Skip to main content

Table 4 Risk of bias assessment in randomized controlled trials

From: Effect of glutamine supplementation on cardiometabolic risk factors and inflammatory markers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author (year)

Sequence generation

Allocation concealment

Blinding of participants and personnel

Blinding of outcome assessors

Incomplete outcome data

Selective reporting

Other bias

Overall quality

Subjective outcomes

Objective outcomes

Bakalar et al. 2006 [26]

Low risk

Unclear risk

High risk

High risk

Unclear risk

Low risk

Low risk

Unclear risk

Poor quality

Mansour et al. 2015 [29]

Low risk

Low risk

Unclear risk

High risk

Unclear risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Poor quality

Dock-Nascimento et al. 2012 [3]

Low risk

Low risk

Unclear risk

Unclear risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Fair quality

Cui et al. 2013 [27]

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Unclear risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Good quality

Singh et al. 2015 [23]

Low risk

Unclear risk

High risk

High risk

Unclear risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Fair quality

Letellier et al. 2013 [25]

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Good quality

Laviano et al. 2014 [24]

Low risk

Unclear risk

High risk

High risk

Unclear risk

Low risk

Low risk

Unclear risk

Poor quality

Hissa et al. 2011 [28]

Low risk

Unclear risk

High risk

Unclear risk

Unclear risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Poor quality

Engel et al. 2009 [31]

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Unclear risk

Unclear risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Fair quality

Ockenga et al. 2002 [33]

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Good quality

Cavalcante et al. 2012 [32]

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

High risk

Unclear risk

Low risk

Low risk

Unclear risk

Poor quality

Lomivorotov et al. 2012 [30]

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Unclear risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Good quality