Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Rationale and design of a randomised clinical trial for an extended cardiac rehabilitation programme using telemonitoring: the TeleCaRe study

BMC Cardiovascular DisordersBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:175

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-016-0345-9

Received: 7 April 2016

Accepted: 11 August 2016

Published: 6 September 2016

Abstract

Background

Despite the known positive effects of cardiac rehabilitation and an active lifestyle, evidence is emerging that it is difficult to attain and sustain the minimum recommendations of leisure time physical activity. The long-term benefits are often disappointing due to lack of adherence to the changes in life style. Qualitative research on patients’ perspectives suggests that motivation for lifestyle change tends to diminish around 3 months after the index-event. The time most cardiac rehabilitation programmes end. The aim of the present study is to determine if prolongation of a traditional cardiac rehabilitation programme with additional heart rate based telemonitoring guidance for a period of 6 months results in better long term effects on physical and mental outcomes, care consumption and quality of life than traditional follow-up.

Methods

In this single centre randomised controlled trial 120 patients with an absolute indication for cardiac rehabilitation will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to an intervention group with 6 months of heart rate based telemonitoring guidance or a control group with traditional follow-up after cardiac rehabilitation. The primary endpoint will be VO2peak after 12 months. Secondary endpoints are VO2peak after 6 months, quality of life, physical-, emotional- and social functioning, cardiac structure, traditional risk profile, compliance to the use of the heart rate belt and smartphone, MACE and care-consumption.

Discussion

The TeleCaRe study will provide insight into the added value of the prolongation of traditional cardiac rehabilitation with 6 months of heart rate based telemonitoring guidance.

Trial registration

Dutch Trial Register: NTR4644 (registered 06/12/14).

Keywords

Cardiac rehabilitationTelemonitoring and telecoachingVO2Cardio respiratory fitnessLeisure time physical activityRandomised controlled trial

Background

Despite the known positive effects of Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) and an active lifestyle, evidence is emerging that it is difficult to attain and sustain the minimum recommendations of Leisure Time Physical Activity (LTPA) [1, 2]. The long-term benefits of CR are often disappointing due to lack of adherence to the changes in life style [3, 4].

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading cause of death and a major cause of disability and lost productivity in adults worldwide [5]. The aging and growth of the population have offset reduction in cardiovascular mortality in the past decade [6].

Both LTPA and Cardio Respiratory Fitness (CRF) are inversely correlated with mortality [7]. Lee et al. evaluated the long-term effects of changes in CRF on cardiovascular mortality. They observed a significant reduction in cardiovascular mortality of 27 % and 42 %, respectively (compared to those with a loss of CRF) in individuals who had either no change or improvements in CRF. The mean interval between the baseline and last examination being 6.3 years. For every 1-MET (Metabolic Equivalent of Task) increase in CRF over time, all-cause and cardiovascular mortality were reduced by 15 % and 19 %, respectively, showing that even small improvements in CRF can have a substantial effect [8].

Qualitative research on patients’ perspectives suggests that motivation for lifestyle change tends to wane around 3 months after the event, when the initial shock has worn off, and most patients start feeling better [9]. In addition to the already low uptake of CR in the Netherlands median total training duration seems to be less than 3 months [10, 11]. Consolidating lifestyle habits require continued attention and appropriate guidance [3]. The transition of a supervised and structured training programme to a continuation without this guidance could be a possible explanation for the low compliance [12]. A better self-efficacy by telemonitoring could help them to be engaged in and actually perform healthy behaviour (e.g. exercise adherence).

The main aim of the present study is to determine whether prolongation of a traditional CR programme with heart rate based telemonitoring guidance for a period of 6 months results in better long-term effects on physical and mental outcomes, care consumption and quality of life (QOL). In order to see whether patients are able to sustain their CRF and LTPA levels after the telemonitoring intervention of 6 months, this will be followed by a 6-month period without telemonitoring guidance.

The primary objective of the study is to assess whether the addition of 6 months of heart rate based telemonitoring guidance to the traditional CR programme results in a higher peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) than a regular follow-up 12 months after CR. Secondary outcome parameters are: VO2peak at 6 months, cardiac structure and function, QOL, physical (LTPA level), emotional and social functioning, traditional risk profile, compliance to the use of the smartphone, adherence to the minimum recommendations of LTPA, care consumption (hospital admissions, outpatient clinic visits, general practitioner (GP) visits, cardiovascular interventions and lab testing) and Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE).

Methods

Design

This study is designed as a prospective single centre randomised controlled trial. Patients will be evaluated at baseline (T0), after 26 weeks (T1) and 12 months (T2) after randomisation. Figure 1 provides a flowchart of the study protocol. The study complies with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki on ethics in medical research and is approved by the medical ethics committee of Isala (NL48475.075.14; 14.0334). Clinical Trial Registration: NTR4644.
Fig. 1

Flowchart, illustrating randomisation and testing at different time points

Patients

The study will enrol in total 120 patients referred to the CR centre of Isala Zwolle. Patients with a minimal attendance of 80 % in the exercise programme, a signed written informed consent and one of the following indications for CR (acute coronary syndrome (ACS), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) within 3 months prior to the start of the CR programme) will be included. All patients assessed for eligibility will be registered. Exclusion criteria are a contraindication to CR according to the Dutch national guideline, mental impairment leading to inability to cooperate, severe impaired (musculoskeletal) ability to exercise, signs of cardiac ischemia and/or positive exercise testing on cardiac ischemia, insufficient knowledge of the Dutch language, no access, availability or insufficient knowledge of a computer with internet or an implanted cardiac device (pacemaker, ICD) [13].

Sample size

Preliminary calculations suggest that for an expected difference in VO2peak of 3.0 ml/kg/min between the control and intervention group with an estimated standard deviation of 4.8 ml/min/kg, assuming 90 % power and 5 % significance level (α = 0.05), a total of 108 patients is needed to detect a beneficial effect of telemonitoring. These numbers are based on a previous study that shows the effects of 52 weeks of CR with combined supervised and unsupervised exercise sessions [14]. Taking into account a 10 % dropout we plan to randomise 60 patients in each group.

Randomisation

At the end of the regular CR programme, patients meeting the in- and exclusion criteria will be informed and requested to participate. After receiving written informed consent, patients will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to the intervention group with telemonitoring guidance or the control group with a traditional follow-up programme by means of a computerised allocation system applying an algorithm that prevented the care providers or the investigators from predicting the outcome of the randomisation process. This means that the person, who determines if the patient is eligible, at the time of this decision, is unaware of which group the patient will be allocated to. The patient and care providers are not blinded to the intervention.

Telemonitoring/coaching

Patients in the intervention group are equipped with a smartphone (Samsung Galaxy Ace GT-s5830i, Korea) and Bluetooth connected heart rate monitor (Zephyr, Annapolis, USA). Therefore the device is able to register training mode, training time and also training intensity. The subjects receive a personal moderate to high intensity heart rate zone based on their Cardio Pulmonary Exercise Test (CPET) at T0 and are free to choose which type of exercise they are going to do. Moderate intensity will be defined as an intensity above their individual first ventilatory threshold [15]. The patients in the intervention group will be advised to exercise at least 30 min a day 5 days a week in the above mentioned training zone. During exercise, type of exercise, heart rate and duration will be registered. Afterwards, patients are requested to score their perceived exertion of training (BORG score). Data will be transferred to a secured website through a secured wireless connection (CE registration NL-CAOO2-2014-32838; ISO 27001). Patients will have access to their individual webpage and their training history on the smartphone. Here they are able to see how much and with which intensity they have exercised. They will be contacted by telephone weekly in the first month, every other week in the second month and from then on every month until T1. During these telephone calls (10 in total) patients receive further advice on how to improve their LTPA level. The nurses discuss the exercise data and use motivational interviewing to motivate and stimulate the patient.

Traditional follow-up

Traditional follow-up after CR consists of one out-patient visit 3 months after hospitalisation. During this visit medication is checked, information about the diagnosis is given and possible complaints are discussed. If necessary addition testing and extra visits are scheduled.

Cardio pulmonary exercise testing

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing will be performed every visit in both groups using individualised cycle ergometer ramp protocols on an electro-magnetically braked cycle ergometer (Lode Corrival, Lode, Groningen, the Netherlands). Twelve-lead ECG is recorded continuously and blood pressure is measured every 3 min. Oxygen consumption and CO2 production will be measured breath-by-breath by ventilatory gas exchange (Metalyzer 3b, Cortex Biophysics GmbH, Leipzig, Germany).

All patients start with 1 min of rest, thereafter 2 min of unloaded cycling, an individualised ramp protocol in order to reach VO2peak between 8 and 12 min, 1 min of complete rest to measure Heart Rate Recovery (HRR) and finally a recovery period of 4 min. Patients will be encouraged to exercise until levelling off of VO2 despite an increase in workload and/or to a respiratory exchange ratio >1.10. Afterwards, patients are asked to quantify their rate of perceived exertion according to the original BORG score. Peak VO2 will be determined as the mean value of the final 30 s of exercise. The following criteria will be used to correlate the CPET at different time points: <100 ml increase VO2 in the last minute, RER (Respiratory Exchange Ratio) ≥ 1.10, BORG ≥ 17, HR (Heart Rate) > 85 % predicted.

Medical history, physical examination and additional testing

Medical history, medication and co-morbidities will be screened every visit. During each visit physical examination length, weight and blood pressure (manual auscultation in seated position) will be measured. Waist and hip circumference will be measured and skinfold thickness will be determined (biceps, triceps, sub-scapular, supra-iliac) to calculate lean body mass [16]. Furthermore resting electrocardiogram (supine position) and lung function test will be executed [17].

Echocardiography

Echocardiographic parameters for cardiac structure and function will be measured at T0 and T2.

Structure

From the 2-dimensional echocardiogram, diameter of the aorta, left atrium, left ventricle at end-diastole (LVED) and at end-systole (LVES), end-diastolic wall thickness of the intraventricular septum (IVS), and left ventricular posterior wall (LVPW) will be measured in the parasternal long-axis view, tracing of the area of the left atrium, and diameter of the vena cava inferior at end expiration will be measured in the subcostal view, respectively.

Systolic function

Ejection fraction will be calculated using the formula: (LVEDV–LVESV/LVEDV), where left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) from 2-dimensional echocardiograms in the apical 4-chamber view will be determined using the biplane Simpson rule method.

Diastolic function

Standard LV inflow pulsed-wave Doppler measurements at the mitral leaflet tips, including peak flow velocity of the early rapid filling wave (E[−wave]), peak flow velocity of the late filling wave due to atrial contraction (A[−wave]), the E/A ratio,(early deceleration time), and isovolumetric relaxation time will be measured to assess global diastolic function. In addition left atrium inflow pulsed wave velocity Doppler measurements will be obtained, including pulmonary venous flow velocities in both diastole (D) and systole (S), and the S/D ratio. To measure myocardial relaxation, pulsed-wave TDI measurements at the septal and lateral mitral annulus will be obtained.

Questionnaires

Subjects will be asked to fill in several validated questionnaires to assess general health. This includes QOL (KVL-H), physical functioning (IPAQ-long version), emotional functioning (PHQ-9, HADS) and social functioning (MPSS) [18]. These questionnaires will be completed at baseline and after 6 and 12 months.

Blood analysis

Venous blood samples will be obtained after an overnight fasting period at baseline, after 6 and 12 months. Total cholesterol, serum triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, ApoB, HbA1c and glucose are analysed by the biochemical laboratory using standard procedures for the analyses.

Adverse events

All adverse events will be registered and serious adverse events (SAE) will also be reported continuously to the Contract Research Organisation (CRO) Diagram. SAE are defined as cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, near sudden cardiac death, ACS, CV intervention/surgery, CV hospital admission and CV emergency visit.

Care consumption and MACE

The occurrence of events (cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, near sudden cardiac death, ACS, CV Intervention/surgery, CV hospital admission, CV emergency visits) and consumption of care (admission days, outpatient clinic visits, GP visits, interventions, radiology, nuclear and lab testing) will be collected by a (monthly) telephone call with the participants throughout the study period and patients’ electronic medical files.

Data handling

eDream®, an electronic data capture and clinical data management programme (electronic case report form) will be used to collect and store the data. The database will be hosted and secured on the servers of Diagram and is on-line accessible.

Statistics

All parameters will be analysed on the intention-to-treat principle. All patients will be analysed in the group they are randomised to. Categorical variables will be summarised by frequency and percentages. Continuous variables will be summarised by mean and standard deviation as well as median and interquartile range.

The primary treatment comparison is telemonitoring group versus control group. Student’s t-tests will be used to examine whether the continuous variables are different between the intervention groups at baseline, at 6 months and at 12 months. When necessary the continuous variables will be transformed to obtain a normal distribution, or a non-parametric test will be used (Wilcoxon rank-sum test). Chi Square tests or Fisher’s exact tests as appropriate will be used to examine whether the categorical variables are different between the intervention groups at baseline, at 6 months and at 12 months.

Time until MACE will be described by Kaplan Meier curves. The Kaplan Meier curves will indicate the occurrence of MACE during 1 year of follow-up. Patients who do not experience an event or are lost to follow-up without an event are censored. Differences in survival distributions between the telemonitoring and control group will be tested using logrank tests.

A two-sided p-value of less than 0.05 will be considered to be statistically significant in all analyses. Analyses will be performed with Statistical Analysis System, SAS, version 9.3 and with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, IBM) version 22.0.

Preliminary results

Patient demographics and reasons to refrain from participation are shown in Tables 1 and 2. Preliminary results show that 122 of 299 (40.8 %) consecutive patients meeting the in- and exclusion criteria were willing to participate. They are on average 59 years of age and predominantly male (82,5 %). Main reasons to refrain from participation are the time investment and doubts concerning the added value.
Table 1

Patient demographics

 

Screened

Included

Number (%)

Patients screened

299

122

Men

232 (77.7)

101 (82.8)

Women

67 (22.4)

21 (17.2)

Age (mean years)

63.7

59.6

Table 2

Reasons to refrain from participation

 

Number (%)

Too time consuming

64 (36)

Not convinced of added value

40 (23)

Insufficient computer knowledge

25 (14)

Follow-up in a different location

12 (7)

Physical impairment

12 (7)

Too much traveling time

7 (4)

Problems with coping

6 (3)

Holiday > 1 month or abroad during follow up

5 (3)

Heart rate belt is too much stress

3 (2)

Unknown

3 (2)

Discussion

The long term benefits of lifestyle interventions are often disappointing due to lack of adherence and persistent change in life style. Qualitative research on patients’ perspectives suggests that motivation for lifestyle changes tends to wane 3 months after the event. Most Dutch CR programmes though last less than 3 months.

Several studies showed that telehealth interventions after traditional CR provide an effective risk factor reduction in secondary prevention. They showed promising results in encouraging patients to stay active after the acute rehabilitation phase [1921]. Moreover Frederix et al. and Kraal et al. showed that Telerehabilitation appears to be a feasible and effective additional and/or alternative form of rehabilitation, which is more effective and efficient than centre based CR alone [22, 23]. The TeleCaRe study differentiates itself from other telehealth studies by the length of the guidance and the follow up after the intervention in combination with the possibility to monitor type, volume and intensity of LTPA. Only a few studies looked at a follow-up period after the telemonitoring period without an intervention and as a result it is still unclear if telehealth interventions induce persistent lifestyle change. Moreover by measuring heart rate during exercise we are, contrary to studies using a motion sensor, able to monitor and coach patients to exercise in the right exercise intensity zone and correlate exercise intensity to outcome parameters [15, 24].

The TeleCaRe study evaluates the effects of extending a traditional CR programme with telemonitoring guidance for a period of 6 months with a follow-up of 6 months without support. The main aim of the study is to determine if this extension results in better long-term effects on physical and mental outcomes, care consumptions and QOL than the regular follow-up after cardiac rehabilitation.

Abbreviations

ACS: 

Acute coronary syndrome

CABG: 

Coronary artery bypass grafting

CPET: 

Cardio pulmonary exercise test

CR: 

Cardiac rehabilitation

CRF: 

Cardio respiratory fitness

CRO: 

Contract research organisation

CVD: 

Cardiovascular diseases

GP: 

General practitioner

HADS: 

Hospital anxiety and depressions scale

HR: 

Heart rate

HRR: 

Heart rate recovery

ICD: 

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator

IPAQ: 

International physical activity questionnaire

IVS: 

Intra ventricular septum

LTPA: 

Leisure time physical activity

LVED: 

Left ventricle at end-diastole

LVES: 

Left ventricle at end-systole

LVPW: 

Left ventricular posterior wall

MACE: 

Major adverse cardiac events

MET: 

Metabolic equivalent of task

MPSS: 

Mood and physical symptom scale

PCI: 

Percutaneous coronary intervention

PHQ: 

Patient health questionnaire

QOL: 

Quality of life

RER: 

Respiratory exchange ratio

SAE: 

Serious adverse events

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work is supported by AstraZeneca.

Authors’ contributions

EM, LP and EK had the basic idea for this study and were involved in the development of the protocol. JS, EM and LP drafted the manuscript. All authors were involved in the critical revision of the paper for intellectual content and its final approval before submission.

Authors' information

Not applicable.

Competing interests

de Kluiver is shareholder of the company that provides the hardware and software (HC@Home) used in the study. He is not involved in the implementation of the study and has no contact with the study participants. Other authors: none to declare.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study complies with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki on ethics in medical research and is approved by the medical ethics committee of Isala (NL48475.075.14). Clinical Trial Registration: NTR4644. All patients signed a written informed consent.

Data

All relevant raw data, will be freely available to any scientist wishing to use them for non-commercial purposes.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Sports Medicine Department, Isala
(2)
Cardiology Department, Isala Heart Centre
(3)
Cardiology Department, Radboud UMC
(4)
Diagram
(5)
Physiology Department, Radboud UMC

References

  1. Heran BS, Chen JM, Ebrahim S, Moxham T, Oldridge N, Rees K, Thompson DR, Taylor RS. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;7(7):CD001800.Google Scholar
  2. Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair SN, Katzmarzyk PT, Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):219–29.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Janssen V, De Gucht V, van Exel H, Maes S. Beyond resolutions? A randomized controlled trial of a self-regulation lifestyle programme for post-cardiac rehabilitation patients. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013;20(3):431–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hansen D, Dendale P, Raskin A, Schoonis A, Berger J, Vlassak I, Meeusen R. Long-term effect of rehabilitation in coronary artery disease patients: randomized clinical trial of the impact of exercise volume. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24(4):319–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJ. Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet. 2006;367(9524):1747–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Roth GA, Forouzanfar MH, Moran AE, Barber R, Nguyen G, Feigin VL, Naghavi M, Mensah GA, Murray CJ. Demographic and epidemiologic drivers of global cardiovascular mortality. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(14):1333–41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Lee DC, Sui X, Ortega FB, Kim YS, Church TS, Winett RA, Ekelund U, Katzmarzyk PT, Blair SN. Comparisons of leisure-time physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness as predictors of all-cause mortality in men and women. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(6):504–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Lee DC, Sui X, Artero EG, Lee IM, Church TS, McAuley PA, Stanford FC, Kohl 3rd HW, Blair SN. Long-term effects of changes in cardiorespiratory fitness and body mass index on all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in men: the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study. Circulation. 2011;124(23):2483–90.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Gregory S, Bostock Y, Backett-Milburn K. Recovering from a heart attack: a qualitative study into lay experiences and the struggle to make lifestyle changes. Fam Pract. 2006;23(2):220–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. van Engen-Verheul M, de Vries H, Kemps H, Kraaijenhagen R, de Keizer N, Peek N. Cardiac rehabilitation uptake and its determinants in the Netherlands. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012;20(2):349–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Vromen T, Spee RF, Kraal JJ, Peek N, van Engen-Verheul MM, Kraaijenhagen RA, Gijsbers HJ, Kemps HM. Exercise training programs in Dutch cardiac rehabilitation centres. Neth Heart J. 2013;21(3):138–43.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Sarkar U, Ali S, Whooley MA. Self-efficacy as a marker of cardiac function and predictor of heart failure hospitalization and mortality in patients with stable coronary heart disease: findings from the Heart and Soul Study. Health Psychol. 2009;28(2):166–73.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Commissie Cardiovasculaire Preventie en Hartrevalidatie van de Nederlandse Vereniging voor Cardiologie. Multidisciplinaire Richtlijn Hartrevalidatie 2011. Utrecht: Nederlandse Vereniging Voor Cardiologie, Revalidatiecommissie NHS/NVVC en projectgroep PAAHR; 2011.Google Scholar
  14. Hamm LF, Kavanagh T, Campbell RB, Mertens DJ, Beyene J, Kennedy J, Shephard RJ. Timeline for peak improvements during 52 weeks of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2004;24(6):374–80. quiz 381–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Mezzani A, Hamm LF, Jones AM, McBride PE, Moholdt T, Stone JA, Urhausen A, Williams MA, European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention, Rehabilitation, American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation. Aerobic exercise intensity assessment and prescription in cardiac rehabilitation: a joint position statement of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013;20(3):442–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Durnin JV, Womersley J. Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years. Br J Nutr. 1974;32(1):77–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Anonymous. Standardization of Spirometry, 1996 Update. American Thoracic Society. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;152(3):1107–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Hallal PC, Victora CG. Reliability and validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(3):556.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Frederix I, Van Driessche N, Hansen D, Berger J, Bonne K, Alders T, Dendale P. Increasing the medium-term clinical benefits of hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation by physical activity telemonitoring in coronary artery disease patients. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015;22(2):150–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Zutz A, Ignaszewski A, Bates J, Lear SA. Utilization of the internet to deliver cardiac rehabilitation at a distance: a pilot study. Telemed J E Health. 2007;13(3):323–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Woodend AK, Sherrard H, Fraser M, Stuewe L, Cheung T, Struthers C. Telehome monitoring in patients with cardiac disease who are at high risk of readmission. Heart Lung. 2008;37(1):36–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Frederix I, Vanhees L, Dendale P, Goetschalckx K. A review of telerehabilitation for cardiac patients. J Telemed Telecare. 2015;21(1):45–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Frederix I, Hansen D, Coninx K, Vandervoort P, Vandijck D, Hens N, Van Craenenbroeck E, Van Driessche N, Dendale P. Effect of comprehensive cardiac telerehabilitation on one-year cardiovascular rehospitalization rate, medical costs and quality of life: A cost-effectiveness analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015;23(7):674–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gebel K, Ding D, Chey T, Stamatakis E, Brown WJ, Bauman AE. Effect of moderate to vigorous physical activity on all-cause mortality in middle-aged and older Australians. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(6):970–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement