Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Identification of distinct clinical phenotypes of cardiogenic shock using machine learning consensus clustering approach

Original Submission
14 Nov 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Jan 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
3 May 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
9 Jun 2023 Author responded Author comments - Yue Yu
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Jun 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 4
9 Jun 2023 Author responded Author comments - Yue Yu
Resubmission - Version 5
9 Jun 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 5
17 Jun 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
27 Jun 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
29 Jun 2023 Author responded Author comments - Yue Yu
Resubmission - Version 6
29 Jun 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 6
3 Jul 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
4 Jul 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
5 Jul 2023 Editorially accepted
29 Aug 2023 Article published 10.1186/s12872-023-03380-y

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page