Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison in the predictive performance of VIS, VVR, M-VVR

From: Comparison of vasoactive-inotropic score, vasoactive-ventilation-renal score, and modified vasoactive-ventilation-renal score for predicting the poor prognosis after coronary artery bypass grafting

Variables

AUC

95% CI

M-VVR

0.720

0.668–0.771

VVR

0.621

0.566–0.677

VIS

0.685

0.631–0.739

  1. VIS, vasoactive-inotropic score; VVR, vasoactive-ventilation-renal score; M-VVR, modified vasoactive-ventilation-renal score; AUC, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CI, confidence interval
  2. M-VVR vs. VVR: P = 0.004;
  3. M-VVR vs. VIS: P = 0.003;
  4. VVR vs. VIS: P = 0.043
Back to article page

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2261

Contact us