Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Pre- and post-surgical evaluation of the inflammatory response in patients with aortic stenosis treated with different types of prosthesis

  • Maria Elena Soto1Email author,
  • Jose Luis Salas2,
  • Jesus Vargas-Barron3,
  • Ricardo Marquez1,
  • Alejandra Rodriguez-Hernandez4,
  • Rafael Bojalil-Parra1,
  • Israel Pérez-Torres5 and
  • Veronica Guarner-Lans6
BMC Cardiovascular DisordersBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:100

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-017-0526-1

Received: 9 June 2016

Accepted: 30 March 2017

Published: 14 April 2017

Abstract

Background

The inflammatory process in aortic valvular stenosis persists after surgery to replace the valve in almost half of the patients. No association has been found to its persistence. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the inflammatory response in patients with aortic stenosis through the determination of several biomarkers in plasma measured before and after the valvular replacement and to seek an association with the type of prosthesis used.

Methods

This is an observational study with a follow up of 6 months in subjects with severe aortic stenosis. Seric concentrations of TNFa, IL-1, IL-6 and ICAM and echocardiographic variables were quantified previous to the surgery and a week and 6 months after it. A group of control subjects paired by age and gender was included.

Results

Seventy-nine subjects were studied of which 57% were male; the average age was of 59 (± 11.4) years. Previous to surgery, the concentration of cytokines was higher in patients than in control subjects. A biological prosthesis was implanted in 48 patients and a mechanical prosthesis in 31. Both, types of prosthesis have components made of titanium. The echocardiograms 1 week and 6 months after the surgery showed a decrease in the mean aortic gradient and an increase in the valvular area (p = 0.001). Half of the patients still showed high proinflammatory cytokine levels. There were no differences according to the type of prosthesis implanted after adjustments for demographic variables, comorbidities and echocardiographic data.

Conclusions

The inflammatory response caused by both types of valvular prothesis at 6 months after implantation were similar. Both types of prosthesis are recommended, they had similarities in hemodynamic profiles registered with Doppler echocardiography. Age of the patient or the suitability use of anticoagulants determines the type of prosthesis to be used.

Keywords

Aortic valve Aortic stenosis Inflammatory response Heart surgery

Background

Aortic stenosis (AS) is a disease that develops with a high local inflammatory response. Its physiopathogeny resembles that of the atherosclerotic process. It is characterized by an initial lesion in the valvular endothelium followed by an active inflammatory infiltrate that leads to progressive calcification, reduction of the valvular area and an increase in the left ventricular (LV) afterload [13].

Accordingly, dramatically increased levels of intracellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM1) and proinflammatory cytokines such as tumoral necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin 6 (IL-6) and interleukin 1 (IL-1) are found in patients with AS [46]. The only effective treatment in severe AS is the surgical replacement of the aortic valve. However, even after the surgical procedure, the inflammatory state persists in almost half of the patients [7]. However, recently, it has been proposed that the technical approach determines the inflammatory response after surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement [8].

Previous studies have not found a correlation between age, gender, smoking habit, ventricular geometry, transvalvular aortic gradient, atherosclerosis risk factors or infection by Chlamydia pneumoniae and the persistence of the inflammatory state after the replacement of the aortic valve [9, 10].

The factors triggering or perpetuating the chronic inflammatory process after the valvular replacement are multiple and some of them might even coexist [11]. Therefore, it might be likely that some of the materials with which the different kinds of prosthesis are manufactured could induce the inflammatory mechanisms. [12].

It is well known that mechanical and biological prosthesis are manufactured with different types of materials. In the biological prosthesis, the incomplete process of removing cells from the original animal tissue could lead the presence of protein residues in the valves that might act as immunogens. [13] The metallic components present in mechanical prosthesis such as titanium could also trigger an inflammatory response [14, 15]. It is still unknown if the hemodynamic profile of the patients correlates with the type of inflammatory response or if this response is in correlation with the type of prosthesis implanted.

The main objective of this study was to evaluate the inflammatory response in patients with aortic stenosis through the determination of several biomarkers in plasma measured before and after the valvular replacement and to seek an association with the type of prosthesis used.

