Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Cost-effectiveness of an insertable cardiac monitor in a high-risk population in the US

Original Submission
25 Jan 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Mar 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
2 Aug 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Victoria Mccreanor
19 Sep 2022 Author responded Author comments - Laura M. Sawyer
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Sep 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Sep 2022 Author responded Author comments - Laura M. Sawyer
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Sep 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Sep 2022 Author responded Author comments - Laura M. Sawyer
Resubmission - Version 4
26 Sep 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 4
5 Oct 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
13 Oct 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Victoria Mccreanor
25 Oct 2022 Author responded Author comments - Laura M. Sawyer
Resubmission - Version 5
25 Oct 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 5
26 Oct 2022 Author responded Author comments - Laura M. Sawyer
Resubmission - Version 6
26 Oct 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 6
12 Nov 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
15 Nov 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Victoria Mccreanor
5 Jan 2023 Author responded Author comments - Laura M. Sawyer
Resubmission - Version 7
5 Jan 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
16 Jan 2023 Editorially accepted
25 Jan 2023 Article published 10.1186/s12872-023-03073-6

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page