Peer Review reports
From: Cost-effectiveness of an insertable cardiac monitor in a high-risk population in the US
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
25 Jan 2022 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
8 Mar 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
2 Aug 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Victoria Mccreanor |
19 Sep 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Laura M. Sawyer |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
19 Sep 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
21 Sep 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Laura M. Sawyer |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
21 Sep 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
26 Sep 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Laura M. Sawyer |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
26 Sep 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
5 Oct 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
13 Oct 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Victoria Mccreanor |
25 Oct 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Laura M. Sawyer |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
25 Oct 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
26 Oct 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Laura M. Sawyer |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
26 Oct 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
12 Nov 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
15 Nov 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Victoria Mccreanor |
5 Jan 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - Laura M. Sawyer |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
5 Jan 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
16 Jan 2023 | Editorially accepted | |
25 Jan 2023 | Article published | 10.1186/s12872-023-03073-6 |
You can find further information about peer review here.