Methods

This is an observational, longitudinal, prospective follow-up study of 6 months. A cohort of patients with aortic stenosis recruited consecutively from September 2013 to January 2015 was studied.

Inclusion criteria

Subjects of any gender, aged 40 years or more and hospitalized with the diagnosis of severe aortic stenosis determined by nonrheumatic clinical criteria and by echocardiography criteria were included [16]. They agreed to participate by signing an informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Patients with moderate or severe aortic insufficiency, patients having other moderate or severe valvular disease, patients with coronary artery disease, subjects that required other cardiac surgery in addition to aortic valve replacement, patients with autoimmune or oncologic diseases and patients using immunosuppressant were excluded. The use of Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and/or caffeinated foods was suspended 1 day before the blood sampling and 1 week in the case of statins. An elimination criteria was the development of any intra-hospital infection.

Control group

Forty healthy subjects were matched by age and gender and the age of some controls could be matched with more than one case. Control subjects underwent physical examination, complete transthoracic echocardiography to rule out structural cardiac abnormalities and collection of peripheral blood samples by venopunction for the quantification of inflammatory mediators.

Sample size

With a confidence of 95% and a power of 90%, a sample of 35 patients per group was estimated by difference in proportions based on the concentration of TNF α obtained in previous studies [10].

Study design

The study was divided into three phases: preoperative (7 days before surgery), early postoperative (7 days after surgery) and late postoperative (6 months after surgery). In each of the phases an interrogation and physical examination directed to discard active infectious foci was conducted. In the pre-surgical protocol of patients in which cardiac surgery is performed a multidisciplinary team mis involved where the ginecology, odontology and infectology departments intervene. An exhaustive physical examination aimed to determine the clinical diagnosis of active infections is practiced including the performance of an uroculture and nasal and vaginal cultures. In the event of a positive culture, patients are excluded from the surgical programming until they have received antibiotic treatment and a negative culture is obtained. The results from the cultures of every patient previous to surgery were negative and the results from the leucocyte measurement had a mean value of 5600 ± 800. A transthoracic echocardiography study was done and peripheral blood samples for quantification of inflammatory mediators were obtained.

Determination of cytokines

10 ml of peripheral blood were centrifuged at 2500 rpm/10 min at 4 °C; then 500 ml aliquots of serum were made and stored at −75 °C until cytokine determination. Subsequently, TNF, IL-1, IL-6 and ICAM-1 were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) sandwich using commercial systems DuoSet (R & D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer [17].

Echocardiographic study

The echocardiographic study was conducted by two experts’ echocardiographists as is actually recommended [18]. An ultrasound system Philips iE33 xMATRIX (Philips, AndoverMassachusetts) with a transducer ×5 was employed. The LV dimensions were measured using the long parasternal axis; the volumes of the left atrium and LV were calculated with the method of Simpson. The aortic valve area was estimated with the equation of continuity. LV mass was estimated with the method of Devereaux. The mean and maximum aortic transvalvular gradient were obtained from the apical projection of three or five chambers, where an appropriate continuous spectrum from the Doppler was found and where the most transaortic velocity was observed. Systolic pulmonary artery pressure was estimated by the addition of the right atrial pressure to the gradient of tricuspid regurgitation.

Type of prosthesis implanted

The decision on the type of prosthesis to be implanted was made by the medical team. After aortic valve replacement, the surgery population was divided into two groups according to the type of prosthesis used; biological or mechanical. Biological prostheses manufactured in the National Institute of Cardiology “Ignacio Chavez” from bovine pericardium and titanium metal support were implanted. Mechanical prostheses were bileaflet which are made of pyrolytic carbon and mounted on a support of pyrocarbon covered with Dacron St. Jude Medical™ Masters HP series. A follow up of 6 months from the date of surgery was done.

Ethical aspects

The study included the signature of an informed consent form that is in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the protocol was approved by the scientific and institutional bioethics committee.

