Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Lower serum triglyceride level is a risk factor for in-hospital and late major adverse events in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention- a cohort study

  • Yu-Tsung Cheng1,
  • Tsun-Jui Liu1, 2,
  • Hui-Chin Lai1, 2,
  • Wen-Lieng Lee1, 2,
  • Hung-Yun Ho1,
  • Chieh-Shou Su1, 2,
  • Chia-Ning Liu3 and
  • Kuo-Yang Wang1, 2, 4Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders201414:143

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-14-143

Received: 18 August 2014

Accepted: 6 October 2014

Published: 10 October 2014

Abstract

Background

Whether serum triglyceride level correlates with clinical outcomes of patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) remains unclear.

Methods

From June 2008 to February 2012, all patients with STEMI who were treated with pPCI in this tertiary referral hospital and then had fasting lipid profiles measured within 24 hours were included and dichotomized into lower- (150 mg/dl) and higher-triglyceridemic (>150 mg/dl) groups. Baseline characteristics, in-hospital outcomes, and late major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were compared in-between. Independent predictors for in-hospital death and late adverse events were identified by multivariate logistic and Cox regression analyses.

Results

A total of 247 patients were enrolled, including 163 lower-triglyceridemic and 84 higher-triglyceridemic subjects. The angiographic characteristics, pPCI results and in-hospital outcomes were similar between the two groups. However, multivariate logistic analysis identified triglyceride level as a negative predictor for in-hospital death (OR 0.963, 95% CI 0.931-0.995, p = 0.023). At follow-up for a mean period of 1.23 to 1.40 years, compared with the high-triglyceridemic group, low-triglyceridemic patients had fewer cumulative incidences of target vessel revascularization (TVR) (21.7% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.011) and overall MACE (26.1% vs. 11.9%, p = 0.0137). Cox regression analysis confirmed serum triglyceride as a negative predictor for TVR and overall MACE.

Conclusions

Serum triglyceride level inversely correlates with in-hospital death and late outcomes in patients with STEMI treated with pPCI. Thus, when managing such patients, a high serum triglyceride level can be regarded as a benign factor but not a target for aggressive therapy.

Keywords

TriglycerideMyocardial infarctionCoronaryRevascularizationRestenosisOutcome

Background

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of disability and death in the Western world [1]. When coronary arteries are involved, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) manifests an extreme presentation that carries ominous short- and long-term prognosis in terms of fatal arrhythmia, acute pumping failure, myocardial rupture and chronic left ventricular dysfunction [2]. Timely primary percutaneous coronary revascularization (pPCI) is well established as the most effective therapy for restoring vessel patency, salvaging jeopardized myocardium and preserving cardiac performance [2, 3]. However, a substantial proportion of patients are still at risk of early electrical/mechanical complications and late major adverse cardiac events (MACE) from myocardial stunning, unfavorable left ventricular remodeling, culprit lesion restenosis and de novo coronary stenosis [4], raising identification of high-risk patient subsets as an essential issue in the goal to improve the overall outcome of such a disease.

The chief prognostic determiners for patients with STEMI are the sizes of the infarcted and residual viable myocardium. When the culprit vessel is successfully opened by pPCI and the ischemic territory is thereby limited, a number of other factors may play a predictive role in determining the prognosis of these patients. Among such factors low-density lipoprotein (LDL) is closely related with early and late cardiovascular events [5] in patients with acute coronary syndrome; hence the use of aggressive statin therapy for these patients is justified to benefit cardiovascular outcome [6]. In contrast, whether serum triglyceride (TG) correlates with the outcome of STEMI and how it should be managed remains unclear. Some investigations showed that hypertriglyceridemia independently predicted development of coronary artery disease (CAD) [7, 8] and myocardial infarction [9] as hypercholesterolemia did [10], whereas others reported low TG levels were associated with poorer prognosis in some cardiac and non-cardiac disease states [1113]. Given the controversial yet potentially crucial impact of hypertriglyceridemia on the outcome of patients with STEMI treated by pPCI, this study was designed to elucidate the differences in short- and long-term cardiovascular outcomes between patients with high- and low-serum TG levels. The results of this study could clarify the role of serum TG in determining the prognosis of patients suffering from STEMI, and may help guide proper management of such patients to improve their overall outcome.

