Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Endothelial dysfunction is associated with carotid plaque: a cross-sectional study from the population based Northern Manhattan Study

  • Tatjana Rundek1Email author,
  • Rameet Hundle1, 2,
  • Elizabeth Ratchford2,
  • Romel Ramas1,
  • Robert Sciacca2,
  • Marco R Di Tullio2,
  • Bernadette Boden-Albala1, 4,
  • Yumiko Miyake2,
  • Mitchell SV Elkind1, 3,
  • Ralph L Sacco1, 3, 5 and
  • Shunichi Homma2
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders20066:35

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-6-35

Received: 06 May 2006

Accepted: 17 August 2006

Published: 17 August 2006

Abstract

Background

Impaired vascular function occurs early in atherogenesis. Brachial flow mediated dilatation (FMD) is a non-invasive measure of vascular function and may be an important marker of preclinical atherosclerosis. Data on the association between FMD and carotid plaque in multi-ethnic populations are limited. The objective of this study was to determine whether endothelial dysfunction is independently associated with carotid plaque in a community of northern Manhattan.

Methods

In the population-based Northern Manhattan Study (NOMAS), high-resolution B-mode ultrasound images of the brachial and carotid arteries were obtained in 643 stroke-free subjects (mean age 66 years; 55% women; 65% Caribbean-Hispanic, 17% African-American, 16% Caucasian). Brachial FMD was measured during reactive hyperemia. Maximum carotid plaque thickness (MCPT) was measured at the peak plaque prominence.

Results

The mean brachial FMD was 5.78 ± 3.83 %. Carotid plaque was present in 339 (53%) subjects. The mean MCPT was 1.68 ± 0.82 mm, and the 75th percentile was 2.0 mm. Reduced FMD was significantly associated with increased MCPT. After adjusting for demographics, vascular risk factors, and education, each percent of FMD decrease was associated with a significant 0.02 mm increase in MCPT (p = 0.028). In a dichotomous adjusted model, blunted FMD was associated with an increased risk of MCPT ≥ 2.0 mm (OR, 1.11 for every 1% decrease in FMD; 95% CI, 1.03–1.19).

Conclusion

Decreased brachial FMD is independently associated with carotid plaque. Non-invasive evaluation of endothelial dysfunction may be a useful marker of preclinical atherosclerosis and help to individualize cardiovascular risk assessment beyond traditional risk factors.

Background

Atherosclerosis is characterized by a low-grade systemic inflammatory response and endothelial dysfunction [1]. Endothelial dysfunction is comprised of increased expression of cellular adhesion molecules, loss of anticoagulant properties, and increased vascular tone due to loss of bioavailability of vasodilatory endothelial nitric oxide [2]. Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) of the brachial artery is a reliable and reproducible non-invasive tool used to evaluate endothelial function [3]. Impaired brachial FMD has been associated with traditional cardiovascular risk factors and has been observed to predict cardiovascular events in selected high-risk groups of patients [4, 6].

Carotid plaque and intima-media thickness (IMT) detected by non-invasive high-resolution ultrasound are markers of systemic subclinical atherosclerosis and strong predictors of future myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke [7, 9]. Several case-control studies have observed an association between decreased brachial FMD and increased IMT, thus linking endothelial dysfunction to atherogenesis [10]. However, these studies were limited by their small sample size and by issues in study design. Recently, no significant correlation between brachial FMD and carotid IMT was observed among middle-aged healthy men [11]. In the same population, FMD was not associated with traditional vascular risk factors; while the opposite was reported in individuals at low cardiovascular risk in a recent meta-analysis [12] as well as in other cohorts [13]. There is an ongoing debate whether FMD is associated with other imaging markers of systemic subclinical atherosclerosis and to which extent is modified by the effects of vascular risk factors. Carotid plaque may be a distinctive phenotype of atherosclerosis and not a continuum of increased wall thickness or IMT progression [10, 14]. In this study, we sought to examine the association between endothelial function and carotid plaque in an urban population-based multiethnic cohort, and to investigate possible interactions with age, race-ethnicity, and traditional vascular risk factors.