Statistical analysis

The categorical variables were expressed in proportions, when there was a continuity in mean ± standard deviation or median interquartile range according to distribution. The comparisons were done using Chi Square or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables; for dimensional variables, Student’s t or Mann-Whitney’s U tests were applied. The correlations were done with Pearson’s r for quantitative variables or with Spearman’s rho for qualitative variables. Related samples, where repeated measurements were done, were analyzed with ANOVA and Friedman’s test or with a distribution with a post hoc test to identify differences between groups. The differences were considered as statistically significant when the p value was <0.05. The statistical analysis was done with the SPSS program version 22 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, Illinois).

Results

We studied 150 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis, of which 90 met inclusion criteria; Patients were eliminated due to the development of serious intrahospital infection (n = 2) and to the concomitant finding of arterial coronary disease (n = 9), leaving a final population of 79 cases (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

The design of study and flow of patients

Of the total cases, 45 (57%) were men with an average age of 59 (± 11.4) years, the average age in men with AS was lower (57 ± 12) than in women with AS (62 ± 8.6), p = 0.025. Table 1 shows percentage of demograhic characteristics between cases and controls. 10 (12.5%), cases with diabetes, 29(36%) Hypertension and 7 (8.8%) smoking habits. The total prosthesis, biologic and mechanical, implanted were 48(61%) and 31 (39%) by each type of co morbidity were implanted: in patients with diabetes 4(8%) and 6(19%), with hypertension 18 (38%) and 11(35%), and with smooking habits 4(8%) and 3 (10%) respectively.
Table 1

Demographic characteristics of the AS patient and the control groups

Variables

AS

CONTROL

p

Mean (±) SD

n = 79

n = 40

 

n (%)

   

Age (yr)

59 (11)

58 (11)

0.25

Men

45 (57)

23 (57)

0.68

Women

34 (43)

17 (43)

0.72

Weight (Kg)

69 (11.2)

65 (10)

0.36

Height (cm)

161 (8.8)

165 (9)

0.58

BSA (m2)

1.71 (0.17)

1.74 (0.2)

0.87

Diabetes

8 (10)

0

 

Hypertension

22 (27.8)

0

AS aortic stenosis, BSA body surface area

In the initial echocardiogram all patients had severe aortic stenosis with a valve area of ​​0.67 (± 0.2) cm2, mean aortic gradient of 59 (± 16) mmHg and maximum velocity of flow of 4.8 (± 0.6) m/s. The mean LVEF was 53% (± 17). In 30 patients TNFa concentrations were higher than in controls (38%). In 26 patients (33%) the IL-1 concentrations were elevated and in 30 (38%) there was an elevation of IL-6. All patients had elevated levels of ICAM-1. When comparing the group of patients who had elevated levels of cytokines with those who had normal values no significant differences in age, gender or echocardiographic parameters of aortic stenosis were found. When the comparison between the groups was made for values ​​of inflammatory mediators, there was a tendency to an increase in TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6 and ICAM-1concentrations in AS patients versus controls, with p values of 0.08, 0.09, 0.10 and 0.07 respectively (Table 2).
Table 2

Echocardiographic variables and interleukin levels of AS patients and control groups

Variables

AS

CONTROL

p

mean(±SD)

n = 79

n = 40

LV mass (gr/m2BSA)

144 (45)

73 (8)

0.001

AoV area (cm2)

0.67 (0.2)

2.9 (0.4)

0.001

Ao Mean Gr (mmHg)

59 (16)

2 (0.4)

0.001

Ao Max Vel (m/s)

4.8 (0.6)

0.9 (0.2)

0.001

Ao annulus (mm)

21 (2.6)

22 (3)

NS

LVEF (%)

52 (13)

67 (4.2)

0.001

PASP (mmHg)

36 (13)

22 (2.5)

0.001

TNFα (pg/cc)

0 (0-65)a

0 (0-30)a

0.08

IL-1 (pg/cc)

0 (0-36)a

0 (0-15.7)a

0.09

IL-6 (pg/cc)

0 (0-30)a

0 (0-10.7)a

0.1

ICAM-1 (pg/cc)

