Skip to main content

Table 4 Clinical outcome of follow-up after stenting during study period

From: Comparing clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes undergoing coronary artery bypass graft and percutaneous coronary intervention in real world practice in Iranian population

 

DES (n = 145), n (%)

BMS (n = 26), n (%)

P value*

CABG (n = 334), n (%)

P value**

Cardiac death

0 (0)

2 (14.28)

< 0.001

15 (8.59)

0.014

CVA

1 (1.36)

2 (14.28)

0.041

14 (7.58)

0.063

TVR

12 (15.28)

7 (42.42)

0.013

6 (3.52)

< 0.001

MACCE

14 (17.61)

9 (51.42)

0.001

39 (20.91)

0.757

MACCE ex TVR

4 (5.36)

6 (37.50)

< 0.001

32 (19.5)

0.020

Non-Fatal MI

3 (4.05)

3 (20.68)

0.029

5 (4.12)

0.439

  1. *The comparison between DES versus BMS
  2. **The comparison between CABG versus DES
Back to article page

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2261

Contact us