Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Clinical outcomes of bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with self-expandable valves

Original Submission
12 Jan 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Jan 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
19 Apr 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alberto Alperi
27 Jul 2022 Author responded Author comments - Daxin Zhou
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Jul 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Jul 2022 Author responded Author comments - Daxin Zhou
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Jul 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 3
29 Jul 2022 Author responded Author comments - Daxin Zhou
Resubmission - Version 4
29 Jul 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 4
12 Aug 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alberto Alperi
12 Aug 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
8 Sep 2022 Author responded Author comments - Daxin Zhou
Resubmission - Version 5
8 Sep 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 5
12 Sep 2022 Author responded Author comments - Daxin Zhou
Resubmission - Version 6
12 Sep 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 6
21 Sep 2022 Author responded Author comments - Daxin Zhou
Resubmission - Version 7
21 Sep 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 7
4 Oct 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
8 Oct 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alberto Alperi
18 Oct 2022 Author responded Author comments - Daxin Zhou
Resubmission - Version 8
18 Oct 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 8
25 Oct 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
9 Nov 2022 Editorially accepted
12 Dec 2022 Article published 10.1186/s12872-022-02943-9

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page