3610 (3060-6854)a

3555 (3199-3849)a

0.07

amedian (IQR 25-75)

AS Aortic stenosis, LV left ventricle, Ao aortic, V valve, Gr gradient, Max maximum, Vel velocity, Vol volume, LVEF LV expulsion fraction, PASP pulmonary artery systolic pressure, IQR interquartile range

There were no significant differences in the concentration of cytokines in relation to gender (TNFa: p = 0.071, IL-1: p = 0.31, IL-6: 0.76 and ICAM-1: p = 0.5). As well as no differences in the concentrations of cytokines between the older and younger than 60 years of age subjects (p = 0.15, IL-1: p = 0.3, IL-6 and ICAM-1 0.2: p = 0.9 TNFa).

Early post surgical stage

In 61% (n = 48) of the patients a biological prosthesis was implanted, and in 39% (n = 31) a mechanical valve was used. Women are more frequently implanted with a biological prosthesis than men (73% vs 51%), p = 0.043. An overall significant improvement in echocardiographic parameters was found with an increase in aortic valve area, a decreased mean aortic transvalvular gradient and a decreased in flow velocity. When the ventricular geometry was analyzed, there was a decrease in LV mass (p = 0.001). A significant increase in the concentration of cytokines was found when compared to the preoperative values (Table 3).
Table 3

Comparison between surgical stages in all type of prosthesis

Variable mean(±SD)

Preoperative

Early PostCx

LatePostCx

p

LV mass (gr/m2 BSA)

144 (45)

131 (38)

115 (28)

0.001

AoV area (cm2)

0.67 (0.2)

1.5 (0.25)

1.7 (0.15)

0.001

Ao Mean Gr (mmHg)

59 (16)

18 (8)

15 (5.5)

0.001

Ao Max Vel (m/s)

4.8 (0.6)

2.6 (0.6)

2.3 (0.4)

0.01

LVEF (%)

52 (13)

52 (12)

56 (9)

0.01

PASP (mmHg)

36 (13)

34 (9)

28 (5.4)

0.001

TNFα (pg/cc)

0 (0-65)a

0 (0-269)a

60 (0-204)a

0.001

IL-1 (pg/cc)

0 (0-36)a

0 (0-90)a

0 (0-65)a

0.01

IL-6 (pg/cc)

0 (0-30)a

18 (0-98)a

16 (0-80)a

0.048

ICAM-1 (pg/cc)

3610 (3060-6854)a

6306 (4984-7058)a

3782 (3138-6460)a

0.001

amedian (IQR 25-75)

BSA body surface area, LV left ventricle, Ao aortic, V valve, Vol volume, Gr gradient, Max maximum, Vel velocity, LVEF LV expulsion fraction, PASP pulmonary artery systolic pressure, IQR interquartile range

Late post surgical stage

At a follow-up period of 6 months an additional decrease in mean aortic gradient and maximum velocity, and an increase in aortic valve area were observed. There was also a decrease in left ventricular mass (Table 3). About half of the patients still had elevated levels of cytokines at this stage, TNFa: 60% (n = 47), IL-1: 42% (n = 33) and IL-6: 53% (n = 42) and all of the patients maintained high levels of ICAM-1. There was a greater concentration of inflammatory cytokines (TNFa: p = 0.001, IL-1: p = 0.05, IL-6 and ICAM-1 0003: p = 0.039) when compared with the control group. The post-hoc analysis of Friedman test showed that at the late postoperative stage, the cytokine concentrations were higher than before the surgery (TNF: p = 0.001, IL-1: p = 0.001, IL-6 and ICAM 0.034 1: p = 0.001). Comparing the late postoperative stage with the early postoperative stage, there were no significant decreases in the concentrations of TNF (p = 0.62) and IL-6 (p = 0.24), but a downward tendency in IL-1 (p = 0.08) and a significant decrease in ICAM-1 (0016). An inverse correlation was found between ICAM-1 and the maximum aortic velocity (r = −0.22, p = 0.05) and the mean aortic gradient (r = 0.25, p = 0.02).

