Skip to main content

Table 6 Scenario analyses in patient subgroups

From: A telemonitoring programme in patients with heart failure in France: a cost-utility analysis

 

Life years

QALYs

Total costs (€)

ICER

(€/LY)

ICER (€/QALY)

Base case

SCAD

6.03

4.41

35,177

  

SC

5.11

3.75

30,932

4579

6491

Difference

0.93

0.65

4245

  

Preserved ejection fraction

SCAD

5.88

4.24

34,707

  

SC

4.87

3.54

30,628

4045

5843

Difference

1.01

0.70

4079

  

Mid-range ejection fraction

SCAD

6.19

4.54

34,107

  

SC

5.29

3.90

29,821

4741

6625

Difference

0.90

0.65

4287

  

Reduced ejection fraction

SCAD

6.00

4.32

35,781

  

SC

5.03

3.65

31,448

4474

6431

Difference

0.97

0.67

4332

  

NYHA Class I/II

SCAD

6.66

5.16

34,694

  

SC

5.87

4.55

30,144

5779

7500

Difference

0.79

0.61

4550

  

NYHA Class III/IV

SCAD

5.06

3.23

35,933

3289

5176

SC

3.91

2.51

32,164

  

Difference

1.15

0.73

3769

  
  1. ICER incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; LY life-years; NYHA New York Hospital Association; QALY quality-adjusted life year; SC standard care; SCAD Suivi Clinique A Domicile