Methods

Patients

From June 2008 to February 2012, of the 301 patients admitted to this tertiary referral center with a diagnosis of STEMI for primary PCI (pPCI), 247 had a lipid profile checked within 24 hours of admission so were enrolled and categorized into either the lower (150 mg/dl, N = 163, or 66%) or the higher (>150 mg/dl, N = 84, or 34%) triglyceride group according to the baseline level of serum triglycerides. Baseline characteristics, angiographic findings, and clinical outcomes were obtained from electronic or written medical records as well as the cardiac catheterization laboratory database and were compared between groups. The study protocol was approved by the human research committee of Taichung Veterans General Hospital (approval No. CE12289), and requirement of informed consent was waived by the institutional review board.

Coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention

The diagnosis of STEMI was made based on conventionally standardized criteria [2]. Coronary angiography was performed from either a radial or femoral approach at the discretion of the interventional cardiologists. Grade of blood flow was determined by TIMI classification system [14]. Angiographic stenosis was defined as a luminal diameter reduction of ≥50% by quantitative coronary angiography, and critical stenosis was defined as ≥70% narrowing of the coronary artery luminal diameter. Complete coronary occlusion was defined as absence of antegrade flow of contrast media beyond a specific vascular segment. The infarct-related lesion was determined by the relevant ECG leads showing ST-segment elevation (or ST-segment depression along with a tall R wave in lead V1 for posterior infarction) and by the typical vascular morphological features of thrombus-laden or hazy filling defects along with compromise of distal flow. Once angiographic occlusion or critical stenosis of any of the coronary arteries was demonstrated, PCI with or without stenting was performed for the infarct-related artery but not for any other bystander vessel unless hemodynamic instability persisted despite opening of the culprit lesion. The success of pPCI was defined as achievement of the TIMI flow of the infarct related artery to grade II or III. Patients were then taken to our intensive coronary care unit for post-procedural care. Pharmacological treatment, including dual-antiplatelet medication, was in accordance with current guidelines [2]. In-hospital complications, including cardiogenic shock requiring intra-aortic balloon pumping support, new-onset atrial fibrillation, ventricular arrhythmia, and death served as in-hospital outcomes.

Follow-up

Discharged patients were followed up by medical records of clinic visits or telephone contacts for MACE, including data regarding non-fatal myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization (TVR), need of coronary artery bypass grafting, cardiac death and all-cause mortality. Use of lipid-lowering agents (chiefly statins and fibrates) and non–lipid-lowering drugs (aspirin, clopidogrel, cilostazol, β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor antagonists, aldactone receptor blockers) was compared between groups.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Normally distributed continuous data were compared between groups by unpaired student’s T-test, while non-parametric continuous data were compared by Mann–Whitney U test. Categorical variables were compared by χ2 analysis with Fisher’s exact correction. Univariate followed by multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent correlates of in-hospital mortality in all patients. Rationale variables selected for regression analysis included the following: demographic characteristics, co-morbid illnesses, echocardiographic indicators, and angiographic features. Variables were tested in a backward conditioned multivariate logistic regression model if their univariate P values were <0.20. Statistical significance was defined as a multivariate P <0.05. The odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from the multivariate logistic regression analysis were used as estimates of relative risk. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for components of MACE and overall MACE rate were constructed and compared between groups with the Log-Rank test. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to determine the independent predictors of TVR and overall MACE after adjustment for baseline and angiographic variables with unequal distribution. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant for all analyses. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 11.5 or SAS 9.3.

Results

Patient characteristics

The demographic data of both groups of patients are listed in Table 1. Patients in the lower-TG group were older (67 vs. 56 years, p < 0.01) and had lower body mass index, worse estimated glomerular filtration rate, higher high-density lipoprotein (HDL) as well as lower total cholesterol levels than those in the higher-TG group.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of patients in the lower-TG (150 mg/dl) and higher-TG (>150 mg/dl) groups

 

Lower-TG group

Higher-TG group

P

N

163

84

 

Age, yrs

67.1 ± 13.2

56.1 ± 11.3

<0.001

Female (%)

22 (13.6)

19 (22.6)

0.100

Hypertension (%)

97 (59.5)

61 (72.6)

0.058

DM (%)

46 (28.2)

34 (40.5)

0.071

Smoking (%)

99 (60.7)

56 (66.7)

0.439

BMI, kg/m 2

24.1 ± 3.5

26.3 ± 3.2

<0.001

Previous CAD (%)

22 (13.5)

5 (6.0)

0.113

Previous stroke (%)

15 (9.2)

5 (6.0)

0.522

Carotid stenosis (%)

4 (2.5)

0 (0)

0.303

PAD (%)

3 (1.8)

2 (2.4)

1.000

eGFR, ml/min

46.7 ± 18.5

57.6 ± 20.5

<0.001

Previous hypolipid drugs

Statin

21 (12.9)

12 (14.3)

0.913

Fibrate

1 (0.6)

3 (3.6)

0.115

Admission lipid profile

   

HDL, mg/dl

45.4 ± 10.8

37.4 ± 8

<0.001

LDL, mg/dl

100.9 ± 31.6

106.6 ± 41.4

0.231

TC/HDL

3.65 ± 0.87

5.02 ± 1.36

<0.001

LDL/HDL

2.32 ± 0.81

2.93 ± 1.28

<0.001

TG, mg/dl (range)

83.6 ± 34.3 (13–149)

258.6 ± 136.8 (152–805)

<0.001

Cardiogenic shock (%)

29 (17.8)

7 (8.3)

0.071

BMI, body mass index; CAD, coronary artery disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density protein; PAD, peripheral arterial disease; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride.

ECG, coronary angiographic findings, pPCI results and in-hospital outcomes

The territory of myocardial infarction determined by ECG was mostly located in the anterior wall in both groups (Table 2). The severity of overall coronary artery disease, the culprit lesion vessel, the ECG-to-balloon time and the therapeutic modalities of pPCI in terms of balloon angioplasty, thrombectomy, and endovascular stenting were similar between the two groups (p = NS in all). Success of PCI (post-procedural TIMI-blood flow to grade 2) was accomplished in most of the patients in both groups (p = NS). Though post-procedural left ventricular ejection fraction estimated with either ventriculography or echocardiography was more depressed in the low-TG group (44.8% vs. 46.9%, p = 0.031), myocardial infarct size estimated by peak creatinine kinase (CK) levels was comparable between the two groups. Occurrence of new cardiogenic shock, respiratory failure, atrial fibrillation and ventricular arrhythmia, as well as requirement of emergency coronary bypass surgery was also statistically equivalent in the two groups (p = NS in all). Though in-hospital mortality happened in 6 patients in the lower TG (5 from ventricular arrhythmia and 1 from refractory pumping failure) but 0 in the higher TG group, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.098). Further univariate followed by multivariate regression analysis identified peak CK and CAD number >1 as positive, whereas serum TG level as negative predictors of in-hospital death for all of these patients (Table 3).
Table 2

ECG location of STEMI, findings of coronary angiograms and results of primary percutaneous coronary interventions in all patients

 

Lower-TG group

High-TG group

P

N

163

84

 

ECG infarct area

   

  Anterior (%)

87 (53.4)

51 ( 60.7 )

0.334

  Inferior (%)

72 ( 44.2 )

33 ( 39.3 )

0.548

  True posterior (%)

2 ( 1.2 )

2 ( 2.4 )

0.607

  High lateral (%)

8 ( 4.9 )

4 ( 4.8 )

1.000

Severity of CAD

   

Number of diseased vessels

1.8±0.8

1.8±0.8

0.906

  SVD (%)

76 ( 46.6 )

37 ( 44.0 )

0.802

  DVD (%)

50 ( 30.7 )

30 ( 35.7 )

0.501

  TVD (%)

37 ( 22.7 )

17 ( 20.2 )

0.779

  LM involvement (%)

7 ( 4.3 )

1 ( 1.2 )

0.271

  Treated ( culprit ) vessel

   

  LM (%)

2 ( 1.2 )

1 ( 1.2 )

1.000

  LAD (%)

86 ( 52.8 )

51 ( 60.7 )

0.291

  LCx (%)

18 ( 11 )

6 ( 7.1 )

0.451

  RCA (%)

57 ( 35 )

28 ( 33.3 )

0.908

  Ramus medianus (%)

1 ( 0.6 )

0 ( 0 )

1.000

Door to balloon time, min

90.5±42.1

87.7±29

0.587

Interventions

   

  Balloon angioplasty (%)

161 ( 98.8 )

81 ( 96.4 )

0.341

  Thrombectomy

   

  Aspiration (%)

103 ( 63.2 )

55 ( 65.5 )

0.83

  Rheolytic (%)

3 ( 1.8 )

2 ( 2.4 )

1.000

  Stenting

   

  Nil (%)

15 ( 9.2 )

10 ( 11.9 )

0.657

  DES (%)

37 ( 22.7 )

21 ( 25.0 )

0.806

  BMS (%)

108 ( 66.3 )

52 ( 61.9 )

0.591

  DES+BMS (%)

3 ( 1.8 )

1 ( 1.2 )

1.000

  Final TIMI flow

   

  Grade 3 (%)

153 ( 93.9 )

82 ( 97.6 )

0.231

  Grade 2 (%)

10 ( 6.1 )

2 ( 2.4 )

0.231

  Grade 1/0 (%)

0 ( 0 )

0 ( 0 )

0

In-hospital outcome

   