When the population was divided according to the type of prosthesis implanted (biological or mechanical) no significant differences in the parameters of echocardiography were found in the early and late postsurgical stages, nor in the concentration of inflammatory mediators (Table 4).
Table 4

Comparison of echocardiographic characteristics and biomarkers among the type of implanted prosthetic aortic valve

 

Early Postsurgical

Late Postsurgical

VARIABLES

Biologic

Mechanic

p

Biologic

Mechanic

p

mean (±SD)

n = 48

n = 31

 

n = 48

n = 31

 

LV mass (gr/m2 BSA)

132 (39)

129 (37)

0.75

117 (30)

112 (27)

0.45

AoV area (cm2)

1.5 (0.24)

1.5 (0.26)

0.41

1.7 (0.14)

1.7 (0.16)

0.2

Ao Mean Gr (mmHg)

17 (7.9)

19 (8.2)

0.33

15 (5)

17 (6)

0.09

Ao Max Vel (m/s)

2.5 (0.62)

2.7 (0.59)

0.32

2.2 (0.46)

2.4 (0.44)

0.17

LVEF (%)

53 (11)

51 (14)

0.57

56 (8)

56 (11)

0.8

PASP (mmHg)

35 (8)

33 (9)

0.37

29 (5)

28 (6)

0.6

TNFα (pg/cc)

16 (0-264)a

0 (0-387)a

0.61

0 (60-252)a

0 (62-150)a

0.41

IL-1 (pg/cm3)

9 (0-84)a

0 (0-146)a

0.7

0 (0-66)a

0 (0-65)a

0.64

IL-6 (pg/cc)

17 (0-106)a

44 (0-92)a

0.91

18 (0-78)a

0 (0-82)a

0.41

ICAM-1 (pg/cc)

6336 (5041-41,060)a

6066 (4534-6822)a

0.46

4287 (3161-43,985)a

3632 (3052-5986)a

0.24

amedian (IQR 25-75)

BSA body surface area, LV left ventricle, Ao aortic, V valve, Gr gradient, Max maximum, Vel velocity, Vol volume, LVEF LV expulsion fraction, PASP: pulmonary artery systolic pressure, IQR: interquartile range

Discussion

After surgery for aortic valve replacement, approximately 50% of the patients continued to have an active systemic inflammatory state that was even higher than the one present in the preoperative stage. Our data is consistent with that of previous studies where a significant proportion of subjects remained with high levels of inflammatory mediators [7]. We did not find significant differences in the concentration of cytokines in our population according to the type of valve implanted even when the valve prostheses are manufactured with different materials. Biological valvular prostheses are made from animal tissue that is subjected to a decellularization process and glutaraldehyde fixation in order to reduce their immunogenicity [19, 20]. The artificial valves are manufactured from various synthetic materials, including carbon graphite, pyrolytic carbon and titanium [21]. It has been reported that the residual phospholipids in biological tissue prosthesis could trigger an inflammatory response that might explain the high concentration of cytokines in the subjects who received this type of prosthesis [22]. It is also known that some types of implanted prostheses manufactured with titanium may trigger a chronic inflammatory response, which is not necessarily acute, and where the mechanism might be mediated by Toll receptors [23].

Titanium has high resistance to corrosion in biological environments and it is for this reason that it is the biomaterial of choice for manufacturing implant devices used in various sites in the body. The contact between the biological tissue and the metal promotes the formation of a stable layer of titanium oxide on the surface of the implant [24]. In tissues surrounding the biomaterial and in regional lymph nodes, titanium ions can be found. Despite its biocompatibility there are excellent studies that show that titanium is an allergen capable of triggering an immune response [25].

In experimental mouse models spread of titanium nanoparticles from the intra-articular injection site to the rest of the body has been found [26]. Similarly, neuroinflammation induced by titanium has been found in mice [27]. The results shown here agree with the previously published medical literature. There are studies on inflammation in patients that received mechanical and biological aortic prosthesis where no significant differences between the types of materials were found after an implantation time of 6 months to 2 years similar to those studied here. After some time of the implantation of the biological or mechanical valves, a deposit of extracellular matrix and calcification in the bioprosthetic tissue or the appearance of pannus in the mechanical valves begins, which correlates with prosthetic dysfunction [28].

