Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Prevalence and risk factors of premature coronary artery disease in patients undergoing coronary angiography in Kurdistan, Iraq

  • Ameen Mosa Mohammad1Email author,
  • Hekmat Izzat Jehangeer2 and
  • Sabri Khalif Shaikhow1
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders201515:155

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-015-0145-7

Received: 15 May 2015

Accepted: 9 November 2015

Published: 18 November 2015

Abstract

Background

Premature coronary artery disease (PCAD) seems to increase, particularly in developing countries. Given the lack of such studies in the country, this study examines the prevalence, associated cardiovascular risk factors, and coronary angiographic profile of the disease in Iraq.

Methods

Data was collected from a total of 445 adult patients undergoing coronary angiography at Duhok Heart Center, Kurdistan in a period between March and September 2014. Patients were divided into PCAD (male <45 years and female < 55 years) and mature coronary artery disease (MCAD).

Results

The prevalence of the angiographically documented PCAD was 31 %. The PCAD had higher rates of hyperlipidemia (p = 0.04), positive family history of coronary artery disease (p = 0.002), type A lesions (p = 0.02), single vessel disease (p = 0.01) and medical treatment (p = 0.01) than the MCAD. Logistic regression model indicated that male sex (OR 3.38, C.I 1.96–7.22), smoking (OR 2.08, C.I 1.05–4.12), hypertension (OR 1.58, C.I 1.25–2.03), hyperlipidemia (OR 1.89, C.I 1.17–2.42) and positive family history of coronary artery disease (OR 2.62, C.I 1.38–9.54) were associated with the PCAD. Sensitivity analysis showed highest specificity (94.2 %) and positive predictive value (96.5 %) in patients with coronary stenosis >70 % compared to lesser obstruction.

Conclusions

Premature coronary artery disease is alarming  in the country. Cardiovascular risk factors are clustered among them. But the angiographic profile and therapeutic options of PCAD are close to those reported from previous studies.

Keywords

Premature coronary artery disease Cardiovascular risk factors Coronary angiography Kurdistan Iraq

Background

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. CAD is a disease usually found in the old. Nowadays, however, it’s often encountered by young adults. It is estimated that about 4–10 % of individuals with documented CAD are less than 45 years [1, 2].

The PCAD is defined, in various studies, as having an age of onset ranging from 30 to 56 years. Clinical studies have affirmed that patients with PCAD have a different clinical presentation, associated CAD risk factors, and coronary angiographic profile compared with the MCAD [24].

Patients with PCAD belong to a particular subgroup that needs much more attention since its impact on individuals, families and the society is devastating. Studies on PCAD in certain countries may vary relevant to the populations studied, and the data on PCAD available in Iraq is scarce. This study was aimed at examining the prevalence, clinical presentations, associated cardiovascular risk factors, coronary angiographic profile, and therapeutic options in the PCAD compared to MCAD.

Methods

Patients’ recruitment

We examined in this cross sectional study a total of 445 clinically diagnosed CAD patients who underwent coronary angiography (CAG) at Duhok Heart Center, Kurdistan, Iraq in the period between March and September 2014. Inclusion criteria included all patients aged ≥18 years, presented with CAD/acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and underwent CAG based on the ACC/ESC indications for CAG for the first time whose coronary angiograms revealed documented coronary lesions [5, 6]. A total of 303 cases (178 men and 125 women) with a mean age 53.8 (SD 5.8) were met these criteria and provided written informed consent. From the recruited sample, 97 cases had normal angiograms and other 45 had prior coronary revascularization (PCI or CABG) and both were excluded from the study (see Fig. 1). CAD manifested in male <45 years and in female < 55 years old was defined a PCAD. Patients were divided into PCAD and MCAD group and the premature group was subdivided into males and females for comparison.
Fig. 1

Flow chart of patients’ recruitment. A total of 445 cases were enrolled. 97 cases had normal angiograms and other 45 had prior coronary revascularization and both were excluded

Clinical presentations and cardiovascular risk factors

Clinical presentations of patient were classified into chronic stable angina, prior acute coronary syndromes including unstable angina (UA), NSTEMI, and STEMI. Patients were checked for obesity, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, smoking, and family history of coronary artery disease. Diagnoses of these clinical presentations and cardiovascular risk factors were based on international standard definitions [714].

Coronary angiography

Diagnostic CAG was performed by a team of expert interventional cardiologists. A detailed analysis of angiographic images was done by the operators. Both eye-balling method and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) were used to estimate the percentage, morphology and length of the coronary lesions. The patients were grouped according the number of major epicardial coronary arteries into one vessel disease (1VD), two vessels disease (2VD), three vessels disease (3VD) or four vessels disease including left main stem (LMS) (4VD). Stenosis of the coronary vessels was considered mild when the luminal diameter was reduced by (<50 %), moderate (50–70 %), and severe >70 % of the original diameter. Complexity of lesions was further categorized according to the joint American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) classification system into: Type A, B and C lesions [15].

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was performed by using Microsoft Office Excel 2007and SPSS for Windows, version 16.0. Chicago. Continuous variables were calculated as mean ± (SD), and categorical variables were presented as counts and percentages. A chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. A student t- test was used for continuous variables. A logistic regression model was used to identify risk factors of premature CAD. P-value < 0.05 was regarded as significant. Sensitivity analysis was performed between different categories of coronary artery stenosis percents. The study was approved by the ethical committee at the School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Duhok, Kurdistan, Iraq.

Results

Comparison between patients with premature and Mature CAD

Prevalence of PCAD is (31 %). Their mean age is 44.2 (SD 5.2). Concerning male sex and STEMI as a clinical presentation, there were a statistical significant difference between the premature and mature CAD (p < 0.001, 0.029). There was a significantly higher prevalence rate of diabetes mellitus among MCAD (p = 0.002), but a significantly higher rates of hyperlipidemia and positive family history of CAD among PCAD with (p = 0.048, 0.002) respectively. Angiographically, there were higher rates of 1 VD, type A lesions and mild coronary stenosis among the PCAD. However, the rates of 3VD and 4VD, type C lesion, and moderate/severe coronary stenosis were significantly higher among the MCAD. CABG seemed to be significantly more common among patients with MCAD (p = 0.035). However, medical treatment was more advocated for PCAD (Table 1).
Table 1

Comparison between patients with premature and mature CAD

Patient characteristics

Total 303 (100 %)

Premature CAD

Mature CAD

p-value

94(31 %)

209(69 %)

Mean age ± SD

53.8 + 5.8

44.2 ± 5.2

63.5 ± 6.4

<0.001

Males

178(58.7)

40(42)

138(66)

<0.001

Clinical presentation

Stable angina

60(19.8.)

23(24.4)

37(17.7)

0.085

UA/or NSTEMI

130(42.9)

41(43.6)

89(42.5)

0.433

STEMI

114(37.6)

30(32)

84(40)

0.029

Risk factors

Hypertension

140(46)

47(50)

93(44.5)

0.187

Diabetes mellitus

77(25)

14(14.8)

63(30)

0.002

Smoking

81(26)

28(30)

53(25)

0.210

Obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m2)

116(38)

38(40)

78(37)

0.303

Hyperlipidemia

69(22)

27(28.7)

42(20)

0.048

FH of PCAD

50(16)

24(25.5)

26(12.5)

0.002

Angiographic characters

Severity of number of lesions

<50 %

142(21.1)

82(47.4)

60(12)

<0.001

(50–70 %)

113(16.8)

19(11)

94(18.8)

0.003

>70 %

418(62.1)

72(41.6)

346(69.2)

<0.001

Type of lesions

Type A

203(30.2)

62(35.8)

130(27.8)

0.024

Type B

276(41)

71(41.1)

194(41.5)

0.454

Type C

194(28.8)

40(23.1)

143(30.6)

0.031

Number of major coronary arteries

Involved

1VD

109(36)

49(52)

60(28.7)

0.011

2VD

60(20)

20(21)

40(19)

0.320

3VD

92(30)

16(17)

76(36)

<0.001

4VD

42(14)

9(10)

33(16)

0.018

Coronary arteries

Involved

LMS

42(6.2)

9(5)

33(6.6)

0.256

LAD

268(39.8)

74(42)

194(38.8)

0.219

LCX

170(25.2)

40(23)

130(26)

0.252

RCA

193(28.6)

50(29)

143(28.6)

0.436

Therapeutic options

PCI

158(52)

46(49)

112(54)

0.226

CABG

42(14)

8(9)

34(16)

0.035

Medical treatment

103(34)

40(42)

63(30)

0.017

Comparison between males and females with PCAD

While obesity was significantly more common among females (p = 0.038), smoking was obviously more prevalent among males with PCAD (p <0.001). There was a significantly higher rate of STEMI among males (p = 0.029) as well as the rates of 3VD and 4VD were higher among them (p = 0.011 and 0.027) respectively. Therapeutic options showed no significant statistical differences between the two subgroups (Table 2).
Table 2

Comparison between males and females with premature CAD

Patient characteristics

Males 40(42.5 %)

Females 54(57.5 %)

P-value

Mean age ± SD

40.1 + 4.1

48.3 + 6.3

<0.001

Clinical presentation

Stable angina

9(22)

14(26)

0.351

UA/or NSTEMI

14(35)

27(50)

0.073

STEMI

17(43)

13(24)

0.029

Risk factors

Hypertension

20(50)

27(50)

0.500

Diabetes mellitus

5(12.5)

9(17)

0.287

Smoking

24(60)

4(7)

<0.001

Obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m2)

12(30)

26(48)

0.038

Hyperlipidemia

11(28)

16(29)

0.410

FH of PCAD

10(25)

14(26)

0.459

Angiographic characters

Severity of number of lesions

<50 %

40(46.5)

42(48.3)

0.408

50 %–70 %

8(9.3)

11(12.6)

0.241

>70 %

38(44.2)

34(39)

0.247

Type of lesions

Type A

26(30.2)

36(41.4)

0.063

Type B

38(44.2)

33(37.9)

0.201

Type C

22(25.6)

18(20.7)

0.222

Number of major coronary arteries

Involved

1VD

16(40)

33(61)

0.229

2VD

8(20)

12(22)

0.374

3VD

10(25)

6(11)

0.011

4VD

6(15)

3(5)

0.027

Coronary arteries

Involved

LMS

6(6.9)

3(3.4)

0.148

LAD

37(43)

37(42.5)

0.172

LCX

18(20.9)

22(25.3)

0.364

RCA

25(29)

25(28.7)

0.100

Therapeutic options

PCI

19(47.5)

27(50)

0.405

CABG

5(12.5)

3(6)

0.116

Medical treatment

16(40)

24(44)

0.333

Risk factors of PCAD

Using PCAD as a dependent variable, independent CAD risk factors among PCAD including male gender, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, hyperlipidemia, and family history of CAD were assessed by logistic regression model. The analysis revealed that male gender, hypertension, smoking, hyperlipidemia, and family history of CAD were independent risk factors for PCAD (Ps < 0.05) (Table 3).
Table 3

Logistic regression model of CAD risk factors in premature CAD

CAD risk factors

Odds ratio

Confidence interval

p-value

Male gender

3.3807

1.9644 to 7.2263

<0.001

FH of CADa

2.6211

1.3872 to 9.5412

0.0113

Hyperlipidemia

1.8963

1.1770 to 2.4271

0.0249

Smoking

2.0840

1.0520 to 4.1281

0.0353

Hypertension

1.5896

1.2517 to 2.0365

0.0485

aFH = Family History

Sensitivity analysis of different categories of coronary artery stenosis showed highest specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) in patients with coronary stenosis >70 % obstruction compared to other categories of lesser obstruction (Table 4).
Table 4

Sensitivity analysis of different categories of coronary stenosis

Coronary stenosis (%)

Sensitivity %

Specificity %

PPVa %

NPVb %

Accuracy %

<50 %

96.2

90.7

92.0

94.4

95.2

≥50 %–≤ 70 %

95.1

91.2

93.6

92.7

94.3

>70 %

91.4

94.2

96.5

89.9

93.8

aPPV = Positive predictive value. bNPV = Negative predictive value

Discussion

This study showed an alarming higher rate of PCAD compared to most of reports and studies conducted worldwide. This rate is higher than rates reported by Mohammad et al. from Iraq, Prashanth et al. from Oman and Al-Nozha et al. from Suadia Arabia [1618]. At the same time it is much higher than the reported rates of documented CAD in young populations in USA, India, China and Japan [1922]. On the contrary, it is lower only than the rate reported exclusively by Zahrni et al. who found 55 % of CAD in Malaysian is of premature onset, and this is probably related to the mean age difference between both studies [23]. The age of PCAD presentation in the current study is much younger than the mean age for Zahrni et al., and is comparable to Roxona Sadeghi et al. from Iran [23, 24].

In consistence with the results found by Zahrni et al., Tahir et al., and Prashanth et al., the current study showed higher incidence of ACS compared to chronic stable angina among premature group [17, 23, 25]. But Abu Siddique et al. showed higher rates of chronic stable angina and not ACS among PCAD [26]. Interestingly among the latter group, males are more likely to present with STEMI as compared to females. This finding has also been demonstrated in other observational and retrospective analyses worldwide. This group of patients represents an area for further study and possible future interventions. Currently, there are prospective studies ongoing to evaluate subclinical markers of atherosclerosis and indeed some currently unknown risk factors may be responsible for this finding [27, 28].

This study, like Nafakhi though unlike Abu Siddique et al., revealed no significant difference in the prevalence of hypertension between premature and mature CAD [26, 29]. Noeman et al. found similar rate to the current study of hypertension among PCAD in Pakistan [30]. Compared to Prashanth et al. and Mahnoosh Foroughi et al., while this study found a lower rate of obesity among PCAD, it concluded a similar one among female gender [17, 31]. This gender difference could be attributed to many etiologies including cultural customs and social norms of the society.

The study, in accordance with Tahir et al. and Badran et al., showed a significant difference in the prevalence of diabetes mellitus between premature and mature CAD. Unlike Badran et al., however, it showed no significant gender difference of prevalence of diabetes mellitus in the PCAD [25, 32]. Besides, the study showed a significantly higher incidence of dyslipidemia in PCAD that is similar to what Penida et al. found [33].

The rate of smoking among PCAD was lower in this study compared to Roxana Sadeghi et al. (30 % vs. 46 %) [24]. Smoking was rare among females in this study likely because yet it is not popular among women in the Kurdish society. Positive family history of CAD among the premature group of this study is similar to Mahnoosh Foroughi et al. study from Iran [31]. Nevertheless, higher percentages of positive family history were found in Turkey by Yildrim et al. [34]. Though recognized as an important risk factor for ACS in PCAD, HIV significantly impacts the trend of mortality increase in such patients. Interestingly, however, our study did not show any registered cases of which HIV caused PCAD [35].

Similar to Ibrahim Shah et al. and Badran et al. studies we found a significant higher rate of mild coronary lesions among premature group though it is in contrast to S. Sadiq Shah et al., who reported no statistical difference in the severity of coronary lesions between premature and mature CAD [32, 36, 37]. This finding, in the current study, possibly related to short duration of clustering of risk factors among premature group.

Evaluating the types of coronary lesion, Tahir et al. reported no statistical difference between premature and mature CAD. This study showed a significant higher rate of type A lesions among PCAD [25]. In consistence with Badran et al., Almayali and Christus et al., the study found higher rate of single vessel disease among PCAD [32, 38, 39]. Conversely, it showed a significant higher rate of 3VD/ 4VD among mature group. Similar results were reported by many studies, including Tewari et al. [25, 32, 39, 40]. In contrast with Farhan et al., this study showed a significantly higher rate of 3VD and 4VD among males with PCAD [41].

In accordance with the Abu Siddique et al. and Nafakhi, the distribution of major epicardial coronary artery involvement in this study was independent of the age [26, 30]. The therapeutic options, including the CABG that were significantly more doable in the MCAD and medical treatments that were more common in PCAD provided that there was less complex angiographic profile among PCAD compared to MCAD, were similar to Chrustus et al. [39].

Study limitations

There are a few main limitations to this study. To start with, only patients presented with symptoms and assigned for an angiogram were diagnosed with CAD that might limit the generalizability of the results. Though the study was a single center experience that could result in a referral bias, it reflected the trends of prematurity of CAD all over the country given a close attitude, genetics and socio economic similarities among the population. No data on follow up as well as the coronary imaging (e.g. IVUS) findings of patients included were collected. Nevertheless, this study, which is the first detailed one conducted on PCAD in the country, identified an unmet scientific need in the area, enrolled a relatively large sample size to investigate the prevalence of PCAD, and clearly defined data on all patients.

Conclusions

This study concludes that the rate of premature CAD in the country is alarming and that is mostly related to the clustering of cardiovascular risk factors. To reduce rates and consequences of PCAD, it is paramount to control the cardiovascular risk factors, screen the susceptible populations at risk and improve the coronary interventional services.

Abbreviations

ACS: 

acute coronary disease

CABG: 

coronary artery bypass grafting

CAD: 

coronary artery disease

CAG: 

coronary angiography

EF: 

ejection fraction

FH: 

family history

LAD: 

left anterior descending artery

LCX: 

left circumflex artery

MCAD: 

mature coronary artery disease

NPV: 

negative predictive value

PCAD: 

premature coronary artery disease

PCI: 

percutaneous coronary intervention

PPV: 

positive predictive value

QCA: 

quantitative coronary angiography

RCA: 

right coronary artery

VD: 

vessel disease

Declarations

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Duhok
(2)
Duhok Heart Center

References

  1. Shemirani H, Separham KH. The relative impact of smoking or Hypertension on severity of premature coronary artery disease. IRCMJ. 2007;9(4):177–81.Google Scholar
  2. Doughty M, Mehta R, Bruckman D, Das S, Karavite D, Tsai T, et al. Acute ischemic Heart disease: acute myocardial infarction in the young-the university of Michigan experience. Am Heart J. 2002;143(1):56–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Jamil G, Jamil M, AlKhazraji H, Haque A, Chedid F, Balasubramanian M, et al. Risk factor assessment of young patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2013;3(3):170–4.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Guipeng A, Zhongqi D, Xiao M, Tao G, Guishuang L, Yuguo C, et al. Risk Factors for Long-term Outcome of Drug-eluting Stenting in Adults with Early-onset Coronary Artery Disease. Int J Med Sci. 2014;11(7):721–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, DiMario C, Falk V, Folliguet T, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(20):2501–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Bojan C, et al. ACCF/AHA/SCAI Practice Guideline:2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention:A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Circulation. 2011;124:e574–651.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(4):e78–e140.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. JL Anderson, CD Adams, EM Antman, CR Bridges, RM Califf, DE Casey Jr, et al. Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non–ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50(7):e1–e157.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J, et al. ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(24):e44–e164.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2010. Diabetes Care. 2010;33 Suppl 1:S11–61. doi:10.2337/dc10-S011.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL, et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood PressureThe JNC 7 Report. JAMA. 2003;289(19):2560–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Pasternak RC. Report of the Adult Treatment Panel III: the 2001 National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines on the detection, evaluation and treatment of elevated cholesterol in adults. Cardiol Clin. 2003;21:393–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Parmar MS. Family history of coronary artery disease — need to focus on proper definition. Euro Heart J. 2003;24(22):2073.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Ryan H, Trosclair A, Gfroerer J. Adult Current Smoking: Differences in Definitions and Prevalence Estimates—NHIS and NSDUH, 2008. J Environ Public Health. 2012;2012:1–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Scanlon P, Faxon D, Audet A, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography123: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography) developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33(6):1756–824.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Mohammad AM, Sheikho SK, Tayib JM. Relation of Cardiovascular Risk Factors with Coronary Angiographic Findings in Iraqi Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease. Am J Cardiovasc Dis Res. 2013;1(1):25–9.Google Scholar
  17. Prashanth P, Kadhim S, Ibrahim A-Z, Said A. Acute Coronary Syndrome in Young Adults from Oman: Results from the Gulf Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Heart Views. 2010;11(3):93–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Al-Nozha MM, Arafah MR, Al-Mazrou YY, Al-Maatouq MA, Khan NB, Khalil MZ, et al. Coronary artery disease in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2004;25(9):1165–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Cole JH, Sperling LS. Premature coronary artery disease: Clinical risk factors and prognosis. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2004;6(2):121–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sharma M, Ganguly NK. Premature Coronary Artery Disease in Indians and its Associated Risk Factors. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2005;1(3):217–25.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Sang Z, Jin H, Tao C, Shen J, Xu Y, Liu Z. Temporal Trends in Young Chinese Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction. Exp Clin Cardiol. 2014;20(7):1105–28.Google Scholar
  22. Satoh H, Nishino T, Tomita K, Saijo Y, Kishi R, Tsutsui H. Risk factors and the incidence of coronary artery disease in young middle-aged Japanese men: results from a 10-year cohort study. Intern Med. 2006;45(5):235–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Muda Z, Kadir AA, Yusof Z, Yaacob LH. Premature Coronary Artery Disease among Angiographically Proven Atherosclerotic Coronary Artery Disease in North East of Peninsular Malaysia. Int J Collaborative Res Intern Med Public Health. 2013;5(7):507–16.Google Scholar
  24. Sadeghi R, Adnani N, Erfanifar A, Gachkar L, Maghsoomi Z. Premature Coronary Heart Disease and Traditional Risk Factors-Can We Do Better? Int Cardiovasc Res J. 2013;7(2):46–50.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Saghir T, Qamar N, Sial J. Coronary angiographic characteristics of coronary artery disease in young adults under age of forty years compared to those over age forty. Pakistan Heart J. 2008;41(3):49–56.Google Scholar
  26. Siddique A, Shrestha MP, Mohammad S, Sirajul Haque KMHS, Ahmed K, Sultan AU. Age-Related Differences of Risk Profile and Angiographic Findings in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease. BSMMU J. 2010;3(1):13–7.Google Scholar
  27. D’Onofrio G, Safdar B, Lichtman JH, Strait KM, Dreyer RP, Geda M, et al. Sex differences in reperfusion in young patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results from the VIRGO study. Circulation. 2015;14(131):1324–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Wegner NK. Disparities in STEMI management for the young goose and young gander: clinical, organizational, and educational challenges. Circulation. 2015;131:1310–2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Fakhir Nafakhi HA. Coronary angiographic findings in young patients with coronary artery disease. Intern J Collaborative Res Intern Med Public Health. 2013;5(1):48–53.Google Scholar
  30. Noeman A, Ahmad N, Azhar M. Coronary artery disease in young: faulty life style or heredofamilial or both. Annals. 2007;13(2):162–4.Google Scholar
  31. Foroughi M, Ahranjani SA, Ebrahimian M, Saieedi M, Safi M, Abtahian Z. Coronary artery disease in Iranian young adults, similarities and differences. Open J Epidemiol. 2014;4(1):19–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Badran HM, Elnoamany MF, Khalil TS, Eldin MME. Age-Related Alteration of Risk Profi le, Inflamatory Response, and Angiographic Findings in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome. Clin Med: Cardiol. 2009;3:15–28.Google Scholar
  33. Pineda J, Marín F, Roldán V, Valencia J, Marco P, Sogorb F. Premature myocardial infarction: clinical profile and angiographic findings. Int J Cardiol. 2008;126(1):127–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Nesligul Y, Nurcan A, Sait DM, Yeliz S, Firat O. Comparison of traditional risk factors, natural history andangiographic findings between coronary heart disease patients with age <40 and ≥40 years old. Anatolian J Cardiol. 2007;7:124–7.Google Scholar
  35. Fabrizio D’A, Enrico C, Darryn A, Claudio M, Andrea C, Nayef A, et al. Prognostic Indicators for Recurrent Thrombotic Events in HIV-infected Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes: Use of Registry Data From 12 sites in Europe, South Africa and the United States. Thromb Res. 2014;134(3):558–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Shah I, Faheem M, Shahzeb R, Hafizullah M. Clinical Profile, Angiographic Characteristics and Treatment Recommendations in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease. J Pak Med Stud. 2013;3(2):94–100.Google Scholar
  37. Sadiq Shah S, Lubna N, Syed Habib S, Shahsawar, Shahab Ud D, Zahid Aslam A, et al. Myocardial Infarction in young versus older adults: Clinical characteristics and angiographic features. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2010;22(2):187–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ahmed Hussein A-M. Coronary Artery Disease in Young versus Older Adults in Hilla City: Prevalence, Clinical Characteristics and Angiographic Profile. Karbala J Med. 2012;5(1):1328–33.Google Scholar
  39. Christus T, Shukkur AM, Rashdan I, Koshy T, Alanbaei M, Zubaid M, et al. Coronary Artery Disease in Patients Aged 35 or less. Heart Views J Gulf Heart Assoc. 2011;12(1):7–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Tewari S, Kumar S, Kapoor A, Singh U. Premature CAD in north india: an angiography study of 1971 patients. Indian Heart J. 2005;57(4):311–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Farhan HA. Coronary Artery Disease: Conventional Risk Factors & Angiographic Findings among Young Iraqi Adults. Univ Babylon J. 2010;2(18):644–50.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Mohammad et al. 2015

Advertisement