Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: The best QT correction formula in a non-hospitalized population: the Fasa PERSIAN cohort study

Original Submission
24 Feb 2020 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Apr 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
30 Apr 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
7 May 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Johannes J. Struijk
11 Jun 2020 Author responded Author comments - Mohammad Hosein Yazdanpanah
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Jun 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Jun 2020 Author responded Author comments - Mohammad Hosein Yazdanpanah
Resubmission - Version 3
23 Jun 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Jul 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
2 Aug 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
3 Sep 2020 Author responded Author comments - Mohammad Hosein Yazdanpanah
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Sep 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 4
21 Sep 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
29 Sep 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
1 Nov 2020 Author responded Author comments - Mohammad Hosein Yazdanpanah
Resubmission - Version 5
1 Nov 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 5
2 Jan 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
28 Feb 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
7 Apr 2021 Author responded Author comments - Mohammad Hosein Yazdanpanah
Resubmission - Version 6
7 Apr 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 6
20 May 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
16 Nov 2021 Author responded Author comments - Mohammad Hosein Yazdanpanah
Resubmission - Version 7
16 Nov 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 7
3 Feb 2022 Author responded Author comments - Mohammad Hosein Yazdanpanah
Resubmission - Version 8
3 Feb 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
8 Feb 2022 Editorially accepted
16 Feb 2022 Article published 10.1186/s12872-022-02502-2

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page