Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Prevalence of arterial hypertension in the Krasnoyarsk Krai (Siberia, Russia)

BMC Cardiovascular DisordersBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:138

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-017-0559-5

Received: 10 March 2017

Accepted: 8 May 2017

Published: 26 May 2017

Abstract

Background

To estimate the prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of arterial hypertension among adult inhabitants of Krasnoyarsk Krai using the data from Russian multicenter epidemiological study ESSE-RF (Epidemiological Survey of cardiovascular diSEases in different regions of the Russian Federation).

Methods

The study included 1603 subjects 25 to 64 years old selected by means of systemic multistage stratified randomization among urban and rural inhabitants of Krasnoyarsk Krai recruited between February 2014 and June 2014. Office blood pressure (BP) was measured twice with “Omron” automated BP device on the right arm in the sitting position in presence of medical personnel. Arterial hypertension (HTN) was defined as systolic BP of at least 140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP of at least 90 mmHg or self-reported previous elevated BP registration or use of antihypertensive treatment. Treatment efficacy was defined as percentage of patients achieved the target BP level among those who received antihypertensive medications, and HTN control as percentage of people achieved the target BP level among all hypertensives.

Results

The gender distribution was 652 males (39.4%) and 951 females (60.6%). The average level of systolic BP was 133.4 ± 0.5 mmHg, diastolic BP – 82.9 ± 0.3 mmHg. The average prevalence of HTN was estimated at 49.4% and appeared to be higher than similar parameter based on the data of 10 regions from the ESSE-RF study (44%). The average prevalence of HTN was estimated at 56.3% in males and 43.7% in females. The HTN prevalence in rural community was significantly higher in comparison with urban community (63.4 ± 2.4 vs. 44.2 ± 1.5%, p < 0.01). The average rate of HTN awareness in Krasnoyarsk Krai was 77.9% (average Russian value from ESSE-RF study was 73.1%). The average use of antihypertensive treatment, its efficacy and HTN control in Krasnoyarsk Krai were estimated at 59.5%, 31.6% and 18.8%, respectively.

Conclusions

Estimated prevalence of HTN in Krasnoyarsk Krai is higher than the average Russian parameter. The average HTN prevalence among men is higher than in women. The rural inhabitants are more likely to have hypertension compared with urban inhabitants. Despite high levels of HTN awareness and antihypertensive medication intake, the antihypertensive treatment efficacy in Krasnoyarsk Krai appeared to be lower in comparison with average Russian ESSE-RF values.

Keywords

Arterial hypertension Prevalence Epidemiological study ESSE-RF

Background

Arterial hypertension (HTN) is the most important cardiovascular risk factor. According to World Health Organization experts, high blood pressure (BP) caused about 9.4 million deaths and 162 million years of life lost worldwide in 2010. HTN is also responsible for 50% of cases of coronary heart disease, stroke and heart failure, 18% of all deaths and 40% of deaths among patients with diabetes mellitus [1]. Costs for HTN and HTN-associated diseases treatment can reach 25% of all costs of healthcare systems in Eastern European countries [1].

Approximately 40% of adults aged 25 and over have HTN. By the age of 80 the rate of people suffering from HTN can reach 90% [1].

While prevalence of HTN remains relatively stable in highly developed countries (i.e. in the USA it stayed approximately 29% for 9 years from 2003 to 2012 [2]), in developing countries, low and middle income countries (such as India, Pakistan, Brazil, Argentina or China) increasing amount of people with hypertension is becoming a significant social and economic issue [3].

During the prospective study in Iran (median follow-up of 9.6 years), they revealed increasing incidence of isolated systolic and isolated diastolic hypertension (about 0.5% and 1% per year, respectively) [4].

In South Korea, HTN prevalence elevation was also registered from 1998 to 2012 [5].

Few data exist on gender influence on HTN prevalence. Particularly, higher HTN prevalence in males compared to females has been revealed in Nepal [6]. Researchers from Iran showed that females have significantly lower risk of developing hypertension [4]. The study from Barbados suggests however that smoking, insufficient physical activity, obesity and excessive alcohol intake often depend on gender, but there is no significant dependence between gender and high BP [7].

Some studies [8, 9] have demonstrated differences between urban and rural population in prevalence, awareness, treatment efficacy and control of HTN. In rural population prevalence of HTN often appears higher, while awareness, treatment efficacy and control of HTN are usually lower than in urban population.

The purpose of the study was to estimate HTN prevalence and awareness, parameters of treatment with antihypertensives, and BP control in population of Krasnoyarsk city and Beryozovsky District of Krasnoyarsk Krai within the scope of the Russian multicenter study ESSE-RF.

Methods

A total of 1603 people aged 25–64 from the population served by four outpatient clinics of Krasnoyarsk and Beryozovka territorial hospital were enrolled into the study by means of systematic stratified multistage randomization [10]. After informed consent signing all participants of the study filled in a detailed questionnaire and underwent office BP measurement. The questionnaire consisted of 12 modules based on adapted international methods and included questions on presence of hypertension, disease awareness and antihypertensive medication.

BP level was measured twice within 2–3 min after a 5-min rest with Omron automated BP monitor on the patient’s right arm in the presence of medical personnel. HTN was diagnosed if measured systolic BP (SBP) was higher than 140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP (DBP) higher than 90 mmHg, and if the questionnaire revealed that the patient had ever had high BP and/or took antihypertensive medications.

Treatment efficacy was calculated as a percentage of patients that reached target BP levels among patients who took antihypertensive medications. BP control was calculated as a percentage of patients with target BP levels among all patients with hypertension.

Statistical calculations were performed with IBM SPSS v 22 and LibreOffice Calc v 5. With Lilliefors test, we found numeric parameters distributions not normal (null-hypothesis rejected; p < 0.001) and described them as median (25%-quartile; 75%-quartile). Nominal parameters described as percentage (%) ± 95% confidence interval (CI). Group disparities were checked for significance with Mann-Whithey and Kruskal-Wallis test for numeric parameters and Chi-square test for nominal parameters. We considered differences significant at p ≤ 0.01.

Results

Our sample of Krasnoyarsk Krai population included 652 males (39.4%) and 951 females (60.6%) with SBP distributed as 131.0 (119.0; 144.5) mmHg and DBP as 82.0 (74.5; 90.5) mmHg. These figures are slightly higher in comparison with averages all over Russia according to the ESSE-RF study (average 130.7 ± 0.10 and 81.6 ± 0.50 mmHg respectively) [11]. SBP and DBP in males (137.0 (125.0; 148.0) and 84.5 (76.5; 91.5) mmHg respectively) appeared significantly higher (H0 rejected, p = 0.01) than in females (126.5 (115.0; 141.5) and 81.0 (72.5; 89.5) mmHg, respectively); for details and age dependencies see Table 1.
Table 1

BP levels, HTN prevalence and HTN awareness depending on age and gender

Age group (years)

Male

Female

Total

Levels of Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) in different age groups (mmHg, median (Q25; Q75)

 

SBP

Q25; Q75

SBP

Q25; Q75

SBP

Q25; Q75

25–34

127.5

119.5; 137.5

116.0

109.0; 125.0

120.5

111.5; 130.5

35–44

134.3

124.3; 142.8

121.5

113.0; 132.0

126.0

116.0; 138.5

45–54

140.0

129.5; 148.5

130.5

118.5; 142.5

134.0

122.0; 145.0

55–64

144.0

135.0; 158.5

141.0

130.0; 156.5

142.5

132.5; 157.0

Levels of Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) in different age groups (mmHg, median (Q25; Q75)

 

DBP

Q25; Q75

DBP

Q25; Q75

DBP

Q25; Q75

25–34

78.5

73.0; 84.5

74.5

69.0; 81.0

76.0

71.0; 82.5

35–44

83.5

76.3; 91.0

79.5

72.5; 88.0

82.0

74.0; 89.0

45–54

88.5

81.5; 93.0

82.0

72.5; 90.0

85.0

76.0; 91.5

55–64

88.0

80.5; 95.5

86.0

80.0; 94.0

87.0

80.0; 95.0

Hypertension prevalence in different age groups (% ± 95% CI)

 

% (n)

95% CI

% (n)

95% CI

% (n)

95% CI

25–34

27.0 (n = 44)

6.86

10.8 (n = 25)

3.92

17.5 (n = 69)

3.72

35–44

43.3 (n = 52)

8.82

32.1 (n = 62)

6.66

36.4 (n = 114)

5.29

45–54

71.0 (n = 103)

7.39

53.0 (n = 134)

6.15

59.5 (n = 237)

4.90

55–64

79.9 (n = 143)

5.88

76.7 (n = 198)

5.15

78.0 (n = 341)

3.92

Hypertension awareness in different age groups (% ± 95% CI)

 

% (n)

95% CI

% (n)

95% CI

% (n)

95% CI

25–34

70.5 (n = 31)

6.27

76.0 (n = 19)

4.51

72.5 (n = 50)

10.58

35–44

82.7 (n = 43)

7.25

79.0 (n = 49)

5.49

80.7 (n = 92)

7.25

45–54

73.8 (n = 76)

6.86

79.9 (n = 107)

4.70

77.2 (n = 183)

5.29

55–64

80.4 (n = 115)

5.88

77.3 (n = 153)

5.10

78.6 (n = 268)

4.31

A significant (H0 rejected, p = 0.01) trend of increasing SBP with increasing age was revealed both in males and females, while DBP slowed its growth with increasing age, and did not grow at all in males aged 55–64 years.

Average HTN prevalence in Krasnoyarsk Krai appeared rather high (49.4%). It is higher than the average for 10 regions of Russia included in the ESSE-RF study (44.0%). In addition, we found significantly (χ2 for trend; p < 0.001) higher HTN prevalence in males (56.3%) than in females (43.7%). This difference is especially significant (more than 2 times) in the youngest age group (25–34 years old) and flattens in older age (79.9% in males and 76.7% in females in the group of patients aged 55–64) because of increasing number of hypertensive patients among females (see Table 1).

HTN prevalence also significantly (χ2 for trend; p < 0.001) depends on the place of living both in the general (63.4 ± 4.70% in rural vs 44.2 ± 2.94% in urban) and in the gender groups (65.0 ± 6.66% vs 52.2 ± 4.90% in males and 62.0 ± 6.47% vs 39.6 ± 3.53% in females, respectively).

Average HTN awareness in Krasnoyarsk Krai is 77.9%. We found it rather high in all age groups. However, among patients younger than the age of 55, females are better aware of their disease than males (see Table 1).

To estimate antihypertensive therapy effectiveness, we calculated self-reported use of antihypertensive medications and percentage of patients who achieved target BP both among patients taking antihypertensive medications and among all hypertensive patients. In Krasnoyarsk Krai, 59.5% of patients aged 25–64 take antihypertensive medications. Antihypertensive therapy appeared efficient (target BP levels achieved) in 31.6% of treated hypertensives and in 18.8% of all hypertensive patients. For more details on incidence of antihypertensive medications intake, reaching target BP levels and their dependence on gender and age see Table 2.
Table 2

The use of antihypertensive medications and the rate of hypertension control depending on age and gender

Age group in years

Male

Female

Total

The use of antihypertensive medications (% ± 95% CI)

 

% (n)

95% CI

% (n)

95% CI

% (n)

95% CI

25–34

22.7% (n = 10)

12.35

44.0% (n = 11)

19.40

30.4% (n = 21)

10.78

35–44

28.8% (n = 15)

12.35

50.0% (n = 31)

12.35

40.4% (n = 46)

9.02

45–54

49.5% (n = 51)

9.60

66.4% (n = 89)

8.04

59.1% (n = 140)

6.27

55–64

65.0% (n = 93)

7.84

77.3% (n = 153)

5.88

72.1% (n = 246)

4.70

Percentage of patients achieved target BP among hypertensives receiving antihypertensive medications (% ± 95% CI)

 

% (n)

95% CI

% (n)

95% CI

% (n)

95% CI

25–34

70.0% (n = 7)

28.42

45.5% (n = 5)

29.40

57.1% (n = 12)

21.17

35–44

40.0% (n = 6)

24.89

41.9% (n = 13)

17.44

41.3% (n = 19)

14.31

45–54

27.5% (n = 14)

12.35

47.2% (n = 42)

10.39

40.0% (n = 56)

8.04

55–64

20.4% (n = 19)

8.23

24.2% (n = 37)

6.86

22.8% (n = 56)

5.29

The rate of hypertension control among all hypertensives (% ± 95% CI)

 

% (n)

95% CI

% (n)

95% CI

% (n)

95% CI

25–34

15.9% (n = 7)

10.80

20.0% (n = 5)

15.68

17.4% (n = 12)

9.02

35–44

11.5% (n = 6)

8.68

21.0% (n = 13)

10.19

16.7% (n = 19)

6.86

45–54

13.6% (n = 14)

6.62

31.3% (n = 42)

7.84

23.6% (n = 56)

5.49

55–64

13.3% (n = 19)

5.57

18.7% (n = 37)

5.49

16.4% (n = 56)

3.92

Percentage of patients taking antihypertensive medications noticeably grows with age (from 30.4% to 72.1% of hypertensive patients), more in females than in males (χ2 for trend; p < 0.001). Target BP levels achievement demonstrates another dependence: the older the patients are, the smaller percentage of patients reaches target levels of BP (from 57.1% to 22.8%; χ2 for trend; p < 0.001). Again, females reach target BP more often than males, except for the 25–34 years group.

In comparison with all-Russian data from 10 regions included in the ESSE-RF study in Krasnoyarsk Krai, more patients take antihypertensive medications (49.4% vs 39.5% of males; 67.8% vs 60.9% of females, and 59% vs 53.1% in general), but the efficacy of antihypertensive treatment in our region is lower than in the rest of Russia (27.2% vs 41.4% males, 34.2% vs 53.5% females, and 31.6% vs 49.1% in general).

The educational background of patients not only has significant influence upon their BP level (H0 rejected, p = 0.01), but also antihypertensive treatment efficacy (χ2 for trend; p = 0.007) and the whole population’s prevalence of HTN (χ2 for trend; p < 0.001). However, incidence of antihypertensive medications intake and HTN awareness do not depend significantly on the educational background (for details, see Tables 3, 4).
Table 3

Levels of BP, hypertension prevalence and hypertension awareness depending on education level

Education level

Male

Female

Total

Levels of Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) depending on education level (mmHg, median (Q25; Q75)

 

SBP

Q25; Q75

SBP

Q25; Q75

SBP

Q25; Q75

Higher education

133.0

122.5; 142.5

121.5

112.0; 135.5

125.5

115.5; 139.0

Secondary education

139.0

127.3; 150.0

133.0

120.8; 146.0

136.0

122.5; 148.0

Primary education

141.5

126.0; 155.5

133.3

121.0; 142.5

140.0

125.5; 149.5

Levels of Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) depending on education level (mmHg, median (Q25; Q75)

 

DBP

Q25; Q75

DBP

Q25; Q75

DBP

Q25; Q75

Higher education

82.5

76.0; 90.0

77.5

70.5; 86.5

80.0

72.0; 87.5

Secondary education

85.5

77.5; 92.5

83.0

76.0; 91.5

84.5

77.0; 92.0

Primary education

86.5

76.5; 94.5

83.5

77.0; 90.0

85.5

76.5; 91.0

Hypertension prevalence depending on education level (% ± 95% CI)

 

% (n)

95% CI

% (n)

95% CI

% (n)

95% CI

Higher education

45.6 (n = 104)

6.47

32.4 (n = 156)

4.12

36.7 (n = 260)

3.53

Secondary education

62.7 (n = 208)

5.10

57.5 (n = 246)

4.70

59.7 (n = 454)

3.53

Primary education

63.8 (n = 30)

13.70

65.4 (n = 17)

18.23

64.4 (n = 47)

10.98

Hypertension awareness depending on education level (% ± 95% CI)

 

% (n)

95% CI

% (n)

95% CI

% (n)

95% CI

Higher education

80.8 (n = 84)

5.10

83.4 (n = 120)

3.33

82.7 (n = 204)

2.74

Secondary education

75.5 (n = 157)

4.51

81.5 (n = 197)

3.72

79.5 (n = 354)

2.94

Primary education

80.0 (n = 24)

10.19

61.5 (n = 11)

18.62

76.7 (n = 35)

9.60

Table 4

The use of antihypertensive medications and the rate of hypertension control depending on education level

Education level

Male

Female

Total

The use of antihypertensive medications depending on education level (% ± 95% CI)

 

% (n)

95% CI

% (n)

95% CI

% (n)

95% CI

Higher education

53.8 (n = 56)

9.60

62.2 (n = 97)

7.64

58.8 (n = 153)

6.08

Secondary education

48.1 (n = 100)

6.86

71.5 (n = 176)

5.68

60.8 (n = 276)

4.51

Primary education

43.3 (n = 13)

17.84

64.7 (n = 11)

22.74

51.1 (n = 24)

14.31

Percentage of hypertensives achieved target BP among receiving antihypertensive treatment depending on education level (% ± 95% CI)

 

% (n)

95% CI

% (n)

95% CI

% (n)

95% CI

Higher education

35.7 (n = 20)

12.54

44.3 (n = 43)

9.80

41.2 (n = 63)

7.84

Secondary education

23.0 (n = 23)

8.23

28.4 (n = 50)

6.66

26.4 (n = 73)

5.29

Primary education

23.1 (n = 3)

22.93

36.4 (n = 4)

28.42

29.2 (n = 7)

18.23

The rate of hypertension control among all hypertensives depending on education level (% ± 95% CI)

 

% (n)

95% CI

% (n)

95% CI

% (n)

95% CI

Higher education

19.2% (n = 20)

7.64

27.6% (n = 43)

7.06

24.2% (n = 63)

5.10

Secondary education

11.1% (n = 23)

4.31

20.3% (n = 50)

5.10

16.1% (n = 73)

3.33

Primary education

10.0% (n = 3)

10.78

23.5% (n = 4)

20.19

14.9% (n = 7)

10.19

Discussion

According to this study’s results, the levels of mean systolic and diastolic BP among representative sample of adults aged 25 to 64 years old in Krasnoyarsk Krai appeared somewhat higher compared with corresponding Russian national average figures taken from the ESSE-RF study.

Average HTN prevalence in Krasnoyarsk Krai (49.4%) appeared to be significantly higher than average for 10 regions of Russia included in the ESSE-RF study (44.0%). Most studies in Western countries report considerably lower prevalence of HTN: 19.5% in Canada, 29% in USA, 30% in England [12], 42.6% in Spain [13], as well as in China (32.5%) [14]. Nevertheless, certain districts of Serbia showed higher HTN prevalence (53%) [15].

Noteworthy, significantly higher prevalence of HTN was found in males than in females (56.3% vs 43.7%). It is associated with modern national and international tendency. However, this difference flattens in the older age (55–64 years old). Results of this study have clearly demonstrated dependence of HTN prevalence on the place of living: rural population had significantly higher prevalence of HTN in general and in both gender groups.

Average HTN awareness in Krasnoyarsk Krai was 77.9%. It was found rather high in all age groups. Exceeding the average national level of awareness (73.1%), this parameter corresponds well with the data from developed Western countries (81% in USA, 83% in Canada, 65% in England) [12]. HTN awareness in Krasnoyarsk Krai appeared to be much higher than in low-income and middle-income countries (40.8–50.2%, according to PURE Study; from 33.5% to 69.0%, according to NHLBI/UHG Network) [16, 17]. Unfortunately, the efficacy of antihypertensive treatment leaves much to be desired. While in Krasnoyarsk Krai 59.5% patients aged 25–64 receive antihypertensive medications, only 31.6% of treated hypertensives (and 18.8% of all hypertensive population) achieve target BP levels. It seems to be that reasons for inadequate level of BP control include insufficient patients’ compliance (inaccuracy in following prescribed mode of medication intake), non-optimal choice of antihypertensive therapy, its combination and dosing by physicians. Noteworthy, the effectiveness of HTN treatment in highly industrialized countries is continuously growing (the rate of hypertension control is reported to be 66% in Canada [12] and up to 70% in selected population in the USA [2]).

Conclusions

In view of this, the results of this epidemiological study indicate that HTN prevalence among adults in Krasnoyarsk Krai is rather high and exceeds the corresponding average Russian HTN rate. Prevalence of HTN is significantly higher in males than in females excluding the age group 55–64 years, in which this difference is disappearing. Rural inhabitants are more likely to have HTN than urban citizens (both in males and females, as well as in the whole population). Despite rather high levels of HTN awareness and antihypertensive treatment, treatment efficacy in target BP achievement appeared to be lower in Krasnoyarsk Krai as compared to average Russian ESSE-RF data.

Limitations

Being a part of ESSE-RF study, our study was limited to research 25–64 years old age group as the most employable part of population. Diagnosis of hypertension was based on measures and history taken at a single visit, but this approach is similar to that of many epidemiological studies.

Abbreviations

BP: 

Blood pressure

DPM: 

diastolic blood pressure

ESSE-RF: 

Epidemiological Survey of cardiovascular diSEases in different regions of the Russian Federation

HTN: 

Hypertension

SBP: 

systolic blood pressure.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Our appreciation to the Center of Preventive Medicine (Moscow) for consulting the research conducting. We also thank Dr. Evsyukov A, Dr. Danilova L, Dr. Topolskaya N and Dr. Kosinova A who assisted throughout the study.

Funding

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset supporting the conclusion of this article is available on reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions

All authors (IPA, YuIG, MMP, VVS and RRR) conceived the study and took part in drafting the manuscript. IPA gave statistical advice. VVS and RRR conducted patient recruitment, interviews, and physical examinations. RRR performed the statistical analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript for publication. All the authors assume responsibility for the accuracy and integrity of the analysis.

Competing interests

There are no conflicts of interest pertained to this submission.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and was reviewed and approved by the local ethics committee (Ethics Committee of Krasnoyarsk State medical University). The participants received information about the study methods and gave their written informed consent.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Krasnoyarsk State Medical University named after prof. V. F. Voyno-Yasenetsky, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

References

  1. Campbell NR, Lackland DT, Niebylski ML, World Hypertension League Committee, International Society of Hypertension Executive Committee. High blood pressure: why prevention and control are urgent and important: a 2014 fact sheet from the World hypertension league and the International Society of Hypertension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2014;16(8):551–3. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.12372.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Yoon SS, Gu Q, Nwankwo T, Wright JD, Hong Y, Burt V. Trends in blood pressure among adults with hypertension: United States, 2003 to 2012. Hypertension. 2015;65(1):54–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.04012.
  3. Irazola VE, Gutierrez L, Bloomfield G, Carrillo-Larco RM, Dorairaj P, Gaziano T, et al. Hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control in selected LMIC communities: results from the NHLBI/UHG Network of centers of excellence for chronic diseases. Glob Heart. 2016;11(1):47–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gheart.2015.12.008.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Asgari S, Khalili D, Mehrabi Y, Kazempour-Ardebili S, Azizi F, Hadaegh F. Incidence and risk factors of isolated systolic and diastolic hypertension: a 10 year follow-up of the Tehran lipids and glucose study. Blood Press. 2016;25(3):177–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/08037051.2015.1116221.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kim NR, Kim HC. Prevalence and trends of isolated systolic hypertension among Korean adults: the Korea National Health and nutrition examination survey, 1998-2012. Korean Circ J. 2015;45(6):492–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2015.45.6.492.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Koju R, Manandhar K, Risal A, Steiner TJ, Holen A, Linde M. Undertreated hypertension and its implications for public health in Nepal: nationwide population-based survey. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2015;13(49):3–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Howitt C, Hambleton IR, Rose AM, Hennis A, Samuels TA, George KS et al. Social distribution of diabetes, hypertension and related risk factors in Barbados: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2015; 18;5(12):e008869 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008869.
  8. Li W, Gu H, Teo KK, Bo J, Wang Y, Yang J, et al. Hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control in 115 rural and urban communities involving 47 000 people from China. J Hypertens. 2016;34(1):39–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000000745.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Guwatudde D, Nankya-Mutyoba J, Kalyesubula R, Laurence C, Adebamowo C, Ajayi I et al. The burden of hypertension in sub-Saharan Africa: a four-country cross sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2015; 5;15:1211. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2546-z.
  10. Boitsov SA, Chazov EI, Shlyakhto EV, Shalnova SA, Konradi AO, Karpov YA, et al. [epidemiology of cardiovascular diseases in different regions of Russia (ESSE-RF). The rationale for and design of the study]. Profilakticheskaya meditsina =. Prev Med. 2013;16(6):25–34. In RussianGoogle Scholar
  11. Boytsov SA, Balanova YA, Shalnova SA, Deev AD, Artamonova GV, Gatagonova TM, et al. Arterial hypertension among individuals of 25–64 years old: prevalence, awareness, treatment and control. By the data from ECCD. Kardiovascularnaya terapiya i profilaktika = Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2014;13(4):4–14. In RussianView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Joffres M, Falaschetti E, Gillespie C, Robitaille C, Loustalot F, Poulter N et al. Hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment and control in national surveys from England, the USA and Canada, and correlation with stroke and ischaemic heart disease mortality: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2013; 30;3(8):e003423 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003423.
  13. Menéndez E, Delgado E, Fernández-Vega F, Prieto MA, Bordiú E, Calle A, et al. Prevalence, diagnosis, treatment, and control of hypertension in Spain. Results of the Di@bet.Es study. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2016;69(6):572–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2015.11.034.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Lewington S, Lacey B, Clarke R, Guo Y, Kong XL, Yang L, et al. The burden of hypertension and associated risk for cardiovascular mortality in China. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(4):524–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0190.
  15. Marinković M, Ilić N, Djokić D, Andrejević V, Damjanović G, Samardzić G, et al. Prevalence of hypertension in adults in the Sumadija district, Serbia - a cross-sectional study. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2014;71(3):245–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Irazola VE, Gutierrez L, Bloomfield G, Carrillo-Larco RM, Dorairaj P, Gaziano T, et al. Hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control in selected LMIC communities: results from the NHLBI/UHG Network of centers of excellence for chronic diseases. Glob Herat. 2016;11(1):47–59. doi:10.1016/j.gheart.2015.12.008.Google Scholar
  17. Chow CK, Teo KK, Rangarajan S, Islam S, Gupta R, Avezum A, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in rural and urban communities in high, middle-, and low-income countries. JAMA. 2013;310(9):959–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.184182.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017