  LVEF, %

43.8±10.9

46.9±9.5

0.031

  Cardiac markers

   

  Peak CK, mg/dl

2683.3±2451.8

2735.1±2676.8

0.897

  Complications

   

  New cardiogenic shock (%)

21 ( 12.9 )

6 ( 7.1 )

0.248

  Respiratory failure (%)

30 ( 18.4 )

8 ( 9.5 )

0.100

  Ventricular arrhythmia (%)

25 ( 15.3 )

8 ( 9.5 )

0.282

  New atrial fibrillation (%)

16 ( 9.8 )

3 ( 3.6 )

0.142

  Emergency CABG (%)

0 ( 0 )

2 ( 2.4 )

0.115

  In hospital Death* (%)

6 ( 3.7 )

0 ( 0 )

0.098

*All were related with refractory heart failure, with 5 of them experiencing ventricular arrhythmia before death. BMS, bare-metal stent; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting surgery; CAD, coronary artery disease; CK, creatinine kinase; DES, drug-eluting stent; DVD, double vessel disease; LAD, left anterior descending artery; LCx, left circumflex artery; LM, left main coronary artery; RCA, right coronary artery; SVD, single vessel disease; TIMI, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction; TVD, triple vessel disease.

Table 3

Independent predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients with STEMI undergoing pPCI

Variable

Hazard ratio

95% C.I.

P*

P

Variables in the model

    

CAD number

4.620

1.006-21.223

0.038

0.049

  1 (reference)

1

   

  >1

4.620

1.006-21.223

0.038

0.049

Peak CK

1.001

1.000-1.001

0.001

0.003

TG

0.963

0.931-0.995

0.049

0.023

Variables not in the model

    

Age

  

0.19

 

Male

  

0.794

 

Hypertension

  

0.339

 

DM

  

0.419

 

Cholesterol

  

0.047

NS

ECG to balloon time

  

0.753

 

LM involvement

  

0.102

NS

Cardiogenic shock

  

0.004

NS

Anterior infarction

  

0.770

 

Culprit LAD

  

0.286

 

Culprit LCx

  

0.844

 

Culprit RCA

  

0.424

 

Culprit LM

  

0.015

NS

TIMI grade

  

<0.001

NS

Thrombectomy

    

  Aspiration

  

0.339

 

  Rheolytic

  

0.040

NS

*From univariate regression analysis, from multivariate regression analysis. CAD, coronary artery disease; CK, creatinine kinase; DM, diabetes mellitus; LAD, left anterior descending artery; LCx, left circumflex artery; LM, left main coronary artery; RCA, right coronary artery; TIMI, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction; TG, triglyceride.

Long-term outcomes

The medications prescribed at discharge were similar in the two groups of patients surviving the STEMI episodes, except that fibrates were given more often in higher-TG patients with the intention to lower serum TG level (Table 4). Kaplan-Meier survival test showed that during a mean follow-up period of 1.23 years for lower-TG and 1.4 years for higher-TG patients (p = 0.126), lower-TG patients had significantly more incidences of TVR (21.7% vs. 9.5%, Log-Rank p = 0.0111) and in turn overall MACE (26.1% vs. 11.9%, Log-Rank p = 0.0137) compared to higher-TG patients, yet the rates of de novo lesions, non-fatal MI, cardiac deaths and all-cause mortality were comparable between groups (Table 4). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard model confirmed that, besides the number of diseased coronary arteries as a positive predictor, serum TG level inversely correlated with TVR (hazard ratio 0.993, 95% CI 0.988-0.998, p = 0.007) and overall MACE (hazard ratio 0.994, 95% CI 0.990-0.999, p = 0.016) in all of our study patients (Table 5).
Table 4

Take-home medications and late clinical outcomes

 

Lower-TG group

Higher-TG group

P

N

157

84

 

Take-home medications

   

  Aspirin (%)

153 (97.5)

84 (100.0)

0.301

  Clopidogrel (%)

154 (98.1)

83 (98.8)

1.000

  *RAAS inhibitor (%)

145 (92.4)

77 (91.7)

1.000

  Beta Blocker (%)

77 (47.2)

47 (56.0)

0.375

  Statin (%)

91 (58)

54 (64.3)

0.414

  Fibrate (%)

2 (1.3)

11 (13.1)

<0.001

Follow-up years (mean)

1.23 (0.22-3.78)

1.40 (0.44-3.73)

0.126

MACE

   

  Non-fatal MI (%)

17 (10.8)

3 (3.6)

0.0731

  TVR (%)

34 (21.7)

8 (9.5)

0.0111

  De novo lesion (%)

9 (5.7)

4(4.8)

0.404

  Cardiac Death (%)

7 (4.5)

0 (0)

0.1688

  All-Cause Mortality (%)

13 (8.3)

1 (1.2)

0.1392

  Overall (%)

41 (26.1)

10 (11.9)

0.0137

*Including angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin-II receptor blockers. derived from Log-Rank test. MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; MI, myocardial infarction; RAAS, rennin-angiotensin-aldosterone system; TVR, target vessel revascularization.

Table 5

Independent predictors of TVR and overall MACE by multivariate Cox regression analysis in all patients

Variable

Hazard ratio

95% C.I.

P

TVR

   

  TG*

0.993

0.988-0.998

0.007

  CAD number*

   

  1 ( reference )

1

  

  >1

2.717

1.655-4.458

<0.001

Overall MACE

   

  TG*

0.994

0.990-0.999

0.016

  CAD number*

   

  1 ( reference )

1

  

  >1

2.706

1.730-4.234

<0.001

*Adjusted for age, gender, smoking, diabetes mellitus, left ventricular ejection fraction, peak creatinine kinase level, balloon angioplasty only, bare-metal stent, drug-eluting stent, low-density lipoprotein level, all medications and high-density lipoprotein level. CAD, coronary artery disease; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular event; TG, triglyceride; TVR, target vessel revascularization.

Discussion

Patients with coronary artery disease presenting as STEMI might develop early fatal/non-fatal complications and late MACE in terms of target lesion revascularization, non-fatal myocardial infarction and cardiac death despite being successfully treated by pPCI. This study, which investigated the possible relations between serum TG and in-hospital as well as late outcomes of such patients, indicated that serum TG level correlates negatively with in-hospital mortality: TG level above 150 mg/dl predicts fewer incidences of late TVR and in turn overall MACE. These findings illustrate the paradoxically inverse relation between serum TG level and clinical outcome of patients with STEMI treated with pPCI, and may justify exclusion of specific TG-lowering therapy from the standard therapeutic regimen in management of such patients in the long term.

Role of TG in in-hospital outcome of STEMI

The role of serum TG in the pathogenesis of CAD is not as clear as that of serum LDL. A number of clinical studies reported a positive association between TG level and severity of CAD [7, 1517], whereas others demonstrated conflicting results [1820]. Investigations involving histological research found that triglycerides played a constitutive role in atherosclerotic plaques yet were rarely identified in active coronary artery lesions as a culprit component [21]. These findings suggest that triglycerides might be merely an innocent bystander rather than a direct atherogenic mediator [2224], and this concept may offer some explanation for our findings that patients with higher TG levels are not at risk of poorer in-hospital outcome after STEMI. In fact, our results demonstrate that there exists a paradoxical trend toward more in-hospital deaths in patients with lower TG levels, though the between-group difference did not reach statistical significance possibly due to limited patient number and confounding by coexistent variables. The role that serum TG plays as an independent negative predictor for in-hospital deaths, finally shown by multivariate regression analysis in this study, has similarly been reported in patients with acute stroke [1113] and acute coronary syndrome [25], but is not easy to understand compared to the roles played by CK level and CAD number as positive predictors, since these two variables represent surrogates of infarct size and ischemic myocardial territory thus are rationally related with in-hospital mortality. One possible explanation for the inverse relation between TG level and in-hospital mortality comes from the findings that incidences of new atrial arrhythmia, ventricular arrhythmia, respiratory failure and new cardiogenic shock all tended to be higher in the lower TG group, along with the exclusive occurrence of lethal ventricular arrhythmia and refractory heart failure in 6 (3.7%) of lower TG patients but not in any of higher TG group. These results implicate the potential role of serum TG in stabilizing the infarcted, stunned or reperfused myocardium after an acute STEMI episode. Another possibility may be based on the concept that serum TG level is an indicator of nutritional status. Lower TG levels denote poorer nutritional condition which could halt myocardial and whole body recovery from STEMI, in turn subjecting patients to in-hospital deaths. This hypothesis gains support from some epidemiologic studies describing low body mass index and serum cholesterol level as markers of poor health status in older subjects [2628], and from clinical investigations reporting worse outcome in patients with advanced heart failure or various cardiovascular diseases and low serum cholesterol [29, 30] or TG concentrations [1113]. Further studies are needed to determine the exact pathophysiological relations between serum TG level and in-hospital outcome in patients with STEMI who receive pPCI treatment.

Role of TG in late outcome of STEMI

Previous studies have demonstrated that even after primary PCI a considerable proportion of patients with STEMI still succumb to subsequent MACE due to left ventricular remodeling and coronary restenosis [31]. The distinct pathogenesis of restenosis caused by smooth muscle cell proliferation rather than lipid-related neo-atherosclerosis [32] explains the poor preventive efficacy of lipid-lowering medications, particularly statins, on inhibition of neointimal formation in this entity of lesions [3335]. Nonetheless, whether higher TG-rich lipoprotein is [36, 37] or is not [34] related with the restenotic phenomenon remains debatable. The current study demonstrated that risk of de novo atherosclerosis was similar between groups with higher or lower TG levels but overall MACE rates, contributed mostly from incidence of TVR, were significantly lower in high-TG patients. These results suggest a potential action of serum TG against neointimal proliferation at the STEMI-related lesion sites ever treated by angioplasty or stenting. This phenomenon has ever been reported in an in vitro study describing the distinct effects of various TG particles on either stimulation or suppression of the proliferative activity of vascular smooth muscle cells [38]. Our findings further indicate that though hypertriglyceridemia is regarded as an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis [39] when coexistent with low HDL- and elevated LDL-cholesterol and needs to be treated after the LDL goal is reached [25], application of such a therapeutic strategy to patients with STEMI post-pPCI is not warranted. On the contrary, the paradoxically inverse relation between hypertriglyceridemia and better late outcome in patients with STEMI treated with pPCI may justify exclusion of specific TG-lowering therapy from the standard therapy in long-term management of such patients. Whether there exists a “J-curve relationship” between serum TG level and the outcome of patients with STEMI treated with pPCI awaits further clarification.

Conclusion

On-admission serum TG levels inversely correlate with in-hospital deaths of patients with STEMI treated with pPCI, and those with TG levels below 150 mg/dl have a worse long-term outcome in terms of TVR and overall MACE than those with higher levels. Thus, serum TG can be regarded as a mediator that protects such patients from short and late cardiovascular events rather than a hazard factor, and hence does not warrant aggressive pharmacological treatment to lower it to the so-called normal level.

Notes

Abbreviations

CAD: 

Coronary artery disease

CK: 

Creatinine kinase

HDL: 

High-density lipoprotein

LDL: 

Low-density lipoprotein

MACE: 

Major adverse cardiovascular event

pPCI: 

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention

STEMI: 

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

TIMI: 

Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction

TG: 

Triglyceride

TVR: 

Target vessel revascularization.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Mr. Kuang-Hsi Chang and Ms. Yu-Hsin Wan for their assistance in statistical analysis.

Cardiovascular Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Cardiovascular Center and Department of Anesthesiology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
(2)
Departments of Medicine and Surgery, Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
(3)
Taipei First Girls High School, Taipei, Taiwan
(4)
Chung-Shan Medical University School of Medicine, Taichung, Taiwan

References

  1. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Borden WB, Bravata DM, Dai S, Ford ES, Fox CS, Fullerton HJ, Gillespie C, Hailpern SM, Heit JA, Howard VJ, Kissela BM, Kittner SJ, Lackland DT, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth LD, Makuc DM, Marcus GM, Marelli A, Matchar DB, Moy CS, Mozaffarian D, Mussolino ME, Nichol G, Paynter NP, Soliman EZ, et al: Heart disease and stroke statistics--2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012, 125 (1): e2-e220.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, Casey DE, Chung MK, de Lemos JA, Ettinger SM, Fang JC, Fesmire FM, Franklin BA, Granger CB, Krumholz HM, Linderbaum JA, Morrow DA, Newby LK, Ornato JP, Ou N, Radford MJ, Tamis-Holland JE, Tommaso CL, Tracy CM, Woo YJ, Zhao DX, Anderson JL, Jacobs AK, Halperin JL, Albert NM, Brindis RG, Creager MA, DeMets D, et al: 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013, 61 (4): e78-e140. 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Figueras J, Alcalde O, Barrabes JA, Serra V, Alguersuari J, Cortadellas J, Lidon RM: Changes in hospital mortality rates in 425 patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction and cardiac rupture over a 30-year period. Circulation. 2008, 118 (25): 2783-2789. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.776690.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Perers E, Caidahl K, Herlitz J, Karlson BW, Karlsson T, Hartford M: Treatment and short-term outcome in women and men with acute coronary syndromes. Int J Cardiol. 2005, 103 (2): 120-127. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.07.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ray KK, Cannon CP, McCabe CH, Cairns R, Tonkin AM, Sacks FM, Jackson G, Braunwald E: Early and late benefits of high-dose atorvastatin in patients with acute coronary syndromes: results from the PROVE IT-TIMI 22 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005, 46 (8): 1405-1410. 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.03.077.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Patti G, Pasceri V, Colonna G, Miglionico M, Fischetti D, Sardella G, Montinaro A, Di Sciascio G: Atorvastatin pretreatment improves outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing early percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the ARMYDA-ACS randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007, 49 (12): 1272-1278. 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.02.025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hokanson JE, Austin MA: Plasma triglyceride level is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease independent of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level: a meta-analysis of population-based prospective studies. J Cardiovasc Risk. 1996, 3 (2): 213-219. 10.1097/00043798-199604000-00014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kannel WB, Vasan RS: Triglycerides as vascular risk factors: new epidemiologic insights. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2009, 24 (4): 345-350. 10.1097/HCO.0b013e32832c1284.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Eberly LE, Stamler J, Neaton JD: Relation of triglyceride levels, fasting and nonfasting, to fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease. Arch Intern Med. 2003, 163 (9): 1077-1083. 10.1001/archinte.163.9.1077.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Carlson LA, Bottiger LE, Ahfeldt PE: Risk factors for myocardial infarction in the Stockholm prospective study. A 14-year follow-up focussing on the role of plasma triglycerides and cholesterol. Acta Med Scand. 1979, 206 (5): 351-360.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Weir CJ, Sattar N, Walters MR, Lees KR: Low triglyceride, not low cholesterol concentration, independently predicts poor outcome following acute stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003, 16 (1): 76-82. 10.1159/000070119.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Pikija S, Trkulja V, Juvan L, Ivanec M, Duksi D: Higher On-admission Serum Triglycerides Predict Less Severe Disability and Lower All-cause Mortality after Acute Ischemic Stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013, 22 (7): e15-e24. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.03.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Li W, Liu M, Wu B, Liu H, Wang LC, Tan S: Serum lipid levels and 3-month prognosis in Chinese patients with acute stroke. Adv Ther. 2008, 25 (4): 329-341. 10.1007/s12325-008-0045-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Morrow DA, Antman EM, Charlesworth A, Cairns R, Murphy SA, de Lemos JA, Giugliano RP, McCabe CH, Braunwald E: TIMI risk score for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A convenient, bedside, clinical score for risk assessment at presentation: An intravenous nPA for treatment of infarcting myocardium early II trial substudy. Circulation. 2000, 102 (17): 2031-2037. 10.1161/01.CIR.102.17.2031.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Assmann G, Schulte H, von Eckardstein A: Hypertriglyceridemia and elevated lipoprotein(a) are risk factors for major coronary events in middle-aged men. Am J Cardiol. 1996, 77 (14): 1179-1184. 10.1016/S0002-9149(96)00159-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Haim M, Benderly M, Brunner D, Behar S, Graff E, Reicher-Reiss H, Goldbourt U: Elevated serum triglyceride levels and long-term mortality in patients with coronary heart disease: the Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention (BIP) Registry. Circulation. 1999, 100 (5): 475-482. 10.1161/01.CIR.100.5.475.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Sarwar N, Danesh J, Eiriksdottir G, Sigurdsson G, Wareham N, Bingham S, Boekholdt SM, Khaw KT, Gudnason V: Triglycerides and the risk of coronary heart disease: 10,158 incident cases among 262,525 participants in 29 Western prospective studies. Circulation. 2007, 115 (4): 450-458. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.637793.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Wilson PW, Anderson KM, Castelli WP: Twelve-year incidence of coronary heart disease in middle-aged adults during the era of hypertensive therapy: the Framingham offspring study. Am J Med. 1991, 90 (1): 11-16. 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90500-W.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Pocock SJ, Shaper AG, Phillips AN: Concentrations of high density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and total cholesterol in ischaemic heart disease. BMJ. 1989, 298 (6679): 998-1002. 10.1136/bmj.298.6679.998.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Grundy SM, Vega GL: Two different views of the relationship of hypertriglyceridemia to coronary heart disease. Implications for treatment. Arch Intern Med. 1992, 152 (1): 28-34. 10.1001/archinte.1992.00400130054004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gandotra P, Miller M: The role of triglycerides in cardiovascular risk. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2008, 10 (6): 505-511. 10.1007/s11886-008-0079-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Steinberg D: Building the Basic Science Foundation. The Cholesterol Wars: The Cholesterol Skeptics vs the Preponderance of Evidence. Edited by: Steinberg D. 2007, New York: Elsevier Ltd, 78-Google Scholar
  23. Scott MG, Diane B, Luther TC, Richard SC, Margo AD, James H, Donald BH, Roger I, Russell VL, Patrick MB, James MM, Richard CP, Neil JS, Linda VH: Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation. 2002, 106 (25): 3143-3421.Google Scholar
  24. Talayero BG, Sacks FM: The role of triglycerides in atherosclerosis. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2011, 13 (6): 544-552. 10.1007/s11886-011-0220-3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Khawaja OA, Hatahet H, Cavalcante J, Khanal S, Al-Mallah MH: Low admission triglyceride and mortality in acute coronary syndrome patients. Cardiol J. 2011, 18 (3): 297-303.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Windler E, Ewers-Grabow U, Thiery J, Walli A, Seidel D, Greten H: The prognostic value of hypocholesterolemia in hospitalized patients. Clin Investig. 1994, 72 (12): 939-943. 10.1007/BF00577732.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Volpato S, Zuliani G, Guralnik JM, Palmieri E, Fellin R: The inverse association between age and cholesterol level among older patients: the role of poor health status. Gerontology. 2001, 47 (1): 36-45. 10.1159/000052768.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Noel MA, Smith TK, Ettinger WH: Characteristics and outcomes of hospitalized older patients who develop hypocholesterolemia. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991, 39 (5): 455-461.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Richartz BM, Radovancevic B, Frazier OH, Vaughn WK, Taegtmeyer H: Low serum cholesterol levels predict high perioperative mortality in patients supported by a left-ventricular assist system. Cardiology. 1998, 89 (3): 184-188. 10.1159/000006785.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Horwich TB, Hamilton MA, Maclellan WR, Fonarow GC: Low serum total cholesterol is associated with marked increase in mortality in advanced heart failure. J Card Fail. 2002, 8 (4): 216-224. 10.1054/jcaf.2002.0804216.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL: Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet. 2003, 361 (9351): 13-20. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12113-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Inoue T, Uchida T, Yaguchi I, Sakai Y, Takayanagi K, Morooka S: Stent-induced expression and activation of the leukocyte integrin Mac-1 is associated with neointimal thickening and restenosis. Circulation. 2003, 107 (13): 1757-1763. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000060487.15126.56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Veinot JP, Edwards WD, Camrud AR, Jorgenson MA, Holmes DR, Schwartz RS: The effects of lovastatin on neointimal hyperplasia following injury in a porcine coronary artery model. Can J Cardiol. 1996, 12 (1): 65-70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Petronio AS, Amoroso G, Limbruno U, Papini B, De Carlo M, Micheli A, Ciabatti N, Mariani M: Simvastatin does not inhibit intimal hyperplasia and restenosis but promotes plaque regression in normocholesterolemic patients undergoing coronary stenting: a randomized study with intravascular ultrasound. Am Heart J. 2005, 149 (3): 520-526. 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.10.032.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lerakis S, El-Chami MF, Patel AD, Veledar E, Alexopoulos E, Zacharoulis A, Triantafyllou A: Effect of lipid levels and lipid-lowering therapy on restenosis after coronary artery stenting. Am J Med Sci. 2006, 331 (5): 270-273. 10.1097/00000441-200605000-00007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Oi K1, Shimokawa H, Hirakawa Y, Tashiro H, Nakaike R, Kozai T, Ohzono K, Yamamoto K, Koyanagi S, Okamatsu S, Tajimi T, Kikuchi Y, Takeshita A: Postprandial increase in plasma concentrations of remnant-like particles: an independent risk factor for restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2004, 44 (1): 66-73. 10.1097/00005344-200407000-00009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kato T, Inoue T, Inagaki H, Hashimoto S, Hikichi Y, Tanaka A, Isobe M, Node K: Remnant-like lipoprotein particle level and insulin resistance are associated with in-stent restenosis in patients with stable angina. Coron Artery Dis. 2007, 18 (4): 319-322. 10.1097/MCA.0b013e32802c7cc4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Bermudez B, Lopez S, Pacheco YM, Villar J, Muriana FJ, Hoheisel JD, Bauer A, Abia R: Influence of postprandial triglyceride-rich lipoproteins on lipid-mediated gene expression in smooth muscle cells of the human coronary artery. Cardiovasc Res. 2008, 79 (2): 294-303. 10.1093/cvr/cvn082.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Miller M, Stone NJ, Ballantyne C, Bittner V, Criqui MH, Ginsberg HN, Goldberg AC, Howard WJ, Jacobson MS, Kris-Etherton PM, Lennie TA, Levi M, Mazzone T, Pennathur S, American Heart Association Clinical Lipidology, Thrombosis, and Prevention Committee of the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; Council on Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; Council on the Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease: Triglycerides and cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011, 123 (20): 2292-2333. 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182160726.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2261/14/143/prepub

Copyright

© Cheng et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement