Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: The creation and validation of predictive models to assess the risk of unfavorable outcomes following hybrid total arch repair for Stanford type A aortic dissection

Original Submission
26 Jan 2023 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Apr 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Akiko Tanaka
2 May 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
4 Aug 2023 Author responded Author comments - Xionggang Jiang
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Aug 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Aug 2023 Author responded Author comments - Xionggang Jiang
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Aug 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Sep 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
16 Sep 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
27 Sep 2023 Author responded Author comments - Xionggang Jiang
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Sep 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 4
4 Oct 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
10 Oct 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Akiko Tanaka
14 Oct 2023 Author responded Author comments - Xionggang Jiang
Resubmission - Version 5
14 Oct 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 5
29 Oct 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Akiko Tanaka
31 Oct 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
4 Nov 2023 Author responded Author comments - Xionggang Jiang
Resubmission - Version 6
4 Nov 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 6
5 Nov 2023 Author responded Author comments - Xionggang Jiang
Resubmission - Version 7
5 Nov 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 7
20 Nov 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
29 Nov 2023 Editorially accepted
10 Dec 2023 Article published 10.1186/s12872-023-03642-9

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page