Oxidative damage and lipid peroxidation was also observed in the synovium of patients with implanted devices which induced the expression of proinflammatory cytokines such as TNFa and IL-1 [29]. Other studies have found toxicity in cells of the heart tissue after exposure to titanium dioxide. There are also well known hiperesensibility reactions to titanium after implantation of this material in dentistry and orthopedics. There are also reports of systemic inflammation caused by titanium nanoparticles [15] and of activation of the immune system with retarded hypersensitivity reactions.

This suggests that the sustained inflammatory response after replacement of the aortic valve may be due to an immune response to components of implanted prostheses such as titanium which is present in both biological and mechanical prosthesis. A striking finding of this study is that the increase in interleukins was similar in patients that had been implanted with any kind of valvular prosthesis. Therefore, we consider that it would be convenient to study the inflammatory response in other types of valvular prosthesis containing titanium and other metallic alloys such as nickel chromium.

The results of this study are consistent with previously published experience. There are studies of inflammation in biological and mechanical aortic prostheses in which no significant differences were found between both manufacturing materials with implantation time from 6 months to 2 years. Problems associated to the durability of the prosthesis and the appearance of dysfunction occurs in a similar rate in mechanical and biological valves. A requirement of another intervention is necessary in up to 60% of the implants for both types of prosthesis [30, 31].

The deposition of extracellular matrix and the formation of pannus leads to the dysfunction of mechanical prostheses. On the other hand, in the dysfunction of biological prostheses calcification and inflammation play an important role [32]. Recent studies have shown that the pathologic calcification in these prosthesis, might be regulated by inductor and inhibitor factors similar to those regulating bone mineralization. The pathophysiology of calcification of biological valves has been evaluated in-vitro and in animal models [33, 34]. For a better comprehension, several aspects should be analyzed such as the determinants of mineralization and their regulating mechanisms. Among these determinants, the metabolism of the host plays an important role. Other mechanical factors include the structure and the chemistry of the implant. Regarding regulation, the pre-treatment of these valves with high doses of glutaraldehide should be considered [35, 36].

Without taking into account the type of prosthesis, inflammation biomarkers have not shown a direct correlation with alterations in the echocardiographic parameters since high levels of cytokines can be found in normal valvular prosthesis and low levels have been found in subjects with dysfunctional ones [37]. This finding was also observed in the present series of patients.

The diversity of the damage mechanisms in each type of prosthesis has been widely discussed and is important when deciding the better therapeutic approach. The decision should take into account the inflammatory, degenerative or calcifying activity of each type of prosthesis. The determination of which type of valve should be used for each patient should include the medical and non-medical conditions, the knowledge of the mechanisms associated to the material to be implanted, and the risk/benefit ratio.

Since the durability of both types of prosthesis is similar, we believe factors such as the cost/effectivity, risk/benefit ratios and quality of life of the patient should be more deeply investigated to decide which type of valve should be implanted.

Conclusion

The inflammatory response caused by biological valvular prosthesis after 6 months of having been installed is similar to that produced mechanical prostheses. In addition, the similarity in the hemodynamic profiles registered with Doppler echocardiography in patients that had received any of the prosthesis allows us to conclude that both types of valve prostheses are recommended. The decision of the type of valve prosthesis implanted is related more to factors such as age of the patient or the suitability of the use of anticoagulant agents.

Abbreviations

AS: 

Aortic stenosis

ICAM: 

Intercellular adhesion molecules

IL-1: 

Interleukin 1

IL-6: 

Interleukin-6

LV: 

Left ventriculum

NSAIDs: 

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

TNFa: 

Tumor necrosis factor alfa

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the contribution of all patients.

Funding

This work was supported by a doctoral grant from the Instituto Nacional de Cardiología “Ignacio Chavez”.

Availability of data and materials

The data on selected patients was acquired from out -patient and in-patient case-files stored at the Instituto Nacional de Cardiology Ignacio Chavez electronic database. Every patient that underwent a routine programmed valvular surgery were interviewed since admission, the cases were discussed in a medical surgical session and a week previous to surgery were evaluated by specialists that included an Otolaryngologist, odontologist, gynecologist for women and cultures were obtained to be sure there were no infections. The data were processed using SPSS 19 and Microsoft Excel software. The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on a judicious request.

Authors’ contribution

Each author made substantial contributions to the submitted work. Conception and design of study: MES, JVB, JS. Determination of cytokines were carried out by: RM RB. Optimization and initiation of echocardiography study JS, JVB. Performing acquisition of data: JS AR, Revision language VG and Analysis and interpretation of data: MES and JS Drafting the article and/or revising it critically for important intellectual and content: MES JS, JVB, RM, RB, VG and MES edited the revised version. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The data were obtained from the out-patient and in-patient case-files stored at the electronic database of the Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chavez, January 30 2015. The protocol was approved by Research and ethical committee of Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chavez (Protocol number S00-13). The methods and informed consent form were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and Institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Immunology Department, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología “Ignacio Chávez”
(2)
Echocardiography Department, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología “Ignacio Chávez”
(3)
Investigation Department, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología “Ignacio Chávez”
(4)
Intensive care Department, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología “Ignacio Chavez”
(5)
Department of Pathology, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología “Ignacio Chavez”
(6)
Department of Physiology, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología “Ignacio Chávez”

References

  1. Otto CM, Kuusisto J, Reichenback DD, Gown AM, O’Brien KD. Characterization of the early lesion of “degenerative” valvular aortic stenosis. Histological and immunohistochemical studies. Circulation. 1994;90:844–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Olsson M, Dalsgaard CJ, Haegerstrand A, Rosenqvist M, Ryden L, Nilsson J. Accumulation of T lymphocytes and expression of interleukin-2 receptors in nonrheumatic stenotic aortic valves. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:1162–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Mohler ERI, Gannon F, Reynolds C, Zimmerman R, Keane MG, Kaplan FS. Bone formation and inflammation in cardiac valves. Circulation. 2001;103:1522–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Shavelle DM, Katz R, Takasu J, et al. Soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1) and aortic valve calcification in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA)J Heart Valve Dis. 2008;17:388–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Galeone A, Brunetti G, Oranger A, et al. Aortic valvular interstitial cells apoptosis and calcification are mediated by TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand. Int J Cardiol. 2013;169:296–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kaden JJ, Dempfle CE, Grobholz R, et al. Interleukin-1 beta promotes matrix metalloproteinase expression and cell proliferation in calcific aortic valve stenosis. Atherosclerosis. 2003;170:205–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gerber I, Stewart R, Hammett C, et al. Effect of aortic valve replacement on C - reactive protein in nonrheumatic aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2003;92:1129–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Erdoes G, Lippuner C, Kocsis I, et al. Technical approach determines inflammatory response after surgical and trans catheter aortic valve replacement. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0143089. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143089.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Agmon Y, Khandheria BK, Jamil Tajik A, et al. Inflammation, infection, and aortic valve sclerosis; insights from the Olmsted County (Minnesota) population. Atherosclerosis. 2004;174:337–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kastellanos SS, Toumpoulis IK, Aggeli C, et al. The role of sex and biochemical markers of inflammation in left ventricular remodeling, before and after surgery, in elderly patients with aortic valve stenosis. Hell J Cardiol. 2009;50:26–36.Google Scholar
  11. Ramamurthi A, Pandian NG, Gangadharamurthy D, et al. The syndrome of degenerative calcific aortic stenosis: prevalence of multiple pathophysiologic disorders in association with valvular stenosis and their implications. Echocardiography. 2013;30:1–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol. 2008;20:86–100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Barone A, Benktander J, Teneberg S, Breimer ME. Characterization of acid and non-acid glycosphingolipids of porcine heart valve cusps as potential immune targets in biological heart valve grafts. Xenotransplantation. 2014;21:510–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Vesely I. Heart valve tissue engineering. Circ Res. 2005;97:743–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Schanen B, Karakoti A, Drake D, et al. Exposure to titanium dioxide Nanomaterials provokes inflammation of an in vitro human immune construct. ACS Nano. 2009;3:2523–32.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:e57–185.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Crowther JR. ELISA. Theory and practice. Methods Mol. Biol. 1995;42:1–218.Google Scholar
  18. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28:1–39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Lim HG, Kim SH, Choi SY, Kim YJ. Anticalcification effects of decellularization, solvent, and detoxification treatment for genipin and glutaraldehyde fixation of bovine pericardium. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;41:383–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lim HG, Kim GB, Jeong S, Kim YJ. Development of a next-generation tissue valve using a glutaraldehyde-fixed porcine aortic valve treated with decellularization, α-galactosidase, space filler, organic solvent and detoxification. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;48:104–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Elizondo DR, Boland ED, Ambrus JR, Kurk JL. Mechanical cardiac valve prostheses: wear characteristics and magnitudes in three bileaflet valves. J Heart Valve Dis. 1996;1:S115–23.Google Scholar
  22. Pathak CP, Adams AK, Simpson T, Phillips Jr RE, Moore MA. Treatment of bioprosthetic heart valve tissue with long chain alcohol solution to lower calcification potential. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2004;69:140–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Takagi M, Tamaki Y, Hasegawa H, et al. Toll-like receptors in the interface membrane around loosening total hip replacement implants. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007;81:1017–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kim YS, Shin SY, Moon SK, Yang SM. Surface properties correlated with the human gingival fibroblasts attachment on various materials for implantabutments: a multiple regression analysis. Acta Odontol Scand. 2015;73:38–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Weingart D, Steinemann S, Schilli W, et al. Titanium deposition in regional lymph nodes after insertion of titanium screw implants in maxillofacial region. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994;23:450–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang JX, Fan YB, Gao Y, Hu QH, Wang TC. TiO2 nanoparticles translocation and potential toxicological effect in rats after intraarticular injection. Biomaterials. 2009;30:4590–600.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ze Y, Sheng L, Zhao X, et al. TiO2 nanoparticles induced hippocampal neuroinflammation in mice. PLoS One. 2014;9:e92230.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Rodriguez Bacci M, Murad N, Breda JR, et al. Inflammatory biomarker kinetic after mechanical and biopsothetic valve replacement. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2015;61:58–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang J, Ma J, Dong L, Hou Y, Jia X, Niu X, Fan Y. Effect of anatase TiO2 nanoparticles on the growth of RSC-364 rat synovial cell. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2013;13:3874–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Bloomfield P, Wheatley DJ, Prescott RJ, et al. Twelve yeaqr comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:573–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hammermeister KE, Sethi GK, Henderson WG, et al. Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the veterans affairs. Randomized Trial J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:1152–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Schoen FJ, Hobson CE. Anatomic analysis of removed prosthetic heart valves: causes of failure of 33 mechanical valves and 58 bioprostheses. 1980 to 1983. Hum Pathol. 1985;16:549.Google Scholar
  33. Schoen FJ, Golomb Levy RJ. Calcification of bio prosthetic heart valves: a perspective on models. J Heart Valve Dis. 1992;1:110–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Bernacca GM, Tobsanick G, Wheatley DJ, et al. Dynamic in-vitro calcification of porcine valve casps. J Heart Valve Dis. 1994;3:684–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Walley VM, Keon WJ, et al. Patterns of failure in Ionescu-Shiley bovine pericardial bioprosthetic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1987;93:925–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Zilla P, Weissenstein C, Human P, Dower T, et al. High glutaraldehyde concentrations mitigate bioprosthetic root calcification in the sheep model. Ann Thorac Sur. 2000;70:2091–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Kastellanos SS, Toumpoulis IK, Aggeli C, et al. Time course of C reactive protein, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1.Following the surgical treatment of patients with aoirtic valve stenosis. Hellenie J Cardiol. 2007;48:5–14.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement