Skip to main content

Table 3 Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics of study population at follow-up

From: Tricuspid regurgitation in ischemic mitral regurgitation patients: prevalence, predictors for outcome and long-term follow-up

 

Overall (N = 134)

RTF progression (N = 39)

No FTR progression (N = 94)

p value for trend

Age, years; mean ± SD (range)

59.7 ± 11.5

[30–94]

60.5 ± 12.5

[38–94]

59.3 ± 11.2

[30–89]

0.356

Gender (Male)

105 (78.4)

32 (82.1)

73 (76.8)

0.06

LA Area, mm (Range)

39.53 ± 9.2

[20–73]

42.9 ± 10.6

[23–73]

35.61 ± 7.0

[20–53]

0.06

LVIDD, mm

56.2 ± 7.2

[42–72]

58.9 ± 7.3

[43–70]

53.1 ± 6.1

[42–64]

0.05

LVEF, %

45.1 ± 10.2

[20–65]

40. 1 ± 10.3

[20–58]

50.6 ± 7.3

[30–65]

 < 0.0001

RV FAC, %

27.0 ± 6.1

[10–38]

23.1 ± 6.9

[10–37]

30.50 ± 3.8

[23–38]

0.002

RV dysfunction > 2, n (%)

40 (29.9)

22 (56.4)

3 (4.2)

 < 0.0001

Mean sPAP, mm Hg

38.5 ± 12.3

[19–66]

43.6 ± 11.62

[22–65]

31.6 ± 8.4

[19–59]

 < 0.0001

PHT ≥ Moderate, n (%)

51 (38.1)

23 (59)

9 (12.5)

0.001

MR > 2, n (%)

46 (34.3)

36 (78.3)

10 (11.4)

 < 0.0001

Echocardiographic Groupa

 < 0.0001

Group 1

 

0 (0)

32 (69.6)

 

Group 2

 

5 (5.7)

4 (8.7)

 

Group 3

 

9 (10.2)

5 (10.9)

 

Group 4

 

74 (84.1)

5 (10.5)

 
  1. Overall and by FTR development grade
  2. R = .917, R2 = .842. No multicollinearity was observed
  3. LVIDD indicates left ventricular internal diameter at end-diastolic phase; LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction; RV FAC, Right ventricular fractional area change; sPAP, systolic pulmonary artery pressure; PHT, Pulmonary Hypertension; MR, mitral regurgitation
  4. asee Table 4 for reference