Methods

Study population

The study population was obtained from the Northern Manhattan Study (NOMAS), an ongoing community-based study designed to investigate vascular risk factors and the incidence of vascular events, to identify novel risk factors, and to provide data on the association of various vascular risk factors and subclinical atherosclerosis in different race-ethnic groups in northern Manhattan [15, 16]. NOMAS is comprised of 3,298 adult subjects without prior MI or stroke. After several months of piloting brachial FMD in our cohort and working out the technical methods, we began collecting data on FMD in 1998. Participants who were undergoing cardiac echo were selected to undergo brachial FMD testing. Between January 1998 and April 2001, we obtained high quality FMD images among 842 subjects of whom 643 had both carotid ultrasonography and brachial FMD measurements performed. These subjects were not significantly different from the parent cohort with respect to demographic and risk factors. The cardiovascular risk factors were collected using the CDC Risk Factor Surveillance Instrument. Hypertension was defined as a systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg or a diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg, or the patient's self-report of a history of hypertension or antihypertensive medication use. Diabetes mellitus was defined as either a fasting blood glucose level ≥ 126 mg/dL or the subject's self-report of diabetes, insulin use, or oral hypoglycemic use. Hypercholesterolemia was defined as a history of elevated cholesterol, taking medications for elevated cholesterol or a total cholesterol level > 240. Current tobacco use was defined as smoking within the past year. Alcohol use was defined as more than one drink per month. Physical activity was categorized as any, if any participation in usual leisure physical activities was reported, or none. The study was approved by the Columbia University Medical Center Institutional Review Board, and all patients gave written informed consent.

Assessment of endothelial function

Endothelial function was assessed by measuring brachial artery FMD in response to reactive hyperemia using high-resolution B-mode ultrasound [3]. Participants fasted for 12 hours prior to the brachial FMD examination. They were asked not to ingest substances that might affect flow mediated dilatation (FMD) such as caffeine, or use tobacco at least 6 hours prior to the appointment, and to avoid vasoactive medications for 24 hours prior to the study. The brachial artery diameter was measured 6 cm proximal to the antecubital crease using a 7–15 MHz linear array transducer (Philips 5500, Andover, MA). Flow-mediated dilatation was measured as the response to reactive hyperemia induced by a 5-minute blood pressure cuff occlusion of the upper arm. Inflation pressure was 200 mmHg if the subject's pre-examination systolic blood pressure was less than 150 mmHg, or 50 mmHg above the systolic blood pressure if it was greater than 150 mmHg but less than 180 mmHg. End-diastolic images were acquired at baseline and 1 minute after cuff deflation. Data was analyzed using CVI analysis and acquisition software (Data Translation, MA). Flow-mediated dilatation was expressed as FMD = [(brachial artery diameter at peak hyperemia - diameter at rest)/diameter at rest × 100]. Intra-observer and inter-observer variability for FMD measurements were 1.3% and 2.7%, respectively (n = 15).

Assessment of carotid plaque

Carotid artery plaque was assessed according to a standard scanning and reading protocols [17] using high-resolution B-mode ultrasound GE LOGIQ 700 system with a multifrequency 9–13 MHz linear-array transducer. The internal carotid and common carotid arteries as well as the bifurcations were examined for the presence of atherosclerotic plaque, defined as an area of focal wall thickening or protrusion into the lumen at least 50% greater than surrounding total wall thickness. Maximum carotid plaque thickness (MCPT) was measured at the peak plaque prominence from any of the three carotid artery segments using a semi-automatic IMAGE-Pro V.5.2 software (Microsoft). If plaque was not identified, plaque thickness was recorded as zero. The intraclass correlation coefficients for within and between reader variability of MCPT measurements were 0.94 and 0.77, respectively (n = 88) [18].

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SAS 8.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). All continuous data are presented as a mean value ± SD, and all categorical data are reported as a percentage or absolute number. Student's t tests and Chi-square tests were used to assess differences between groups. The association between FMD and MCPT was analyzed by multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses. The dependent variable, MCPT, was analyzed as a continuous variable, and dichotomized using the 75th percentile cut off level of the plaque thickness distribution. These analyses were adjusted for demographics, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, education, physical activity, alcohol, and current smoking. The results are reported as slopes (β) for the linear regression models and as odds ratios (OR) for the logistic regression. To test for differences in the effect of FMD on MCPT among age and race-ethnic groups, interaction terms were added to the multivariate models.

Results

Study population

The study population included 643 subjects with a mean age of 66.1 ± 8.5 years (range, 54–94 years), 55% female, 65% Hispanic, 17% African American, and 16% Caucasian (Table 1). The prevalence of risk factors was as follows: 67% hypertension, 24% diabetes, 50% hypercholesterolemia, 43% subjects reported consuming more than one glass of alcohol per month, 13% were current smokers, 49% were physically inactive, and 41% completed high school. The mean brachial artery diameter at baseline was 3.9 ± 0.7 mm, and the mean absolute change was 0.22 ± 0.14 mm, with a mean percent change in diameter (FMD) of 5.78 ± 3.83. Significant correlation was found between FMD and baseline brachial artery diameter (r = -.414, p<0.001) was found. Carotid plaque was present in 339 subjects (53%). The mean MCPT was 1.68 ± 0.82 mm (range 0 – 8.0 mm). The 75th percentile of the MCPT distribution was 2.0 mm.
Table 1

Characteristics of study subjects from the Northern Manhattan Study

 

N

Prevalence (%) or Mean ± SD

Total

643

--

Age

643

66.1 ± 8.5 years

Men

290

45 %

Hispanic

417

65 %

African American

109

17 %

Caucasian

102

16 %

Hypertension

431

67 %

Diabetes mellitus

154

24 %

Hypercholesterolemia

322

50 %

Alcohol consumption

276

43 %

Current smoking

84

13 %

Physical inactivity

315

49 %

Completed high school

264

41 %

Carotid plaque

339

53%

MCPT (mm)

643

1.68 ± 0.82

   75th percentile

 

2.00

Baseline diameter of the brachial artery (mm)

643

3.90 ± 0.71

FMD (%)

643

5.78 ± 3.83

FMD = flow mediated dilatation, MCPT= maximum carotid plaque thickness

Relationship between brachial FMD and carotid plaque (MCPT)

Mean FMD was lower among subjects with carotid plaque (5.42 ± 3.86) than among subjects without plaque (6.18 ± 3.75), p = 0.01 (Figure 1). Subjects in the lowest quartile of FMD (<2.81) were more likely to have MCPT ≥ 2.0 mm, with 22% of them compared to 9% in subjects in the highest quartile of FMD (≥ 8.38), p<0.01 (data not shown).
Figure 1

The mean ( ± SD) values of brachial FMD among 304 (47%) subjects without carotid plaque and among 339 (53%) subjects with carotid plaque.

Reduced FMD was significantly associated with increased MCPT in a univariate regression model (β = -0.038, p<0.001). After adjusting for demographics and risk factors, and baseline diameter of the brachial artery the magnitude of the effect was reduced but FMD remained significantly associated with increased MCPT (Table 2, β = -0.021, p = 0.027). No significant interactions between FMD and hypertension, diabetes, or smoking were found.
Table 2

Association between brachial FMD and maximum carotid artery thickness (MCPT)

 

β

p

FMD

-0.021

0.027

Age (per year)

0.041

<0.001

Current Smoking

0.378

0.001

Male

0.073

0.366

Systolic Blood Pressure (per mm Hg)

0.001

0.566

Diabetes

0.098

0.292

High Cholesterol

0.140

0.060

Completed high school

0.069

0.363

Physical Activity

0.038

0.650

Alcohol Consumption

-0.019

0.899

Baseline diameter of the brachial artery (mm)

0.193

0.072

In a dichotomous model, lower FMD was significantly associated with MCPT ≥ 2.0 mm (OR, 1.10 for every 1% decrease in FMD; 95% CI, 1.04–1.18) in a univariate and in a multivariate model (Table 3).
Table 3

Association between brachial FMD and MCPT ≥ 2.0 mm

 

