Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparisons of the ROC curves

From: Speckle-tracking echocardiography provides sensitive measurements of subtle early alterations associated with cardiac dysfunction in T2DM rats

Variable

Difference between area

Standard Error

95% CI

z statistic

P value

GLS vs GLSR

0.118

0.117

-0.112 to 0.348

1.006

0.315

GCS vs GCSR

0.080

0.069

-0.055 to 0.214

1.164

0.244

GRS vs GRSR

0.212

0.101

0.014 to 0.410

2.099

0.036*

GCS vs GRS

0.292

0.138

0.020 to 0.563

2.108

0.035*

GCSR vs GRSR

0.160

0.104

-0.044 to 0.363

1.541

0.123

FAC vs GCS

0.108

0.073

-0.035 to 0.250

1.484

0.138

FAC vs GCSR

0.028

0.078

-0.126 to 0.181

0.354

0.723

FAC vs GRS

0.399

0.122

0.161 to 0.638

3.284

0.001**

FAC vs GRSR

0.188

0.110

-0.028 to 0.403

1.708

0.088

  1. FAC fractional area change, GLS global longitudinal strain, GLSR global longitudinal strain rate, GCS global circumferential strain, GCSR global circumferential strain rate, GRS global radial strain, GRSR global radial strain rate. The comparison between the AUC of 2 ROC curves was performed. Statistically different
  2. *P < 0.05
  3. **P < 0.01