Skip to main content

Table 3 Association of cMetS and its components with any ECG abnormalities

From: The association between continuous metabolic syndrome score and its components with electrocardiographic abnormalities in community-dwelling older adults: the Bushehr elderly health (BEH) program

 

No ECG abnormality

Any ECG abnormality

cMetS

  

 Crude Model

1.00

1.04(1.00-1.07)

 Model 1

1.00

1.04(1.01–1.07)

 Model 2

1.00

1.04(1.01–1.08)

MAP

  

 Crude Model

1.00

1.01(1.00-1.02)

 Model 1

1.00

1.01(1.00-1.02)

 Model 2

1.00

1.01(1.00-1.02)

TG

  

 Crude Model

1.00

1.00(0.99-1.00)

 Model 1

1.00

1.00(0.99-1.00)

 Model 2

1.00

1.00(0.99-1.00)

Waist circumference

  

 Crude Model

1.00

1.00(0.99–1.01)

 Model 1

1.00

1.00(0.99–1.01)

 Model 2

1.00

1.00(0.99–1.02)

HDL-C

  

 Crude Model

1.00

1.00(0.99–1.01)

 Model 1

1.00

0.99(0.98-1.00)

 Model 2

1.00

0.99(0.98–1.01)

FBG

  

 Crude Model

1.00

1.01(1.00-1.01)

 Model 1

1.00

1.00(1.00-1.01)

 Model 2

1.00

1.00(1.00-1.01)

  1. Data are presented as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). FBG: fasting blood glucose, HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, MAP: mean arterial pressure, cMetS: continuous metabolic syndrome
  2. Model 1: adjusted for age and sex
  3. Model 2: Additionally, adjusted for smoking, physical activity, education and, body mass index.