Odds Ratio

95% Confidence Interval

FMD (per 1% decrease)

1.10

1.04 – 1.18

Age (per year)

1.11

1.08 – 1.11

Current Smoking

2.30

1.28 – 4.44

Male

1.11

0.69 – 1.92

Systolic Blood Pressure (per mmHg)

0.99

0.97 – 1.01

Diabetes

1.39

0.85 – 2.66

High Cholesterol

1.44

0.87 – 2.41

Completed high school

1.04

0.62 – 1.69

Physical Activity

0.88

0.57 – 1.41

Alcohol Consumption

1.05

0.67 – 1.77

Baseline diameter of the brachial artery (mm)

0.87

0.71 – 1.84

Interactions with age, sex, and race-ethnicity

No significant differences were detected in the effect of FMD on MCPT among various race-ethnic groups in either the univariate (p = 0.37) or multivariable (p = 0.27) logistic regression models although the OR for Caucasians (1.23; 95% CI, 0.97–1.49) showed a somewhat larger effect than for African Americans (1.04; 95% CI, 0.89–1.20) or Caribbean Hispanics (1.06; 95% CI, 0.97–1.16). The differences were found for the FMD effect among those aged 65 or older (adjusted OR = 1.16; 95% CI, 1.03–1.49), than in those younger than 65 years (adjusted OR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.90–1.14), although not statistically significant (p = 0.06). No significant difference in the association of FMD with MCPT was found between men and women.

Discussion

We found a significant association between endothelial dysfunction and presence of carotid plaque in a population-based cohort. Impairment of brachial FMD was more pronounced among those with carotid plaques thicker than 2 mm. This thickness was associated with a high cardiovascular risk [7, 9]. The inverse relationship between FMD and carotid plaque was independent of demographics and traditional vascular risk factors, raising the possibility that endothelial dysfunction may directly promote atherogenesis. Our observation emphasizes the importance of evaluating endothelial function in the assessment of vascular risk beyond traditional risk factors. Furthermore, carotid artery plaque assessment in the combination with FMD may be a useful monitoring tool for high risk individuals.

Other investigators have assessed the relationship between FMD and subclinical atherosclerosis. AA mong 2,109 young healthy adults from the Young Finns study (ages 24 to 39), brachial FMD was inversely and significantly associated with carotid IMT [19]. In contrast, no significant correlation between brachial FMD and carotid IMT was observed among 1,578 middle-aged healthy men from the Firefighters and their Endothelium (FATE) study [11]. Although the FATE study population consisted of only men who were slightly older than the Young Finns population (mean age of 49 ± 10 years), the discrepancy in the results from these two population is striking. A different IMT measurement technique is the most evident dissimilarity. In the Young Finns study, IMT was measured only from the far wall of the distal part of the common carotid artery; while a more complex carotid IMT score including the internal and common carotid arteries and bifurcation was used in the FATE study. The results from the FATE study are somehow contraintuitive as a more complex and presumably more detailed analysis of IMT was less likely to show a significant relationship with FMD. Furthermore, even if one assumes differences in IMT measurement techniques to be responsible for these discrepant results, it cannot explain almost total lack of association between FMD and conventional cardiovascular risk factors in the FATE study. Other characteristics of the study populations may also have accounted for the conflicting results. None of the studies reported on the presence of carotid plaque.

In our study, carotid plaque thickness, not carotid IMT, was used as a measure of subclinical atherosclerosis, and was significantly associated with reduced FMD. Carotid plaque may be a distinctive phenotype of atherosclerosis and not just a continuum of increased wall thickness or IMT progression. Carotid IMT, especially in early development, represents mainly hypertensive hypertrophy of the media and is under substantial genetic control [13]. A considerable heritability of carotid IMT of 40% was recently reported [20]; while the heritability of carotid plaque was insignificant. Indeed, carotid plaque is strongly influenced by the environmental factors including a control of lipids, monocytes, smooth muscle cells, and oxidative stress. Therefore, endothelial dysfunction may be more likely associated with plaque due to environmental exposures and less likely associated to IMT which is under significant genetic control. Several studies have provided evidence that carotid plaque predicts prevalent CAD better than does IMT [14, 21]. FMD and carotid plaque may also be independent predictors of vascular outcome [22]. Reduced availability of endothelium-derived nitric oxide, as reflected by reduced FMD, may modulate the impact of atherosclerotic plaque by enhancing its progression and rapidly increasing the risk for vascular events [23]. Thus, the functional and structural assessments of the arterial wall may be fundamental determinants in the prognosis of vascular disease. Nonetheless, relatively small and limited case-control studies and case series have examined the association between FMD and carotid plaque [10].

The strength of association between FMD and carotid plaque in our study was similar among men and women, and various race-ethnic groups. Although preliminary data suggest that FMD differs by sex and race-ethnicity and that these differences may parallel differential cardiovascular risk [24], it remains to be determined whether sex and racial differences in endothelial function explain the difference in CVD morbidity and mortality. In our cohort, the association between FMD and carotid plaque was more pronounced among subjects older than 65 years. It has already been recognized that many structural and vascular changes occur with aging even among subjects without overt CVD [25].

Numerous studies have reported on the associations between FMD and vascular risk factors. We have previously observed the associations of FMD with diabetes and hypertension [13]. However, we did not find any interactions between FMD and traditional risk factors on the risk of carotid plaque. In contrast, in the recent meta-analysis, FMD was related to the risk factors only in the low risk populations [12]. This discrepancy can be explained by the different demographics of the studied populations. In addition the biology of endothelium where its dysfunction is an initial step in atherogenesis after which an addition of risk factors may not cause a further decline of endothelial function. In meta-analysis however, other confounders including variations between and within the reported studies may have influenced the results. Smoking may be an important confounder modifying endothelial dysfunction [26]. We did not observe a significant interaction between smoking and FMD. Our observation contributes to the hypothesis that endothelial dysfunction may directly lead to atherogenesis, although some residual confounding cannot be entirely excluded. The mechanism by which endothelial dysfunction may promote plaque formation independently of other risk factors is not clear. Imbalance in the production and degradation of nitric oxide within the arterial wall may play a major role by directly influencing atherogenesis through leukocyte adhesion, lipid deposition, vascular smooth muscle cell growth, and thrombosis [2].

Strengths of our study include the population-based design, the diverse ethnic population, and ongoing follow-up, which will allow for the prospective evaluation of FMD as a clinically useful measure of vascular risk. Our study also has several limitations. For any such study, temperature, foods, medications, and sympathetic stimuli may all affect FMD. Attempts were made to control these factors to the greatest extent possible during subject preparation, yet these factors depend on patient cooperation, and any aberration may have influenced FMD results. Measurements of carotid IMT were not available in this group of subjects therefore the associations between FMD and IMT were not assessed. However, carotid plaque is an accepted surrogate marker of atherosclerosis and may be even a stronger predictor of vascular events than IMT [14]. The reported associations are cross-sectional, not allowing for determination of whether FMD changes precede plaque formation.

Conclusion

Endothelial dysfunction in this multi-ethnic population of older men and women is associated with carotid plaque. Carotid plaque is a recognized measure of subclinical atherosclerosis and a marker of future cardiovascular events. Impaired FMD predicts vascular events in selected high-risk groups of patients, and several large ongoing population-based studies, including MESA [27], CHS [7], the Framingham Heart Study [4], and NOMAS [16] will determine whether brachial FMD independently identifies individuals at risk for developing cardiovascular disease in the general population.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Gilbert Baum Memorial Grant and the Goddess Fund for Stroke Research in Women (TR), and by grants from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, R01 29993 (RLS), K23 NS42912 (MSVE), AHA (Kathleen Scott Research Fellowship, MSVE) and the General Clinical Research Center (2 M01 RR00645).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Neurology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University
(2)
Department of Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University
(3)
Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University
(4)
Division of Sociomedical Sciences, Joseph P. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University
(5)
Department of Epidemiology, Joseph P. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University

References

  1. Ross R: Atherosclerosis – an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1999, 340: 115-126. 10.1056/NEJM199901143400207.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cines DB, Pollak ES, Buck CA, Loscalzo J, Zimmerman GA, McEver RP, Pober JS, Wick TM, Konkle BA, Schwartz BS, Barnathan ES, McCrae KR, Hug BA, Schmidt AM, Stern DM: Endothelial cells in physiology and in the pathophysiology of vascular disorders. Blood. 1998, 91: 3527-3561.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Corretti MC, Anderson TJ, Benjamin EJ, Celermajer D, Charbonneau F, Creager MA, Deanfield J, Drexler H, Gerhard-Herman M, Herrington D, Vallance P, Vita J, Vogel R: International Brachial Artery Reactivity Task Force. Guidelines for the ultrasound assessment of endothelial-dependent flow-mediated vasodilatation of the brachial artery: a report of the International Brachial Artery Reactivity Task Force. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002, 16;39 (2): 257-65. 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01746-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Benjamin EJ, Larson MG, Keyes MJ, Mitchell GF, Vasan RS, Keaney JF, Lehman BT, Fan S, Osypiuk E, Vita JA: Clinical correlates and heritability of flow-mediated dilation in the community: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2004, 109 (5): 613-9. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000112565.60887.1E.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Wu HD, Berglund L, Dimayuga C, Jones J, Sciacca RR, Di Tullio MR, Homma S: High lipoprotein(a) levels and small apolipoprotein(a) sizes are associated with endothelial dysfunction in a multiethnic cohort. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004, 43 (10): 1828-33. 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.08.066.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Suwaidi JA, Hamasaki S, Higano ST, Nishimura RA, Holmes DR, Lerman A: Long-term follow-up of patients with mild coronary artery disease and endothelial dysfunction. Circulation. 2000, 101: 948-954.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. O'Leary DH, Polak JF, Kronmal RA, Manolio TA, Burke GL, Wolfson SK: Carotid-artery intima and media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults. Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. N Engl J Med. 1999, 340 (1): 14-22. 10.1056/NEJM199901073400103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Burke GL, Evans GW, Riley WA, Sharrett AR, Howard G, Barnes RW, Rosamond W, Crow RS, Rautaharju PM, Heiss G: Arterial wall thickness is associated with prevalent cardiovascular disease in middle-aged adults. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Stroke. 1995, 26 (3): 386-91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bots ML, Hoes AW, Koudstaal PJ, Hofman A, Grobbee DE: Common carotid intima-media thickness and risk of stroke and myocardial infarction: the Rotterdam Study. Circulation. 1997, 96 (5): 1432-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chan SY, Mancini GB, Kuramoto L, Schulzer M, Frohlich J, Ignaszewski A: The prognostic importance of endothelial dysfunction and carotid atheroma burden in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003, 42 (6): 1037-43. 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00927-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Yan RT, Anderson TJ, Charbonneau F, Title L, Verma S, Lonn E: on behalf of the FATE Investigators. Relationship between carotid artery intima-media thickness and brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation in middle-aged healthy men. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005, 12: 1980-6. 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.12.079.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Witte DR, Westernik J, de Koning EJ, van der Graaf Y, Grobbee DE, Bots ML: Is the association between flow-mediated dilatation and cardiovascular risk limited to low-risk populations?. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005, 12: 1987-93. 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.02.073.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Elkind MS, Sciacca RR, Boden-Albala B, Tondella ML, Feikin DR, Fields BS, Sacco RL, Di Tullio MR, Homma S: Leukocyte count is associated with reduced endothelial reactivity. Atherosclerosis. 2005, 181 (2): 329-38. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2005.01.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Spence JD, Eliasziw M, DiCicco M, Hackam DG, Galil R, Lohmann T: Carotid plaque Area. A tool for targeting and evaluating vascular preventive therapy. Stroke. 2002, 33: 2916-22. 10.1161/01.STR.0000042207.16156.B9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Sacco RL, Roberts JK, Boden-Albala B, Gu Q, Lin IF, Kargman DE, Berglund L, Hauser WA, Shea S, Paik MC: Race-ethnicity and determinants of carotid atherosclerosis in a multiethnic population. The Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Stroke. 1997, 28 (5): 929-35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. White H, Boden-Albala B, Wang C, Elkind MS, Rundek T, Wright CB, Sacco RL: Ischemic stroke subtype incidence among whites, blacks, and Hispanics: the Northern Manhattan Study. Circulation. 2005, 111 (10): 1327-31. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000157736.19739.D0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Desvarieux M, Demmer RT, Rundek T, Boden-Albala B, Jacobs DR, Sacco RL, Papapanou PN: Relationship between periodontal disease, tooth loss, and carotid artery plaque: The oral infections and vascular disease epidemiology study (INVEST). Stroke. 2003, 34: 2120-2125. 10.1161/01.STR.0000085086.50957.22.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Rundek T, Elkind MS, Pittman J, Boden-Albala B, Martin S, Humphries SE, Hank Juo S-H, Sacco RL: Carotid Intima-Media Thickness is Associated with Allelic Variants of Stromelysin-1, Interleukin-6 and Hepatic Lipase Genes: The Northern Manhattan Prospective Cohort Study. Stroke. 2002, 333 (5): 1420-1423. 10.1161/01.STR.0000015558.63492.B6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Juonala M, Viikari JS, Laitinen T, Marniemi J, Helenius H, Ronnemaa T, Raitakari OT: Interrelations between brachial endothelial function and carotid intima-media thickness in young adults: the cardiovascular risk in young Finns study. Circulation. 2004, 110 (18): 2918-23. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000147540.88559.00.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Juo SH, Lin HF, Rundek T, Sabala EA, Boden-Albala B, Park N, Lan MY, Sacco RL: Genetic and environmental contributions to carotid intima-media thickness and obesity phenotypes in the Northern Manhattan Family Study. Stroke. 2004, 35 (10): 2243-7. 10.1161/01.STR.0000142132.20442.d8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Ebrahim SB, Papacosta O, Whincup P, Wannamethee G, Walker M, Nicolaides AN, Dhanjil S, Griffin M, Belcaro G, Rumley A, Lowe GD: Carotid plaque, intima media thickness, cardiovascular risk factors, and prevalent cardiovascular disease in men and women: the British Regional Heart Study. Stroke. 1999, 30: 841-850.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Teragawa H, Kato M, Kurokawa J, Yamagata T, Matsuura H, Chayama K: Usefulness of flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery and/or the intima-media thickness of the carotid artery in predicting coronary narrowing in patients suspected of having coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2001, 88 (10): 1147-51. 10.1016/S0002-9149(01)02051-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Rohani M, Jogestrand T, Kallner G, Jussila R, Agewall S: Morphological changes rather than flow-mediated dilatation in the brachial artery are better indicators of the extent and severity of coronary artery disease. Hypertens. 2005, 1397-402. 7Google Scholar
  24. Loehr LR, Espeland MA, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Burke GL, Crouse JR, Herrington DM: Racial differences in endothelial function in postmenopausal women. Am Heart J. 2004, 148 (4): 606-11. 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.04.032.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Wilson AM, O'Neal D, Nelson CL, Prior DL, Best JD, Jenkins AJ: Comparison of arterial assessments in low and high vascular disease risk groups. Am J Hypertens. 2004, 17 (4): 285-91. 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2003.10.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Esen AM, Barutcu I, Acar M, Degirmenci B, Kaya D, Turkmen M, Melek M, Onrat E, Esen OB, Kirma C: Effect of smoking on endothelial function and wall thickness of brachial artery. Circ J. 2004, 68 (12): 1123-6. 10.1253/circj.68.1123.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Bild DE, Bluemke DA, Burke GL, Detrano R, Diez Roux AV, Folsom AR, Greenland P, Jacob DR, Kronmal R, Liu K, Nelson JC, O'Leary D, Saad MF, Shea S, Szklo M, Tracy RP: Multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis: Objectives and design. Am J Epidemiol. 2002, 156 (9): 871-81. 10.1093/aje/kwf113.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2261/6/35/prepub

Copyright

© Rundek et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement