventricular ejection duration [4] and blood pressure level [3, 5]. However, information about the influence of gender and postmenopausal period on these properties is scarce. We aimed to evaluate the influence of gender and menopause status on central aortic pressure, aortic wave reflection and carotid artery properties in hypertensive patients.

Methods

Subjects

We enrolled 122 (52 men and 70 women) patients from approximately 468 individuals screened for this cross-sectional study. Patients from the Hypertension Unit of the Heart Institute of University of São Paulo (Brazil) were consecutively recruited from June 2013 to June 2015.

The local ethics committee approved the protocol, and all participants agreed and signed the Informed Consent Form. The vascular evaluation was performed in the clinical research laboratory at the Heart Institute, room temperature controlled between 22 °C and 24 °C.

Menopause and postmenopause history were assessed by a direct series of questions (1. Do you still have menstrual period? 2. If not, when did it stop? 3. How old were you when your menstruation period stopped?). Postmenopause was defined as at least one year since last menstruation [6]. Because the minimum age reported for the menstruation cessation was 48 years old, this was stablished as the cutoff value to classify the women according to the menopause status. Based on this cutoff value for women and in order to compare them to men of the same age group, the sample was divided into 4 groups: group 1 (young men, ≤48y), group 2 (young women, ≤48y), group 3 (older men, >48y) and group 4 (older women, >48y). Patients with the following conditions were not included: age less than 18 years old, cerebrovascular disease (previous stroke or transient ischemic attack), diabetes mellitus, smoking, arrhythmias, heart failure with left ventricular dysfunction and known neurodegenerative or psychiatric disease.

Measurements and procedures

Blood pressure measurements

Brachial systolic and diastolic blood pressure was measured using the Omron automatic device (HEM-705 CP model), on the arm with the highest BP, after 5 min of resting. The mean of 3 measurements with a 1-min interval between each one was obtained for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) according the recommendations of the VI Brazilian Guidelines on Hypertension. Hypertension was defined by SBP ≥ 140 mmHg and/or DBP ≥ 90 or use of antihypertensive drugs [7].

Pulse wave analysis

The assessment of arterial pulse wave components was performed by a non-invasive applanation tonometry of radial artery a SphygmoCor device (AtCor Medical, Sydney, Australia). Radial artery pressure waveforms were recorded in the left wrist using a pencil-type high-fidelity micromanometer (Millar Instruments, Houston, Texas). The reliability and reproducibility of this technique has been previously reported [810]. The radial artery pressure curve was calibrated using brachial blood pressure. From the pulse wave analysis of the aortic pressure waveform the following variables were obtained: aortic pressures, aortic augmentation index (AIx), AIx adjusted for a heart rate of 75 beats per minute (AIx75) [11]. Aortic pressure waveform and augmentation index (AIx) were calculated by using the transfer function of SphygmoCor device. Aortic AIx was calculated as follows: AIx = ∆P/PP, ∆P=P2-P1 (P2: peak systolic pressure, P1: inflection point that indicates the beginning upstroke of the reflected pressure wave). Only high-quality recordings, defined as an in-device quality index of > 80% were accepted for analysis.

Carotid artery properties

Carotid measurements were obtained in the right common carotid artery by a 7.5 MHz linear array probe 1 cm below the bifurcation at the site of distal wall. Carotid diameter and distension were recorded using a high-resolution echo-tracking system (Wall Track, Pie Medical System, Maastricht, Netherlands), which is based on a radio-frequency signal analysis previously validated and used in different clinical studies [12, 13]. Briefly, a radio-frequency signal of 4–8 cardiac cycles was recorded, digitized, and temporarily stored. The signals corresponding to the proximal and distal walls were defined and the posterior wall thickness and the internal diameter were measured by positioning markers in the respective posterior and anterior wall signal. The system computed the successive values of internal end-diastolic diameter and stroke change in diameter and digitized the displacement waveform [12]. Carotid distension was automatically calculated as the systolic-diastolic variation.

Statistical analyses

Data were analyzed with SPSS software (SPSS for Windows 20.0, SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). Data distribution was determined using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Continuous variables are presented as mean and standard deviation and were analyzed by the independent-samples t test and Mann–Whitney U test, when suitable. Categorical data are presented as percentages and analyzed by Chi-square test. An ANOVA test was used with Bonferroni post hoc comparisons to analyze differences between gender and age groups. The AIx, AIx 75 and brachial SBP were adjusted for height and weight and analyzed by an ANCOVA test. Pearson’s coefficient was used for bivariate correlations. Statistical significance was set at 5%.

Results

In a cross-sectional study we evaluated 122 hypertensive patients. The average duration of hypertension was 9.99 ± 7.9 years and 47.1% had BP levels under control (< 140/90 mmHg). The Fig. 1 shows the flow chart of the study and the main exclusion reasons. Clinical characteristics according the gender are described in Table 1. Height and weight were significantly lower in women than in men at the same age. Conversely, some variables values were significantly higher in women than in men, such as: AIx (32.7 ± 9.8% vs. 20.1 ± 11.7%, p < 0.01), AIx75 (29.6 ± 6.7% vs. 18.3 ± 9.4%, p < 0.01) and central systolic blood pressure (136 ± 30 vs. 125 ± 23 mmHg, p = 0.03), respectively. There was a negative correlation between radial AIx (r = − 0.48, p < 0.01) and AIx75 (r = − 0.55, p < 0.01) with the height of patients.
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Flow chart of the study population

Figure 2
Fig. 2

Values of aortic augmentation index (AIx) and AIx adjusted for a heart rate of 75 (AIx75) according to respective group. (m:male; f:female). a) group 1 vs. group 2 and group 4 (p < 0.01); b) group 2 vs. group 1 and group 4 (p < 0.01); c) group 3 vs. group 4 (p < 0.01); d) group 4 vs. all (p < 0.01); e) group 1 vs. all (p < 0.01);f) group 3 vs. group 1 and group 4 (p < 0.01)

Table 1

Clinical characteristics distributed by gender

Variables

men (n = 52)

women (n = 70)

p

Age (years)

49.7 ± 10.5

52.6 ± 11.0

0.15

SBP (mmHg)

137 ± 20

145 ± 26

0.06

DBP (mmHg)

86 ± 12

87 ± 15

0.60

HR

71.4 ± 13

68.2 ± 11.9

0.18

Weight (kg)

85.3 ± 11.4

76.2 ± 14.0

< 0.01*

Height (m)

1.72 ± 0.08

1.59 ± 0.06

< 0.01*

Hypertension time (years)

9.4 ± 7.1

10.8 ± 8.6

0.35

AIx (%)

20.1 ± 11.7

32.7 ± 9.8

< 0.01*

AIx75 (%)

18.3 ± 9.4

29.6 ± 6.7

< 0.01*

C_SP (mmHg)

125 ± 23

136 ± 30

0.03*

C_DP (mmHg)

88 ± 15

88 ± 16

0.90

SPB systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, HR heart rate, AIx aortic augmentation index, AIx75 aortic augmentation index adjusted for heart rate of 75, C_SP central systolic blood pressure, C_DP central diastolic blood pressure. (*) Differences in AIx (22.2 ± 12.7 vs 30.9 ± 12.2) and AIx75 (20.5 ± 9.41 vs 27.7 ± 8.12) persist even after adjustments for: height 1.64 m, weight 80.1Kg, SBP 142 mmHg p < 0.01

Differences in AIx (22.2 ± 12.7 vs. 30.9 ± 12.2, p < 0.01) and AIx75 (20.5 ± 9.41 vs. 27.7 ± 8.12, p < 0.01) between women and men were maintained even after adjustment for height, weight and SBP. There were no differences among the groups according to hypertension duration and blood pressure level.

Menopause was registered in 70% of women. Young men (group 1) had lower AIx than both young (group 2) and older women (group 4) (16.5 ± 9.93 vs. 27.3 ± 8.74, 34.9 ± 9.77, p < 0.01) and the lowest AIx75 (14.5 ± 6.98) than all other groups respectively: young women (25.4 ± 7.87), older men (21.8 ± 8.53) and older women (30.9 ± 6.57). Conversely, young women (group 2) had both AIx and AIx75 comparable to older men group (AIx: 27.3 ± 8.74 vs. 23.2 ± 12.4, p = 0.9 and AIx75: 25.4 ± 7.87 vs. 21.8 ± 7.87, p = 0.7, respectively). When all groups were compared, the menopausal women (group 4) had the worst indexes of aortic wave reflection (AIx: 34.9 ± 9.77 (group 4) vs. 16.5 ± 9.93 (group 1), 27.3 ± 8.74 (group 2), 23.2 ± 12.4 (group 3), p = < 0.01 and AIx75: 30.9 ± 6.57 (group 4) vs. 14.5 ± 6.98 (group 1), 25.4 ± 7.87 (group 2), 21.8 ± 8.53 (group 3), p = < 0.01) (Fig. 2). There were no differences among groups according to values of brachial blood pressure (SBP p = 0.3; DBP p = 0.6).

Young women (group 2) had the lowest carotid diameter (6.68 ± 0.74 vs. 7.37 ± 0.69 (group 1), 7.49 ± 0.63 (group 3), 7.38 ± 0.92 (group 4), p < 0.01) (Fig. 3). Younger men and women groups (group 1: 6.12 ± 2.62 and group 2: 5.71 ± 1.91) had higher carotid distention than their older pairs (group 3: 4.01 ± 1.85 and group 4: 4.41 ± 1.13, p < 0.01). (Fig. 3).
Figure 3
Fig. 3

Values of carotid diameter and distention according to respective group. (m:male; f:female). a) group 1 vs. group 3 and group 4 (p < 0.01);b) group 2 vs. all (p < 0.01);c) group 2 vs. group 3 and group 4

Concerning the use of antihypertensive drugs that could possibly interfere in central aortic pressures, including beta-blockers, no significant differences were observed among the four groups.

Discussion

The main finding of our study is that indexes related to an increase of wave reflection, radial AIx and AIx75, were higher in women than in men with hypertension, even after adjustments for the main recognized variables related to reflected waves as body height, weight and brachial SBP. Furthermore, postmenopausal women showed the highest indexes, compared to men at the same age or younger women.

Arterial wave reflection originates from every branching of arterial vessels. The aortic length matches with body height, thus arterial wave reflection occurs later in taller individuals [14, 15]. The height is one of the possible variables that could explain the elevated values of augmentation index in women compared to men in our population, because on average women are shorter than men. Women were on average 13 cm shorter than men in our sample, but the differences between men and women in AIx and AIx75 persisted even after adjustment for height. Moreover, there was a negative correlation between AIx and height, and there were no differences on blood pressure or on age that could explain the high values of Alx and AIx75 in women compared to men.

Gatzka et al. [16] studied elderly untreated hypertensives including 104 pairs of men and women with identical body height. The authors demonstrated that arterial wave reflection occurred earlier during systole in women than in men with the same height. The study also showed that women had more reduced arterial diameter and an increased arterial stiffness when compared to height-matched men, which cause the reflected wave to travel faster and arrive in central arteries earlier with greater amplitude and duration. In our study, although women had lower height than men at the same age, AIx, AIx75 and central systolic BP were higher, related probably to a faster reflected wave resulting in an increased augmentation index.

It has been demonstrated an increase in left ventricle pulsatile afterload [17] and changes in central (carotid) arterial pressure waveform [18] with aging, due to aorta stiffening. In our study, young women had smaller carotid diameter than other groups, thus resulting in an earlier return of the reflected arterial wave and greater augmentation index than men at the same age. Two studies had shown that women had smaller diameter and stiffer arteries which increased pulse wave velocity, resulting in an earlier return of the reflected arterial wave, an increased pulse pressure, and greater augmentation index [16, 19].

Evidence have shown that menopause has a negative influence on atherosclerotic risk factors [20] and amplifies the age-dependent increase in arterial stiffness [21]. Menopause was present in a high percentage (70%) of women in our sample. Zaydun G et al. [22] have suggested that, in the early postmenopausal phase, estrogen deficiency may increase the age-related arterial stiffness. Although studies have demonstrated an association between age and arterial stiffness, many studies did not investigate the prevalence of the menopause and also did not evaluate arterial stiffness in a narrow range of age (such as postmenopausal period) [23, 24]. Furthermore, there were no difference on BP and age and even after adjusting for height and weight, the menopausal women group still showed the highest values of AIx and AIx75, suggesting a possible influence of menopause on arterial stiffness.

Limitations

The cross-sectional nature of this trial does not allow us to evaluate whether menopause has a direct role on aortic wave reflection and central blood pressure. Also, the patients were not submitted to echocardiogram, so correlations between left ventricular function and reflection indexes were not possible to evaluate. We did not have information about hormone replacement in postmenopausal women. Our study was carried out in a selected group of patients with hypertension referred to a tertiary hospital, limiting the application of our findings to other populations.

Conclusion

Hypertensive women had an increased reflected aortic pressure waveform and a higher central blood pressure than men at same age. Postmenopausal hypertensive women had the highest values of indexes related to increased wave reflection. These findings highlight the influence of gender and the possible role of menopause on arterial stiffness.

Abbreviations

AIx: 

Augmentation index

AIx75: 

Alx adjusted for a heart rate of 75

BP: 

Blood pressure

CV: 

Cardiovascular

DBP: 

Diastolic blood pressure

SBP: 

Systolic blood pressure

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We appreciate Drs. Michel Machado, Monica Yassuda, Natalia Moraes, Claudia Memoria, Ricardo Nitrini, Edson Bor-Seng-Shu and Ana Paula Gonçalves for their valuable contributions.

Availability of data and materials

The data sets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

Study concepts, Study design: VACH, HCSM, ARKS, LAB; Data acquisition: VACH, HCSM, TAM; Data analysis, Statistical analysis: VACH, HCSM, TAM; All authors have read and understand manuscript; all authors approved the content of the study in manuscript to be published.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures were performed in accordance with protocol approved by the Ethics Committee of University of São Paulo Medical School and all participants gave written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Heart Institute (Incor), Hypertension Unit, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
(2)
Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Agostinho Neto University, Luanda, Angola
(3)
Heart Institute (Incor), Cardiovascular Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology Unit, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil

References

  1. Vlachopoulos C, Aznaouridis K, O'Rourke MF, Safar ME, Baou K, Stefanadis C. Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with central haemodynamics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(15):1865–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. London GM, Guerin AP, Pannier BM, Marchais SJ, Metivier F. Body height as a determinant of carotid pulse contour in humans. J Hypertens Suppl. 1992;10(6):S93–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hayward CS, Kelly RP. Gender-related differences in the central arterial pressure waveform. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30(7):1863–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Davies JI, Struthers AD. Pulse wave analysis and pulse wave velocity: a critical review of their strengths and weaknesses. J Hypertens. 2003;21(3):463–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cameron JD, McGrath BP, Dart AM. Use of radial artery applanation tonometry and a generalized transfer function to determine aortic pressure augmentation in subjects with treated hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32(5):1214–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gracia CR, Sammel MD, Freeman EW, Lin H, Langan E, Kapoor S, Nelson DB. Defining menopause status: creation of a new definition to identify the early changes of the menopausal transition. Menopause. 2005;12(2):128–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia, Sociedade Brasileira de Hipertensão, Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia. VI Brazilian guidelines on hypertension. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2010;95:1–51.Google Scholar
  8. Pauca AL, O'Rourke MF, Kon ND. Prospective evaluation of a method for estimating ascending aortic pressure from the radial artery pressure waveform. Hypertension. 2001;38(4):932–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen CH, Ting CT, Nussbacher A, Nevo E, Kass DA, Pak P, Wang SP, Chang MS, Yin FC. Validation of carotid artery tonometry as a means of estimating augmentation index of ascending aortic pressure. Hypertension. 1996;27(2):168–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Wilkinson IB, Fuchs SA, Jansen IM, Spratt JC, Murray GD, Cockcroft JR, Webb DJ. Reproducibility of pulse wave velocity and augmentation index measured by pulse wave analysis. J Hypertens. 1998;16(12 Pt 2):2079–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Casey DP, Curry TB, Joyner MJ, Charkoudian N, Hart EC. Relationship between muscle sympathetic nerve activity and aortic wave reflection characteristics in young men and women. Hypertension. 2011;57(3):421–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Drager LF, Bortolotto LA, Maki-Nunes C, Trombetta IC, Alves MJ, Fraga RF, Negrão CE, Krieger EM, Lorenzi-Filho G. The incremental role of obstructive sleep apnoea on markers of atherosclerosis in patients with metabolic syndrome. Atherosclerosis. 2010;208(2):490–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Drager LF, Bortolotto LA, Krieger EM, Lorenzi-Filho G. Additive effects of obstructive sleep apnea and hypertension on early markers of carotid atherosclerosis. Hypertension. 2009;53(1):64–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kohara K, Jiang Y, Igase M, Hiwada K. Effect of reflection of arterial pressure on carotid circulation in essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 1999;12(10 Pt 1):1015–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Smulyan H, Marchais SJ, Pannier B, Guerin AP, Safar ME, London GM. Influence of body height on pulsatile arterial hemodynamic data. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31(5):1103–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gatzka CD, Kingwell BA, Cameron JD, Berry KL, Liang YL, Dewar EM, Reid CM, Jennings GL, Dart AM. Gender differences in the timing of arterial wave reflection beyond differences in body height. J Hypertens. 2001;19(12):2197–203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Nichols WW, O'Rourke MF, Avolio AP, Yaginuma T, Murgo JP, Pepine CJ, Conti CR. Effects of age on ventricular vascular coupling. Am J Cardiol. 1985;55:1179–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Freis ED, Heath WC, Luchsinger PC, Snell RE. Changes in the carotid pulse which occur with age and hypertension. Am Heart J. 1966;71:757–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Yasmin BMJ. Similarities and differences between augmentation index and pulse wave velocity in the assessment of arterial stiffness. QJM. 1999;92(10):595–600.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Do KA, Green A, Guthrie JR, Dudley EC, Burger HG, Dennerstein L. Longitudinal study of risk factors for coronary heart disease across the menopausal transition. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151(6):584–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Takahashi K, Miura S, Mori-Abe A, Kawagoe J, Takata K, Ohmichi M, Kurachi H. Impact of menopause on the augmentation of arterial stiffness with aging. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 2005;60(3):162–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Zaydun G, Tomiyama H, Hashimoto H, Arai T, Koji Y, Yambe M, Motobe K, Hori S, Yamashina A. Menopause is an independent factor augmenting the age-related increase in arterial stiffness in the early postmenopausal phase. Atherosclerosis. 2006;184(1):137–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mackey RH, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Vaitkevicius PV, Sakkinen PA, Lyles MF, Spurgeon HA, Lakatta EG, Kuller LH. Correlates of aortic stiffness in elderly individuals: a subgroup of the cardiovascular health study. Am J Hypertens. 2002;15(1 Pt 1):16–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mitchell GF, Parise H, Benjamin EJ, Larson MG, Keyes MJ, Vita JA, Vasan RS, Levy D. Changes in arterial stiffness and wave reflection with advancing age in healthy men and women: the Framingham heart study. Hypertension. 2004;43(6):1239–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement