Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From:

Original Submission
4 Oct 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Nov 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
16 Dec 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
2 Jan 2023 Author responded Author comments - Anete Kaldal
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Jan 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Jan 2023 Author responded Author comments - Anete Kaldal
Resubmission - Version 4
5 Jan 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 4
9 Jan 2023 Author responded Author comments - Anete Kaldal
Resubmission - Version 5
9 Jan 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 5
25 Jan 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
27 Jan 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
17 Feb 2023 Author responded Author comments - Anete Kaldal
Resubmission - Version 6
17 Feb 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 6
28 Feb 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
28 Feb 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
4 Mar 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
9 Apr 2023 Author responded Author comments - Anete Kaldal
Resubmission - Version 7
9 Apr 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 7
12 Apr 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
16 Apr 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
18 Apr 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
19 Apr 2023 Editorially accepted
28 Apr 2023 Article published 10.1186/s12872-023-03249-0

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page